Export Report
OVERALL SCORE
Level 3, Bot-Aware
- AI Discoverability 71 out of 100
- Agent Ease of Use 51 out of 100
- Security & Trust 92 out of 100
- GEO, AIO and AEO 67 out of 100
- SEO 100 out of 100
- Performance and Accessibility 96 out of 100
What AI sees of your website
Ownkube - Ship at lightning speed. On your own cloud.
Developer platform in your own AWS account. Named agents (Cost, Incident, Scaling, Security) run your ops. Free Starter tier on one AWS instance.
Next step
Turn this report into a fix workflow
5 failed checks are ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.
| Metric | Score | Status | Passed | Failed | Warning | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI Discoverability | 71 | Needs work | 39 | 7 | 5 | View details |
| Discoverability | 67 | Needs work | 8 | 2 | 0 | View details |
| Content Readiness | 69 | Needs work | 26 | 5 | 3 | View details |
| Bot Access Control | 75 | Mostly ready | 5 | 0 | 2 | |
| Agent Ease of Use | 51 | Needs work | 2 | 1 | 9 | View details |
| Auth | 48 | Priority fix | 1 | 1 | 2 | View details |
| MCP | 50 | Needs work | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| Skill Discovery | 54 | Needs work | 1 | 0 | 4 | |
| GEO, AIO and AEO | 67 | Needs work | 8 | 1 | 9 | View details |
| GEO Readiness | 64 | Needs work | 2 | 0 | 4 | |
| AIO Readiness | 85 | Mostly ready | 4 | 0 | 2 | |
| AEO Readiness | 51 | Needs work | 2 | 1 | 3 | View details |
| SEO | 100 | Strong | 9 | 0 | 0 | |
| SEO | 100 | Strong | 9 | 0 | 0 | |
| Security & Trust | 92 | Strong | 23 | 0 | 5 | |
| Security & Trust | 92 | Strong | 23 | 0 | 5 | |
| Performance and Accessibility | 96 | Strong | 23 | 3 | 0 | View details |
| Performance | 97 | Strong | 18 | 2 | 0 | View details |
| Accessibility | 95 | Strong | 5 | 1 | 0 | View details |
Prioritized recommendations
Issues ranked by score impact
32 items need attention
AI DiscoverabilityDiscoverabilityEstablished
Link headers
Link headers failed at "Find useful Link headers".
100 Fail
AI DiscoverabilityDiscoverabilityEstablished
Link headers
Link headers failed at "Find useful Link headers".
Needs attention
Link headers
Issue
No useful agent discovery Link headers were found.
Why it matters
Link headers let automated clients discover API catalogs, documentation, and machine-readable alternates without parsing page markup first.
Check name
Link headers
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Category
Discoverability
Maturity
Established
Goal
Include Link response headers for agent discovery using RFC 8288.
Result
Link headers failed at "Find useful Link headers".
Validation steps
Find useful Link headers
No useful agent discovery Link headers were found.
Fetch same-origin Link header targets
Link headers did not expose any same-origin targets to validate.
Evidence log2 steps · 15 lines
Find useful Link headers [fail]! No useful agent discovery Link headers were found.INFOFind useful Link headersINFOParse response Link header linkCount=6FAILCompare registered agent-useful relation count actual=0 expected="> 0"FAILCompare community relation count actual=0 expected="accepted as weaker evidence"INFOIgnored non-discovery Link relation rel="sitemap" url="/sitemap-index.xml"INFOIgnored non-discovery Link relation rel="alternate" url="/index.md"INFOIgnored non-discovery Link relation rel="alternate" url="/llms.txt"INFOIgnored non-discovery Link relation rel="alternate" url="/llms-full.txt"INFOIgnored non-discovery Link relation rel="describedby" url="/robots.txt"INFOIgnored non-discovery Link relation rel="alternate" url="/llms.txt"FAILNo useful agent discovery Link headers were found.Fetch same-origin Link header targets [fail]! Link headers did not expose any same-origin targets to validate.INFOFetch same-origin Link header targetsINFOFetch same-origin Link header targets and record external skipsFAILCompare same-origin Link target failures actual=1 expected=0FAILLink headers did not expose any same-origin targets to validate.
Agent Ease of UseMCPEmerging recommendation
MCP Server Card
MCP Server Card has a validation warning at "Discover MCP server card".
25 Warning
Agent Ease of UseMCPEmerging recommendation
MCP Server Card
MCP Server Card has a validation warning at "Discover MCP server card".
Needs attention
MCP Server Card
Issue
No MCP server card was found at current, transitional, or linked discovery paths.
Why it matters
MCP server cards give agents a stable, public pre-connection discovery surface for server identity, remote transports, protocol compatibility, and safe routing without guessing endpoints.
Check name
MCP Server Card
Score
50/100
Status
warning
Category
MCP
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Publish an MCP Server Card that helps agents discover remote MCP server transports before opening a session.
Result
MCP Server Card has a validation warning at "Discover MCP server card".
Validation steps
Discover MCP server card
No MCP server card was found at current, transitional, or linked discovery paths.
Evidence log1 step · 14 lines
Discover MCP server card [warning]! No MCP server card was found at current, transitional, or linked discovery paths.INFODiscover MCP server card candidateCount=5INFOBuild MCP server-card candidate list currentPath="/.well-known/mcp-server-card" transitionalPaths=["/.well-known/mcp/server-card.json","/.well-known/mcp/server-cards.json","/mcp.json","/.well-known/mcp.json"] linkedPaths=[]PASSCheck whether page claims MCP support actual=false expected="true only when HTML or Link headers mention MCP" textMatches=[] headerLinkCount=0INFOTrying to fetch /.well-known/mcp-server-card url="https://ownkube.io/.well-known/mcp-server-card" source="current"FAIL/.well-known/mcp-server-card did not return a usable server card statusCode=404 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8"INFOTrying to fetch /.well-known/mcp/server-card.json url="https://ownkube.io/.well-known/mcp/server-card.json" source="transitional"FAIL/.well-known/mcp/server-card.json did not return a usable server card statusCode=404 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8"INFOTrying to fetch /.well-known/mcp/server-cards.json url="https://ownkube.io/.well-known/mcp/server-cards.json" source="transitional"FAIL/.well-known/mcp/server-cards.json did not return a usable server card statusCode=404 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8"INFOTrying to fetch /mcp.json url="https://ownkube.io/mcp.json" source="transitional"FAIL/mcp.json did not return a usable server card statusCode=404 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8"INFOTrying to fetch /.well-known/mcp.json url="https://ownkube.io/.well-known/mcp.json" source="transitional"FAIL/.well-known/mcp.json did not return a usable server card statusCode=404 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8"WARNNo MCP server card was found reason="No MCP server card was found at current, transitional, or linked discovery paths."AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEmerging recommendation
RSL license signal
No RSL declarations were found.
