CanAgentUse tools

UCP Suite

Validate Universal Commerce Protocol discovery, then test product search, carts, checkout links, and merchant handoff flows.

MCP Playground

Connect to remote MCP servers, inspect tools and resources, test prompts, auth, headers, notifications, and JSON-RPC responses.

A2A Playground

Inspect Agent Cards, validate advertised endpoints, and prepare safe requests for agent-to-agent workflows.

Agent Website Viewer

Enter a public URL and see the roles, names, landmarks, controls, and blockers that shape how AI agents understand the page.

SCANNED
Jul 3, 2026, 8:06 PM
VISIBILITY
Public
Rescan Report
Share Report
Copy Report Link
Export Report
52/100

OVERALL SCORE

Level 3, Bot-Aware

Moderate readiness for AI agents
AIDiscoverability59%Agent Easeof Use61%Security& Trust87%GEO, AIO, AEO55%SEO85%Performance25%Accessibility19%
  • AI Discoverability 59 out of 100
  • Agent Ease of Use 61 out of 100
  • Security & Trust 87 out of 100
  • GEO, AIO and AEO 55 out of 100
  • SEO 85 out of 100
  • Performance 25 out of 100
  • Accessibility 19 out of 100

CAPTURED SCREENSHOT

Captured website desktop screenshot

What AI sees of your website

Governing: State and local government news and analysis favicon

Governing: State and local government news and analysis

Get the latest news coverage about policy and management in state and local government.

Open Agent View

Next step

Turn this report into a fix workflow

2 failed checks are ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.

Fix with MCP / CLI
Detailed report scores grouped by capability area
MetricScoreStatusPassedFailedWarningEvidence
AI Discoverability
59
Needs work2531View details
Discoverability
67
Needs work800
Content Readiness
36
Priority fix1231View details
Bot Access Control
70
Needs work500
Agent Ease of Use
61
Needs work200
API
67
Needs work100
Google Agentic Browsing
90
Strong100
GEO, AIO and AEO
55
Needs work600
GEO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable100
AIO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable300
AEO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable200
SEO
85
Mostly ready800
SEO
85
Mostly ready800
Security & Trust
87
Mostly ready2321View details
Security & Trust
87
Mostly ready2321View details
Performance
25
Priority fix910View details
Performance
25
Priority fix910View details

Prioritized recommendations

Issues ranked by score impact

3 items need attention

AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished

Content freshness signals

Content freshness signals is missing or incomplete.

100 Fail

Needs attention

Content freshness signals

Failed check
01

Issue

Content freshness signals are incomplete: missing any valid freshness date in Last-Modified, Schema.org, Open Graph, Dublin Core, generic meta, or sitemap lastmod.

Details

02

Why it matters

Freshness signals help agents, crawlers, and search systems decide whether content is current enough to cite, summarize, cache, or compare against newer sources.

Check name

Content freshness signals

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Category

Content Readiness

Maturity

Established

Goal

Expose modified and published dates for freshness-aware retrieval, citation, and ranking.

Result

Content freshness signals is missing or incomplete.

Validation steps

  1. Validate Last-Modified header

    No valid Last-Modified HTTP header was found.

    Last-Modified freshness signal is missing or invalid
  2. Validate structured freshness dates

    No Schema.org freshness dates were found.

    Structured freshness dates are missing or invalid
  3. Validate metadata freshness dates

    No Open Graph, Dublin Core, or generic meta freshness date was found.

    Metadata freshness dates are missing or invalid
  4. Corroborate with sitemap lastmod

    Add a sitemap entry with a valid lastmod for the canonical page URL when sitemap corroboration is useful.

    Sitemap lastmod corroboration is missing
Evidence log4 steps · 16 lines
Validate Last-Modified header [fail]! No valid Last-Modified HTTP header was found.INFOValidate Last-Modified headerINFOReading Last-Modified response headerFAILCheck Last-Modified header is present and parseable actual="missing" expected="valid" alternateDates=[]FAILLast-Modified header is missing or invalidValidate structured freshness dates [fail]! No Schema.org freshness dates were found.INFOValidate structured freshness datesINFOCollecting Schema.org freshness dates from JSON-LD, Microdata, and RDFaFAILCheck structured freshness date count actual=0 expected="> 0" invalidDateCount=0 formats={} alternateDates=[]FAILNo structured freshness dates foundValidate metadata freshness dates [fail]! No Open Graph, Dublin Core, or generic meta freshness date was found.INFOValidate metadata freshness datesINFOCollecting Open Graph, Dublin Core, and generic meta freshness datesFAILCheck metadata freshness date count actual=0 expected="> 0" metaDateCount=0 invalidDateCount=0 alternateDates=[]FAILNo metadata freshness dates foundCorroborate with sitemap lastmod [warning]INFOCorroborate with sitemap lastmodINFODiscovering sitemap candidates and matching the scanned page URL candidateCount=1 attempts=6WARNCheck matching sitemap lastmod actual="no match" expected="valid match when available" robotsStatusCode=200WARNNo matching sitemap lastmod found after sitemap attempts attempts=6

Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished

Content-Security-Policy

Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate fetch baseline".

