Rescan Report
Share Report
Copy Report Link
Rescan Report
Share Report
Copy Report Link
Export Report
56/100

OVERALL SCORE

Level 3, Bot-Aware

Moderate readiness for AI agents
AIDiscoverability46%Agent Easeof Use65%Security& Trust54%GEO, AIO, AEO61%SEO100%Performance& Accessibility67%
  • AI Discoverability 46 out of 100
  • Agent Ease of Use 65 out of 100
  • Security & Trust 54 out of 100
  • GEO, AIO and AEO 61 out of 100
  • SEO 100 out of 100
  • Performance and Accessibility 67 out of 100

CAPTURED SCREENSHOT

Captured website desktop screenshot

What AI sees of your website

Identity Verification - Global IDV to Ensure KYC Compliance | Plaid favicon

Identity Verification - Global IDV to Ensure KYC Compliance | Plaid

Verify your users’ identities, around the world. Ensure know your customer (KYC) and customer due diligence (CDD) compliance while improving conversion rates.

Next step

Turn this report into a fix workflow

11 failed checks are ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.

Detailed report scores grouped by capability area
MetricScoreStatusPassedFailedWarningEvidence
AI Discoverability
46
Priority fix21166View details
Discoverability
47
Priority fix630View details
Content Readiness
46
Priority fix14123View details
Bot Access Control
45
Priority fix113View details
Agent Ease of Use
65
Needs work2012
Auth
50
Needs work003
MCP
50
Needs work003
Skill Discovery
50
Needs work005
Agent Commerce
79
Mostly ready201
GEO, AIO and AEO
61
Needs work837View details
GEO Readiness
61
Needs work312View details
AIO Readiness
80
Mostly ready303
AEO Readiness
42
Priority fix222View details
SEO
100
Strong1000
SEO
100
Strong1000
Security & Trust
54
Needs work1145View details
Security & Trust
54
Needs work1145View details
Performance and Accessibility
67
Needs work1871View details
Performance
49
Priority fix1261View details
Accessibility
99
Strong610View details

Prioritized recommendations

Issues ranked by score impact

47 items need attention

AI DiscoverabilityDiscoverabilityEstablished

Link headers

Link headers failed at "Find useful Link headers".

50 Fail

Needs attention

Link headers

Failed check
01

Issue

No useful agent discovery Link headers were found.

02

Why it matters

Link headers let automated clients discover API catalogs, documentation, and machine-readable alternates without parsing page markup first.

Check name

Link headers

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Category

Discoverability

Maturity

Established

Goal

Include Link response headers for agent discovery using RFC 8288.

Result

Link headers failed at "Find useful Link headers".

Validation steps

  1. Find useful Link headers

    No useful agent discovery Link headers were found.

  2. Fetch same-origin Link header targets

    Link headers did not expose any same-origin targets to validate.

Evidence log2 steps · 9 lines
Find useful Link headers [fail]! No useful agent discovery Link headers were found.INFOFind useful Link headersINFOParse response Link header linkCount=0FAILCompare registered agent-useful relation count actual=0 expected="> 0"FAILCompare community relation count actual=0 expected="accepted as weaker evidence"FAILNo useful agent discovery Link headers were found.Fetch same-origin Link header targets [fail]! Link headers did not expose any same-origin targets to validate.INFOFetch same-origin Link header targetsINFOFetch same-origin Link header targets and record external skipsFAILCompare same-origin Link target failures actual=1 expected=0FAILLink headers did not expose any same-origin targets to validate.

AI DiscoverabilityDiscoverabilityEstablished

robots.txt

robots.txt failed at "Validate RFC 9309 core syntax".

30 Fail

Needs attention

robots.txt

Failed check
01

Issue

robots.txt was found but did not contain a valid, parseable User-agent group.

02

Why it matters

robots.txt gives crawlers and agents a standard place to read crawl permissions, disallowed paths, and sitemap locations before requesting site content.

Check name

robots.txt

Score

40/100

Status

fail

Category

Discoverability

Maturity

Established

Goal

Publish /robots.txt with clear crawl rules.

Result

robots.txt failed at "Validate RFC 9309 core syntax".

Validation steps

  1. Validate RFC 9309 core syntax

    robots.txt was found but did not contain a valid, parseable User-agent group.

Evidence log1 step · 5 lines
Validate RFC 9309 core syntax [fail]! robots.txt was found but did not contain a valid, parseable User-agent group.INFOValidate RFC 9309 core syntaxINFOParsing robots.txt into User-agent groups and Allow/Disallow recordsPASSCheck User-agent group count actual=1 expected=">= 1 parseable group" parsedUserAgents=["*"]FAILCheck malformed lines and orphan Allow/Disallow records actual={"invalidLines":0,"orphanRecords":18} expected={"invalidLines":0,"orphanRecords":0}FAILAllow/Disallow records appeared before any User-agent group orphanRecords=[{"directive":"allow","value":"*.png","line":4},{"directive":"allow","value":"*.svg","line":5},{"directive":"disallow","value":"*.pdf","line":8},{"directive":"disallow","value":"/legacy-docs/","line":11},{"directive":"disallow","value":"/api/*","line":12}]

Agent Ease of UseMCPEmerging recommendation

MCP Server Card

MCP Server Card has a validation warning at "Discover MCP server card".

25 Warning

Needs attention

MCP Server Card

Warning
01

Issue

No MCP server card was found at current, transitional, or linked discovery paths.

02

Why it matters

MCP server cards give agents a stable, public pre-connection discovery surface for server identity, remote transports, protocol compatibility, and safe routing without guessing endpoints.

Check name

MCP Server Card

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

MCP

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish an MCP Server Card that helps agents discover remote MCP server transports before opening a session.

Result

MCP Server Card has a validation warning at "Discover MCP server card".

Validation steps

  1. Discover MCP server card

    No MCP server card was found at current, transitional, or linked discovery paths.

Evidence log1 step · 14 lines
Discover MCP server card [warning]! No MCP server card was found at current, transitional, or linked discovery paths.INFODiscover MCP server card candidateCount=5INFOBuild MCP server-card candidate list currentPath="/.well-known/mcp-server-card" transitionalPaths=["/.well-known/mcp/server-card.json","/.well-known/mcp/server-cards.json","/mcp.json","/.well-known/mcp.json"] linkedPaths=[]PASSCheck whether page claims MCP support actual=false expected="true only when HTML or Link headers mention MCP" textMatches=[] headerLinkCount=0INFOTrying to fetch /.well-known/mcp-server-card url="https://plaid.com/.well-known/mcp-server-card" source="current"FAIL/.well-known/mcp-server-card did not return a usable server card statusCode=404 contentType="text/html"INFOTrying to fetch /.well-known/mcp/server-card.json url="https://plaid.com/.well-known/mcp/server-card.json" source="transitional"FAIL/.well-known/mcp/server-card.json did not return a usable server card statusCode=404 contentType="text/html"INFOTrying to fetch /.well-known/mcp/server-cards.json url="https://plaid.com/.well-known/mcp/server-cards.json" source="transitional"FAIL/.well-known/mcp/server-cards.json did not return a usable server card statusCode=404 contentType="text/html"INFOTrying to fetch /mcp.json url="https://plaid.com/mcp.json" source="transitional"FAIL/mcp.json did not return a usable server card statusCode=404 contentType="text/html"INFOTrying to fetch /.well-known/mcp.json url="https://plaid.com/.well-known/mcp.json" source="transitional"FAIL/.well-known/mcp.json did not return a usable server card statusCode=404 contentType="text/html"WARNNo MCP server card was found reason="No MCP server card was found at current, transitional, or linked discovery paths."

Agent Ease of UseMCPEmerging recommendation

WebMCP

WebMCP has a validation warning at "Probe WebMCP operability".

25 Warning

Needs attention

WebMCP

Warning
01

Issue

No WebMCP surface was found to probe.

Details

02

Why it matters

WebMCP gives agents structured page and browser tool hints so they can understand actions without relying only on screen scraping.

Check name

WebMCP

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

MCP

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Expose browser/page WebMCP tools and compatible static WebMCP metadata when a site wants agents to understand in-page actions.

Result

WebMCP has a validation warning at "Probe WebMCP operability".

Validation steps

  1. Detect WebMCP runtime API

    Expose current WebMCP tools through document.modelContext.registerTool(), or clearly document navigator.modelContext as a compatibility/polyfill profile.

  2. Probe WebMCP operability

    No WebMCP surface was found to probe.

    WebMCP operability findings
    • No WebMCP surface was found to probe.
    • Conventional WebMCP manifest paths were checked but did not return a valid manifest.
  3. Validate declarative WebMCP form tools

    No W3C-style declarative WebMCP form attributes were found.