25 Warning
AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEmerging recommendation
RSL license signal
No RSL declarations were found.
Needs attention
RSL license signal
Issue
No RSL declarations were found.
Why it matters
Really Simple Licensing is an emerging rights-expression layer for communicating content usage and licensing terms separately from robots.txt crawl permission.
Check name
RSL license signal
Score
50/100
Status
warning
Category
Bot Access Control
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Declare machine-readable content licensing terms for compliant AI and crawler systems when the site needs them.
Result
No RSL declarations were found.
Validation steps
Discover RSL declarations
No RSL declarations were found.
Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Discover RSL declarations [warning]! No RSL declarations were found.INFODiscover RSL declarationsINFOChecking robots.txt License records, HTTP Link rel=license headers, HTML license links, and inline RSL XML robotsFound=trueSKIPCount discovered RSL declarations actual=0 expected=">= 1 when RSL licensing terms are published" sources={}WARNNo RSL declarations were found on any supported discovery surface.AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEmerging recommendation
TDMRep declaration
No TDMRep declaration was found.
25 Warning
AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEmerging recommendation
TDMRep declaration
No TDMRep declaration was found.
Needs attention
TDMRep declaration
Issue
No TDMRep declaration was found at /.well-known/tdmrep.json.
Why it matters
TDMRep is a W3C Community Group protocol and IANA-registered well-known URI for declaring text and data mining reservation policy on applicable content.
Check name
TDMRep declaration
Score
50/100
Status
warning
Category
Bot Access Control
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Publish a machine-readable text and data mining reservation declaration and verifiable ODRL policy when the site needs one.
Result
No TDMRep declaration was found.
Validation steps
Fetch /.well-known/tdmrep.json
No TDMRep declaration was found at /.well-known/tdmrep.json.
Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Fetch /.well-known/tdmrep.json [warning]! No TDMRep declaration was found at /.well-known/tdmrep.json.INFOFetch /.well-known/tdmrep.jsonINFORequesting origin-level TDMRep declaration at /.well-known/tdmrep.jsonWARNCompare TDMRep file response actual=404 expected="2xx with JSON array when origin-level TDMRep is published" contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8" length=27018WARNNo TDMRep declaration was found at /.well-known/tdmrep.json. Agent Ease of UseMCPEmerging recommendation
WebMCP
WebMCP has a validation warning at "Probe WebMCP operability".
25 Warning
Agent Ease of UseMCPEmerging recommendation
WebMCP
WebMCP has a validation warning at "Probe WebMCP operability".
Needs attention
WebMCP
Issue
No WebMCP surface was found to probe.
Details
Why it matters
WebMCP gives agents structured page and browser tool hints so they can understand actions without relying only on screen scraping.
Check name
WebMCP
Score
50/100
Status
warning
Category
MCP
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Expose browser/page WebMCP tools and compatible static WebMCP metadata when a site wants agents to understand in-page actions.
Result
WebMCP has a validation warning at "Probe WebMCP operability".
Validation steps
Detect WebMCP runtime API
Expose current WebMCP tools through document.modelContext.registerTool(), or clearly document navigator.modelContext as a compatibility/polyfill profile.
Probe WebMCP operability
No WebMCP surface was found to probe.
WebMCP operability findings
- No WebMCP surface was found to probe.
- Conventional WebMCP manifest paths were checked but did not return a valid manifest.
Validate declarative WebMCP form tools
No W3C-style declarative WebMCP form attributes were found.
Validate MCP-aware HTML annotations
No data-mcp-tool or hyphenated WebMCP compatibility annotations were found.
Validate static WebMCP JSON compatibility
No static WebMCP JSON manifest or WMCP interaction graph was found.
Validate WebMCP tool metadata quality
Use clear tool names, useful descriptions, constrained schemas, side-effect clarity, and profile-appropriate naming.
Review WebMCP security and policy signals
Remove secrets and prompt-injection text from WebMCP metadata, avoid private endpoints, and use Permissions-Policy and annotations for tool safety.
