Rescan Report
Share Report
Copy Report Link
Rescan Report
Share Report
Copy Report Link
Export Report
44/100

OVERALL SCORE

Level 2, Agent-Limited

Priority improvements needed for AI agents
AIDiscoverability51%Agent Easeof Use51%Security& Trust53%GEO, AIO, AEO44%SEO83%Performance60%Accessibility0%
  • AI Discoverability 51 out of 100
  • Agent Ease of Use 51 out of 100
  • Security & Trust 53 out of 100
  • GEO, AIO and AEO 44 out of 100
  • SEO 83 out of 100
  • Performance 60 out of 100
  • Accessibility 0 out of 100

CAPTURED SCREENSHOT

Captured website desktop screenshot

What AI sees of your website

IntechOpen - Open Science Open Minds | IntechOpen favicon

IntechOpen - Open Science Open Minds | IntechOpen

IntechOpen is a leading global publisher of Journals and Books within the fields of Science, Technology and Medicine. We are the preferred choice of over 60,000 authors worldwide.

Detailed report scores grouped by capability area
MetricScoreStatusPassedFailedWarningEvidence
AI Discoverability
51
Needs work1811View details
Discoverability
67
Needs work800
Content Readiness
24
Priority fix811View details
Bot Access Control
60
Needs work200
Agent Ease of Use
51
Needs work210View details
API
67
Needs work100
Google Agentic Browsing
40
Priority fix110View details
GEO, AIO and AEO
44
Priority fix500
GEO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable100
AIO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable200
AEO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable200
SEO
83
Mostly ready700
SEO
83
Mostly ready700
Security & Trust
53
Needs work1100
Security & Trust
53
Needs work1100
Performance
60
Needs work910View details
Performance
60
Needs work910View details

Prioritized recommendations

Issues ranked by score impact

3 items need attention

AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished

Author attribution

Author attribution is partially implemented.

45 Warning

Needs attention

Author attribution

Warning
01

Issue

No named author or publisher identity could be extracted.

02

Why it matters

Author attribution helps agents cite content responsibly, assess source credibility, and distinguish editorial pages from anonymous marketing copy.

Check name

Author attribution

Score

55/100

Status

warning

Category

Content Readiness

Maturity

Established

Goal

Identify content authors or publishers for trust and attribution.

Result

Author attribution is partially implemented.

Validation steps

  1. Schema.org attribution

    Schema.org attribution is incomplete or relies only on publisher/fallback evidence.

  2. Author identity quality

    No named author or publisher identity could be extracted.

Evidence log2 steps · 8 lines
Schema.org attribution [warning]! Schema.org attribution is incomplete or relies only on publisher/fallback evidence.INFOSchema.org attributionINFOChecking structured data for author, creator, and publisher contributorsWARNCheck named Schema.org author count actual=0 expected="> 0" authorCount=0 publisherCount=0 namedContributors=0 authors=[] publishers=[] formats=[]WARNSchema.org attribution is incomplete or fallback-only authorCount=0 publisherCount=0 authors=[] publishers=[]Author identity quality [fail]! No named author or publisher identity could be extracted.INFOAuthor identity qualityINFOChecking contributors for stable identity signalsFAILCheck identified contributor count actual=0 expected="> 0" namedContributors=0 identifiedContributors=[] unidentifiedContributors=[]FAILNo named contributor identity could be extracted

Agent Ease of UseGoogle Agentic BrowsingBrowser audit

Accessibility tree is not well-formed

100 Fail

Check name

Accessibility tree is not well-formed

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Device

desktop

Category

Google Agentic Browsing

Fix guidance

A well-formed [accessibility tree](http://goo.gle/lighthouse-agentic-a11y) helps AI agents to navigate and interact with the page.

Evidence
{
  "description": "A well-formed [accessibility tree](http://goo.gle/lighthouse-agentic-a11y) helps AI agents to navigate and interact with the page."
}

PerformancePerformanceBrowser audit

Avoid large layout shifts

100 Fail

Check name

Avoid large layout shifts

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Device

desktop

Category

Performance

Estimated savings

2 layout shifts found

Fix guidance

These are the largest layout shifts observed on the page. Each table item represents a single layout shift, and shows the element that shifted the most. Below each item are possible root causes that led to the layout shift. Some of these layout shifts may not be included in the CLS metric value due to [windowing](https://web.dev/articles/cls#what_is_cls). [Learn how to improve CLS](https://web.dev/articles/optimize-cls)

Evidence
{
  "displayValue": "2 layout shifts found",
  "description": "These are the largest layout shifts observed on the page. Each table item represents a single layout shift, and shows the element that shifted the most. Below each item are possible root causes that led to the layout shift. Some of these layout shifts may not be included in the CLS metric value due to [windowing](https://web.dev/articles/cls#what_is_cls). [Learn how to improve CLS](https://web.dev/articles/optimize-cls)"
}

Sign in to see 50 other issues and the full report

Create a free account to unlock every issue, evidence details, exports, and higher free limits.

Email code

Fix with MCP or CLI

Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.

Score history

Public scan score over time

Public reports for this website origin. Select any point or report link to open that canonical report.

1 reports
Public score history report links
Scan dateScoreReadinessReport
44/100Level 2, Agent-LimitedCurrent report