Rescan Report
Share Report
Copy Report Link
Rescan Report
Share Report
Copy Report Link
Export Report
59/100

OVERALL SCORE

Level 3, Bot-Aware

Moderate readiness for AI agents
AIDiscoverability51%Agent Easeof Use50%Security& Trust51%GEO, AIO, AEO59%SEO100%Performance92%Accessibility93%
  • AI Discoverability 51 out of 100
  • Agent Ease of Use 50 out of 100
  • Security & Trust 51 out of 100
  • GEO, AIO and AEO 59 out of 100
  • SEO 100 out of 100
  • Performance 92 out of 100
  • Accessibility 93 out of 100

CAPTURED SCREENSHOT

Captured website desktop screenshot

What AI sees of your website

Gallup - Workplace Advisory Services & Global Analytics favicon

Gallup - Workplace Advisory Services & Global Analytics

Gallup goes beyond management consulting. Learn how our understanding of the human experience helps clients and the billions they serve thrive.

Next step

Turn this report into a fix workflow

2 failed checks are ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.

Detailed report scores grouped by capability area
MetricScoreStatusPassedFailedWarningEvidence
AI Discoverability
51
Needs work2200
Discoverability
40
Priority fix400
Content Readiness
46
Priority fix1500
Bot Access Control
63
Needs work300
GEO, AIO and AEO
59
Needs work700
GEO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable200
AIO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable300
AEO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable200
SEO
100
Strong1000
SEO
100
Strong1000
Security & Trust
51
Needs work1233View details
Security & Trust
51
Needs work1233View details
Performance
92
Strong1610View details
Performance
92
Strong1610View details

Prioritized recommendations

Issues ranked by score impact

3 items need attention

Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished

Content-Security-Policy

Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate fetch baseline".

25 Fail

Needs attention

Content-Security-Policy

Failed check
01

Issue

CSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback.

02

Why it matters

Content Security Policy reduces the impact of injection bugs by limiting where scripts, styles, frames, forms, and other browser resources can load or execute.

Check name

Content-Security-Policy

Score

50/100

Status

fail

Category

Security & Trust

Maturity

Established

Goal

Constrain browser resource loading and script execution with an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.

Result

Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate fetch baseline".

Validation steps

  1. Evaluate fetch baseline

    CSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback.

  2. Evaluate script execution

    No script-src or default-src directive constrains script execution.

  3. Review hardening directives

    CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri, form-action.

  4. Review CSP reporting

    CSP does not define a reporting endpoint.

Evidence log4 steps · 16 lines
Evaluate fetch baseline [fail]! CSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback.INFOEvaluate fetch baselineINFOEvaluate resource loading fallback explicitFetchDirectives=[]FAILCompare fetch baseline actual="0 explicit fetch directives" expected="restricted default-src or broad explicit fetch coverage" issue="CSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback."FAILCSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback.Evaluate script execution [fail]! No script-src or default-src directive constrains script execution.INFOEvaluate script executionINFOInspect effective script directive FAILCompare script execution posture actual={"hasNonce":false,"hasHash":false,"hasStrictDynamic":false,"hasUnsafeInline":false,"hasUnsafeEval":false,"hasWildcardHost":false,"hasBroadScheme":false,"dangerousSchemes":[]} expected="constrained script sources without unsafe execution allowances" issue="No script-src or default-src directive constrains script execution."FAILNo script-src or default-src directive constrains script execution.Review hardening directives [warning]! CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri, form-action.INFOReview hardening directivesINFOInspect CSP hardening directives frameAncestors=["*.gallupatwork.com","*.gallupatwork.au","*.gallupatwork.sg","*.gallupatwork.uk","*.gallup.com"] formCount=1WARNCompare recommended hardening coverage actual=["object-src","base-uri","form-action"] expected="no missing object-src/base-uri/form-action requirements" issue="CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri, form-action."WARNCSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri, form-action.Review CSP reporting [warning]! CSP does not define a reporting endpoint.INFOReview CSP reportingINFOInspect CSP reporting directives reportOnlyHeaderPresent=false reportOnlyDirectives=[]WARNCompare violation reporting configuration actual="no reporting endpoint" expected="report-to or report-uri present" issue="CSP does not define a reporting endpoint."WARNCSP does not define a reporting endpoint.

Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished

Frame protection

Frame protection failed at "Validate CSP frame-ancestors".

20 Fail

Needs attention

Frame protection

Failed check
01

Issue

frame-ancestors contains invalid source expressions: *.gallupatwork.com, *.gallupatwork.au, *.gallupatwork.sg, *.gallupatwork.uk, *.gallup.com.

02

Why it matters

Frame protection blocks hostile sites from embedding pages in deceptive frames, reducing clickjacking and UI redressing risk.

Check name

Frame protection

Score

60/100

Status

fail

Category

Security & Trust

Maturity

Established

Goal

Prevent unwanted framing with an enforcing CSP frame-ancestors directive or a valid X-Frame-Options fallback.

Result

Frame protection failed at "Validate CSP frame-ancestors".

Validation steps

  1. Validate CSP frame-ancestors

    frame-ancestors contains invalid source expressions: *.gallupatwork.com, *.gallupatwork.au, *.gallupatwork.sg, *.gallupatwork.uk, *.gallup.com.

  2. Review CSP and XFO interaction

    CSP frame-ancestors controls modern browser behavior, but the X-Frame-Options fallback is invalid or conflicting.

Evidence log2 steps · 8 lines
Validate CSP frame-ancestors [fail]! frame-ancestors contains invalid source expressions: *.gallupatwork.com, *.gallupatwork.au, *.gallupatwork.sg, *.gallupatwork.uk, *.gallup.com.INFOValidate CSP frame-ancestorsINFORead CSP frame-ancestors signals enforcingHeaderPresent=true reportOnlyHeaderPresent=false metaFrameAncestors=false policyCount=1 duplicateDirectives=[]FAILCompare effective frame-ancestors directive actual={"values":["*.gallupatwork.com","*.gallupatwork.au","*.gallupatwork.sg","*.gallupatwork.uk","*.gallup.com"],"mode":"malformed","valid":false,"restrictive":false,"broadSources":[]} expected="valid restrictive enforcing frame-ancestors" issue="frame-ancestors contains invalid source expressions: *.gallupatwork.com, *.gallupatwork.au, *.gallupatwork.sg, *.gallupatwork.uk, *.gallup.com."FAILframe-ancestors contains invalid source expressions: *.gallupatwork.com, *.gallupatwork.au, *.gallupatwork.sg, *.gallupatwork.uk, *.gallup.com.Review CSP and XFO interaction [warning]! CSP frame-ancestors controls modern browser behavior, but the X-Frame-Options fallback is invalid or conflicting.INFOReview CSP and XFO interactionINFOCompare modern CSP and legacy XFO behavior modernBrowserMechanism="csp-frame-ancestors" cspOverridesXfo=true cspMode="malformed" xfoDirective="sameorigin"WARNCheck CSP/XFO policy alignment actual="aligned or single mechanism" expected="no conflicting framing policy" issue="CSP frame-ancestors controls modern browser behavior, but the X-Frame-Options fallback is invalid or conflicting."WARNCSP frame-ancestors controls modern browser behavior, but the X-Frame-Options fallback is invalid or conflicting.

PerformancePerformanceBrowser audit

Forced reflow

100 Fail

Check name

Forced reflow

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Device

desktop

Category

Performance

Fix guidance

A forced reflow occurs when JavaScript queries geometric properties (such as offsetWidth) after styles have been invalidated by a change to the DOM state. This can result in poor performance. Learn more about [forced reflows](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/forced-reflow) and possible mitigations.

Evidence
{
  "description": "A forced reflow occurs when JavaScript queries geometric properties (such as offsetWidth) after styles have been invalidated by a change to the DOM state. This can result in poor performance. Learn more about [forced reflows](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/forced-reflow) and possible mitigations."
}

Sign in to see 35 other issues and the full report

Create a free account to unlock every issue, evidence details, exports, and higher free limits.

Development Note:

Please configure GOOGLE_CLIENT_ID in .env to activate live login.

Fix with MCP or CLI

Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.

Score history

Public scan score over time

Public reports for this website origin. Select any point or report link to open that canonical report.

1 reports
Public score history report links
Scan dateScoreReadinessReport
59/100Level 3, Bot-AwareCurrent report