Evidence log7 steps · 32 lines
Detect WebMCP runtime API [informational]INFODetect WebMCP runtime API status="informational"INFOProbe rendered browser for WebMCP runtime objects SKIPCheck current W3C runtime API actual="not detected" expected="document.modelContext/registerTool available"INFOWebMCP evidence was recorded for context. status="informational"Probe WebMCP operability [warning]! No WebMCP surface was found to probe.INFOProbe WebMCP operability status="warning"INFORun safe WebMCP operability checks safeProbeOnly=trueWARNCheck usable WebMCP evidence actual=0 expected="at least 1 usable runtime, declarative, annotation, or static manifest signal"WARNWebMCP operability warning warning="No WebMCP surface was found to probe."WARNWebMCP operability warning warning="Conventional WebMCP manifest paths were checked but did not return a valid manifest."WARNNo WebMCP surface was found to probe.Validate declarative WebMCP form tools [informational]! No W3C-style declarative WebMCP form attributes were found.INFOValidate declarative WebMCP form tools status="informational"INFOInspect visible forms and controls for current declarative WebMCP attributes annotatedElements=0 formsWithAttributes=0 controlsWithAttributes=0SKIPValidate declarative WebMCP attribute quality actual=0 expected=0INFONo W3C-style declarative WebMCP form attributes were found. status="informational"Validate MCP-aware HTML annotations [informational]! No data-mcp-tool or hyphenated WebMCP compatibility annotations were found.INFOValidate MCP-aware HTML annotations status="informational"INFOInspect HTML for MCP compatibility annotations compatibilityAttributeCount=0 dataMcpToolCount=0 examples=[]SKIPValidate compatibility annotation quality actual=0 expected=0INFONo data-mcp-tool or hyphenated WebMCP compatibility annotations were found. status="informational"Validate static WebMCP JSON compatibility [warning]! No static WebMCP JSON manifest or WMCP interaction graph was found.INFOValidate static WebMCP JSON compatibility status="warning"INFODiscover static WebMCP manifest candidates conventionalPaths=["/.well-known/webmcp.json","/webmcp.json"] checkedCount=2 profileCounts={}INFOWebMCP manifest candidate checked source="path" path="/.well-known/webmcp.json" url="https://ownkube.io/.well-known/webmcp.json" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8"INFOWebMCP manifest candidate checked source="path" path="/webmcp.json" url="https://ownkube.io/webmcp.json" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8"WARNValidate discovered static WebMCP metadata actual={"validManifestCount":0,"invalidManifestCount":0,"toolCount":0,"wmcpActionCount":0} expected="at least 1 valid tools[] manifest or WMCP graph when static metadata is present"WARNNo static WebMCP JSON manifest or WMCP interaction graph was found.Validate WebMCP tool metadata quality [informational]INFOValidate WebMCP tool metadata quality status="informational"INFOInspect WebMCP tool names, descriptions, schemas, and safety hints toolCount=0SKIPCheck tool metadata findings actual={"issueCount":0,"warningCount":0} expected="0 issues and 0 warnings"INFOWebMCP evidence was recorded for context. status="informational"Review WebMCP security and policy signals [informational]INFOReview WebMCP security and policy signals status="informational"INFOInspect WebMCP security and policy signals permissionsPolicy="camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=(), interest-cohort=()" failureCount=0 warningCount=0PASSCheck security findings actual={"failures":0,"warnings":0} expected="0 failures and 0 warnings"INFOWebMCP evidence was recorded for context. status="informational"
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Author attribution
Author attribution is partially implemented.
24 Fail
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Author attribution
Author attribution is partially implemented.
Needs attention
Author attribution
Issue
Applicable editorial content has no usable author, creator, publisher, visible byline, or HTML attribution signal.
Why it matters
Author attribution helps agents cite content responsibly, assess source credibility, and distinguish editorial pages from anonymous marketing copy.
Check name
Author attribution
Score
5/100
Status
fail
Category
Content Readiness
Maturity
Established
Goal
Identify content authors or publishers for trust and attribution.
Result
Author attribution is partially implemented.
Validation steps
Schema.org attribution
Editorial content has no Schema.org author, creator, or publisher attribution.
Author identity quality
No named author or publisher identity could be extracted.
Visible byline parity
Structured author/publisher names were not found in visible byline text.
HTML attribution support
No supporting HTML author metadata, rel=author link, or visible byline was found.
Evidence log4 steps · 16 lines
Schema.org attribution [fail]! Editorial content has no Schema.org author, creator, or publisher attribution.INFOSchema.org attributionINFOChecking structured data for author, creator, and publisher contributorsFAILCheck named Schema.org author count actual=0 expected="> 0" authorCount=0 publisherCount=0 namedContributors=0 authors=[] publishers=[] formats=[]FAILNo Schema.org author, creator, or publisher attribution foundAuthor identity quality [fail]! No named author or publisher identity could be extracted.INFOAuthor identity qualityINFOChecking contributors for stable identity signalsFAILCheck identified contributor count actual=0 expected="> 0" namedContributors=0 identifiedContributors=[] unidentifiedContributors=[]FAILNo named contributor identity could be extractedVisible byline parity [fail]! Structured author/publisher names were not found in visible byline text.INFOVisible byline parityINFOComparing structured contributor names with visible byline evidenceFAILCheck visible attribution matches actual=0 expected="> 0 or visible byline present" visibleByline=false bylineCount=0FAILNo visible byline parity foundHTML attribution support [warning]! No supporting HTML author metadata, rel=author link, or visible byline was found.INFOHTML attribution supportINFOChecking meta author, rel=author, and visible byline supportWARNCheck HTML attribution support signals actual=0 expected="> 0" metaAuthor=false relAuthor=false visibleByline=falseWARNNo supporting HTML attribution signal found
Agent Ease of UseAuthEstablished
OAuth / OIDC discovery
OAuth / OIDC discovery failed at "Fetch discovery metadata".
19 Fail
Agent Ease of UseAuthEstablished
OAuth / OIDC discovery
OAuth / OIDC discovery failed at "Fetch discovery metadata".
Needs attention
OAuth / OIDC discovery
Issue
OAuth/OIDC was claimed or referenced, but no registered OAuth/OIDC discovery document was found.
Why it matters
OAuth and OIDC discovery let agents and API clients find authorization, token, and key endpoints programmatically instead of scraping login pages or guessing provider setup.
Check name
OAuth / OIDC discovery
Score
43/100
Status
fail
Category
Auth
Maturity
Established
Goal
Publish OAuth/OIDC discovery metadata only when the site operates or advertises a real OAuth/OIDC authorization server.
Result
OAuth / OIDC discovery failed at "Fetch discovery metadata".
Validation steps
Fetch discovery metadata
OAuth/OIDC was claimed or referenced, but no registered OAuth/OIDC discovery document was found.
Evidence log1 step · 6 lines
Fetch discovery metadata [fail]! OAuth/OIDC was claimed or referenced, but no registered OAuth/OIDC discovery document was found.INFOFetch discovery metadataINFOTrying OAuth/OIDC well-known metadata candidates checkedCount=2INFOChecked discovery candidate path="/.well-known/openid-configuration" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8" length=27018INFOChecked discovery candidate path="/.well-known/oauth-authorization-server" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8" length=27018FAILCheck discovery metadata fetch succeeded actual=2 expected="HTTP 2xx JSON metadata document"FAILFetch discovery metadata failed issue="OAuth/OIDC was claimed or referenced, but no registered OAuth/OIDC discovery document was found."Agent Ease of UseAuthEmerging recommendation
Auth.md Agent Registration
Auth.md Agent Registration has a validation warning at "Warn when auth surface lacks Auth.md".
