Rescan Report
Share Report
Copy Report Link
Rescan Report
Share Report
Copy Report Link
Export Report
73/100

OVERALL SCORE

Level 3, Bot-Aware

Moderate readiness for AI agents
AIDiscoverability83%Agent Easeof Use58%Security& Trust46%GEO, AIO, AEO64%SEO100%Performance& Accessibility97%
  • AI Discoverability 83 out of 100
  • Agent Ease of Use 58 out of 100
  • Security & Trust 46 out of 100
  • GEO, AIO and AEO 64 out of 100
  • SEO 100 out of 100
  • Performance and Accessibility 97 out of 100

CAPTURED SCREENSHOT

Captured website desktop screenshot

What AI sees of your website

PDF Generator API — Design Templates, Generate via API or No-Code favicon

PDF Generator API — Design Templates, Generate via API or No-Code

Design PDF templates visually, generate thousands via API or no-code. Free generators for invoices, certificates, and labels. SDKs for 7 languages.

Next step

Turn this report into a fix workflow

10 failed checks are ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.

Detailed report scores grouped by capability area
MetricScoreStatusPassedFailedWarningEvidence
AI Discoverability
83
Mostly ready3974View details
Discoverability
100
Strong1000
Content Readiness
85
Mostly ready2571View details
Bot Access Control
69
Needs work403
Agent Ease of Use
58
Needs work10115View details
API
82
Mostly ready802
Auth
50
Needs work003
MCP
50
Needs work215View details
Skill Discovery
50
Needs work005
GEO, AIO and AEO
64
Needs work945View details
GEO Readiness
51
Needs work222View details
AIO Readiness
89
Mostly ready402
AEO Readiness
52
Needs work321View details
SEO
100
Strong1000
SEO
100
Strong1000
Security & Trust
46
Priority fix854View details
Security & Trust
46
Priority fix854View details
Performance and Accessibility
97
Strong2421View details
Performance
100
Strong1621View details
Accessibility
92
Strong800

Prioritized recommendations

Issues ranked by score impact

36 items need attention

AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished

Markdown negotiation

Markdown negotiation is missing or incomplete.

30 Fail

Needs attention

Markdown negotiation

Failed check
01

Issue

Best candidate returned Content-Type "text/html" instead of text/markdown.

02

Why it matters

Markdown representations give agents a cleaner page form while preserving normal HTML for browsers and cache-safe representation handling.

Check name

Markdown negotiation

Score

10/100

Status

fail

Category

Content Readiness

Maturity

Established

Goal

Expose a useful Markdown representation through negotiation or an explicit alternate URL.

Result

Markdown negotiation is missing or incomplete.

Validation steps

  1. Markdown representation

    No usable Markdown representation was found through negotiation, advertised alternates, or conservative .md mirror checks.

  2. Same-URL negotiation

    Same-URL Accept: text/markdown did not return a valid Markdown representation.

  3. Markdown format validation

    Markdown response contains too much raw HTML to be a clean agent-facing Markdown representation.

  4. Advertised Markdown alternate

    No Link or HTML rel=alternate text/markdown URL was advertised.

  5. Conventional .md mirror

    Conventional .md mirror candidates did not return valid Markdown.

Evidence log5 steps · 15 lines
Markdown representation [fail]! No usable Markdown representation was found through negotiation, advertised alternates, or conservative .md mirror checks.INFOMarkdown representationFAILCheck usable Markdown representation was selected actual={"source":"negotiated","url":"https://templatefox.com/","statusCode":200,"contentType":"text/html","mediaType":"text/html","vary":"","requireVaryAccept":true,"contentTypeStatus":"fail","cacheStatus":"fail","bodyStatus":"fail","pass":false,"quality":{"valid":false,"formatStatus":"fail","dialect":"html-heavy","hasHeading":false,"headingCount":0,"wordCount":64145,"features":{"markdownLinks":0,"referenceLinks":0,"listItems":0,"tables":0,"taskListItems":0,"fencedCodeBlocks":0,"yamlFrontmatter":false,"jsonLdFencedBlocks":0,"admonitions":0,"strikethrough":0,"autolinks":0,"rawHtmlTags":936,"jsxOrMdxSignals":0},"issues":["missing-heading","raw-html-heavy","plain-text-like"],"excerpt":"<!DOCTYPE html><!--HI_yeyy2IVfdwQLWb8rU9--><html lang=\"en\" data-theme=\"light\" class=\"__variable_472ac2\" style=\"font-family:var(--font-inter)\"><head><meta charSet=\"utf-8\"/><meta charSet=\"utf-8\"/><meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-wi","issue":"Markdown response contains too much raw HTML to be a clean agent-facing Markdown representation."}} expected="negotiated, advertised alternate, or conventional mirror" selected={"source":"negotiated","url":"https://templatefox.com/","statusCode":200,"contentType":"text/html","mediaType":"text/html","vary":"","requireVaryAccept":true,"contentTypeStatus":"fail","cacheStatus":"fail","bodyStatus":"fail","pass":false,"quality":{"valid":false,"formatStatus":"fail","dialect":"html-heavy","hasHeading":false,"headingCount":0,"wordCount":64145,"features":{"markdownLinks":0,"referenceLinks":0,"listItems":0,"tables":0,"taskListItems":0,"fencedCodeBlocks":0,"yamlFrontmatter":false,"jsonLdFencedBlocks":0,"admonitions":0,"strikethrough":0,"autolinks":0,"rawHtmlTags":936,"jsxOrMdxSignals":0},"issues":["missing-heading","raw-html-heavy","plain-text-like"],"excerpt":"<!DOCTYPE html><!--HI_yeyy2IVfdwQLWb8rU9--><html lang=\"en\" data-theme=\"light\" class=\"__variable_472ac2\" style=\"font-family:var(--font-inter)\"><head><meta charSet=\"utf-8\"/><meta charSet=\"utf-8\"/><meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-wi","issue":"Markdown response contains too much raw HTML to be a clean agent-facing Markdown representation."}} candidatesChecked=2FAILMarkdown representation failed issue="No usable Markdown representation was found through negotiation, advertised alternates, or conservative .md mirror checks."Same-URL negotiation [fail]! Same-URL Accept: text/markdown did not return a valid Markdown representation.INFOSame-URL negotiationFAILCheck negotiated Markdown response actual={"statusCode":200,"mediaType":"text/html","vary":""} expected="HTTP 2xx text/markdown with Vary: Accept" url="https://templatefox.com/" statusCode=200 mediaType="text/html"FAILSame-URL negotiation failed issue="Same-URL Accept: text/markdown did not return a valid Markdown representation."Markdown format validation [fail]! Markdown response contains too much raw HTML to be a clean agent-facing Markdown representation.INFOMarkdown format validationFAILCheck Markdown body quality actual={"valid":false,"wordCount":64145,"headingCount":0,"dialect":"html-heavy"} expected="valid Markdown with substantive text and headings" valid=false dialect="html-heavy" wordCount=64145 headingCount=0FAILMarkdown format validation failed issue="Markdown response contains too much raw HTML to be a clean agent-facing Markdown representation."Advertised Markdown alternate [warning]! No Link or HTML rel=alternate text/markdown URL was advertised.INFOAdvertised Markdown alternateWARNCheck advertised Markdown alternate candidates actual=0 expected="> 0 when HTML advertises a Markdown alternate" advertisedUrls=[] candidateCount=0WARNAdvertised Markdown alternate has a warning issue="No Link or HTML rel=alternate text/markdown URL was advertised."Conventional .md mirror [fail]! Conventional .md mirror candidates did not return valid Markdown.INFOConventional .md mirrorFAILCheck conventional Markdown mirror candidates actual=1 expected="> 0 when a conventional mirror is discoverable" conventionalUrls=["https://templatefox.com/index.html.md"] candidateCount=1FAILConventional .md mirror failed issue="Conventional .md mirror candidates did not return valid Markdown."

