Export Report
OVERALL SCORE
Level 3, Bot-Aware
- AI Discoverability 68 out of 100
- Agent Ease of Use 50 out of 100
- Security & Trust 82 out of 100
- GEO, AIO and AEO 64 out of 100
- SEO 100 out of 100
- Performance 61 out of 100
- Accessibility 0 out of 100
What AI sees of your website
Chief Marketer - Marketing Strategies, Insights & Resources
Discover the latest marketing strategies, insights, and resources at Chief Marketer. Stay ahead with expert advice, industry trends, and actionable tips.
Next step
Turn this report into a fix workflow
1 failed check is ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.
| Metric | Score | Status | Passed | Failed | Warning | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI Discoverability | 68 | Needs work | 30 | 0 | 0 | |
| Discoverability | 65 | Needs work | 7 | 0 | 0 | |
| Content Readiness | 76 | Mostly ready | 20 | 0 | 0 | |
| Bot Access Control | 63 | Needs work | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| Agent Ease of Use | 50 | Needs work | 1 | 1 | 0 | View details |
| Google Agentic Browsing | 50 | Needs work | 1 | 1 | 0 | View details |
| GEO, AIO and AEO | 64 | Needs work | 8 | 0 | 0 | |
| GEO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| AIO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| AEO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| SEO | 100 | Strong | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| SEO | 100 | Strong | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| Security & Trust | 82 | Mostly ready | 20 | 2 | 2 | View details |
| Security & Trust | 82 | Mostly ready | 20 | 2 | 2 | View details |
| Performance | 61 | Needs work | 10 | 1 | 0 | View details |
| Performance | 61 | Needs work | 10 | 1 | 0 | View details |
Prioritized recommendations
Issues ranked by score impact
3 items need attention
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Content-Security-Policy
Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate fetch baseline".
50 Fail
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Content-Security-Policy
Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate fetch baseline".
Needs attention
Content-Security-Policy
Issue
CSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback.
Details
Why it matters
Content Security Policy reduces the impact of injection bugs by limiting where scripts, styles, frames, forms, and other browser resources can load or execute.
Check name
Content-Security-Policy
Score
50/100
Status
fail
Category
Security & Trust
Maturity
Established
Goal
Constrain browser resource loading and script execution with an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.
Result
Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate fetch baseline".
Validation steps
Evaluate fetch baseline
CSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback.
CSP fetch baseline is too broad or missing
Evaluate script execution
No script-src or default-src directive constrains script execution.
CSP script execution policy is unsafe
Review hardening directives
CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri, form-action.
CSP hardening directives are missing or weak
Review CSP reporting
CSP does not define a reporting endpoint.
CSP reporting is missing or incomplete
Evidence log4 steps · 16 lines
Evaluate fetch baseline [fail]! CSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback.INFOEvaluate fetch baselineINFOEvaluate resource loading fallback explicitFetchDirectives=[]FAILCompare fetch baseline actual="0 explicit fetch directives" expected="restricted default-src or broad explicit fetch coverage" issue="CSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback."FAILCSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback.Evaluate script execution [fail]! No script-src or default-src directive constrains script execution.INFOEvaluate script executionINFOInspect effective script directive FAILCompare script execution posture actual={"hasNonce":false,"hasHash":false,"hasStrictDynamic":false,"hasUnsafeInline":false,"hasUnsafeEval":false,"hasWildcardHost":false,"hasBroadScheme":false,"dangerousSchemes":[]} expected="constrained script sources without unsafe execution allowances" issue="No script-src or default-src directive constrains script execution."FAILNo script-src or default-src directive constrains script execution.Review hardening directives [warning]! CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri, form-action.INFOReview hardening directivesINFOInspect CSP hardening directives formCount=2WARNCompare recommended hardening coverage actual=["object-src","base-uri","form-action"] expected="no missing object-src/base-uri/form-action requirements" issue="CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri, form-action."WARNCSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri, form-action.Review CSP reporting [warning]! CSP does not define a reporting endpoint.INFOReview CSP reportingINFOInspect CSP reporting directives reportOnlyHeaderPresent=false reportOnlyDirectives=[]WARNCompare violation reporting configuration actual="no reporting endpoint" expected="report-to or report-uri present" issue="CSP does not define a reporting endpoint."WARNCSP does not define a reporting endpoint.
Agent Ease of UseGoogle Agentic BrowsingBrowser audit
Accessibility tree is not well-formed
100 Fail
Agent Ease of UseGoogle Agentic BrowsingBrowser audit
Accessibility tree is not well-formed
Check name
Accessibility tree is not well-formed
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Device
desktop
Category
Google Agentic Browsing
Fix guidance
A well-formed [accessibility tree](http://goo.gle/lighthouse-agentic-a11y) helps AI agents to navigate and interact with the page.
Evidence
{
"description": "A well-formed [accessibility tree](http://goo.gle/lighthouse-agentic-a11y) helps AI agents to navigate and interact with the page."
}PerformancePerformanceBrowser audit
Font display
100 Fail
PerformancePerformanceBrowser audit
Font display
Check name
Font display
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Device
desktop
Category
Performance
Estimated savings
Est savings of 50 ms
Fix guidance
Consider setting [font-display](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/font-display) to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with [font metric overrides](https://developer.chrome.com/blog/font-fallbacks).
References
web.dev/learn/performanceEvidence
{
"displayValue": "Est savings of 50 ms",
"description": "Consider setting [font-display](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/font-display) to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with [font metric overrides](https://developer.chrome.com/blog/font-fallbacks)."
}Sign in to see 44 other issues and the full report
Create a free account to unlock every issue, evidence details, exports, and higher free limits.
Fix with MCP or CLI
Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.
Score history