17 Warning
Agent Ease of UseAuthEmerging recommendation
Auth.md Agent Registration
Auth.md Agent Registration has a validation warning at "Warn when auth surface lacks Auth.md".
Needs attention
Auth.md Agent Registration
Issue
The site appears to support login, signup, account access, or credentials but does not publish /auth.md.
Why it matters
Human login and signup flows are often opaque to agents. Auth.md gives automated clients a stable registration contract instead of forcing them to scrape docs, automate browser forms, or guess credential flows.
Check name
Auth.md Agent Registration
Score
50/100
Status
warning
Category
Auth
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Publish Auth.md v1 metadata so agents can discover how to register, claim a user, and obtain credentials.
Result
Auth.md Agent Registration has a validation warning at "Warn when auth surface lacks Auth.md".
Validation steps
Warn when auth surface lacks Auth.md
The site appears to support login, signup, account access, or credentials but does not publish /auth.md.
Evidence log1 step · 2 lines
Warn when auth surface lacks Auth.md [warning]! The site appears to support login, signup, account access, or credentials but does not publish /auth.md.INFOWarn when auth surface lacks Auth.mdWARNThe site appears to support login, signup, account access, or credentials but does not publish /auth.md.Agent Ease of UseAuthEmerging recommendation
OAuth Protected Resource
OAuth Protected Resource has a validation warning at "Detect protected-resource applicability".
17 Warning
Agent Ease of UseAuthEmerging recommendation
OAuth Protected Resource
OAuth Protected Resource has a validation warning at "Detect protected-resource applicability".
Needs attention
OAuth Protected Resource
Issue
Generic authentication signals were found, but no OAuth Protected Resource metadata signal was detected.
Why it matters
Protected-resource metadata tells agents which API/resource is locked, which authorization servers can issue tokens for it, and how a 401 challenge maps back to the correct resource.
Check name
OAuth Protected Resource
Score
50/100
Status
warning
Category
Auth
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Publish OAuth Protected Resource Metadata for OAuth-protected APIs and MCP resources so clients can identify the resource and its authorization servers.
Result
OAuth Protected Resource has a validation warning at "Detect protected-resource applicability".
Validation steps
Detect protected-resource applicability
Generic authentication signals were found, but no OAuth Protected Resource metadata signal was detected.
Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Detect protected-resource applicability [warning]! Generic authentication signals were found, but no OAuth Protected Resource metadata signal was detected.INFODetect protected-resource applicabilityINFOInspecting auth headers, MCP/OAuth claims, and protected-resource hints applies=false requiresAuthorizationServers=false signalsCount=0 genericAuthSignalsCount=2 checkedCount=1WARNCheck protected-resource metadata applicability actual=false expected="true when RFC 9728 metadata exists or support is claimed" checked=[{"url":"https://ownkube.io/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource","path":"/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource","source":"root-well-known","resourceIdentifier":"https://ownkube.io","statusCode":404,"contentType":"text/html; charset=utf-8","length":27018}]WARNDetect protected-resource applicability completed with warnings issue="Generic authentication signals were found, but no OAuth Protected Resource metadata signal was detected."Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation
A2A Agent Card
A2A Agent Card has a validation warning at "Discover A2A Agent Card".
13 Warning
Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation
A2A Agent Card
A2A Agent Card has a validation warning at "Discover A2A Agent Card".
Needs attention
A2A Agent Card
Issue
No A2A Agent Card was found at the current, legacy, or fallback discovery paths.
Why it matters
A2A Agent Cards provide protocol-specific discovery for agent identity, skills, input and output modes, transport bindings, capabilities, and security requirements. Legacy A2A also used /.well-known/agent.json, so scanners must classify the card shape before reporting readiness.
Check name
A2A Agent Card
Score
50/100
Status
warning
Category
Skill Discovery
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Publish a version-appropriate A2A Agent Card so A2A-compatible clients can discover agent skills and invoke the declared endpoint safely.
Result
A2A Agent Card has a validation warning at "Discover A2A Agent Card".
Validation steps
Discover A2A Agent Card
No A2A Agent Card was found at the current, legacy, or fallback discovery paths.
Evidence log1 step · 8 lines
Discover A2A Agent Card [warning]! No A2A Agent Card was found at the current, legacy, or fallback discovery paths.INFODiscover A2A Agent CardINFOTry A2A discovery paths in priority order paths=["/.well-known/agent-card.json","/.well-known/agent.json","/agent-card.json","/.well-known/a2a/agent-card.json"]WARNA2A candidate path did not return a usable card path="/.well-known/agent-card.json" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8"WARNA2A candidate path did not return a usable card path="/.well-known/agent.json" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8"WARNA2A candidate path did not return a usable card path="/agent-card.json" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8"WARNA2A candidate path did not return a usable card path="/.well-known/a2a/agent-card.json" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8"WARNNo A2A Agent Card candidate was selectedWARNNo A2A Agent Card was found at the current, legacy, or fallback discovery paths.Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation
Agent Skills index
Agent Skills index has a validation warning at "Discover Agent Skills index".
13 Warning
Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation
Agent Skills index
Agent Skills index has a validation warning at "Discover Agent Skills index".
Needs attention
Agent Skills index
Issue
No Agent Skills discovery index was found at the canonical or legacy path.
Why it matters
An Agent Skills index lets agents discover task-specific instructions through a small trusted index, then verify and load only the skill artifacts they need.
Check name
Agent Skills index
Score
50/100
Status
warning
Category
Skill Discovery
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Publish an Agent Skills discovery index that advertises digest-pinned SKILL.md or archive artifacts.
Result
Agent Skills index has a validation warning at "Discover Agent Skills index".
Validation steps
Discover Agent Skills index
No Agent Skills discovery index was found at the canonical or legacy path.
Evidence log1 step · 5 lines
Discover Agent Skills index [warning]! No Agent Skills discovery index was found at the canonical or legacy path.INFODiscover Agent Skills indexINFOTry Agent Skills index paths in priority order paths=["/.well-known/agent-skills/index.json","/.well-known/skills/index.json"]WARNAgent Skills index candidate was not usable path="/.well-known/agent-skills/index.json" url="https://ownkube.io/.well-known/agent-skills/index.json" statusCode=404WARNAgent Skills index candidate was not usable path="/.well-known/skills/index.json" url="https://ownkube.io/.well-known/skills/index.json" statusCode=404WARNNo Agent Skills discovery index was found at the canonical or legacy path.Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation
agents.json
agents.json has a validation warning at "Discover agents.json".
