Export Report
OVERALL SCORE
Level 3, Bot-Aware
- AI Discoverability 37 out of 100
- Agent Ease of Use 54 out of 100
- Security & Trust 76 out of 100
- GEO, AIO and AEO 39 out of 100
- SEO 91 out of 100
- Performance 84 out of 100
- Accessibility 48 out of 100
What AI sees of your website
ImageShack - Best place for all of your image hosting and image sharing needs
Host your images online with an easy to use image uploader, albums, photo hosting, sharing, dynamic image resizing on web and mobile.
Next step
Turn this report into a fix workflow
3 failed checks are ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.
| Metric | Score | Status | Passed | Failed | Warning | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI Discoverability | 37 | Priority fix | 10 | 3 | 1 | View details |
| Discoverability | 40 | Priority fix | 4 | 0 | 0 | |
| Content Readiness | 5 | Priority fix | 4 | 3 | 1 | View details |
| Bot Access Control | 60 | Needs work | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| Agent Ease of Use | 54 | Needs work | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| API | 67 | Needs work | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| GEO, AIO and AEO | 39 | Priority fix | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| AIO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| SEO | 91 | Strong | 7 | 0 | 0 | |
| SEO | 91 | Strong | 7 | 0 | 0 | |
| Security & Trust | 76 | Mostly ready | 17 | 2 | 2 | View details |
| Security & Trust | 76 | Mostly ready | 17 | 2 | 2 | View details |
| Performance | 84 | Mostly ready | 15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Performance | 84 | Mostly ready | 15 | 0 | 0 |
Prioritized recommendations
Issues ranked by score impact
3 items need attention
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Content freshness signals
Content freshness signals is missing or incomplete.
100 Fail
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Content freshness signals
Content freshness signals is missing or incomplete.
Needs attention
Content freshness signals
Issue
Content freshness signals are incomplete: missing any valid freshness date in Last-Modified, Schema.org, Open Graph, Dublin Core, generic meta, or sitemap lastmod.
Details
Why it matters
Freshness signals help agents, crawlers, and search systems decide whether content is current enough to cite, summarize, cache, or compare against newer sources.
Check name
Content freshness signals
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Category
Content Readiness
Maturity
Established
Goal
Expose modified and published dates for freshness-aware retrieval, citation, and ranking.
Result
Content freshness signals is missing or incomplete.
Validation steps
Validate Last-Modified header
No valid Last-Modified HTTP header was found.
Validate structured freshness dates
No Schema.org freshness dates were found.
Validate metadata freshness dates
No Open Graph, Dublin Core, or generic meta freshness date was found.
Corroborate with sitemap lastmod
Add a sitemap entry with a valid lastmod for the canonical page URL when sitemap corroboration is useful.
Evidence log4 steps · 16 lines
Validate Last-Modified header [fail]! No valid Last-Modified HTTP header was found.INFOValidate Last-Modified headerINFOReading Last-Modified response headerFAILCheck Last-Modified header is present and parseable actual="missing" expected="valid" alternateDates=[]FAILLast-Modified header is missing or invalidValidate structured freshness dates [fail]! No Schema.org freshness dates were found.INFOValidate structured freshness datesINFOCollecting Schema.org freshness dates from JSON-LD, Microdata, and RDFaFAILCheck structured freshness date count actual=0 expected="> 0" invalidDateCount=0 formats={} alternateDates=[]FAILNo structured freshness dates foundValidate metadata freshness dates [fail]! No Open Graph, Dublin Core, or generic meta freshness date was found.INFOValidate metadata freshness datesINFOCollecting Open Graph, Dublin Core, and generic meta freshness datesFAILCheck metadata freshness date count actual=0 expected="> 0" metaDateCount=0 invalidDateCount=0 alternateDates=[]FAILNo metadata freshness dates foundCorroborate with sitemap lastmod [warning]INFOCorroborate with sitemap lastmodINFODiscovering sitemap candidates and matching the scanned page URL candidateCount=1 attempts=1WARNCheck matching sitemap lastmod actual="no match" expected="valid match when available" robotsStatusCode=200WARNNo matching sitemap lastmod found after sitemap attempts attempts=1
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Content-Security-Policy
Content-Security-Policy failed at "Find enforcing CSP delivery".
30 Fail
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Content-Security-Policy
Content-Security-Policy failed at "Find enforcing CSP delivery".
Needs attention
Content-Security-Policy
Issue
Applicable HTML response is missing an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.
