Export Report
OVERALL SCORE
Level 3, Bot-Aware
- AI Discoverability 67 out of 100
- Agent Ease of Use 53 out of 100
- Security & Trust 55 out of 100
- GEO, AIO and AEO 50 out of 100
- SEO 100 out of 100
- Performance 96 out of 100
- Accessibility 33 out of 100
What AI sees of your website
Homepage - The Atavist Magazine
The Atavist Magazine publishes one incredible true story every month. We specialize in longform narratives, the kind you want to read to the very last word.
Next step
Turn this report into a fix workflow
1 failed check is ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.
| Metric | Score | Status | Passed | Failed | Warning | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI Discoverability | 67 | Needs work | 33 | 0 | 0 | |
| Discoverability | 67 | Needs work | 8 | 0 | 0 | |
| Content Readiness | 71 | Needs work | 22 | 0 | 0 | |
| Bot Access Control | 63 | Needs work | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| Agent Ease of Use | 53 | Needs work | 4 | 1 | 0 | View details |
| API | 67 | Needs work | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| Auth | 48 | Priority fix | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Google Agentic Browsing | 50 | Needs work | 1 | 1 | 0 | View details |
| GEO, AIO and AEO | 50 | Needs work | 4 | 0 | 0 | |
| GEO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| AIO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| AEO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| SEO | 100 | Strong | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| SEO | 100 | Strong | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| Security & Trust | 55 | Needs work | 11 | 1 | 0 | View details |
| Security & Trust | 55 | Needs work | 11 | 1 | 0 | View details |
| Performance | 96 | Strong | 16 | 1 | 0 | View details |
| Performance | 96 | Strong | 16 | 1 | 0 | View details |
Prioritized recommendations
Issues ranked by score impact
3 items need attention
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Content-Security-Policy
Content-Security-Policy failed at "Find enforcing CSP delivery".
60 Fail
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Content-Security-Policy
Content-Security-Policy failed at "Find enforcing CSP delivery".
Needs attention
Content-Security-Policy
Issue
Applicable HTML response is missing an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.
Details
Why it matters
Content Security Policy reduces the impact of injection bugs by limiting where scripts, styles, frames, forms, and other browser resources can load or execute.
Check name
Content-Security-Policy
Score
40/100
Status
fail
Category
Security & Trust
Maturity
Established
Goal
Constrain browser resource loading and script execution with an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.
Result
Content-Security-Policy failed at "Find enforcing CSP delivery".
Validation steps
Find enforcing CSP delivery
Applicable HTML response is missing an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.
Enforcing Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Find enforcing CSP delivery [fail]! Applicable HTML response is missing an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.INFOFind enforcing CSP deliveryINFORead CSP delivery headers enforcingHeader="missing" reportOnlyHeader="missing" metaPolicyCount=0 legacyHeadersPresent=[]FAILRequire enforcing Content-Security-Policy header actual="missing" expected="present" issue="Applicable HTML response is missing an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header."FAILApplicable HTML response is missing an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.Agent Ease of UseGoogle Agentic BrowsingBrowser audit
Accessibility tree is not well-formed
100 Fail
Agent Ease of UseGoogle Agentic BrowsingBrowser audit
Accessibility tree is not well-formed
Check name
Accessibility tree is not well-formed
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Device
desktop
Category
Google Agentic Browsing
Fix guidance
A well-formed [accessibility tree](http://goo.gle/lighthouse-agentic-a11y) helps AI agents to navigate and interact with the page.
Evidence
{
"description": "A well-formed [accessibility tree](http://goo.gle/lighthouse-agentic-a11y) helps AI agents to navigate and interact with the page."
}PerformancePerformanceBrowser audit
Font display
100 Fail
PerformancePerformanceBrowser audit
Font display
Check name
Font display
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Device
desktop
Category
Performance
Estimated savings
Est savings of 50Â ms
Fix guidance
Consider setting [font-display](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/font-display) to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with [font metric overrides](https://developer.chrome.com/blog/font-fallbacks).
References
web.dev/learn/performanceEvidence
{
"displayValue": "Est savings of 50Â ms",
"description": "Consider setting [font-display](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/font-display) to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with [font metric overrides](https://developer.chrome.com/blog/font-fallbacks)."
}Sign in to see 34 other issues and the full report
Create a free account to unlock every issue, evidence details, exports, and higher free limits.
Fix with MCP or CLI
Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.
Score history
Public scan score over time
Public reports for this website origin. Select any point or report link to open that canonical report.
| Scan date | Score | Readiness | Report |
|---|---|---|---|
| 58/100 | Level 3, Bot-Aware | Current report |