Export Report
OVERALL SCORE
Level 3, Bot-Aware
- AI Discoverability 59 out of 100
- Agent Ease of Use 49 out of 100
- Security & Trust 77 out of 100
- GEO, AIO and AEO 55 out of 100
- SEO 85 out of 100
- Performance 55 out of 100
- Accessibility 79 out of 100
What AI sees of your website
Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu | RIVM
No page metadata or readable excerpt was captured.
Next step
Turn this report into a fix workflow
1 failed check is ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.
| Metric | Score | Status | Passed | Failed | Warning | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI Discoverability | 59 | Needs work | 26 | 0 | 0 | |
| Discoverability | 47 | Priority fix | 6 | 0 | 0 | |
| Content Readiness | 67 | Needs work | 17 | 0 | 0 | |
| Bot Access Control | 63 | Needs work | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| Agent Ease of Use | 49 | Priority fix | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| Auth | 47 | Priority fix | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Skill Discovery | 54 | Needs work | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Google Agentic Browsing | 42 | Priority fix | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| GEO, AIO and AEO | 55 | Needs work | 5 | 0 | 0 | |
| GEO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| AIO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| AEO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| SEO | 85 | Mostly ready | 8 | 1 | 0 | View details |
| SEO | 85 | Mostly ready | 8 | 1 | 0 | View details |
| Security & Trust | 77 | Mostly ready | 19 | 2 | 2 | View details |
| Security & Trust | 77 | Mostly ready | 19 | 2 | 2 | View details |
| Performance | 55 | Needs work | 12 | 1 | 0 | View details |
| Performance | 55 | Needs work | 12 | 1 | 0 | View details |
Prioritized recommendations
Issues ranked by score impact
3 items need attention
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Content-Security-Policy
Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate fetch baseline".
50 Fail
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Content-Security-Policy
Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate fetch baseline".
Needs attention
Content-Security-Policy
Issue
CSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback.
Details
Why it matters
Content Security Policy reduces the impact of injection bugs by limiting where scripts, styles, frames, forms, and other browser resources can load or execute.
Check name
Content-Security-Policy
Score
50/100
Status
fail
Category
Security & Trust
Maturity
Established
Goal
Constrain browser resource loading and script execution with an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.
Result
Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate fetch baseline".
Validation steps
Evaluate fetch baseline
CSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback.
CSP fetch baseline is too broad or missing
Evaluate script execution
No script-src or default-src directive constrains script execution.
CSP script execution policy is unsafe
Review hardening directives
CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri, form-action.
CSP hardening directives are missing or weak
Review CSP reporting
CSP does not define a reporting endpoint.
CSP reporting is missing or incomplete
Evidence log4 steps · 16 lines
Evaluate fetch baseline [fail]! CSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback.INFOEvaluate fetch baselineINFOEvaluate resource loading fallback explicitFetchDirectives=[]FAILCompare fetch baseline actual="0 explicit fetch directives" expected="restricted default-src or broad explicit fetch coverage" issue="CSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback."FAILCSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback.Evaluate script execution [fail]! No script-src or default-src directive constrains script execution.INFOEvaluate script executionINFOInspect effective script directive FAILCompare script execution posture actual={"hasNonce":false,"hasHash":false,"hasStrictDynamic":false,"hasUnsafeInline":false,"hasUnsafeEval":false,"hasWildcardHost":false,"hasBroadScheme":false,"dangerousSchemes":[]} expected="constrained script sources without unsafe execution allowances" issue="No script-src or default-src directive constrains script execution."FAILNo script-src or default-src directive constrains script execution.Review hardening directives [warning]! CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri, form-action.INFOReview hardening directivesINFOInspect CSP hardening directives formCount=1WARNCompare recommended hardening coverage actual=["object-src","base-uri","form-action"] expected="no missing object-src/base-uri/form-action requirements" issue="CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri, form-action."WARNCSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri, form-action.Review CSP reporting [warning]! CSP does not define a reporting endpoint.INFOReview CSP reportingINFOInspect CSP reporting directives reportOnlyHeaderPresent=true reportOnlyDirectives=["default-src","script-src","object-src","style-src","img-src","frame-src","frame-ancestors","child-src","font-src","connect-src","report-uri"]WARNCompare violation reporting configuration actual="no reporting endpoint" expected="report-to or report-uri present" issue="CSP does not define a reporting endpoint."WARNCSP does not define a reporting endpoint.
PerformancePerformanceBrowser audit
Avoid large layout shifts
100 Fail
PerformancePerformanceBrowser audit
Avoid large layout shifts
Check name
Avoid large layout shifts
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Device
desktop
Category
Performance
Estimated savings
4 layout shifts found
Fix guidance
These are the largest layout shifts observed on the page. Each table item represents a single layout shift, and shows the element that shifted the most. Below each item are possible root causes that led to the layout shift. Some of these layout shifts may not be included in the CLS metric value due to [windowing](https://web.dev/articles/cls#what_is_cls). [Learn how to improve CLS](https://web.dev/articles/optimize-cls)
References
web.dev/learn/performanceEvidence
{
"displayValue": "4 layout shifts found",
"description": "These are the largest layout shifts observed on the page. Each table item represents a single layout shift, and shows the element that shifted the most. Below each item are possible root causes that led to the layout shift. Some of these layout shifts may not be included in the CLS metric value due to [windowing](https://web.dev/articles/cls#what_is_cls). [Learn how to improve CLS](https://web.dev/articles/optimize-cls)"
}SEOSEOBrowser audit
Document does not have a meta description
100 Fail
SEOSEOBrowser audit
Document does not have a meta description
Check name
Document does not have a meta description
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Device
desktop
Category
SEO
Fix guidance
Meta descriptions may be included in search results to concisely summarize page content. [Learn more about the meta description](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/seo/meta-description/).
Evidence
{
"description": "Meta descriptions may be included in search results to concisely summarize page content. [Learn more about the meta description](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/seo/meta-description/)."
}Sign in to see 42 other issues and the full report
Create a free account to unlock every issue, evidence details, exports, and higher free limits.
Fix with MCP or CLI
Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.
Score history