CanAgentUse tools

UCP Suite

Validate Universal Commerce Protocol discovery, then test product search, carts, checkout links, and merchant handoff flows.

MCP Playground

Connect to remote MCP servers, inspect tools and resources, test prompts, auth, headers, notifications, and JSON-RPC responses.

A2A Playground

Inspect Agent Cards, validate advertised endpoints, and prepare safe requests for agent-to-agent workflows.

Agent Website Viewer

Enter a public URL and see the roles, names, landmarks, controls, and blockers that shape how AI agents understand the page.

SCANNED
Jul 29, 2026, 5:22 AM
VISIBILITY
Public
Rescan Report
Share Report
Copy Report Link
Export Report
56/100

OVERALL SCORE

Level 3, Bot-Aware

Moderate readiness for AI agents
AIDiscoverability57%Agent Easeof Use58%Security& Trust84%GEO, AIO, AEO66%SEO92%Performance40%Accessibility39%
  • AI Discoverability 57 out of 100
  • Agent Ease of Use 58 out of 100
  • Security & Trust 84 out of 100
  • GEO, AIO and AEO 66 out of 100
  • SEO 92 out of 100
  • Performance 40 out of 100
  • Accessibility 39 out of 100

CAPTURED SCREENSHOT

Captured website desktop screenshot

What AI sees of your website

Aiken SC News & South Carolina News favicon

Aiken SC News & South Carolina News

Stay connected with the Aiken Standard, delivering the latest local news, community events, government updates, business developments, sports coverage, and school news across Aiken County, South Carolina.

Open Agent View

Next step

Turn this report into a fix workflow

1 failed check is ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.

Fix with MCP / CLI
Detailed report scores grouped by capability area
MetricScoreStatusPassedFailedWarningEvidence
AI Discoverability
57
Needs work2532View details
Discoverability
67
Needs work800
Content Readiness
48
Priority fix1311View details
Bot Access Control
57
Needs work421View details
Agent Ease of Use
58
Needs work400
API
67
Needs work100
Auth
51
Needs work200
Google Agentic Browsing
71
Needs work100
GEO, AIO and AEO
66
Needs work600
GEO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable200
AIO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable300
AEO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable100
SEO
92
Strong900
SEO
92
Strong900
Security & Trust
84
Mostly ready2100
Security & Trust
84
Mostly ready2100
Performance
40
Priority fix910View details
Performance
40
Priority fix910View details

Prioritized recommendations

Issues ranked by score impact

3 items need attention

AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEmerging recommendation

ai.txt policy

ai.txt policy failed at "Fetch /ai.txt".

67 Fail

Needs attention

ai.txt policy

Failed check
01

Issue

/ai.txt returned HTTP 429.

Details

02

Why it matters

ai.txt is a fragmented emerging convention. It can communicate human-readable AI crawling, training, attribution, restriction, and contact guidance, but it is not a standard access-control mechanism and absence should not be penalized.

Check name

ai.txt policy

Score

33/100

Status

fail

Category

Bot Access Control

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish an advisory human-readable AI usage policy only when the site intentionally needs one.

Result

ai.txt policy failed at "Fetch /ai.txt".

Validation steps

  1. Fetch /ai.txt

    /ai.txt returned HTTP 429.

    /ai.txt could not be fetched when present
  2. Parse ai.txt policy

    ai.txt is present but does not follow the AI Visibility section model.

    /ai.txt policy format is missing required sections or non-standard
  3. Validate policy content

    ai.txt is too short to provide useful advisory policy guidance.