Why it matters
Content Security Policy reduces the impact of injection bugs by limiting where scripts, styles, frames, forms, and other browser resources can load or execute.
Check name
Content-Security-Policy
Score
40/100
Status
fail
Category
Security & Trust
Maturity
Established
Goal
Constrain browser resource loading and script execution with an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.
Result
Content-Security-Policy failed at "Find enforcing CSP delivery".
Validation steps
Find enforcing CSP delivery
Applicable HTML response is missing an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.
Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Find enforcing CSP delivery [fail]! Applicable HTML response is missing an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.INFOFind enforcing CSP deliveryINFORead CSP delivery headers enforcingHeader="missing" reportOnlyHeader="missing" metaPolicyCount=0 legacyHeadersPresent=[]FAILRequire enforcing Content-Security-Policy header actual="missing" expected="present" issue="Applicable HTML response is missing an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header."FAILApplicable HTML response is missing an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Frame protection
Frame protection failed at "Validate X-Frame-Options".
28 Fail
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Frame protection
Frame protection failed at "Validate X-Frame-Options".
Needs attention
Frame protection
Issue
X-Frame-Options is not DENY or SAMEORIGIN.
Why it matters
Frame protection blocks hostile sites from embedding pages in deceptive frames, reducing clickjacking and UI redressing risk.
Check name
Frame protection
Score
44/100
Status
fail
Category
Security & Trust
Maturity
Established
Goal
Prevent unwanted framing with an enforcing CSP frame-ancestors directive or a valid X-Frame-Options fallback.
Result
Frame protection failed at "Validate X-Frame-Options".
Validation steps
Validate CSP frame-ancestors
No enforcing CSP frame-ancestors directive is present.
Validate X-Frame-Options
X-Frame-Options is not DENY or SAMEORIGIN.
Review observed browser responses
One or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit valid frame protection.
Evidence log3 steps · 12 lines
Validate CSP frame-ancestors [warning]! No enforcing CSP frame-ancestors directive is present.INFOValidate CSP frame-ancestorsINFORead CSP frame-ancestors signals enforcingHeaderPresent=false reportOnlyHeaderPresent=false metaFrameAncestors=false policyCount=0 duplicateDirectives=[]WARNCompare effective frame-ancestors directive actual="missing" expected="valid restrictive enforcing frame-ancestors" issue="No enforcing CSP frame-ancestors directive is present."WARNNo enforcing CSP frame-ancestors directive is present.Validate X-Frame-Options [fail]! X-Frame-Options is not DENY or SAMEORIGIN.INFOValidate X-Frame-OptionsINFORead X-Frame-Options fallback value="SAMEORIGIN SAMEORIGIN" parsedValues=["SAMEORIGIN SAMEORIGIN"] normalizedValues=["sameorigin sameorigin"]FAILCompare X-Frame-Options value actual="invalid" expected="DENY or SAMEORIGIN" valid=false obsoleteAllowFrom=false duplicateOrConflicting=false issue="X-Frame-Options is not DENY or SAMEORIGIN."FAILX-Frame-Options is not DENY or SAMEORIGIN.Review observed browser responses [warning]! One or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit valid frame protection.INFOReview observed browser responsesINFOSample Chrome-observed same-origin responses observedResponseCount=18 sameOriginCount=7 htmlDocumentCount=1WARNCompare observed HTML frame protection actual={"missingOrInvalidFrameProtectionCount":1,"broadFrameAncestorsCount":0,"affected":[{"url":"https://imageshack.com/","status":200,"resourceType":"document","contentType":"text/html","contentSecurityPolicy":null,"contentSecurityPolicyReportOnly":null,"xFrameOptions":"SAMEORIGIN SAMEORIGIN"}]} expected="0 missing/invalid or broad same-origin HTML responses" issue="One or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit valid frame protection."WARNOne or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit valid frame protection.
Sign in to see 41 other issues and the full report
Create a free account to unlock every issue, evidence details, exports, and higher free limits.
Development Note:
Please configure GOOGLE_CLIENT_ID in .env to activate live login.
Fix with MCP or CLI
Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.
Score history
Public scan score over time
Public reports for this website origin. Select any point or report link to open that canonical report.
| Scan date | Score | Readiness | Report |
|---|---|---|---|
| 53/100 | Level 3, Bot-Aware | View report | |
| 53/100 | Level 3, Bot-Aware | Current report |