Export Report
OVERALL SCORE
Level 3, Bot-Aware
- AI Discoverability 58 out of 100
- Agent Ease of Use 54 out of 100
- Security & Trust 60 out of 100
- GEO, AIO and AEO 58 out of 100
- SEO 92 out of 100
- Performance 86 out of 100
- Accessibility 40 out of 100
What AI sees of your website
Android | Do More With Google on Android Phones & Devices
Discover more about Android & learn how our devices can help you Do more with Google with hyper connectivity, powerful protection, Google apps & Quick Share.
Next step
Turn this report into a fix workflow
3 failed checks are ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.
| Metric | Score | Status | Passed | Failed | Warning | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI Discoverability | 58 | Needs work | 22 | 0 | 0 | |
| Discoverability | 67 | Needs work | 8 | 0 | 0 | |
| Content Readiness | 42 | Priority fix | 11 | 0 | 0 | |
| Bot Access Control | 63 | Needs work | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| Agent Ease of Use | 54 | Needs work | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| API | 67 | Needs work | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| GEO, AIO and AEO | 58 | Needs work | 6 | 0 | 0 | |
| GEO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| AIO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| AEO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| SEO | 92 | Strong | 9 | 0 | 0 | |
| SEO | 92 | Strong | 9 | 0 | 0 | |
| Security & Trust | 60 | Needs work | 14 | 3 | 4 | View details |
| Security & Trust | 60 | Needs work | 14 | 3 | 4 | View details |
| Performance | 86 | Mostly ready | 16 | 0 | 0 | |
| Performance | 86 | Mostly ready | 16 | 0 | 0 |
Prioritized recommendations
Issues ranked by score impact
3 items need attention
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Frame protection
Frame protection failed at "Validate X-Frame-Options".
19 Fail
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Frame protection
Frame protection failed at "Validate X-Frame-Options".
Needs attention
Frame protection
Issue
No valid X-Frame-Options fallback is present.
Why it matters
Frame protection blocks hostile sites from embedding pages in deceptive frames, reducing clickjacking and UI redressing risk.
Check name
Frame protection
Score
44/100
Status
fail
Category
Security & Trust
Maturity
Established
Goal
Prevent unwanted framing with an enforcing CSP frame-ancestors directive or a valid X-Frame-Options fallback.
Result
Frame protection failed at "Validate X-Frame-Options".
Validation steps
Validate CSP frame-ancestors
No enforcing CSP frame-ancestors directive is present.
Validate X-Frame-Options
No valid X-Frame-Options fallback is present.
Review observed browser responses
One or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit valid frame protection.
Evidence log3 steps · 12 lines
Validate CSP frame-ancestors [warning]! No enforcing CSP frame-ancestors directive is present.INFOValidate CSP frame-ancestorsINFORead CSP frame-ancestors signals enforcingHeaderPresent=true reportOnlyHeaderPresent=true metaFrameAncestors=false policyCount=1 duplicateDirectives=[]WARNCompare effective frame-ancestors directive actual="missing" expected="valid restrictive enforcing frame-ancestors" issue="No enforcing CSP frame-ancestors directive is present."WARNNo enforcing CSP frame-ancestors directive is present.Validate X-Frame-Options [fail]! No valid X-Frame-Options fallback is present.INFOValidate X-Frame-OptionsINFORead X-Frame-Options fallback value="missing" parsedValues=[] normalizedValues=[]FAILCompare X-Frame-Options value actual="missing" expected="DENY or SAMEORIGIN" valid=false obsoleteAllowFrom=false duplicateOrConflicting=false issue="No valid X-Frame-Options fallback is present."FAILNo valid X-Frame-Options fallback is present.Review observed browser responses [warning]! One or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit valid frame protection.INFOReview observed browser responsesINFOSample Chrome-observed same-origin responses observedResponseCount=53 sameOriginCount=1 htmlDocumentCount=1WARNCompare observed HTML frame protection actual={"missingOrInvalidFrameProtectionCount":1,"broadFrameAncestorsCount":0,"affected":[{"url":"https://www.android.com/","status":200,"resourceType":"document","contentType":"text/html","contentSecurityPolicy":"script-src 'nonce-AZCUdnH6a6C8MhpBJM4a2w' 'report-sample' 'strict-dynamic' 'unsafe-eval' 'unsafe-hashes' 'unsafe-inline' http: https:; object-src 'none'; report-uri https://csp.withgoogle.com/csp/uxe-owners-acl/android; base-uri 'self'","contentSecurityPolicyReportOnly":"require-trusted-types-for 'script'; report-uri https://csp.withgoogle.com/csp/uxe-owners-acl/android"}]} expected="0 missing/invalid or broad same-origin HTML responses" issue="One or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit valid frame protection."WARNOne or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit valid frame protection.