13 Warning
Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation
agents.json
agents.json has a validation warning at "Discover agents.json".
Needs attention
agents.json
Issue
No Wildcard-style agents.json file was found.
Why it matters
Wildcard agents.json gives agents workflow-level context beyond plain OpenAPI, including flows, links, examples, and API action structure. It is an emerging OpenAPI-adjacent proposal, so scanners should validate the contract shape without treating it as an A2A or IETF standard.
Check name
agents.json
Score
50/100
Status
warning
Category
Skill Discovery
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Publish a Wildcard-style agents.json file so agents can discover OpenAPI-backed workflows, links, examples, and authentication requirements.
Result
agents.json has a validation warning at "Discover agents.json".
Validation steps
Discover agents.json
No Wildcard-style agents.json file was found.
Evidence log1 step · 6 lines
Discover agents.json [warning]! No Wildcard-style agents.json file was found.INFODiscover agents.jsonINFOTry agents.json discovery paths in priority order paths=["/.well-known/agents.json","/agents.json"]WARNagents.json candidate path did not return a usable contract path="/.well-known/agents.json" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8"WARNagents.json candidate path did not return a usable contract path="/agents.json" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8"WARNNo agents.json candidate was selectedWARNNo Wildcard-style agents.json file was found.Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Content-Security-Policy
Content-Security-Policy has a validation warning at "Evaluate script execution".
11 Warning
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Content-Security-Policy
Content-Security-Policy has a validation warning at "Evaluate script execution".
Needs attention
Content-Security-Policy
Issue
script-src allows unsafe-inline without nonce or hash controls.
Why it matters
Content Security Policy reduces the impact of injection bugs by limiting where scripts, styles, frames, forms, and other browser resources can load or execute.
Check name
Content-Security-Policy
Score
78/100
Status
warning
Category
Security & Trust
Maturity
Established
Goal
Constrain browser resource loading and script execution with an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.
Result
Content-Security-Policy has a validation warning at "Evaluate script execution".
Validation steps
Evaluate script execution
script-src allows unsafe-inline without nonce or hash controls.
Review hardening directives
CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src.
Review CSP reporting
CSP does not define a reporting endpoint.
Evidence log3 steps · 12 lines
Evaluate script execution [warning]! script-src allows unsafe-inline without nonce or hash controls.INFOEvaluate script executionINFOInspect effective script directive effectiveDirective="script-src" sources=["'self'","'unsafe-inline'","https://www.googletagmanager.com","https://www.google-analytics.com"]WARNCompare script execution posture actual={"hasNonce":false,"hasHash":false,"hasStrictDynamic":false,"hasUnsafeInline":true,"hasUnsafeEval":false,"hasWildcardHost":false,"hasBroadScheme":false,"dangerousSchemes":[]} expected="constrained script sources without unsafe execution allowances" issue="script-src allows unsafe-inline without nonce or hash controls."WARNscript-src allows unsafe-inline without nonce or hash controls.Review hardening directives [warning]! CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src.INFOReview hardening directivesINFOInspect CSP hardening directives objectSrcFallback=["'self'"] baseUri=["'self'"] formAction=["'self'"] frameAncestors=["'none'"] formCount=0WARNCompare recommended hardening coverage actual=["object-src"] expected="no missing object-src/base-uri/form-action requirements" issue="CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src."WARNCSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src.Review CSP reporting [warning]! CSP does not define a reporting endpoint.INFOReview CSP reportingINFOInspect CSP reporting directives reportOnlyHeaderPresent=false reportOnlyDirectives=[]WARNCompare violation reporting configuration actual="no reporting endpoint" expected="report-to or report-uri present" issue="CSP does not define a reporting endpoint."WARNCSP does not define a reporting endpoint.
Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation
DNS-AID Agent Discovery
DNS-AID Agent Discovery has a validation warning at "Query DNS-AID records".
9 Warning
Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation
DNS-AID Agent Discovery
DNS-AID Agent Discovery has a validation warning at "Query DNS-AID records".
Needs attention
DNS-AID Agent Discovery
Issue
No DNS-AID HTTPS/SVCB records were found under _agents.
Why it matters
DNS-AID lets agents discover index, A2A, and other agent entrypoints before fetching HTTP metadata. HTTPS/SVCB records provide the service-binding substrate, while DNSSEC can authenticate the discovery answer when available.
Check name
DNS-AID Agent Discovery
Score
65/100
Status
warning
Category
Skill Discovery
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Publish DNS-AID HTTPS/SVCB records under _agents for DNS-based agent entrypoint discovery.
Result
DNS-AID Agent Discovery has a validation warning at "Query DNS-AID records".
Validation steps
Query DNS-AID records
No DNS-AID HTTPS/SVCB records were found under _agents.
Evidence log1 step · 10 lines
Query DNS-AID records [warning]! No DNS-AID HTTPS/SVCB records were found under _agents.INFOQuery DNS-AID recordsINFOBuild DNS-AID query names from hostname hostname="ownkube.io" labels=["_index._agents.ownkube.io","_a2a._agents.ownkube.io"] claimedOnPage=falseWARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_index._agents.ownkube.io" rrtype="HTTPS" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" rcode=0 ad=true answerCount=0WARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_index._agents.ownkube.io" rrtype="SVCB" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" rcode=0 ad=true answerCount=0WARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_index._agents.ownkube.io" rrtype="ANY" resolver="node-resolveAny-fallback" answerCount=0 error="queryAny ETIMEOUT _index._agents.ownkube.io"WARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_a2a._agents.ownkube.io" rrtype="HTTPS" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" rcode=0 ad=true answerCount=0WARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_a2a._agents.ownkube.io" rrtype="SVCB" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" rcode=0 ad=true answerCount=0WARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_a2a._agents.ownkube.io" rrtype="ANY" resolver="node-resolveAny-fallback" answerCount=0 error="queryAny ETIMEOUT _a2a._agents.ownkube.io"WARNCompare total DNS-AID answer count actual=0 expected="> 0"WARNNo DNS-AID HTTPS/SVCB records were found under _agents.AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEmerging recommendation
llms.txt
llms.txt failed at "Score llms.txt structure and usefulness".
