Rescan Report
Share Report
Copy Report Link
Rescan Report
Share Report
Copy Report Link
Export Report
45/100

OVERALL SCORE

Level 2, Agent-Limited

Priority improvements needed for AI agents
AIDiscoverability38%Agent Easeof Use49%Security& Trust54%GEO, AIO, AEO62%SEO92%Performance85%Accessibility0%
  • AI Discoverability 38 out of 100
  • Agent Ease of Use 49 out of 100
  • Security & Trust 54 out of 100
  • GEO, AIO and AEO 62 out of 100
  • SEO 92 out of 100
  • Performance 85 out of 100
  • Accessibility 0 out of 100

CAPTURED SCREENSHOT

Captured website desktop screenshot

What AI sees of your website

Create a Website for Free. Tilda Website Builder favicon

Create a Website for Free. Tilda Website Builder

Create a website, online store, landing page with Tilda intuitive website builder. Build your site from hundreds of pre-designed templates and publish it today. No code required.

Next step

Turn this report into a fix workflow

1 failed check is ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.

Detailed report scores grouped by capability area
MetricScoreStatusPassedFailedWarningEvidence
AI Discoverability
38
Priority fix1710View details
Discoverability
47
Priority fix600
Content Readiness
27
Priority fix1000
Bot Access Control
40
Priority fix110View details
Agent Ease of Use
49
Priority fix210View details
Auth
48
Priority fix100
Google Agentic Browsing
50
Needs work110View details
GEO, AIO and AEO
62
Needs work900
GEO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable300
AIO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable300
AEO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable300
SEO
92
Strong900
SEO
92
Strong900
Security & Trust
54
Needs work1000
Security & Trust
54
Needs work1000
Performance
85
Mostly ready1600
Performance
85
Mostly ready1600
Accessibility
0
Priority fix010View details
Accessibility
0
Priority fix010View details

Prioritized recommendations

Issues ranked by score impact

3 items need attention

AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEstablished

AI bot rules in robots.txt

AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".

69 Fail

Needs attention

AI bot rules in robots.txt

Failed check
01

Issue

No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.

02

Why it matters

AI crawler product tokens have different meanings. Explicit robots.txt groups make training, search, and retrieval access policy auditable for compliant crawler operators.

Check name

AI bot rules in robots.txt

Score

31/100

Status

fail

Category

Bot Access Control

Maturity

Established

Goal

Declare deliberate robots.txt rules for major AI training, AI search, user-triggered, and dataset crawlers.

Result

AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".

Validation steps

  1. Classify AI crawler rules

    No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.

Evidence log1 step · 6 lines
Classify AI crawler rules [fail]! No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.INFOClassify AI crawler rulesINFOParsing User-agent groups and Allow/Disallow records for known AI crawler tokens evaluatedPath="/"INFOEvaluating exact User-agent matches before wildcard fallback exactAiPolicyCount=0 totalCrawlerTokens=18FAILNo explicit AI crawler User-agent groups were found examplesExpected=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ClaudeBot","Google-Extended","CCBot"]FAILCompare explicit AI crawler coverage actual=0 expected="> 0 explicit non-search AI crawler policies" missingTokens=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ChatGPT-User","ClaudeBot","Claude-SearchBot","Claude-User","Google-Extended","Applebot-Extended","Amazonbot","Amzn-SearchBot","Amzn-User","PerplexityBot"]INFOResolved effective root-path policy for crawler tokens blocked=0 allowed=21 unspecified=0

AccessibilityAccessibilityBrowser audit

Accessibility audit

100 Fail

Check name

Accessibility audit

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Device

desktop

Category

Accessibility

Fix guidance

Make sure the page can load in Chrome and run Accessibility checks.

Evidence
{
  "error": "Execution context was destroyed, most likely because of a navigation."
}

Agent Ease of UseGoogle Agentic BrowsingBrowser audit

Accessibility tree is not well-formed

100 Fail

Check name

Accessibility tree is not well-formed

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Device

desktop

Category

Google Agentic Browsing

Fix guidance

A well-formed [accessibility tree](http://goo.gle/lighthouse-agentic-a11y) helps AI agents to navigate and interact with the page.

Evidence
{
  "description": "A well-formed [accessibility tree](http://goo.gle/lighthouse-agentic-a11y) helps AI agents to navigate and interact with the page."
}

Sign in to see 40 other issues and the full report

Create a free account to unlock every issue, evidence details, exports, and higher free limits.

Development Note:

Please configure GOOGLE_CLIENT_ID in .env to activate live login.

Fix with MCP or CLI

Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.

Score history

Public scan score over time

Public reports for this website origin. Select any point or report link to open that canonical report.

1 reports
Public score history report links
Scan dateScoreReadinessReport
45/100Level 2, Agent-LimitedCurrent report