Export Report
OVERALL SCORE
Level 3, Bot-Aware
- AI Discoverability 56 out of 100
- Agent Ease of Use 62 out of 100
- Security & Trust 81 out of 100
- GEO, AIO and AEO 61 out of 100
- SEO 92 out of 100
- Performance 52 out of 100
- Accessibility 79 out of 100
What AI sees of your website
Home Decorating Ideas, Kitchen Designs, Paint Colors - House Beautiful
Get the latest home decor inspiration and news from the editors of House Beautiful Magazine.
Next step
Turn this report into a fix workflow
2 failed checks are ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.
| Metric | Score | Status | Passed | Failed | Warning | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI Discoverability | 56 | Needs work | 22 | 3 | 1 | View details |
| Discoverability | 67 | Needs work | 8 | 0 | 0 | |
| Content Readiness | 36 | Priority fix | 11 | 3 | 1 | View details |
| Bot Access Control | 63 | Needs work | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| Agent Ease of Use | 62 | Needs work | 4 | 0 | 0 | |
| API | 67 | Needs work | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Auth | 48 | Priority fix | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Google Agentic Browsing | 100 | Strong | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| GEO, AIO and AEO | 61 | Needs work | 7 | 0 | 0 | |
| GEO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| AIO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| AEO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| SEO | 92 | Strong | 9 | 0 | 0 | |
| SEO | 92 | Strong | 9 | 0 | 0 | |
| Security & Trust | 81 | Mostly ready | 19 | 3 | 1 | View details |
| Security & Trust | 81 | Mostly ready | 19 | 3 | 1 | View details |
| Performance | 52 | Needs work | 11 | 1 | 0 | View details |
| Performance | 52 | Needs work | 11 | 1 | 0 | View details |
Prioritized recommendations
Issues ranked by score impact
3 items need attention
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Content freshness signals
Content freshness signals is missing or incomplete.
100 Fail
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Content freshness signals
Content freshness signals is missing or incomplete.
Needs attention
Content freshness signals
Issue
Content freshness signals are incomplete: missing any valid freshness date in Last-Modified, Schema.org, Open Graph, Dublin Core, generic meta, or sitemap lastmod.
Details
Why it matters
Freshness signals help agents, crawlers, and search systems decide whether content is current enough to cite, summarize, cache, or compare against newer sources.
Check name
Content freshness signals
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Category
Content Readiness
Maturity
Established
Goal
Expose modified and published dates for freshness-aware retrieval, citation, and ranking.
Result
Content freshness signals is missing or incomplete.
Validation steps
Validate Last-Modified header
No valid Last-Modified HTTP header was found.
Validate structured freshness dates
No Schema.org freshness dates were found.
Validate metadata freshness dates
No Open Graph, Dublin Core, or generic meta freshness date was found.
Corroborate with sitemap lastmod
Add a sitemap entry with a valid lastmod for the canonical page URL when sitemap corroboration is useful.
Evidence log4 steps · 16 lines
Validate Last-Modified header [fail]! No valid Last-Modified HTTP header was found.INFOValidate Last-Modified headerINFOReading Last-Modified response headerFAILCheck Last-Modified header is present and parseable actual="missing" expected="valid" alternateDates=[]FAILLast-Modified header is missing or invalidValidate structured freshness dates [fail]! No Schema.org freshness dates were found.INFOValidate structured freshness datesINFOCollecting Schema.org freshness dates from JSON-LD, Microdata, and RDFaFAILCheck structured freshness date count actual=0 expected="> 0" invalidDateCount=0 formats={} alternateDates=[]FAILNo structured freshness dates foundValidate metadata freshness dates [fail]! No Open Graph, Dublin Core, or generic meta freshness date was found.INFOValidate metadata freshness datesINFOCollecting Open Graph, Dublin Core, and generic meta freshness datesFAILCheck metadata freshness date count actual=0 expected="> 0" metaDateCount=0 invalidDateCount=0 alternateDates=[]FAILNo metadata freshness dates foundCorroborate with sitemap lastmod [warning]INFOCorroborate with sitemap lastmodINFODiscovering sitemap candidates and matching the scanned page URL candidateCount=3 attempts=8WARNCheck matching sitemap lastmod actual="no match" expected="valid match when available" robotsStatusCode=200WARNNo matching sitemap lastmod found after sitemap attempts attempts=8
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Content-Security-Policy
Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate fetch baseline".