Agent Ease of UseMCPEmerging recommendation

MCP Server Card

MCP Server Card failed at "Validate server-card shape".

25 Fail

Needs attention

MCP Server Card

Failed check
01

Issue

MCP Server Card is missing required fields: protocolVersion.

Details

02

Why it matters

MCP server cards give agents a stable, public pre-connection discovery surface for server identity, remote transports, protocol compatibility, and safe routing without guessing endpoints.

Check name

MCP Server Card

Score

50/100

Status

fail

Category

MCP

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish an MCP Server Card that helps agents discover remote MCP server transports before opening a session.

Result

MCP Server Card failed at "Validate server-card shape".

Validation steps

  1. Discover MCP server card

    The MCP server card was found only at a transitional or linked path.

  2. Validate server-card shape

    MCP Server Card is missing required fields: protocolVersion.

    Missing required fields
    • protocolVersion
    Compatibility warnings
    • Card uses the transitional serverInfo/protocolVersion/transport shape instead of the current remotes[] model.
  3. Validate MCP remotes

    At least one MCP remote is cross-origin and was not actively probed by this scanner.

  4. Probe same-origin MCP endpoint

    MCP remotes were discovered, but none could be safely probed by this scanner.

Evidence log4 steps · 32 lines
Discover MCP server card [warning]! The MCP server card was found only at a transitional or linked path.INFODiscover MCP server card candidateCount=5INFOBuild MCP server-card candidate list currentPath="/.well-known/mcp-server-card" transitionalPaths=["/.well-known/mcp/server-card.json","/.well-known/mcp/server-cards.json","/mcp.json","/.well-known/mcp.json"] linkedPaths=[]INFOTrying to fetch /.well-known/mcp-server-card url="https://templatefox.com/.well-known/mcp-server-card" source="current"FAIL/.well-known/mcp-server-card did not return a usable server card statusCode=404 contentType=nullINFOTrying to fetch /.well-known/mcp/server-card.json url="https://templatefox.com/.well-known/mcp/server-card.json" source="transitional"PASS/.well-known/mcp/server-card.json returned a successful response statusCode=200 contentType="application/json" finalUrl="https://templatefox.com/.well-known/mcp/server-card.json"INFOTrying to fetch /.well-known/mcp/server-cards.json url="https://templatefox.com/.well-known/mcp/server-cards.json" source="transitional"FAIL/.well-known/mcp/server-cards.json did not return a usable server card statusCode=404 contentType=nullINFOTrying to fetch /mcp.json url="https://templatefox.com/mcp.json" source="transitional"FAIL/mcp.json did not return a usable server card statusCode=404 contentType=nullINFOTrying to fetch /.well-known/mcp.json url="https://templatefox.com/.well-known/mcp.json" source="transitional"FAIL/.well-known/mcp.json did not return a usable server card statusCode=404 contentType=nullWARNCheck selected card is published at the current well-known path actual="/.well-known/mcp/server-card.json" expected="/.well-known/mcp-server-card" source="transitional" finalUrl="https://templatefox.com/.well-known/mcp/server-card.json"WARNMCP server card was discovered through a transitional or linked path path="/.well-known/mcp/server-card.json" source="transitional" reason="The MCP server card was found only at a transitional or linked path."Validate server-card shape [fail]! MCP Server Card is missing required fields: protocolVersion.INFOValidate server-card shape profile="legacy-server-card"PASSCheck response body parsed as JSON actual=true expected=truePASSCheck Content-Type is JSON-compatible actual=true expected=trueWARNCheck recognized MCP server-card profile actual="legacy-server-card" expected="sep-2127-draft" reason="Document uses the transitional serverInfo/protocolVersion/transport metadata model."FAILCheck required card fields are present actual=1 expected=0 missing=["protocolVersion"]WARNCheck MCP server-card uses the current remotes[] profile without legacy compatibility warnings actual="1 compatibility warning(s)" expected="current sep-2127-draft card shape with no legacy compatibility warnings" warnings=["Card uses the transitional serverInfo/protocolVersion/transport shape instead of the current remotes[] model."]FAILMCP server-card shape validation failed reason="MCP Server Card is missing required fields: protocolVersion."Validate MCP remotes [warning]! At least one MCP remote is cross-origin and was not actively probed by this scanner.INFOValidate MCP remotes remoteCount=1PASSCheck at least one MCP remote is declared actual=1 expected="> 0"PASSCheck invalid remote count actual=0 expected=0 invalidRemotes=[]WARNCheck same-origin remote coverage actual=0 expected=1PASSRemote #0 is syntactically usable index=0 source="transport" type="streamable-http" url="https://mcp-server-599407781746.us-central1.run.app/mcp" sameOrigin=false authRequired=false issues=[]WARNMCP remotes are valid but not all can be actively probed reason="At least one MCP remote is cross-origin and was not actively probed by this scanner."Probe same-origin MCP endpoint [warning]! MCP remotes were discovered, but none could be safely probed by this scanner.INFOProbe same-origin MCP endpoint probeCount=1INFOSelecting same-origin unauthenticated MCP remotes for a bounded initialize probeSKIPSkipped MCP endpoint probe url="https://mcp-server-599407781746.us-central1.run.app/mcp" reason="Cross-origin MCP remote was validated syntactically but not actively probed."WARNCheck successful initialize probe count actual=0 expected="> 0 when a safe same-origin unauthenticated remote exists" activeProbeCount=0 authBlocked=0WARNMCP endpoint probe could not fully confirm operability reason="MCP remotes were discovered, but none could be safely probed by this scanner."

Agent Ease of UseMCPEmerging recommendation

WebMCP

WebMCP has a validation warning at "Probe WebMCP operability".

25 Warning

Needs attention

WebMCP

Warning
01

Issue

No WebMCP surface was found to probe.

Details

02

Why it matters

WebMCP gives agents structured page and browser tool hints so they can understand actions without relying only on screen scraping.

Check name

WebMCP

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

MCP

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Expose browser/page WebMCP tools and compatible static WebMCP metadata when a site wants agents to understand in-page actions.

Result

WebMCP has a validation warning at "Probe WebMCP operability".

Validation steps

  1. Detect WebMCP runtime API

    Expose current WebMCP tools through document.modelContext.registerTool(), or clearly document navigator.modelContext as a compatibility/polyfill profile.

  2. Probe WebMCP operability

    No WebMCP surface was found to probe.

    WebMCP operability findings
    • No WebMCP surface was found to probe.
    • Conventional WebMCP manifest paths were checked but did not return a valid manifest.
  3. Validate declarative WebMCP form tools

    No W3C-style declarative WebMCP form attributes were found.

  4. Validate MCP-aware HTML annotations

    No data-mcp-tool or hyphenated WebMCP compatibility annotations were found.

  5. Validate static WebMCP JSON compatibility

    No static WebMCP JSON manifest or WMCP interaction graph was found.

  6. Validate WebMCP tool metadata quality

    Use clear tool names, useful descriptions, constrained schemas, side-effect clarity, and profile-appropriate naming.

  7. Review WebMCP security and policy signals

    Remove secrets and prompt-injection text from WebMCP metadata, avoid private endpoints, and use Permissions-Policy and annotations for tool safety.

