Export Report
OVERALL SCORE
Level 2, Agent-Limited
- AI Discoverability 22 out of 100
- Agent Ease of Use 50 out of 100
- Security & Trust 41 out of 100
- GEO, AIO and AEO 31 out of 100
- SEO 85 out of 100
- Performance and Accessibility 64 out of 100
What AI sees of your website
ERROR: The request could not be satisfied
No page metadata or readable excerpt was captured.
Next step
Turn this report into a fix workflow
18 failed checks are ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.
| Metric | Score | Status | Passed | Failed | Warning | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI Discoverability | 22 | Priority fix | 11 | 29 | 7 | View details |
| Discoverability | 7 | Priority fix | 1 | 8 | 0 | View details |
| Content Readiness | 23 | Priority fix | 10 | 16 | 3 | View details |
| Bot Access Control | 34 | Priority fix | 0 | 5 | 4 | View details |
| Agent Ease of Use | 50 | Needs work | 0 | 0 | 8 | |
| MCP | 50 | Needs work | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| Skill Discovery | 50 | Needs work | 0 | 0 | 5 | |
| GEO, AIO and AEO | 31 | Priority fix | 3 | 8 | 7 | View details |
| GEO Readiness | 23 | Priority fix | 0 | 3 | 3 | View details |
| AIO Readiness | 45 | Priority fix | 2 | 2 | 2 | View details |
| AEO Readiness | 26 | Priority fix | 1 | 3 | 2 | View details |
| SEO | 85 | Mostly ready | 8 | 2 | 0 | View details |
| SEO | 85 | Mostly ready | 8 | 2 | 0 | View details |
| Security & Trust | 41 | Priority fix | 6 | 5 | 5 | View details |
| Security & Trust | 41 | Priority fix | 6 | 5 | 5 | View details |
| Performance and Accessibility | 64 | Needs work | 16 | 5 | 3 | View details |
| Performance | 52 | Needs work | 10 | 5 | 3 | View details |
| Accessibility | 87 | Mostly ready | 6 | 0 | 0 |
Prioritized recommendations
Issues ranked by score impact
54 items need attention
AI DiscoverabilityDiscoverabilityEstablished
Link headers
Link headers failed at "Find useful Link headers".
33 Fail
AI DiscoverabilityDiscoverabilityEstablished
Link headers
Link headers failed at "Find useful Link headers".
Needs attention
Link headers
Issue
No useful agent discovery Link headers were found.
Why it matters
Link headers let automated clients discover API catalogs, documentation, and machine-readable alternates without parsing page markup first.
Check name
Link headers
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Category
Discoverability
Maturity
Established
Goal
Include Link response headers for agent discovery using RFC 8288.
Result
Link headers failed at "Find useful Link headers".
Validation steps
Find useful Link headers
No useful agent discovery Link headers were found.
Fetch same-origin Link header targets
Link headers did not expose any same-origin targets to validate.
Evidence log2 steps · 9 lines
Find useful Link headers [fail]! No useful agent discovery Link headers were found.INFOFind useful Link headersINFOParse response Link header linkCount=0FAILCompare registered agent-useful relation count actual=0 expected="> 0"FAILCompare community relation count actual=0 expected="accepted as weaker evidence"FAILNo useful agent discovery Link headers were found.Fetch same-origin Link header targets [fail]! Link headers did not expose any same-origin targets to validate.INFOFetch same-origin Link header targetsINFOFetch same-origin Link header targets and record external skipsFAILCompare same-origin Link target failures actual=1 expected=0FAILLink headers did not expose any same-origin targets to validate.
AI DiscoverabilityDiscoverabilityEstablished
robots.txt
robots.txt failed at "Fetch robots.txt".
33 Fail
AI DiscoverabilityDiscoverabilityEstablished
robots.txt
robots.txt failed at "Fetch robots.txt".
Needs attention
robots.txt
Issue
Failed to fetch /robots.txt (Status: 403).
Why it matters
robots.txt gives crawlers and agents a standard place to read crawl permissions, disallowed paths, and sitemap locations before requesting site content.
Check name
robots.txt
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Category
Discoverability
Maturity
Established
Goal
Publish /robots.txt with clear crawl rules.
Result
robots.txt failed at "Fetch robots.txt".
Validation steps
Fetch robots.txt
Failed to fetch /robots.txt (Status: 403).
Validate RFC 9309 core syntax
robots.txt was found but did not contain a valid, parseable User-agent group.
Evidence log2 steps · 9 lines
Fetch robots.txt [fail]! Failed to fetch /robots.txt (Status: 403).INFOFetch robots.txtINFORequesting /robots.txt from the site originFAILCompare HTTP response status actual=403 expected="2xx successful response" contentType="text/html"FAILFailed to fetch /robots.txt (Status: 403). statusCode=403Validate RFC 9309 core syntax [fail]! robots.txt was found but did not contain a valid, parseable User-agent group.INFOValidate RFC 9309 core syntaxINFOParsing robots.txt into User-agent groups and Allow/Disallow recordsFAILCheck User-agent group count actual=0 expected=">= 1 parseable group" parsedUserAgents=[]FAILCheck malformed lines and orphan Allow/Disallow records actual={"invalidLines":17,"orphanRecords":0} expected={"invalidLines":0,"orphanRecords":0}FAILrobots.txt contains malformed lines invalidLines=[{"raw":"<HTML><HEAD><META HTTP-EQUIV=\"Content-Type\" CONTENT=\"text/html; charset=iso-8859-1\">","line":2},{"raw":"</HEAD><BODY>","line":4},{"raw":"<H1>403 ERROR</H1>","line":5},{"raw":"<H2>The request could not be satisfied.</H2>","line":6},{"raw":"<HR noshade size=\"1px\">","line":7}]
AI DiscoverabilityDiscoverabilityEstablished
Sitemap
Sitemap failed at "Fetch a sitemap candidate".
27 Fail
AI DiscoverabilityDiscoverabilityEstablished
Sitemap
Sitemap failed at "Fetch a sitemap candidate".
Needs attention
Sitemap
Issue
No sitemap candidate returned a successful HTTP response.
Why it matters
Sitemaps help crawlers and agents discover canonical URLs, update timestamps, and deeper content that may not be obvious from homepage navigation alone.
Check name
Sitemap
Score
20/100
Status
fail
Category
Discoverability
Maturity
Established
Goal
Publish a standards-aligned sitemap or sitemap index at a discoverable URL.
Result
Sitemap failed at "Fetch a sitemap candidate".
Validation steps
Fetch a sitemap candidate
No sitemap candidate returned a successful HTTP response.
Parse sitemap
Fetched sitemap content was not a valid sitemap with absolute HTTP(S) URL entries.
Validate sitemap field quality
No valid sitemap was available for field-quality validation.
Validate URL scope
No valid sitemap was available for URL scope validation.
Evidence log4 steps · 21 lines
Fetch a sitemap candidate [fail]! No sitemap candidate returned a successful HTTP response.INFOFetch sitemap candidateINFOTrying sitemap candidates in discovery order candidateCount=4INFOTrying to fetch /sitemap.xml url="https://rewardgateway.com/sitemap.xml"FAIL/sitemap.xml did not return a successful response url="https://rewardgateway.com/sitemap.xml" statusCode=403INFOTrying to fetch /sitemap.txt url="https://rewardgateway.com/sitemap.txt"FAIL/sitemap.txt did not return a successful response url="https://rewardgateway.com/sitemap.txt" statusCode=403INFOTrying to fetch /sitemap_index.xml url="https://rewardgateway.com/sitemap_index.xml"FAIL/sitemap_index.xml did not return a successful response url="https://rewardgateway.com/sitemap_index.xml" statusCode=403INFOTrying to fetch /sitemap-index.xml url="https://rewardgateway.com/sitemap-index.xml"FAIL/sitemap-index.xml did not return a successful response url="https://rewardgateway.com/sitemap-index.xml" statusCode=403FAILNo sitemap candidate returned HTTP 2xxParse sitemap [fail]! Fetched sitemap content was not a valid sitemap with absolute HTTP(S) URL entries.INFOParse sitemapINFOInspecting fetched sitemap content url="https://rewardgateway.com/sitemap.xml" contentType="text/html" statusCode=403FAILCheck sitemap contains at least one URL entry or child sitemap entry actual=0 expected="> 0"PASSCheck loc values are absolute HTTP(S) URLs actual=0 expected=0 invalidLocs=[]FAILFetched content was not a valid sitemap format="unknown"Validate sitemap field quality [fail]! No valid sitemap was available for field-quality validation.INFOValidate sitemap field qualitySKIPSkipped field-quality checks because no valid sitemap was availableValidate URL scope [fail]! No valid sitemap was available for URL scope validation.INFOValidate URL scope origin="https://rewardgateway.com"INFOChecking listed URLs against the scanned origin hostSKIPSkipped URL-scope checks because no valid sitemap was available
Agent Ease of UseMCPEmerging recommendation
MCP Server Card
MCP Server Card has a validation warning at "Discover MCP server card".
25 Warning
Agent Ease of UseMCPEmerging recommendation
MCP Server Card
MCP Server Card has a validation warning at "Discover MCP server card".
Needs attention
MCP Server Card
Issue
No MCP server card was found at current, transitional, or linked discovery paths.
Why it matters
MCP server cards give agents a stable, public pre-connection discovery surface for server identity, remote transports, protocol compatibility, and safe routing without guessing endpoints.
Check name
MCP Server Card
Score
50/100
Status
warning
Category
MCP
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Publish an MCP Server Card that helps agents discover remote MCP server transports before opening a session.
Result
MCP Server Card has a validation warning at "Discover MCP server card".
Validation steps
Discover MCP server card
No MCP server card was found at current, transitional, or linked discovery paths.
