CanAgentUse

CanAgentUse products

Agentic Browsing AuditCheck dialogs, menus, drawers, popovers, form errors, checkout steps, and other UI states that a standard Lighthouse scan may not capture.View product MCP ServerInstall CanAgentUse in your coding agent so scan findings become repo-ready fixes.View product WooCommerce PluginPublish UCP discovery and agent-ready commerce signals from WooCommerce without rebuilding checkout.View product Shopify PluginAdd UCP discovery, storefront metadata checks, and controlled cart-to-checkout flows for shopping agents.View product AgentReady CIScan commits and PRs, publish reports, and choose which agent-readiness failures should block merges.View product

CanAgentUse tools

UCP Suite

Validate Universal Commerce Protocol discovery, then test product search, carts, checkout links, and merchant handoff flows.

UCP ValidatorUCP Playground

MCP Playground

Connect to remote MCP servers, inspect tools and resources, test prompts, auth, headers, notifications, and JSON-RPC responses.

MCP Playground

A2A Playground

Inspect Agent Cards, validate advertised endpoints, and prepare safe requests for agent-to-agent workflows.

A2A Playground

Agent Website Viewer

Enter a public URL and see the roles, names, landmarks, controls, and blockers that shape how AI agents understand the page.

Agent Website Viewer
New Scan
https://aspiredigital.cn/homepage/
SCANNED
Jul 12, 2026, 2:35 AM
VISIBILITY
Public
SUITE2026.06.10
Rescan Report
Share Report
Copy Report Link
Export Report
39/100

OVERALL SCORE

Level 2, Agent-Limited

Priority improvements needed for AI agents
AIDiscoverability22%Agent Easeof Use59%Security& Trust68%GEO, AIO, AEO29%SEO82%Performance78%Accessibility0%
  • AI Discoverability 22 out of 100
  • Agent Ease of Use 59 out of 100
  • Security & Trust 68 out of 100
  • GEO, AIO and AEO 29 out of 100
  • SEO 82 out of 100
  • Performance 78 out of 100
  • Accessibility 0 out of 100

CAPTURED SCREENSHOT

Captured website desktop screenshot

What AI sees of your website

Aspire LifeStyles

No page metadata or readable excerpt was captured.

Open Agent View

Next step

Turn this report into a fix workflow

2 failed checks are ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.

Fix with MCP / CLI
Detailed report scores grouped by capability area
MetricScoreStatusPassedFailedWarningEvidence
AI Discoverability
22
Priority fix720View details
Discoverability
7
Priority fix100
Content Readiness
16
Priority fix600
Bot Access Control
38
Priority fix020View details
Agent Ease of Use
59
Needs work200
Google Agentic Browsing
100
Strong200
GEO, AIO and AEO
29
Priority fix342View details
GEO Readiness
14
Priority fix042View details
AIO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable200
AEO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable100
SEO
82
Mostly ready610View details
SEO
82
Mostly ready610View details
Security & Trust
68
Needs work1500
Security & Trust
68
Needs work1500
Performance
78
Mostly ready1300
Performance
78
Mostly ready1300

Prioritized recommendations

Issues ranked by score impact

8 items need attention

AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEstablished

AI bot rules in robots.txt

AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Fetch robots.txt".

100 Fail

Needs attention

AI bot rules in robots.txt

Failed check
01

Issue

No robots.txt content was available to inspect for AI bot rules.

Details

02

Why it matters

AI crawler product tokens have different meanings. Explicit robots.txt groups make training, search, and retrieval access policy auditable for compliant crawler operators.

Check name

AI bot rules in robots.txt

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Category

Bot Access Control

Maturity

Established

Goal

Declare deliberate robots.txt rules for major AI training, AI search, user-triggered, and dataset crawlers.

Result

AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Fetch robots.txt".

Validation steps

  1. Fetch robots.txt

    No robots.txt content was available to inspect for AI bot rules.

    robots.txt is missing for AI crawler policy inspection

  2. Classify AI crawler rules

    No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.

    robots.txt lacks explicit AI crawler rules
Evidence log2 steps · 10 lines
Fetch robots.txt [fail]! No robots.txt content was available to inspect for AI bot rules.INFOFetch robots.txtINFORequesting /robots.txt from the site originFAILCheck whether robots.txt content is available actual="no content" expected="content returned" length=0FAILNo robots.txt content was available to inspect for AI bot rules.Classify AI crawler rules [fail]! No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.INFOClassify AI crawler rulesINFOParsing User-agent groups and Allow/Disallow records for known AI crawler tokens evaluatedPath="/"INFOEvaluating exact User-agent matches before wildcard fallback exactAiPolicyCount=0 totalCrawlerTokens=18FAILNo explicit AI crawler User-agent groups were found examplesExpected=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ClaudeBot","Google-Extended","CCBot"]FAILCompare explicit AI crawler coverage actual=0 expected="> 0 explicit non-search AI crawler policies" missingTokens=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ChatGPT-User","ClaudeBot","Claude-SearchBot","Claude-User","Google-Extended","Applebot-Extended","Amazonbot","Amzn-SearchBot","Amzn-User","PerplexityBot"]INFOResolved effective root-path policy for crawler tokens blocked=0 allowed=0 unspecified=21

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

GEO: Source and trust signals

GEO: Source and trust signals scored 0/100 and needs a fix.

