Rescan Report
Share Report
Copy Report Link
Rescan Report
Share Report
Copy Report Link
Export Report
44/100

OVERALL SCORE

Level 2, Agent-Limited

Priority improvements needed for AI agents
AIDiscoverability53%Agent Easeof Use45%Security& Trust52%GEO, AIO, AEO56%SEO77%Performance56%Accessibility0%
  • AI Discoverability 53 out of 100
  • Agent Ease of Use 45 out of 100
  • Security & Trust 52 out of 100
  • GEO, AIO and AEO 56 out of 100
  • SEO 77 out of 100
  • Performance 56 out of 100
  • Accessibility 0 out of 100

CAPTURED SCREENSHOT

Captured website desktop screenshot

What AI sees of your website

Western Union: Send & Receive Money in India favicon

Western Union: Send & Receive Money in India

Send and receive money transfers from India with Western Union. Check exchange rates, track transfers and send money online instantly.

Next step

Turn this report into a fix workflow

2 failed checks are ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.

Detailed report scores grouped by capability area
MetricScoreStatusPassedFailedWarningEvidence
AI Discoverability
53
Needs work2332View details
Discoverability
63
Needs work700
Content Readiness
57
Needs work1500
Bot Access Control
41
Priority fix132View details
Agent Ease of Use
45
Priority fix410View details
Auth
49
Priority fix400
Google Agentic Browsing
20
Priority fix010View details
GEO, AIO and AEO
56
Needs work700
GEO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable200
AIO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable300
AEO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable200
SEO
77
Mostly ready700
SEO
77
Mostly ready700
Security & Trust
52
Needs work900
Security & Trust
52
Needs work900
Performance
56
Needs work1600
Performance
56
Needs work1600

Prioritized recommendations

Issues ranked by score impact

3 items need attention

AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEmerging recommendation

ai.txt policy

ai.txt policy failed at "Fetch /ai.txt".

39 Fail

Needs attention

ai.txt policy

Failed check
01

Issue

/ai.txt returned HTTP 403.

02

Why it matters

ai.txt is a fragmented emerging convention. It can communicate human-readable AI crawling, training, attribution, restriction, and contact guidance, but it is not a standard access-control mechanism and absence should not be penalized.

Check name

ai.txt policy

Score

23/100

Status

fail

Category

Bot Access Control

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish an advisory human-readable AI usage policy only when the site intentionally needs one.

Result

ai.txt policy failed at "Fetch /ai.txt".

Validation steps

  1. Fetch /ai.txt

    /ai.txt returned HTTP 403.

  2. Validate transport

    ai.txt was served as application/xml; text/plain is preferred.

  3. Parse ai.txt policy

    ai.txt is present but does not follow the AI Visibility section model.

  4. Validate policy content

    ai.txt is too short to provide useful advisory policy guidance.

Evidence log4 steps · 18 lines
Fetch /ai.txt [fail]! /ai.txt returned HTTP 403.INFOFetch /ai.txtINFORequesting optional advisory policy file at /ai.txtFAILCompare /ai.txt HTTP response actual=403 expected="2xx when ai.txt is intentionally published; 404/410 means absent optional file" contentType="application/xml" length=111FAIL/ai.txt returned HTTP 403. statusCode=403Validate transport [warning]! ai.txt was served as application/xml; text/plain is preferred.INFOValidate transportINFOChecking ai.txt media type, size, line count, and whether the response looks like plain text contentType="application/xml" length=111 lineCount=2WARNCompare media type to preferred text/plain transport actual="application/xml" expected="text/plain preferred; readable text required"WARNai.txt was served as application/xml; text/plain is preferred. warnings=["ai.txt was served as application/xml; text/plain is preferred."]Parse ai.txt policy [warning]! ai.txt is present but does not follow the AI Visibility section model.INFOParse ai.txt policyINFODetecting ai.txt convention from bracket sections, frontmatter, headings, and ai.txt context linksINFODetected policy structure convention="unknown-text" sections=[] markdownHeadings=[]WARNCheck AI Visibility required sections actual="missing identity, permissions, restrictions" expected="identity, permissions, and restrictions" missingRecommended=["attribution","contact","content-types"]WARNai.txt is present but does not follow the AI Visibility section model.Validate policy content [fail]! ai.txt is too short to provide useful advisory policy guidance.INFOValidate policy contentINFOChecking required section content, permission/restriction language, attribution, contact details, and safety risks convention="unknown-text"INFODetected policy signals hasPermissionLanguage=false hasRestrictionLanguage=false hasTrainingLanguage=false hasAttributionLanguage=false hasContact=falseFAILCheck required and recommended section coverage actual={"missingRequired":["identity","permissions","restrictions"],"missingRecommended":["attribution","contact","content-types"]} expected={"missingRequired":[],"recommendedPresentWhenPossible":true}FAILai.txt is too short to provide useful advisory policy guidance.

AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEstablished

AI bot rules in robots.txt

AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".

35 Fail

Needs attention

AI bot rules in robots.txt

Failed check
01

Issue

No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.

02

Why it matters

AI crawler product tokens have different meanings. Explicit robots.txt groups make training, search, and retrieval access policy auditable for compliant crawler operators.

Check name

AI bot rules in robots.txt

Score

31/100

Status

fail

Category

Bot Access Control

Maturity

Established

Goal

Declare deliberate robots.txt rules for major AI training, AI search, user-triggered, and dataset crawlers.

Result

AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".

Validation steps

  1. Classify AI crawler rules

    No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.

Evidence log1 step · 6 lines
Classify AI crawler rules [fail]! No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.INFOClassify AI crawler rulesINFOParsing User-agent groups and Allow/Disallow records for known AI crawler tokens evaluatedPath="/"INFOEvaluating exact User-agent matches before wildcard fallback exactAiPolicyCount=0 totalCrawlerTokens=18FAILNo explicit AI crawler User-agent groups were found examplesExpected=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ClaudeBot","Google-Extended","CCBot"]FAILCompare explicit AI crawler coverage actual=0 expected="> 0 explicit non-search AI crawler policies" missingTokens=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ChatGPT-User","ClaudeBot","Claude-SearchBot","Claude-User","Google-Extended","Applebot-Extended","Amazonbot","Amzn-SearchBot","Amzn-User","PerplexityBot"]INFOResolved effective root-path policy for crawler tokens blocked=0 allowed=21 unspecified=0

Agent Ease of UseGoogle Agentic BrowsingBrowser audit

Accessibility tree is not well-formed

100 Fail

Check name

Accessibility tree is not well-formed

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Device

desktop

Category

Google Agentic Browsing

Fix guidance

A well-formed [accessibility tree](http://goo.gle/lighthouse-agentic-a11y) helps AI agents to navigate and interact with the page.

Evidence
{
  "description": "A well-formed [accessibility tree](http://goo.gle/lighthouse-agentic-a11y) helps AI agents to navigate and interact with the page."
}

Sign in to see 49 other issues and the full report

Create a free account to unlock every issue, evidence details, exports, and higher free limits.

Email code

Fix with MCP or CLI

Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.

Score history

Public scan score over time

Public reports for this website origin. Select any point or report link to open that canonical report.

1 reports
Public score history report links
Scan dateScoreReadinessReport
44/100Level 2, Agent-LimitedCurrent report