Evidence log1 step · 14 lines
Discover MCP server card [warning]! No MCP server card was found at current, transitional, or linked discovery paths.INFODiscover MCP server card candidateCount=5INFOBuild MCP server-card candidate list currentPath="/.well-known/mcp-server-card" transitionalPaths=["/.well-known/mcp/server-card.json","/.well-known/mcp/server-cards.json","/mcp.json","/.well-known/mcp.json"] linkedPaths=[]PASSCheck whether page claims MCP support actual=false expected="true only when HTML or Link headers mention MCP" textMatches=[] headerLinkCount=0INFOTrying to fetch /.well-known/mcp-server-card url="https://rewardgateway.com/.well-known/mcp-server-card" source="current"FAIL/.well-known/mcp-server-card did not return a usable server card statusCode=403 contentType="text/html"INFOTrying to fetch /.well-known/mcp/server-card.json url="https://rewardgateway.com/.well-known/mcp/server-card.json" source="transitional"FAIL/.well-known/mcp/server-card.json did not return a usable server card statusCode=403 contentType="text/html"INFOTrying to fetch /.well-known/mcp/server-cards.json url="https://rewardgateway.com/.well-known/mcp/server-cards.json" source="transitional"FAIL/.well-known/mcp/server-cards.json did not return a usable server card statusCode=403 contentType="text/html"INFOTrying to fetch /mcp.json url="https://rewardgateway.com/mcp.json" source="transitional"FAIL/mcp.json did not return a usable server card statusCode=403 contentType="text/html"INFOTrying to fetch /.well-known/mcp.json url="https://rewardgateway.com/.well-known/mcp.json" source="transitional"FAIL/.well-known/mcp.json did not return a usable server card statusCode=403 contentType="text/html"WARNNo MCP server card was found reason="No MCP server card was found at current, transitional, or linked discovery paths."Agent Ease of UseMCPEmerging recommendation
WebMCP
WebMCP has a validation warning at "Probe WebMCP operability".
25 Warning
Agent Ease of UseMCPEmerging recommendation
WebMCP
WebMCP has a validation warning at "Probe WebMCP operability".
Needs attention
WebMCP
Issue
No WebMCP surface was found to probe.
Details
Why it matters
WebMCP gives agents structured page and browser tool hints so they can understand actions without relying only on screen scraping.
Check name
WebMCP
Score
50/100
Status
warning
Category
MCP
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Expose browser/page WebMCP tools and compatible static WebMCP metadata when a site wants agents to understand in-page actions.
Result
WebMCP has a validation warning at "Probe WebMCP operability".
Validation steps
Detect WebMCP runtime API
Expose current WebMCP tools through document.modelContext.registerTool(), or clearly document navigator.modelContext as a compatibility/polyfill profile.
Probe WebMCP operability
No WebMCP surface was found to probe.
WebMCP operability findings
- No WebMCP surface was found to probe.
Validate declarative WebMCP form tools
No W3C-style declarative WebMCP form attributes were found.
Validate MCP-aware HTML annotations
No data-mcp-tool or hyphenated WebMCP compatibility annotations were found.
Validate static WebMCP JSON compatibility
No static WebMCP JSON manifest or WMCP interaction graph was found.
Validate WebMCP tool metadata quality
Use clear tool names, useful descriptions, constrained schemas, side-effect clarity, and profile-appropriate naming.
Review WebMCP security and policy signals
Remove secrets and prompt-injection text from WebMCP metadata, avoid private endpoints, and use Permissions-Policy and annotations for tool safety.
Evidence log7 steps · 31 lines
Detect WebMCP runtime API [informational]INFODetect WebMCP runtime API status="informational"INFOProbe rendered browser for WebMCP runtime objects SKIPCheck current W3C runtime API actual="not detected" expected="document.modelContext/registerTool available"INFOWebMCP evidence was recorded for context. status="informational"Probe WebMCP operability [warning]! No WebMCP surface was found to probe.INFOProbe WebMCP operability status="warning"INFORun safe WebMCP operability checks safeProbeOnly=trueWARNCheck usable WebMCP evidence actual=0 expected="at least 1 usable runtime, declarative, annotation, or static manifest signal"WARNWebMCP operability warning warning="No WebMCP surface was found to probe."WARNNo WebMCP surface was found to probe.Validate declarative WebMCP form tools [informational]! No W3C-style declarative WebMCP form attributes were found.INFOValidate declarative WebMCP form tools status="informational"INFOInspect visible forms and controls for current declarative WebMCP attributes annotatedElements=0 formsWithAttributes=0 controlsWithAttributes=0SKIPValidate declarative WebMCP attribute quality actual=0 expected=0INFONo W3C-style declarative WebMCP form attributes were found. status="informational"Validate MCP-aware HTML annotations [informational]! No data-mcp-tool or hyphenated WebMCP compatibility annotations were found.INFOValidate MCP-aware HTML annotations status="informational"INFOInspect HTML for MCP compatibility annotations compatibilityAttributeCount=0 dataMcpToolCount=0 examples=[]SKIPValidate compatibility annotation quality actual=0 expected=0INFONo data-mcp-tool or hyphenated WebMCP compatibility annotations were found. status="informational"Validate static WebMCP JSON compatibility [warning]! No static WebMCP JSON manifest or WMCP interaction graph was found.INFOValidate static WebMCP JSON compatibility status="warning"INFODiscover static WebMCP manifest candidates conventionalPaths=["/.well-known/webmcp.json","/webmcp.json"] checkedCount=2 profileCounts={}INFOWebMCP manifest candidate checked source="path" path="/.well-known/webmcp.json" url="https://rewardgateway.com/.well-known/webmcp.json" statusCode=403 contentType="text/html"INFOWebMCP manifest candidate checked source="path" path="/webmcp.json" url="https://rewardgateway.com/webmcp.json" statusCode=403 contentType="text/html"WARNValidate discovered static WebMCP metadata actual={"validManifestCount":0,"invalidManifestCount":0,"toolCount":0,"wmcpActionCount":0} expected="at least 1 valid tools[] manifest or WMCP graph when static metadata is present"WARNNo static WebMCP JSON manifest or WMCP interaction graph was found.Validate WebMCP tool metadata quality [informational]INFOValidate WebMCP tool metadata quality status="informational"INFOInspect WebMCP tool names, descriptions, schemas, and safety hints toolCount=0SKIPCheck tool metadata findings actual={"issueCount":0,"warningCount":0} expected="0 issues and 0 warnings"INFOWebMCP evidence was recorded for context. status="informational"Review WebMCP security and policy signals [informational]INFOReview WebMCP security and policy signals status="informational"INFOInspect WebMCP security and policy signals permissionsPolicy="(missing)" failureCount=0 warningCount=0PASSCheck security findings actual={"failures":0,"warnings":0} expected="0 failures and 0 warnings"INFOWebMCP evidence was recorded for context. status="informational"
AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEstablished
AI bot rules in robots.txt
AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Fetch robots.txt".
20 Fail
AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEstablished
AI bot rules in robots.txt
AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Fetch robots.txt".
Needs attention
AI bot rules in robots.txt
Issue
No robots.txt content was available to inspect for AI bot rules.
Why it matters
AI crawler product tokens have different meanings. Explicit robots.txt groups make training, search, and retrieval access policy auditable for compliant crawler operators.
Check name
AI bot rules in robots.txt
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Category
Bot Access Control
Maturity
Established
Goal
Declare deliberate robots.txt rules for major AI training, AI search, user-triggered, and dataset crawlers.
Result
AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Fetch robots.txt".
Validation steps
Fetch robots.txt
No robots.txt content was available to inspect for AI bot rules.
Classify AI crawler rules
No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.
Evidence log2 steps · 10 lines
Fetch robots.txt [fail]! No robots.txt content was available to inspect for AI bot rules.INFOFetch robots.txtINFORequesting /robots.txt from the site originFAILCheck whether robots.txt content is available actual="no content" expected="content returned" length=0FAILNo robots.txt content was available to inspect for AI bot rules.Classify AI crawler rules [fail]! No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.INFOClassify AI crawler rulesINFOParsing User-agent groups and Allow/Disallow records for known AI crawler tokens evaluatedPath="/"INFOEvaluating exact User-agent matches before wildcard fallback exactAiPolicyCount=0 totalCrawlerTokens=18FAILNo explicit AI crawler User-agent groups were found examplesExpected=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ClaudeBot","Google-Extended","CCBot"]FAILCompare explicit AI crawler coverage actual=0 expected="> 0 explicit non-search AI crawler policies" missingTokens=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ChatGPT-User","ClaudeBot","Claude-SearchBot","Claude-User","Google-Extended","Applebot-Extended","Amazonbot","Amzn-SearchBot","Amzn-User","PerplexityBot"]INFOResolved effective root-path policy for crawler tokens blocked=0 allowed=0 unspecified=21
AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEmerging recommendation
ai.txt policy
ai.txt policy failed at "Fetch /ai.txt".
16 Fail
AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEmerging recommendation
ai.txt policy
ai.txt policy failed at "Fetch /ai.txt".
Needs attention
ai.txt policy
Issue
/ai.txt returned HTTP 403.
Why it matters
ai.txt is a fragmented emerging convention. It can communicate human-readable AI crawling, training, attribution, restriction, and contact guidance, but it is not a standard access-control mechanism and absence should not be penalized.
Check name
ai.txt policy
Score
18/100
Status
fail
Category
Bot Access Control
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Publish an advisory human-readable AI usage policy only when the site intentionally needs one.
Result
ai.txt policy failed at "Fetch /ai.txt".
Validation steps
Fetch /ai.txt
/ai.txt returned HTTP 403.
Validate transport
ai.txt appears to be an HTML page or error document rather than a plain-text policy.
Parse ai.txt policy
Transport validation failed before policy parsing could be trusted.
Validate policy content
ai.txt does not follow the AI Visibility section model; treating it as non-standard advisory text.
Evidence log4 steps · 18 lines
Fetch /ai.txt [fail]! /ai.txt returned HTTP 403.INFOFetch /ai.txtINFORequesting optional advisory policy file at /ai.txtFAILCompare /ai.txt HTTP response actual=403 expected="2xx when ai.txt is intentionally published; 404/410 means absent optional file" contentType="text/html" length=919FAIL/ai.txt returned HTTP 403. statusCode=403Validate transport [fail]! ai.txt appears to be an HTML page or error document rather than a plain-text policy.INFOValidate transportINFOChecking ai.txt media type, size, line count, and whether the response looks like plain text contentType="text/html" length=919 lineCount=20FAILCompare media type to preferred text/plain transport actual="text/html" expected="text/plain preferred; readable text required"FAILai.txt appears to be an HTML page or error document rather than a plain-text policy.Parse ai.txt policy [fail]! Transport validation failed before policy parsing could be trusted.INFOParse ai.txt policyINFODetecting ai.txt convention from bracket sections, frontmatter, headings, and ai.txt context linksINFODetected policy structure convention="unknown-text" sections=[] markdownHeadings=[]WARNCheck AI Visibility required sections actual="missing identity, permissions, restrictions" expected="identity, permissions, and restrictions" missingRecommended=["attribution","contact","content-types"]WARNTransport validation failed before policy parsing could be trusted.Validate policy content [warning]! ai.txt does not follow the AI Visibility section model; treating it as non-standard advisory text.INFOValidate policy contentINFOChecking required section content, permission/restriction language, attribution, contact details, and safety risks convention="unknown-text"INFODetected policy signals hasPermissionLanguage=false hasRestrictionLanguage=false hasTrainingLanguage=false hasAttributionLanguage=false hasContact=falseWARNCheck required and recommended section coverage actual={"missingRequired":["identity","permissions","restrictions"],"missingRecommended":["attribution","contact","content-types"]} expected={"missingRequired":[],"recommendedPresentWhenPossible":true}WARNai.txt does not follow the AI Visibility section model; treating it as non-standard advisory text.
