Export Report
OVERALL SCORE
Level 3, Bot-Aware
- AI Discoverability 53 out of 100
- Agent Ease of Use 59 out of 100
- Security & Trust 62 out of 100
- GEO, AIO and AEO 62 out of 100
- SEO 100 out of 100
- Performance 96 out of 100
- Accessibility 97 out of 100
What AI sees of your website
Communications Solutions - Networks and Applications | Oracle
Create new digital experiences with 5G and IoT business models. Let us show you how with our suite of cloud applications and network infrastructure solutions.
Next step
Turn this report into a fix workflow
2 failed checks are ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.
| Metric | Score | Status | Passed | Failed | Warning | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI Discoverability | 53 | Needs work | 27 | 0 | 0 | |
| Discoverability | 47 | Priority fix | 6 | 0 | 0 | |
| Content Readiness | 48 | Priority fix | 18 | 0 | 0 | |
| Bot Access Control | 63 | Needs work | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| Agent Ease of Use | 59 | Needs work | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| Google Agentic Browsing | 100 | Strong | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| GEO, AIO and AEO | 62 | Needs work | 8 | 0 | 0 | |
| GEO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| AIO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| AEO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| SEO | 100 | Strong | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| SEO | 100 | Strong | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| Security & Trust | 62 | Needs work | 16 | 3 | 3 | View details |
| Security & Trust | 62 | Needs work | 16 | 3 | 3 | View details |
| Performance | 96 | Strong | 15 | 1 | 0 | View details |
| Performance | 96 | Strong | 15 | 1 | 0 | View details |
Prioritized recommendations
Issues ranked by score impact
3 items need attention
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Content-Security-Policy
Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate fetch baseline".
25 Fail
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Content-Security-Policy
Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate fetch baseline".
Needs attention
Content-Security-Policy
Issue
CSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback.
Details
Why it matters
Content Security Policy reduces the impact of injection bugs by limiting where scripts, styles, frames, forms, and other browser resources can load or execute.
Check name
Content-Security-Policy
Score
50/100
Status
fail
Category
Security & Trust
Maturity
Established
Goal
Constrain browser resource loading and script execution with an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.
Result
Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate fetch baseline".
Validation steps
Evaluate fetch baseline
CSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback.
CSP fetch baseline is too broad or missing
Evaluate script execution
No script-src or default-src directive constrains script execution.
CSP script execution policy is unsafe
Review hardening directives
CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri, form-action.
CSP hardening directives are missing or weak
Review CSP reporting
CSP does not define a reporting endpoint.
CSP reporting is missing or incomplete
Evidence log4 steps · 16 lines
Evaluate fetch baseline [fail]! CSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback.INFOEvaluate fetch baselineINFOEvaluate resource loading fallback explicitFetchDirectives=[]FAILCompare fetch baseline actual="0 explicit fetch directives" expected="restricted default-src or broad explicit fetch coverage" issue="CSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback."FAILCSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback.Evaluate script execution [fail]! No script-src or default-src directive constrains script execution.INFOEvaluate script executionINFOInspect effective script directive FAILCompare script execution posture actual={"hasNonce":false,"hasHash":false,"hasStrictDynamic":false,"hasUnsafeInline":false,"hasUnsafeEval":false,"hasWildcardHost":false,"hasBroadScheme":false,"dangerousSchemes":[]} expected="constrained script sources without unsafe execution allowances" issue="No script-src or default-src directive constrains script execution."FAILNo script-src or default-src directive constrains script execution.Review hardening directives [warning]! CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri, form-action.INFOReview hardening directivesINFOInspect CSP hardening directives frameAncestors=["'self'","https://www.oracle.eu","https://oracle.eu","https://my.oracle.com","https://eeho.fa.us2.oraclecloud.com","https://blogs.oracle.com","*.khapps.com","*.khapps.jp","*.lsapps.oracle.com","*.lsapps.oracle.jp","*.dev-lsapps.oracle.com","https://oraclesso.sharepoint.com","https://oracle.sharepoint.com","https://partners.oracle.com","https://partners-stage.oracle.com","https://partners-test.oracle.com","https://partners-sit.oracle.com","https://partners-dev.oracle.com"] formCount=1WARNCompare recommended hardening coverage actual=["object-src","base-uri","form-action"] expected="no missing object-src/base-uri/form-action requirements" issue="CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri, form-action."WARNCSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri, form-action.Review CSP reporting [warning]! CSP does not define a reporting endpoint.INFOReview CSP reportingINFOInspect CSP reporting directives reportOnlyHeaderPresent=false reportOnlyDirectives=[]WARNCompare violation reporting configuration actual="no reporting endpoint" expected="report-to or report-uri present" issue="CSP does not define a reporting endpoint."WARNCSP does not define a reporting endpoint.
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Frame protection
Frame protection failed at "Validate CSP frame-ancestors".
20 Fail
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Frame protection
Frame protection failed at "Validate CSP frame-ancestors".
