Export Report
OVERALL SCORE
Level 3, Bot-Aware
- AI Discoverability 61 out of 100
- Agent Ease of Use 49 out of 100
- Security & Trust 70 out of 100
- GEO, AIO and AEO 68 out of 100
- SEO 100 out of 100
- Performance 95 out of 100
- Accessibility 100 out of 100
What AI sees of your website
Elsevier | A global leader for advanced information and decision support in science and healthcare
Elsevier provides advanced information and decision support to accelerate progress in science and healthcare worldwide.
Next step
Turn this report into a fix workflow
1 failed check is ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.
| Metric | Score | Status | Passed | Failed | Warning | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI Discoverability | 61 | Needs work | 32 | 2 | 1 | View details |
| Discoverability | 67 | Needs work | 8 | 0 | 0 | |
| Content Readiness | 60 | Needs work | 19 | 1 | 1 | View details |
| Bot Access Control | 58 | Needs work | 5 | 1 | 0 | View details |
| Agent Ease of Use | 49 | Priority fix | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Auth | 48 | Priority fix | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| GEO, AIO and AEO | 68 | Needs work | 11 | 1 | 2 | View details |
| GEO Readiness | 61 | Needs work | 3 | 1 | 2 | View details |
| AIO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 5 | 0 | 0 | |
| AEO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| SEO | 100 | Strong | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| SEO | 100 | Strong | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| Security & Trust | 70 | Needs work | 14 | 0 | 0 | |
| Security & Trust | 70 | Needs work | 14 | 0 | 0 | |
| Performance | 95 | Strong | 18 | 0 | 0 | |
| Performance | 95 | Strong | 18 | 0 | 0 |
Prioritized recommendations
Issues ranked by score impact
5 items need attention
AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEstablished
AI bot rules in robots.txt
AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".
69 Fail
AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEstablished
AI bot rules in robots.txt
AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".
Needs attention
AI bot rules in robots.txt
Issue
No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.
Why it matters
AI crawler product tokens have different meanings. Explicit robots.txt groups make training, search, and retrieval access policy auditable for compliant crawler operators.
Check name
AI bot rules in robots.txt
Score
31/100
Status
fail
Category
Bot Access Control
Maturity
Established
Goal
Declare deliberate robots.txt rules for major AI training, AI search, user-triggered, and dataset crawlers.
Result
AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".
Validation steps
Classify AI crawler rules
No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.
Evidence log1 step · 6 lines
Classify AI crawler rules [fail]! No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.INFOClassify AI crawler rulesINFOParsing User-agent groups and Allow/Disallow records for known AI crawler tokens evaluatedPath="/"INFOEvaluating exact User-agent matches before wildcard fallback exactAiPolicyCount=0 totalCrawlerTokens=18FAILNo explicit AI crawler User-agent groups were found examplesExpected=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ClaudeBot","Google-Extended","CCBot"]FAILCompare explicit AI crawler coverage actual=0 expected="> 0 explicit non-search AI crawler policies" missingTokens=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ChatGPT-User","ClaudeBot","Claude-SearchBot","Claude-User","Google-Extended","Applebot-Extended","Amazonbot","Amzn-SearchBot","Amzn-User","PerplexityBot"]INFOResolved effective root-path policy for crawler tokens blocked=0 allowed=21 unspecified=0AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Author attribution
Author attribution is partially implemented.
45 Warning
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Author attribution
Author attribution is partially implemented.
Needs attention
Author attribution
Issue
No named author or publisher identity could be extracted.
Why it matters
Author attribution helps agents cite content responsibly, assess source credibility, and distinguish editorial pages from anonymous marketing copy.
Check name
Author attribution
Score
55/100
Status
warning
Category
Content Readiness
Maturity
Established
Goal
Identify content authors or publishers for trust and attribution.
Result
Author attribution is partially implemented.
Validation steps
Schema.org attribution
Schema.org attribution is incomplete or relies only on publisher/fallback evidence.
Author identity quality
No named author or publisher identity could be extracted.
Evidence log2 steps · 8 lines
Schema.org attribution [warning]! Schema.org attribution is incomplete or relies only on publisher/fallback evidence.INFOSchema.org attributionINFOChecking structured data for author, creator, and publisher contributorsWARNCheck named Schema.org author count actual=0 expected="> 0" authorCount=0 publisherCount=0 namedContributors=0 authors=[] publishers=[] formats=[]WARNSchema.org attribution is incomplete or fallback-only authorCount=0 publisherCount=0 authors=[] publishers=[]Author identity quality [fail]! No named author or publisher identity could be extracted.INFOAuthor identity qualityINFOChecking contributors for stable identity signalsFAILCheck identified contributor count actual=0 expected="> 0" namedContributors=0 identifiedContributors=[] unidentifiedContributors=[]FAILNo named contributor identity could be extracted
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
GEO: Citable passages
GEO: Citable passages scored 0/100 and needs a fix.
12 Fail
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
GEO: Citable passages
GEO: Citable passages scored 0/100 and needs a fix.
Needs attention
GEO: Citable passages
Issue
No evidence-backed, citation-length explanatory paragraph was found.
Details
Why it matters
Generative answer systems work best with visible, self-contained, evidence-backed content, clear entities, trustworthy attribution, structured page sections, and crawler-accessible HTML. These signals improve machine understanding even though they do not guarantee AI citations.
Check name
GEO: Citable passages
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content easy for AI answer engines to extract, cite, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.
Result
GEO: Citable passages scored 0/100 and needs a fix.
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
GEO: Source and trust signals
GEO: Source and trust signals scored 50/100 and needs improvement.
6 Warning
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
GEO: Source and trust signals
GEO: Source and trust signals scored 50/100 and needs improvement.
Needs attention
GEO: Source and trust signals
Issue
Missing source or trust signals: authorOrOwner, freshnessDate, entityLinks.
Details
Why it matters
Generative answer systems work best with visible, self-contained, evidence-backed content, clear entities, trustworthy attribution, structured page sections, and crawler-accessible HTML. These signals improve machine understanding even though they do not guarantee AI citations.
Check name
GEO: Source and trust signals
Score
50/100
Status
warning
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content easy for AI answer engines to extract, cite, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.
Result
GEO: Source and trust signals scored 50/100 and needs improvement.
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
GEO: Structured extraction
GEO: Structured extraction scored 88/100 and needs improvement.
1 Warning
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
GEO: Structured extraction
GEO: Structured extraction scored 88/100 and needs improvement.
Needs attention
GEO: Structured extraction
Issue
Missing or weak extraction signals: summary or key takeaways.
Details
Why it matters
Generative answer systems work best with visible, self-contained, evidence-backed content, clear entities, trustworthy attribution, structured page sections, and crawler-accessible HTML. These signals improve machine understanding even though they do not guarantee AI citations.
Check name
GEO: Structured extraction
Score
88/100
Status
warning
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content easy for AI answer engines to extract, cite, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.
Result
GEO: Structured extraction scored 88/100 and needs improvement.
Sign in to see 32 other issues and the full report
Create a free account to unlock every issue, evidence details, exports, and higher free limits.
Development Note:
Please configure GOOGLE_CLIENT_ID in .env to activate live login.
Fix with MCP or CLI
Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.
Score history
Public scan score over time
Public reports for this website origin. Select any point or report link to open that canonical report.
| Scan date | Score | Readiness | Report |
|---|---|---|---|
| 68/100 | Level 3, Bot-Aware | Current report | |
| 68/100 | Level 3, Bot-Aware | View report |