Rescan Report
Share Report
Copy Report Link
Rescan Report
Share Report
Copy Report Link
Export Report
52/100

OVERALL SCORE

Level 3, Bot-Aware

Moderate readiness for AI agents
AIDiscoverability46%Agent Easeof Use41%Security& Trust63%GEO, AIO, AEO55%SEO75%Performance& Accessibility67%
  • AI Discoverability 46 out of 100
  • Agent Ease of Use 41 out of 100
  • Security & Trust 63 out of 100
  • GEO, AIO and AEO 55 out of 100
  • SEO 75 out of 100
  • Performance and Accessibility 67 out of 100

CAPTURED SCREENSHOT

Captured website desktop screenshot

What AI sees of your website

Imitate Email: Safe and easy email testing for developers and users favicon

Imitate Email: Safe and easy email testing for developers and users

No more accidentally spamming real people. Ensure emails are sent at the right time, look great and do this inside the software you're building

Next step

Turn this report into a fix workflow

18 failed checks are ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.

Detailed report scores grouped by capability area
MetricScoreStatusPassedFailedWarningEvidence
AI Discoverability
46
Priority fix19255View details
Discoverability
67
Needs work820View details
Content Readiness
33
Priority fix9192View details
Bot Access Control
40
Priority fix243View details
Agent Ease of Use
41
Priority fix111712View details
API
50
Needs work430View details
Auth
34
Priority fix241View details
MCP
37
Priority fix353View details
Skill Discovery
41
Priority fix258View details
GEO, AIO and AEO
55
Needs work5211View details
GEO Readiness
52
Needs work213View details
AIO Readiness
60
Needs work105
AEO Readiness
54
Needs work213View details
SEO
75
Mostly ready630View details
SEO
75
Mostly ready630View details
Security & Trust
63
Needs work1347View details
Security & Trust
63
Needs work1347View details
Performance and Accessibility
67
Needs work1552View details
Performance
58
Needs work952View details
Accessibility
83
Mostly ready600

Prioritized recommendations

Issues ranked by score impact

53 items need attention

AI DiscoverabilityDiscoverabilityEstablished

Link headers

Link headers failed at "Find useful Link headers".

100 Fail

Needs attention

Link headers

Failed check
01

Issue

No useful agent discovery Link headers were found.

02

Why it matters

Link headers let automated clients discover API catalogs, documentation, and machine-readable alternates without parsing page markup first.

Check name

Link headers

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Category

Discoverability

Maturity

Established

Goal

Include Link response headers for agent discovery using RFC 8288.

Result

Link headers failed at "Find useful Link headers".

Validation steps

  1. Find useful Link headers

    No useful agent discovery Link headers were found.

  2. Fetch same-origin Link header targets

    Link headers did not expose any same-origin targets to validate.

Evidence log2 steps · 9 lines
Find useful Link headers [fail]! No useful agent discovery Link headers were found.INFOFind useful Link headersINFOParse response Link header linkCount=0FAILCompare registered agent-useful relation count actual=0 expected="> 0"FAILCompare community relation count actual=0 expected="accepted as weaker evidence"FAILNo useful agent discovery Link headers were found.Fetch same-origin Link header targets [fail]! Link headers did not expose any same-origin targets to validate.INFOFetch same-origin Link header targetsINFOFetch same-origin Link header targets and record external skipsFAILCompare same-origin Link target failures actual=1 expected=0FAILLink headers did not expose any same-origin targets to validate.

Agent Ease of UseAPIEstablished

OpenAPI discovery

OpenAPI discovery failed at "Parse OpenAPI document".

50 Fail

Needs attention

OpenAPI discovery

Failed check
01

Issue

OpenAPI candidate was not parseable as JSON or YAML-like OpenAPI.

02

Why it matters

OpenAPI documents let agents understand operations, schemas, authentication, servers, and request/response formats before calling an API.

Check name

OpenAPI discovery

Score

50/100

Status

fail

Category

API

Maturity

Established

Goal

Publish a valid OpenAPI or Swagger document for public API discovery when this origin exposes public APIs.

Result

OpenAPI discovery failed at "Parse OpenAPI document".

Validation steps

  1. Parse OpenAPI document

    OpenAPI candidate was not parseable as JSON or YAML-like OpenAPI.

  2. Validate OpenAPI shape

    Response is not valid JSON and does not match baseline OpenAPI YAML shape.

  3. Check machine-usable details

    Add servers, parameters, request bodies, response schemas, operation IDs, tags, examples, and security or explicit no-auth declarations where they apply.

Evidence log3 steps · 14 lines
Parse OpenAPI document [fail]! OpenAPI candidate was not parseable as JSON or YAML-like OpenAPI.INFOParse OpenAPI document status="fail"INFOParse selected document as JSON first, then YAML-like OpenAPI parsed=false format="unknown" versionFamily="missing"FAILCheck parse result actual="not parseable" expected="parseable OpenAPI 3.x or Swagger 2.0 document" compatibleContentType=falseFAILOpenAPI candidate was not parseable as JSON or YAML-like OpenAPI.Validate OpenAPI shape [fail]! Response is not valid JSON and does not match baseline OpenAPI YAML shape.INFOValidate OpenAPI shape status="fail"INFOValidate required OpenAPI shape versionFamily="missing" pathCount=0 webhookCount=0 operationCount=0PASSCheck operations define responses actual=0 expected="every operation should define responses"FAILCheck info metadata actual={"hasInfoTitle":false,"hasInfoVersion":false} expected="info.title and info.version present"FAILOpenAPI shape issue issue="Response is not valid JSON and does not match baseline OpenAPI YAML shape."FAILResponse is not valid JSON and does not match baseline OpenAPI YAML shape.Check machine-usable details [fail]INFOCheck machine-usable details status="fail"INFOInspect machine-usable operation details hasServers=false hasSecuritySchemes=false hasExplicitNoAuth=false requestBodyOperationCount=0 parameterOperationCount=0 responseSchemaOperationCount=0 operationIdCount=0 taggedOperationCount=0 exampleOperationCount=0PASSCheck OpenAPI operations include enough detail for agents to call them safely actual="no machine-usability warnings" expected="servers, auth/no-auth signals, operationIds, parameters, request bodies, responses, tags, and examples where relevant"FAILOpenAPI discovery validation failed.

Agent Ease of UseMCPEmerging recommendation

MCP Server Card

MCP Server Card failed at "Validate server-card shape".

35 Fail

Needs attention

MCP Server Card

Failed check
01

Issue

MCP Server Card response is not valid JSON.

02

Why it matters

MCP server cards give agents a stable, public pre-connection discovery surface for server identity, remote transports, protocol compatibility, and safe routing without guessing endpoints.

Check name

MCP Server Card

Score

30/100

Status

fail

Category

MCP

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish an MCP Server Card that helps agents discover remote MCP server transports before opening a session.

Result

MCP Server Card failed at "Validate server-card shape".

Validation steps

  1. Discover MCP server card

    The MCP server card was found only at a transitional or linked path.

  2. Validate server-card shape

    MCP Server Card response is not valid JSON.

  3. Validate MCP remotes

    No usable MCP remote transport was declared.

  4. Validate HTTP delivery

    Content-Type "text/html; charset=utf-8" is not JSON.

  5. Probe same-origin MCP endpoint

    No MCP remote endpoint could be probed.

Evidence log5 steps · 37 lines
Discover MCP server card [warning]! The MCP server card was found only at a transitional or linked path.INFODiscover MCP server card candidateCount=5INFOBuild MCP server-card candidate list currentPath="/.well-known/mcp-server-card" transitionalPaths=["/.well-known/mcp/server-card.json","/.well-known/mcp/server-cards.json","/mcp.json","/.well-known/mcp.json"] linkedPaths=[]INFOTrying to fetch /.well-known/mcp-server-card url="https://imitate.email/.well-known/mcp-server-card" source="current"FAIL/.well-known/mcp-server-card did not return a usable server card statusCode=404 contentType=nullINFOTrying to fetch /.well-known/mcp/server-card.json url="https://imitate.email/.well-known/mcp/server-card.json" source="transitional"FAIL/.well-known/mcp/server-card.json did not return a usable server card statusCode=404 contentType=nullINFOTrying to fetch /.well-known/mcp/server-cards.json url="https://imitate.email/.well-known/mcp/server-cards.json" source="transitional"FAIL/.well-known/mcp/server-cards.json did not return a usable server card statusCode=404 contentType=nullINFOTrying to fetch /mcp.json url="https://imitate.email/mcp.json" source="transitional"PASS/mcp.json returned a successful response statusCode=200 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8" finalUrl="https://imitate.email/mcp.json"INFOTrying to fetch /.well-known/mcp.json url="https://imitate.email/.well-known/mcp.json" source="transitional"FAIL/.well-known/mcp.json did not return a usable server card statusCode=404 contentType=nullWARNCheck selected card is published at the current well-known path actual="/mcp.json" expected="/.well-known/mcp-server-card" source="transitional" finalUrl="https://imitate.email/mcp.json"WARNMCP server card was discovered through a transitional or linked path path="/mcp.json" source="transitional" reason="The MCP server card was found only at a transitional or linked path."Validate server-card shape [fail]! MCP Server Card response is not valid JSON.INFOValidate server-card shape profile="unknown-json"FAILCheck response body parsed as JSON actual=false expected=trueFAILCheck Content-Type is JSON-compatible actual=false expected=trueFAILCheck recognized MCP server-card profile actual="unknown-json" expected="sep-2127-draft"PASSCheck required card fields are present actual=0 expected=0 missing=[]PASSCheck MCP server-card uses the current remotes[] profile without legacy compatibility warnings actual="no compatibility warnings" expected="current sep-2127-draft card shape with no legacy compatibility warnings" warnings=[]FAILMCP server-card shape validation failed reason="MCP Server Card response is not valid JSON."Validate MCP remotes [fail]! No usable MCP remote transport was declared.INFOValidate MCP remotes remoteCount=0FAILCheck at least one MCP remote is declared actual=0 expected="> 0"PASSCheck invalid remote count actual=0 expected=0 invalidRemotes=[]PASSCheck same-origin remote coverage actual=0 expected=0FAILMCP remote validation failed reason="No usable MCP remote transport was declared."Validate HTTP delivery [fail]! Content-Type "text/html; charset=utf-8" is not JSON.INFOValidate HTTP delivery finalUrl="https://imitate.email/mcp.json"PASSCheck server card returned HTTP 2xx actual=200 expected="200-299"FAILCheck card is served as JSON actual="text/html; charset=utf-8" expected="application/json or +json"PASSCheck card is served over HTTPS actual="https:" expected="https:"WARNCheck browser-readable CORS header actual="missing" expected="Access-Control-Allow-Origin present"PASSCheck cache header is present actual="no-cache, no-store" expected="Cache-Control present"FAILMCP server-card HTTP delivery failed issues=["Content-Type \"text/html; charset=utf-8\" is not JSON.","CORS header Access-Control-Allow-Origin is absent."] reason="Content-Type \"text/html; charset=utf-8\" is not JSON."Probe same-origin MCP endpoint [warning]! No MCP remote endpoint could be probed.INFOProbe same-origin MCP endpoint probeCount=0INFOSelecting same-origin unauthenticated MCP remotes for a bounded initialize probeWARNCheck successful initialize probe count actual=0 expected="> 0 when a safe same-origin unauthenticated remote exists" activeProbeCount=0 authBlocked=0WARNMCP endpoint probe could not fully confirm operability reason="No MCP remote endpoint could be probed."

