CanAgentUse

CanAgentUse products

Agentic Browsing AuditCheck dialogs, menus, drawers, popovers, form errors, checkout steps, and other UI states that a standard Lighthouse scan may not capture.View product MCP ServerInstall CanAgentUse in your coding agent so scan findings become repo-ready fixes.View product WooCommerce PluginPublish UCP discovery and agent-ready commerce signals from WooCommerce without rebuilding checkout.View product Shopify PluginAdd UCP discovery, storefront metadata checks, and controlled cart-to-checkout flows for shopping agents.View product AgentReady CIScan commits and PRs, publish reports, and choose which agent-readiness failures should block merges.View product

CanAgentUse tools

UCP Suite

Validate Universal Commerce Protocol discovery, then test product search, carts, checkout links, and merchant handoff flows.

UCP ValidatorUCP Playground

MCP Playground

Connect to remote MCP servers, inspect tools and resources, test prompts, auth, headers, notifications, and JSON-RPC responses.

MCP Playground

A2A Playground

Inspect Agent Cards, validate advertised endpoints, and prepare safe requests for agent-to-agent workflows.

A2A Playground

Agent Website Viewer

Enter a public URL and see the roles, names, landmarks, controls, and blockers that shape how AI agents understand the page.

Agent Website Viewer
New Scan
https://www.luxaire.com/
SCANNED
Jul 18, 2026, 11:59 AM
VISIBILITY
Public
SUITE2026.06.10
Rescan Report
Share Report
Copy Report Link
Export Report
51/100

OVERALL SCORE

Level 3, Bot-Aware

Moderate readiness for AI agents
AIDiscoverability64%Agent Easeof Use56%Security& Trust73%GEO, AIO, AEO57%SEO100%Performance54%Accessibility0%
  • AI Discoverability 64 out of 100
  • Agent Ease of Use 56 out of 100
  • Security & Trust 73 out of 100
  • GEO, AIO and AEO 57 out of 100
  • SEO 100 out of 100
  • Performance 54 out of 100
  • Accessibility 0 out of 100

CAPTURED SCREENSHOT

Captured website desktop screenshot

What AI sees of your website

Luxaire® | Residential And Commercial | Heating And Cooling favicon

Luxaire® | Residential And Commercial | Heating And Cooling

Learn more about Luxaire® residential and commercial heating and cooling systems.

Open Agent View

Next step

Turn this report into a fix workflow

1 failed check is ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.

Fix with MCP / CLI
Detailed report scores grouped by capability area
MetricScoreStatusPassedFailedWarningEvidence
AI Discoverability
64
Needs work2500
Discoverability
67
Needs work800
Content Readiness
67
Needs work1300
Bot Access Control
58
Needs work400
Agent Ease of Use
56
Needs work2241View details
API
44
Priority fix741View details
Auth
57
Needs work500
MCP
45
Priority fix200
Agent Commerce
58
Needs work700
Google Agentic Browsing
88
Mostly ready100
GEO, AIO and AEO
57
Needs work623View details
GEO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable300
AIO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable200
AEO Readiness
35
Priority fix123View details
SEO
100
Strong1000
SEO
100
Strong1000
Security & Trust
73
Needs work1700
Security & Trust
73
Needs work1700
Performance
54
Needs work1010View details
Performance
54
Needs work1010View details

Prioritized recommendations

Issues ranked by score impact

7 items need attention

Agent Ease of UseAPIEstablished

API Catalog

API Catalog failed at "Validate API catalog media type".

63 Fail

Needs attention

API Catalog

Failed check
01

Issue

Content-Type "text/html; charset=utf-8" is not valid for an RFC 9727 API catalog.

Details

02

Why it matters

API catalogs help agents find API endpoints, service descriptions, documentation, status resources, auth metadata, and related machine-readable contracts without guessing entry points.

Check name

API Catalog

Score

37/100

Status

fail

Category

API

Maturity

Established

Goal

Publish an API catalog for automated public API discovery using RFC 9727 when this origin exposes public APIs.

Result

API Catalog failed at "Validate API catalog media type".

Validation steps

  1. Check API catalog HEAD Link header

    HEAD /.well-known/api-catalog did not return a 2xx/3xx response.

    API catalog HEAD Link discovery is incomplete

  2. Validate API catalog media type

    Content-Type "text/html; charset=utf-8" is not valid for an RFC 9727 API catalog.

    API catalog media type is not application/linkset+json

  3. Validate Linkset shape

    Unexpected token '<', " <!DOCTYPE "... is not valid JSON

    API catalog Linkset shape is invalid

    Unexpected token '<', " <!DOCTYPE "... is not valid JSON

  4. Classify API catalog relations

    API catalog did not include API endpoint links or useful API discovery relations.

    API catalog lacks useful API relations

  5. Validate API catalog targets

    API catalog did not expose any href targets to validate.