9 Fail
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEmerging recommendation
llms.txt
llms.txt failed at "Score llms.txt structure and usefulness".
Needs attention
llms.txt
Issue
llms.txt includes unsafe or private links that should not be advertised to agents.
Details
Why it matters
llms.txt is an emerging Markdown convention for giving language-model clients curated context and links before they crawl broadly. Broken, private, or low-signal links make the file much less useful even when it exists.
Check name
llms.txt
Score
66/100
Status
fail
Category
Content Readiness
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Publish a concise llms.txt index that helps agents discover useful public site context.
Result
llms.txt failed at "Score llms.txt structure and usefulness".
Validation steps
Score llms.txt structure and usefulness
llms.txt includes unsafe or private links that should not be advertised to agents.
Findings
- 2 links point to private, internal, credentialed, or non-HTTP(S) targets.
Probe sampled linked resources
Some sampled llms.txt links were broken, redirected unexpectedly, or did not return clearly agent-readable content.
Findings
- 6/25 probed links were broken or unreachable.
- 6/25 probed links did not look agent-readable.
Inspect optional llms-full.txt
Passed.
Evidence log3 steps · 19 lines
Score llms.txt structure and usefulness [fail]! llms.txt includes unsafe or private links that should not be advertised to agents.INFOScore llms.txt structure and usefulnessINFOChecking recommended summary, sections, link labels, agent-friendly links, duplicates, and unsafe targetsPASSCheck blockquote summary is present actual=true expected=truePASSCheck H2 section count actual=5 expected="> 0"PASSCheck Markdown-formatted links actual=24 expected="> 0"FAILCheck unsafe/private link count actual=2 expected=0FAILllms.txt structure-quality validation failed reason="llms.txt includes unsafe or private links that should not be advertised to agents."Probe sampled linked resources [warning]! Some sampled llms.txt links were broken, redirected unexpectedly, or did not return clearly agent-readable content.INFOProbe sampled linked resourcesINFOSelecting safe, useful links for bounded probing selectedCount=25PASSCheck probed links were attempted actual=25 expected="> 0"WARNCheck broken probed link count actual=6 expected=0PASSCheck agent-readable probed links actual=19 expected="> 0"WARNLinked resource probe validation completed with warnings reason="Some sampled llms.txt links were broken, redirected unexpectedly, or did not return clearly agent-readable content."Inspect optional llms-full.txt [informational]INFOInspect optional llms-full.txtINFOTrying to fetch /llms-full.txt url="https://ownkube.io/llms-full.txt"PASS/llms-full.txt returned HTTP 2xx statusCode=200 contentType="text/plain; charset=utf-8" length=184584PASSCheck llms-full.txt content type is Markdown-compatible text actual="text/plain; charset=utf-8" expected="text/markdown, text/x-markdown, text/plain, or another Markdown text type"PASSCheck llms-full.txt looks like supplemental full corpus content actual=true expected=truePASSOptional llms-full.txt inspection recorded
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
HSTS header
HSTS header has a validation warning at "Validate max-age".
9 Warning
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
HSTS header
HSTS header has a validation warning at "Validate max-age".
Needs attention
HSTS header
Issue
max-age is below 15552000 seconds.
Why it matters
HSTS tells browsers to keep using HTTPS after the first secure visit, reducing downgrade, SSL-stripping, and mixed-transport risk for repeat users.
Check name
HSTS header
Score
83/100
Status
warning
Category
Security & Trust
Maturity
Established
Goal
Require HTTPS for repeat browser visits with a valid Strict-Transport-Security policy.
Result
HSTS header has a validation warning at "Validate max-age".
Validation steps
Validate max-age
max-age is below 15552000 seconds.
Review preload opt-in
preload is present, but header-level preload requirements are missing: max-age >= 31536000.
Evidence log2 steps · 8 lines
Validate max-age [warning]! max-age is below 15552000 seconds.INFOValidate max-ageINFOInspect max-age directive maxAge=7776000 deploymentMinimumSeconds=15552000 preloadStrengthSeconds=31536000WARNCompare HSTS max-age actual=7776000 expected=">= 15552000 seconds" meetsMinimum=false meetsOneYear=false issue="max-age is below 15552000 seconds."WARNmax-age is below 15552000 seconds.Review preload opt-in [warning]! preload is present, but header-level preload requirements are missing: max-age >= 31536000.INFOReview preload opt-inINFOInspect preload opt-in preload=true includeSubDomains=true maxAge=7776000WARNCompare header-level preload requirements actual="not eligible by header" expected="preload + includeSubDomains + max-age >= 31536000" issue="preload is present, but header-level preload requirements are missing: max-age >= 31536000."WARNpreload is present, but header-level preload requirements are missing: max-age >= 31536000.
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AIO: Source and trust signals
AIO: Source and trust signals scored 50/100 and needs improvement.
8 Warning
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AIO: Source and trust signals
AIO: Source and trust signals scored 50/100 and needs improvement.
Needs attention
AIO: Source and trust signals
Issue
Missing AIO trust signals: author, publisher, freshnessDate.
Details
Why it matters
Google AI Overviews and AI Mode depend on normal Google Search eligibility, snippet permissions, useful visible content, consistent structured data, trust signals, and page experience basics. These signals help Google understand and preview a page, but they do not guarantee selection.
Check name
AIO: Source and trust signals
Score
50/100
Status
warning
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content eligible, understandable, and previewable for Google Search AI features without promising inclusion.
Result
AIO: Source and trust signals scored 50/100 and needs improvement.
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AEO: Answer-first passages
AEO: Answer-first passages scored 23/100 and needs a fix.
7 Fail
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AEO: Answer-first passages
AEO: Answer-first passages scored 23/100 and needs a fix.
Needs attention
AEO: Answer-first passages
Issue
28 section(s) bury or omit a concise opening answer.