Evidence log7 steps · 32 lines
Detect WebMCP runtime API [informational]INFODetect WebMCP runtime API status="informational"INFOProbe rendered browser for WebMCP runtime objects SKIPCheck current W3C runtime API actual="not detected" expected="document.modelContext/registerTool available"INFOWebMCP evidence was recorded for context. status="informational"Probe WebMCP operability [warning]! No WebMCP surface was found to probe.INFOProbe WebMCP operability status="warning"INFORun safe WebMCP operability checks safeProbeOnly=trueWARNCheck usable WebMCP evidence actual=0 expected="at least 1 usable runtime, declarative, annotation, or static manifest signal"WARNWebMCP operability warning warning="No WebMCP surface was found to probe."WARNWebMCP operability warning warning="Conventional WebMCP manifest paths were checked but did not return a valid manifest."WARNNo WebMCP surface was found to probe.Validate declarative WebMCP form tools [informational]! No W3C-style declarative WebMCP form attributes were found.INFOValidate declarative WebMCP form tools status="informational"INFOInspect visible forms and controls for current declarative WebMCP attributes annotatedElements=0 formsWithAttributes=0 controlsWithAttributes=0SKIPValidate declarative WebMCP attribute quality actual=0 expected=0INFONo W3C-style declarative WebMCP form attributes were found. status="informational"Validate MCP-aware HTML annotations [informational]! No data-mcp-tool or hyphenated WebMCP compatibility annotations were found.INFOValidate MCP-aware HTML annotations status="informational"INFOInspect HTML for MCP compatibility annotations compatibilityAttributeCount=0 dataMcpToolCount=0 examples=[]SKIPValidate compatibility annotation quality actual=0 expected=0INFONo data-mcp-tool or hyphenated WebMCP compatibility annotations were found. status="informational"Validate static WebMCP JSON compatibility [warning]! No static WebMCP JSON manifest or WMCP interaction graph was found.INFOValidate static WebMCP JSON compatibility status="warning"INFODiscover static WebMCP manifest candidates conventionalPaths=["/.well-known/webmcp.json","/webmcp.json"] checkedCount=2 profileCounts={}INFOWebMCP manifest candidate checked source="path" path="/.well-known/webmcp.json" url="https://templatefox.com/.well-known/webmcp.json" statusCode=404 contentType=nullINFOWebMCP manifest candidate checked source="path" path="/webmcp.json" url="https://templatefox.com/webmcp.json" statusCode=404 contentType=nullWARNValidate discovered static WebMCP metadata actual={"validManifestCount":0,"invalidManifestCount":0,"toolCount":0,"wmcpActionCount":0} expected="at least 1 valid tools[] manifest or WMCP graph when static metadata is present"WARNNo static WebMCP JSON manifest or WMCP interaction graph was found.Validate WebMCP tool metadata quality [informational]INFOValidate WebMCP tool metadata quality status="informational"INFOInspect WebMCP tool names, descriptions, schemas, and safety hints toolCount=0SKIPCheck tool metadata findings actual={"issueCount":0,"warningCount":0} expected="0 issues and 0 warnings"INFOWebMCP evidence was recorded for context. status="informational"Review WebMCP security and policy signals [informational]INFOReview WebMCP security and policy signals status="informational"INFOInspect WebMCP security and policy signals permissionsPolicy="(missing)" failureCount=0 warningCount=0PASSCheck security findings actual={"failures":0,"warnings":0} expected="0 failures and 0 warnings"INFOWebMCP evidence was recorded for context. status="informational"

Agent Ease of UseAuthEmerging recommendation

Auth.md Agent Registration

Auth.md Agent Registration has a validation warning at "Warn when auth surface lacks Auth.md".

17 Warning

Needs attention

Auth.md Agent Registration

Warning
01

Issue

The site appears to support login, signup, account access, or credentials but does not publish /auth.md.

02

Why it matters

Human login and signup flows are often opaque to agents. Auth.md gives automated clients a stable registration contract instead of forcing them to scrape docs, automate browser forms, or guess credential flows.

Check name

Auth.md Agent Registration

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

Auth

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish Auth.md v1 metadata so agents can discover how to register, claim a user, and obtain credentials.

Result

Auth.md Agent Registration has a validation warning at "Warn when auth surface lacks Auth.md".

Validation steps

  1. Warn when auth surface lacks Auth.md

    The site appears to support login, signup, account access, or credentials but does not publish /auth.md.

Evidence log1 step · 2 lines
Warn when auth surface lacks Auth.md [warning]! The site appears to support login, signup, account access, or credentials but does not publish /auth.md.INFOWarn when auth surface lacks Auth.mdWARNThe site appears to support login, signup, account access, or credentials but does not publish /auth.md.

Agent Ease of UseAuthEstablished

OAuth / OIDC discovery

OAuth / OIDC discovery has a validation warning at "Detect OAuth/OIDC applicability".

17 Warning

Needs attention

OAuth / OIDC discovery

Warning
01

Issue

Generic authentication signals were found, but no OAuth/OIDC discovery signal was detected.

02

Why it matters

OAuth and OIDC discovery let agents and API clients find authorization, token, and key endpoints programmatically instead of scraping login pages or guessing provider setup.

Check name

OAuth / OIDC discovery

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

Auth

Maturity

Established

Goal

Publish OAuth/OIDC discovery metadata only when the site operates or advertises a real OAuth/OIDC authorization server.

Result

OAuth / OIDC discovery has a validation warning at "Detect OAuth/OIDC applicability".

Validation steps

  1. Detect OAuth/OIDC applicability

    Generic authentication signals were found, but no OAuth/OIDC discovery signal was detected.

Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Detect OAuth/OIDC applicability [warning]! Generic authentication signals were found, but no OAuth/OIDC discovery signal was detected.INFODetect OAuth/OIDC applicabilityINFOInspecting homepage, headers, and known auth/API signals for OAuth or OIDC claims applies=false signalsCount=0 genericAuthSignalsCount=1 checkedCount=2WARNCheck OAuth/OIDC applicability signal actual=false expected="true when metadata exists or OAuth/OIDC is claimed" checked=[{"path":"/.well-known/openid-configuration","statusCode":404,"contentType":null,"length":0},{"path":"/.well-known/oauth-authorization-server","statusCode":404,"contentType":null,"length":0}]WARNDetect OAuth/OIDC applicability completed with warnings issue="Generic authentication signals were found, but no OAuth/OIDC discovery signal was detected."

Agent Ease of UseAuthEmerging recommendation

OAuth Protected Resource

OAuth Protected Resource has a validation warning at "Detect protected-resource applicability".

17 Warning

Needs attention

OAuth Protected Resource

Warning
01

Issue

Generic authentication signals were found, but no OAuth Protected Resource metadata signal was detected.

02

Why it matters

Protected-resource metadata tells agents which API/resource is locked, which authorization servers can issue tokens for it, and how a 401 challenge maps back to the correct resource.

Check name

OAuth Protected Resource

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

Auth

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish OAuth Protected Resource Metadata for OAuth-protected APIs and MCP resources so clients can identify the resource and its authorization servers.

Result

OAuth Protected Resource has a validation warning at "Detect protected-resource applicability".

Validation steps

  1. Detect protected-resource applicability

    Generic authentication signals were found, but no OAuth Protected Resource metadata signal was detected.

Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Detect protected-resource applicability [warning]! Generic authentication signals were found, but no OAuth Protected Resource metadata signal was detected.INFODetect protected-resource applicabilityINFOInspecting auth headers, MCP/OAuth claims, and protected-resource hints applies=false requiresAuthorizationServers=false signalsCount=0 genericAuthSignalsCount=1 checkedCount=1WARNCheck protected-resource metadata applicability actual=false expected="true when RFC 9728 metadata exists or support is claimed" checked=[{"url":"https://templatefox.com/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource","path":"/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource","source":"root-well-known","resourceIdentifier":"https://templatefox.com","statusCode":404,"contentType":null,"length":0}]WARNDetect protected-resource applicability completed with warnings issue="Generic authentication signals were found, but no OAuth Protected Resource metadata signal was detected."

AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEmerging recommendation

RSL license signal

No RSL declarations were found.

17 Warning

Needs attention

RSL license signal

Warning
01

Issue

No RSL declarations were found.

02

Why it matters

Really Simple Licensing is an emerging rights-expression layer for communicating content usage and licensing terms separately from robots.txt crawl permission.