Agent Ease of UseAuthEmerging recommendation

Auth.md Agent Registration

Auth.md Agent Registration failed at "Fetch and validate /auth.md".

30 Fail

Needs attention

Auth.md Agent Registration

Failed check
01

Issue

auth.md response did not match Auth.md v1 agent registration guidance. Content-Type "text/html; charset=utf-8" is not Markdown or text/plain; missing OAuth Protected Resource Metadata discovery guidance; missing OAuth authorization-server metadata guidance; missing Auth.md credential type guidance; missing agent_verified/user_claimed or claim ceremony guidance.

02

Why it matters

Human login and signup flows are often opaque to agents. Auth.md gives automated clients a stable registration contract instead of forcing them to scrape docs, automate browser forms, or guess credential flows.

Check name

Auth.md Agent Registration

Score

10/100

Status

fail

Category

Auth

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish Auth.md v1 metadata so agents can discover how to register, claim a user, and obtain credentials.

Result

Auth.md Agent Registration failed at "Fetch and validate /auth.md".

Validation steps

  1. Fetch and validate /auth.md

    auth.md response did not match Auth.md v1 agent registration guidance. Content-Type "text/html; charset=utf-8" is not Markdown or text/plain; missing OAuth Protected Resource Metadata discovery guidance; missing OAuth authorization-server metadata guidance; missing Auth.md credential type guidance; missing agent_verified/user_claimed or claim ceremony guidance.

  2. Validate protected resource metadata

    OAuth Protected Resource Metadata could not be fetched.

  3. Validate Auth.md authorization metadata

    OAuth authorization-server metadata could not be fetched.

Evidence log3 steps · 20 lines
Fetch and validate /auth.md [fail]! auth.md response did not match Auth.md v1 agent registration guidance. Content-Type "text/html; charset=utf-8" is not Markdown or text/plain; missing OAuth Protected Resource Metadata discovery guidance; missing OAuth authorization-server metadata guidance; missing Auth.md credential type guidance; missing agent_verified/user_claimed or claim ceremony guidance.INFOFetch and validate /auth.mdINFOFetch Auth.md-related resource path="/auth.md" statusCode=200 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8" bytes=65461FAILCompare response Content-Type with expected Auth.md media type actual=false expected=trueFAILCompare Auth.md/OAuth metadata validation result actual=false expected=trueFAILCompare Auth.md content length actual=47254 expected=">= 80 characters"WARNAuth.md validation warning warning="missing agent_verified/user_claimed or claim ceremony guidance"FAILAuth.md validation issue issue="auth.md response did not match Auth.md v1 agent registration guidance. Content-Type \"text/html; charset=utf-8\" is not Markdown or text/plain; missing OAuth Protected Resource Metadata discovery guidance; missing OAuth authorization-server metadata guidance; missing Auth.md credential type guidance; missing agent_verified/user_claimed or claim ceremony guidance."FAILauth.md response did not match Auth.md v1 agent registration guidance. Content-Type "text/html; charset=utf-8" is not Markdown or text/plain; missing OAuth Protected Resource Metadata discovery guidance; missing OAuth authorization-server metadata guidance; missing Auth.md credential type guidance; missing agent_verified/user_claimed or claim ceremony guidance.Validate protected resource metadata [fail]! OAuth Protected Resource Metadata could not be fetched.INFOValidate protected resource metadataINFOFetch Auth.md-related resource path="/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource" statusCode=404 contentType=null bytes=0FAILCompare response Content-Type with expected Auth.md media type actual=false expected=trueFAILCompare Auth.md/OAuth metadata validation result actual=false expected=trueFAILAuth.md validation issue issue="OAuth Protected Resource Metadata could not be fetched."FAILOAuth Protected Resource Metadata could not be fetched.Validate Auth.md authorization metadata [fail]! OAuth authorization-server metadata could not be fetched.INFOValidate Auth.md authorization metadataINFOFetch Auth.md-related resource path="/.well-known/oauth-authorization-server" statusCode=404 contentType=null bytes=0FAILCompare response Content-Type with expected Auth.md media type actual=false expected=trueFAILCompare Auth.md/OAuth metadata validation result actual=false expected=trueFAILAuth.md validation issue issue="OAuth authorization-server metadata could not be fetched."FAILOAuth authorization-server metadata could not be fetched.

Agent Ease of UseMCPEmerging recommendation

WebMCP

WebMCP failed at "Probe WebMCP operability".

28 Fail

Needs attention

WebMCP

Failed check
01

Issue

Discovered WebMCP static metadata was fetchable but invalid.

Details

02

Why it matters

WebMCP gives agents structured page and browser tool hints so they can understand actions without relying only on screen scraping.

Check name

WebMCP

Score

44/100

Status

fail

Category

MCP

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Expose browser/page WebMCP tools and compatible static WebMCP metadata when a site wants agents to understand in-page actions.

Result

WebMCP failed at "Probe WebMCP operability".

Validation steps

  1. Detect WebMCP runtime API

    WebMCP-like strings were found, but rendered browser evidence did not confirm a usable runtime API.

  2. Probe WebMCP operability

    Discovered WebMCP static metadata was fetchable but invalid.

    WebMCP operability findings
    • Discovered WebMCP static metadata was fetchable but invalid.
  3. Validate declarative WebMCP form tools

    No W3C-style declarative WebMCP form attributes were found.

  4. Validate MCP-aware HTML annotations

    No data-mcp-tool or hyphenated WebMCP compatibility annotations were found.

  5. Validate static WebMCP JSON compatibility

    A discovered WebMCP static manifest or WMCP interaction graph was invalid.

    Body is not valid JSON.

Evidence log5 steps · 23 lines
Detect WebMCP runtime API [warning]! WebMCP-like strings were found, but rendered browser evidence did not confirm a usable runtime API.INFODetect WebMCP runtime API status="warning"INFOProbe rendered browser for WebMCP runtime objects WARNCheck current W3C runtime API actual="not detected" expected="document.modelContext/registerTool available"WARNWebMCP-like strings were found, but rendered browser evidence did not confirm a usable runtime API.Probe WebMCP operability [fail]! Discovered WebMCP static metadata was fetchable but invalid.INFOProbe WebMCP operability status="fail"INFORun safe WebMCP operability checks safeProbeOnly=trueFAILCheck usable WebMCP evidence actual=0 expected="at least 1 usable runtime, declarative, annotation, or static manifest signal"FAILWebMCP operability failure issue="Discovered WebMCP static metadata was fetchable but invalid."FAILDiscovered WebMCP static metadata was fetchable but invalid.Validate declarative WebMCP form tools [informational]! No W3C-style declarative WebMCP form attributes were found.INFOValidate declarative WebMCP form tools status="informational"INFOInspect visible forms and controls for current declarative WebMCP attributes annotatedElements=0 formsWithAttributes=0 controlsWithAttributes=0SKIPValidate declarative WebMCP attribute quality actual=0 expected=0INFONo W3C-style declarative WebMCP form attributes were found. status="informational"Validate MCP-aware HTML annotations [informational]! No data-mcp-tool or hyphenated WebMCP compatibility annotations were found.INFOValidate MCP-aware HTML annotations status="informational"INFOInspect HTML for MCP compatibility annotations compatibilityAttributeCount=0 dataMcpToolCount=0 examples=[]SKIPValidate compatibility annotation quality actual=0 expected=0INFONo data-mcp-tool or hyphenated WebMCP compatibility annotations were found. status="informational"Validate static WebMCP JSON compatibility [fail]! A discovered WebMCP static manifest or WMCP interaction graph was invalid.INFOValidate static WebMCP JSON compatibility status="fail"INFODiscover static WebMCP manifest candidates conventionalPaths=["/.well-known/webmcp.json","/webmcp.json"] checkedCount=2 profileCounts={"unknown-webmcp-json":1}INFOWebMCP manifest candidate checked source="path" path="/.well-known/webmcp.json" url="https://imitate.email/.well-known/webmcp.json" statusCode=404 contentType=nullPASSWebMCP manifest candidate found source="path" path="/webmcp.json" url="https://imitate.email/webmcp.json" statusCode=200 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8"FAILValidate discovered static WebMCP metadata actual={"validManifestCount":0,"invalidManifestCount":1,"toolCount":0,"wmcpActionCount":0} expected="at least 1 valid tools[] manifest or WMCP graph when static metadata is present"FAILA discovered WebMCP static manifest or WMCP interaction graph was invalid.

Agent Ease of UseAuthEstablished

OAuth / OIDC discovery

OAuth / OIDC discovery failed at "Fetch discovery metadata".

19 Fail

Needs attention

OAuth / OIDC discovery

Failed check
01

Issue

OAuth/OIDC was claimed or referenced, but no registered OAuth/OIDC discovery document was found.

02

Why it matters

OAuth and OIDC discovery let agents and API clients find authorization, token, and key endpoints programmatically instead of scraping login pages or guessing provider setup.

Check name

OAuth / OIDC discovery

Score

43/100

Status

fail

Category

Auth

Maturity

Established

Goal

Publish OAuth/OIDC discovery metadata only when the site operates or advertises a real OAuth/OIDC authorization server.

Result

OAuth / OIDC discovery failed at "Fetch discovery metadata".

Validation steps

  1. Fetch discovery metadata

    OAuth/OIDC was claimed or referenced, but no registered OAuth/OIDC discovery document was found.

Evidence log1 step · 6 lines
Fetch discovery metadata [fail]! OAuth/OIDC was claimed or referenced, but no registered OAuth/OIDC discovery document was found.INFOFetch discovery metadataINFOTrying OAuth/OIDC well-known metadata candidates checkedCount=2INFOChecked discovery candidate path="/.well-known/openid-configuration" statusCode=404 contentType=null length=0INFOChecked discovery candidate path="/.well-known/oauth-authorization-server" statusCode=404 contentType=null length=0FAILCheck discovery metadata fetch succeeded actual=2 expected="HTTP 2xx JSON metadata document"FAILFetch discovery metadata failed issue="OAuth/OIDC was claimed or referenced, but no registered OAuth/OIDC discovery document was found."

Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation

agents.json

agents.json failed at "Validate Wildcard schema shape".

19 Fail

Needs attention

agents.json

Failed check
01

Issue

agents.json response is not valid JSON.

02

Why it matters

Wildcard agents.json gives agents workflow-level context beyond plain OpenAPI, including flows, links, examples, and API action structure. It is an emerging OpenAPI-adjacent proposal, so scanners should validate the contract shape without treating it as an A2A or IETF standard.

Check name

agents.json

Score

25/100

Status

fail

Category

Skill Discovery

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish a Wildcard-style agents.json file so agents can discover OpenAPI-backed workflows, links, examples, and authentication requirements.

Result

agents.json failed at "Validate Wildcard schema shape".

Validation steps

  1. Discover agents.json

    agents.json was found only at the fallback /agents.json path.

  2. Validate Wildcard schema shape

    agents.json response is not valid JSON.

  3. Validate API actions

    Wildcard agents.json must include valid OpenAPI-derived action or operation definitions.

  4. Validate flows and links

    No executable flows were found.

  5. Review examples and LLM usability

    Examples or descriptions are too thin for reliable agent argument generation.