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Content-Security-Policy
Content-Security-Policy failed at "Find enforcing CSP delivery".
16 Fail
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Content-Security-Policy
Content-Security-Policy failed at "Find enforcing CSP delivery".
Needs attention
Content-Security-Policy
Issue
Applicable HTML response is missing an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.
Why it matters
Content Security Policy reduces the impact of injection bugs by limiting where scripts, styles, frames, forms, and other browser resources can load or execute.
Check name
Content-Security-Policy
Score
20/100
Status
fail
Category
Security & Trust
Maturity
Established
Goal
Constrain browser resource loading and script execution with an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.
Result
Content-Security-Policy failed at "Find enforcing CSP delivery".
Validation steps
Validate CSP applicability
The response is an error page, so it may not represent the browser application.
Find enforcing CSP delivery
Applicable HTML response is missing an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.
Evidence log2 steps · 8 lines
Validate CSP applicability [warning]! The response is an error page, so it may not represent the browser application.INFOValidate CSP applicabilityINFOInspect scanned response finalUrl="https://rewardgateway.com/" status=403 contentType="text/html" htmlBytes=923WARNCompare response type actual="HTML document" expected="browser-rendered HTML document" reason="The response is an error page, so it may not represent the browser application."WARNThe response is an error page, so it may not represent the browser application.Find enforcing CSP delivery [fail]! Applicable HTML response is missing an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.INFOFind enforcing CSP deliveryINFORead CSP delivery headers enforcingHeader="missing" reportOnlyHeader="missing" metaPolicyCount=0 legacyHeadersPresent=[]FAILRequire enforcing Content-Security-Policy header actual="missing" expected="present" issue="Applicable HTML response is missing an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header."FAILApplicable HTML response is missing an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Content freshness signals
Content freshness signals is missing or incomplete.
14 Fail
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Content freshness signals
Content freshness signals is missing or incomplete.
Needs attention
Content freshness signals
Issue
Content freshness signals are incomplete: missing any valid freshness date in Last-Modified, Schema.org, Open Graph, Dublin Core, generic meta, or sitemap lastmod.
Details
Why it matters
Freshness signals help agents, crawlers, and search systems decide whether content is current enough to cite, summarize, cache, or compare against newer sources.
Check name
Content freshness signals
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Category
Content Readiness
Maturity
Established
Goal
Expose modified and published dates for freshness-aware retrieval, citation, and ranking.
Result
Content freshness signals is missing or incomplete.
Validation steps
Validate Last-Modified header
No valid Last-Modified HTTP header was found.
Validate structured freshness dates
No Schema.org freshness dates were found.
Validate metadata freshness dates
No Open Graph, Dublin Core, or generic meta freshness date was found.
Corroborate with sitemap lastmod
Add a sitemap entry with a valid lastmod for the canonical page URL when sitemap corroboration is useful.
Evidence log4 steps · 16 lines
Validate Last-Modified header [fail]! No valid Last-Modified HTTP header was found.INFOValidate Last-Modified headerINFOReading Last-Modified response headerFAILCheck Last-Modified header is present and parseable actual="missing" expected="valid" alternateDates=[]FAILLast-Modified header is missing or invalidValidate structured freshness dates [fail]! No Schema.org freshness dates were found.INFOValidate structured freshness datesINFOCollecting Schema.org freshness dates from JSON-LD, Microdata, and RDFaFAILCheck structured freshness date count actual=0 expected="> 0" invalidDateCount=0 formats={} alternateDates=[]FAILNo structured freshness dates foundValidate metadata freshness dates [fail]! No Open Graph, Dublin Core, or generic meta freshness date was found.INFOValidate metadata freshness datesINFOCollecting Open Graph, Dublin Core, and generic meta freshness datesFAILCheck metadata freshness date count actual=0 expected="> 0" metaDateCount=0 invalidDateCount=0 alternateDates=[]FAILNo metadata freshness dates foundCorroborate with sitemap lastmod [warning]INFOCorroborate with sitemap lastmodINFODiscovering sitemap candidates and matching the scanned page URL candidateCount=1 attempts=1WARNCheck matching sitemap lastmod actual="no match" expected="valid match when available" robotsStatusCode=403WARNNo matching sitemap lastmod found after sitemap attempts attempts=1
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEmerging recommendation
llms.txt
llms.txt failed at "Fetch root llms.txt".
14 Fail
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEmerging recommendation
llms.txt
llms.txt failed at "Fetch root llms.txt".
Needs attention
llms.txt
Issue
/llms.txt was not found or could not be fetched.
Why it matters
llms.txt is an emerging Markdown convention for giving language-model clients curated context and links before they crawl broadly. Broken, private, or low-signal links make the file much less useful even when it exists.
Check name
llms.txt
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Category
Content Readiness
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Publish a concise llms.txt index that helps agents discover useful public site context.
Result
llms.txt failed at "Fetch root llms.txt".
Validation steps
Fetch root llms.txt
/llms.txt was not found or could not be fetched.
Inspect optional llms-full.txt
Passed.
Evidence log2 steps · 7 lines
Fetch root llms.txt [fail]! /llms.txt was not found or could not be fetched.INFOFetch root llms.txt path="/llms.txt"INFOTrying to fetch /llms.txt url="https://rewardgateway.com/llms.txt"FAIL/llms.txt was not found or could not be fetched statusCode=403FAILFetch root llms.txt failed reason="/llms.txt is required for this check."Inspect optional llms-full.txt [informational]INFOInspect optional llms-full.txtINFOTrying to fetch /llms-full.txt url="https://rewardgateway.com/llms-full.txt"SKIP/llms-full.txt is not present statusCode=403
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Organization / WebSite schema
Organization / WebSite schema is missing or incomplete.
14 Fail
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Organization / WebSite schema
Organization / WebSite schema is missing or incomplete.
Needs attention
Organization / WebSite schema
Issue
No Organization or Organization subtype was found in Schema.org structured data. No WebSite entity was found in Schema.org structured data. Missing identity field(s): Organization.name, Organization.url, WebSite.name, WebSite.url. WebSite.publisher is missing. Organization schema is missing logo and sameAs or public contact evidence.
Why it matters
Organization and WebSite schema help agents identify the publisher, canonical site identity, logo, and related profiles for attribution.
Check name
Organization / WebSite schema
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Category
Content Readiness
Maturity
Established
Goal
Identify the site owner and website entity in structured data.
Result
Organization / WebSite schema is missing or incomplete.
Validation steps
Organization entity
No Organization or Organization subtype was found in Schema.org structured data.
WebSite entity
No WebSite entity was found in Schema.org structured data.
Identity fields
Missing identity field(s): Organization.name, Organization.url, WebSite.name, WebSite.url.
WebSite publisher linkage
WebSite.publisher is missing.
Organization trust fields
Organization schema is missing logo and sameAs or public contact evidence.
Evidence log5 steps · 23 lines
Organization entity [fail]! No Organization or Organization subtype was found in Schema.org structured data.INFOOrganization entityINFOLooking for Organization or Organization subtype in structured data observedTypes=[]FAILCheck Organization entity presence actual=false expected=true fields=[{"name":"Organization.@type","present":false},{"name":"Organization.@id","present":false},{"name":"Organization.name","present":false},{"name":"Organization.url","present":false},{"name":"Organization.logo","present":false},{"name":"Organization.sameAs","present":false}]FAILOrganization entity is missingWebSite entity [fail]! No WebSite entity was found in Schema.org structured data.INFOWebSite entityINFOLooking for WebSite entity in structured data FAILCheck WebSite entity presence actual=false expected=true fields=[{"name":"WebSite.@type","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.@id","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.name","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.url","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.publisher.@id","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.publisher.name","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.publisher.url","present":false}]FAILWebSite entity is missingIdentity fields [fail]! Missing identity field(s): Organization.name, Organization.url, WebSite.name, WebSite.url.INFOIdentity fieldsINFOChecking Organization and WebSite name/url fields FAILCheck required identity fields actual=0 expected=4 missing=["Organization.name","Organization.url","WebSite.name","WebSite.url"] organizationFields=[{"name":"Organization.@type","present":false},{"name":"Organization.@id","present":false},{"name":"Organization.name","present":false},{"name":"Organization.url","present":false},{"name":"Organization.logo","present":false},{"name":"Organization.sameAs","present":false}] websiteFields=[{"name":"WebSite.@type","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.@id","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.name","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.url","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.publisher.@id","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.publisher.name","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.publisher.url","present":false}]WARNCheck identity URLs match scanned origin actual={"organizationUrlMatchesOrigin":false,"websiteUrlMatchesOrigin":false} expected={"organizationUrlMatchesOrigin":true,"websiteUrlMatchesOrigin":true}FAILIdentity fields are missing missing=["Organization.name","Organization.url","WebSite.name","WebSite.url"]WebSite publisher linkage [fail]! WebSite.publisher is missing.INFOWebSite publisher linkageINFOChecking whether WebSite.publisher points to the Organization entity FAILCheck publisher presence actual=false expected=true publisher={"present":false,"matchesOrganization":false} website={} organization={}FAILCheck publisher matches Organization actual=false expected=trueFAILWebSite publisher is missingOrganization trust fields [fail]! Organization schema is missing logo and sameAs or public contact evidence.INFOOrganization trust fieldsINFOChecking logo, sameAs, and public contact evidence FAILCheck logo presence actual=false expected=true fields=[{"name":"Organization.logo","present":false},{"name":"Organization.sameAs","present":false},{"name":"Organization.contactPoint","present":false},{"name":"Organization.telephone","present":false},{"name":"Organization.email","present":false},{"name":"Organization.address","present":false}]FAILCheck sameAs or contact evidence actual=0 expected=">= 1" sameAsCount=0 contactSignalCount=0 fields=[{"name":"Organization.logo","present":false},{"name":"Organization.sameAs","present":false},{"name":"Organization.contactPoint","present":false},{"name":"Organization.telephone","present":false},{"name":"Organization.email","present":false},{"name":"Organization.address","present":false}]FAILOrganization trust fields are missing
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Structured data
Structured data failed at "Recognized structured data format".