Check name

RSL license signal

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

Bot Access Control

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Declare machine-readable content licensing terms for compliant AI and crawler systems when the site needs them.

Result

No RSL declarations were found.

Validation steps

  1. Discover RSL declarations

    No RSL declarations were found.

Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Discover RSL declarations [warning]! No RSL declarations were found.INFODiscover RSL declarationsINFOChecking robots.txt License records, HTTP Link rel=license headers, HTML license links, and inline RSL XML robotsFound=trueSKIPCount discovered RSL declarations actual=0 expected=">= 1 when RSL licensing terms are published" sources={}WARNNo RSL declarations were found on any supported discovery surface.

AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEmerging recommendation

TDMRep declaration

No TDMRep declaration was found.

17 Warning

Needs attention

TDMRep declaration

Warning
01

Issue

No TDMRep declaration was found at /.well-known/tdmrep.json.

02

Why it matters

TDMRep is a W3C Community Group protocol and IANA-registered well-known URI for declaring text and data mining reservation policy on applicable content.

Check name

TDMRep declaration

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

Bot Access Control

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish a machine-readable text and data mining reservation declaration and verifiable ODRL policy when the site needs one.

Result

No TDMRep declaration was found.

Validation steps

  1. Fetch /.well-known/tdmrep.json

    No TDMRep declaration was found at /.well-known/tdmrep.json.

Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Fetch /.well-known/tdmrep.json [warning]! No TDMRep declaration was found at /.well-known/tdmrep.json.INFOFetch /.well-known/tdmrep.jsonINFORequesting origin-level TDMRep declaration at /.well-known/tdmrep.jsonWARNCompare TDMRep file response actual=404 expected="2xx with JSON array when origin-level TDMRep is published" contentType=null length=0WARNNo TDMRep declaration was found at /.well-known/tdmrep.json. 

Agent Ease of UseAPIEstablished

OpenAPI discovery

OpenAPI discovery has a validation warning at "Discover OpenAPI document".

17 Warning

Needs attention

OpenAPI discovery

Warning
01

Issue

The site appears to publish or document a public API, but no OpenAPI or Swagger document was found.

02

Why it matters

OpenAPI documents let agents understand operations, schemas, authentication, servers, and request/response formats before calling an API.

Check name

OpenAPI discovery

Score

67/100

Status

warning

Category

API

Maturity

Established

Goal

Publish a valid OpenAPI or Swagger document for public API discovery when this origin exposes public APIs.

Result

OpenAPI discovery has a validation warning at "Discover OpenAPI document".

Validation steps

  1. Discover OpenAPI document

    The site appears to publish or document a public API, but no OpenAPI or Swagger document was found.

Evidence log1 step · 16 lines
Discover OpenAPI document [warning]! The site appears to publish or document a public API, but no OpenAPI or Swagger document was found.INFODiscover OpenAPI document status="warning"INFOBuild OpenAPI candidate list conventionalPaths=19 candidateCount=19 sources={"conventional-path":19}INFOFetch OpenAPI candidate path="/openapi.json" source="conventional-path" statusCode=404 contentType=nullINFOFetch OpenAPI candidate path="/openapi.yaml" source="conventional-path" statusCode=404 contentType=nullINFOFetch OpenAPI candidate path="/swagger.json" source="conventional-path" statusCode=404 contentType=nullINFOFetch OpenAPI candidate path="/swagger.yaml" source="conventional-path" statusCode=404 contentType=nullINFOFetch OpenAPI candidate path="/api/openapi.json" source="conventional-path" statusCode=404 contentType=nullINFOFetch OpenAPI candidate path="/api/openapi.yaml" source="conventional-path" statusCode=404 contentType=nullINFOFetch OpenAPI candidate path="/api/swagger.json" source="conventional-path" statusCode=404 contentType=nullINFOFetch OpenAPI candidate path="/api/swagger.yaml" source="conventional-path" statusCode=404 contentType=nullINFOFetch OpenAPI candidate path="/docs/openapi.json" source="conventional-path" statusCode=404 contentType=nullINFOFetch OpenAPI candidate path="/docs/openapi.yaml" source="conventional-path" statusCode=404 contentType=nullINFOFetch OpenAPI candidate path="/api-docs" source="conventional-path" statusCode=404 contentType=nullINFOFetch OpenAPI candidate path="/v3/api-docs" source="conventional-path" statusCode=404 contentType=nullWARNSelect a usable OpenAPI candidate actual="none" expected="same-origin candidate with a parseable OpenAPI or Swagger document"WARNThe site appears to publish or document a public API, but no OpenAPI or Swagger document was found.

AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEmerging recommendation

llms.txt

llms.txt failed at "Score llms.txt structure and usefulness".

16 Fail

Needs attention

llms.txt

Failed check
01

Issue

llms.txt includes unsafe or private links that should not be advertised to agents.

Details

02

Why it matters

llms.txt is an emerging Markdown convention for giving language-model clients curated context and links before they crawl broadly. Broken, private, or low-signal links make the file much less useful even when it exists.

Check name

llms.txt

Score

53/100

Status

fail

Category

Content Readiness

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish a concise llms.txt index that helps agents discover useful public site context.

Result

llms.txt failed at "Score llms.txt structure and usefulness".

Validation steps

  1. Score llms.txt structure and usefulness

    llms.txt includes unsafe or private links that should not be advertised to agents.

    Findings
    • 1 links point to private, internal, credentialed, or non-HTTP(S) targets.
  2. Probe sampled linked resources

    Most sampled llms.txt links were broken or none returned agent-readable content.

    Findings
    • 13/25 probed links were broken or unreachable.
    • 13/25 probed links did not look agent-readable.
  3. Inspect optional llms-full.txt

    Passed.

Evidence log3 steps · 19 lines
Score llms.txt structure and usefulness [fail]! llms.txt includes unsafe or private links that should not be advertised to agents.INFOScore llms.txt structure and usefulnessINFOChecking recommended summary, sections, link labels, agent-friendly links, duplicates, and unsafe targetsPASSCheck blockquote summary is present actual=true expected=truePASSCheck H2 section count actual=11 expected="> 0"PASSCheck Markdown-formatted links actual=23 expected="> 0"FAILCheck unsafe/private link count actual=1 expected=0FAILllms.txt structure-quality validation failed reason="llms.txt includes unsafe or private links that should not be advertised to agents."Probe sampled linked resources [fail]! Most sampled llms.txt links were broken or none returned agent-readable content.INFOProbe sampled linked resourcesINFOSelecting safe, useful links for bounded probing selectedCount=25PASSCheck probed links were attempted actual=25 expected="> 0"FAILCheck broken probed link count actual=13 expected=0PASSCheck agent-readable probed links actual=12 expected="> 0"FAILLinked resource probe validation failed reason="Most sampled llms.txt links were broken or none returned agent-readable content."Inspect optional llms-full.txt [informational]INFOInspect optional llms-full.txtINFOTrying to fetch /llms-full.txt url="https://templatefox.com/llms-full.txt"PASS/llms-full.txt returned HTTP 2xx statusCode=200 contentType="text/plain" length=13633PASSCheck llms-full.txt content type is Markdown-compatible text actual="text/plain" expected="text/markdown, text/x-markdown, text/plain, or another Markdown text type"PASSCheck llms-full.txt looks like supplemental full corpus content actual=true expected=truePASSOptional llms-full.txt inspection recorded

Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation

A2A Agent Card

A2A Agent Card has a validation warning at "Discover A2A Agent Card".

13 Warning

Needs attention

A2A Agent Card

Warning
01

Issue

No A2A Agent Card was found at the current, legacy, or fallback discovery paths.

02

Why it matters

A2A Agent Cards provide protocol-specific discovery for agent identity, skills, input and output modes, transport bindings, capabilities, and security requirements. Legacy A2A also used /.well-known/agent.json, so scanners must classify the card shape before reporting readiness.

