Export Report
OVERALL SCORE
Level 2, Agent-Limited
- AI Discoverability 53 out of 100
- Agent Ease of Use 61 out of 100
- Security & Trust 91 out of 100
- GEO, AIO and AEO 39 out of 100
- SEO 92 out of 100
- Performance 43 out of 100
- Accessibility 0 out of 100
What AI sees of your website
POS Machine, Payment Gateway, Prepaid, Credit & Fintech Infrastructure | Pine Labs
Power your business with Pine Labs POS machines, payment gateways, prepaid solutions, credit processing and AI enabled fintech infrastructure for merchants and enterprises.
Next step
Turn this report into a fix workflow
1 failed check is ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.
| Metric | Score | Status | Passed | Failed | Warning | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI Discoverability | 53 | Needs work | 21 | 0 | 0 | |
| Discoverability | 67 | Needs work | 8 | 0 | 0 | |
| Content Readiness | 28 | Priority fix | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| Bot Access Control | 63 | Needs work | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| Agent Ease of Use | 61 | Needs work | 7 | 0 | 0 | |
| Agent Commerce | 73 | Needs work | 5 | 0 | 0 | |
| Google Agentic Browsing | 94 | Strong | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| GEO, AIO and AEO | 39 | Priority fix | 4 | 0 | 0 | |
| GEO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| AIO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| AEO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| SEO | 92 | Strong | 9 | 0 | 0 | |
| SEO | 92 | Strong | 9 | 0 | 0 | |
| Security & Trust | 91 | Strong | 24 | 1 | 2 | View details |
| Security & Trust | 91 | Strong | 24 | 1 | 2 | View details |
| Performance | 43 | Priority fix | 7 | 2 | 0 | View details |
| Performance | 43 | Priority fix | 7 | 2 | 0 | View details |
Prioritized recommendations
Issues ranked by score impact
3 items need attention
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Content-Security-Policy
Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate script execution".
35 Fail
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Content-Security-Policy
Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate script execution".
Needs attention
Content-Security-Policy
Issue
script-src leaves script execution broadly unrestricted.
Details
Why it matters
Content Security Policy reduces the impact of injection bugs by limiting where scripts, styles, frames, forms, and other browser resources can load or execute.
Check name
Content-Security-Policy
Score
65/100
Status
fail
Category
Security & Trust
Maturity
Established
Goal
Constrain browser resource loading and script execution with an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.
Result
Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate script execution".
Validation steps
Evaluate script execution
script-src leaves script execution broadly unrestricted.
CSP script execution policy is unsafe
Review hardening directives
CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri.
CSP hardening directives are missing or weak
Review CSP reporting
CSP does not define a reporting endpoint.
CSP reporting is missing or incomplete
Evidence log3 steps · 12 lines
Evaluate script execution [fail]! script-src leaves script execution broadly unrestricted.INFOEvaluate script executionINFOInspect effective script directive effectiveDirective="script-src" sources=["'self'","'unsafe-inline'","'unsafe-eval'","https://www.google.com/recaptcha/","https://www.gstatic.com/recaptcha/","https:","https://www.googletagmanager.com"]FAILCompare script execution posture actual={"hasNonce":false,"hasHash":false,"hasStrictDynamic":false,"hasUnsafeInline":true,"hasUnsafeEval":true,"hasWildcardHost":false,"hasBroadScheme":true,"dangerousSchemes":[]} expected="constrained script sources without unsafe execution allowances" issue="script-src leaves script execution broadly unrestricted."FAILscript-src leaves script execution broadly unrestricted.Review hardening directives [warning]! CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri.INFOReview hardening directivesINFOInspect CSP hardening directives objectSrcFallback=["'self'"] frameAncestors=["'self'","https://plcorp-cms.pinelabs.com","https://spend.zoho.in","https://expense.zoho.in","https://erp.zoho.in","https://spend.localzoho.com","https://expense.localzoho.com","https://erp.localzoho.com"] formCount=0WARNCompare recommended hardening coverage actual=["object-src","base-uri"] expected="no missing object-src/base-uri/form-action requirements" issue="CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri."WARNCSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri.Review CSP reporting [warning]! CSP does not define a reporting endpoint.INFOReview CSP reportingINFOInspect CSP reporting directives reportOnlyHeaderPresent=false reportOnlyDirectives=[]WARNCompare violation reporting configuration actual="no reporting endpoint" expected="report-to or report-uri present" issue="CSP does not define a reporting endpoint."WARNCSP does not define a reporting endpoint.
PerformancePerformanceBrowser audit
Avoid large layout shifts
50 Fail
PerformancePerformanceBrowser audit
Avoid large layout shifts
Check name
Avoid large layout shifts
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Device
desktop
Category
Performance
Estimated savings
12 layout shifts found
Fix guidance
These are the largest layout shifts observed on the page. Each table item represents a single layout shift, and shows the element that shifted the most. Below each item are possible root causes that led to the layout shift. Some of these layout shifts may not be included in the CLS metric value due to [windowing](https://web.dev/articles/cls#what_is_cls). [Learn how to improve CLS](https://web.dev/articles/optimize-cls)
References
web.dev/learn/performanceEvidence
{
"displayValue": "12 layout shifts found",
"description": "These are the largest layout shifts observed on the page. Each table item represents a single layout shift, and shows the element that shifted the most. Below each item are possible root causes that led to the layout shift. Some of these layout shifts may not be included in the CLS metric value due to [windowing](https://web.dev/articles/cls#what_is_cls). [Learn how to improve CLS](https://web.dev/articles/optimize-cls)"
}PerformancePerformanceBrowser audit
Font display
50 Fail
PerformancePerformanceBrowser audit
Font display
Check name
Font display
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Device
desktop
Category
Performance
Estimated savings
Est savings of 310 ms
Fix guidance
Consider setting [font-display](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/font-display) to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with [font metric overrides](https://developer.chrome.com/blog/font-fallbacks).
References
web.dev/learn/performanceEvidence
{
"displayValue": "Est savings of 310 ms",
"description": "Consider setting [font-display](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/font-display) to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with [font metric overrides](https://developer.chrome.com/blog/font-fallbacks)."
}Sign in to see 39 other issues and the full report
Create a free account to unlock every issue, evidence details, exports, and higher free limits.
Fix with MCP or CLI
Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.
Score history