Evidence log5 steps · 23 lines
Discover agents.json [warning]! agents.json was found only at the fallback /agents.json path.INFODiscover agents.jsonINFOTry agents.json discovery paths in priority order paths=["/.well-known/agents.json","/agents.json"]WARNagents.json candidate path did not return a usable contract path="/.well-known/agents.json" statusCode=404 contentType=nullPASSFound an agents.json candidate path="/agents.json" statusCode=200 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8" bytes=65469WARNSelected fallback agents.json location path="/agents.json" requestedUrl="https://imitate.email/agents.json"WARNagents.json was found only at the fallback /agents.json path.Validate Wildcard schema shape [fail]! agents.json response is not valid JSON.INFOValidate Wildcard schema shapeINFOParse agents.json and classify contract shape shape="unknown"FAILCompare contract shape actual="unknown" expected="wildcard"FAILCompare missing required schema fields actual="none" expected="none"FAILCompare Content-Type with JSON expectation actual=false expected=trueFAILagents.json response is not valid JSON.Validate API actions [fail]! Wildcard agents.json must include valid OpenAPI-derived action or operation definitions.INFOValidate API actionsFAILCompare API action count actual=0 expected="> 0"FAILCompare invalid action definitions actual=0 expected=0FAILWildcard agents.json must include valid OpenAPI-derived action or operation definitions.Validate flows and links [fail]! No executable flows were found.INFOValidate flows and linksFAILCompare workflow flow count actual=0 expected="> 0"FAILCompare operation link issues actual=0 expected=0FAILNo executable flows were found.Review examples and LLM usability [warning]! Examples or descriptions are too thin for reliable agent argument generation.INFOReview examples and LLM usabilityWARNCompare usable example count actual=0 expected="> 0 when actions are present"WARNExamples or descriptions are too thin for reliable agent argument generation.

AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished

Organization / WebSite schema

Organization / WebSite schema is missing or incomplete.

17 Fail

Needs attention

Organization / WebSite schema

Failed check
01

Issue

No Organization or Organization subtype was found in Schema.org structured data. No WebSite entity was found in Schema.org structured data. Missing identity field(s): Organization.name, Organization.url, WebSite.name, WebSite.url. WebSite.publisher is missing. Organization schema is missing logo and sameAs or public contact evidence.

02

Why it matters

Organization and WebSite schema help agents identify the publisher, canonical site identity, logo, and related profiles for attribution.

Check name

Organization / WebSite schema

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Category

Content Readiness

Maturity

Established

Goal

Identify the site owner and website entity in structured data.

Result

Organization / WebSite schema is missing or incomplete.

Validation steps

  1. Organization entity

    No Organization or Organization subtype was found in Schema.org structured data.

  2. WebSite entity

    No WebSite entity was found in Schema.org structured data.

  3. Identity fields

    Missing identity field(s): Organization.name, Organization.url, WebSite.name, WebSite.url.

  4. WebSite publisher linkage

    WebSite.publisher is missing.

  5. Organization trust fields

    Organization schema is missing logo and sameAs or public contact evidence.

Evidence log5 steps · 23 lines
Organization entity [fail]! No Organization or Organization subtype was found in Schema.org structured data.INFOOrganization entityINFOLooking for Organization or Organization subtype in structured data observedTypes=[]FAILCheck Organization entity presence actual=false expected=true fields=[{"name":"Organization.@type","present":false},{"name":"Organization.@id","present":false},{"name":"Organization.name","present":false},{"name":"Organization.url","present":false},{"name":"Organization.logo","present":false},{"name":"Organization.sameAs","present":false}]FAILOrganization entity is missingWebSite entity [fail]! No WebSite entity was found in Schema.org structured data.INFOWebSite entityINFOLooking for WebSite entity in structured data FAILCheck WebSite entity presence actual=false expected=true fields=[{"name":"WebSite.@type","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.@id","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.name","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.url","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.publisher.@id","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.publisher.name","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.publisher.url","present":false}]FAILWebSite entity is missingIdentity fields [fail]! Missing identity field(s): Organization.name, Organization.url, WebSite.name, WebSite.url.INFOIdentity fieldsINFOChecking Organization and WebSite name/url fields FAILCheck required identity fields actual=0 expected=4 missing=["Organization.name","Organization.url","WebSite.name","WebSite.url"] organizationFields=[{"name":"Organization.@type","present":false},{"name":"Organization.@id","present":false},{"name":"Organization.name","present":false},{"name":"Organization.url","present":false},{"name":"Organization.logo","present":false},{"name":"Organization.sameAs","present":false}] websiteFields=[{"name":"WebSite.@type","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.@id","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.name","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.url","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.publisher.@id","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.publisher.name","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.publisher.url","present":false}]WARNCheck identity URLs match scanned origin actual={"organizationUrlMatchesOrigin":false,"websiteUrlMatchesOrigin":false} expected={"organizationUrlMatchesOrigin":true,"websiteUrlMatchesOrigin":true}FAILIdentity fields are missing missing=["Organization.name","Organization.url","WebSite.name","WebSite.url"]WebSite publisher linkage [fail]! WebSite.publisher is missing.INFOWebSite publisher linkageINFOChecking whether WebSite.publisher points to the Organization entity FAILCheck publisher presence actual=false expected=true publisher={"present":false,"matchesOrganization":false} website={} organization={}FAILCheck publisher matches Organization actual=false expected=trueFAILWebSite publisher is missingOrganization trust fields [fail]! Organization schema is missing logo and sameAs or public contact evidence.INFOOrganization trust fieldsINFOChecking logo, sameAs, and public contact evidence FAILCheck logo presence actual=false expected=true fields=[{"name":"Organization.logo","present":false},{"name":"Organization.sameAs","present":false},{"name":"Organization.contactPoint","present":false},{"name":"Organization.telephone","present":false},{"name":"Organization.email","present":false},{"name":"Organization.address","present":false}]FAILCheck sameAs or contact evidence actual=0 expected=">= 1" sameAsCount=0 contactSignalCount=0 fields=[{"name":"Organization.logo","present":false},{"name":"Organization.sameAs","present":false},{"name":"Organization.contactPoint","present":false},{"name":"Organization.telephone","present":false},{"name":"Organization.email","present":false},{"name":"Organization.address","present":false}]FAILOrganization trust fields are missing

AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished

Structured data

Structured data failed at "Recognized structured data format".

17 Fail

Needs attention

Structured data

Failed check
01

Issue

No JSON-LD, Microdata, or RDFa structured data was found.

02

Why it matters

Structured data gives agents explicit entities, relationships, and page meaning that are harder to infer reliably from visual layout alone.

Check name

Structured data

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Category

Content Readiness

Maturity

Established

Goal

Expose machine-readable page entities and relationships through a recognized structured-data syntax.

Result

Structured data failed at "Recognized structured data format".

Validation steps

  1. Recognized structured data format

    No JSON-LD, Microdata, or RDFa structured data was found.

  2. Page-relevant schema family

    The page has specific visible content intent, but structured data does not include a matching primary schema family.

Evidence log2 steps · 8 lines
Recognized structured data format [fail]! No JSON-LD, Microdata, or RDFa structured data was found.INFORecognized structured data formatINFODetecting JSON-LD, Microdata, and RDFa in the page HTMLFAILCheck recognized structured-data formats found actual=0 expected="> 0" formatsFound=[]FAILNo recognized structured-data format foundPage-relevant schema family [fail]! The page has specific visible content intent, but structured data does not include a matching primary schema family.INFOPage-relevant schema familyINFOInferring specific page intent and comparing it with detected Schema.org typesFAILCheck schema types matching specific visible page intent actual=0 expected="> 0" inferredIntents=["software"] expectedTypes=["SoftwareApplication","WebApplication","MobileApplication"] matchingTypes=[] observedTypes=[]FAILNo primary schema family matches the inferred page intent expectedTypes=["SoftwareApplication","WebApplication","MobileApplication"] primaryTypes=[]

Agent Ease of UseAuthEmerging recommendation

OAuth Protected Resource

OAuth Protected Resource has a validation warning at "Detect protected-resource applicability".

17 Warning

Needs attention

OAuth Protected Resource

Warning
01

Issue

Generic authentication signals were found, but no OAuth Protected Resource metadata signal was detected.

02

Why it matters

Protected-resource metadata tells agents which API/resource is locked, which authorization servers can issue tokens for it, and how a 401 challenge maps back to the correct resource.

Check name

OAuth Protected Resource

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

Auth

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish OAuth Protected Resource Metadata for OAuth-protected APIs and MCP resources so clients can identify the resource and its authorization servers.

Result

OAuth Protected Resource has a validation warning at "Detect protected-resource applicability".

Validation steps

  1. Detect protected-resource applicability

    Generic authentication signals were found, but no OAuth Protected Resource metadata signal was detected.

Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Detect protected-resource applicability [warning]! Generic authentication signals were found, but no OAuth Protected Resource metadata signal was detected.INFODetect protected-resource applicabilityINFOInspecting auth headers, MCP/OAuth claims, and protected-resource hints applies=false requiresAuthorizationServers=false signalsCount=0 genericAuthSignalsCount=5 checkedCount=1WARNCheck protected-resource metadata applicability actual=false expected="true when RFC 9728 metadata exists or support is claimed" checked=[{"url":"https://imitate.email/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource","path":"/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource","source":"root-well-known","resourceIdentifier":"https://imitate.email","statusCode":404,"contentType":null,"length":0}]WARNDetect protected-resource applicability completed with warnings issue="Generic authentication signals were found, but no OAuth Protected Resource metadata signal was detected."

AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEmerging recommendation

ai.txt policy

ai.txt policy failed at "Validate transport".

16 Fail

Needs attention

ai.txt policy

Failed check
01

Issue

ai.txt appears to be an HTML page or error document rather than a plain-text policy.

02

Why it matters

ai.txt is a fragmented emerging convention. It can communicate human-readable AI crawling, training, attribution, restriction, and contact guidance, but it is not a standard access-control mechanism and absence should not be penalized.

Check name

ai.txt policy

Score

20/100

Status

fail

Category

Bot Access Control

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish an advisory human-readable AI usage policy only when the site intentionally needs one.

Result

ai.txt policy failed at "Validate transport".

Validation steps

  1. Validate transport

    ai.txt appears to be an HTML page or error document rather than a plain-text policy.

  2. Parse ai.txt policy

    Transport validation failed before policy parsing could be trusted.

  3. Validate policy content

    ai.txt appears to expose secrets, tokens, or credentials.

