Export Report
OVERALL SCORE
Level 2, Agent-Limited
- AI Discoverability 33 out of 100
- Agent Ease of Use 47 out of 100
- Security & Trust 65 out of 100
- GEO, AIO and AEO 62 out of 100
- SEO 100 out of 100
- Performance 48 out of 100
- Accessibility 0 out of 100
What AI sees of your website
Phoenix Contact India
Phoenix Contact - the innovative market leader of industrial connection technology, automation technology, electronic Interface systems and surge protection.
Next step
Turn this report into a fix workflow
1 failed check is ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.
| Metric | Score | Status | Passed | Failed | Warning | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI Discoverability | 33 | Priority fix | 16 | 2 | 2 | View details |
| Discoverability | 20 | Priority fix | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| Content Readiness | 20 | Priority fix | 11 | 0 | 0 | |
| Bot Access Control | 55 | Needs work | 3 | 2 | 2 | View details |
| Agent Ease of Use | 47 | Priority fix | 0 | 1 | 0 | View details |
| Google Agentic Browsing | 33 | Priority fix | 0 | 1 | 0 | View details |
| GEO, AIO and AEO | 62 | Needs work | 7 | 0 | 0 | |
| GEO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| AIO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| AEO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| SEO | 100 | Strong | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| SEO | 100 | Strong | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| Security & Trust | 65 | Needs work | 15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Security & Trust | 65 | Needs work | 15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Performance | 48 | Priority fix | 9 | 1 | 0 | View details |
| Performance | 48 | Priority fix | 9 | 1 | 0 | View details |
Prioritized recommendations
Issues ranked by score impact
3 items need attention
AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEmerging recommendation
ai.txt policy
ai.txt policy failed at "Fetch /ai.txt".
77 Fail
AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEmerging recommendation
ai.txt policy
ai.txt policy failed at "Fetch /ai.txt".
Needs attention
ai.txt policy
Issue
/ai.txt returned HTTP 403.
Details
Why it matters
ai.txt is a fragmented emerging convention. It can communicate human-readable AI crawling, training, attribution, restriction, and contact guidance, but it is not a standard access-control mechanism and absence should not be penalized.
Check name
ai.txt policy
Score
23/100
Status
fail
Category
Bot Access Control
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Publish an advisory human-readable AI usage policy only when the site intentionally needs one.
Result
ai.txt policy failed at "Fetch /ai.txt".
Validation steps
Fetch /ai.txt
/ai.txt returned HTTP 403.
/ai.txt could not be fetched when present
Validate transport
ai.txt was served as application/xml; text/plain is preferred.
/ai.txt transport is invalid or not plain text
Parse ai.txt policy
ai.txt is present but does not follow the AI Visibility section model.
/ai.txt policy format is missing required sections or non-standard
Validate policy content
ai.txt is too short to provide useful advisory policy guidance.
/ai.txt content is incomplete or unsafe
Evidence log4 steps · 18 lines
Fetch /ai.txt [fail]! /ai.txt returned HTTP 403.INFOFetch /ai.txtINFORequesting optional advisory policy file at /ai.txtFAILCompare /ai.txt HTTP response actual=403 expected="2xx when ai.txt is intentionally published; 404/410 means absent optional file" contentType="application/xml" length=111FAIL/ai.txt returned HTTP 403. statusCode=403Validate transport [warning]! ai.txt was served as application/xml; text/plain is preferred.INFOValidate transportINFOChecking ai.txt media type, size, line count, and whether the response looks like plain text contentType="application/xml" length=111 lineCount=2WARNCompare media type to preferred text/plain transport actual="application/xml" expected="text/plain preferred; readable text required"WARNai.txt was served as application/xml; text/plain is preferred. warnings=["ai.txt was served as application/xml; text/plain is preferred."]Parse ai.txt policy [warning]! ai.txt is present but does not follow the AI Visibility section model.INFOParse ai.txt policyINFODetecting ai.txt convention from bracket sections, frontmatter, headings, and ai.txt context linksINFODetected policy structure convention="unknown-text" sections=[] markdownHeadings=[]WARNCheck AI Visibility required sections actual="missing identity, permissions, restrictions" expected="identity, permissions, and restrictions" missingRecommended=["attribution","contact","content-types"]WARNai.txt is present but does not follow the AI Visibility section model.Validate policy content [fail]! ai.txt is too short to provide useful advisory policy guidance.INFOValidate policy contentINFOChecking required section content, permission/restriction language, attribution, contact details, and safety risks convention="unknown-text"INFODetected policy signals hasPermissionLanguage=false hasRestrictionLanguage=false hasTrainingLanguage=false hasAttributionLanguage=false hasContact=falseFAILCheck required and recommended section coverage actual={"missingRequired":["identity","permissions","restrictions"],"missingRecommended":["attribution","contact","content-types"]} expected={"missingRequired":[],"recommendedPresentWhenPossible":true}FAILai.txt is too short to provide useful advisory policy guidance.
Agent Ease of UseGoogle Agentic BrowsingBrowser audit
Accessibility tree is not well-formed
100 Fail
Agent Ease of UseGoogle Agentic BrowsingBrowser audit
Accessibility tree is not well-formed
Check name
Accessibility tree is not well-formed
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Device
desktop
Category
Google Agentic Browsing
Fix guidance
A well-formed [accessibility tree](http://goo.gle/lighthouse-agentic-a11y) helps AI agents to navigate and interact with the page.
Evidence
{
"description": "A well-formed [accessibility tree](http://goo.gle/lighthouse-agentic-a11y) helps AI agents to navigate and interact with the page."
}PerformancePerformanceBrowser audit
Avoid large layout shifts
100 Fail
PerformancePerformanceBrowser audit
Avoid large layout shifts
Check name
Avoid large layout shifts
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Device
desktop
Category
Performance
Estimated savings
14 layout shifts found
Fix guidance
These are the largest layout shifts observed on the page. Each table item represents a single layout shift, and shows the element that shifted the most. Below each item are possible root causes that led to the layout shift. Some of these layout shifts may not be included in the CLS metric value due to [windowing](https://web.dev/articles/cls#what_is_cls). [Learn how to improve CLS](https://web.dev/articles/optimize-cls)
References
web.dev/learn/performanceEvidence
{
"displayValue": "14 layout shifts found",
"description": "These are the largest layout shifts observed on the page. Each table item represents a single layout shift, and shows the element that shifted the most. Below each item are possible root causes that led to the layout shift. Some of these layout shifts may not be included in the CLS metric value due to [windowing](https://web.dev/articles/cls#what_is_cls). [Learn how to improve CLS](https://web.dev/articles/optimize-cls)"
}Sign in to see 46 other issues and the full report
Create a free account to unlock every issue, evidence details, exports, and higher free limits.
Fix with MCP or CLI
Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.
Score history
Public scan score over time
Public reports for this website origin. Select any point or report link to open that canonical report.
| Scan date | Score | Readiness | Report |
|---|---|---|---|
| 39/100 | Level 2, Agent-Limited | Current report |