42 Fail

Needs attention

Content-Security-Policy

Failed check
01

Issue

default-src is present but not meaningfully restrictive.

Details

02

Why it matters

Content Security Policy reduces the impact of injection bugs by limiting where scripts, styles, frames, forms, and other browser resources can load or execute.

Check name

Content-Security-Policy

Score

58/100

Status

fail

Category

Security & Trust

Maturity

Established

Goal

Constrain browser resource loading and script execution with an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.

Result

Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate fetch baseline".

Validation steps

  1. Evaluate fetch baseline

    default-src is present but not meaningfully restrictive.

    CSP fetch baseline is too broad or missing
  2. Evaluate script execution

    script-src leaves script execution broadly unrestricted.

    CSP script execution policy is unsafe
  3. Review CSP reporting

    CSP does not define a reporting endpoint.

    CSP reporting is missing or incomplete
Evidence log3 steps · 12 lines
Evaluate fetch baseline [fail]! default-src is present but not meaningfully restrictive.INFOEvaluate fetch baselineINFOEvaluate resource loading fallback defaultSrc=["'self'","https:"] explicitFetchDirectives=["connect-src","font-src","frame-src","img-src","media-src","object-src","script-src","style-src"]FAILCompare fetch baseline actual=["'self'","https:"] expected="restricted default-src or broad explicit fetch coverage" issue="default-src is present but not meaningfully restrictive."FAILdefault-src is present but not meaningfully restrictive.Evaluate script execution [fail]! script-src leaves script execution broadly unrestricted.INFOEvaluate script executionINFOInspect effective script directive effectiveDirective="script-src" sources=["'self'","'unsafe-inline'","'unsafe-eval'","https:"]FAILCompare script execution posture actual={"hasNonce":false,"hasHash":false,"hasStrictDynamic":false,"hasUnsafeInline":true,"hasUnsafeEval":true,"hasWildcardHost":false,"hasBroadScheme":true,"dangerousSchemes":[]} expected="constrained script sources without unsafe execution allowances" issue="script-src leaves script execution broadly unrestricted."FAILscript-src leaves script execution broadly unrestricted.Review CSP reporting [warning]! CSP does not define a reporting endpoint.INFOReview CSP reportingINFOInspect CSP reporting directives reportOnlyHeaderPresent=false reportOnlyDirectives=[]WARNCompare violation reporting configuration actual="no reporting endpoint" expected="report-to or report-uri present" issue="CSP does not define a reporting endpoint."WARNCSP does not define a reporting endpoint.

PerformancePerformanceBrowser audit

Avoid large layout shifts

100 Fail

Check name

Avoid large layout shifts

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Device

desktop

Category

Performance

Estimated savings

15 layout shifts found

Fix guidance

These are the largest layout shifts observed on the page. Each table item represents a single layout shift, and shows the element that shifted the most. Below each item are possible root causes that led to the layout shift. Some of these layout shifts may not be included in the CLS metric value due to [windowing](https://web.dev/articles/cls#what_is_cls). [Learn how to improve CLS](https://web.dev/articles/optimize-cls)

Evidence
{
  "displayValue": "15 layout shifts found",
  "description": "These are the largest layout shifts observed on the page. Each table item represents a single layout shift, and shows the element that shifted the most. Below each item are possible root causes that led to the layout shift. Some of these layout shifts may not be included in the CLS metric value due to [windowing](https://web.dev/articles/cls#what_is_cls). [Learn how to improve CLS](https://web.dev/articles/optimize-cls)"
}

Sign in to see 40 other issues and the full report

Create a free account to unlock every issue, evidence details, exports, and higher free limits.

Email code

Fix with MCP or CLI

Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.

Fix with MCP / CLI

Score history

Public scan score over time

Public reports for this website origin. Select any point or report link to open that canonical report.

1 reports
Public score history report links
Scan dateScoreReadinessReport
52/100Level 3, Bot-AwareCurrent report