Evidence log3 steps · 14 lines
Validate transport [fail]! ai.txt appears to be an HTML page or error document rather than a plain-text policy.INFOValidate transportINFOChecking ai.txt media type, size, line count, and whether the response looks like plain text contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8" length=65459 lineCount=808FAILCompare media type to preferred text/plain transport actual="text/html" expected="text/plain preferred; readable text required"FAILai.txt appears to be an HTML page or error document rather than a plain-text policy.Parse ai.txt policy [fail]! Transport validation failed before policy parsing could be trusted.INFOParse ai.txt policyINFODetecting ai.txt convention from bracket sections, frontmatter, headings, and ai.txt context linksINFODetected policy structure convention="unknown-text" sections=[] markdownHeadings=[]WARNCheck AI Visibility required sections actual="missing identity, permissions, restrictions" expected="identity, permissions, and restrictions" missingRecommended=["attribution","contact","content-types"]WARNTransport validation failed before policy parsing could be trusted.Validate policy content [fail]! ai.txt appears to expose secrets, tokens, or credentials.INFOValidate policy contentINFOChecking required section content, permission/restriction language, attribution, contact details, and safety risks convention="unknown-text"INFODetected policy signals hasPermissionLanguage=true hasRestrictionLanguage=true hasTrainingLanguage=false hasAttributionLanguage=true hasContact=falseFAILCheck required and recommended section coverage actual={"missingRequired":["identity","permissions","restrictions"],"missingRecommended":["attribution","contact","content-types"]} expected={"missingRequired":[],"recommendedPresentWhenPossible":true}FAILai.txt appears to expose secrets, tokens, or credentials. possibleSecrets=["/ai.txt: Public metadata appears to expose a secret detected by Betterleaks. match=\"generic-api-key\" snippet=\"VG8A...N57g\""]

Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation

A2A Agent Card

A2A Agent Card failed at "Detect A2A card version".

15 Fail

Needs attention

A2A Agent Card

Failed check
01

Issue

The discovered JSON document does not match a supported A2A Agent Card version family.

02

Why it matters

A2A Agent Cards provide protocol-specific discovery for agent identity, skills, input and output modes, transport bindings, capabilities, and security requirements. Legacy A2A also used /.well-known/agent.json, so scanners must classify the card shape before reporting readiness.

Check name

A2A Agent Card

Score

39/100

Status

fail

Category

Skill Discovery

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish a version-appropriate A2A Agent Card so A2A-compatible clients can discover agent skills and invoke the declared endpoint safely.

Result

A2A Agent Card failed at "Detect A2A card version".

Validation steps

  1. Discover A2A Agent Card

    The A2A Agent Card was found at a legacy or fallback path.

  2. Detect A2A card version

    The discovered JSON document does not match a supported A2A Agent Card version family.

  3. Validate version-specific card shape

    A2A Agent Card response is not valid JSON.

  4. Validate HTTP delivery

    The card was parseable JSON but was not served with a JSON-compatible content type.

  5. Probe same-origin A2A endpoint

    A2A endpoint probing was skipped because the endpoint was cross-origin, unavailable from the card, or uses an unsupported binding.

Evidence log5 steps · 26 lines
Discover A2A Agent Card [warning]! The A2A Agent Card was found at a legacy or fallback path.INFODiscover A2A Agent CardINFOTry A2A discovery paths in priority order paths=["/.well-known/agent-card.json","/.well-known/agent.json","/agent-card.json","/.well-known/a2a/agent-card.json"]WARNA2A candidate path did not return a usable card path="/.well-known/agent-card.json" statusCode=404 contentType=nullWARNA2A candidate path did not return a usable card path="/.well-known/agent.json" statusCode=404 contentType=nullPASSFound an A2A candidate path="/agent-card.json" statusCode=200 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8" bytes=65477WARNA2A candidate path did not return a usable card path="/.well-known/a2a/agent-card.json" statusCode=404 contentType=nullWARNSelected non-canonical A2A Agent Card path="/agent-card.json" pathClass="fallback" requestedUrl="https://imitate.email/agent-card.json"WARNThe A2A Agent Card was found at a legacy or fallback path.Detect A2A card version [fail]! The discovered JSON document does not match a supported A2A Agent Card version family.INFODetect A2A card versionINFORead version indicators from the card detectionEvidence=[]FAILCompare detected A2A version family actual="unknown" expected="v0.1, v0.2, v0.3, or v1"FAILThe discovered JSON document does not match a supported A2A Agent Card version family.Validate version-specific card shape [fail]! A2A Agent Card response is not valid JSON.INFOValidate version-specific card shapeFAILCompare missing required card fields actual="none" expected="none"FAILCheck every declared A2A skill has required name, description, and endpoint fields actual=0 expected=0 invalidSkills=[]INFOReview declared endpoint interfaces interfaces=[]FAILA2A Agent Card response is not valid JSON.Validate HTTP delivery [warning]! The card was parseable JSON but was not served with a JSON-compatible content type.INFOValidate HTTP deliveryWARNCompare card Content-Type with JSON expectation actual="text/html; charset=utf-8" expected="application/json or +json"INFOReview selected discovery path path="/agent-card.json" pathClass="fallback"WARNHTTP delivery/path warning warning="card was found only at a non-standard fallback path"WARNThe card was parseable JSON but was not served with a JSON-compatible content type.Probe same-origin A2A endpoint [warning]! A2A endpoint probing was skipped because the endpoint was cross-origin, unavailable from the card, or uses an unsupported binding.INFOProbe same-origin A2A endpointINFOProbe same-origin A2A endpoint when scanner policy allows itSKIPSkipped endpoint probe reason="No valid A2A card was available to probe."WARNA2A endpoint probing was skipped because the endpoint was cross-origin, unavailable from the card, or uses an unsupported binding.

AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished

Markdown negotiation

Markdown negotiation is missing or incomplete.

15 Fail

Needs attention

Markdown negotiation

Failed check
01

Issue

Best candidate returned Content-Type "text/html; charset=utf-8" instead of text/markdown.

02

Why it matters

Markdown representations give agents a cleaner page form while preserving normal HTML for browsers and cache-safe representation handling.

Check name

Markdown negotiation

Score

10/100

Status

fail

Category

Content Readiness

Maturity

Established

Goal

Expose a useful Markdown representation through negotiation or an explicit alternate URL.

Result

Markdown negotiation is missing or incomplete.

Validation steps

  1. Markdown representation

    No usable Markdown representation was found through negotiation, advertised alternates, or conservative .md mirror checks.

  2. Same-URL negotiation

    Same-URL Accept: text/markdown did not return a valid Markdown representation.

  3. Markdown format validation

    Markdown response contains too much raw HTML to be a clean agent-facing Markdown representation.

  4. Advertised Markdown alternate

    No Link or HTML rel=alternate text/markdown URL was advertised.

  5. Conventional .md mirror

    Conventional .md mirror candidates did not return valid Markdown.

Evidence log5 steps · 15 lines
Markdown representation [fail]! No usable Markdown representation was found through negotiation, advertised alternates, or conservative .md mirror checks.INFOMarkdown representationFAILCheck usable Markdown representation was selected actual={"source":"negotiated","url":"https://imitate.email/","statusCode":200,"contentType":"text/html; charset=utf-8","mediaType":"text/html","vary":"","requireVaryAccept":true,"contentTypeStatus":"fail","cacheStatus":"fail","bodyStatus":"fail","pass":false,"quality":{"valid":false,"formatStatus":"fail","dialect":"html-heavy","hasHeading":false,"headingCount":0,"wordCount":8163,"features":{"markdownLinks":0,"referenceLinks":0,"listItems":0,"tables":0,"taskListItems":0,"fencedCodeBlocks":0,"yamlFrontmatter":false,"jsonLdFencedBlocks":0,"admonitions":0,"strikethrough":0,"autolinks":0,"rawHtmlTags":494,"jsxOrMdxSignals":0},"issues":["missing-heading","raw-html-heavy","plain-text-like"],"excerpt":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html lang=\"en\" class=\"h-full scroll-smooth\">\n<head>\n\n    <title>Imitate Email: Safe and easy email testing for developers and users</title>\n        <meta name=\"description\" content=\"No more accidentally spamming real people","issue":"Markdown response contains too much raw HTML to be a clean agent-facing Markdown representation."}} expected="negotiated, advertised alternate, or conventional mirror" selected={"source":"negotiated","url":"https://imitate.email/","statusCode":200,"contentType":"text/html; charset=utf-8","mediaType":"text/html","vary":"","requireVaryAccept":true,"contentTypeStatus":"fail","cacheStatus":"fail","bodyStatus":"fail","pass":false,"quality":{"valid":false,"formatStatus":"fail","dialect":"html-heavy","hasHeading":false,"headingCount":0,"wordCount":8163,"features":{"markdownLinks":0,"referenceLinks":0,"listItems":0,"tables":0,"taskListItems":0,"fencedCodeBlocks":0,"yamlFrontmatter":false,"jsonLdFencedBlocks":0,"admonitions":0,"strikethrough":0,"autolinks":0,"rawHtmlTags":494,"jsxOrMdxSignals":0},"issues":["missing-heading","raw-html-heavy","plain-text-like"],"excerpt":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html lang=\"en\" class=\"h-full scroll-smooth\">\n<head>\n\n    <title>Imitate Email: Safe and easy email testing for developers and users</title>\n        <meta name=\"description\" content=\"No more accidentally spamming real people","issue":"Markdown response contains too much raw HTML to be a clean agent-facing Markdown representation."}} candidatesChecked=2FAILMarkdown representation failed issue="No usable Markdown representation was found through negotiation, advertised alternates, or conservative .md mirror checks."Same-URL negotiation [fail]! Same-URL Accept: text/markdown did not return a valid Markdown representation.INFOSame-URL negotiationFAILCheck negotiated Markdown response actual={"statusCode":200,"mediaType":"text/html","vary":""} expected="HTTP 2xx text/markdown with Vary: Accept" url="https://imitate.email/" statusCode=200 mediaType="text/html"FAILSame-URL negotiation failed issue="Same-URL Accept: text/markdown did not return a valid Markdown representation."Markdown format validation [fail]! Markdown response contains too much raw HTML to be a clean agent-facing Markdown representation.INFOMarkdown format validationFAILCheck Markdown body quality actual={"valid":false,"wordCount":8163,"headingCount":0,"dialect":"html-heavy"} expected="valid Markdown with substantive text and headings" valid=false dialect="html-heavy" wordCount=8163 headingCount=0FAILMarkdown format validation failed issue="Markdown response contains too much raw HTML to be a clean agent-facing Markdown representation."Advertised Markdown alternate [warning]! No Link or HTML rel=alternate text/markdown URL was advertised.INFOAdvertised Markdown alternateWARNCheck advertised Markdown alternate candidates actual=0 expected="> 0 when HTML advertises a Markdown alternate" advertisedUrls=[] candidateCount=0WARNAdvertised Markdown alternate has a warning issue="No Link or HTML rel=alternate text/markdown URL was advertised."Conventional .md mirror [fail]! Conventional .md mirror candidates did not return valid Markdown.INFOConventional .md mirrorFAILCheck conventional Markdown mirror candidates actual=1 expected="> 0 when a conventional mirror is discoverable" conventionalUrls=["https://imitate.email/index.html.md"] candidateCount=1FAILConventional .md mirror failed issue="Conventional .md mirror candidates did not return valid Markdown."

AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEstablished

AI bot rules in robots.txt

AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".

14 Fail

Needs attention

AI bot rules in robots.txt

Failed check
01

Issue

No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.

02

Why it matters

AI crawler product tokens have different meanings. Explicit robots.txt groups make training, search, and retrieval access policy auditable for compliant crawler operators.

Check name

AI bot rules in robots.txt

Score

31/100

Status

fail

Category

Bot Access Control

Maturity

Established

Goal

Declare deliberate robots.txt rules for major AI training, AI search, user-triggered, and dataset crawlers.

Result

AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".

Validation steps

  1. Classify AI crawler rules

    No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.