6 Fail

Needs attention

GEO: Source and trust signals

Failed check
01

Issue

Missing source or trust signals: authorOrOwner, freshnessDate, sourceLinks, aboutOrContact, policyLinks, entityLinks.

Details

02

Why it matters

Generative answer systems work best with visible, self-contained, evidence-backed content, clear entities, trustworthy attribution, structured page sections, and crawler-accessible HTML. These signals improve machine understanding even though they do not guarantee AI citations.

Check name

GEO: Source and trust signals

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for AI answer engines to extract, cite, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

GEO: Source and trust signals scored 0/100 and needs a fix.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

GEO: Structured extraction

GEO: Structured extraction scored 25/100 and needs a fix.

4 Fail

Needs attention

GEO: Structured extraction

Failed check
01

Issue

Missing or weak extraction signals: heading structure, clean heading hierarchy, summary or key takeaways, FAQ or question-answer section where appropriate, direct definition sentence, typed JSON-LD structured data.

Details

02

Why it matters

Generative answer systems work best with visible, self-contained, evidence-backed content, clear entities, trustworthy attribution, structured page sections, and crawler-accessible HTML. These signals improve machine understanding even though they do not guarantee AI citations.

Check name

GEO: Structured extraction

Score

25/100

Status

fail

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for AI answer engines to extract, cite, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

GEO: Structured extraction scored 25/100 and needs a fix.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

GEO: Citable passages

GEO: Citable passages scored 35/100 and needs a fix.

4 Fail

Needs attention

GEO: Citable passages

Failed check
01

Issue

No evidence-backed, citation-length explanatory paragraph was found.

Details

02

Why it matters

Generative answer systems work best with visible, self-contained, evidence-backed content, clear entities, trustworthy attribution, structured page sections, and crawler-accessible HTML. These signals improve machine understanding even though they do not guarantee AI citations.

Check name

GEO: Citable passages

Score

35/100

Status

fail

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for AI answer engines to extract, cite, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

GEO: Citable passages scored 35/100 and needs a fix.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

GEO: Extractable HTML

GEO: Extractable HTML scored 45/100 and needs a fix.

3 Fail

Needs attention

GEO: Extractable HTML

Failed check
01

Issue

Only 7 visible words were found in the initial HTML.

Details

02

Why it matters

Generative answer systems work best with visible, self-contained, evidence-backed content, clear entities, trustworthy attribution, structured page sections, and crawler-accessible HTML. These signals improve machine understanding even though they do not guarantee AI citations.

Check name

GEO: Extractable HTML

Score

45/100

Status

fail

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for AI answer engines to extract, cite, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

GEO: Extractable HTML scored 45/100 and needs a fix.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

GEO: Entity clarity

GEO: Entity clarity scored 60/100 and needs improvement.

2 Warning

Needs attention

GEO: Entity clarity

Warning
01

Issue

Expected exactly one h1, found 0. Missing meta or Open Graph description. Title/H1 terms missing from description: aspire, lifestyles.

Details

02

Why it matters

Generative answer systems work best with visible, self-contained, evidence-backed content, clear entities, trustworthy attribution, structured page sections, and crawler-accessible HTML. These signals improve machine understanding even though they do not guarantee AI citations.

Check name

GEO: Entity clarity

Score

60/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for AI answer engines to extract, cite, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

GEO: Entity clarity scored 60/100 and needs improvement.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

GEO: AI retrieval access

GEO: AI retrieval access scored 75/100 and needs improvement.

1 Warning

Needs attention

GEO: AI retrieval access

Warning
01

Issue

robots.txt was not fetched successfully, so crawler access could not be confirmed.

Details

02

Why it matters

Generative answer systems work best with visible, self-contained, evidence-backed content, clear entities, trustworthy attribution, structured page sections, and crawler-accessible HTML. These signals improve machine understanding even though they do not guarantee AI citations.

Check name

GEO: AI retrieval access

Score

75/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for AI answer engines to extract, cite, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

GEO: AI retrieval access scored 75/100 and needs improvement.

SEOSEOBrowser audit

Document does not have a meta description

100 Fail

Check name

Document does not have a meta description

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Device

desktop

Category

SEO

Fix guidance

Meta descriptions may be included in search results to concisely summarize page content. [Learn more about the meta description](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/seo/meta-description/).

Evidence
{
  "description": "Meta descriptions may be included in search results to concisely summarize page content. [Learn more about the meta description](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/seo/meta-description/)."
}

Sign in to see 41 other issues and the full report

Create a free account to unlock every issue, evidence details, exports, and higher free limits.

Fix with MCP or CLI

Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.

Fix with MCP / CLI

Score history