Export Report
OVERALL SCORE
Level 3, Bot-Aware
- AI Discoverability 65 out of 100
- Agent Ease of Use 59 out of 100
- Security & Trust 47 out of 100
- GEO, AIO and AEO 59 out of 100
- SEO 100 out of 100
- Performance 97 out of 100
- Accessibility 51 out of 100
What AI sees of your website
Notion Technologies® // Mobile App, SEO, Web Design Agency
We help startups and businesses create experience-rich mobile app, web and seo that bridge the gap between business and technology.
Next step
Turn this report into a fix workflow
2 failed checks are ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.
| Metric | Score | Status | Passed | Failed | Warning | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI Discoverability | 65 | Needs work | 30 | 2 | 2 | View details |
| Discoverability | 67 | Needs work | 8 | 0 | 0 | |
| Content Readiness | 67 | Needs work | 19 | 2 | 2 | View details |
| Bot Access Control | 63 | Needs work | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| Agent Ease of Use | 59 | Needs work | 6 | 2 | 1 | View details |
| Skill Discovery | 51 | Needs work | 3 | 2 | 1 | View details |
| Google Agentic Browsing | 100 | Strong | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| GEO, AIO and AEO | 59 | Needs work | 6 | 0 | 0 | |
| GEO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| AIO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| AEO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| SEO | 100 | Strong | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| SEO | 100 | Strong | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| Security & Trust | 47 | Priority fix | 9 | 2 | 2 | View details |
| Security & Trust | 47 | Priority fix | 9 | 2 | 2 | View details |
| Performance | 97 | Strong | 18 | 0 | 0 | |
| Performance | 97 | Strong | 18 | 0 | 0 |
Prioritized recommendations
Issues ranked by score impact
3 items need attention
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Author attribution
Author attribution is partially implemented.
75 Warning
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Author attribution
Author attribution is partially implemented.
Needs attention
Author attribution
Issue
No named author or publisher identity could be extracted.
Details
Why it matters
Author attribution helps agents cite content responsibly, assess source credibility, and distinguish editorial pages from anonymous marketing copy.
Check name
Author attribution
Score
25/100
Status
warning
Category
Content Readiness
Maturity
Established
Goal
Identify content authors or publishers for trust and attribution.
Result
Author attribution is partially implemented.
Validation steps
Schema.org attribution
Schema.org attribution is incomplete or relies only on publisher/fallback evidence.
Schema.org author attribution is missing or incomplete
Author identity quality
No named author or publisher identity could be extracted.
Author identity quality is incomplete
Visible byline parity
Structured author/publisher names were not found in visible byline text.
Author attribution does not match visible byline content
HTML attribution support
No supporting HTML author metadata, rel=author link, or visible byline was found.
HTML author attribution support is missing
Evidence log4 steps · 16 lines
Schema.org attribution [warning]! Schema.org attribution is incomplete or relies only on publisher/fallback evidence.INFOSchema.org attributionINFOChecking structured data for author, creator, and publisher contributorsWARNCheck named Schema.org author count actual=0 expected="> 0" authorCount=0 publisherCount=1 namedContributors=0 authors=[] publishers=[{"role":"publisher","id":"https://notiontechnologies.com/#organization","sameAs":[],"format":"json-ld","mergedName":false}] formats=["json-ld"]WARNSchema.org attribution is incomplete or fallback-only authorCount=0 publisherCount=1 authors=[] publishers=[{"role":"publisher","id":"https://notiontechnologies.com/#organization","sameAs":[],"format":"json-ld","mergedName":false}]Author identity quality [fail]! No named author or publisher identity could be extracted.INFOAuthor identity qualityINFOChecking contributors for stable identity signalsFAILCheck identified contributor count actual=0 expected="> 0" namedContributors=0 identifiedContributors=[] unidentifiedContributors=[{"role":"publisher","id":"https://notiontechnologies.com/#organization","sameAs":[],"format":"json-ld","mergedName":false}]FAILNo named contributor identity could be extractedVisible byline parity [fail]! Structured author/publisher names were not found in visible byline text.INFOVisible byline parityINFOComparing structured contributor names with visible byline evidenceFAILCheck visible attribution matches actual=0 expected="> 0 or visible byline present" visibleByline=false bylineCount=0FAILNo visible byline parity foundHTML attribution support [warning]! No supporting HTML author metadata, rel=author link, or visible byline was found.INFOHTML attribution supportINFOChecking meta author, rel=author, and visible byline supportWARNCheck HTML attribution support signals actual=0 expected="> 0" metaAuthor=false relAuthor=false visibleByline=falseWARNNo supporting HTML attribution signal found
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Content-Security-Policy
Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate fetch baseline".
50 Fail
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Content-Security-Policy
Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate fetch baseline".
Needs attention
Content-Security-Policy
Issue
CSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback.
Details
Why it matters
Content Security Policy reduces the impact of injection bugs by limiting where scripts, styles, frames, forms, and other browser resources can load or execute.