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
HSTS header
HSTS header failed at "Find Strict-Transport-Security".
17 Fail
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
HSTS header
HSTS header failed at "Find Strict-Transport-Security".
Needs attention
HSTS header
Issue
HTTPS response is missing Strict-Transport-Security.
Why it matters
HSTS tells browsers to keep using HTTPS after the first secure visit, reducing downgrade, SSL-stripping, and mixed-transport risk for repeat users.
Check name
HSTS header
Score
50/100
Status
fail
Category
Security & Trust
Maturity
Established
Goal
Require HTTPS for repeat browser visits with a valid Strict-Transport-Security policy.
Result
HSTS header failed at "Find Strict-Transport-Security".
Validation steps
Find Strict-Transport-Security
HTTPS response is missing Strict-Transport-Security.
Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Find Strict-Transport-Security [fail]! HTTPS response is missing Strict-Transport-Security.INFOFind Strict-Transport-SecurityINFORead Strict-Transport-Security header header="strict-transport-security" value="missing" effectiveValue=null duplicateHeaderValueCount=0FAILRequire HSTS header on HTTPS response actual="missing" expected="present" issue="HTTPS response is missing Strict-Transport-Security."FAILHTTPS response is missing Strict-Transport-Security.Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Content-Security-Policy
Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate fetch baseline".
12 Fail
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Content-Security-Policy
Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate fetch baseline".
Needs attention
Content-Security-Policy
Issue
CSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback.
Why it matters
Content Security Policy reduces the impact of injection bugs by limiting where scripts, styles, frames, forms, and other browser resources can load or execute.
Check name
Content-Security-Policy
Score
65/100
Status
fail
Category
Security & Trust
Maturity
Established
Goal
Constrain browser resource loading and script execution with an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.
Result
Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate fetch baseline".
Validation steps
Evaluate fetch baseline
CSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback.
Evaluate script execution
script-src allows unsafe-eval.
Review hardening directives
CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: form-action.
Evidence log3 steps · 12 lines
Evaluate fetch baseline [fail]! CSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback.INFOEvaluate fetch baselineINFOEvaluate resource loading fallback explicitFetchDirectives=["object-src","script-src"]FAILCompare fetch baseline actual="0 explicit fetch directives" expected="restricted default-src or broad explicit fetch coverage" issue="CSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback."FAILCSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback.Evaluate script execution [warning]! script-src allows unsafe-eval.INFOEvaluate script executionINFOInspect effective script directive effectiveDirective="script-src" sources=["'nonce-AZCUdnH6a6C8MhpBJM4a2w'","'report-sample'","'strict-dynamic'","'unsafe-eval'","'unsafe-hashes'","'unsafe-inline'","http:","https:"]WARNCompare script execution posture actual={"hasNonce":true,"hasHash":false,"hasStrictDynamic":true,"hasUnsafeInline":true,"hasUnsafeEval":true,"hasWildcardHost":false,"hasBroadScheme":true,"dangerousSchemes":[]} expected="constrained script sources without unsafe execution allowances" issue="script-src allows unsafe-eval."WARNscript-src allows unsafe-eval.Review hardening directives [warning]! CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: form-action.INFOReview hardening directivesINFOInspect CSP hardening directives objectSrc=["'none'"] baseUri=["'self'"] formCount=1WARNCompare recommended hardening coverage actual=["form-action"] expected="no missing object-src/base-uri/form-action requirements" issue="CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: form-action."WARNCSP is missing recommended hardening directives: form-action.
Sign in to see 39 other issues and the full report
Create a free account to unlock every issue, evidence details, exports, and higher free limits.
Development Note:
Please configure GOOGLE_CLIENT_ID in .env to activate live login.
Fix with MCP or CLI
Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.
Score history
Public scan score over time
Public reports for this website origin. Select any point or report link to open that canonical report.
| Scan date | Score | Readiness | Report |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60/100 | Level 3, Bot-Aware | Current report |