Evidence log1 step · 6 lines
Classify AI crawler rules [fail]! No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.INFOClassify AI crawler rulesINFOParsing User-agent groups and Allow/Disallow records for known AI crawler tokens evaluatedPath="/"INFOEvaluating exact User-agent matches before wildcard fallback exactAiPolicyCount=0 totalCrawlerTokens=18FAILNo explicit AI crawler User-agent groups were found examplesExpected=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ClaudeBot","Google-Extended","CCBot"]FAILCompare explicit AI crawler coverage actual=0 expected="> 0 explicit non-search AI crawler policies" missingTokens=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ChatGPT-User","ClaudeBot","Claude-SearchBot","Claude-User","Google-Extended","Applebot-Extended","Amazonbot","Amzn-SearchBot","Amzn-User","PerplexityBot"]INFOResolved effective root-path policy for crawler tokens blocked=0 allowed=21 unspecified=0

Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished

Referrer-Policy

Referrer-Policy failed at "Find Referrer-Policy header".

13 Fail

Needs attention

Referrer-Policy

Failed check
01

Issue

Referrer-Policy header is missing.

02

Why it matters

Referrer-Policy controls how much URL context is sent to other origins, limiting accidental leakage of paths, queries, and identifiers.

Check name

Referrer-Policy

Score

33/100

Status

fail

Category

Security & Trust

Maturity

Established

Goal

Limit how much referrer data leaves the site with an explicit Referrer-Policy header.

Result

Referrer-Policy failed at "Find Referrer-Policy header".

Validation steps

  1. Find Referrer-Policy header

    Referrer-Policy header is missing.

  2. Review observed browser responses

    One or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit Referrer-Policy.

Evidence log2 steps · 8 lines
Find Referrer-Policy header [fail]! Referrer-Policy header is missing.INFOFind Referrer-Policy headerINFORead Referrer-Policy delivery header="referrer-policy" value="missing" metaReferrerPolicyCount=0 browserDefault="strict-origin-when-cross-origin"FAILRequire explicit HTTP Referrer-Policy header actual="missing" expected="HTTP response header present" issue="Referrer-Policy header is missing."FAILReferrer-Policy header is missing.Review observed browser responses [warning]! One or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit Referrer-Policy.INFOReview observed browser responsesINFOSample Chrome-observed same-origin responses observedResponseCount=61 sameOriginCount=34 htmlDocumentCount=4WARNCompare observed Referrer-Policy coverage actual={"missingPolicyCount":4,"unsafeOrInvalidPolicyCount":0,"weakPolicyCount":0,"affected":[{"url":"https://imitate.email/","status":200,"resourceType":"document","contentType":"text/html; charset=utf-8","referrerPolicy":null,"classification":"invalid"},{"url":"https://imitate.email/Web/Auth","status":200,"resourceType":"fetch","contentType":"text/html; charset=utf-8","referrerPolicy":null,"classification":"invalid"},{"url":"https://imitate.email/demo","status":200,"resourceType":"fetch","contentType":"text/html; charset=utf-8","referrerPolicy":null,"classification":"invalid"},{"url":"https://imitate.email/imitate/Widget?projectName=Imitate&mailboxId=Demo","status":200,"resourceType":"document","contentType":"text/html; charset=utf-8","referrerPolicy":null,"classification":"invalid"}]} expected="0 missing, unsafe, invalid, or weak same-origin HTML responses" issue="One or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit Referrer-Policy."WARNOne or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit Referrer-Policy.

Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation

Agent Skills index

Agent Skills index has a validation warning at "Discover Agent Skills index".

13 Warning

Needs attention

Agent Skills index

Warning
01

Issue

No Agent Skills discovery index was found at the canonical or legacy path.

02

Why it matters

An Agent Skills index lets agents discover task-specific instructions through a small trusted index, then verify and load only the skill artifacts they need.

Check name

Agent Skills index

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

Skill Discovery

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish an Agent Skills discovery index that advertises digest-pinned SKILL.md or archive artifacts.

Result

Agent Skills index has a validation warning at "Discover Agent Skills index".

Validation steps

  1. Discover Agent Skills index

    No Agent Skills discovery index was found at the canonical or legacy path.

Evidence log1 step · 5 lines
Discover Agent Skills index [warning]! No Agent Skills discovery index was found at the canonical or legacy path.INFODiscover Agent Skills indexINFOTry Agent Skills index paths in priority order paths=["/.well-known/agent-skills/index.json","/.well-known/skills/index.json"]WARNAgent Skills index candidate was not usable path="/.well-known/agent-skills/index.json" url="https://imitate.email/.well-known/agent-skills/index.json" statusCode=404WARNAgent Skills index candidate was not usable path="/.well-known/skills/index.json" url="https://imitate.email/.well-known/skills/index.json" statusCode=404WARNNo Agent Skills discovery index was found at the canonical or legacy path.

Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation

DNS-AID Agent Discovery

DNS-AID Agent Discovery has a validation warning at "Query DNS-AID records".

13 Warning

Needs attention

DNS-AID Agent Discovery

Warning
01

Issue

No DNS-AID HTTPS/SVCB records were found under _agents.

02

Why it matters

DNS-AID lets agents discover index, A2A, and other agent entrypoints before fetching HTTP metadata. HTTPS/SVCB records provide the service-binding substrate, while DNSSEC can authenticate the discovery answer when available.

Check name

DNS-AID Agent Discovery

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

Skill Discovery

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish DNS-AID HTTPS/SVCB records under _agents for DNS-based agent entrypoint discovery.

Result

DNS-AID Agent Discovery has a validation warning at "Query DNS-AID records".

Validation steps

  1. Query DNS-AID records

    No DNS-AID HTTPS/SVCB records were found under _agents.

  2. Check DNSSEC authentication evidence

    DNSSEC authentication evidence was not visible for the DNS-AID labels or hostname.

Evidence log2 steps · 23 lines
Query DNS-AID records [warning]! No DNS-AID HTTPS/SVCB records were found under _agents.INFOQuery DNS-AID recordsINFOBuild DNS-AID query names from hostname hostname="imitate.email" labels=["_index._agents.imitate.email","_a2a._agents.imitate.email"] claimedOnPage=falseWARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_index._agents.imitate.email" rrtype="HTTPS" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" rcode=0 ad=false answerCount=0WARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_index._agents.imitate.email" rrtype="SVCB" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" rcode=0 ad=false answerCount=0WARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_index._agents.imitate.email" rrtype="ANY" resolver="node-resolveAny-fallback" answerCount=0 error="queryAny ETIMEOUT _index._agents.imitate.email"WARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_a2a._agents.imitate.email" rrtype="HTTPS" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" rcode=0 ad=false answerCount=0WARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_a2a._agents.imitate.email" rrtype="SVCB" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" rcode=0 ad=false answerCount=0WARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_a2a._agents.imitate.email" rrtype="ANY" resolver="node-resolveAny-fallback" answerCount=0 error="queryAny ETIMEOUT _a2a._agents.imitate.email"WARNCompare total DNS-AID answer count actual=0 expected="> 0"WARNNo DNS-AID HTTPS/SVCB records were found under _agents.Check DNSSEC authentication evidence [warning]! DNSSEC authentication evidence was not visible for the DNS-AID labels or hostname.INFOCheck DNSSEC authentication evidenceWARNCompare DNSSEC authenticated-data flag actual=false expected=trueWARNCompare visible DNSSEC material actual=false expected=trueWARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_index._agents.imitate.email" rrtype="HTTPS" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_index._agents.imitate.email" rrtype="SVCB" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_index._agents.imitate.email" rrtype="ANY" resolver="node-resolveAny-fallback" dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_a2a._agents.imitate.email" rrtype="HTTPS" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_a2a._agents.imitate.email" rrtype="SVCB" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_a2a._agents.imitate.email" rrtype="ANY" resolver="node-resolveAny-fallback" dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_index._agents.imitate.email" rrtype="DNSKEY" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_a2a._agents.imitate.email" rrtype="DNSKEY" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="imitate.email" rrtype="DNSKEY" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNDNSSEC authentication evidence was not visible for the DNS-AID labels or hostname.

AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished

Semantic HTML

Semantic HTML is partially implemented.

12 Warning

Needs attention

Semantic HTML

Warning
01

Issue

Semantic HTML is incomplete: invalid h1 structure (visible h1 count 5); skipped or empty headings; 7 links missing accessible names; 5 links are not crawlable; 1 controls missing accessible names; 2 form controls missing labels; 0/5 applicable personal-data inputs have valid autocomplete attributes (5 missing); 8 images missing alt attributes.

Details

02

Why it matters

Semantic HTML gives browsers, assistive technology, search systems, and agents reliable landmarks, headings, controls, form semantics, and image context.

Check name

Semantic HTML

Score

26/100

Status

warning

Category

Content Readiness

Maturity

Established

Goal

Expose readable page structure through semantic HTML and accessible controls.

Result

Semantic HTML is partially implemented.

Validation steps

  1. Heading structure

    Expected one meaningful visible h1; found 5.

  2. Links

    7 links are missing accessible names.

  3. Buttons and interactive controls

    1 button controls are missing accessible names.

  4. Form labels and autocomplete

    2 user-fillable form controls are missing labels.

  5. Image text alternatives

    8 images are missing alt attributes.

Evidence log5 steps · 15 lines
Heading structure [fail]! Expected one meaningful visible h1; found 5.INFOHeading structureFAILCheck heading structure evidence actual={"counts":{"h1":5,"visibleH1":5,"headings":15,"emptyHeadings":1},"meaningfulH1":false} expected="semantic HTML evidence for this step"FAILHeading structure failed issue="Expected one meaningful visible h1; found 5."Links [fail]! 7 links are missing accessible names.INFOLinksFAILCheck links evidence actual={"counts":{"links":48,"inaccessibleLinks":7,"nonCrawlableLinks":5,"genericLinks":4},"accessibleLinks":false} expected="semantic HTML evidence for this step"FAILLinks failed issue="7 links are missing accessible names."Buttons and interactive controls [fail]! 1 button controls are missing accessible names.INFOButtons and interactive controlsFAILCheck buttons and interactive controls evidence actual={"counts":{"buttons":4,"inaccessibleButtons":1},"accessibleButtons":false} expected="links, buttons, and form controls expose accessible names"FAILButtons and interactive controls failed issue="1 button controls are missing accessible names."Form labels and autocomplete [fail]! 2 user-fillable form controls are missing labels.INFOForm labels and autocompleteFAILCheck form labels and autocomplete evidence actual={"counts":{"formControls":5,"unlabeledFormControls":2,"autocompleteInputs":5,"inputsWithAutocomplete":0,"missingAutocompleteInputs":5},"formLabelCoverage":false} expected="semantic HTML evidence for this step"FAILForm labels and autocomplete failed issue="2 user-fillable form controls are missing labels."Image text alternatives [fail]! 8 images are missing alt attributes.INFOImage text alternativesFAILCheck image text alternatives evidence actual={"counts":{"images":19,"imagesWithAlt":11,"imageAltIssues":0},"imageAltCoverage":false} expected="semantic HTML evidence for this step"FAILImage text alternatives failed issue="8 images are missing alt attributes."

Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished

Content-Security-Policy

Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate fetch baseline".

10 Fail

Needs attention

Content-Security-Policy

Failed check
01

Issue

CSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback.

02

Why it matters

Content Security Policy reduces the impact of injection bugs by limiting where scripts, styles, frames, forms, and other browser resources can load or execute.