Needs attention
Frame protection
Issue
frame-ancestors contains invalid source expressions: *.khapps.com, *.khapps.jp, *.lsapps.oracle.com, *.lsapps.oracle.jp, *.dev-lsapps.oracle.com.
Details
Why it matters
Frame protection blocks hostile sites from embedding pages in deceptive frames, reducing clickjacking and UI redressing risk.
Check name
Frame protection
Score
60/100
Status
fail
Category
Security & Trust
Maturity
Established
Goal
Prevent unwanted framing with an enforcing CSP frame-ancestors directive or a valid X-Frame-Options fallback.
Result
Frame protection failed at "Validate CSP frame-ancestors".
Validation steps
Validate CSP frame-ancestors
frame-ancestors contains invalid source expressions: *.khapps.com, *.khapps.jp, *.lsapps.oracle.com, *.lsapps.oracle.jp, *.dev-lsapps.oracle.com.
CSP frame-ancestors is missing or ineffective
Review CSP and XFO interaction
CSP frame-ancestors controls modern browser behavior, but the X-Frame-Options fallback is invalid or conflicting.
CSP and X-Frame-Options conflict or leave legacy gaps
Evidence log2 steps · 8 lines
Validate CSP frame-ancestors [fail]! frame-ancestors contains invalid source expressions: *.khapps.com, *.khapps.jp, *.lsapps.oracle.com, *.lsapps.oracle.jp, *.dev-lsapps.oracle.com.INFOValidate CSP frame-ancestorsINFORead CSP frame-ancestors signals enforcingHeaderPresent=true reportOnlyHeaderPresent=false metaFrameAncestors=false policyCount=1 duplicateDirectives=[]FAILCompare effective frame-ancestors directive actual={"values":["'self'","https://www.oracle.eu","https://oracle.eu","https://my.oracle.com","https://eeho.fa.us2.oraclecloud.com","https://blogs.oracle.com","*.khapps.com","*.khapps.jp","*.lsapps.oracle.com","*.lsapps.oracle.jp","*.dev-lsapps.oracle.com","https://oraclesso.sharepoint.com","https://oracle.sharepoint.com","https://partners.oracle.com","https://partners-stage.oracle.com","https://partners-test.oracle.com","https://partners-sit.oracle.com","https://partners-dev.oracle.com"],"mode":"malformed","valid":false,"restrictive":false,"broadSources":[]} expected="valid restrictive enforcing frame-ancestors" issue="frame-ancestors contains invalid source expressions: *.khapps.com, *.khapps.jp, *.lsapps.oracle.com, *.lsapps.oracle.jp, *.dev-lsapps.oracle.com."FAILframe-ancestors contains invalid source expressions: *.khapps.com, *.khapps.jp, *.lsapps.oracle.com, *.lsapps.oracle.jp, *.dev-lsapps.oracle.com.Review CSP and XFO interaction [warning]! CSP frame-ancestors controls modern browser behavior, but the X-Frame-Options fallback is invalid or conflicting.INFOReview CSP and XFO interactionINFOCompare modern CSP and legacy XFO behavior modernBrowserMechanism="csp-frame-ancestors" cspOverridesXfo=true cspMode="malformed" xfoDirective="sameorigin"WARNCheck CSP/XFO policy alignment actual="aligned or single mechanism" expected="no conflicting framing policy" issue="CSP frame-ancestors controls modern browser behavior, but the X-Frame-Options fallback is invalid or conflicting."WARNCSP frame-ancestors controls modern browser behavior, but the X-Frame-Options fallback is invalid or conflicting.
PerformancePerformanceBrowser audit
Forced reflow
100 Fail
PerformancePerformanceBrowser audit
Forced reflow
Check name
Forced reflow
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Device
desktop
Category
Performance
Fix guidance
A forced reflow occurs when JavaScript queries geometric properties (such as offsetWidth) after styles have been invalidated by a change to the DOM state. This can result in poor performance. Learn more about [forced reflows](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/forced-reflow) and possible mitigations.
References
web.dev/learn/performanceEvidence
{
"description": "A forced reflow occurs when JavaScript queries geometric properties (such as offsetWidth) after styles have been invalidated by a change to the DOM state. This can result in poor performance. Learn more about [forced reflows](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/forced-reflow) and possible mitigations."
}Sign in to see 34 other issues and the full report
Create a free account to unlock every issue, evidence details, exports, and higher free limits.
Fix with MCP or CLI
Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.
Score history
Public scan score over time
Public reports for this website origin. Select any point or report link to open that canonical report.
| Scan date | Score | Readiness | Report |
|---|---|---|---|
| 53/100 | Level 3, Bot-Aware | View report | |
| 55/100 | Level 3, Bot-Aware | View report | |
| 55/100 | Level 3, Bot-Aware | View report | |
| 67/100 | Level 3, Bot-Aware | View report | |
| 64/100 | Level 3, Bot-Aware | View report | |
| 68/100 | Level 3, Bot-Aware | View report | |
| 68/100 | Level 3, Bot-Aware | Current report |