Check name

A2A Agent Card

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

Skill Discovery

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish a version-appropriate A2A Agent Card so A2A-compatible clients can discover agent skills and invoke the declared endpoint safely.

Result

A2A Agent Card has a validation warning at "Discover A2A Agent Card".

Validation steps

  1. Discover A2A Agent Card

    No A2A Agent Card was found at the current, legacy, or fallback discovery paths.

Evidence log1 step · 8 lines
Discover A2A Agent Card [warning]! No A2A Agent Card was found at the current, legacy, or fallback discovery paths.INFODiscover A2A Agent CardINFOTry A2A discovery paths in priority order paths=["/.well-known/agent-card.json","/.well-known/agent.json","/agent-card.json","/.well-known/a2a/agent-card.json"]WARNA2A candidate path did not return a usable card path="/.well-known/agent-card.json" statusCode=404 contentType=nullWARNA2A candidate path did not return a usable card path="/.well-known/agent.json" statusCode=404 contentType=nullWARNA2A candidate path did not return a usable card path="/agent-card.json" statusCode=404 contentType=nullWARNA2A candidate path did not return a usable card path="/.well-known/a2a/agent-card.json" statusCode=404 contentType=nullWARNNo A2A Agent Card candidate was selectedWARNNo A2A Agent Card was found at the current, legacy, or fallback discovery paths.

Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation

Agent Skills index

Agent Skills index has a validation warning at "Discover Agent Skills index".

13 Warning

Needs attention

Agent Skills index

Warning
01

Issue

No Agent Skills discovery index was found at the canonical or legacy path.

02

Why it matters

An Agent Skills index lets agents discover task-specific instructions through a small trusted index, then verify and load only the skill artifacts they need.

Check name

Agent Skills index

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

Skill Discovery

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish an Agent Skills discovery index that advertises digest-pinned SKILL.md or archive artifacts.

Result

Agent Skills index has a validation warning at "Discover Agent Skills index".

Validation steps

  1. Discover Agent Skills index

    No Agent Skills discovery index was found at the canonical or legacy path.

Evidence log1 step · 5 lines
Discover Agent Skills index [warning]! No Agent Skills discovery index was found at the canonical or legacy path.INFODiscover Agent Skills indexINFOTry Agent Skills index paths in priority order paths=["/.well-known/agent-skills/index.json","/.well-known/skills/index.json"]WARNAgent Skills index candidate was not usable path="/.well-known/agent-skills/index.json" url="https://templatefox.com/.well-known/agent-skills/index.json" statusCode=404WARNAgent Skills index candidate was not usable path="/.well-known/skills/index.json" url="https://templatefox.com/.well-known/skills/index.json" statusCode=404WARNNo Agent Skills discovery index was found at the canonical or legacy path.

Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation

agents.json

agents.json has a validation warning at "Discover agents.json".

13 Warning

Needs attention

agents.json

Warning
01

Issue

No Wildcard-style agents.json file was found.

02

Why it matters

Wildcard agents.json gives agents workflow-level context beyond plain OpenAPI, including flows, links, examples, and API action structure. It is an emerging OpenAPI-adjacent proposal, so scanners should validate the contract shape without treating it as an A2A or IETF standard.

Check name

agents.json

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

Skill Discovery

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish a Wildcard-style agents.json file so agents can discover OpenAPI-backed workflows, links, examples, and authentication requirements.

Result

agents.json has a validation warning at "Discover agents.json".

Validation steps

  1. Discover agents.json

    No Wildcard-style agents.json file was found.

Evidence log1 step · 6 lines
Discover agents.json [warning]! No Wildcard-style agents.json file was found.INFODiscover agents.jsonINFOTry agents.json discovery paths in priority order paths=["/.well-known/agents.json","/agents.json"]WARNagents.json candidate path did not return a usable contract path="/.well-known/agents.json" statusCode=404 contentType=nullWARNagents.json candidate path did not return a usable contract path="/agents.json" statusCode=404 contentType=nullWARNNo agents.json candidate was selectedWARNNo Wildcard-style agents.json file was found.

Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation

DNS-AID Agent Discovery

DNS-AID Agent Discovery has a validation warning at "Query DNS-AID records".

13 Warning

Needs attention

DNS-AID Agent Discovery

Warning
01

Issue

No DNS-AID HTTPS/SVCB records were found under _agents.

02

Why it matters

DNS-AID lets agents discover index, A2A, and other agent entrypoints before fetching HTTP metadata. HTTPS/SVCB records provide the service-binding substrate, while DNSSEC can authenticate the discovery answer when available.

Check name

DNS-AID Agent Discovery

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

Skill Discovery

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish DNS-AID HTTPS/SVCB records under _agents for DNS-based agent entrypoint discovery.

Result

DNS-AID Agent Discovery has a validation warning at "Query DNS-AID records".

Validation steps

  1. Query DNS-AID records

    No DNS-AID HTTPS/SVCB records were found under _agents.

  2. Check DNSSEC authentication evidence

    DNSSEC authentication evidence was not visible for the DNS-AID labels or hostname.

Evidence log2 steps · 23 lines
Query DNS-AID records [warning]! No DNS-AID HTTPS/SVCB records were found under _agents.INFOQuery DNS-AID recordsINFOBuild DNS-AID query names from hostname hostname="templatefox.com" labels=["_index._agents.templatefox.com","_a2a._agents.templatefox.com"] claimedOnPage=falseWARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_index._agents.templatefox.com" rrtype="HTTPS" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" rcode=3 ad=false answerCount=0WARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_index._agents.templatefox.com" rrtype="SVCB" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" rcode=3 ad=false answerCount=0WARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_index._agents.templatefox.com" rrtype="ANY" resolver="node-resolveAny-fallback" answerCount=0 error="queryAny ETIMEOUT _index._agents.templatefox.com"WARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_a2a._agents.templatefox.com" rrtype="HTTPS" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" rcode=3 ad=false answerCount=0WARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_a2a._agents.templatefox.com" rrtype="SVCB" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" rcode=3 ad=false answerCount=0WARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_a2a._agents.templatefox.com" rrtype="ANY" resolver="node-resolveAny-fallback" answerCount=0 error="queryAny ETIMEOUT _a2a._agents.templatefox.com"WARNCompare total DNS-AID answer count actual=0 expected="> 0"WARNNo DNS-AID HTTPS/SVCB records were found under _agents.Check DNSSEC authentication evidence [warning]! DNSSEC authentication evidence was not visible for the DNS-AID labels or hostname.INFOCheck DNSSEC authentication evidenceWARNCompare DNSSEC authenticated-data flag actual=false expected=trueWARNCompare visible DNSSEC material actual=false expected=trueWARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_index._agents.templatefox.com" rrtype="HTTPS" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_index._agents.templatefox.com" rrtype="SVCB" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_index._agents.templatefox.com" rrtype="ANY" resolver="node-resolveAny-fallback" dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_a2a._agents.templatefox.com" rrtype="HTTPS" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_a2a._agents.templatefox.com" rrtype="SVCB" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_a2a._agents.templatefox.com" rrtype="ANY" resolver="node-resolveAny-fallback" dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_index._agents.templatefox.com" rrtype="DNSKEY" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_a2a._agents.templatefox.com" rrtype="DNSKEY" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="templatefox.com" rrtype="DNSKEY" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNDNSSEC authentication evidence was not visible for the DNS-AID labels or hostname.

Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished

Content-Security-Policy

Content-Security-Policy failed at "Find enforcing CSP delivery".

12 Fail

Needs attention

Content-Security-Policy

Failed check
01

Issue

Applicable HTML response is missing an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.

02

Why it matters

Content Security Policy reduces the impact of injection bugs by limiting where scripts, styles, frames, forms, and other browser resources can load or execute.

Check name

Content-Security-Policy

Score

40/100

Status

fail

Category

Security & Trust

Maturity

Established

Goal

Constrain browser resource loading and script execution with an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.

