Export Report
OVERALL SCORE
Level 3, Bot-Aware
- AI Discoverability 44 out of 100
- Agent Ease of Use 51 out of 100
- Security & Trust 67 out of 100
- GEO, AIO and AEO 62 out of 100
- SEO 100 out of 100
- Performance 44 out of 100
- Accessibility 60 out of 100
What AI sees of your website
University of Arizona in Tucson, AZ
The University of Arizona: Recognized for outstanding academics and a student-first outlook filled with wonder.
Next step
Turn this report into a fix workflow
1 failed check is ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.
| Metric | Score | Status | Passed | Failed | Warning | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI Discoverability | 44 | Priority fix | 20 | 2 | 1 | View details |
| Discoverability | 47 | Priority fix | 6 | 0 | 0 | |
| Content Readiness | 40 | Priority fix | 13 | 1 | 1 | View details |
| Bot Access Control | 45 | Priority fix | 1 | 1 | 0 | View details |
| Agent Ease of Use | 51 | Needs work | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| Auth | 48 | Priority fix | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Skill Discovery | 54 | Needs work | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| GEO, AIO and AEO | 62 | Needs work | 7 | 0 | 0 | |
| GEO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| AIO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| AEO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| SEO | 100 | Strong | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| SEO | 100 | Strong | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| Security & Trust | 67 | Needs work | 13 | 0 | 0 | |
| Security & Trust | 67 | Needs work | 13 | 0 | 0 | |
| Performance | 44 | Priority fix | 8 | 1 | 0 | View details |
| Performance | 44 | Priority fix | 8 | 1 | 0 | View details |
Prioritized recommendations
Issues ranked by score impact
3 items need attention
AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEstablished
AI bot rules in robots.txt
AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".
69 Fail
AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEstablished
AI bot rules in robots.txt
AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".
Needs attention
AI bot rules in robots.txt
Issue
No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.
Why it matters
AI crawler product tokens have different meanings. Explicit robots.txt groups make training, search, and retrieval access policy auditable for compliant crawler operators.
Check name
AI bot rules in robots.txt
Score
31/100
Status
fail
Category
Bot Access Control
Maturity
Established
Goal
Declare deliberate robots.txt rules for major AI training, AI search, user-triggered, and dataset crawlers.
Result
AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".
Validation steps
Classify AI crawler rules
No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.
Evidence log1 step · 6 lines
Classify AI crawler rules [fail]! No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.INFOClassify AI crawler rulesINFOParsing User-agent groups and Allow/Disallow records for known AI crawler tokens evaluatedPath="/"INFOEvaluating exact User-agent matches before wildcard fallback exactAiPolicyCount=0 totalCrawlerTokens=18FAILNo explicit AI crawler User-agent groups were found examplesExpected=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ClaudeBot","Google-Extended","CCBot"]FAILCompare explicit AI crawler coverage actual=0 expected="> 0 explicit non-search AI crawler policies" missingTokens=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ChatGPT-User","ClaudeBot","Claude-SearchBot","Claude-User","Google-Extended","Applebot-Extended","Amazonbot","Amzn-SearchBot","Amzn-User","PerplexityBot"]INFOResolved effective root-path policy for crawler tokens blocked=0 allowed=21 unspecified=0AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Author attribution
Author attribution is partially implemented.
45 Warning
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Author attribution
Author attribution is partially implemented.
Needs attention
Author attribution
Issue
No named author or publisher identity could be extracted.
Why it matters
Author attribution helps agents cite content responsibly, assess source credibility, and distinguish editorial pages from anonymous marketing copy.
Check name
Author attribution
Score
55/100
Status
warning
Category
Content Readiness
Maturity
Established
Goal
Identify content authors or publishers for trust and attribution.
Result
Author attribution is partially implemented.
Validation steps
Schema.org attribution
Schema.org attribution is incomplete or relies only on publisher/fallback evidence.
Author identity quality
No named author or publisher identity could be extracted.
Evidence log2 steps · 8 lines
Schema.org attribution [warning]! Schema.org attribution is incomplete or relies only on publisher/fallback evidence.INFOSchema.org attributionINFOChecking structured data for author, creator, and publisher contributorsWARNCheck named Schema.org author count actual=0 expected="> 0" authorCount=0 publisherCount=0 namedContributors=0 authors=[] publishers=[] formats=[]WARNSchema.org attribution is incomplete or fallback-only authorCount=0 publisherCount=0 authors=[] publishers=[]Author identity quality [fail]! No named author or publisher identity could be extracted.INFOAuthor identity qualityINFOChecking contributors for stable identity signalsFAILCheck identified contributor count actual=0 expected="> 0" namedContributors=0 identifiedContributors=[] unidentifiedContributors=[]FAILNo named contributor identity could be extracted
PerformancePerformanceBrowser audit
Avoid large layout shifts
100 Fail
PerformancePerformanceBrowser audit
Avoid large layout shifts
Check name
Avoid large layout shifts
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Device
desktop
Category
Performance
Estimated savings
4 layout shifts found
Fix guidance
These are the largest layout shifts observed on the page. Each table item represents a single layout shift, and shows the element that shifted the most. Below each item are possible root causes that led to the layout shift. Some of these layout shifts may not be included in the CLS metric value due to [windowing](https://web.dev/articles/cls#what_is_cls). [Learn how to improve CLS](https://web.dev/articles/optimize-cls)
References
https://web.dev/learn/performance/Evidence
{
"displayValue": "4 layout shifts found",
"description": "These are the largest layout shifts observed on the page. Each table item represents a single layout shift, and shows the element that shifted the most. Below each item are possible root causes that led to the layout shift. Some of these layout shifts may not be included in the CLS metric value due to [windowing](https://web.dev/articles/cls#what_is_cls). [Learn how to improve CLS](https://web.dev/articles/optimize-cls)"
}Sign in to see 47 other issues and the full report
Create a free account to unlock every issue, evidence details, exports, and higher free limits.
Development Note:
Please configure GOOGLE_CLIENT_ID in .env to activate live login.
Fix with MCP or CLI
Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.
Score history
Public scan score over time
Public reports for this website origin. Select any point or report link to open that canonical report.
| Scan date | Score | Readiness | Report |
|---|---|---|---|
| 52/100 | Level 3, Bot-Aware | Current report |