57 Fail
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Content-Security-Policy
Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate fetch baseline".
Needs attention
Content-Security-Policy
Issue
default-src is present but not meaningfully restrictive.
Why it matters
Content Security Policy reduces the impact of injection bugs by limiting where scripts, styles, frames, forms, and other browser resources can load or execute.
Check name
Content-Security-Policy
Score
43/100
Status
fail
Category
Security & Trust
Maturity
Established
Goal
Constrain browser resource loading and script execution with an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.
Result
Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate fetch baseline".
Validation steps
Evaluate fetch baseline
default-src is present but not meaningfully restrictive.
Evaluate script execution
script-src leaves script execution broadly unrestricted.
Review hardening directives
object-src allows broad object/plugin loading.
Review CSP reporting
CSP does not define a reporting endpoint.
Evidence log4 steps · 16 lines
Evaluate fetch baseline [fail]! default-src is present but not meaningfully restrictive.INFOEvaluate fetch baselineINFOEvaluate resource loading fallback defaultSrc=["https:","data:","'unsafe-inline'","'unsafe-eval'","https:","https://accounts.google.com/gsi/"] explicitFetchDirectives=["child-src","connect-src","font-src","img-src","media-src","object-src","script-src","style-src"]FAILCompare fetch baseline actual=["https:","data:","'unsafe-inline'","'unsafe-eval'","https:","https://accounts.google.com/gsi/"] expected="restricted default-src or broad explicit fetch coverage" issue="default-src is present but not meaningfully restrictive."FAILdefault-src is present but not meaningfully restrictive.Evaluate script execution [fail]! script-src leaves script execution broadly unrestricted.INFOEvaluate script executionINFOInspect effective script directive effectiveDirective="script-src" sources=["data:","'unsafe-inline'","'unsafe-eval'","https:","blob:","https://accounts.google.com/gsi/client"]FAILCompare script execution posture actual={"hasNonce":false,"hasHash":false,"hasStrictDynamic":false,"hasUnsafeInline":true,"hasUnsafeEval":true,"hasWildcardHost":false,"hasBroadScheme":true,"dangerousSchemes":["data:","blob:"]} expected="constrained script sources without unsafe execution allowances" issue="script-src leaves script execution broadly unrestricted."FAILscript-src leaves script execution broadly unrestricted.Review hardening directives [fail]! object-src allows broad object/plugin loading.INFOReview hardening directivesINFOInspect CSP hardening directives objectSrc=["https:"] formAction=["https:"] frameAncestors=["'self'"] formCount=2FAILCompare recommended hardening coverage actual=["base-uri"] expected="no missing object-src/base-uri/form-action requirements" issue="object-src allows broad object/plugin loading."FAILobject-src allows broad object/plugin loading.Review CSP reporting [warning]! CSP does not define a reporting endpoint.INFOReview CSP reportingINFOInspect CSP reporting directives reportOnlyHeaderPresent=false reportOnlyDirectives=[]WARNCompare violation reporting configuration actual="no reporting endpoint" expected="report-to or report-uri present" issue="CSP does not define a reporting endpoint."WARNCSP does not define a reporting endpoint.
PerformancePerformanceBrowser audit
Forced reflow
100 Fail
PerformancePerformanceBrowser audit
Forced reflow
Check name
Forced reflow
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Device
desktop
Category
Performance
Fix guidance
A forced reflow occurs when JavaScript queries geometric properties (such as offsetWidth) after styles have been invalidated by a change to the DOM state. This can result in poor performance. Learn more about [forced reflows](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/forced-reflow) and possible mitigations.
References
https://web.dev/learn/performance/Evidence
{
"description": "A forced reflow occurs when JavaScript queries geometric properties (such as offsetWidth) after styles have been invalidated by a change to the DOM state. This can result in poor performance. Learn more about [forced reflows](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/forced-reflow) and possible mitigations."
}Sign in to see 40 other issues and the full report
Create a free account to unlock every issue, evidence details, exports, and higher free limits.
Fix with MCP or CLI
Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.
Score history
Public scan score over time
Public reports for this website origin. Select any point or report link to open that canonical report.
| Scan date | Score | Readiness | Report |
|---|---|---|---|
| 64/100 | Level 3, Bot-Aware | Current report |