  4. Validate MCP-aware HTML annotations

    No data-mcp-tool or hyphenated WebMCP compatibility annotations were found.

  5. Validate static WebMCP JSON compatibility

    No static WebMCP JSON manifest or WMCP interaction graph was found.

  6. Validate WebMCP tool metadata quality

    Use clear tool names, useful descriptions, constrained schemas, side-effect clarity, and profile-appropriate naming.

  7. Review WebMCP security and policy signals

    Remove secrets and prompt-injection text from WebMCP metadata, avoid private endpoints, and use Permissions-Policy and annotations for tool safety.

Evidence log7 steps · 32 lines
Detect WebMCP runtime API [informational]INFODetect WebMCP runtime API status="informational"INFOProbe rendered browser for WebMCP runtime objects SKIPCheck current W3C runtime API actual="not detected" expected="document.modelContext/registerTool available"INFOWebMCP evidence was recorded for context. status="informational"Probe WebMCP operability [warning]! No WebMCP surface was found to probe.INFOProbe WebMCP operability status="warning"INFORun safe WebMCP operability checks safeProbeOnly=trueWARNCheck usable WebMCP evidence actual=0 expected="at least 1 usable runtime, declarative, annotation, or static manifest signal"WARNWebMCP operability warning warning="No WebMCP surface was found to probe."WARNWebMCP operability warning warning="Conventional WebMCP manifest paths were checked but did not return a valid manifest."WARNNo WebMCP surface was found to probe.Validate declarative WebMCP form tools [informational]! No W3C-style declarative WebMCP form attributes were found.INFOValidate declarative WebMCP form tools status="informational"INFOInspect visible forms and controls for current declarative WebMCP attributes annotatedElements=0 formsWithAttributes=0 controlsWithAttributes=0SKIPValidate declarative WebMCP attribute quality actual=0 expected=0INFONo W3C-style declarative WebMCP form attributes were found. status="informational"Validate MCP-aware HTML annotations [informational]! No data-mcp-tool or hyphenated WebMCP compatibility annotations were found.INFOValidate MCP-aware HTML annotations status="informational"INFOInspect HTML for MCP compatibility annotations compatibilityAttributeCount=0 dataMcpToolCount=0 examples=[]SKIPValidate compatibility annotation quality actual=0 expected=0INFONo data-mcp-tool or hyphenated WebMCP compatibility annotations were found. status="informational"Validate static WebMCP JSON compatibility [warning]! No static WebMCP JSON manifest or WMCP interaction graph was found.INFOValidate static WebMCP JSON compatibility status="warning"INFODiscover static WebMCP manifest candidates conventionalPaths=["/.well-known/webmcp.json","/webmcp.json"] checkedCount=2 profileCounts={}INFOWebMCP manifest candidate checked source="path" path="/.well-known/webmcp.json" url="https://plaid.com/.well-known/webmcp.json" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html"INFOWebMCP manifest candidate checked source="path" path="/webmcp.json" url="https://plaid.com/webmcp.json" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html"WARNValidate discovered static WebMCP metadata actual={"validManifestCount":0,"invalidManifestCount":0,"toolCount":0,"wmcpActionCount":0} expected="at least 1 valid tools[] manifest or WMCP graph when static metadata is present"WARNNo static WebMCP JSON manifest or WMCP interaction graph was found.Validate WebMCP tool metadata quality [informational]INFOValidate WebMCP tool metadata quality status="informational"INFOInspect WebMCP tool names, descriptions, schemas, and safety hints toolCount=0SKIPCheck tool metadata findings actual={"issueCount":0,"warningCount":0} expected="0 issues and 0 warnings"INFOWebMCP evidence was recorded for context. status="informational"Review WebMCP security and policy signals [informational]INFOReview WebMCP security and policy signals status="informational"INFOInspect WebMCP security and policy signals permissionsPolicy="(missing)" failureCount=0 warningCount=0PASSCheck security findings actual={"failures":0,"warnings":0} expected="0 failures and 0 warnings"INFOWebMCP evidence was recorded for context. status="informational"

Agent Ease of UseAgent CommerceInformational

Universal Commerce Protocol

Universal Commerce Protocol has a validation warning at "Fetch UCP profile".

21 Warning

Needs attention

Universal Commerce Protocol

Warning
01

Issue

UCP-like signals were found, but /.well-known/ucp was not available.

02

Why it matters

UCP discovery lets agents identify commerce capabilities, service transports, payment handlers, and signing keys without scraping human checkout flows.

Check name

Universal Commerce Protocol

Score

79/100

Status

warning

Category

Agent Commerce

Maturity

Informational

Goal

Expose a valid Universal Commerce Protocol business profile when this origin supports agentic commerce workflows.

Result

Universal Commerce Protocol has a validation warning at "Fetch UCP profile".

Validation steps

  1. Fetch UCP profile

    UCP-like signals were found, but /.well-known/ucp was not available.

Evidence log1 step · 5 lines
Fetch UCP profile [warning]! UCP-like signals were found, but /.well-known/ucp was not available.INFOFetch UCP profile status="warning"INFOFetch /.well-known/ucp statusCode=404 contentType="text/html"WARNCheck UCP profile availability actual=false expected=trueWARNCheck JSON-compatible profile response actual=false expected=true jsonCompatible=false parsed=falseWARNUCP-like signals were found, but /.well-known/ucp was not available.

AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEstablished

AI bot rules in robots.txt

AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".

17 Fail

Needs attention

AI bot rules in robots.txt

Failed check
01

Issue

No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.

02

Why it matters

AI crawler product tokens have different meanings. Explicit robots.txt groups make training, search, and retrieval access policy auditable for compliant crawler operators.

Check name

AI bot rules in robots.txt

Score

31/100

Status

fail

Category

Bot Access Control

Maturity

Established

Goal

Declare deliberate robots.txt rules for major AI training, AI search, user-triggered, and dataset crawlers.

Result

AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".

Validation steps

  1. Classify AI crawler rules

    No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.

Evidence log1 step · 6 lines
Classify AI crawler rules [fail]! No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.INFOClassify AI crawler rulesINFOParsing User-agent groups and Allow/Disallow records for known AI crawler tokens evaluatedPath="/"INFOEvaluating exact User-agent matches before wildcard fallback exactAiPolicyCount=0 totalCrawlerTokens=18FAILNo explicit AI crawler User-agent groups were found examplesExpected=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ClaudeBot","Google-Extended","CCBot"]FAILCompare explicit AI crawler coverage actual=0 expected="> 0 explicit non-search AI crawler policies" missingTokens=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ChatGPT-User","ClaudeBot","Claude-SearchBot","Claude-User","Google-Extended","Applebot-Extended","Amazonbot","Amzn-SearchBot","Amzn-User","PerplexityBot"]INFOResolved effective root-path policy for crawler tokens blocked=0 allowed=21 unspecified=0

AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished

Organization / WebSite schema

Organization / WebSite schema is missing or incomplete.

17 Fail

Needs attention

Organization / WebSite schema

Failed check
01

Issue

No Organization or Organization subtype was found in Schema.org structured data. No WebSite entity was found in Schema.org structured data. Missing identity field(s): Organization.name, Organization.url, WebSite.name, WebSite.url. WebSite.publisher is missing. Organization schema is missing logo and sameAs or public contact evidence.

02

Why it matters

Organization and WebSite schema help agents identify the publisher, canonical site identity, logo, and related profiles for attribution.

Check name

Organization / WebSite schema

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Category

Content Readiness

Maturity

Established

Goal

Identify the site owner and website entity in structured data.

Result

Organization / WebSite schema is missing or incomplete.

Validation steps

  1. Organization entity

    No Organization or Organization subtype was found in Schema.org structured data.

  2. WebSite entity

    No WebSite entity was found in Schema.org structured data.

  3. Identity fields

    Missing identity field(s): Organization.name, Organization.url, WebSite.name, WebSite.url.

  4. WebSite publisher linkage

    WebSite.publisher is missing.

  5. Organization trust fields

    Organization schema is missing logo and sameAs or public contact evidence.