Check name
Content-Security-Policy
Score
50/100
Status
fail
Category
Security & Trust
Maturity
Established
Goal
Constrain browser resource loading and script execution with an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.
Result
Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate fetch baseline".
Validation steps
Evaluate fetch baseline
CSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback.
CSP fetch baseline is too broad or missing
Evaluate script execution
No script-src or default-src directive constrains script execution.
CSP script execution policy is unsafe
Review hardening directives
CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri.
CSP hardening directives are missing or weak
Review CSP reporting
CSP does not define a reporting endpoint.
CSP reporting is missing or incomplete
Evidence log4 steps · 16 lines
Evaluate fetch baseline [fail]! CSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback.INFOEvaluate fetch baselineINFOEvaluate resource loading fallback explicitFetchDirectives=[]FAILCompare fetch baseline actual="0 explicit fetch directives" expected="restricted default-src or broad explicit fetch coverage" issue="CSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback."FAILCSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback.Evaluate script execution [fail]! No script-src or default-src directive constrains script execution.INFOEvaluate script executionINFOInspect effective script directive FAILCompare script execution posture actual={"hasNonce":false,"hasHash":false,"hasStrictDynamic":false,"hasUnsafeInline":false,"hasUnsafeEval":false,"hasWildcardHost":false,"hasBroadScheme":false,"dangerousSchemes":[]} expected="constrained script sources without unsafe execution allowances" issue="No script-src or default-src directive constrains script execution."FAILNo script-src or default-src directive constrains script execution.Review hardening directives [warning]! CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri.INFOReview hardening directivesINFOInspect CSP hardening directives formCount=0WARNCompare recommended hardening coverage actual=["object-src","base-uri"] expected="no missing object-src/base-uri/form-action requirements" issue="CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri."WARNCSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri.Review CSP reporting [warning]! CSP does not define a reporting endpoint.INFOReview CSP reportingINFOInspect CSP reporting directives reportOnlyHeaderPresent=false reportOnlyDirectives=[]WARNCompare violation reporting configuration actual="no reporting endpoint" expected="report-to or report-uri present" issue="CSP does not define a reporting endpoint."WARNCSP does not define a reporting endpoint.
Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation
agents.json
agents.json failed at "Validate Wildcard schema shape".
45 Fail
Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation
agents.json
agents.json failed at "Validate Wildcard schema shape".
Needs attention
agents.json
Issue
agents.json does not match the expected Wildcard OpenAPI workflow shape.
Details
Why it matters
Wildcard agents.json gives agents workflow-level context beyond plain OpenAPI, including flows, links, examples, and API action structure. It is an emerging OpenAPI-adjacent proposal, so scanners should validate the contract shape without treating it as an A2A or IETF standard.
Check name
agents.json
Score
55/100
Status
fail
Category
Skill Discovery
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Publish a Wildcard-style agents.json file so agents can discover OpenAPI-backed workflows, links, examples, and authentication requirements.
Result
agents.json failed at "Validate Wildcard schema shape".
Validation steps
Validate Wildcard schema shape
agents.json does not match the expected Wildcard OpenAPI workflow shape.
agents.json schema shape is invalid or incomplete
Missing required fields
- flows[]
Validate flows and links
No executable flows were found.
agents.json flows or links are invalid
Review examples and LLM usability
Examples or descriptions are too thin for reliable agent argument generation.
agents.json examples or descriptions need improvement
Evidence log3 steps · 16 lines
Validate Wildcard schema shape [fail]! agents.json does not match the expected Wildcard OpenAPI workflow shape.INFOValidate Wildcard schema shapeINFOParse agents.json and classify contract shape shape="wildcard" version="1.0.0"FAILCompare contract shape actual="wildcard" expected="wildcard"FAILCompare missing required schema fields actual=["flows[]"] expected="none"FAILCompare Content-Type with JSON expectation actual=true expected=trueWARNSchema-shape warning warning="schema/spec version 1.0.0 is newer or different than the researched 0.1.x proposal"WARNSchema-shape warning warning="no examples were found for LLM argument generation"FAILagents.json does not match the expected Wildcard OpenAPI workflow shape.Validate flows and links [fail]! No executable flows were found.INFOValidate flows and linksFAILCompare workflow flow count actual=0 expected="> 0"FAILCompare operation link issues actual=0 expected=0FAILNo executable flows were found.Review examples and LLM usability [warning]! Examples or descriptions are too thin for reliable agent argument generation.INFOReview examples and LLM usabilityWARNCompare usable example count actual=0 expected="> 0 when actions are present"WARNLLM usability warning warning="no examples were found for LLM argument generation"WARNExamples or descriptions are too thin for reliable agent argument generation.
Sign in to see 33 other issues and the full report
Create a free account to unlock every issue, evidence details, exports, and higher free limits.
Fix with MCP or CLI
Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.
Score history