14 Fail
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Structured data
Structured data failed at "Recognized structured data format".
Needs attention
Structured data
Issue
No JSON-LD, Microdata, or RDFa structured data was found.
Why it matters
Structured data gives agents explicit entities, relationships, and page meaning that are harder to infer reliably from visual layout alone.
Check name
Structured data
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Category
Content Readiness
Maturity
Established
Goal
Expose machine-readable page entities and relationships through a recognized structured-data syntax.
Result
Structured data failed at "Recognized structured data format".
Validation steps
Recognized structured data format
No JSON-LD, Microdata, or RDFa structured data was found.
Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Recognized structured data format [fail]! No JSON-LD, Microdata, or RDFa structured data was found.INFORecognized structured data formatINFODetecting JSON-LD, Microdata, and RDFa in the page HTMLFAILCheck recognized structured-data formats found actual=0 expected="> 0" formatsFound=[]FAILNo recognized structured-data format foundSecurity & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Referrer-Policy
Referrer-Policy failed at "Find Referrer-Policy header".
13 Fail
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Referrer-Policy
Referrer-Policy failed at "Find Referrer-Policy header".
Needs attention
Referrer-Policy
Issue
Referrer-Policy header is missing.
Why it matters
Referrer-Policy controls how much URL context is sent to other origins, limiting accidental leakage of paths, queries, and identifiers.
Check name
Referrer-Policy
Score
33/100
Status
fail
Category
Security & Trust
Maturity
Established
Goal
Limit how much referrer data leaves the site with an explicit Referrer-Policy header.
Result
Referrer-Policy failed at "Find Referrer-Policy header".
Validation steps
Find Referrer-Policy header
Referrer-Policy header is missing.
Review observed browser responses
One or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit Referrer-Policy.
Evidence log2 steps · 8 lines
Find Referrer-Policy header [fail]! Referrer-Policy header is missing.INFOFind Referrer-Policy headerINFORead Referrer-Policy delivery header="referrer-policy" value="missing" metaReferrerPolicyCount=0 browserDefault="strict-origin-when-cross-origin"FAILRequire explicit HTTP Referrer-Policy header actual="missing" expected="HTTP response header present" issue="Referrer-Policy header is missing."FAILReferrer-Policy header is missing.Review observed browser responses [warning]! One or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit Referrer-Policy.INFOReview observed browser responsesINFOSample Chrome-observed same-origin responses observedResponseCount=2 sameOriginCount=1 htmlDocumentCount=1WARNCompare observed Referrer-Policy coverage actual={"missingPolicyCount":1,"unsafeOrInvalidPolicyCount":0,"weakPolicyCount":0,"affected":[{"url":"https://rewardgateway.com/","status":403,"resourceType":"document","contentType":"text/html","referrerPolicy":null,"classification":"invalid"}]} expected="0 missing, unsafe, invalid, or weak same-origin HTML responses" issue="One or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit Referrer-Policy."WARNOne or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit Referrer-Policy.
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Markdown negotiation
Markdown negotiation is missing or incomplete.
13 Fail
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Markdown negotiation
Markdown negotiation is missing or incomplete.
Needs attention
Markdown negotiation
Issue
Best candidate returned Content-Type "text/html" instead of text/markdown.
Why it matters
Markdown representations give agents a cleaner page form while preserving normal HTML for browsers and cache-safe representation handling.
Check name
Markdown negotiation
Score
10/100
Status
fail
Category
Content Readiness
Maturity
Established
Goal
Expose a useful Markdown representation through negotiation or an explicit alternate URL.
Result
Markdown negotiation is missing or incomplete.
Validation steps
Markdown representation
No usable Markdown representation was found through negotiation, advertised alternates, or conservative .md mirror checks.
Same-URL negotiation
Same-URL Accept: text/markdown did not return a valid Markdown representation.
Markdown format validation
Markdown response appears to expose MDX/JSX source rather than rendered agent-facing Markdown.
Advertised Markdown alternate
No Link or HTML rel=alternate text/markdown URL was advertised.
Conventional .md mirror
Conventional .md mirror candidates did not return valid Markdown.
Evidence log5 steps · 15 lines
Markdown representation [fail]! No usable Markdown representation was found through negotiation, advertised alternates, or conservative .md mirror checks.INFOMarkdown representationFAILCheck usable Markdown representation was selected actual={"source":"negotiated","url":"https://rewardgateway.com/","statusCode":403,"contentType":"text/html","mediaType":"text/html","vary":"","requireVaryAccept":true,"contentTypeStatus":"fail","cacheStatus":"fail","bodyStatus":"fail","pass":false,"quality":{"valid":false,"formatStatus":"fail","dialect":"mdx-like","hasHeading":false,"headingCount":0,"wordCount":124,"features":{"markdownLinks":0,"referenceLinks":0,"listItems":0,"tables":0,"taskListItems":0,"fencedCodeBlocks":0,"yamlFrontmatter":false,"jsonLdFencedBlocks":0,"admonitions":0,"strikethrough":0,"autolinks":0,"rawHtmlTags":10,"jsxOrMdxSignals":13},"issues":["missing-heading","raw-html-heavy","mdx-jsx-source-leakage","plain-text-like"],"excerpt":"<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC \"-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN\" \"http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd\">\n<HTML><HEAD><META HTTP-EQUIV=\"Content-Type\" CONTENT=\"text/html; charset=iso-8859-1\">\n<TITLE>ERROR: The request could not be satisfied</TI","issue":"Markdown response appears to expose MDX/JSX source rather than rendered agent-facing Markdown."}} expected="negotiated, advertised alternate, or conventional mirror" selected={"source":"negotiated","url":"https://rewardgateway.com/","statusCode":403,"contentType":"text/html","mediaType":"text/html","vary":"","requireVaryAccept":true,"contentTypeStatus":"fail","cacheStatus":"fail","bodyStatus":"fail","pass":false,"quality":{"valid":false,"formatStatus":"fail","dialect":"mdx-like","hasHeading":false,"headingCount":0,"wordCount":124,"features":{"markdownLinks":0,"referenceLinks":0,"listItems":0,"tables":0,"taskListItems":0,"fencedCodeBlocks":0,"yamlFrontmatter":false,"jsonLdFencedBlocks":0,"admonitions":0,"strikethrough":0,"autolinks":0,"rawHtmlTags":10,"jsxOrMdxSignals":13},"issues":["missing-heading","raw-html-heavy","mdx-jsx-source-leakage","plain-text-like"],"excerpt":"<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC \"-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN\" \"http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd\">\n<HTML><HEAD><META HTTP-EQUIV=\"Content-Type\" CONTENT=\"text/html; charset=iso-8859-1\">\n<TITLE>ERROR: The request could not be satisfied</TI","issue":"Markdown response appears to expose MDX/JSX source rather than rendered agent-facing Markdown."}} candidatesChecked=2FAILMarkdown representation failed issue="No usable Markdown representation was found through negotiation, advertised alternates, or conservative .md mirror checks."Same-URL negotiation [fail]! Same-URL Accept: text/markdown did not return a valid Markdown representation.INFOSame-URL negotiationFAILCheck negotiated Markdown response actual={"statusCode":403,"mediaType":"text/html","vary":""} expected="HTTP 2xx text/markdown with Vary: Accept" url="https://rewardgateway.com/" statusCode=403 mediaType="text/html"FAILSame-URL negotiation failed issue="Same-URL Accept: text/markdown did not return a valid Markdown representation."Markdown format validation [fail]! Markdown response appears to expose MDX/JSX source rather than rendered agent-facing Markdown.INFOMarkdown format validationFAILCheck Markdown body quality actual={"valid":false,"wordCount":124,"headingCount":0,"dialect":"mdx-like"} expected="valid Markdown with substantive text and headings" valid=false dialect="mdx-like" wordCount=124 headingCount=0FAILMarkdown format validation failed issue="Markdown response appears to expose MDX/JSX source rather than rendered agent-facing Markdown."Advertised Markdown alternate [warning]! No Link or HTML rel=alternate text/markdown URL was advertised.INFOAdvertised Markdown alternateWARNCheck advertised Markdown alternate candidates actual=0 expected="> 0 when HTML advertises a Markdown alternate" advertisedUrls=[] candidateCount=0WARNAdvertised Markdown alternate has a warning issue="No Link or HTML rel=alternate text/markdown URL was advertised."Conventional .md mirror [fail]! Conventional .md mirror candidates did not return valid Markdown.INFOConventional .md mirrorFAILCheck conventional Markdown mirror candidates actual=1 expected="> 0 when a conventional mirror is discoverable" conventionalUrls=["https://rewardgateway.com/index.html.md"] candidateCount=1FAILConventional .md mirror failed issue="Conventional .md mirror candidates did not return valid Markdown."
Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation
A2A Agent Card
A2A Agent Card has a validation warning at "Discover A2A Agent Card".
13 Warning
Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation
A2A Agent Card
A2A Agent Card has a validation warning at "Discover A2A Agent Card".
Needs attention
A2A Agent Card
Issue
No A2A Agent Card was found at the current, legacy, or fallback discovery paths.
Why it matters
A2A Agent Cards provide protocol-specific discovery for agent identity, skills, input and output modes, transport bindings, capabilities, and security requirements. Legacy A2A also used /.well-known/agent.json, so scanners must classify the card shape before reporting readiness.
Check name
A2A Agent Card
Score
50/100
Status
warning
Category
Skill Discovery
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Publish a version-appropriate A2A Agent Card so A2A-compatible clients can discover agent skills and invoke the declared endpoint safely.
Result
A2A Agent Card has a validation warning at "Discover A2A Agent Card".
Validation steps
Discover A2A Agent Card
No A2A Agent Card was found at the current, legacy, or fallback discovery paths.