Evidence log5 steps · 23 lines
Organization entity [fail]! No Organization or Organization subtype was found in Schema.org structured data.INFOOrganization entityINFOLooking for Organization or Organization subtype in structured data observedTypes=[]FAILCheck Organization entity presence actual=false expected=true fields=[{"name":"Organization.@type","present":false},{"name":"Organization.@id","present":false},{"name":"Organization.name","present":false},{"name":"Organization.url","present":false},{"name":"Organization.logo","present":false},{"name":"Organization.sameAs","present":false}]FAILOrganization entity is missingWebSite entity [fail]! No WebSite entity was found in Schema.org structured data.INFOWebSite entityINFOLooking for WebSite entity in structured data FAILCheck WebSite entity presence actual=false expected=true fields=[{"name":"WebSite.@type","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.@id","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.name","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.url","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.publisher.@id","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.publisher.name","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.publisher.url","present":false}]FAILWebSite entity is missingIdentity fields [fail]! Missing identity field(s): Organization.name, Organization.url, WebSite.name, WebSite.url.INFOIdentity fieldsINFOChecking Organization and WebSite name/url fields FAILCheck required identity fields actual=0 expected=4 missing=["Organization.name","Organization.url","WebSite.name","WebSite.url"] organizationFields=[{"name":"Organization.@type","present":false},{"name":"Organization.@id","present":false},{"name":"Organization.name","present":false},{"name":"Organization.url","present":false},{"name":"Organization.logo","present":false},{"name":"Organization.sameAs","present":false}] websiteFields=[{"name":"WebSite.@type","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.@id","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.name","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.url","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.publisher.@id","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.publisher.name","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.publisher.url","present":false}]WARNCheck identity URLs match scanned origin actual={"organizationUrlMatchesOrigin":false,"websiteUrlMatchesOrigin":false} expected={"organizationUrlMatchesOrigin":true,"websiteUrlMatchesOrigin":true}FAILIdentity fields are missing missing=["Organization.name","Organization.url","WebSite.name","WebSite.url"]WebSite publisher linkage [fail]! WebSite.publisher is missing.INFOWebSite publisher linkageINFOChecking whether WebSite.publisher points to the Organization entity FAILCheck publisher presence actual=false expected=true publisher={"present":false,"matchesOrganization":false} website={} organization={}FAILCheck publisher matches Organization actual=false expected=trueFAILWebSite publisher is missingOrganization trust fields [fail]! Organization schema is missing logo and sameAs or public contact evidence.INFOOrganization trust fieldsINFOChecking logo, sameAs, and public contact evidence FAILCheck logo presence actual=false expected=true fields=[{"name":"Organization.logo","present":false},{"name":"Organization.sameAs","present":false},{"name":"Organization.contactPoint","present":false},{"name":"Organization.telephone","present":false},{"name":"Organization.email","present":false},{"name":"Organization.address","present":false}]FAILCheck sameAs or contact evidence actual=0 expected=">= 1" sameAsCount=0 contactSignalCount=0 fields=[{"name":"Organization.logo","present":false},{"name":"Organization.sameAs","present":false},{"name":"Organization.contactPoint","present":false},{"name":"Organization.telephone","present":false},{"name":"Organization.email","present":false},{"name":"Organization.address","present":false}]FAILOrganization trust fields are missing

AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished

Structured data

Structured data failed at "Recognized structured data format".

17 Fail

Needs attention

Structured data

Failed check
01

Issue

No JSON-LD, Microdata, or RDFa structured data was found.

02

Why it matters

Structured data gives agents explicit entities, relationships, and page meaning that are harder to infer reliably from visual layout alone.

Check name

Structured data

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Category

Content Readiness

Maturity

Established

Goal

Expose machine-readable page entities and relationships through a recognized structured-data syntax.

Result

Structured data failed at "Recognized structured data format".

Validation steps

  1. Recognized structured data format

    No JSON-LD, Microdata, or RDFa structured data was found.

  2. Page-relevant schema family

    The page has specific visible content intent, but structured data does not include a matching primary schema family.

Evidence log2 steps · 8 lines
Recognized structured data format [fail]! No JSON-LD, Microdata, or RDFa structured data was found.INFORecognized structured data formatINFODetecting JSON-LD, Microdata, and RDFa in the page HTMLFAILCheck recognized structured-data formats found actual=0 expected="> 0" formatsFound=[]FAILNo recognized structured-data format foundPage-relevant schema family [fail]! The page has specific visible content intent, but structured data does not include a matching primary schema family.INFOPage-relevant schema familyINFOInferring specific page intent and comparing it with detected Schema.org typesFAILCheck schema types matching specific visible page intent actual=0 expected="> 0" inferredIntents=["software"] expectedTypes=["SoftwareApplication","WebApplication","MobileApplication"] matchingTypes=[] observedTypes=[]FAILNo primary schema family matches the inferred page intent expectedTypes=["SoftwareApplication","WebApplication","MobileApplication"] primaryTypes=[]

Agent Ease of UseAuthEmerging recommendation

Auth.md Agent Registration

Auth.md Agent Registration has a validation warning at "Warn when auth surface lacks Auth.md".

17 Warning

Needs attention

Auth.md Agent Registration

Warning
01

Issue

The site appears to support login, signup, account access, or credentials but does not publish /auth.md.

02

Why it matters

Human login and signup flows are often opaque to agents. Auth.md gives automated clients a stable registration contract instead of forcing them to scrape docs, automate browser forms, or guess credential flows.

Check name

Auth.md Agent Registration

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

Auth

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish Auth.md v1 metadata so agents can discover how to register, claim a user, and obtain credentials.

Result

Auth.md Agent Registration has a validation warning at "Warn when auth surface lacks Auth.md".

Validation steps

  1. Warn when auth surface lacks Auth.md

    The site appears to support login, signup, account access, or credentials but does not publish /auth.md.

Evidence log1 step · 2 lines
Warn when auth surface lacks Auth.md [warning]! The site appears to support login, signup, account access, or credentials but does not publish /auth.md.INFOWarn when auth surface lacks Auth.mdWARNThe site appears to support login, signup, account access, or credentials but does not publish /auth.md.

Agent Ease of UseAuthEstablished

OAuth / OIDC discovery

OAuth / OIDC discovery has a validation warning at "Detect OAuth/OIDC applicability".

17 Warning

Needs attention

OAuth / OIDC discovery

Warning
01

Issue

Generic authentication signals were found, but no OAuth/OIDC discovery signal was detected.

02

Why it matters

OAuth and OIDC discovery let agents and API clients find authorization, token, and key endpoints programmatically instead of scraping login pages or guessing provider setup.

Check name

OAuth / OIDC discovery

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

Auth

Maturity

Established

Goal

Publish OAuth/OIDC discovery metadata only when the site operates or advertises a real OAuth/OIDC authorization server.

Result

OAuth / OIDC discovery has a validation warning at "Detect OAuth/OIDC applicability".

Validation steps

  1. Detect OAuth/OIDC applicability

    Generic authentication signals were found, but no OAuth/OIDC discovery signal was detected.

Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Detect OAuth/OIDC applicability [warning]! Generic authentication signals were found, but no OAuth/OIDC discovery signal was detected.INFODetect OAuth/OIDC applicabilityINFOInspecting homepage, headers, and known auth/API signals for OAuth or OIDC claims applies=false signalsCount=0 genericAuthSignalsCount=4 checkedCount=2WARNCheck OAuth/OIDC applicability signal actual=false expected="true when metadata exists or OAuth/OIDC is claimed" checked=[{"path":"/.well-known/openid-configuration","statusCode":404,"contentType":"text/html","length":212626},{"path":"/.well-known/oauth-authorization-server","statusCode":404,"contentType":"text/html","length":212626}]WARNDetect OAuth/OIDC applicability completed with warnings issue="Generic authentication signals were found, but no OAuth/OIDC discovery signal was detected."

Agent Ease of UseAuthEmerging recommendation

OAuth Protected Resource

OAuth Protected Resource has a validation warning at "Detect protected-resource applicability".

17 Warning

Needs attention

OAuth Protected Resource

Warning
01

Issue

Generic authentication signals were found, but no OAuth Protected Resource metadata signal was detected.

02

Why it matters

Protected-resource metadata tells agents which API/resource is locked, which authorization servers can issue tokens for it, and how a 401 challenge maps back to the correct resource.

Check name

OAuth Protected Resource

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

Auth

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish OAuth Protected Resource Metadata for OAuth-protected APIs and MCP resources so clients can identify the resource and its authorization servers.

Result

OAuth Protected Resource has a validation warning at "Detect protected-resource applicability".

Validation steps

  1. Detect protected-resource applicability

    Generic authentication signals were found, but no OAuth Protected Resource metadata signal was detected.

Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Detect protected-resource applicability [warning]! Generic authentication signals were found, but no OAuth Protected Resource metadata signal was detected.INFODetect protected-resource applicabilityINFOInspecting auth headers, MCP/OAuth claims, and protected-resource hints applies=false requiresAuthorizationServers=false signalsCount=0 genericAuthSignalsCount=4 checkedCount=2WARNCheck protected-resource metadata applicability actual=false expected="true when RFC 9728 metadata exists or support is claimed" checked=[{"url":"https://plaid.com/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource","path":"/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource","source":"root-well-known","resourceIdentifier":"https://plaid.com","statusCode":404,"contentType":"text/html","length":212626},{"url":"https://plaid.com/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource/products/identity-verification/","path":"/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource/products/identity-verification/","source":"final-url-path","resourceIdentifier":"https://plaid.com/products/identity-verification/","statusCode":404,"contentType":"text/html","length":212626}]WARNDetect protected-resource applicability completed with warnings issue="Generic authentication signals were found, but no OAuth Protected Resource metadata signal was detected."

Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished

Referrer-Policy

Referrer-Policy failed at "Find Referrer-Policy header".

13 Fail

Needs attention

Referrer-Policy

Failed check
01

Issue

Referrer-Policy header is missing.

02

Why it matters

Referrer-Policy controls how much URL context is sent to other origins, limiting accidental leakage of paths, queries, and identifiers.

Check name

Referrer-Policy

Score

33/100

Status

fail

Category

Security & Trust

Maturity

Established

Goal

Limit how much referrer data leaves the site with an explicit Referrer-Policy header.

Result

Referrer-Policy failed at "Find Referrer-Policy header".

Validation steps

  1. Find Referrer-Policy header

    Referrer-Policy header is missing.

  2. Review observed browser responses

    One or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit Referrer-Policy.

Evidence log2 steps · 8 lines
Find Referrer-Policy header [fail]! Referrer-Policy header is missing.INFOFind Referrer-Policy headerINFORead Referrer-Policy delivery header="referrer-policy" value="missing" metaReferrerPolicyCount=0 browserDefault="strict-origin-when-cross-origin"FAILRequire explicit HTTP Referrer-Policy header actual="missing" expected="HTTP response header present" issue="Referrer-Policy header is missing."FAILReferrer-Policy header is missing.Review observed browser responses [warning]! One or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit Referrer-Policy.INFOReview observed browser responsesINFOSample Chrome-observed same-origin responses observedResponseCount=67 sameOriginCount=49 htmlDocumentCount=1WARNCompare observed Referrer-Policy coverage actual={"missingPolicyCount":1,"unsafeOrInvalidPolicyCount":0,"weakPolicyCount":0,"affected":[{"url":"https://plaid.com/products/identity-verification/","status":200,"resourceType":"document","contentType":"text/html","referrerPolicy":null,"classification":"invalid"}]} expected="0 missing, unsafe, invalid, or weak same-origin HTML responses" issue="One or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit Referrer-Policy."WARNOne or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit Referrer-Policy.

Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation

A2A Agent Card

A2A Agent Card has a validation warning at "Discover A2A Agent Card".

13 Warning

Needs attention

A2A Agent Card

Warning
01

Issue

No A2A Agent Card was found at the current, legacy, or fallback discovery paths.

02

Why it matters

A2A Agent Cards provide protocol-specific discovery for agent identity, skills, input and output modes, transport bindings, capabilities, and security requirements. Legacy A2A also used /.well-known/agent.json, so scanners must classify the card shape before reporting readiness.

Check name

A2A Agent Card

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

Skill Discovery

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish a version-appropriate A2A Agent Card so A2A-compatible clients can discover agent skills and invoke the declared endpoint safely.

Result

A2A Agent Card has a validation warning at "Discover A2A Agent Card".

Validation steps

  1. Discover A2A Agent Card

    No A2A Agent Card was found at the current, legacy, or fallback discovery paths.

Evidence log1 step · 8 lines
Discover A2A Agent Card [warning]! No A2A Agent Card was found at the current, legacy, or fallback discovery paths.INFODiscover A2A Agent CardINFOTry A2A discovery paths in priority order paths=["/.well-known/agent-card.json","/.well-known/agent.json","/agent-card.json","/.well-known/a2a/agent-card.json"]WARNA2A candidate path did not return a usable card path="/.well-known/agent-card.json" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html"WARNA2A candidate path did not return a usable card path="/.well-known/agent.json" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html"WARNA2A candidate path did not return a usable card path="/agent-card.json" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html"WARNA2A candidate path did not return a usable card path="/.well-known/a2a/agent-card.json" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html"WARNNo A2A Agent Card candidate was selectedWARNNo A2A Agent Card was found at the current, legacy, or fallback discovery paths.

Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation

Agent Skills index

Agent Skills index has a validation warning at "Discover Agent Skills index".

13 Warning

Needs attention

Agent Skills index

Warning
01

Issue

No Agent Skills discovery index was found at the canonical or legacy path.

02

Why it matters

An Agent Skills index lets agents discover task-specific instructions through a small trusted index, then verify and load only the skill artifacts they need.

Check name

Agent Skills index

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

Skill Discovery

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish an Agent Skills discovery index that advertises digest-pinned SKILL.md or archive artifacts.

Result

Agent Skills index has a validation warning at "Discover Agent Skills index".

Validation steps

  1. Discover Agent Skills index

    No Agent Skills discovery index was found at the canonical or legacy path.

Evidence log1 step · 5 lines
Discover Agent Skills index [warning]! No Agent Skills discovery index was found at the canonical or legacy path.INFODiscover Agent Skills indexINFOTry Agent Skills index paths in priority order paths=["/.well-known/agent-skills/index.json","/.well-known/skills/index.json"]WARNAgent Skills index candidate was not usable path="/.well-known/agent-skills/index.json" url="https://plaid.com/.well-known/agent-skills/index.json" statusCode=404WARNAgent Skills index candidate was not usable path="/.well-known/skills/index.json" url="https://plaid.com/.well-known/skills/index.json" statusCode=404WARNNo Agent Skills discovery index was found at the canonical or legacy path.

Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation

agents.json

agents.json has a validation warning at "Discover agents.json".

13 Warning

Needs attention

agents.json

Warning
01

Issue

No Wildcard-style agents.json file was found.

02

Why it matters

Wildcard agents.json gives agents workflow-level context beyond plain OpenAPI, including flows, links, examples, and API action structure. It is an emerging OpenAPI-adjacent proposal, so scanners should validate the contract shape without treating it as an A2A or IETF standard.

Check name

agents.json

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

Skill Discovery

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish a Wildcard-style agents.json file so agents can discover OpenAPI-backed workflows, links, examples, and authentication requirements.

Result

agents.json has a validation warning at "Discover agents.json".

Validation steps

  1. Discover agents.json

    No Wildcard-style agents.json file was found.

Evidence log1 step · 6 lines
Discover agents.json [warning]! No Wildcard-style agents.json file was found.INFODiscover agents.jsonINFOTry agents.json discovery paths in priority order paths=["/.well-known/agents.json","/agents.json"]WARNagents.json candidate path did not return a usable contract path="/.well-known/agents.json" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html"WARNagents.json candidate path did not return a usable contract path="/agents.json" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html"WARNNo agents.json candidate was selectedWARNNo Wildcard-style agents.json file was found.

AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlInformational

Content Signal

Content Signal has a validation warning at "Validate declared usage preferences".

13 Warning

Needs attention

Content Signal

Warning
01

Issue

No Content-Usage or Content-Signal declarations were found.

02

Why it matters

Content usage preference signals communicate intended downstream AI use separately from robots.txt crawl permission. They can express training and search preferences for compliant systems without replacing access-control rules.

Check name

Content Signal

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

Bot Access Control

Maturity

Informational

Goal

Declare AI content usage preferences when the site intentionally publishes machine-readable usage policy.

Result

Content Signal has a validation warning at "Validate declared usage preferences".

Validation steps

  1. Validate declared usage preferences

    No Content-Usage or Content-Signal declarations were found.

Evidence log1 step · 5 lines
Validate declared usage preferences [warning]! No Content-Usage or Content-Signal declarations were found.INFOValidate declared usage preferencesINFOParsing declared preferences into terms and values recordCount=0SKIPSkipping declaration validation because no Content-Usage or Content-Signal records were declared.SKIPCompare declared records to validation requirement actual=0 expected="No validation needed when no records are declared"WARNNo Content-Usage or Content-Signal declarations were present.

Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation

DNS-AID Agent Discovery

DNS-AID Agent Discovery has a validation warning at "Query DNS-AID records".

13 Warning

Needs attention

DNS-AID Agent Discovery

Warning
01

Issue

No DNS-AID HTTPS/SVCB records were found under _agents.

02

Why it matters

DNS-AID lets agents discover index, A2A, and other agent entrypoints before fetching HTTP metadata. HTTPS/SVCB records provide the service-binding substrate, while DNSSEC can authenticate the discovery answer when available.

Check name

DNS-AID Agent Discovery

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

Skill Discovery

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish DNS-AID HTTPS/SVCB records under _agents for DNS-based agent entrypoint discovery.

Result

DNS-AID Agent Discovery has a validation warning at "Query DNS-AID records".