    API catalog targets are unreachable or media types mismatch
Evidence log5 steps · 23 lines
Check API catalog HEAD Link header [warning]! HEAD /.well-known/api-catalog did not return a 2xx/3xx response.INFOCheck API catalog HEAD Link headerINFOSend HEAD request to API catalog path attempted=true statusCode=404 contentType="text/html"WARNCompare HEAD Link rel=api-catalog count actual=0 expected="> 0"WARNHEAD /.well-known/api-catalog did not return a 2xx/3xx response. status="warning"Validate API catalog media type [fail]! Content-Type "text/html; charset=utf-8" is not valid for an RFC 9727 API catalog.INFOValidate API catalog media typeFAILCompare API catalog media type actual="text/html; charset=utf-8" expected="application/linkset+json"FAILCompare JSON compatibility fallback actual=false expected=trueFAILContent-Type "text/html; charset=utf-8" is not valid for an RFC 9727 API catalog.Validate Linkset shape [fail]! Unexpected token '<', "



<!DOCTYPE "... is not valid JSONINFOValidate Linkset shapeFAILCompare Linkset JSON parse result actual=false expected=trueFAILCompare top-level linkset item count actual=0 expected="> 0"FAILCompare extracted href target count actual=0 expected="> 0"FAILLinkset shape issue issue="Unexpected token '<', \"\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<!DOCTYPE \"... is not valid JSON"FAILLinkset JSON parse error error="Unexpected token '<', \"\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<!DOCTYPE \"... is not valid JSON"FAILUnexpected token '<', "



<!DOCTYPE "... is not valid JSONClassify API catalog relations [fail]! API catalog did not include API endpoint links or useful API discovery relations.INFOClassify API catalog relationsINFOClassify API catalog relation types relations=[] summary={"registered":[],"metadata":[],"adjacent":[],"community":[],"legacy":[],"unknown":[]}FAILCompare registered or metadata API relation count actual=0 expected="> 0"FAILAPI catalog did not include API endpoint links or useful API discovery relations.Validate API catalog targets [fail]! API catalog did not expose any href targets to validate.INFOValidate API catalog targetsINFOFetch same-origin API catalog targets and record same-site/external skipsFAILCompare API catalog target failure count actual=0 expected=0FAILAPI catalog did not expose any href targets to validate.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Answer-first passages

AEO: Answer-first passages scored 0/100 and needs a fix.

7 Fail

Needs attention

AEO: Answer-first passages

Failed check
01

Issue

3 section(s) bury or omit a concise opening answer. No direct definition pattern was detected.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Answer-first passages

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Answer-first passages scored 0/100 and needs a fix.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Question and answer structure

AEO: Question and answer structure scored 47/100 and needs a fix.

4 Fail

Needs attention

AEO: Question and answer structure

Failed check
01

Issue

No natural question headings were detected. No visible FAQ or Q&A pattern was detected. Heading structure issues were detected.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Question and answer structure

Score

47/100

Status

fail

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Question and answer structure scored 47/100 and needs a fix.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Evidence and trust

AEO: Evidence and trust scored 57/100 and needs improvement.

3 Warning

Needs attention

AEO: Evidence and trust

Warning
01

Issue

Missing answer evidence or trust signals: author, publisher, freshnessDate.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Evidence and trust

Score

57/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Evidence and trust scored 57/100 and needs improvement.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Entity and definition clarity

AEO: Entity and definition clarity scored 70/100 and needs improvement.

2 Warning

Needs attention

AEO: Entity and definition clarity

Warning
01

Issue

Expected exactly one h1, found 2. No direct definition sentence was detected.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Entity and definition clarity

Score

70/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Entity and definition clarity scored 70/100 and needs improvement.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Extractable visible copy

AEO: Extractable visible copy scored 81/100 and needs improvement.

1 Warning

Needs attention

AEO: Extractable visible copy

Warning
01

Issue

Visible text has few answer-oriented terms or explanatory markers.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Extractable visible copy

Score

81/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Extractable visible copy scored 81/100 and needs improvement.

PerformancePerformanceBrowser audit

Avoid large layout shifts

100 Fail

Check name

Avoid large layout shifts

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Device

desktop

Category

Performance

Estimated savings

4 layout shifts found

Fix guidance

These are the largest layout shifts observed on the page. Each table item represents a single layout shift, and shows the element that shifted the most. Below each item are possible root causes that led to the layout shift. Some of these layout shifts may not be included in the CLS metric value due to [windowing](https://web.dev/articles/cls#what_is_cls). [Learn how to improve CLS](https://web.dev/articles/optimize-cls)

Evidence
{
  "displayValue": "4 layout shifts found",
  "description": "These are the largest layout shifts observed on the page. Each table item represents a single layout shift, and shows the element that shifted the most. Below each item are possible root causes that led to the layout shift. Some of these layout shifts may not be included in the CLS metric value due to [windowing](https://web.dev/articles/cls#what_is_cls). [Learn how to improve CLS](https://web.dev/articles/optimize-cls)"
}

Sign in to see 50 other issues and the full report

Create a free account to unlock every issue, evidence details, exports, and higher free limits.

Fix with MCP or CLI

Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.

Fix with MCP / CLI

Score history