Details
Why it matters
Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.
Check name
AEO: Answer-first passages
Score
23/100
Status
fail
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.
Result
AEO: Answer-first passages scored 23/100 and needs a fix.
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
GEO: Source and trust signals
GEO: Source and trust signals scored 50/100 and needs improvement.
4 Warning
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
GEO: Source and trust signals
GEO: Source and trust signals scored 50/100 and needs improvement.
Needs attention
GEO: Source and trust signals
Issue
Missing source or trust signals: authorOrOwner, freshnessDate, sourceLinks.
Details
Why it matters
Generative answer systems work best with visible, self-contained, evidence-backed content, clear entities, trustworthy attribution, structured page sections, and crawler-accessible HTML. These signals improve machine understanding even though they do not guarantee AI citations.
Check name
GEO: Source and trust signals
Score
50/100
Status
warning
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content easy for AI answer engines to extract, cite, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.
Result
GEO: Source and trust signals scored 50/100 and needs improvement.
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AEO: Evidence and trust
AEO: Evidence and trust scored 57/100 and needs improvement.
4 Warning
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AEO: Evidence and trust
AEO: Evidence and trust scored 57/100 and needs improvement.
Needs attention
AEO: Evidence and trust
Issue
Missing answer evidence or trust signals: author, publisher, freshnessDate.
Details
Why it matters
Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.
Check name
AEO: Evidence and trust
Score
57/100
Status
warning
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.
Result
AEO: Evidence and trust scored 57/100 and needs improvement.
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Organization / WebSite schema
Organization / WebSite schema is partially implemented.
4 Warning
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Organization / WebSite schema
Organization / WebSite schema is partially implemented.
Needs attention
Organization / WebSite schema
Issue
WebSite.publisher is missing.
Why it matters
Organization and WebSite schema help agents identify the publisher, canonical site identity, logo, and related profiles for attribution.
Check name
Organization / WebSite schema
Score
85/100
Status
warning
Category
Content Readiness
Maturity
Established
Goal
Identify the site owner and website entity in structured data.
Result
Organization / WebSite schema is partially implemented.
Validation steps
WebSite publisher linkage
WebSite.publisher is missing.
Evidence log1 step · 5 lines
WebSite publisher linkage [fail]! WebSite.publisher is missing.INFOWebSite publisher linkageINFOChecking whether WebSite.publisher points to the Organization entity websiteFormat="json-ld" organizationFormat="json-ld"FAILCheck publisher presence actual=false expected=true publisher={"present":false,"matchesOrganization":false} website={"name":"Ownkube","url":"https://ownkube.io"} organization={"name":"Ownkube","url":"https://ownkube.io"}FAILCheck publisher matches Organization actual=false expected=trueFAILWebSite publisher is missingGEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
GEO: Citable passages
GEO: Citable passages scored 58/100 and needs improvement.
4 Warning
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
GEO: Citable passages
GEO: Citable passages scored 58/100 and needs improvement.
Needs attention
GEO: Citable passages
Issue
3 explanatory paragraph(s) could be stronger for citation or AI extraction.
Details
Why it matters
Generative answer systems work best with visible, self-contained, evidence-backed content, clear entities, trustworthy attribution, structured page sections, and crawler-accessible HTML. These signals improve machine understanding even though they do not guarantee AI citations.
Check name
GEO: Citable passages
Score
58/100
Status
warning
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content easy for AI answer engines to extract, cite, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.
Result
GEO: Citable passages scored 58/100 and needs improvement.
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AIO: Visible content clarity
AIO: Visible content clarity scored 84/100 and needs improvement.
2 Warning
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AIO: Visible content clarity
AIO: Visible content clarity scored 84/100 and needs improvement.
Needs attention
AIO: Visible content clarity
Issue
Title, h1, description, and opening copy are weakly aligned. 28 section(s) may benefit from clearer answer-first openings.
Details
Why it matters
Google AI Overviews and AI Mode depend on normal Google Search eligibility, snippet permissions, useful visible content, consistent structured data, trust signals, and page experience basics. These signals help Google understand and preview a page, but they do not guarantee selection.
Check name
AIO: Visible content clarity
Score
84/100
Status
warning
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content eligible, understandable, and previewable for Google Search AI features without promising inclusion.
Result
AIO: Visible content clarity scored 84/100 and needs improvement.
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AEO: Entity and definition clarity
AEO: Entity and definition clarity scored 79/100 and needs improvement.
2 Warning
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AEO: Entity and definition clarity
AEO: Entity and definition clarity scored 79/100 and needs improvement.
Needs attention
AEO: Entity and definition clarity
Issue
Title, h1, description, and opening copy are weakly aligned.
Details
Why it matters
Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.
Check name
AEO: Entity and definition clarity
Score
79/100
Status
warning
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.
Result
AEO: Entity and definition clarity scored 79/100 and needs improvement.
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
GEO: Entity clarity
GEO: Entity clarity scored 82/100 and needs improvement.
2 Warning
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
GEO: Entity clarity
GEO: Entity clarity scored 82/100 and needs improvement.
Needs attention
GEO: Entity clarity
Issue
Title/H1 terms missing from description: ownkube, ship, lightning, speed, cloud, like, giant, stay.
Details
Why it matters
Generative answer systems work best with visible, self-contained, evidence-backed content, clear entities, trustworthy attribution, structured page sections, and crawler-accessible HTML. These signals improve machine understanding even though they do not guarantee AI citations.
Check name
GEO: Entity clarity
Score
82/100
Status
warning
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content easy for AI answer engines to extract, cite, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.
Result
GEO: Entity clarity scored 82/100 and needs improvement.
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AEO: Question and answer structure
AEO: Question and answer structure scored 86/100 and needs improvement.
1 Warning
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AEO: Question and answer structure
AEO: Question and answer structure scored 86/100 and needs improvement.
Needs attention
AEO: Question and answer structure
Issue
28 section(s) bury or omit a concise opening answer.
Why it matters
Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.
Check name
AEO: Question and answer structure
Score
86/100
Status
warning
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.
Result
AEO: Question and answer structure scored 86/100 and needs improvement.
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
GEO: Structured extraction
GEO: Structured extraction scored 88/100 and needs improvement.