Validation steps

  1. Query DNS-AID records

    No DNS-AID HTTPS/SVCB records were found under _agents.

  2. Check DNSSEC authentication evidence

    DNSSEC authentication evidence was not visible for the DNS-AID labels or hostname.

Evidence log2 steps · 23 lines
Query DNS-AID records [warning]! No DNS-AID HTTPS/SVCB records were found under _agents.INFOQuery DNS-AID recordsINFOBuild DNS-AID query names from hostname hostname="plaid.com" labels=["_index._agents.plaid.com","_a2a._agents.plaid.com"] claimedOnPage=falseWARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_index._agents.plaid.com" rrtype="HTTPS" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" rcode=3 ad=false answerCount=0WARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_index._agents.plaid.com" rrtype="SVCB" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" rcode=3 ad=false answerCount=0WARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_index._agents.plaid.com" rrtype="ANY" resolver="node-resolveAny-fallback" answerCount=0 error="queryAny ETIMEOUT _index._agents.plaid.com"WARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_a2a._agents.plaid.com" rrtype="HTTPS" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" rcode=3 ad=false answerCount=0WARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_a2a._agents.plaid.com" rrtype="SVCB" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" rcode=3 ad=false answerCount=0WARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_a2a._agents.plaid.com" rrtype="ANY" resolver="node-resolveAny-fallback" answerCount=0 error="queryAny ETIMEOUT _a2a._agents.plaid.com"WARNCompare total DNS-AID answer count actual=0 expected="> 0"WARNNo DNS-AID HTTPS/SVCB records were found under _agents.Check DNSSEC authentication evidence [warning]! DNSSEC authentication evidence was not visible for the DNS-AID labels or hostname.INFOCheck DNSSEC authentication evidenceWARNCompare DNSSEC authenticated-data flag actual=false expected=trueWARNCompare visible DNSSEC material actual=false expected=trueWARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_index._agents.plaid.com" rrtype="HTTPS" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_index._agents.plaid.com" rrtype="SVCB" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_index._agents.plaid.com" rrtype="ANY" resolver="node-resolveAny-fallback" dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_a2a._agents.plaid.com" rrtype="HTTPS" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_a2a._agents.plaid.com" rrtype="SVCB" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_a2a._agents.plaid.com" rrtype="ANY" resolver="node-resolveAny-fallback" dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_index._agents.plaid.com" rrtype="DNSKEY" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_a2a._agents.plaid.com" rrtype="DNSKEY" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="plaid.com" rrtype="DNSKEY" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNDNSSEC authentication evidence was not visible for the DNS-AID labels or hostname.

AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEmerging recommendation

RSL license signal

No RSL declarations were found.

13 Warning

Needs attention

RSL license signal

Warning
01

Issue

No RSL declarations were found.

02

Why it matters

Really Simple Licensing is an emerging rights-expression layer for communicating content usage and licensing terms separately from robots.txt crawl permission.

Check name

RSL license signal

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

Bot Access Control

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Declare machine-readable content licensing terms for compliant AI and crawler systems when the site needs them.

Result

No RSL declarations were found.

Validation steps

  1. Discover RSL declarations

    No RSL declarations were found.

Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Discover RSL declarations [warning]! No RSL declarations were found.INFODiscover RSL declarationsINFOChecking robots.txt License records, HTTP Link rel=license headers, HTML license links, and inline RSL XML robotsFound=trueSKIPCount discovered RSL declarations actual=0 expected=">= 1 when RSL licensing terms are published" sources={}WARNNo RSL declarations were found on any supported discovery surface.

AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEmerging recommendation

TDMRep declaration

No TDMRep declaration was found.

13 Warning

Needs attention

TDMRep declaration

Warning
01

Issue

No TDMRep declaration was found at /.well-known/tdmrep.json.

02

Why it matters

TDMRep is a W3C Community Group protocol and IANA-registered well-known URI for declaring text and data mining reservation policy on applicable content.

Check name

TDMRep declaration

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

Bot Access Control

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish a machine-readable text and data mining reservation declaration and verifiable ODRL policy when the site needs one.

Result

No TDMRep declaration was found.

Validation steps

  1. Fetch /.well-known/tdmrep.json

    No TDMRep declaration was found at /.well-known/tdmrep.json.

Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Fetch /.well-known/tdmrep.json [warning]! No TDMRep declaration was found at /.well-known/tdmrep.json.INFOFetch /.well-known/tdmrep.jsonINFORequesting origin-level TDMRep declaration at /.well-known/tdmrep.jsonWARNCompare TDMRep file response actual=404 expected="2xx with JSON array when origin-level TDMRep is published" contentType="text/html" length=212626WARNNo TDMRep declaration was found at /.well-known/tdmrep.json. 

Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished

Content-Security-Policy

Content-Security-Policy failed at "Find enforcing CSP delivery".

12 Fail

Needs attention

Content-Security-Policy

Failed check
01

Issue

Applicable HTML response is missing an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.

02

Why it matters

Content Security Policy reduces the impact of injection bugs by limiting where scripts, styles, frames, forms, and other browser resources can load or execute.

Check name

Content-Security-Policy

Score

40/100

Status

fail

Category

Security & Trust

Maturity

Established

Goal

Constrain browser resource loading and script execution with an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.

Result

Content-Security-Policy failed at "Find enforcing CSP delivery".

Validation steps

  1. Find enforcing CSP delivery

    Applicable HTML response is missing an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.

Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Find enforcing CSP delivery [fail]! Applicable HTML response is missing an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.INFOFind enforcing CSP deliveryINFORead CSP delivery headers enforcingHeader="missing" reportOnlyHeader="missing" metaPolicyCount=0 legacyHeadersPresent=[]FAILRequire enforcing Content-Security-Policy header actual="missing" expected="present" issue="Applicable HTML response is missing an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header."FAILApplicable HTML response is missing an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.

Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished

Frame protection

Frame protection failed at "Validate X-Frame-Options".

11 Fail

Needs attention

Frame protection

Failed check
01

Issue

No valid X-Frame-Options fallback is present.

02

Why it matters

Frame protection blocks hostile sites from embedding pages in deceptive frames, reducing clickjacking and UI redressing risk.

Check name

Frame protection

Score

44/100

Status

fail

Category

Security & Trust

Maturity

Established

Goal

Prevent unwanted framing with an enforcing CSP frame-ancestors directive or a valid X-Frame-Options fallback.

Result

Frame protection failed at "Validate X-Frame-Options".

Validation steps

  1. Validate CSP frame-ancestors

    No enforcing CSP frame-ancestors directive is present.

  2. Validate X-Frame-Options

    No valid X-Frame-Options fallback is present.

  3. Review observed browser responses

    One or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit valid frame protection.

Evidence log3 steps · 12 lines
Validate CSP frame-ancestors [warning]! No enforcing CSP frame-ancestors directive is present.INFOValidate CSP frame-ancestorsINFORead CSP frame-ancestors signals enforcingHeaderPresent=false reportOnlyHeaderPresent=false metaFrameAncestors=false policyCount=0 duplicateDirectives=[]WARNCompare effective frame-ancestors directive actual="missing" expected="valid restrictive enforcing frame-ancestors" issue="No enforcing CSP frame-ancestors directive is present."WARNNo enforcing CSP frame-ancestors directive is present.Validate X-Frame-Options [fail]! No valid X-Frame-Options fallback is present.INFOValidate X-Frame-OptionsINFORead X-Frame-Options fallback value="missing" parsedValues=[] normalizedValues=[]FAILCompare X-Frame-Options value actual="missing" expected="DENY or SAMEORIGIN" valid=false obsoleteAllowFrom=false duplicateOrConflicting=false issue="No valid X-Frame-Options fallback is present."FAILNo valid X-Frame-Options fallback is present.Review observed browser responses [warning]! One or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit valid frame protection.INFOReview observed browser responsesINFOSample Chrome-observed same-origin responses observedResponseCount=67 sameOriginCount=49 htmlDocumentCount=1WARNCompare observed HTML frame protection actual={"missingOrInvalidFrameProtectionCount":1,"broadFrameAncestorsCount":0,"affected":[{"url":"https://plaid.com/products/identity-verification/","status":200,"resourceType":"document","contentType":"text/html","contentSecurityPolicy":null,"contentSecurityPolicyReportOnly":null}]} expected="0 missing/invalid or broad same-origin HTML responses" issue="One or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit valid frame protection."WARNOne or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit valid frame protection.

Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished

X-Content-Type-Options

X-Content-Type-Options failed at "Find X-Content-Type-Options".

9 Fail

Needs attention

X-Content-Type-Options

Failed check
01

Issue

Browser-loadable response is missing X-Content-Type-Options.