Evidence log1 step · 8 lines
Discover A2A Agent Card [warning]! No A2A Agent Card was found at the current, legacy, or fallback discovery paths.INFODiscover A2A Agent CardINFOTry A2A discovery paths in priority order paths=["/.well-known/agent-card.json","/.well-known/agent.json","/agent-card.json","/.well-known/a2a/agent-card.json"]WARNA2A candidate path did not return a usable card path="/.well-known/agent-card.json" statusCode=403 contentType="text/html"WARNA2A candidate path did not return a usable card path="/.well-known/agent.json" statusCode=403 contentType="text/html"WARNA2A candidate path did not return a usable card path="/agent-card.json" statusCode=403 contentType="text/html"WARNA2A candidate path did not return a usable card path="/.well-known/a2a/agent-card.json" statusCode=403 contentType="text/html"WARNNo A2A Agent Card candidate was selectedWARNNo A2A Agent Card was found at the current, legacy, or fallback discovery paths.Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation
Agent Skills index
Agent Skills index has a validation warning at "Discover Agent Skills index".
13 Warning
Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation
Agent Skills index
Agent Skills index has a validation warning at "Discover Agent Skills index".
Needs attention
Agent Skills index
Issue
No Agent Skills discovery index was found at the canonical or legacy path.
Why it matters
An Agent Skills index lets agents discover task-specific instructions through a small trusted index, then verify and load only the skill artifacts they need.
Check name
Agent Skills index
Score
50/100
Status
warning
Category
Skill Discovery
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Publish an Agent Skills discovery index that advertises digest-pinned SKILL.md or archive artifacts.
Result
Agent Skills index has a validation warning at "Discover Agent Skills index".
Validation steps
Discover Agent Skills index
No Agent Skills discovery index was found at the canonical or legacy path.
Evidence log1 step · 5 lines
Discover Agent Skills index [warning]! No Agent Skills discovery index was found at the canonical or legacy path.INFODiscover Agent Skills indexINFOTry Agent Skills index paths in priority order paths=["/.well-known/agent-skills/index.json","/.well-known/skills/index.json"]WARNAgent Skills index candidate was not usable path="/.well-known/agent-skills/index.json" url="https://rewardgateway.com/.well-known/agent-skills/index.json" statusCode=403WARNAgent Skills index candidate was not usable path="/.well-known/skills/index.json" url="https://rewardgateway.com/.well-known/skills/index.json" statusCode=403WARNNo Agent Skills discovery index was found at the canonical or legacy path.Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation
agents.json
agents.json has a validation warning at "Discover agents.json".
13 Warning
Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation
agents.json
agents.json has a validation warning at "Discover agents.json".
Needs attention
agents.json
Issue
No Wildcard-style agents.json file was found.
Why it matters
Wildcard agents.json gives agents workflow-level context beyond plain OpenAPI, including flows, links, examples, and API action structure. It is an emerging OpenAPI-adjacent proposal, so scanners should validate the contract shape without treating it as an A2A or IETF standard.
Check name
agents.json
Score
50/100
Status
warning
Category
Skill Discovery
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Publish a Wildcard-style agents.json file so agents can discover OpenAPI-backed workflows, links, examples, and authentication requirements.
Result
agents.json has a validation warning at "Discover agents.json".
Validation steps
Discover agents.json
No Wildcard-style agents.json file was found.
Evidence log1 step · 6 lines
Discover agents.json [warning]! No Wildcard-style agents.json file was found.INFODiscover agents.jsonINFOTry agents.json discovery paths in priority order paths=["/.well-known/agents.json","/agents.json"]WARNagents.json candidate path did not return a usable contract path="/.well-known/agents.json" statusCode=403 contentType="text/html"WARNagents.json candidate path did not return a usable contract path="/agents.json" statusCode=403 contentType="text/html"WARNNo agents.json candidate was selectedWARNNo Wildcard-style agents.json file was found.Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation
DNS-AID Agent Discovery
DNS-AID Agent Discovery has a validation warning at "Query DNS-AID records".
13 Warning
Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation
DNS-AID Agent Discovery
DNS-AID Agent Discovery has a validation warning at "Query DNS-AID records".
Needs attention
DNS-AID Agent Discovery
Issue
No DNS-AID HTTPS/SVCB records were found under _agents.
Why it matters
DNS-AID lets agents discover index, A2A, and other agent entrypoints before fetching HTTP metadata. HTTPS/SVCB records provide the service-binding substrate, while DNSSEC can authenticate the discovery answer when available.
Check name
DNS-AID Agent Discovery
Score
50/100
Status
warning
Category
Skill Discovery
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Publish DNS-AID HTTPS/SVCB records under _agents for DNS-based agent entrypoint discovery.
Result
DNS-AID Agent Discovery has a validation warning at "Query DNS-AID records".
Validation steps
Query DNS-AID records
No DNS-AID HTTPS/SVCB records were found under _agents.
Check DNSSEC authentication evidence
DNSSEC authentication evidence was not visible for the DNS-AID labels or hostname.
Evidence log2 steps · 23 lines
Query DNS-AID records [warning]! No DNS-AID HTTPS/SVCB records were found under _agents.INFOQuery DNS-AID recordsINFOBuild DNS-AID query names from hostname hostname="rewardgateway.com" labels=["_index._agents.rewardgateway.com","_a2a._agents.rewardgateway.com"] claimedOnPage=falseWARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_index._agents.rewardgateway.com" rrtype="HTTPS" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" rcode=0 ad=false answerCount=0WARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_index._agents.rewardgateway.com" rrtype="SVCB" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" rcode=0 ad=false answerCount=0WARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_index._agents.rewardgateway.com" rrtype="ANY" resolver="node-resolveAny-fallback" answerCount=0 error="queryAny ETIMEOUT _index._agents.rewardgateway.com"WARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_a2a._agents.rewardgateway.com" rrtype="HTTPS" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" rcode=0 ad=false answerCount=0WARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_a2a._agents.rewardgateway.com" rrtype="SVCB" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" rcode=0 ad=false answerCount=0WARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_a2a._agents.rewardgateway.com" rrtype="ANY" resolver="node-resolveAny-fallback" answerCount=0 error="queryAny ETIMEOUT _a2a._agents.rewardgateway.com"WARNCompare total DNS-AID answer count actual=0 expected="> 0"WARNNo DNS-AID HTTPS/SVCB records were found under _agents.Check DNSSEC authentication evidence [warning]! DNSSEC authentication evidence was not visible for the DNS-AID labels or hostname.INFOCheck DNSSEC authentication evidenceWARNCompare DNSSEC authenticated-data flag actual=false expected=trueWARNCompare visible DNSSEC material actual=false expected=trueWARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_index._agents.rewardgateway.com" rrtype="HTTPS" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_index._agents.rewardgateway.com" rrtype="SVCB" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_index._agents.rewardgateway.com" rrtype="ANY" resolver="node-resolveAny-fallback" dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_a2a._agents.rewardgateway.com" rrtype="HTTPS" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_a2a._agents.rewardgateway.com" rrtype="SVCB" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_a2a._agents.rewardgateway.com" rrtype="ANY" resolver="node-resolveAny-fallback" dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_index._agents.rewardgateway.com" rrtype="DNSKEY" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_a2a._agents.rewardgateway.com" rrtype="DNSKEY" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="rewardgateway.com" rrtype="DNSKEY" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNDNSSEC authentication evidence was not visible for the DNS-AID labels or hostname.
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Frame protection
Frame protection failed at "Validate X-Frame-Options".
11 Fail
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Frame protection
Frame protection failed at "Validate X-Frame-Options".
Needs attention
Frame protection
Issue
No valid X-Frame-Options fallback is present.
Why it matters
Frame protection blocks hostile sites from embedding pages in deceptive frames, reducing clickjacking and UI redressing risk.
Check name
Frame protection
Score
44/100
Status
fail
Category
Security & Trust
Maturity
Established
Goal
Prevent unwanted framing with an enforcing CSP frame-ancestors directive or a valid X-Frame-Options fallback.
Result
Frame protection failed at "Validate X-Frame-Options".
Validation steps
Validate CSP frame-ancestors
No enforcing CSP frame-ancestors directive is present.
Validate X-Frame-Options
No valid X-Frame-Options fallback is present.
Review observed browser responses
One or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit valid frame protection.
Evidence log3 steps · 12 lines
Validate CSP frame-ancestors [warning]! No enforcing CSP frame-ancestors directive is present.INFOValidate CSP frame-ancestorsINFORead CSP frame-ancestors signals enforcingHeaderPresent=false reportOnlyHeaderPresent=false metaFrameAncestors=false policyCount=0 duplicateDirectives=[]WARNCompare effective frame-ancestors directive actual="missing" expected="valid restrictive enforcing frame-ancestors" issue="No enforcing CSP frame-ancestors directive is present."WARNNo enforcing CSP frame-ancestors directive is present.Validate X-Frame-Options [fail]! No valid X-Frame-Options fallback is present.INFOValidate X-Frame-OptionsINFORead X-Frame-Options fallback value="missing" parsedValues=[] normalizedValues=[]FAILCompare X-Frame-Options value actual="missing" expected="DENY or SAMEORIGIN" valid=false obsoleteAllowFrom=false duplicateOrConflicting=false issue="No valid X-Frame-Options fallback is present."FAILNo valid X-Frame-Options fallback is present.Review observed browser responses [warning]! One or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit valid frame protection.INFOReview observed browser responsesINFOSample Chrome-observed same-origin responses observedResponseCount=2 sameOriginCount=1 htmlDocumentCount=1WARNCompare observed HTML frame protection actual={"missingOrInvalidFrameProtectionCount":1,"broadFrameAncestorsCount":0,"affected":[{"url":"https://rewardgateway.com/","status":403,"resourceType":"document","contentType":"text/html","contentSecurityPolicy":null,"contentSecurityPolicyReportOnly":null}]} expected="0 missing/invalid or broad same-origin HTML responses" issue="One or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit valid frame protection."WARNOne or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit valid frame protection.
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
HSTS header
HSTS header failed at "Find Strict-Transport-Security".
10 Fail
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
HSTS header
HSTS header failed at "Find Strict-Transport-Security".
Needs attention
HSTS header
Issue
HTTPS response is missing Strict-Transport-Security.
Why it matters
HSTS tells browsers to keep using HTTPS after the first secure visit, reducing downgrade, SSL-stripping, and mixed-transport risk for repeat users.