1 Warning
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
GEO: Structured extraction
GEO: Structured extraction scored 88/100 and needs improvement.
Needs attention
GEO: Structured extraction
Issue
Missing or weak extraction signals: summary or key takeaways.
Details
Why it matters
Generative answer systems work best with visible, self-contained, evidence-backed content, clear entities, trustworthy attribution, structured page sections, and crawler-accessible HTML. These signals improve machine understanding even though they do not guarantee AI citations.
Check name
GEO: Structured extraction
Score
88/100
Status
warning
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content easy for AI answer engines to extract, cite, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.
Result
GEO: Structured extraction scored 88/100 and needs improvement.
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Structured data
Structured data has a validation warning at "Schema policy recommendations".
1 Warning
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Structured data
Structured data has a validation warning at "Schema policy recommendations".
Needs attention
Structured data
Issue
SoftwareApplication schema is missing recommended Google field(s): aggregateRating.
Why it matters
Structured data gives agents explicit entities, relationships, and page meaning that are harder to infer reliably from visual layout alone.
Check name
Structured data
Score
98/100
Status
warning
Category
Content Readiness
Maturity
Established
Goal
Expose machine-readable page entities and relationships through a recognized structured-data syntax.
Result
Structured data has a validation warning at "Schema policy recommendations".
Validation steps
Schema policy recommendations
SoftwareApplication schema is missing recommended Google field(s): aggregateRating.
Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Schema policy recommendations [warning]! SoftwareApplication schema is missing recommended Google field(s): aggregateRating.INFOSchema policy recommendationsINFOChecking search feature recommended fields on detected primary schema nodesWARNCheck schema policy recommendation issue count actual=1 expected=0 issues=[{"schemaTypes":["SoftwareApplication"],"format":"json-ld","missingRecommended":["aggregateRating"],"fieldEvidence":[{"name":"aggregateRating","present":false,"format":"json-ld"},{"name":"offers.priceCurrency","present":true,"value":"USD","format":"json-ld"}],"message":"SoftwareApplication schema is missing recommended Google field(s): aggregateRating."}]WARNSchema policy recommendations are missing issues=[{"schemaTypes":["SoftwareApplication"],"format":"json-ld","missingRecommended":["aggregateRating"],"fieldEvidence":[{"name":"aggregateRating","present":false,"format":"json-ld"},{"name":"offers.priceCurrency","present":true,"value":"USD","format":"json-ld"}],"message":"SoftwareApplication schema is missing recommended Google field(s): aggregateRating."}]AI DiscoverabilityDiscoverabilityEstablished
IndexNow key
IndexNow key is informational for this page.
Informational
AI DiscoverabilityDiscoverabilityEstablished
IndexNow key
IndexNow key is informational for this page.
Needs attention
IndexNow key
Issue
IndexNow key is informational for this page.
Why it matters
IndexNow lets sites notify participating search engines about changed URLs, but ownership verification requires a UTF-8 key file whose filename matches the key.
Check name
IndexNow key
Score
100/100
Status
informational
Category
Discoverability
Maturity
Established
Goal
Verify that IndexNow ownership key placement is detectable when the site advertises it.
Result
IndexNow key is informational for this page.
Validation steps
Find advertised IndexNow key location
No IndexNow key location was advertised in HTML, Link headers, or robots.txt.
Fetch and validate IndexNow key file
No discoverable IndexNow key file was found.
Evidence log2 steps · 10 lines
Find advertised IndexNow key location [informational]! No IndexNow key location was advertised in HTML, Link headers, or robots.txt.INFOFind advertised IndexNow key locationINFOLook for IndexNow key hints in HTML, Link headers, and robots.txt supportedHints=["robots.txt IndexNow-Key","rel=indexnow-key","meta name=indexnow-key-location"]PASSCompare advertised key location count actual=0 expected="> 0"WARNNo IndexNow key location was advertised in HTML, Link headers, or robots.txt.Fetch and validate IndexNow key file [informational]! No discoverable IndexNow key file was found.INFOFetch and validate IndexNow key fileINFOLook for IndexNow key hints in HTML, Link headers, and robots.txt supportedHints=["robots.txt IndexNow-Key","rel=indexnow-key","meta name=indexnow-key-location"]PASSCompare advertised key location count actual=0 expected="> 0"INFOFetch each advertised same-origin key file and validate filename/body matchFAILCompare valid IndexNow key file count actual=0 expected="> 0"WARNNo discoverable IndexNow key file was found.
Performance and AccessibilityAccessibilityBrowser audit
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
100 Fail
Performance and AccessibilityAccessibilityBrowser audit
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Check name
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Device
desktop
Category
Accessibility
Fix guidance
Low-contrast text is difficult or impossible for many users to read. [Learn how to provide sufficient color contrast](https://dequeuniversity.com/rules/axe/4.11/color-contrast).
References
https://web.dev/learn/accessibility/Evidence
{
"description": "Low-contrast text is difficult or impossible for many users to read. [Learn how to provide sufficient color contrast](https://dequeuniversity.com/rules/axe/4.11/color-contrast)."
}Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit
Network dependency tree
50 Fail
Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit
Network dependency tree
Check name
Network dependency tree
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Device
desktop
Category
Performance
Fix guidance
[Avoid chaining critical requests](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/network-dependency-tree) by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load.
References
https://web.dev/learn/performance/Evidence
{
"description": "[Avoid chaining critical requests](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/network-dependency-tree) by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load."
}Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit
Use efficient cache lifetimes
50 Fail
Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit
Use efficient cache lifetimes
Check name
Use efficient cache lifetimes
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Device
desktop
Category
Performance
Estimated savings
Est savings of 160 KiB
Fix guidance
A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page. [Learn more about caching](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/cache).
References
https://web.dev/learn/performance/Evidence
{
"description": "A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page. [Learn more about caching](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/cache).",
"displayValue": "Est savings of 160 KiB"
}Fix with MCP or CLI
Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.
Score history
Public scan score over time
Public reports for this website origin. Select any point or report link to open that canonical report.
| Scan date | Score | Readiness | Report |
|---|---|---|---|
| 74/100 | Level 3, Bot-Aware | Current report |