Rescan Report
Share Report
Copy Report Link
Rescan Report
Share Report
Copy Report Link
Export Report
40/100

OVERALL SCORE

Level 2, Agent-Limited

Priority improvements needed for AI agents
AIDiscoverability45%Agent Easeof Use42%Security& Trust70%GEO, AIO, AEO52%SEO83%Performance51%Accessibility0%
  • AI Discoverability 45 out of 100
  • Agent Ease of Use 42 out of 100
  • Security & Trust 70 out of 100
  • GEO, AIO and AEO 52 out of 100
  • SEO 83 out of 100
  • Performance 51 out of 100
  • Accessibility 0 out of 100

CAPTURED SCREENSHOT

Captured website desktop screenshot

What AI sees of your website

IUCN Red List of Threatened Species favicon

IUCN Red List of Threatened Species

Established in 1964, the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species has evolved to become the world’s most comprehensive information source on the global conservation status of animal, fungi and plant species.

Detailed report scores grouped by capability area
MetricScoreStatusPassedFailedWarningEvidence
AI Discoverability
45
Priority fix1411View details
Discoverability
40
Priority fix400
Content Readiness
19
Priority fix611View details
Bot Access Control
69
Needs work400
Agent Ease of Use
42
Priority fix010View details
Google Agentic Browsing
7
Priority fix010View details
GEO, AIO and AEO
52
Needs work400
GEO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable100
AIO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable100
AEO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable200
SEO
83
Mostly ready700
SEO
83
Mostly ready700
Security & Trust
70
Needs work1600
Security & Trust
70
Needs work1600
Performance
51
Needs work1010View details
Performance
51
Needs work1010View details

Prioritized recommendations

Issues ranked by score impact

3 items need attention

AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished

Author attribution

Author attribution is partially implemented.

45 Warning

Needs attention

Author attribution

Warning
01

Issue

No named author or publisher identity could be extracted.

02

Why it matters

Author attribution helps agents cite content responsibly, assess source credibility, and distinguish editorial pages from anonymous marketing copy.

Check name

Author attribution

Score

55/100

Status

warning

Category

Content Readiness

Maturity

Established

Goal

Identify content authors or publishers for trust and attribution.

Result

Author attribution is partially implemented.

Validation steps

  1. Schema.org attribution

    Schema.org attribution is incomplete or relies only on publisher/fallback evidence.

  2. Author identity quality

    No named author or publisher identity could be extracted.

Evidence log2 steps · 8 lines
Schema.org attribution [warning]! Schema.org attribution is incomplete or relies only on publisher/fallback evidence.INFOSchema.org attributionINFOChecking structured data for author, creator, and publisher contributorsWARNCheck named Schema.org author count actual=0 expected="> 0" authorCount=0 publisherCount=0 namedContributors=0 authors=[] publishers=[] formats=[]WARNSchema.org attribution is incomplete or fallback-only authorCount=0 publisherCount=0 authors=[] publishers=[]Author identity quality [fail]! No named author or publisher identity could be extracted.INFOAuthor identity qualityINFOChecking contributors for stable identity signalsFAILCheck identified contributor count actual=0 expected="> 0" namedContributors=0 identifiedContributors=[] unidentifiedContributors=[]FAILNo named contributor identity could be extracted

Agent Ease of UseGoogle Agentic BrowsingBrowser audit

Accessibility tree is not well-formed

100 Fail

Check name

Accessibility tree is not well-formed

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Device

desktop

Category

Google Agentic Browsing

Fix guidance

A well-formed [accessibility tree](http://goo.gle/lighthouse-agentic-a11y) helps AI agents to navigate and interact with the page.

Evidence
{
  "description": "A well-formed [accessibility tree](http://goo.gle/lighthouse-agentic-a11y) helps AI agents to navigate and interact with the page."
}

PerformancePerformanceBrowser audit

Avoid large layout shifts

100 Fail

Check name

Avoid large layout shifts

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Device

desktop

Category

Performance

Estimated savings

6 layout shifts found

Fix guidance

These are the largest layout shifts observed on the page. Each table item represents a single layout shift, and shows the element that shifted the most. Below each item are possible root causes that led to the layout shift. Some of these layout shifts may not be included in the CLS metric value due to [windowing](https://web.dev/articles/cls#what_is_cls). [Learn how to improve CLS](https://web.dev/articles/optimize-cls)

Evidence
{
  "displayValue": "6 layout shifts found",
  "description": "These are the largest layout shifts observed on the page. Each table item represents a single layout shift, and shows the element that shifted the most. Below each item are possible root causes that led to the layout shift. Some of these layout shifts may not be included in the CLS metric value due to [windowing](https://web.dev/articles/cls#what_is_cls). [Learn how to improve CLS](https://web.dev/articles/optimize-cls)"
}

Sign in to see 47 other issues and the full report

Create a free account to unlock every issue, evidence details, exports, and higher free limits.

Email code

Fix with MCP or CLI

Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.

Score history

Public scan score over time

Public reports for this website origin. Select any point or report link to open that canonical report.

1 reports
Public score history report links
Scan dateScoreReadinessReport
40/100Level 2, Agent-LimitedCurrent report