Check name

Content-Security-Policy

Score

50/100

Status

fail

Category

Security & Trust

Maturity

Established

Goal

Constrain browser resource loading and script execution with an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.

Result

Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate fetch baseline".

Validation steps

  1. Evaluate fetch baseline

    CSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback.

  2. Evaluate script execution

    No script-src or default-src directive constrains script execution.

  3. Review hardening directives

    CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri, form-action.

  4. Review CSP reporting

    CSP does not define a reporting endpoint.

Evidence log4 steps · 16 lines
Evaluate fetch baseline [fail]! CSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback.INFOEvaluate fetch baselineINFOEvaluate resource loading fallback explicitFetchDirectives=[]FAILCompare fetch baseline actual="0 explicit fetch directives" expected="restricted default-src or broad explicit fetch coverage" issue="CSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback."FAILCSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback.Evaluate script execution [fail]! No script-src or default-src directive constrains script execution.INFOEvaluate script executionINFOInspect effective script directive FAILCompare script execution posture actual={"hasNonce":false,"hasHash":false,"hasStrictDynamic":false,"hasUnsafeInline":false,"hasUnsafeEval":false,"hasWildcardHost":false,"hasBroadScheme":false,"dangerousSchemes":[]} expected="constrained script sources without unsafe execution allowances" issue="No script-src or default-src directive constrains script execution."FAILNo script-src or default-src directive constrains script execution.Review hardening directives [warning]! CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri, form-action.INFOReview hardening directivesINFOInspect CSP hardening directives frameAncestors=["'none'"] formCount=3WARNCompare recommended hardening coverage actual=["object-src","base-uri","form-action"] expected="no missing object-src/base-uri/form-action requirements" issue="CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri, form-action."WARNCSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri, form-action.Review CSP reporting [warning]! CSP does not define a reporting endpoint.INFOReview CSP reportingINFOInspect CSP reporting directives reportOnlyHeaderPresent=false reportOnlyDirectives=[]WARNCompare violation reporting configuration actual="no reporting endpoint" expected="report-to or report-uri present" issue="CSP does not define a reporting endpoint."WARNCSP does not define a reporting endpoint.

AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlInformational

Content Signal

Content Signal has a validation warning at "Validate declared usage preferences".

10 Warning

Needs attention

Content Signal

Warning
01

Issue

No Content-Usage or Content-Signal declarations were found.

02

Why it matters

Content usage preference signals communicate intended downstream AI use separately from robots.txt crawl permission. They can express training and search preferences for compliant systems without replacing access-control rules.

Check name

Content Signal

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

Bot Access Control

Maturity

Informational

Goal

Declare AI content usage preferences when the site intentionally publishes machine-readable usage policy.

Result

Content Signal has a validation warning at "Validate declared usage preferences".

Validation steps

  1. Validate declared usage preferences

    No Content-Usage or Content-Signal declarations were found.

Evidence log1 step · 5 lines
Validate declared usage preferences [warning]! No Content-Usage or Content-Signal declarations were found.INFOValidate declared usage preferencesINFOParsing declared preferences into terms and values recordCount=0SKIPSkipping declaration validation because no Content-Usage or Content-Signal records were declared.SKIPCompare declared records to validation requirement actual=0 expected="No validation needed when no records are declared"WARNNo Content-Usage or Content-Signal declarations were present.

AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEmerging recommendation

RSL license signal

No RSL declarations were found.

10 Warning

Needs attention

RSL license signal

Warning
01

Issue

No RSL declarations were found.

02

Why it matters

Really Simple Licensing is an emerging rights-expression layer for communicating content usage and licensing terms separately from robots.txt crawl permission.

Check name

RSL license signal

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

Bot Access Control

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Declare machine-readable content licensing terms for compliant AI and crawler systems when the site needs them.

Result

No RSL declarations were found.

Validation steps

  1. Discover RSL declarations

    No RSL declarations were found.

Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Discover RSL declarations [warning]! No RSL declarations were found.INFODiscover RSL declarationsINFOChecking robots.txt License records, HTTP Link rel=license headers, HTML license links, and inline RSL XML robotsFound=trueSKIPCount discovered RSL declarations actual=0 expected=">= 1 when RSL licensing terms are published" sources={}WARNNo RSL declarations were found on any supported discovery surface.

AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEmerging recommendation

TDMRep declaration

No TDMRep declaration was found.

10 Warning

Needs attention

TDMRep declaration

Warning
01

Issue

No TDMRep declaration was found at /.well-known/tdmrep.json.

02

Why it matters

TDMRep is a W3C Community Group protocol and IANA-registered well-known URI for declaring text and data mining reservation policy on applicable content.

Check name

TDMRep declaration

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

Bot Access Control

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish a machine-readable text and data mining reservation declaration and verifiable ODRL policy when the site needs one.

Result

No TDMRep declaration was found.

Validation steps

  1. Fetch /.well-known/tdmrep.json

    No TDMRep declaration was found at /.well-known/tdmrep.json.

Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Fetch /.well-known/tdmrep.json [warning]! No TDMRep declaration was found at /.well-known/tdmrep.json.INFOFetch /.well-known/tdmrep.jsonINFORequesting origin-level TDMRep declaration at /.well-known/tdmrep.jsonWARNCompare TDMRep file response actual=404 expected="2xx with JSON array when origin-level TDMRep is published" contentType=null length=0WARNNo TDMRep declaration was found at /.well-known/tdmrep.json. 

AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEmerging recommendation

llms.txt

llms.txt failed at "Validate Markdown discovery shape".

9 Fail

Needs attention

llms.txt

Failed check
01

Issue

llms.txt did not provide the minimum expected Markdown discovery shape.

Details

02

Why it matters

llms.txt is an emerging Markdown convention for giving language-model clients curated context and links before they crawl broadly. Broken, private, or low-signal links make the file much less useful even when it exists.

Check name

llms.txt

Score

47/100

Status

fail

Category

Content Readiness

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish a concise llms.txt index that helps agents discover useful public site context.

Result

llms.txt failed at "Validate Markdown discovery shape".

Validation steps

  1. Validate Markdown discovery shape

    llms.txt did not provide the minimum expected Markdown discovery shape.

    Findings
    • Content-Type "text/html; charset=utf-8" is not text/markdown, another Markdown type, or text/plain.
    • Response looks like an HTML page rather than a Markdown/text llms.txt file.
    • Missing H1 title, such as '# Example Docs'.
  2. Score llms.txt structure and usefulness

    llms.txt includes unsafe or private links that should not be advertised to agents.

    Findings
    • Missing a blockquote summary. The llms.txt proposal recommends a concise blockquote after the H1.
    • Missing H2 sections for grouping important links.
    • No Markdown-formatted links were found.
    • Several links have vague labels or raw URL labels.
    • {
        "truncated": true,
        "omittedCount": 2,
        "originalCount": 6
      }
  3. Inspect optional llms-full.txt

    Passed.

Evidence log3 steps · 21 lines
Validate Markdown discovery shape [fail]! llms.txt did not provide the minimum expected Markdown discovery shape.INFOValidate Markdown discovery shapeINFOChecking response compatibility, title, content length, and usable linksFAILCheck content type is Markdown-compatible text actual="text/html; charset=utf-8" expected="text/markdown, text/x-markdown, text/plain, or another Markdown text type"FAILCheck response is not HTML actual=true expected=falseFAILCheck H1 title is present actual=false expected=truePASSCheck minimum text length actual=47258 expected=">= 160"PASSCheck at least one usable public link actual=31 expected="> 0" linkCount=32FAILMarkdown discovery shape validation failedScore llms.txt structure and usefulness [fail]! llms.txt includes unsafe or private links that should not be advertised to agents.INFOScore llms.txt structure and usefulnessINFOChecking recommended summary, sections, link labels, agent-friendly links, duplicates, and unsafe targetsWARNCheck blockquote summary is present actual=false expected=trueWARNCheck H2 section count actual=0 expected="> 0"WARNCheck Markdown-formatted links actual=0 expected="> 0"FAILCheck unsafe/private link count actual=1 expected=0FAILllms.txt structure-quality validation failed reason="llms.txt includes unsafe or private links that should not be advertised to agents."Inspect optional llms-full.txt [informational]INFOInspect optional llms-full.txtINFOTrying to fetch /llms-full.txt url="https://imitate.email/llms-full.txt"PASS/llms-full.txt returned HTTP 2xx statusCode=200 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8" length=65473WARNCheck llms-full.txt content type is Markdown-compatible text actual="text/html; charset=utf-8" expected="text/markdown, text/x-markdown, text/plain, or another Markdown text type"PASSCheck llms-full.txt looks like supplemental full corpus content actual=true expected=truePASSOptional llms-full.txt inspection recorded

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

GEO: Citable passages

GEO: Citable passages scored 0/100 and needs a fix.

9 Fail

Needs attention

GEO: Citable passages

Failed check
01

Issue

No evidence-backed, citation-length explanatory paragraph was found.

Details

02

Why it matters

Generative answer systems work best with visible, self-contained, evidence-backed content, clear entities, trustworthy attribution, structured page sections, and crawler-accessible HTML. These signals improve machine understanding even though they do not guarantee AI citations.

Check name

GEO: Citable passages

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for AI answer engines to extract, cite, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

GEO: Citable passages scored 0/100 and needs a fix.

Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished

X-Content-Type-Options

X-Content-Type-Options failed at "Find X-Content-Type-Options".

9 Fail

Needs attention

X-Content-Type-Options

Failed check
01

Issue

Browser-loadable response is missing X-Content-Type-Options.

02

Why it matters

X-Content-Type-Options tells browsers to trust declared media types instead of sniffing content, reducing the risk that mislabeled files execute as active content.

Check name

X-Content-Type-Options

Score

57/100

Status

fail

Category

Security & Trust

Maturity

Established

Goal

Prevent browser MIME sniffing for browser-loadable responses with X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

Result

X-Content-Type-Options failed at "Find X-Content-Type-Options".

Validation steps

  1. Find X-Content-Type-Options

    Browser-loadable response is missing X-Content-Type-Options.