Result

Content-Security-Policy failed at "Find enforcing CSP delivery".

Validation steps

  1. Find enforcing CSP delivery

    Applicable HTML response is missing an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.

Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Find enforcing CSP delivery [fail]! Applicable HTML response is missing an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.INFOFind enforcing CSP deliveryINFORead CSP delivery headers enforcingHeader="missing" reportOnlyHeader="missing" metaPolicyCount=0 legacyHeadersPresent=[]FAILRequire enforcing Content-Security-Policy header actual="missing" expected="present" issue="Applicable HTML response is missing an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header."FAILApplicable HTML response is missing an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.

Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished

Referrer-Policy

Referrer-Policy failed at "Find Referrer-Policy header".

12 Fail

Needs attention

Referrer-Policy

Failed check
01

Issue

Referrer-Policy header is missing.

02

Why it matters

Referrer-Policy controls how much URL context is sent to other origins, limiting accidental leakage of paths, queries, and identifiers.

Check name

Referrer-Policy

Score

40/100

Status

fail

Category

Security & Trust

Maturity

Established

Goal

Limit how much referrer data leaves the site with an explicit Referrer-Policy header.

Result

Referrer-Policy failed at "Find Referrer-Policy header".

Validation steps

  1. Find Referrer-Policy header

    Referrer-Policy header is missing.

  2. Review observed browser responses

    One or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit Referrer-Policy.

Evidence log2 steps · 8 lines
Find Referrer-Policy header [fail]! Referrer-Policy header is missing.INFOFind Referrer-Policy headerINFORead Referrer-Policy delivery header="referrer-policy" value="missing" metaReferrerPolicyCount=0 browserDefault="strict-origin-when-cross-origin"FAILRequire explicit HTTP Referrer-Policy header actual="missing" expected="HTTP response header present" issue="Referrer-Policy header is missing."FAILReferrer-Policy header is missing.Review observed browser responses [warning]! One or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit Referrer-Policy.INFOReview observed browser responsesINFOSample Chrome-observed same-origin responses observedResponseCount=41 sameOriginCount=36 htmlDocumentCount=1WARNCompare observed Referrer-Policy coverage actual={"missingPolicyCount":1,"unsafeOrInvalidPolicyCount":0,"weakPolicyCount":0,"affected":[{"url":"https://templatefox.com/","status":200,"resourceType":"document","contentType":"text/html","referrerPolicy":null,"classification":"invalid"}]} expected="0 missing, unsafe, invalid, or weak same-origin HTML responses" issue="One or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit Referrer-Policy."WARNOne or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit Referrer-Policy.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Answer-first passages

AEO: Answer-first passages scored 0/100 and needs a fix.

12 Fail

Needs attention

AEO: Answer-first passages

Failed check
01

Issue

19 section(s) bury or omit a concise opening answer. No direct definition pattern was detected.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Answer-first passages

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Answer-first passages scored 0/100 and needs a fix.

Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished

Frame protection

Frame protection failed at "Validate X-Frame-Options".

11 Fail

Needs attention

Frame protection

Failed check
01

Issue

No valid X-Frame-Options fallback is present.

02

Why it matters

Frame protection blocks hostile sites from embedding pages in deceptive frames, reducing clickjacking and UI redressing risk.

Check name

Frame protection

Score

44/100

Status

fail

Category

Security & Trust

Maturity

Established

Goal

Prevent unwanted framing with an enforcing CSP frame-ancestors directive or a valid X-Frame-Options fallback.

Result

Frame protection failed at "Validate X-Frame-Options".

Validation steps

  1. Validate CSP frame-ancestors

    No enforcing CSP frame-ancestors directive is present.

  2. Validate X-Frame-Options

    No valid X-Frame-Options fallback is present.

  3. Review observed browser responses

    One or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit valid frame protection.

Evidence log3 steps · 12 lines
Validate CSP frame-ancestors [warning]! No enforcing CSP frame-ancestors directive is present.INFOValidate CSP frame-ancestorsINFORead CSP frame-ancestors signals enforcingHeaderPresent=false reportOnlyHeaderPresent=false metaFrameAncestors=false policyCount=0 duplicateDirectives=[]WARNCompare effective frame-ancestors directive actual="missing" expected="valid restrictive enforcing frame-ancestors" issue="No enforcing CSP frame-ancestors directive is present."WARNNo enforcing CSP frame-ancestors directive is present.Validate X-Frame-Options [fail]! No valid X-Frame-Options fallback is present.INFOValidate X-Frame-OptionsINFORead X-Frame-Options fallback value="missing" parsedValues=[] normalizedValues=[]FAILCompare X-Frame-Options value actual="missing" expected="DENY or SAMEORIGIN" valid=false obsoleteAllowFrom=false duplicateOrConflicting=false issue="No valid X-Frame-Options fallback is present."FAILNo valid X-Frame-Options fallback is present.Review observed browser responses [warning]! One or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit valid frame protection.INFOReview observed browser responsesINFOSample Chrome-observed same-origin responses observedResponseCount=41 sameOriginCount=36 htmlDocumentCount=1WARNCompare observed HTML frame protection actual={"missingOrInvalidFrameProtectionCount":1,"broadFrameAncestorsCount":0,"affected":[{"url":"https://templatefox.com/","status":200,"resourceType":"document","contentType":"text/html","contentSecurityPolicy":null,"contentSecurityPolicyReportOnly":null}]} expected="0 missing/invalid or broad same-origin HTML responses" issue="One or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit valid frame protection."WARNOne or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit valid frame protection.

Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished

HSTS header

HSTS header failed at "Find Strict-Transport-Security".

10 Fail

Needs attention

HSTS header

Failed check
01

Issue

HTTPS response is missing Strict-Transport-Security.

02

Why it matters

HSTS tells browsers to keep using HTTPS after the first secure visit, reducing downgrade, SSL-stripping, and mixed-transport risk for repeat users.

Check name

HSTS header

Score

50/100

Status

fail

Category

Security & Trust

Maturity

Established

Goal

Require HTTPS for repeat browser visits with a valid Strict-Transport-Security policy.

Result

HSTS header failed at "Find Strict-Transport-Security".

Validation steps

  1. Find Strict-Transport-Security

    HTTPS response is missing Strict-Transport-Security.

Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Find Strict-Transport-Security [fail]! HTTPS response is missing Strict-Transport-Security.INFOFind Strict-Transport-SecurityINFORead Strict-Transport-Security header header="strict-transport-security" value="missing" effectiveValue=null duplicateHeaderValueCount=0FAILRequire HSTS header on HTTPS response actual="missing" expected="present" issue="HTTPS response is missing Strict-Transport-Security."FAILHTTPS response is missing Strict-Transport-Security.

Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished

X-Content-Type-Options

X-Content-Type-Options failed at "Find X-Content-Type-Options".

9 Fail

Needs attention

X-Content-Type-Options

Failed check
01

Issue

Browser-loadable response is missing X-Content-Type-Options.

02

Why it matters

X-Content-Type-Options tells browsers to trust declared media types instead of sniffing content, reducing the risk that mislabeled files execute as active content.

Check name

X-Content-Type-Options

Score

57/100

Status

fail

Category

Security & Trust

Maturity

Established

Goal

Prevent browser MIME sniffing for browser-loadable responses with X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

Result

X-Content-Type-Options failed at "Find X-Content-Type-Options".

Validation steps

  1. Find X-Content-Type-Options

    Browser-loadable response is missing X-Content-Type-Options.