Check name
HSTS header
Score
50/100
Status
fail
Category
Security & Trust
Maturity
Established
Goal
Require HTTPS for repeat browser visits with a valid Strict-Transport-Security policy.
Result
HSTS header failed at "Find Strict-Transport-Security".
Validation steps
Find Strict-Transport-Security
HTTPS response is missing Strict-Transport-Security.
Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Find Strict-Transport-Security [fail]! HTTPS response is missing Strict-Transport-Security.INFOFind Strict-Transport-SecurityINFORead Strict-Transport-Security header header="strict-transport-security" value="missing" effectiveValue=null duplicateHeaderValueCount=0FAILRequire HSTS header on HTTPS response actual="missing" expected="present" issue="HTTPS response is missing Strict-Transport-Security."FAILHTTPS response is missing Strict-Transport-Security.AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlInformational
Content Signal
Content Signal has a validation warning at "Validate declared usage preferences".
10 Warning
AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlInformational
Content Signal
Content Signal has a validation warning at "Validate declared usage preferences".
Needs attention
Content Signal
Issue
No Content-Usage or Content-Signal declarations were found.
Why it matters
Content usage preference signals communicate intended downstream AI use separately from robots.txt crawl permission. They can express training and search preferences for compliant systems without replacing access-control rules.
Check name
Content Signal
Score
50/100
Status
warning
Category
Bot Access Control
Maturity
Informational
Goal
Declare AI content usage preferences when the site intentionally publishes machine-readable usage policy.
Result
Content Signal has a validation warning at "Validate declared usage preferences".
Validation steps
Validate declared usage preferences
No Content-Usage or Content-Signal declarations were found.
Evidence log1 step · 5 lines
Validate declared usage preferences [warning]! No Content-Usage or Content-Signal declarations were found.INFOValidate declared usage preferencesINFOParsing declared preferences into terms and values recordCount=0SKIPSkipping declaration validation because no Content-Usage or Content-Signal records were declared.SKIPCompare declared records to validation requirement actual=0 expected="No validation needed when no records are declared"WARNNo Content-Usage or Content-Signal declarations were present.AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEmerging recommendation
RSL license signal
No RSL declarations were found.
10 Warning
AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEmerging recommendation
RSL license signal
No RSL declarations were found.
Needs attention
RSL license signal
Issue
No RSL declarations were found.
Why it matters
Really Simple Licensing is an emerging rights-expression layer for communicating content usage and licensing terms separately from robots.txt crawl permission.
Check name
RSL license signal
Score
50/100
Status
warning
Category
Bot Access Control
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Declare machine-readable content licensing terms for compliant AI and crawler systems when the site needs them.
Result
No RSL declarations were found.
Validation steps
Discover RSL declarations
No RSL declarations were found.
Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Discover RSL declarations [warning]! No RSL declarations were found.INFODiscover RSL declarationsINFOChecking robots.txt License records, HTTP Link rel=license headers, HTML license links, and inline RSL XML robotsFound=falseSKIPCount discovered RSL declarations actual=0 expected=">= 1 when RSL licensing terms are published" sources={}WARNNo RSL declarations were found on any supported discovery surface.AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEmerging recommendation
TDMRep declaration
No TDMRep declaration was found.
10 Warning
AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEmerging recommendation
TDMRep declaration
No TDMRep declaration was found.
Needs attention
TDMRep declaration
Issue
No TDMRep declaration was found at /.well-known/tdmrep.json.
Why it matters
TDMRep is a W3C Community Group protocol and IANA-registered well-known URI for declaring text and data mining reservation policy on applicable content.
Check name
TDMRep declaration
Score
50/100
Status
warning
Category
Bot Access Control
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Publish a machine-readable text and data mining reservation declaration and verifiable ODRL policy when the site needs one.
Result
No TDMRep declaration was found.
Validation steps
Fetch /.well-known/tdmrep.json
No TDMRep declaration was found at /.well-known/tdmrep.json.
Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Fetch /.well-known/tdmrep.json [warning]! No TDMRep declaration was found at /.well-known/tdmrep.json.INFOFetch /.well-known/tdmrep.jsonINFORequesting origin-level TDMRep declaration at /.well-known/tdmrep.jsonWARNCompare TDMRep file response actual=403 expected="2xx with JSON array when origin-level TDMRep is published" contentType="text/html" length=919WARNNo TDMRep declaration was found at /.well-known/tdmrep.json. Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options failed at "Find X-Content-Type-Options".
9 Fail
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options failed at "Find X-Content-Type-Options".
Needs attention
X-Content-Type-Options
Issue
Browser-loadable response is missing X-Content-Type-Options.
Why it matters
X-Content-Type-Options tells browsers to trust declared media types instead of sniffing content, reducing the risk that mislabeled files execute as active content.
Check name
X-Content-Type-Options
Score
57/100
Status
fail
Category
Security & Trust
Maturity
Established
Goal
Prevent browser MIME sniffing for browser-loadable responses with X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.
Result
X-Content-Type-Options failed at "Find X-Content-Type-Options".
Validation steps
Find X-Content-Type-Options
Browser-loadable response is missing X-Content-Type-Options.
Review observed browser responses
One or more same-origin browser-observed responses had missing or non-conformant nosniff headers.
Evidence log2 steps · 8 lines
Find X-Content-Type-Options [fail]! Browser-loadable response is missing X-Content-Type-Options.INFOFind X-Content-Type-OptionsINFORead X-Content-Type-Options header header="x-content-type-options" value="missing"FAILRequire nosniff header actual="missing" expected="present" issue="Browser-loadable response is missing X-Content-Type-Options."FAILBrowser-loadable response is missing X-Content-Type-Options.Review observed browser responses [warning]! One or more same-origin browser-observed responses had missing or non-conformant nosniff headers.INFOReview observed browser responsesINFOSample Chrome-observed same-origin resources observedResponseCount=2 sameOriginCount=1 eligibleCount=1WARNCompare observed nosniff coverage actual={"missingNosniffCount":1,"malformedNosniffCount":0,"activeResourceMissingNosniffCount":0,"affected":[{"url":"https://rewardgateway.com/","status":403,"resourceType":"document","contentType":"text/html"}]} expected="0 missing or malformed eligible same-origin responses" issue="One or more same-origin browser-observed responses had missing or non-conformant nosniff headers."WARNOne or more same-origin browser-observed responses had missing or non-conformant nosniff headers.
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AIO: Source and trust signals
AIO: Source and trust signals scored 0/100 and needs a fix.
8 Fail
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AIO: Source and trust signals
AIO: Source and trust signals scored 0/100 and needs a fix.
Needs attention
AIO: Source and trust signals
Issue
Missing AIO trust signals: author, publisher, freshnessDate, aboutOrContact, policyLinks, sourceLinks.
Details
Why it matters
Google AI Overviews and AI Mode depend on normal Google Search eligibility, snippet permissions, useful visible content, consistent structured data, trust signals, and page experience basics. These signals help Google understand and preview a page, but they do not guarantee selection.
Check name
AIO: Source and trust signals
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content eligible, understandable, and previewable for Google Search AI features without promising inclusion.
Result
AIO: Source and trust signals scored 0/100 and needs a fix.
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AEO: Answer-first passages
AEO: Answer-first passages scored 0/100 and needs a fix.
7 Fail
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AEO: Answer-first passages
AEO: Answer-first passages scored 0/100 and needs a fix.
Needs attention
AEO: Answer-first passages
Issue
1 section(s) bury or omit a concise opening answer. No direct definition pattern was detected.
Details
Why it matters
Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.
Check name
AEO: Answer-first passages
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.
Result
AEO: Answer-first passages scored 0/100 and needs a fix.
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AEO: Evidence and trust
AEO: Evidence and trust scored 0/100 and needs a fix.
7 Fail
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AEO: Evidence and trust
AEO: Evidence and trust scored 0/100 and needs a fix.
Needs attention
AEO: Evidence and trust
Issue
Missing answer evidence or trust signals: author, publisher, freshnessDate, sources, sameAs, aboutOrContact, policyLinks.
Details
Why it matters
Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.
Check name
AEO: Evidence and trust
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.
Result
AEO: Evidence and trust scored 0/100 and needs a fix.
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Author attribution
Author attribution is partially implemented.
6 Warning
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Author attribution
Author attribution is partially implemented.
Needs attention
Author attribution
Issue
No named author or publisher identity could be extracted.
Why it matters
Author attribution helps agents cite content responsibly, assess source credibility, and distinguish editorial pages from anonymous marketing copy.
Check name
Author attribution
Score
55/100
Status
warning
Category
Content Readiness
Maturity
Established
Goal
Identify content authors or publishers for trust and attribution.
Result
Author attribution is partially implemented.
Validation steps
Schema.org attribution
Schema.org attribution is incomplete or relies only on publisher/fallback evidence.
Author identity quality
No named author or publisher identity could be extracted.
Evidence log2 steps · 8 lines
Schema.org attribution [warning]! Schema.org attribution is incomplete or relies only on publisher/fallback evidence.INFOSchema.org attributionINFOChecking structured data for author, creator, and publisher contributorsWARNCheck named Schema.org author count actual=0 expected="> 0" authorCount=0 publisherCount=0 namedContributors=0 authors=[] publishers=[] formats=[]WARNSchema.org attribution is incomplete or fallback-only authorCount=0 publisherCount=0 authors=[] publishers=[]Author identity quality [fail]! No named author or publisher identity could be extracted.INFOAuthor identity qualityINFOChecking contributors for stable identity signalsFAILCheck identified contributor count actual=0 expected="> 0" namedContributors=0 identifiedContributors=[] unidentifiedContributors=[]FAILNo named contributor identity could be extracted
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
GEO: Source and trust signals
GEO: Source and trust signals scored 0/100 and needs a fix.
6 Fail
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
GEO: Source and trust signals
GEO: Source and trust signals scored 0/100 and needs a fix.
Needs attention
GEO: Source and trust signals
Issue
Missing source or trust signals: authorOrOwner, freshnessDate, sourceLinks, aboutOrContact, policyLinks, entityLinks.
Details
Why it matters
Generative answer systems work best with visible, self-contained, evidence-backed content, clear entities, trustworthy attribution, structured page sections, and crawler-accessible HTML. These signals improve machine understanding even though they do not guarantee AI citations.
Check name
GEO: Source and trust signals
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content easy for AI answer engines to extract, cite, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.
Result
GEO: Source and trust signals scored 0/100 and needs a fix.
