Export Report
OVERALL SCORE
Level 3, Bot-Aware
- AI Discoverability 64 out of 100
- Agent Ease of Use 60 out of 100
- Security & Trust 98 out of 100
- GEO, AIO and AEO 59 out of 100
- SEO 92 out of 100
- Performance 79 out of 100
- Accessibility 58 out of 100
What AI sees of your website
Australian Clinical Labs | Pathology Services & Collection | ACL
Australian Clinical Labs offers pathology services across Australia. Find a collection centre, access eResults, eRequests and specialised testing near you.
| Metric | Score | Status | Passed | Failed | Warning | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI Discoverability | 64 | Needs work | 29 | 1 | 1 | View details |
| Discoverability | 67 | Needs work | 8 | 0 | 0 | |
| Content Readiness | 62 | Needs work | 18 | 1 | 1 | View details |
| Bot Access Control | 63 | Needs work | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| Agent Ease of Use | 60 | Needs work | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| Skill Discovery | 54 | Needs work | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Google Agentic Browsing | 100 | Strong | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| GEO, AIO and AEO | 59 | Needs work | 6 | 1 | 3 | View details |
| GEO Readiness | 52 | Needs work | 2 | 1 | 3 | View details |
| AIO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| AEO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| SEO | 92 | Strong | 9 | 0 | 0 | |
| SEO | 92 | Strong | 9 | 0 | 0 | |
| Security & Trust | 98 | Strong | 26 | 0 | 0 | |
| Security & Trust | 98 | Strong | 26 | 0 | 0 | |
| Performance | 79 | Mostly ready | 8 | 1 | 0 | View details |
| Performance | 79 | Mostly ready | 8 | 1 | 0 | View details |
Prioritized recommendations
Issues ranked by score impact
6 items need attention
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Author attribution
Author attribution is partially implemented.
45 Warning
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Author attribution
Author attribution is partially implemented.
Needs attention
Author attribution
Issue
No named author or publisher identity could be extracted.
Details
Why it matters
Author attribution helps agents cite content responsibly, assess source credibility, and distinguish editorial pages from anonymous marketing copy.
Check name
Author attribution
Score
55/100
Status
warning
Category
Content Readiness
Maturity
Established
Goal
Identify content authors or publishers for trust and attribution.
Result
Author attribution is partially implemented.
Validation steps
Schema.org attribution
Schema.org attribution is incomplete or relies only on publisher/fallback evidence.
Schema.org author attribution is missing or incomplete
Author identity quality
No named author or publisher identity could be extracted.
Author identity quality is incomplete
Evidence log2 steps · 8 lines
Schema.org attribution [warning]! Schema.org attribution is incomplete or relies only on publisher/fallback evidence.INFOSchema.org attributionINFOChecking structured data for author, creator, and publisher contributorsWARNCheck named Schema.org author count actual=0 expected="> 0" authorCount=0 publisherCount=1 namedContributors=0 authors=[] publishers=[{"role":"publisher","id":"https://clinicallabs.com.au/#organization","sameAs":[],"format":"json-ld","mergedName":false}] formats=["json-ld"]WARNSchema.org attribution is incomplete or fallback-only authorCount=0 publisherCount=1 authors=[] publishers=[{"role":"publisher","id":"https://clinicallabs.com.au/#organization","sameAs":[],"format":"json-ld","mergedName":false}]Author identity quality [fail]! No named author or publisher identity could be extracted.INFOAuthor identity qualityINFOChecking contributors for stable identity signalsFAILCheck identified contributor count actual=0 expected="> 0" namedContributors=0 identifiedContributors=[] unidentifiedContributors=[{"role":"publisher","id":"https://clinicallabs.com.au/#organization","sameAs":[],"format":"json-ld","mergedName":false}]FAILNo named contributor identity could be extracted
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
GEO: Citable passages
GEO: Citable passages scored 0/100 and needs a fix.
9 Fail
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
GEO: Citable passages
GEO: Citable passages scored 0/100 and needs a fix.
Needs attention
GEO: Citable passages
Issue
No evidence-backed, citation-length explanatory paragraph was found.
Details
Why it matters
Generative answer systems work best with visible, self-contained, evidence-backed content, clear entities, trustworthy attribution, structured page sections, and crawler-accessible HTML. These signals improve machine understanding even though they do not guarantee AI citations.
Check name
GEO: Citable passages
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content easy for AI answer engines to extract, cite, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.
Result
GEO: Citable passages scored 0/100 and needs a fix.
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
GEO: Source and trust signals
GEO: Source and trust signals scored 67/100 and needs improvement.
3 Warning
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
GEO: Source and trust signals
GEO: Source and trust signals scored 67/100 and needs improvement.
Needs attention
GEO: Source and trust signals
Issue
Missing source or trust signals: authorOrOwner, freshnessDate.
Details
Why it matters
Generative answer systems work best with visible, self-contained, evidence-backed content, clear entities, trustworthy attribution, structured page sections, and crawler-accessible HTML. These signals improve machine understanding even though they do not guarantee AI citations.
Check name
GEO: Source and trust signals
Score
67/100
Status
warning
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content easy for AI answer engines to extract, cite, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.
Result
GEO: Source and trust signals scored 67/100 and needs improvement.
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
GEO: Entity clarity
GEO: Entity clarity scored 73/100 and needs improvement.
2 Warning
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
GEO: Entity clarity
GEO: Entity clarity scored 73/100 and needs improvement.
Needs attention
GEO: Entity clarity
Issue
Expected exactly one h1, found 5. Title/H1 terms missing from description: acl, focus, winter, issue, available, now.
Details
Why it matters
Generative answer systems work best with visible, self-contained, evidence-backed content, clear entities, trustworthy attribution, structured page sections, and crawler-accessible HTML. These signals improve machine understanding even though they do not guarantee AI citations.
Check name
GEO: Entity clarity
Score
73/100
Status
warning
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content easy for AI answer engines to extract, cite, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.
Result
GEO: Entity clarity scored 73/100 and needs improvement.
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
GEO: Structured extraction
GEO: Structured extraction scored 75/100 and needs improvement.
2 Warning
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
GEO: Structured extraction
GEO: Structured extraction scored 75/100 and needs improvement.
Needs attention
GEO: Structured extraction
Issue
Missing or weak extraction signals: clean heading hierarchy, summary or key takeaways.
Details
Why it matters
Generative answer systems work best with visible, self-contained, evidence-backed content, clear entities, trustworthy attribution, structured page sections, and crawler-accessible HTML. These signals improve machine understanding even though they do not guarantee AI citations.
Check name
GEO: Structured extraction
Score
75/100
Status
warning
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content easy for AI answer engines to extract, cite, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.
Result
GEO: Structured extraction scored 75/100 and needs improvement.
PerformancePerformanceBrowser audit
Font display
100 Fail
PerformancePerformanceBrowser audit
Font display
Check name
Font display
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Device
desktop
Category
Performance
Estimated savings
Est savings of 70 ms
Fix guidance
Consider setting [font-display](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/font-display) to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with [font metric overrides](https://developer.chrome.com/blog/font-fallbacks).
References
web.dev/learn/performanceEvidence
{
"displayValue": "Est savings of 70 ms",
"description": "Consider setting [font-display](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/font-display) to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with [font metric overrides](https://developer.chrome.com/blog/font-fallbacks)."
}Sign in to see 42 other issues and the full report
Create a free account to unlock every issue, evidence details, exports, and higher free limits.
Fix with MCP or CLI
Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.
Score history