02

Why it matters

X-Content-Type-Options tells browsers to trust declared media types instead of sniffing content, reducing the risk that mislabeled files execute as active content.

Check name

X-Content-Type-Options

Score

57/100

Status

fail

Category

Security & Trust

Maturity

Established

Goal

Prevent browser MIME sniffing for browser-loadable responses with X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

Result

X-Content-Type-Options failed at "Find X-Content-Type-Options".

Validation steps

  1. Find X-Content-Type-Options

    Browser-loadable response is missing X-Content-Type-Options.

  2. Review observed browser responses

    One or more same-origin active resources observed by Chrome did not emit X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

Evidence log2 steps · 8 lines
Find X-Content-Type-Options [fail]! Browser-loadable response is missing X-Content-Type-Options.INFOFind X-Content-Type-OptionsINFORead X-Content-Type-Options header header="x-content-type-options" value="missing"FAILRequire nosniff header actual="missing" expected="present" issue="Browser-loadable response is missing X-Content-Type-Options."FAILBrowser-loadable response is missing X-Content-Type-Options.Review observed browser responses [warning]! One or more same-origin active resources observed by Chrome did not emit X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.INFOReview observed browser responsesINFOSample Chrome-observed same-origin resources observedResponseCount=67 sameOriginCount=49 eligibleCount=49WARNCompare observed nosniff coverage actual={"missingNosniffCount":49,"malformedNosniffCount":0,"activeResourceMissingNosniffCount":30,"affected":[{"url":"https://plaid.com/products/identity-verification/","status":200,"resourceType":"document","contentType":"text/html"},{"url":"https://plaid.com/assets/fonts/PlaidSans-Medium.woff2","status":200,"resourceType":"font","contentType":"font/woff2"},{"url":"https://plaid.com/assets/fonts/PlaidSans-Regular.woff2","status":200,"resourceType":"font","contentType":"font/woff2"},{"url":"https://plaid.com/assets/fonts/PlaidSans-Bold.woff2","status":200,"resourceType":"font","contentType":"font/woff2"},{"url":"https://plaid.com/assets/fonts/PlaidSans-SemiBold.woff2","status":200,"resourceType":"font","contentType":"font/woff2"},{"url":"https://plaid.com/assets/fonts/cern-bold.woff2","status":200,"resourceType":"font","contentType":"font/woff2"},{"url":"https://plaid.com/assets/fonts/cern-extrabold.woff2","status":200,"resourceType":"font","contentType":"font/woff2"},{"url":"https://plaid.com/assets/fonts/cern-italic.woff2","status":200,"resourceType":"font","contentType":"font/woff2"},{"url":"https://plaid.com/assets/fonts/cern-medium.woff2","status":200,"resourceType":"font","contentType":"font/woff2"},{"url":"https://plaid.com/assets/fonts/cern-regular.woff2","status":200,"resourceType":"font","contentType":"font/woff2"},{"url":"https://plaid.com/assets/fonts/cern-semibold.woff2","status":200,"resourceType":"font","contentType":"font/woff2"},{"url":"https://plaid.com/assets/fonts/Inconsolata-Bold.woff2","status":200,"resourceType":"font","contentType":"font/woff2"}]} expected="0 missing or malformed eligible same-origin responses" issue="One or more same-origin active resources observed by Chrome did not emit X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff."WARNOne or more same-origin active resources observed by Chrome did not emit X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished

Semantic HTML

Semantic HTML is partially implemented.

8 Warning

Needs attention

Semantic HTML

Warning
01

Issue

Semantic HTML is incomplete: invalid h1 structure (visible h1 count 2); skipped or empty headings; 5/6 applicable personal-data inputs have valid autocomplete attributes (1 missing); 1 images missing alt attributes; 11 ARIA/native semantic issues.

Details

02

Why it matters

Semantic HTML gives browsers, assistive technology, search systems, and agents reliable landmarks, headings, controls, form semantics, and image context.

Check name

Semantic HTML

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

Content Readiness

Maturity

Established

Goal

Expose readable page structure through semantic HTML and accessible controls.

Result

Semantic HTML is partially implemented.

Validation steps

  1. Heading structure

    Expected one meaningful visible h1; found 2.

  2. Form labels and autocomplete

    5/6 applicable personal-data inputs have valid autocomplete attributes (1 missing).

  3. Image text alternatives

    1 images are missing alt attributes.

  4. Native semantics and ARIA

    11 ARIA/native semantic conflicts or redundancies were found.

Evidence log4 steps · 12 lines
Heading structure [fail]! Expected one meaningful visible h1; found 2.INFOHeading structureFAILCheck heading structure evidence actual={"counts":{"h1":2,"visibleH1":2,"headings":35,"emptyHeadings":0},"meaningfulH1":false} expected="semantic HTML evidence for this step"FAILHeading structure failed issue="Expected one meaningful visible h1; found 2."Form labels and autocomplete [fail]! 5/6 applicable personal-data inputs have valid autocomplete attributes (1 missing).INFOForm labels and autocompleteFAILCheck form labels and autocomplete evidence actual={"counts":{"formControls":6,"unlabeledFormControls":0,"autocompleteInputs":6,"inputsWithAutocomplete":5,"missingAutocompleteInputs":1},"formLabelCoverage":true} expected="semantic HTML evidence for this step"FAILForm labels and autocomplete failed issue="5/6 applicable personal-data inputs have valid autocomplete attributes (1 missing)."Image text alternatives [fail]! 1 images are missing alt attributes.INFOImage text alternativesFAILCheck image text alternatives evidence actual={"counts":{"images":10,"imagesWithAlt":9,"imageAltIssues":0},"imageAltCoverage":false} expected="semantic HTML evidence for this step"FAILImage text alternatives failed issue="1 images are missing alt attributes."Native semantics and ARIA [warning]! 11 ARIA/native semantic conflicts or redundancies were found.INFONative semantics and ARIAWARNCheck native semantics and aria evidence actual={"counts":{"ariaIssues":11},"nativeSemanticIntegrity":false} expected="native HTML semantics are present and not replaced by conflicting ARIA"WARNNative semantics and ARIA has a warning issue="11 ARIA/native semantic conflicts or redundancies were found."

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

GEO: Citable passages

GEO: Citable passages scored 35/100 and needs a fix.

8 Fail

Needs attention

GEO: Citable passages

Failed check
01

Issue

No evidence-backed, citation-length explanatory paragraph was found.

Details

02

Why it matters

Generative answer systems work best with visible, self-contained, evidence-backed content, clear entities, trustworthy attribution, structured page sections, and crawler-accessible HTML. These signals improve machine understanding even though they do not guarantee AI citations.

Check name

GEO: Citable passages

Score

35/100

Status

fail

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for AI answer engines to extract, cite, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

GEO: Citable passages scored 35/100 and needs a fix.

AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished

Author attribution

Author attribution is partially implemented.

8 Warning

Needs attention

Author attribution

Warning
01

Issue

No named author or publisher identity could be extracted.

02

Why it matters

Author attribution helps agents cite content responsibly, assess source credibility, and distinguish editorial pages from anonymous marketing copy.

Check name

Author attribution

Score

55/100

Status

warning

Category

Content Readiness

Maturity

Established

Goal

Identify content authors or publishers for trust and attribution.

Result

Author attribution is partially implemented.

Validation steps

  1. Schema.org attribution

    Schema.org attribution is incomplete or relies only on publisher/fallback evidence.

  2. Author identity quality

    No named author or publisher identity could be extracted.

Evidence log2 steps · 8 lines
Schema.org attribution [warning]! Schema.org attribution is incomplete or relies only on publisher/fallback evidence.INFOSchema.org attributionINFOChecking structured data for author, creator, and publisher contributorsWARNCheck named Schema.org author count actual=0 expected="> 0" authorCount=0 publisherCount=0 namedContributors=0 authors=[] publishers=[] formats=[]WARNSchema.org attribution is incomplete or fallback-only authorCount=0 publisherCount=0 authors=[] publishers=[]Author identity quality [fail]! No named author or publisher identity could be extracted.INFOAuthor identity qualityINFOChecking contributors for stable identity signalsFAILCheck identified contributor count actual=0 expected="> 0" namedContributors=0 identifiedContributors=[] unidentifiedContributors=[]FAILNo named contributor identity could be extracted

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Answer-first passages

AEO: Answer-first passages scored 26/100 and needs a fix.

6 Fail

Needs attention

AEO: Answer-first passages

Failed check
01

Issue

27 section(s) bury or omit a concise opening answer.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Answer-first passages

Score

26/100

Status

fail

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Answer-first passages scored 26/100 and needs a fix.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

GEO: Source and trust signals

GEO: Source and trust signals scored 50/100 and needs improvement.