  2. Review observed browser responses

    One or more same-origin active resources observed by Chrome did not emit X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

Evidence log2 steps · 8 lines
Find X-Content-Type-Options [fail]! Browser-loadable response is missing X-Content-Type-Options.INFOFind X-Content-Type-OptionsINFORead X-Content-Type-Options header header="x-content-type-options" value="missing"FAILRequire nosniff header actual="missing" expected="present" issue="Browser-loadable response is missing X-Content-Type-Options."FAILBrowser-loadable response is missing X-Content-Type-Options.Review observed browser responses [warning]! One or more same-origin active resources observed by Chrome did not emit X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.INFOReview observed browser responsesINFOSample Chrome-observed same-origin resources observedResponseCount=41 sameOriginCount=36 eligibleCount=36WARNCompare observed nosniff coverage actual={"missingNosniffCount":36,"malformedNosniffCount":0,"activeResourceMissingNosniffCount":32,"affected":[{"url":"https://templatefox.com/","status":200,"resourceType":"document","contentType":"text/html"},{"url":"https://templatefox.com/_next/static/media/icon-200.67fd2c4d.webp","status":200,"resourceType":"image","contentType":"image/webp"},{"url":"https://templatefox.com/_next/static/media/e4af272ccee01ff0-s.p.woff2","status":200,"resourceType":"font","contentType":"font/woff2"},{"url":"https://templatefox.com/_next/static/chunks/6619-0b4e298f5c44ef82.js","status":200,"resourceType":"script","contentType":"text/javascript"},{"url":"https://templatefox.com/_next/static/chunks/2619-024c323f8ca0f6aa.js","status":200,"resourceType":"script","contentType":"text/javascript"},{"url":"https://templatefox.com/_next/static/chunks/2521-390587e8db4ea7e0.js","status":200,"resourceType":"script","contentType":"text/javascript"},{"url":"https://templatefox.com/_next/static/chunks/webpack-87764a41c20d0b23.js","status":200,"resourceType":"script","contentType":"text/javascript"},{"url":"https://templatefox.com/_next/static/chunks/7704-87b61d994d79d34b.js","status":200,"resourceType":"script","contentType":"text/javascript"},{"url":"https://templatefox.com/_next/static/chunks/4bd1b696-100b9d70ed4e49c1.js","status":200,"resourceType":"script","contentType":"text/javascript"},{"url":"https://templatefox.com/_next/static/chunks/5707-191565f1b177e10d.js","status":200,"resourceType":"script","contentType":"text/javascript"},{"url":"https://templatefox.com/_next/static/chunks/107-bb32fe647a609fa0.js","status":200,"resourceType":"script","contentType":"text/javascript"},{"url":"https://templatefox.com/_next/static/chunks/8936-05d7ceb5b48f48b0.js","status":200,"resourceType":"script","contentType":"text/javascript"}]} expected="0 missing or malformed eligible same-origin responses" issue="One or more same-origin active resources observed by Chrome did not emit X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff."WARNOne or more same-origin active resources observed by Chrome did not emit X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlInformational

Content Signal

Content Signal has a validation warning at "Validate declared usage preferences".

8 Warning

Needs attention

Content Signal

Warning
01

Issue

Declared content usage preferences are valid but partial or include unrecognized extension terms.

02

Why it matters

Content usage preference signals communicate intended downstream AI use separately from robots.txt crawl permission. They can express training and search preferences for compliant systems without replacing access-control rules.

Check name

Content Signal

Score

75/100

Status

warning

Category

Bot Access Control

Maturity

Informational

Goal

Declare AI content usage preferences when the site intentionally publishes machine-readable usage policy.

Result

Content Signal has a validation warning at "Validate declared usage preferences".

Validation steps

  1. Validate declared usage preferences

    Declared content usage preferences are valid but partial or include unrecognized extension terms.

Evidence log1 step · 5 lines
Validate declared usage preferences [warning]! Declared content usage preferences are valid but partial or include unrecognized extension terms.INFOValidate declared usage preferencesINFOParsing declared preferences into terms and values recordCount=1INFORecognized declaration formats formats=["legacy-content-signal"] sources=["robots.txt"]WARNCompare valid declarations to declared records actual=1 expected=">= 1 valid declaration with recognized preference terms" invalidRecords=[] warningRecords=[{"source":"robots.txt","directive":"Content-Signal","format":"legacy-content-signal","line":29,"preferences":["search=yes","ai-train=no"],"warnings":["Legacy Content-Signal declaration is partial; missing ai-input."]}]WARNLegacy Content-Signal declaration is partial; missing ai-input. record={"source":"robots.txt","directive":"Content-Signal","format":"legacy-content-signal","line":29,"preferences":["search=yes","ai-train=no"]}

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Question and answer structure

AEO: Question and answer structure scored 48/100 and needs a fix.

6 Fail

Needs attention

AEO: Question and answer structure

Failed check
01

Issue

No natural question headings were detected. No visible FAQ or Q&A pattern was detected. No list or table answer format was detected.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Question and answer structure

Score

48/100

Status

fail

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Question and answer structure scored 48/100 and needs a fix.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

GEO: AI retrieval access

GEO: AI retrieval access scored 35/100 and needs a fix.

6 Fail

Needs attention

GEO: AI retrieval access

Failed check
01

Issue

Relevant AI retrieval crawler(s) appear blocked for this URL: ClaudeBot.

Details

02

Why it matters

Generative answer systems work best with visible, self-contained, evidence-backed content, clear entities, trustworthy attribution, structured page sections, and crawler-accessible HTML. These signals improve machine understanding even though they do not guarantee AI citations.

Check name

GEO: AI retrieval access

Score

35/100

Status

fail

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for AI answer engines to extract, cite, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

GEO: AI retrieval access scored 35/100 and needs a fix.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

GEO: Citable passages

GEO: Citable passages scored 35/100 and needs a fix.

6 Fail

Needs attention

GEO: Citable passages

Failed check
01

Issue

No evidence-backed, citation-length explanatory paragraph was found.

Details

02

Why it matters

Generative answer systems work best with visible, self-contained, evidence-backed content, clear entities, trustworthy attribution, structured page sections, and crawler-accessible HTML. These signals improve machine understanding even though they do not guarantee AI citations.

Check name

GEO: Citable passages

Score

35/100

Status

fail

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for AI answer engines to extract, cite, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

GEO: Citable passages scored 35/100 and needs a fix.

AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished

Semantic HTML

Semantic HTML is partially implemented.

5 Warning

Needs attention

Semantic HTML

Warning
01

Issue

Semantic HTML is incomplete: 1 links missing accessible names.

Details

02

Why it matters

Semantic HTML gives browsers, assistive technology, search systems, and agents reliable landmarks, headings, controls, form semantics, and image context.

Check name

Semantic HTML

Score

84/100

Status

warning

Category

Content Readiness

Maturity

Established

Goal

Expose readable page structure through semantic HTML and accessible controls.

Result

Semantic HTML is partially implemented.

Validation steps

  1. Links

    1 links are missing accessible names.

Evidence log1 step · 3 lines
Links [fail]! 1 links are missing accessible names.INFOLinksFAILCheck links evidence actual={"counts":{"links":101,"inaccessibleLinks":1,"nonCrawlableLinks":0,"genericLinks":0},"accessibleLinks":false} expected="semantic HTML evidence for this step"FAILLinks failed issue="1 links are missing accessible names."

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

GEO: Structured extraction

GEO: Structured extraction scored 50/100 and needs improvement.

4 Warning

Needs attention

GEO: Structured extraction

Warning
01

Issue

Missing or weak extraction signals: summary or key takeaways, lists for grouped facts or steps, FAQ or question-answer section where appropriate, direct definition sentence.

Details

02

Why it matters

Generative answer systems work best with visible, self-contained, evidence-backed content, clear entities, trustworthy attribution, structured page sections, and crawler-accessible HTML. These signals improve machine understanding even though they do not guarantee AI citations.

Check name

GEO: Structured extraction

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for AI answer engines to extract, cite, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

GEO: Structured extraction scored 50/100 and needs improvement.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AIO: Page experience proxy

AIO: Page experience proxy scored 80/100 and needs improvement.