  2. Review observed browser responses

    One or more same-origin active resources observed by Chrome did not emit X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

Evidence log2 steps · 8 lines
Find X-Content-Type-Options [fail]! Browser-loadable response is missing X-Content-Type-Options.INFOFind X-Content-Type-OptionsINFORead X-Content-Type-Options header header="x-content-type-options" value="missing"FAILRequire nosniff header actual="missing" expected="present" issue="Browser-loadable response is missing X-Content-Type-Options."FAILBrowser-loadable response is missing X-Content-Type-Options.Review observed browser responses [warning]! One or more same-origin active resources observed by Chrome did not emit X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.INFOReview observed browser responsesINFOSample Chrome-observed same-origin resources observedResponseCount=61 sameOriginCount=34 eligibleCount=33WARNCompare observed nosniff coverage actual={"missingNosniffCount":33,"malformedNosniffCount":0,"activeResourceMissingNosniffCount":8,"affected":[{"url":"https://imitate.email/","status":200,"resourceType":"document","contentType":"text/html; charset=utf-8"},{"url":"https://imitate.email/css/styles.min.css?v=Do_Gm__MIxKF0kYp420IWqXcj_XYBqsZmfvL3gz4RlM","status":200,"resourceType":"stylesheet","contentType":"text/css"},{"url":"https://imitate.email/images/logo.png","status":200,"resourceType":"image","contentType":"image/png"},{"url":"https://imitate.email/images/logo-icon.png","status":200,"resourceType":"image","contentType":"image/png"},{"url":"https://imitate.email/js/main.min.js?v=4PNuavzW14UCIa6MXShTDOq-H8CJrsSBYg9OddehfZ0","status":200,"resourceType":"script","contentType":"text/javascript"},{"url":"https://imitate.email/images/oidc/microsoft-logo.png","status":200,"resourceType":"image","contentType":"image/png"},{"url":"https://imitate.email/images/oidc/github-mark-white.png","status":200,"resourceType":"image","contentType":"image/png"},{"url":"https://imitate.email/images/oidc/g-logo.png","status":200,"resourceType":"image","contentType":"image/png"},{"url":"https://imitate.email/images/oidc/2021%20Twitter%20logo%20-%20white.png","status":200,"resourceType":"image","contentType":"image/png"},{"url":"https://imitate.email/images/homepage.webp","status":200,"resourceType":"image","contentType":"image/webp"},{"url":"https://imitate.email/images/widget.png","status":200,"resourceType":"image","contentType":"image/png"},{"url":"https://imitate.email/images/pexels-fauxels-3184435.jpg","status":200,"resourceType":"image","contentType":"image/jpeg"}]} expected="0 missing or malformed eligible same-origin responses" issue="One or more same-origin active resources observed by Chrome did not emit X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff."WARNOne or more same-origin active resources observed by Chrome did not emit X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished

Author attribution

Author attribution is partially implemented.

8 Warning

Needs attention

Author attribution

Warning
01

Issue

No named author or publisher identity could be extracted.

02

Why it matters

Author attribution helps agents cite content responsibly, assess source credibility, and distinguish editorial pages from anonymous marketing copy.

Check name

Author attribution

Score

55/100

Status

warning

Category

Content Readiness

Maturity

Established

Goal

Identify content authors or publishers for trust and attribution.

Result

Author attribution is partially implemented.

Validation steps

  1. Schema.org attribution

    Schema.org attribution is incomplete or relies only on publisher/fallback evidence.

  2. Author identity quality

    No named author or publisher identity could be extracted.

Evidence log2 steps · 8 lines
Schema.org attribution [warning]! Schema.org attribution is incomplete or relies only on publisher/fallback evidence.INFOSchema.org attributionINFOChecking structured data for author, creator, and publisher contributorsWARNCheck named Schema.org author count actual=0 expected="> 0" authorCount=0 publisherCount=0 namedContributors=0 authors=[] publishers=[] formats=[]WARNSchema.org attribution is incomplete or fallback-only authorCount=0 publisherCount=0 authors=[] publishers=[]Author identity quality [fail]! No named author or publisher identity could be extracted.INFOAuthor identity qualityINFOChecking contributors for stable identity signalsFAILCheck identified contributor count actual=0 expected="> 0" namedContributors=0 identifiedContributors=[] unidentifiedContributors=[]FAILNo named contributor identity could be extracted

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Evidence and trust

AEO: Evidence and trust scored 43/100 and needs a fix.

5 Fail

Needs attention

AEO: Evidence and trust

Failed check
01

Issue

Missing answer evidence or trust signals: author, publisher, freshnessDate, sameAs.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Evidence and trust

Score

43/100

Status

fail

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Evidence and trust scored 43/100 and needs a fix.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

GEO: Source and trust signals

GEO: Source and trust signals scored 50/100 and needs improvement.

4 Warning

Needs attention

GEO: Source and trust signals

Warning
01

Issue

Missing source or trust signals: authorOrOwner, freshnessDate, entityLinks.

Details

02

Why it matters

Generative answer systems work best with visible, self-contained, evidence-backed content, clear entities, trustworthy attribution, structured page sections, and crawler-accessible HTML. These signals improve machine understanding even though they do not guarantee AI citations.

Check name

GEO: Source and trust signals

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for AI answer engines to extract, cite, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

GEO: Source and trust signals scored 50/100 and needs improvement.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

GEO: Structured extraction

GEO: Structured extraction scored 50/100 and needs improvement.

4 Warning

Needs attention

GEO: Structured extraction

Warning
01

Issue

Missing or weak extraction signals: clean heading hierarchy, summary or key takeaways, FAQ or question-answer section where appropriate, typed JSON-LD structured data.

Details

02

Why it matters

Generative answer systems work best with visible, self-contained, evidence-backed content, clear entities, trustworthy attribution, structured page sections, and crawler-accessible HTML. These signals improve machine understanding even though they do not guarantee AI citations.

Check name

GEO: Structured extraction

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for AI answer engines to extract, cite, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

GEO: Structured extraction scored 50/100 and needs improvement.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Answer-first passages

AEO: Answer-first passages scored 60/100 and needs improvement.

4 Warning

Needs attention

AEO: Answer-first passages

Warning
01

Issue

4 section(s) bury or omit a concise opening answer.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Answer-first passages

Score

60/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Answer-first passages scored 60/100 and needs improvement.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AIO: Source and trust signals

AIO: Source and trust signals scored 50/100 and needs improvement.

3 Warning

Needs attention

AIO: Source and trust signals

Warning
01

Issue

Missing AIO trust signals: author, publisher, freshnessDate.

Details

02

Why it matters

Google AI Overviews and AI Mode depend on normal Google Search eligibility, snippet permissions, useful visible content, consistent structured data, trust signals, and page experience basics. These signals help Google understand and preview a page, but they do not guarantee selection.

Check name

AIO: Source and trust signals

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content eligible, understandable, and previewable for Google Search AI features without promising inclusion.

Result

AIO: Source and trust signals scored 50/100 and needs improvement.

Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished

Frame protection

Frame protection has a validation warning at "Review CSP and XFO interaction".

2 Warning

Needs attention

Frame protection

Warning
01

Issue

CSP frame-ancestors and X-Frame-Options express different framing policies.

02

Why it matters

Frame protection blocks hostile sites from embedding pages in deceptive frames, reducing clickjacking and UI redressing risk.

Check name

Frame protection

Score

88/100

Status

warning

Category

Security & Trust

Maturity

Established

Goal

Prevent unwanted framing with an enforcing CSP frame-ancestors directive or a valid X-Frame-Options fallback.

Result

Frame protection has a validation warning at "Review CSP and XFO interaction".

Validation steps

  1. Review CSP and XFO interaction

    CSP frame-ancestors and X-Frame-Options express different framing policies.

  2. Review observed browser responses

    One or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit valid frame protection.

Evidence log2 steps · 8 lines
Review CSP and XFO interaction [warning]! CSP frame-ancestors and X-Frame-Options express different framing policies.INFOReview CSP and XFO interactionINFOCompare modern CSP and legacy XFO behavior modernBrowserMechanism="csp-frame-ancestors" cspOverridesXfo=true cspMode="none" xfoDirective="sameorigin"WARNCheck CSP/XFO policy alignment actual="conflict detected" expected="no conflicting framing policy" issue="CSP frame-ancestors and X-Frame-Options express different framing policies."WARNCSP frame-ancestors and X-Frame-Options express different framing policies.Review observed browser responses [warning]! One or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit valid frame protection.INFOReview observed browser responsesINFOSample Chrome-observed same-origin responses observedResponseCount=61 sameOriginCount=34 htmlDocumentCount=4WARNCompare observed HTML frame protection actual={"missingOrInvalidFrameProtectionCount":1,"broadFrameAncestorsCount":0,"affected":[{"url":"https://imitate.email/imitate/Widget?projectName=Imitate&mailboxId=Demo","status":200,"resourceType":"document","contentType":"text/html; charset=utf-8","contentSecurityPolicy":null,"contentSecurityPolicyReportOnly":null}]} expected="0 missing/invalid or broad same-origin HTML responses" issue="One or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit valid frame protection."WARNOne or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit valid frame protection.

Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished

HSTS header

HSTS header has a validation warning at "Validate max-age".

2 Warning

Needs attention

HSTS header

Warning
01

Issue

max-age is below 15552000 seconds.

02

Why it matters

HSTS tells browsers to keep using HTTPS after the first secure visit, reducing downgrade, SSL-stripping, and mixed-transport risk for repeat users.

Check name

HSTS header

Score

88/100

Status

warning

Category

Security & Trust

Maturity

Established

Goal

Require HTTPS for repeat browser visits with a valid Strict-Transport-Security policy.

Result

HSTS header has a validation warning at "Validate max-age".

Validation steps

  1. Validate max-age

    max-age is below 15552000 seconds.

Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Validate max-age [warning]! max-age is below 15552000 seconds.INFOValidate max-ageINFOInspect max-age directive maxAge=2592000 deploymentMinimumSeconds=15552000 preloadStrengthSeconds=31536000WARNCompare HSTS max-age actual=2592000 expected=">= 15552000 seconds" meetsMinimum=false meetsOneYear=false issue="max-age is below 15552000 seconds."WARNmax-age is below 15552000 seconds.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Question and answer structure

AEO: Question and answer structure scored 73/100 and needs improvement.

2 Warning

Needs attention

AEO: Question and answer structure

Warning
01

Issue

Heading structure issues were detected.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Question and answer structure

Score

73/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Question and answer structure scored 73/100 and needs improvement.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Entity and definition clarity

AEO: Entity and definition clarity scored 76/100 and needs improvement.

2 Warning

Needs attention

AEO: Entity and definition clarity

Warning
01

Issue

Expected exactly one h1, found 5.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Entity and definition clarity

Score

76/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Entity and definition clarity scored 76/100 and needs improvement.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

GEO: Entity clarity

GEO: Entity clarity scored 79/100 and needs improvement.

2 Warning

Needs attention

GEO: Entity clarity

Warning
01

Issue

Expected exactly one h1, found 5. Title/H1 terms missing from description: imitate, email, safe, easy, testing, developers, users, sandbox.

Details

02

Why it matters

Generative answer systems work best with visible, self-contained, evidence-backed content, clear entities, trustworthy attribution, structured page sections, and crawler-accessible HTML. These signals improve machine understanding even though they do not guarantee AI citations.

Check name

GEO: Entity clarity

Score

79/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for AI answer engines to extract, cite, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

GEO: Entity clarity scored 79/100 and needs improvement.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AIO: Structured data consistency

AIO: Structured data consistency scored 75/100 and needs improvement.

2 Warning

Needs attention

AIO: Structured data consistency

Warning
01

Issue

No JSON-LD structured data was detected for a page type that likely has a useful Google Search schema fit.

Details

02

Why it matters

Google AI Overviews and AI Mode depend on normal Google Search eligibility, snippet permissions, useful visible content, consistent structured data, trust signals, and page experience basics. These signals help Google understand and preview a page, but they do not guarantee selection.

Check name

AIO: Structured data consistency

Score

75/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content eligible, understandable, and previewable for Google Search AI features without promising inclusion.

Result

AIO: Structured data consistency scored 75/100 and needs improvement.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AIO: Visible content clarity

AIO: Visible content clarity scored 76/100 and needs improvement.

1 Warning

Needs attention

AIO: Visible content clarity

Warning
01

Issue

Expected exactly one h1, found 5. 4 section(s) may benefit from clearer answer-first openings. Heading outline issues were detected.

Details

02

Why it matters

Google AI Overviews and AI Mode depend on normal Google Search eligibility, snippet permissions, useful visible content, consistent structured data, trust signals, and page experience basics. These signals help Google understand and preview a page, but they do not guarantee selection.

