Export Report
OVERALL SCORE
Level 3, Bot-Aware
- AI Discoverability 32 out of 100
- Agent Ease of Use 59 out of 100
- Security & Trust 59 out of 100
- GEO, AIO and AEO 55 out of 100
- SEO 100 out of 100
- Performance 82 out of 100
- Accessibility 93 out of 100
What AI sees of your website
Built to change: Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Built to change. Unsere Haltung. Unsere Zukunft. Die Ruhr-Universität Bochum ist seit jeher ein Ort, an dem Talente unabhängig von ihrer sozialen oder geografischen Herkunft ihren akademischen Weg gehen und sich entfalten können.
Next step
Turn this report into a fix workflow
2 failed checks are ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.
| Metric | Score | Status | Passed | Failed | Warning | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI Discoverability | 32 | Priority fix | 13 | 3 | 1 | View details |
| Discoverability | 20 | Priority fix | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| Content Readiness | 27 | Priority fix | 10 | 2 | 1 | View details |
| Bot Access Control | 45 | Priority fix | 1 | 1 | 0 | View details |
| Agent Ease of Use | 59 | Needs work | 4 | 0 | 0 | |
| Auth | 47 | Priority fix | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Skill Discovery | 54 | Needs work | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Google Agentic Browsing | 100 | Strong | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| GEO, AIO and AEO | 55 | Needs work | 8 | 0 | 0 | |
| GEO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| AIO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| AEO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| SEO | 100 | Strong | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| SEO | 100 | Strong | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| Security & Trust | 59 | Needs work | 15 | 2 | 2 | View details |
| Security & Trust | 59 | Needs work | 15 | 2 | 2 | View details |
| Performance | 82 | Mostly ready | 14 | 0 | 0 | |
| Performance | 82 | Mostly ready | 14 | 0 | 0 |
Prioritized recommendations
Issues ranked by score impact
3 items need attention
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Author attribution
Author attribution is partially implemented.
70 Warning
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Author attribution
Author attribution is partially implemented.
Needs attention
Author attribution
Issue
No named author or publisher identity could be extracted.
Details
Why it matters
Author attribution helps agents cite content responsibly, assess source credibility, and distinguish editorial pages from anonymous marketing copy.
Check name
Author attribution
Score
30/100
Status
warning
Category
Content Readiness
Maturity
Established
Goal
Identify content authors or publishers for trust and attribution.
Result
Author attribution is partially implemented.
Validation steps
Schema.org attribution
Schema.org attribution is incomplete or relies only on publisher/fallback evidence.
Schema.org author attribution is missing or incomplete
Author identity quality
No named author or publisher identity could be extracted.
Author identity quality is incomplete
Visible byline parity
Structured author/publisher names were not found in visible byline text.
Author attribution does not match visible byline content
Evidence log3 steps · 12 lines
Schema.org attribution [warning]! Schema.org attribution is incomplete or relies only on publisher/fallback evidence.INFOSchema.org attributionINFOChecking structured data for author, creator, and publisher contributorsWARNCheck named Schema.org author count actual=0 expected="> 0" authorCount=0 publisherCount=0 namedContributors=0 authors=[] publishers=[] formats=[]WARNSchema.org attribution is incomplete or fallback-only authorCount=0 publisherCount=0 authors=[] publishers=[]Author identity quality [fail]! No named author or publisher identity could be extracted.INFOAuthor identity qualityINFOChecking contributors for stable identity signalsFAILCheck identified contributor count actual=0 expected="> 0" namedContributors=0 identifiedContributors=[] unidentifiedContributors=[]FAILNo named contributor identity could be extractedVisible byline parity [fail]! Structured author/publisher names were not found in visible byline text.INFOVisible byline parityINFOComparing structured contributor names with visible byline evidenceFAILCheck visible attribution matches actual=0 expected="> 0 or visible byline present" visibleByline=false bylineCount=0FAILNo visible byline parity found
AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEstablished
AI bot rules in robots.txt
AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".
69 Fail
AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEstablished
AI bot rules in robots.txt
AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".
Needs attention
AI bot rules in robots.txt
Issue
No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.
Details
Why it matters
AI crawler product tokens have different meanings. Explicit robots.txt groups make training, search, and retrieval access policy auditable for compliant crawler operators.
Check name
AI bot rules in robots.txt
Score
31/100
Status
fail
Category
Bot Access Control
Maturity
Established
Goal
Declare deliberate robots.txt rules for major AI training, AI search, user-triggered, and dataset crawlers.
Result
AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".