3 Warning

Needs attention

AIO: Page experience proxy

Warning
01

Issue

16 image(s) are missing width/height attributes.

Details

02

Why it matters

Google AI Overviews and AI Mode depend on normal Google Search eligibility, snippet permissions, useful visible content, consistent structured data, trust signals, and page experience basics. These signals help Google understand and preview a page, but they do not guarantee selection.

Check name

AIO: Page experience proxy

Score

80/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content eligible, understandable, and previewable for Google Search AI features without promising inclusion.

Result

AIO: Page experience proxy scored 80/100 and needs improvement.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Entity and definition clarity

AEO: Entity and definition clarity scored 75/100 and needs improvement.

3 Warning

Needs attention

AEO: Entity and definition clarity

Warning
01

Issue

No direct definition sentence was detected.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Entity and definition clarity

Score

75/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Entity and definition clarity scored 75/100 and needs improvement.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AIO: Structured data consistency

AIO: Structured data consistency scored 85/100 and needs improvement.

2 Warning

Needs attention

AIO: Structured data consistency

Warning
01

Issue

2 structured-data value(s) were not found in visible page text.

Details

02

Why it matters

Google AI Overviews and AI Mode depend on normal Google Search eligibility, snippet permissions, useful visible content, consistent structured data, trust signals, and page experience basics. These signals help Google understand and preview a page, but they do not guarantee selection.

Check name

AIO: Structured data consistency

Score

85/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content eligible, understandable, and previewable for Google Search AI features without promising inclusion.

Result

AIO: Structured data consistency scored 85/100 and needs improvement.

Agent Ease of UseAPIEstablished

API Catalog

API Catalog has a validation warning at "Check API catalog HEAD Link header".

2 Warning

Needs attention

API Catalog

Warning
01

Issue

HEAD /.well-known/api-catalog did not expose a Link header with rel="api-catalog".

02

Why it matters

API catalogs help agents find API endpoints, service descriptions, documentation, status resources, auth metadata, and related machine-readable contracts without guessing entry points.

Check name

API Catalog

Score

96/100

Status

warning

Category

API

Maturity

Established

Goal

Publish an API catalog for automated public API discovery using RFC 9727 when this origin exposes public APIs.

Result

API Catalog has a validation warning at "Check API catalog HEAD Link header".

Validation steps

  1. Check API catalog HEAD Link header

    HEAD /.well-known/api-catalog did not expose a Link header with rel="api-catalog".

Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Check API catalog HEAD Link header [warning]! HEAD /.well-known/api-catalog did not expose a Link header with rel="api-catalog".INFOCheck API catalog HEAD Link headerINFOSend HEAD request to API catalog path attempted=true statusCode=200 contentType="application/linkset+json; profile=\"https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9727\""WARNCompare HEAD Link rel=api-catalog count actual=0 expected="> 0"WARNHEAD /.well-known/api-catalog did not expose a Link header with rel="api-catalog". status="warning"

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

GEO: Source and trust signals

GEO: Source and trust signals scored 83/100 and needs improvement.

1 Warning

Needs attention

GEO: Source and trust signals

Warning
01

Issue

Missing source or trust signals: sourceLinks.

Details

02

Why it matters

Generative answer systems work best with visible, self-contained, evidence-backed content, clear entities, trustworthy attribution, structured page sections, and crawler-accessible HTML. These signals improve machine understanding even though they do not guarantee AI citations.

Check name

GEO: Source and trust signals

Score

83/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for AI answer engines to extract, cite, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

GEO: Source and trust signals scored 83/100 and needs improvement.

AI DiscoverabilityDiscoverabilityEstablished

IndexNow key

IndexNow key is informational for this page.

Informational

Needs attention

IndexNow key

Informational
01

Issue

IndexNow key is informational for this page.

02

Why it matters

IndexNow lets sites notify participating search engines about changed URLs, but ownership verification requires a UTF-8 key file whose filename matches the key.

Check name

IndexNow key

Score

100/100

Status

informational

Category

Discoverability

Maturity

Established

Goal

Verify that IndexNow ownership key placement is detectable when the site advertises it.

Result

IndexNow key is informational for this page.

Validation steps

  1. Find advertised IndexNow key location

    No IndexNow key location was advertised in HTML, Link headers, or robots.txt.

  2. Fetch and validate IndexNow key file

    No discoverable IndexNow key file was found.

Evidence log2 steps · 10 lines
Find advertised IndexNow key location [informational]! No IndexNow key location was advertised in HTML, Link headers, or robots.txt.INFOFind advertised IndexNow key locationINFOLook for IndexNow key hints in HTML, Link headers, and robots.txt supportedHints=["robots.txt IndexNow-Key","rel=indexnow-key","meta name=indexnow-key-location"]PASSCompare advertised key location count actual=0 expected="> 0"WARNNo IndexNow key location was advertised in HTML, Link headers, or robots.txt.Fetch and validate IndexNow key file [informational]! No discoverable IndexNow key file was found.INFOFetch and validate IndexNow key fileINFOLook for IndexNow key hints in HTML, Link headers, and robots.txt supportedHints=["robots.txt IndexNow-Key","rel=indexnow-key","meta name=indexnow-key-location"]PASSCompare advertised key location count actual=0 expected="> 0"INFOFetch each advertised same-origin key file and validate filename/body matchFAILCompare valid IndexNow key file count actual=0 expected="> 0"WARNNo discoverable IndexNow key file was found.

Performance and AccessibilityBest PracticesBrowser audit

Browser errors were logged to the console

100 Fail

Check name

Browser errors were logged to the console

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Device

desktop

Category

Best Practices

Fix guidance

Errors logged to the console indicate unresolved problems. They can come from network request failures and other browser concerns. [Learn more about this errors in console diagnostic audit](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/best-practices/errors-in-console/)

Evidence
{
  "description": "Errors logged to the console indicate unresolved problems. They can come from network request failures and other browser concerns. [Learn more about this errors in console diagnostic audit](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/best-practices/errors-in-console/)"
}

Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit

Touch targets do not have sufficient size or spacing.

33 Fail

Check name

Touch targets do not have sufficient size or spacing.

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Device

desktop

Category

Performance

Fix guidance

Touch targets with sufficient size and spacing help users who may have difficulty targeting small controls to activate the targets. [Learn more about touch targets](https://dequeuniversity.com/rules/axe/4.11/target-size).

Evidence
{
  "description": "Touch targets with sufficient size and spacing help users who may have difficulty targeting small controls to activate the targets. [Learn more about touch targets](https://dequeuniversity.com/rules/axe/4.11/target-size)."
}

Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit

Use efficient cache lifetimes

33 Fail

Check name

Use efficient cache lifetimes

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Device

desktop

Category

Performance

Estimated savings

Est savings of 5 KiB

Fix guidance

A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page. [Learn more about caching](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/cache).

Evidence
{
  "description": "A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page. [Learn more about caching](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/cache).",
  "displayValue": "Est savings of 5 KiB"
}

Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit

Reduce unused JavaScript

17 Warning

Check name

Reduce unused JavaScript

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Device

desktop

Category

Performance

Estimated savings

Est savings of 123 KiB

Fix guidance

Reduce unused JavaScript and defer loading scripts until they are required to decrease bytes consumed by network activity. [Learn how to reduce unused JavaScript](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/unused-javascript/).

Evidence
{
  "description": "Reduce unused JavaScript and defer loading scripts until they are required to decrease bytes consumed by network activity. [Learn how to reduce unused JavaScript](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/unused-javascript/).",
  "displayValue": "Est savings of 123 KiB",
  "numericValue": 0
}

Fix with MCP or CLI

Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.

Score history

Public scan score over time

Public reports for this website origin. Select any point or report link to open that canonical report.

1 reports
Public score history report links
Scan dateScoreReadinessReport
73/100Level 3, Bot-AwareCurrent report