Export Report
OVERALL SCORE
Level 3, Bot-Aware
- AI Discoverability 65 out of 100
- Agent Ease of Use 48 out of 100
- Security & Trust 45 out of 100
- GEO, AIO and AEO 53 out of 100
- SEO 100 out of 100
- Performance 61 out of 100
- Accessibility 32 out of 100
What AI sees of your website
Easyhosting | Simpel en voordelig je eigen website online
In twintig jaar tijd is Easyhosting uitgegroeid tot dé specialist in domeinnaamregistraties, e-mail- en shared website hosting.
Next step
Turn this report into a fix workflow
1 failed check is ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.
| Metric | Score | Status | Passed | Failed | Warning | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI Discoverability | 65 | Needs work | 22 | 0 | 0 | |
| Discoverability | 67 | Needs work | 8 | 0 | 0 | |
| Content Readiness | 64 | Needs work | 11 | 0 | 0 | |
| Bot Access Control | 63 | Needs work | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| Agent Ease of Use | 48 | Priority fix | 1 | 1 | 0 | View details |
| Skill Discovery | 54 | Needs work | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Google Agentic Browsing | 33 | Priority fix | 0 | 1 | 0 | View details |
| GEO, AIO and AEO | 53 | Needs work | 4 | 0 | 0 | |
| GEO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| AIO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| AEO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| SEO | 100 | Strong | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| SEO | 100 | Strong | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| Security & Trust | 45 | Priority fix | 7 | 1 | 0 | View details |
| Security & Trust | 45 | Priority fix | 7 | 1 | 0 | View details |
| Performance | 61 | Needs work | 11 | 1 | 0 | View details |
| Performance | 61 | Needs work | 11 | 1 | 0 | View details |
Prioritized recommendations
Issues ranked by score impact
3 items need attention
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Content-Security-Policy
Content-Security-Policy failed at "Find enforcing CSP delivery".
60 Fail
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Content-Security-Policy
Content-Security-Policy failed at "Find enforcing CSP delivery".
Needs attention
Content-Security-Policy
Issue
Applicable HTML response is missing an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.
Details
Why it matters
Content Security Policy reduces the impact of injection bugs by limiting where scripts, styles, frames, forms, and other browser resources can load or execute.
Check name
Content-Security-Policy
Score
40/100
Status
fail
Category
Security & Trust
Maturity
Established
Goal
Constrain browser resource loading and script execution with an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.
Result
Content-Security-Policy failed at "Find enforcing CSP delivery".
Validation steps
Find enforcing CSP delivery
Applicable HTML response is missing an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.
Enforcing Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Find enforcing CSP delivery [fail]! Applicable HTML response is missing an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.INFOFind enforcing CSP deliveryINFORead CSP delivery headers enforcingHeader="missing" reportOnlyHeader="missing" metaPolicyCount=0 legacyHeadersPresent=[]FAILRequire enforcing Content-Security-Policy header actual="missing" expected="present" issue="Applicable HTML response is missing an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header."FAILApplicable HTML response is missing an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.Agent Ease of UseGoogle Agentic BrowsingBrowser audit
Accessibility tree is not well-formed
100 Fail
Agent Ease of UseGoogle Agentic BrowsingBrowser audit
Accessibility tree is not well-formed
Check name
Accessibility tree is not well-formed
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Device
desktop
Category
Google Agentic Browsing
Fix guidance
A well-formed [accessibility tree](http://goo.gle/lighthouse-agentic-a11y) helps AI agents to navigate and interact with the page.
Evidence
{
"description": "A well-formed [accessibility tree](http://goo.gle/lighthouse-agentic-a11y) helps AI agents to navigate and interact with the page."
}PerformancePerformanceBrowser audit
Avoid large layout shifts
100 Fail
PerformancePerformanceBrowser audit
Avoid large layout shifts
Check name
Avoid large layout shifts
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Device
desktop
Category
Performance
Estimated savings
4 layout shifts found
Fix guidance
These are the largest layout shifts observed on the page. Each table item represents a single layout shift, and shows the element that shifted the most. Below each item are possible root causes that led to the layout shift. Some of these layout shifts may not be included in the CLS metric value due to [windowing](https://web.dev/articles/cls#what_is_cls). [Learn how to improve CLS](https://web.dev/articles/optimize-cls)
References
web.dev/learn/performanceEvidence
{
"displayValue": "4 layout shifts found",
"description": "These are the largest layout shifts observed on the page. Each table item represents a single layout shift, and shows the element that shifted the most. Below each item are possible root causes that led to the layout shift. Some of these layout shifts may not be included in the CLS metric value due to [windowing](https://web.dev/articles/cls#what_is_cls). [Learn how to improve CLS](https://web.dev/articles/optimize-cls)"
}Sign in to see 45 other issues and the full report
Create a free account to unlock every issue, evidence details, exports, and higher free limits.
Fix with MCP or CLI
Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.
Score history