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AIO: Google Search eligibility
AIO: Google Search eligibility scored 45/100 and needs a fix.
4 Fail
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AIO: Google Search eligibility
AIO: Google Search eligibility scored 45/100 and needs a fix.
Needs attention
AIO: Google Search eligibility
Issue
HTTP status is 403; Google Search AI features require an indexable 2xx page. Canonical tag is missing.
Details
Why it matters
Google AI Overviews and AI Mode depend on normal Google Search eligibility, snippet permissions, useful visible content, consistent structured data, trust signals, and page experience basics. These signals help Google understand and preview a page, but they do not guarantee selection.
Check name
AIO: Google Search eligibility
Score
45/100
Status
fail
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content eligible, understandable, and previewable for Google Search AI features without promising inclusion.
Result
AIO: Google Search eligibility scored 45/100 and needs a fix.
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
GEO: Citable passages
GEO: Citable passages scored 35/100 and needs a fix.
4 Fail
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
GEO: Citable passages
GEO: Citable passages scored 35/100 and needs a fix.
Needs attention
GEO: Citable passages
Issue
No evidence-backed, citation-length explanatory paragraph was found.
Details
Why it matters
Generative answer systems work best with visible, self-contained, evidence-backed content, clear entities, trustworthy attribution, structured page sections, and crawler-accessible HTML. These signals improve machine understanding even though they do not guarantee AI citations.
Check name
GEO: Citable passages
Score
35/100
Status
fail
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content easy for AI answer engines to extract, cite, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.
Result
GEO: Citable passages scored 35/100 and needs a fix.
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AIO: Page experience proxy
AIO: Page experience proxy scored 50/100 and needs improvement.
4 Warning
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AIO: Page experience proxy
AIO: Page experience proxy scored 50/100 and needs improvement.
Needs attention
AIO: Page experience proxy
Issue
Missing viewport meta tag. Only 82 words of visible rendered text were detected.
Details
Why it matters
Google AI Overviews and AI Mode depend on normal Google Search eligibility, snippet permissions, useful visible content, consistent structured data, trust signals, and page experience basics. These signals help Google understand and preview a page, but they do not guarantee selection.
Check name
AIO: Page experience proxy
Score
50/100
Status
warning
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content eligible, understandable, and previewable for Google Search AI features without promising inclusion.
Result
AIO: Page experience proxy scored 50/100 and needs improvement.
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AEO: Question and answer structure
AEO: Question and answer structure scored 48/100 and needs a fix.
4 Fail
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AEO: Question and answer structure
AEO: Question and answer structure scored 48/100 and needs a fix.
Needs attention
AEO: Question and answer structure
Issue
No natural question headings were detected. No visible FAQ or Q&A pattern was detected. No list or table answer format was detected.
Details
Why it matters
Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.
Check name
AEO: Question and answer structure
Score
48/100
Status
fail
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.
Result
AEO: Question and answer structure scored 48/100 and needs a fix.
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
GEO: Structured extraction
GEO: Structured extraction scored 38/100 and needs a fix.
4 Fail
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
GEO: Structured extraction
GEO: Structured extraction scored 38/100 and needs a fix.
Needs attention
GEO: Structured extraction
Issue
Missing or weak extraction signals: summary or key takeaways, lists for grouped facts or steps, FAQ or question-answer section where appropriate, direct definition sentence, typed JSON-LD structured data.
Details
Why it matters
Generative answer systems work best with visible, self-contained, evidence-backed content, clear entities, trustworthy attribution, structured page sections, and crawler-accessible HTML. These signals improve machine understanding even though they do not guarantee AI citations.
Check name
GEO: Structured extraction
Score
38/100
Status
fail
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content easy for AI answer engines to extract, cite, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.
Result
GEO: Structured extraction scored 38/100 and needs a fix.
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AEO: Extractable visible copy
AEO: Extractable visible copy scored 56/100 and needs improvement.
3 Warning
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AEO: Extractable visible copy
AEO: Extractable visible copy scored 56/100 and needs improvement.
Needs attention
AEO: Extractable visible copy
Issue
Only 82 visible words were detected for answer extraction. Visible text has few answer-oriented terms or explanatory markers.
Details
Why it matters
Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.
Check name
AEO: Extractable visible copy
Score
56/100
Status
warning
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.
Result
AEO: Extractable visible copy scored 56/100 and needs improvement.
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AEO: Entity and definition clarity
AEO: Entity and definition clarity scored 62/100 and needs improvement.
3 Warning
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AEO: Entity and definition clarity
AEO: Entity and definition clarity scored 62/100 and needs improvement.
Needs attention
AEO: Entity and definition clarity
Issue
Missing meta description or Open Graph description. No direct definition sentence was detected.
Details
Why it matters
Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.
Check name
AEO: Entity and definition clarity
Score
62/100
Status
warning
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.
Result
AEO: Entity and definition clarity scored 62/100 and needs improvement.
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Semantic HTML
Semantic HTML is partially implemented.
3 Warning
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Semantic HTML
Semantic HTML is partially implemented.
Needs attention
Semantic HTML
Issue
Semantic HTML is incomplete: expected exactly one visible main landmark, found 0.
Why it matters
Semantic HTML gives browsers, assistive technology, search systems, and agents reliable landmarks, headings, controls, form semantics, and image context.
Check name
Semantic HTML
Score
82/100
Status
warning
Category
Content Readiness
Maturity
Established
Goal
Expose readable page structure through semantic HTML and accessible controls.
Result
Semantic HTML is partially implemented.
Validation steps
Page landmarks
Expected exactly one visible main landmark; found 0.
Evidence log1 step · 3 lines
Page landmarks [fail]! Expected exactly one visible main landmark; found 0.INFOPage landmarksFAILCheck page landmarks evidence actual={"counts":{"main":0,"roleMain":0,"nav":0,"roleNavigation":0,"header":0,"roleBanner":0,"footer":0,"pageFooter":0,"roleContentinfo":0},"main":false} expected="semantic HTML evidence for this step"FAILPage landmarks failed issue="Expected exactly one visible main landmark; found 0."GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AIO: Visible content clarity
AIO: Visible content clarity scored 67/100 and needs improvement.
2 Warning
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AIO: Visible content clarity
AIO: Visible content clarity scored 67/100 and needs improvement.
Needs attention
AIO: Visible content clarity
Issue
Missing meta description or Open Graph description. Only 82 visible words were detected. 1 section(s) may benefit from clearer answer-first openings.
Details
Why it matters
Google AI Overviews and AI Mode depend on normal Google Search eligibility, snippet permissions, useful visible content, consistent structured data, trust signals, and page experience basics. These signals help Google understand and preview a page, but they do not guarantee selection.
Check name
AIO: Visible content clarity
Score
67/100
Status
warning
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content eligible, understandable, and previewable for Google Search AI features without promising inclusion.
Result
AIO: Visible content clarity scored 67/100 and needs improvement.
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
GEO: AI retrieval access
GEO: AI retrieval access scored 75/100 and needs improvement.
1 Warning
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
GEO: AI retrieval access
GEO: AI retrieval access scored 75/100 and needs improvement.
Needs attention
GEO: AI retrieval access
Issue
robots.txt was not fetched successfully, so crawler access could not be confirmed.
Details
Why it matters
Generative answer systems work best with visible, self-contained, evidence-backed content, clear entities, trustworthy attribution, structured page sections, and crawler-accessible HTML. These signals improve machine understanding even though they do not guarantee AI citations.
Check name
GEO: AI retrieval access
Score
75/100
Status
warning
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content easy for AI answer engines to extract, cite, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.
Result
GEO: AI retrieval access scored 75/100 and needs improvement.
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
GEO: Extractable HTML
GEO: Extractable HTML scored 75/100 and needs improvement.
1 Warning
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
GEO: Extractable HTML
GEO: Extractable HTML scored 75/100 and needs improvement.
Needs attention
GEO: Extractable HTML
Issue
Only 82 visible words were found in the initial HTML.
Details
Why it matters
Generative answer systems work best with visible, self-contained, evidence-backed content, clear entities, trustworthy attribution, structured page sections, and crawler-accessible HTML. These signals improve machine understanding even though they do not guarantee AI citations.
Check name
GEO: Extractable HTML
Score
75/100
Status
warning
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content easy for AI answer engines to extract, cite, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.
Result
GEO: Extractable HTML scored 75/100 and needs improvement.
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
GEO: Entity clarity
GEO: Entity clarity scored 80/100 and needs improvement.
1 Warning
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
GEO: Entity clarity
GEO: Entity clarity scored 80/100 and needs improvement.
Needs attention
GEO: Entity clarity
Issue
Missing meta or Open Graph description. Title/H1 terms missing from description: error, request, could, not, satisfied, 403.
Details
Why it matters
Generative answer systems work best with visible, self-contained, evidence-backed content, clear entities, trustworthy attribution, structured page sections, and crawler-accessible HTML. These signals improve machine understanding even though they do not guarantee AI citations.
Check name
GEO: Entity clarity
Score
80/100
Status
warning
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content easy for AI answer engines to extract, cite, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.
Result
GEO: Entity clarity scored 80/100 and needs improvement.
Agent Ease of UseAPIEstablished
API Catalog
API Catalog is informational for this page.
Informational
Agent Ease of UseAPIEstablished
API Catalog
API Catalog is informational for this page.
Needs attention
API Catalog
Issue
API Catalog is informational for this page.
Why it matters
API catalogs help agents find API endpoints, service descriptions, documentation, status resources, auth metadata, and related machine-readable contracts without guessing entry points.
Check name
API Catalog
Score
100/100
Status
informational
Category
API
Maturity
Established
Goal
Publish an API catalog for automated public API discovery using RFC 9727 when this origin exposes public APIs.
Result
API Catalog is informational for this page.
Validation steps
Fetch API catalog
No API catalog was found and no public API signal was detected.
Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Fetch API catalog [informational]! No API catalog was found and no public API signal was detected.INFOFetch API catalogINFOFetch /.well-known/api-catalog requestedUrl="https://rewardgateway.com/.well-known/api-catalog"PASSCompare API catalog HTTP status actual=403 expected="2xx/3xx"WARNNo API catalog was found and no public API signal was detected. status="informational"AI DiscoverabilityDiscoverabilityEstablished
IndexNow key
IndexNow key is informational for this page.
Informational
AI DiscoverabilityDiscoverabilityEstablished
IndexNow key
IndexNow key is informational for this page.