Check name

AIO: Visible content clarity

Score

76/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content eligible, understandable, and previewable for Google Search AI features without promising inclusion.

Result

AIO: Visible content clarity scored 76/100 and needs improvement.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AIO: Page experience proxy

AIO: Page experience proxy scored 80/100 and needs improvement.

1 Warning

Needs attention

AIO: Page experience proxy

Warning
01

Issue

19 image(s) are missing width/height attributes.

Details

02

Why it matters

Google AI Overviews and AI Mode depend on normal Google Search eligibility, snippet permissions, useful visible content, consistent structured data, trust signals, and page experience basics. These signals help Google understand and preview a page, but they do not guarantee selection.

Check name

AIO: Page experience proxy

Score

80/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content eligible, understandable, and previewable for Google Search AI features without promising inclusion.

Result

AIO: Page experience proxy scored 80/100 and needs improvement.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AIO: Google Search eligibility

AIO: Google Search eligibility scored 85/100 and needs improvement.

1 Warning

Needs attention

AIO: Google Search eligibility

Warning
01

Issue

Canonical tag is missing.

Details

02

Why it matters

Google AI Overviews and AI Mode depend on normal Google Search eligibility, snippet permissions, useful visible content, consistent structured data, trust signals, and page experience basics. These signals help Google understand and preview a page, but they do not guarantee selection.

Check name

AIO: Google Search eligibility

Score

85/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content eligible, understandable, and previewable for Google Search AI features without promising inclusion.

Result

AIO: Google Search eligibility scored 85/100 and needs improvement.

AI DiscoverabilityDiscoverabilityEstablished

IndexNow key

IndexNow key is informational for this page.

Informational

Needs attention

IndexNow key

Informational
01

Issue

IndexNow key is informational for this page.

02

Why it matters

IndexNow lets sites notify participating search engines about changed URLs, but ownership verification requires a UTF-8 key file whose filename matches the key.

Check name

IndexNow key

Score

100/100

Status

informational

Category

Discoverability

Maturity

Established

Goal

Verify that IndexNow ownership key placement is detectable when the site advertises it.

Result

IndexNow key is informational for this page.

Validation steps

  1. Find advertised IndexNow key location

    No IndexNow key location was advertised in HTML, Link headers, or robots.txt.

  2. Fetch and validate IndexNow key file

    No discoverable IndexNow key file was found.

Evidence log2 steps · 10 lines
Find advertised IndexNow key location [informational]! No IndexNow key location was advertised in HTML, Link headers, or robots.txt.INFOFind advertised IndexNow key locationINFOLook for IndexNow key hints in HTML, Link headers, and robots.txt supportedHints=["robots.txt IndexNow-Key","rel=indexnow-key","meta name=indexnow-key-location"]PASSCompare advertised key location count actual=0 expected="> 0"WARNNo IndexNow key location was advertised in HTML, Link headers, or robots.txt.Fetch and validate IndexNow key file [informational]! No discoverable IndexNow key file was found.INFOFetch and validate IndexNow key fileINFOLook for IndexNow key hints in HTML, Link headers, and robots.txt supportedHints=["robots.txt IndexNow-Key","rel=indexnow-key","meta name=indexnow-key-location"]PASSCompare advertised key location count actual=0 expected="> 0"INFOFetch each advertised same-origin key file and validate filename/body matchFAILCompare valid IndexNow key file count actual=0 expected="> 0"WARNNo discoverable IndexNow key file was found.

Performance and AccessibilityBest PracticesBrowser audit

Browser errors were logged to the console

50 Fail

Check name

Browser errors were logged to the console

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Device

desktop

Category

Best Practices

Fix guidance

Errors logged to the console indicate unresolved problems. They can come from network request failures and other browser concerns. [Learn more about this errors in console diagnostic audit](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/best-practices/errors-in-console/)

Evidence
{
  "description": "Errors logged to the console indicate unresolved problems. They can come from network request failures and other browser concerns. [Learn more about this errors in console diagnostic audit](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/best-practices/errors-in-console/)"
}

Performance and AccessibilityBest PracticesBrowser audit

Issues were logged in the `Issues` panel in Chrome Devtools

50 Fail

Check name

Issues were logged in the `Issues` panel in Chrome Devtools

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Device

desktop

Category

Best Practices

Fix guidance

Issues logged to the `Issues` panel in Chrome Devtools indicate unresolved problems. They can come from network request failures, insufficient security controls, and other browser concerns. Open up the Issues panel in Chrome DevTools for more details on each issue.

Evidence
{
  "description": "Issues logged to the `Issues` panel in Chrome Devtools indicate unresolved problems. They can come from network request failures, insufficient security controls, and other browser concerns. Open up the Issues panel in Chrome DevTools for more details on each issue."
}

SEOSEOBrowser audit

Image elements do not have `[alt]` attributes

33 Fail

Check name

Image elements do not have `[alt]` attributes

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Device

desktop

Category

SEO

Fix guidance

Informative elements should aim for short, descriptive alternate text. Decorative elements can be ignored with an empty alt attribute. [Learn more about the `alt` attribute](https://dequeuniversity.com/rules/axe/4.11/image-alt).

Evidence
{
  "description": "Informative elements should aim for short, descriptive alternate text. Decorative elements can be ignored with an empty alt attribute. [Learn more about the `alt` attribute](https://dequeuniversity.com/rules/axe/4.11/image-alt)."
}

SEOSEOBrowser audit

Links are not crawlable

33 Fail

Check name

Links are not crawlable

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Device

desktop

Category

SEO

Fix guidance

Search engines may use `href` attributes on links to crawl websites. Ensure that the `href` attribute of anchor elements links to an appropriate destination, so more pages of the site can be discovered. [Learn how to make links crawlable](https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/9112205)

Evidence
{
  "description": "Search engines may use `href` attributes on links to crawl websites. Ensure that the `href` attribute of anchor elements links to an appropriate destination, so more pages of the site can be discovered. [Learn how to make links crawlable](https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/9112205)"
}

SEOSEOBrowser audit

Links do not have descriptive text

33 Fail

Check name

Links do not have descriptive text

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Device

desktop

Category

SEO

Estimated savings

4 links found

Fix guidance

Descriptive link text helps search engines understand your content. [Learn how to make links more accessible](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/seo/link-text/).

Evidence
{
  "description": "Descriptive link text helps search engines understand your content. [Learn how to make links more accessible](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/seo/link-text/).",
  "displayValue": "4 links found"
}

Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit

Font display

14 Fail

Check name

Font display

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Device

desktop

Category

Performance

Estimated savings

Est savings of 1,860 ms

Fix guidance

Consider setting [font-display](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/font-display) to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with [font metric overrides](https://developer.chrome.com/blog/font-fallbacks).

Evidence
{
  "description": "Consider setting [font-display](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/font-display) to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with [font metric overrides](https://developer.chrome.com/blog/font-fallbacks).",
  "displayValue": "Est savings of 1,860 ms"
}

Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit

Forced reflow

14 Fail

Check name

Forced reflow

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Device

desktop

Category

Performance

Fix guidance

A forced reflow occurs when JavaScript queries geometric properties (such as offsetWidth) after styles have been invalidated by a change to the DOM state. This can result in poor performance. Learn more about [forced reflows](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/forced-reflow) and possible mitigations.

Evidence
{
  "description": "A forced reflow occurs when JavaScript queries geometric properties (such as offsetWidth) after styles have been invalidated by a change to the DOM state. This can result in poor performance. Learn more about [forced reflows](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/forced-reflow) and possible mitigations."
}

Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit

Network dependency tree

14 Fail

Check name

Network dependency tree

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Device

desktop

Category

Performance

Fix guidance

[Avoid chaining critical requests](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/network-dependency-tree) by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load.

Evidence
{
  "description": "[Avoid chaining critical requests](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/network-dependency-tree) by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load."
}

Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit

Reduce unused JavaScript

14 Fail

Check name

Reduce unused JavaScript

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Device

desktop

Category

Performance

Estimated savings

Est savings of 779 KiB

Fix guidance

Reduce unused JavaScript and defer loading scripts until they are required to decrease bytes consumed by network activity. [Learn how to reduce unused JavaScript](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/unused-javascript/).

Evidence
{
  "description": "Reduce unused JavaScript and defer loading scripts until they are required to decrease bytes consumed by network activity. [Learn how to reduce unused JavaScript](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/unused-javascript/).",
  "displayValue": "Est savings of 779 KiB",
  "numericValue": 440
}

Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit

Image elements do not have explicit `width` and `height`

7 Warning

Check name

Image elements do not have explicit `width` and `height`

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Device

desktop

Category

Performance

Fix guidance

Set an explicit width and height on image elements to reduce layout shifts and improve CLS. [Learn how to set image dimensions](https://web.dev/articles/optimize-cls#images_without_dimensions)

Evidence
{
  "description": "Set an explicit width and height on image elements to reduce layout shifts and improve CLS. [Learn how to set image dimensions](https://web.dev/articles/optimize-cls#images_without_dimensions)"
}

Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit

Use efficient cache lifetimes

7 Warning

Check name

Use efficient cache lifetimes

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Device

desktop

Category

Performance

Estimated savings

Est savings of 241 KiB

Fix guidance

A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page. [Learn more about caching](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/cache).

Evidence
{
  "description": "A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page. [Learn more about caching](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/cache).",
  "displayValue": "Est savings of 241 KiB"
}

Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit

Loading performance

6 Fail

Check name

Loading performance

Score

60/100

Status

fail

Device

desktop

Category

Performance

Fix guidance

Review the grouped loading performance checks and improve the failing sub-checks listed in evidence.

Evidence
{
  "checks": [
    {
      "id": "interactive",
      "score": 59,
      "title": "Time to Interactive",
      "displayValue": "4.0 s",
      "numericValue": 4009.592899027894
    },
    {
      "id": "network-rtt",
      "score": 100,
      "title": "Network Round Trip Times",
      "displayValue": "30 ms",
      "numericValue": 26.706735
    },
    {
      "id": "max-potential-fid",
      "score": 33,
      "title": "Max Potential First Input Delay",
      "displayValue": "310 ms",
      "numericValue": 310
    },
    {
      "id": "total-blocking-time",
      "score": 36,
      "title": "Total Blocking Time",
      "displayValue": "440 ms",
      "numericValue": 436.49336367089495
    },
    {
      "id": "speed-index",
      "score": 16,
      "title": "Speed Index",
      "displayValue": "3.5 s",
      "numericValue": 3533.2410664168865
    },
    {
      "id": "largest-contentful-paint",
      "score": 50,
      "title": "Largest Contentful Paint",
      "displayValue": "2.4 s",
      "numericValue": 2379.034966866354
    },
    {
      "id": "first-contentful-paint",
      "score": 84,
      "title": "First Contentful Paint",
      "displayValue": "1.0 s",
      "numericValue": 1040.0074979274755
    },
    {
      "id": "server-response-time",
      "score": 100,
      "title": "Initial server response time was short",
      "displayValue": "Root document took 550 ms",
      "numericValue": 553
    }
  ]
}

Fix with MCP or CLI

Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.

Score history

Public scan score over time

Public reports for this website origin. Select any point or report link to open that canonical report.

1 reports
Public score history report links
Scan dateScoreReadinessReport
52/100Level 3, Bot-AwareCurrent report