6 Warning

Needs attention

GEO: Source and trust signals

Warning
01

Issue

Missing source or trust signals: authorOrOwner, freshnessDate, entityLinks.

Details

02

Why it matters

Generative answer systems work best with visible, self-contained, evidence-backed content, clear entities, trustworthy attribution, structured page sections, and crawler-accessible HTML. These signals improve machine understanding even though they do not guarantee AI citations.

Check name

GEO: Source and trust signals

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for AI answer engines to extract, cite, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

GEO: Source and trust signals scored 50/100 and needs improvement.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AIO: Source and trust signals

AIO: Source and trust signals scored 50/100 and needs improvement.

5 Warning

Needs attention

AIO: Source and trust signals

Warning
01

Issue

Missing AIO trust signals: author, publisher, freshnessDate.

Details

02

Why it matters

Google AI Overviews and AI Mode depend on normal Google Search eligibility, snippet permissions, useful visible content, consistent structured data, trust signals, and page experience basics. These signals help Google understand and preview a page, but they do not guarantee selection.

Check name

AIO: Source and trust signals

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content eligible, understandable, and previewable for Google Search AI features without promising inclusion.

Result

AIO: Source and trust signals scored 50/100 and needs improvement.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Evidence and trust

AEO: Evidence and trust scored 43/100 and needs a fix.

5 Fail

Needs attention

AEO: Evidence and trust

Failed check
01

Issue

Missing answer evidence or trust signals: author, publisher, freshnessDate, sameAs.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Evidence and trust

Score

43/100

Status

fail

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Evidence and trust scored 43/100 and needs a fix.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

GEO: Structured extraction

GEO: Structured extraction scored 63/100 and needs improvement.

4 Warning

Needs attention

GEO: Structured extraction

Warning
01

Issue

Missing or weak extraction signals: clean heading hierarchy, summary or key takeaways, typed JSON-LD structured data.

Details

02

Why it matters

Generative answer systems work best with visible, self-contained, evidence-backed content, clear entities, trustworthy attribution, structured page sections, and crawler-accessible HTML. These signals improve machine understanding even though they do not guarantee AI citations.

Check name

GEO: Structured extraction

Score

63/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for AI answer engines to extract, cite, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

GEO: Structured extraction scored 63/100 and needs improvement.

AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEmerging recommendation

llms.txt

llms.txt failed at "Score llms.txt structure and usefulness".

4 Fail

Needs attention

llms.txt

Failed check
01

Issue

llms.txt includes unsafe or private links that should not be advertised to agents.

Details

02

Why it matters

llms.txt is an emerging Markdown convention for giving language-model clients curated context and links before they crawl broadly. Broken, private, or low-signal links make the file much less useful even when it exists.

Check name

llms.txt

Score

79/100

Status

fail

Category

Content Readiness

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish a concise llms.txt index that helps agents discover useful public site context.

Result

llms.txt failed at "Score llms.txt structure and usefulness".

Validation steps

  1. Score llms.txt structure and usefulness

    llms.txt includes unsafe or private links that should not be advertised to agents.

    Findings
    • 14 links point to private, internal, credentialed, or non-HTTP(S) targets.
  2. Inspect optional llms-full.txt

    Passed.

Evidence log2 steps · 10 lines
Score llms.txt structure and usefulness [fail]! llms.txt includes unsafe or private links that should not be advertised to agents.INFOScore llms.txt structure and usefulnessINFOChecking recommended summary, sections, link labels, agent-friendly links, duplicates, and unsafe targetsPASSCheck blockquote summary is present actual=true expected=truePASSCheck H2 section count actual=20 expected="> 0"PASSCheck Markdown-formatted links actual=1560 expected="> 0"FAILCheck unsafe/private link count actual=14 expected=0FAILllms.txt structure-quality validation failed reason="llms.txt includes unsafe or private links that should not be advertised to agents."Inspect optional llms-full.txt [informational]INFOInspect optional llms-full.txtINFOTrying to fetch /llms-full.txt url="https://plaid.com/llms-full.txt"SKIP/llms-full.txt is not present statusCode=404

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Question and answer structure

AEO: Question and answer structure scored 62/100 and needs improvement.

3 Warning

Needs attention

AEO: Question and answer structure

Warning
01

Issue

Heading structure issues were detected.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Question and answer structure

Score

62/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Question and answer structure scored 62/100 and needs improvement.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AIO: Visible content clarity

AIO: Visible content clarity scored 80/100 and needs improvement.

2 Warning

Needs attention

AIO: Visible content clarity

Warning
01

Issue

Expected exactly one h1, found 2. 27 section(s) may benefit from clearer answer-first openings. Heading outline issues were detected.

Details

02

Why it matters

Google AI Overviews and AI Mode depend on normal Google Search eligibility, snippet permissions, useful visible content, consistent structured data, trust signals, and page experience basics. These signals help Google understand and preview a page, but they do not guarantee selection.

Check name

AIO: Visible content clarity

Score

80/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content eligible, understandable, and previewable for Google Search AI features without promising inclusion.

Result

AIO: Visible content clarity scored 80/100 and needs improvement.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Entity and definition clarity

AEO: Entity and definition clarity scored 80/100 and needs improvement.

2 Warning

Needs attention

AEO: Entity and definition clarity

Warning
01

Issue

Expected exactly one h1, found 2.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Entity and definition clarity

Score

80/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Entity and definition clarity scored 80/100 and needs improvement.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AIO: Page experience proxy

AIO: Page experience proxy scored 85/100 and needs improvement.

2 Warning

Needs attention

AIO: Page experience proxy

Warning
01

Issue

1 image(s) are missing width/height attributes. 6 possible modal/interstitial element(s) detected.

Details

02

Why it matters

Google AI Overviews and AI Mode depend on normal Google Search eligibility, snippet permissions, useful visible content, consistent structured data, trust signals, and page experience basics. These signals help Google understand and preview a page, but they do not guarantee selection.

Check name

AIO: Page experience proxy

Score

85/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content eligible, understandable, and previewable for Google Search AI features without promising inclusion.

Result

AIO: Page experience proxy scored 85/100 and needs improvement.

AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished

Markdown negotiation

Markdown negotiation is partially implemented.

1 Warning

Needs attention

Markdown negotiation

Warning
01

Issue

A Markdown mirror was found by convention, but it is not advertised with rel=alternate or Link metadata.

02

Why it matters

Markdown representations give agents a cleaner page form while preserving normal HTML for browsers and cache-safe representation handling.

Check name

Markdown negotiation

Score

92/100

Status

warning

Category

Content Readiness

Maturity

Established

Goal

Expose a useful Markdown representation through negotiation or an explicit alternate URL.

Result

Markdown negotiation is partially implemented.

Validation steps

  1. Same-URL negotiation

    When the page URL varies by Accept, return Content-Type: text/markdown and Vary: Accept for Markdown requests.

  2. Advertised Markdown alternate

    Advertise dedicated Markdown URLs with Link: <url>; rel="alternate"; type="text/markdown" or an HTML link rel=alternate tag.

  3. Conventional .md mirror

    A conventional Markdown mirror exists, but it is not advertised as an alternate representation.

Evidence log3 steps · 9 lines
Same-URL negotiation [informational]INFOSame-URL negotiationINFOCheck negotiated Markdown response actual={"statusCode":200,"mediaType":"text/html","vary":"Accept-Encoding"} expected="HTTP 2xx text/markdown with Vary: Accept" url="https://plaid.com/products/identity-verification/" statusCode=200 mediaType="text/html" vary="Accept-Encoding"PASSSame-URL negotiation recorded for context status="informational"Advertised Markdown alternate [informational]INFOAdvertised Markdown alternateINFOCheck advertised Markdown alternate candidates actual=0 expected="> 0 when HTML advertises a Markdown alternate" advertisedUrls=[] candidateCount=0PASSAdvertised Markdown alternate recorded for context status="informational"Conventional .md mirror [warning]! A conventional Markdown mirror exists, but it is not advertised as an alternate representation.INFOConventional .md mirrorWARNCheck conventional Markdown mirror candidates actual=2 expected="> 0 when a conventional mirror is discoverable" conventionalUrls=["https://plaid.com/products/identity-verification/index.html.md","https://plaid.com/products/identity-verification.md"] candidateCount=2WARNConventional .md mirror has a warning issue="A conventional Markdown mirror exists, but it is not advertised as an alternate representation."

Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished

HSTS header

HSTS header has a validation warning at "Review preload opt-in".

1 Warning

Needs attention

HSTS header

Warning
01

Issue

preload is present; verify hstspreload.org operational requirements before submission.

