Export Report
OVERALL SCORE
Level 3, Bot-Aware
- AI Discoverability 69 out of 100
- Agent Ease of Use 58 out of 100
- Security & Trust 62 out of 100
- GEO, AIO and AEO 69 out of 100
- SEO 100 out of 100
- Performance 69 out of 100
- Accessibility 97 out of 100
What AI sees of your website
Faceless YouTube Automation — Done-for-You Faceless YouTube Channels | Autober
Faceless YouTube automation, done for you. Autober writes, voices, edits and posts your faceless YouTube videos every month, in AI video or real footage, from 1 minute to 4 hours long. From $54/mo.
Next step
Turn this report into a fix workflow
2 failed checks are ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.
| Metric | Score | Status | Passed | Failed | Warning | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI Discoverability | 69 | Needs work | 41 | 2 | 1 | View details |
| Discoverability | 67 | Needs work | 8 | 0 | 0 | |
| Content Readiness | 81 | Mostly ready | 28 | 0 | 0 | |
| Bot Access Control | 62 | Needs work | 5 | 2 | 1 | View details |
| Agent Ease of Use | 58 | Needs work | 4 | 0 | 0 | |
| Auth | 48 | Priority fix | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Google Agentic Browsing | 97 | Strong | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| GEO, AIO and AEO | 69 | Needs work | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| GEO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| AIO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 4 | 0 | 0 | |
| AEO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 4 | 0 | 0 | |
| SEO | 100 | Strong | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| SEO | 100 | Strong | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| Security & Trust | 62 | Needs work | 13 | 1 | 0 | View details |
| Security & Trust | 62 | Needs work | 13 | 1 | 0 | View details |
| Performance | 69 | Needs work | 13 | 1 | 0 | View details |
| Performance | 69 | Needs work | 13 | 1 | 0 | View details |
Prioritized recommendations
Issues ranked by score impact
3 items need attention
AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEmerging recommendation
ai.txt policy
ai.txt policy failed at "Fetch /ai.txt".
67 Fail
AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEmerging recommendation
ai.txt policy
ai.txt policy failed at "Fetch /ai.txt".
Needs attention
ai.txt policy
Issue
/ai.txt returned HTTP 500.
Details
Why it matters
ai.txt is a fragmented emerging convention. It can communicate human-readable AI crawling, training, attribution, restriction, and contact guidance, but it is not a standard access-control mechanism and absence should not be penalized.
Check name
ai.txt policy
Score
33/100
Status
fail
Category
Bot Access Control
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Publish an advisory human-readable AI usage policy only when the site intentionally needs one.
Result
ai.txt policy failed at "Fetch /ai.txt".
Validation steps
Fetch /ai.txt
/ai.txt returned HTTP 500.
/ai.txt could not be fetched when present
Parse ai.txt policy
ai.txt is present but does not follow the AI Visibility section model.
/ai.txt policy format is missing required sections or non-standard
Validate policy content
ai.txt is too short to provide useful advisory policy guidance.
/ai.txt content is incomplete or unsafe
Evidence log3 steps · 14 lines
Fetch /ai.txt [fail]! /ai.txt returned HTTP 500.INFOFetch /ai.txtINFORequesting optional advisory policy file at /ai.txtFAILCompare /ai.txt HTTP response actual=500 expected="2xx when ai.txt is intentionally published; 404/410 means absent optional file" contentType="text/plain" length=21FAIL/ai.txt returned HTTP 500. statusCode=500Parse ai.txt policy [warning]! ai.txt is present but does not follow the AI Visibility section model.INFOParse ai.txt policyINFODetecting ai.txt convention from bracket sections, frontmatter, headings, and ai.txt context linksINFODetected policy structure convention="unknown-text" sections=[] markdownHeadings=[]WARNCheck AI Visibility required sections actual="missing identity, permissions, restrictions" expected="identity, permissions, and restrictions" missingRecommended=["attribution","contact","content-types"]WARNai.txt is present but does not follow the AI Visibility section model.Validate policy content [fail]! ai.txt is too short to provide useful advisory policy guidance.INFOValidate policy contentINFOChecking required section content, permission/restriction language, attribution, contact details, and safety risks convention="unknown-text"INFODetected policy signals hasPermissionLanguage=false hasRestrictionLanguage=false hasTrainingLanguage=false hasAttributionLanguage=false hasContact=falseFAILCheck required and recommended section coverage actual={"missingRequired":["identity","permissions","restrictions"],"missingRecommended":["attribution","contact","content-types"]} expected={"missingRequired":[],"recommendedPresentWhenPossible":true}FAILai.txt is too short to provide useful advisory policy guidance.
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Content-Security-Policy
Content-Security-Policy failed at "Find enforcing CSP delivery".
60 Fail
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Content-Security-Policy
Content-Security-Policy failed at "Find enforcing CSP delivery".
Needs attention
Content-Security-Policy
Issue
Applicable HTML response is missing an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.
Details
Why it matters
Content Security Policy reduces the impact of injection bugs by limiting where scripts, styles, frames, forms, and other browser resources can load or execute.
Check name
Content-Security-Policy
Score
40/100
Status
fail
Category
Security & Trust
Maturity
Established
Goal
Constrain browser resource loading and script execution with an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.
Result
Content-Security-Policy failed at "Find enforcing CSP delivery".
Validation steps
Find enforcing CSP delivery
Applicable HTML response is missing an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.
Enforcing Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Find enforcing CSP delivery [fail]! Applicable HTML response is missing an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.INFOFind enforcing CSP deliveryINFORead CSP delivery headers enforcingHeader="missing" reportOnlyHeader="missing" metaPolicyCount=0 legacyHeadersPresent=[]FAILRequire enforcing Content-Security-Policy header actual="missing" expected="present" issue="Applicable HTML response is missing an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header."FAILApplicable HTML response is missing an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.PerformancePerformanceBrowser audit
Forced reflow
100 Fail
PerformancePerformanceBrowser audit
Forced reflow
Check name
Forced reflow
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Device
desktop
Category
Performance
Fix guidance
A forced reflow occurs when JavaScript queries geometric properties (such as `offsetWidth`) after styles have been invalidated by a change to the DOM state. This can result in poor performance. Learn more about [forced reflows](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/forced-reflow) and possible mitigations.
References
web.dev/learn/performanceEvidence
{
"description": "A forced reflow occurs when JavaScript queries geometric properties (such as `offsetWidth`) after styles have been invalidated by a change to the DOM state. This can result in poor performance. Learn more about [forced reflows](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/forced-reflow) and possible mitigations."
}Sign in to see 35 other issues and the full report
Create a free account to unlock every issue, evidence details, exports, and higher free limits.
Fix with MCP or CLI
Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.
Score history