CanAgentUse tools

UCP Suite

Validate Universal Commerce Protocol discovery, then test product search, carts, checkout links, and merchant handoff flows.

MCP Playground

Connect to remote MCP servers, inspect tools and resources, test prompts, auth, headers, notifications, and JSON-RPC responses.

A2A Playground

Inspect Agent Cards, validate advertised endpoints, and prepare safe requests for agent-to-agent workflows.

Agent Website Viewer

Enter a public URL and see the roles, names, landmarks, controls, and blockers that shape how AI agents understand the page.

SCANNED
Jul 15, 2026, 9:56 PM
VISIBILITY
Public
Rescan Report
Share Report
Copy Report Link
Export Report
63/100

OVERALL SCORE

Level 3, Bot-Aware

Moderate readiness for AI agents
AIDiscoverability58%Agent Easeof Use59%Security& Trust89%GEO, AIO, AEO56%SEO92%Performance48%Accessibility67%
  • AI Discoverability 58 out of 100
  • Agent Ease of Use 59 out of 100
  • Security & Trust 89 out of 100
  • GEO, AIO and AEO 56 out of 100
  • SEO 92 out of 100
  • Performance 48 out of 100
  • Accessibility 67 out of 100

CAPTURED SCREENSHOT

Captured website desktop screenshot

What AI sees of your website

Spirion Sensitive Data Governance Suite | archTIS favicon

Spirion Sensitive Data Governance Suite | archTIS

Spirion is the best in the world at accurate, automated and continuous Discovery, Classification and Remediation of at-risk sensitive data.

Open Agent View

Next step

Turn this report into a fix workflow

2 failed checks are ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.

Fix with MCP / CLI
Detailed report scores grouped by capability area
MetricScoreStatusPassedFailedWarningEvidence
AI Discoverability
58
Needs work2731View details
Discoverability
67
Needs work800
Content Readiness
35
Priority fix1531View details
Bot Access Control
69
Needs work400
Agent Ease of Use
59
Needs work200
Google Agentic Browsing
100
Strong200
GEO, AIO and AEO
56
Needs work500
GEO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable100
AIO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable200
AEO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable200
SEO
92
Strong900
SEO
92
Strong900
Security & Trust
89
Mostly ready2322View details
Security & Trust
89
Mostly ready2322View details
Performance
48
Priority fix1110View details
Performance
48
Priority fix1110View details

Prioritized recommendations

Issues ranked by score impact

3 items need attention

AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished

Author attribution

Author attribution is partially implemented.

95 Fail

Needs attention

Author attribution

Failed check
01

Issue

Applicable editorial content has no usable author, creator, publisher, visible byline, or HTML attribution signal.

Details

02

Why it matters

Author attribution helps agents cite content responsibly, assess source credibility, and distinguish editorial pages from anonymous marketing copy.

Check name

Author attribution

Score

5/100

Status

fail

Category

Content Readiness

Maturity

Established

Goal

Identify content authors or publishers for trust and attribution.

Result

Author attribution is partially implemented.

Validation steps

  1. Schema.org attribution

    Editorial content has no Schema.org author, creator, or publisher attribution.

    Schema.org author attribution is missing or incomplete
  2. Author identity quality

    No named author or publisher identity could be extracted.

    Author identity quality is incomplete
  3. Visible byline parity

    Structured author/publisher names were not found in visible byline text.

    Author attribution does not match visible byline content
  4. HTML attribution support

    No supporting HTML author metadata, rel=author link, or visible byline was found.

    HTML author attribution support is missing
Evidence log4 steps · 16 lines
Schema.org attribution [fail]! Editorial content has no Schema.org author, creator, or publisher attribution.INFOSchema.org attributionINFOChecking structured data for author, creator, and publisher contributorsFAILCheck named Schema.org author count actual=0 expected="> 0" authorCount=0 publisherCount=0 namedContributors=0 authors=[] publishers=[] formats=[]FAILNo Schema.org author, creator, or publisher attribution foundAuthor identity quality [fail]! No named author or publisher identity could be extracted.INFOAuthor identity qualityINFOChecking contributors for stable identity signalsFAILCheck identified contributor count actual=0 expected="> 0" namedContributors=0 identifiedContributors=[] unidentifiedContributors=[]FAILNo named contributor identity could be extractedVisible byline parity [fail]! Structured author/publisher names were not found in visible byline text.INFOVisible byline parityINFOComparing structured contributor names with visible byline evidenceFAILCheck visible attribution matches actual=0 expected="> 0 or visible byline present" visibleByline=false bylineCount=0FAILNo visible byline parity foundHTML attribution support [warning]! No supporting HTML author metadata, rel=author link, or visible byline was found.INFOHTML attribution supportINFOChecking meta author, rel=author, and visible byline supportWARNCheck HTML attribution support signals actual=0 expected="> 0" metaAuthor=false relAuthor=false visibleByline=falseWARNNo supporting HTML attribution signal found

Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished

Content-Security-Policy

Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate fetch baseline".

50 Fail

Needs attention

Content-Security-Policy

Failed check
01

Issue

CSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback.

Details

02

Why it matters

Content Security Policy reduces the impact of injection bugs by limiting where scripts, styles, frames, forms, and other browser resources can load or execute.

Check name

Content-Security-Policy

Score

50/100

Status

fail

Category

Security & Trust

Maturity

Established

Goal

Constrain browser resource loading and script execution with an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.

Result

Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate fetch baseline".

Validation steps

  1. Evaluate fetch baseline

    CSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback.

    CSP fetch baseline is too broad or missing
  2. Evaluate script execution

    No script-src or default-src directive constrains script execution.

    CSP script execution policy is unsafe
  3. Review hardening directives

    CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri, form-action.

    CSP hardening directives are missing or weak
  4. Review CSP reporting

    CSP does not define a reporting endpoint.

    CSP reporting is missing or incomplete
Evidence log4 steps · 16 lines
Evaluate fetch baseline [fail]! CSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback.INFOEvaluate fetch baselineINFOEvaluate resource loading fallback explicitFetchDirectives=[]FAILCompare fetch baseline actual="0 explicit fetch directives" expected="restricted default-src or broad explicit fetch coverage" issue="CSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback."FAILCSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback.Evaluate script execution [fail]! No script-src or default-src directive constrains script execution.INFOEvaluate script executionINFOInspect effective script directive FAILCompare script execution posture actual={"hasNonce":false,"hasHash":false,"hasStrictDynamic":false,"hasUnsafeInline":false,"hasUnsafeEval":false,"hasWildcardHost":false,"hasBroadScheme":false,"dangerousSchemes":[]} expected="constrained script sources without unsafe execution allowances" issue="No script-src or default-src directive constrains script execution."FAILNo script-src or default-src directive constrains script execution.Review hardening directives [warning]! CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri, form-action.INFOReview hardening directivesINFOInspect CSP hardening directives frameAncestors=["'self'","https://explore.spirion.com"] formCount=1WARNCompare recommended hardening coverage actual=["object-src","base-uri","form-action"] expected="no missing object-src/base-uri/form-action requirements" issue="CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri, form-action."WARNCSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri, form-action.Review CSP reporting [warning]! CSP does not define a reporting endpoint.INFOReview CSP reportingINFOInspect CSP reporting directives reportOnlyHeaderPresent=true reportOnlyDirectives=["default-src","script-src","connect-src","img-src","frame-src","font-src","style-src","object-src","base-uri","form-action","frame-ancestors","upgrade-insecure-requests"]WARNCompare violation reporting configuration actual="no reporting endpoint" expected="report-to or report-uri present" issue="CSP does not define a reporting endpoint."WARNCSP does not define a reporting endpoint.

PerformancePerformanceBrowser audit

Forced reflow

100 Fail

Check name

Forced reflow

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Device

desktop

Category

Performance

Fix guidance

A forced reflow occurs when JavaScript queries geometric properties (such as offsetWidth) after styles have been invalidated by a change to the DOM state. This can result in poor performance. Learn more about [forced reflows](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/forced-reflow) and possible mitigations.

Evidence
{
  "description": "A forced reflow occurs when JavaScript queries geometric properties (such as offsetWidth) after styles have been invalidated by a change to the DOM state. This can result in poor performance. Learn more about [forced reflows](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/forced-reflow) and possible mitigations."
}

Sign in to see 34 other issues and the full report

Create a free account to unlock every issue, evidence details, exports, and higher free limits.

Fix with MCP or CLI

Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.

Fix with MCP / CLI

Score history