Needs attention
IndexNow key
Issue
IndexNow key is informational for this page.
Why it matters
IndexNow lets sites notify participating search engines about changed URLs, but ownership verification requires a UTF-8 key file whose filename matches the key.
Check name
IndexNow key
Score
100/100
Status
informational
Category
Discoverability
Maturity
Established
Goal
Verify that IndexNow ownership key placement is detectable when the site advertises it.
Result
IndexNow key is informational for this page.
Validation steps
Find advertised IndexNow key location
No IndexNow key location was advertised in HTML, Link headers, or robots.txt.
Fetch and validate IndexNow key file
No discoverable IndexNow key file was found.
Evidence log2 steps · 10 lines
Find advertised IndexNow key location [informational]! No IndexNow key location was advertised in HTML, Link headers, or robots.txt.INFOFind advertised IndexNow key locationINFOLook for IndexNow key hints in HTML, Link headers, and robots.txt supportedHints=["robots.txt IndexNow-Key","rel=indexnow-key","meta name=indexnow-key-location"]PASSCompare advertised key location count actual=0 expected="> 0"WARNNo IndexNow key location was advertised in HTML, Link headers, or robots.txt.Fetch and validate IndexNow key file [informational]! No discoverable IndexNow key file was found.INFOFetch and validate IndexNow key fileINFOLook for IndexNow key hints in HTML, Link headers, and robots.txt supportedHints=["robots.txt IndexNow-Key","rel=indexnow-key","meta name=indexnow-key-location"]PASSCompare advertised key location count actual=0 expected="> 0"INFOFetch each advertised same-origin key file and validate filename/body matchFAILCompare valid IndexNow key file count actual=0 expected="> 0"WARNNo discoverable IndexNow key file was found.
Performance and AccessibilityBest PracticesBrowser audit
Uses deprecated APIs
100 Fail
Performance and AccessibilityBest PracticesBrowser audit
Uses deprecated APIs
Check name
Uses deprecated APIs
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Device
desktop
Category
Best Practices
Estimated savings
1 warning found
Fix guidance
Deprecated APIs will eventually be removed from the browser. [Learn more about deprecated APIs](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/best-practices/deprecations/).
Evidence
{
"description": "Deprecated APIs will eventually be removed from the browser. [Learn more about deprecated APIs](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/best-practices/deprecations/).",
"displayValue": "1 warning found"
}SEOSEOBrowser audit
Links do not have descriptive text
50 Fail
SEOSEOBrowser audit
Links do not have descriptive text
Check name
Links do not have descriptive text
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Device
desktop
Category
SEO
Estimated savings
5 links found
Fix guidance
Descriptive link text helps search engines understand your content. [Learn how to make links more accessible](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/seo/link-text/).
Evidence
{
"description": "Descriptive link text helps search engines understand your content. [Learn how to make links more accessible](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/seo/link-text/).",
"displayValue": "5 links found"
}SEOSEOBrowser audit
robots.txt is not valid
50 Fail
SEOSEOBrowser audit
robots.txt is not valid
Check name
robots.txt is not valid
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Device
desktop
Category
SEO
Estimated savings
1 error found
Fix guidance
If your robots.txt file is malformed, crawlers may not be able to understand how you want your website to be crawled or indexed. [Learn more about robots.txt](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/seo/invalid-robots-txt/).
Evidence
{
"description": "If your robots.txt file is malformed, crawlers may not be able to understand how you want your website to be crawled or indexed. [Learn more about robots.txt](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/seo/invalid-robots-txt/).",
"displayValue": "1 error found"
}Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit
Avoid large layout shifts
13 Fail
Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit
Avoid large layout shifts
Check name
Avoid large layout shifts
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Device
desktop
Category
Performance
Estimated savings
5 layout shifts found
Fix guidance
These are the largest layout shifts observed on the page. Each table item represents a single layout shift, and shows the element that shifted the most. Below each item are possible root causes that led to the layout shift. Some of these layout shifts may not be included in the CLS metric value due to [windowing](https://web.dev/articles/cls#what_is_cls). [Learn how to improve CLS](https://web.dev/articles/optimize-cls)
References
https://web.dev/learn/performance/Evidence
{
"description": "These are the largest layout shifts observed on the page. Each table item represents a single layout shift, and shows the element that shifted the most. Below each item are possible root causes that led to the layout shift. Some of these layout shifts may not be included in the CLS metric value due to [windowing](https://web.dev/articles/cls#what_is_cls). [Learn how to improve CLS](https://web.dev/articles/optimize-cls)",
"displayValue": "5 layout shifts found"
}Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit
Layout shift culprits
13 Fail
Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit
Layout shift culprits
Check name
Layout shift culprits
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Device
desktop
Category
Performance
Fix guidance
Layout shifts occur when elements move absent any user interaction. [Investigate the causes of layout shifts](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/cls-culprit), such as elements being added, removed, or their fonts changing as the page loads.
References
https://web.dev/learn/performance/Evidence
{
"description": "Layout shifts occur when elements move absent any user interaction. [Investigate the causes of layout shifts](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/cls-culprit), such as elements being added, removed, or their fonts changing as the page loads."
}Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit
LCP request discovery
13 Fail
Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit
LCP request discovery
Check name
LCP request discovery
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Device
desktop
Category
Performance
Fix guidance
[Optimize LCP](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/lcp-discovery) by making the LCP image discoverable from the HTML immediately, and avoiding lazy-loading
References
https://web.dev/learn/performance/Evidence
{
"description": "[Optimize LCP](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/lcp-discovery) by making the LCP image discoverable from the HTML immediately, and avoiding lazy-loading"
}Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit
Links rely on color to be distinguishable.
13 Fail
Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit
Links rely on color to be distinguishable.
Check name
Links rely on color to be distinguishable.
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Device
desktop
Category
Performance
Fix guidance
Low-contrast text is difficult or impossible for many users to read. Link text that is discernible improves the experience for users with low vision. [Learn how to make links distinguishable](https://dequeuniversity.com/rules/axe/4.11/link-in-text-block).
References
https://web.dev/learn/performance/Evidence
{
"description": "Low-contrast text is difficult or impossible for many users to read. Link text that is discernible improves the experience for users with low vision. [Learn how to make links distinguishable](https://dequeuniversity.com/rules/axe/4.11/link-in-text-block)."
}Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit
Avoid enormous network payloads
6 Warning
Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit
Avoid enormous network payloads
Check name
Avoid enormous network payloads
Score
50/100
Status
warning
Device
desktop
Category
Performance
Estimated savings
Total size was 11,544 KiB
Fix guidance
Large network payloads cost users real money and are highly correlated with long load times. [Learn how to reduce payload sizes](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/total-byte-weight/).
References
https://web.dev/learn/performance/Evidence
{
"description": "Large network payloads cost users real money and are highly correlated with long load times. [Learn how to reduce payload sizes](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/total-byte-weight/).",
"displayValue": "Total size was 11,544 KiB",
"numericValue": 11821465
}Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit
Legacy JavaScript
6 Warning
Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit
Legacy JavaScript
Check name
Legacy JavaScript
Score
50/100
Status
warning
Device
desktop
Category
Performance
Estimated savings
Est savings of 13 KiB
Fix guidance
Polyfills and transforms enable older browsers to use new JavaScript features. However, many aren't necessary for modern browsers. Consider modifying your JavaScript build process to not transpile [Baseline](https://web.dev/articles/baseline-and-polyfills) features, unless you know you must support older browsers. [Learn why most sites can deploy ES6+ code without transpiling](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/legacy-javascript)
References
https://web.dev/learn/performance/Evidence
{
"description": "Polyfills and transforms enable older browsers to use new JavaScript features. However, many aren't necessary for modern browsers. Consider modifying your JavaScript build process to not transpile [Baseline](https://web.dev/articles/baseline-and-polyfills) features, unless you know you must support older browsers. [Learn why most sites can deploy ES6+ code without transpiling](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/legacy-javascript)",
"displayValue": "Est savings of 13 KiB"
}Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit
Minify CSS
6 Warning
Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit
Minify CSS
Check name
Minify CSS
Score
50/100
Status
warning
Device
desktop
Category
Performance
Estimated savings
Est savings of 21 KiB
Fix guidance
Minifying CSS files can reduce network payload sizes. [Learn how to minify CSS](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/unminified-css/).
References
https://web.dev/learn/performance/Evidence
{
"description": "Minifying CSS files can reduce network payload sizes. [Learn how to minify CSS](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/unminified-css/).",
"displayValue": "Est savings of 21 KiB",
"numericValue": 0
}Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit
Loading performance
4 Fail
Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit
Loading performance
Check name
Loading performance
Score
70/100
Status
fail
Device
desktop
Category
Performance
Fix guidance
Review the grouped loading performance checks and improve the failing sub-checks listed in evidence.
References
https://web.dev/learn/performance/Evidence
{
"checks": [
{
"id": "total-blocking-time",
"score": 9,
"title": "Total Blocking Time",
"displayValue": "830 ms",
"numericValue": 833.5
},
{
"id": "network-rtt",
"score": 100,
"title": "Network Round Trip Times",
"displayValue": "10 ms",
"numericValue": 13.112324999999998
},
{
"id": "speed-index",
"score": 65,
"title": "Speed Index",
"displayValue": "1.9 s",
"numericValue": 1936.7638670187293
},
{
"id": "server-response-time",
"score": 100,
"title": "Initial server response time was short",
"displayValue": "Root document took 10 ms",
"numericValue": 5
},
{
"id": "interactive",
"score": 49,
"title": "Time to Interactive",
"displayValue": "4.5 s",
"numericValue": 4544.432795023232
},
{
"id": "largest-contentful-paint",
"score": 99,
"title": "Largest Contentful Paint",
"displayValue": "0.7 s",
"numericValue": 711.0118125917427
},
{
"id": "first-contentful-paint",
"score": 99,
"title": "First Contentful Paint",
"displayValue": "0.6 s",
"numericValue": 591.00826881422
},
{
"id": "max-potential-fid",
"score": 39,
"title": "Max Potential First Input Delay",
"displayValue": "290 ms",
"numericValue": 288
}
]
}Fix with MCP or CLI
Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.
Score history
Public scan score over time
Public reports for this website origin. Select any point or report link to open that canonical report.
| Scan date | Score | Readiness | Report |
|---|---|---|---|
| 40/100 | Level 2, Agent-Limited | View report | |
| 38/100 | Level 2, Agent-Limited | Current report |