02

Why it matters

HSTS tells browsers to keep using HTTPS after the first secure visit, reducing downgrade, SSL-stripping, and mixed-transport risk for repeat users.

Check name

HSTS header

Score

95/100

Status

warning

Category

Security & Trust

Maturity

Established

Goal

Require HTTPS for repeat browser visits with a valid Strict-Transport-Security policy.

Result

HSTS header has a validation warning at "Review preload opt-in".

Validation steps

  1. Review preload opt-in

    preload is present; verify hstspreload.org operational requirements before submission.

Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Review preload opt-in [warning]! preload is present; verify hstspreload.org operational requirements before submission.INFOReview preload opt-inINFOInspect preload opt-in preload=true includeSubDomains=true maxAge=63072000WARNCompare header-level preload requirements actual="eligible by header" expected="preload + includeSubDomains + max-age >= 31536000" issue="preload is present; verify hstspreload.org operational requirements before submission."WARNpreload is present; verify hstspreload.org operational requirements before submission.

AI DiscoverabilityDiscoverabilityEstablished

IndexNow key

IndexNow key is informational for this page.

Informational

Needs attention

IndexNow key

Informational
01

Issue

IndexNow key is informational for this page.

02

Why it matters

IndexNow lets sites notify participating search engines about changed URLs, but ownership verification requires a UTF-8 key file whose filename matches the key.

Check name

IndexNow key

Score

100/100

Status

informational

Category

Discoverability

Maturity

Established

Goal

Verify that IndexNow ownership key placement is detectable when the site advertises it.

Result

IndexNow key is informational for this page.

Validation steps

  1. Find advertised IndexNow key location

    No IndexNow key location was advertised in HTML, Link headers, or robots.txt.

  2. Fetch and validate IndexNow key file

    No discoverable IndexNow key file was found.

Evidence log2 steps · 10 lines
Find advertised IndexNow key location [informational]! No IndexNow key location was advertised in HTML, Link headers, or robots.txt.INFOFind advertised IndexNow key locationINFOLook for IndexNow key hints in HTML, Link headers, and robots.txt supportedHints=["robots.txt IndexNow-Key","rel=indexnow-key","meta name=indexnow-key-location"]PASSCompare advertised key location count actual=0 expected="> 0"WARNNo IndexNow key location was advertised in HTML, Link headers, or robots.txt.Fetch and validate IndexNow key file [informational]! No discoverable IndexNow key file was found.INFOFetch and validate IndexNow key fileINFOLook for IndexNow key hints in HTML, Link headers, and robots.txt supportedHints=["robots.txt IndexNow-Key","rel=indexnow-key","meta name=indexnow-key-location"]PASSCompare advertised key location count actual=0 expected="> 0"INFOFetch each advertised same-origin key file and validate filename/body matchFAILCompare valid IndexNow key file count actual=0 expected="> 0"WARNNo discoverable IndexNow key file was found.

Performance and AccessibilityAccessibilityBrowser audit

Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

100 Fail

Check name

Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Device

desktop

Category

Accessibility

Fix guidance

Visible text labels that do not match the accessible name can result in a confusing experience for screen reader users. [Learn more about accessible names](https://dequeuniversity.com/rules/axe/4.11/label-content-name-mismatch).

Evidence
{
  "description": "Visible text labels that do not match the accessible name can result in a confusing experience for screen reader users. [Learn more about accessible names](https://dequeuniversity.com/rules/axe/4.11/label-content-name-mismatch)."
}

Performance and AccessibilityBest PracticesBrowser audit

Uses deprecated APIs

100 Fail

Check name

Uses deprecated APIs

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Device

desktop

Category

Best Practices

Estimated savings

1 warning found

Fix guidance

Deprecated APIs will eventually be removed from the browser. [Learn more about deprecated APIs](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/best-practices/deprecations/).

Evidence
{
  "description": "Deprecated APIs will eventually be removed from the browser. [Learn more about deprecated APIs](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/best-practices/deprecations/).",
  "displayValue": "1 warning found"
}

Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit

Image optimization

14 Fail

Check name

Image optimization

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Device

desktop

Category

Performance

Fix guidance

Review the grouped image optimization checks and improve the failing sub-checks listed in evidence.

Evidence
{
  "checks": [
    {
      "id": "image-aspect-ratio",
      "score": 0,
      "title": "Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio"
    }
  ]
}

Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit

LCP request discovery

14 Fail

Check name

LCP request discovery

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Device

desktop

Category

Performance

Fix guidance

[Optimize LCP](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/lcp-discovery) by making the LCP image discoverable from the HTML immediately, and avoiding lazy-loading

Evidence
{
  "description": "[Optimize LCP](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/lcp-discovery) by making the LCP image discoverable from the HTML immediately, and avoiding lazy-loading"
}

Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit

Network dependency tree

14 Fail

Check name

Network dependency tree

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Device

desktop

Category

Performance

Fix guidance

[Avoid chaining critical requests](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/network-dependency-tree) by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load.

Evidence
{
  "description": "[Avoid chaining critical requests](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/network-dependency-tree) by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load."
}

Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit

Reduce unused JavaScript

14 Fail

Check name

Reduce unused JavaScript

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Device

desktop

Category

Performance

Estimated savings

Est savings of 1,400 KiB

Fix guidance

Reduce unused JavaScript and defer loading scripts until they are required to decrease bytes consumed by network activity. [Learn how to reduce unused JavaScript](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/unused-javascript/).

Evidence
{
  "description": "Reduce unused JavaScript and defer loading scripts until they are required to decrease bytes consumed by network activity. [Learn how to reduce unused JavaScript](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/unused-javascript/).",
  "displayValue": "Est savings of 1,400 KiB",
  "numericValue": 40
}

Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit

Use efficient cache lifetimes

14 Fail

Check name

Use efficient cache lifetimes

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Device

desktop

Category

Performance

Estimated savings

Est savings of 687 KiB

Fix guidance

A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page. [Learn more about caching](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/cache).

Evidence
{
  "description": "A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page. [Learn more about caching](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/cache).",
  "displayValue": "Est savings of 687 KiB"
}

Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit

Loading performance

8 Fail

Check name

Loading performance

Score

46/100

Status

fail

Device

desktop

Category

Performance

Fix guidance

Review the grouped loading performance checks and improve the failing sub-checks listed in evidence.

Evidence
{
  "checks": [
    {
      "id": "network-rtt",
      "score": 100,
      "title": "Network Round Trip Times",
      "displayValue": "30 ms",
      "numericValue": 33.092459999999996
    },
    {
      "id": "first-contentful-paint",
      "score": 100,
      "title": "First Contentful Paint",
      "displayValue": "0.5 s",
      "numericValue": 497.50180784682715
    },
    {
      "id": "speed-index",
      "score": 9,
      "title": "Speed Index",
      "displayValue": "4.1 s",
      "numericValue": 4120.199619737073
    },
    {
      "id": "largest-contentful-paint",
      "score": 54,
      "title": "Largest Contentful Paint",
      "displayValue": "2.3 s",
      "numericValue": 2255.519524745733
    },
    {
      "id": "server-response-time",
      "score": 100,
      "title": "Initial server response time was short",
      "displayValue": "Root document took 230 ms",
      "numericValue": 231
    },
    {
      "id": "total-blocking-time",
      "score": 0,
      "title": "Total Blocking Time",
      "displayValue": "4,040 ms",
      "numericValue": 4041.0000000000045
    },
    {
      "id": "max-potential-fid",
      "score": 0,
      "title": "Max Potential First Input Delay",
      "displayValue": "1,220 ms",
      "numericValue": 1224.999999999999
    },
    {
      "id": "interactive",
      "score": 3,
      "title": "Time to Interactive",
      "displayValue": "10.8 s",
      "numericValue": 10784.891186559413
    }
  ]
}

Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit

Reduce unused CSS

7 Warning

Check name

Reduce unused CSS

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Device

desktop

Category

Performance

Estimated savings

Est savings of 78 KiB

Fix guidance

Reduce unused rules from stylesheets and defer CSS not used for above-the-fold content to decrease bytes consumed by network activity. [Learn how to reduce unused CSS](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/unused-css-rules/).

Evidence
{
  "description": "Reduce unused rules from stylesheets and defer CSS not used for above-the-fold content to decrease bytes consumed by network activity. [Learn how to reduce unused CSS](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/unused-css-rules/).",
  "displayValue": "Est savings of 78 KiB",
  "numericValue": 0
}

Fix with MCP or CLI

Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.

Score history

Public scan score over time

Public reports for this website origin. Select any point or report link to open that canonical report.

2 reports
Public score history report links
Scan dateScoreReadinessReport
47/100Level 2, Agent-LimitedView report
56/100Level 3, Bot-AwareCurrent report