    /ai.txt content is incomplete or unsafe
Evidence log3 steps · 14 lines
Fetch /ai.txt [fail]! /ai.txt returned HTTP 429.INFOFetch /ai.txtINFORequesting optional advisory policy file at /ai.txtFAILCompare /ai.txt HTTP response actual=429 expected="2xx when ai.txt is intentionally published; 404/410 means absent optional file" contentType="text/plain" length=68FAIL/ai.txt returned HTTP 429. statusCode=429Parse ai.txt policy [warning]! ai.txt is present but does not follow the AI Visibility section model.INFOParse ai.txt policyINFODetecting ai.txt convention from bracket sections, frontmatter, headings, and ai.txt context linksINFODetected policy structure convention="unknown-text" sections=[] markdownHeadings=[]WARNCheck AI Visibility required sections actual="missing identity, permissions, restrictions" expected="identity, permissions, and restrictions" missingRecommended=["attribution","contact","content-types"]WARNai.txt is present but does not follow the AI Visibility section model.Validate policy content [fail]! ai.txt is too short to provide useful advisory policy guidance.INFOValidate policy contentINFOChecking required section content, permission/restriction language, attribution, contact details, and safety risks convention="unknown-text"INFODetected policy signals hasPermissionLanguage=false hasRestrictionLanguage=false hasTrainingLanguage=false hasAttributionLanguage=false hasContact=falseFAILCheck required and recommended section coverage actual={"missingRequired":["identity","permissions","restrictions"],"missingRecommended":["attribution","contact","content-types"]} expected={"missingRequired":[],"recommendedPresentWhenPossible":true}FAILai.txt is too short to provide useful advisory policy guidance.

AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished

Author attribution

Author attribution is partially implemented.

45 Warning

Needs attention

Author attribution

Warning
01

Issue

No named author or publisher identity could be extracted.

Details

02

Why it matters

Author attribution helps agents cite content responsibly, assess source credibility, and distinguish editorial pages from anonymous marketing copy.

Check name

Author attribution

Score

55/100

Status

warning

Category

Content Readiness

Maturity

Established

Goal

Identify content authors or publishers for trust and attribution.

Result

Author attribution is partially implemented.

Validation steps

  1. Schema.org attribution

    Schema.org attribution is incomplete or relies only on publisher/fallback evidence.

    Schema.org author attribution is missing or incomplete
  2. Author identity quality

    No named author or publisher identity could be extracted.

    Author identity quality is incomplete
Evidence log2 steps · 8 lines
Schema.org attribution [warning]! Schema.org attribution is incomplete or relies only on publisher/fallback evidence.INFOSchema.org attributionINFOChecking structured data for author, creator, and publisher contributorsWARNCheck named Schema.org author count actual=0 expected="> 0" authorCount=0 publisherCount=0 namedContributors=0 authors=[] publishers=[] formats=[]WARNSchema.org attribution is incomplete or fallback-only authorCount=0 publisherCount=0 authors=[] publishers=[]Author identity quality [fail]! No named author or publisher identity could be extracted.INFOAuthor identity qualityINFOChecking contributors for stable identity signalsFAILCheck identified contributor count actual=0 expected="> 0" namedContributors=0 identifiedContributors=[] unidentifiedContributors=[]FAILNo named contributor identity could be extracted

PerformancePerformanceBrowser audit

Avoid large layout shifts

100 Fail

Check name

Avoid large layout shifts

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Device

desktop

Category

Performance

Estimated savings

7 layout shifts found

Fix guidance

These are the largest layout shifts observed on the page. Each table item represents a single layout shift, and shows the element that shifted the most. Below each item are possible root causes that led to the layout shift. Some of these layout shifts may not be included in the CLS metric value due to [windowing](https://web.dev/articles/cls#what_is_cls). [Learn how to improve CLS](https://web.dev/articles/optimize-cls)

Evidence
{
  "displayValue": "7 layout shifts found",
  "description": "These are the largest layout shifts observed on the page. Each table item represents a single layout shift, and shows the element that shifted the most. Below each item are possible root causes that led to the layout shift. Some of these layout shifts may not be included in the CLS metric value due to [windowing](https://web.dev/articles/cls#what_is_cls). [Learn how to improve CLS](https://web.dev/articles/optimize-cls)"
}

Sign in to see 47 other issues and the full report

Create a free account to unlock every issue, evidence details, exports, and higher free limits.

Fix with MCP or CLI

Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.

Fix with MCP / CLI

Score history