Validation steps
Classify AI crawler rules
No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.
robots.txt lacks explicit AI crawler rules
Evidence log1 step · 6 lines
Classify AI crawler rules [fail]! No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.INFOClassify AI crawler rulesINFOParsing User-agent groups and Allow/Disallow records for known AI crawler tokens evaluatedPath="/"INFOEvaluating exact User-agent matches before wildcard fallback exactAiPolicyCount=0 totalCrawlerTokens=18FAILNo explicit AI crawler User-agent groups were found examplesExpected=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ClaudeBot","Google-Extended","CCBot"]FAILCompare explicit AI crawler coverage actual=0 expected="> 0 explicit non-search AI crawler policies" missingTokens=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ChatGPT-User","ClaudeBot","Claude-SearchBot","Claude-User","Google-Extended","Applebot-Extended","Amazonbot","Amzn-SearchBot","Amzn-User","PerplexityBot"]INFOResolved effective root-path policy for crawler tokens blocked=0 allowed=21 unspecified=0Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Content-Security-Policy
Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate fetch baseline".
50 Fail
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Content-Security-Policy
Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate fetch baseline".
Needs attention
Content-Security-Policy
Issue
default-src is present but not meaningfully restrictive.
Details
Why it matters
Content Security Policy reduces the impact of injection bugs by limiting where scripts, styles, frames, forms, and other browser resources can load or execute.
Check name
Content-Security-Policy
Score
50/100
Status
fail
Category
Security & Trust
Maturity
Established
Goal
Constrain browser resource loading and script execution with an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.
Result
Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate fetch baseline".
Validation steps
Evaluate fetch baseline
default-src is present but not meaningfully restrictive.
CSP fetch baseline is too broad or missing
Evaluate script execution
default-src leaves script execution broadly unrestricted.
CSP script execution policy is unsafe
Review hardening directives
CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri.
CSP hardening directives are missing or weak
Review CSP reporting
CSP does not define a reporting endpoint.
CSP reporting is missing or incomplete
Evidence log4 steps · 16 lines
Evaluate fetch baseline [fail]! default-src is present but not meaningfully restrictive.INFOEvaluate fetch baselineINFOEvaluate resource loading fallback defaultSrc=["'self'","http:","https:","data:","blob:","'unsafe-inline'","'unsafe-eval'"] explicitFetchDirectives=[]FAILCompare fetch baseline actual=["'self'","http:","https:","data:","blob:","'unsafe-inline'","'unsafe-eval'"] expected="restricted default-src or broad explicit fetch coverage" issue="default-src is present but not meaningfully restrictive."FAILdefault-src is present but not meaningfully restrictive.Evaluate script execution [fail]! default-src leaves script execution broadly unrestricted.INFOEvaluate script executionINFOInspect effective script directive effectiveDirective="default-src" sources=["'self'","http:","https:","data:","blob:","'unsafe-inline'","'unsafe-eval'"]FAILCompare script execution posture actual={"hasNonce":false,"hasHash":false,"hasStrictDynamic":false,"hasUnsafeInline":true,"hasUnsafeEval":true,"hasWildcardHost":false,"hasBroadScheme":true,"dangerousSchemes":["data:","blob:"]} expected="constrained script sources without unsafe execution allowances" issue="default-src leaves script execution broadly unrestricted."FAILdefault-src leaves script execution broadly unrestricted.Review hardening directives [warning]! CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri.INFOReview hardening directivesINFOInspect CSP hardening directives objectSrcFallback=["'self'","http:","https:","data:","blob:","'unsafe-inline'","'unsafe-eval'"] formCount=0WARNCompare recommended hardening coverage actual=["object-src","base-uri"] expected="no missing object-src/base-uri/form-action requirements" issue="CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri."WARNCSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri.Review CSP reporting [warning]! CSP does not define a reporting endpoint.INFOReview CSP reportingINFOInspect CSP reporting directives reportOnlyHeaderPresent=false reportOnlyDirectives=[]WARNCompare violation reporting configuration actual="no reporting endpoint" expected="report-to or report-uri present" issue="CSP does not define a reporting endpoint."WARNCSP does not define a reporting endpoint.
Sign in to see 39 other issues and the full report
Create a free account to unlock every issue, evidence details, exports, and higher free limits.
Fix with MCP or CLI
Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.
Score history
Public scan score over time
Public reports for this website origin. Select any point or report link to open that canonical report.
| Scan date | Score | Readiness | Report |
|---|---|---|---|
| 58/100 | Level 3, Bot-Aware | Current report |