Export Report
OVERALL SCORE
Level 3, Bot-Aware
- AI Discoverability 57 out of 100
- Agent Ease of Use 57 out of 100
- Security & Trust 71 out of 100
- GEO, AIO and AEO 64 out of 100
- SEO 100 out of 100
- Performance 80 out of 100
- Accessibility 93 out of 100
What AI sees of your website
Emerging Threat Intelligence - Cyber Threat Solutions | Proofpoint US
Discover how Proofpoint emerging threat Intelligence delivers timely and accurate cyber threat intelligence to provide deeper context and seamless integration with security tools.
Next step
Turn this report into a fix workflow
2 failed checks are ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.
| Metric | Score | Status | Passed | Failed | Warning | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI Discoverability | 57 | Needs work | 29 | 1 | 1 | View details |
| Discoverability | 47 | Priority fix | 6 | 0 | 0 | |
| Content Readiness | 61 | Needs work | 20 | 1 | 1 | View details |
| Bot Access Control | 63 | Needs work | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| Agent Ease of Use | 57 | Needs work | 4 | 0 | 0 | |
| API | 67 | Needs work | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Auth | 48 | Priority fix | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Google Agentic Browsing | 100 | Strong | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| GEO, AIO and AEO | 64 | Needs work | 9 | 0 | 0 | |
| GEO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| AIO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| AEO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| SEO | 100 | Strong | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| SEO | 100 | Strong | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| Security & Trust | 71 | Needs work | 19 | 2 | 2 | View details |
| Security & Trust | 71 | Needs work | 19 | 2 | 2 | View details |
| Performance | 80 | Mostly ready | 11 | 0 | 0 | |
| Performance | 80 | Mostly ready | 11 | 0 | 0 |
Prioritized recommendations
Issues ranked by score impact
3 items need attention
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Author attribution
Author attribution is partially implemented.
45 Warning
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Author attribution
Author attribution is partially implemented.
Needs attention
Author attribution
Issue
No named author or publisher identity could be extracted.
Details
Why it matters
Author attribution helps agents cite content responsibly, assess source credibility, and distinguish editorial pages from anonymous marketing copy.
Check name
Author attribution
Score
55/100
Status
warning
Category
Content Readiness
Maturity
Established
Goal
Identify content authors or publishers for trust and attribution.
Result
Author attribution is partially implemented.
Validation steps
Schema.org attribution
Schema.org attribution is incomplete or relies only on publisher/fallback evidence.
Schema.org author attribution is missing or incomplete
Author identity quality
No named author or publisher identity could be extracted.
Author identity quality is incomplete
Evidence log2 steps · 8 lines
Schema.org attribution [warning]! Schema.org attribution is incomplete or relies only on publisher/fallback evidence.INFOSchema.org attributionINFOChecking structured data for author, creator, and publisher contributorsWARNCheck named Schema.org author count actual=0 expected="> 0" authorCount=0 publisherCount=2 namedContributors=0 authors=[] publishers=[{"role":"publisher","id":"https://www.proofpoint.com/#organization","sameAs":[],"format":"json-ld","mergedName":false},{"role":"publisher","id":"https://www.proofpoint.com/#organization","sameAs":[],"format":"json-ld","mergedName":false}] formats=["json-ld"]WARNSchema.org attribution is incomplete or fallback-only authorCount=0 publisherCount=2 authors=[] publishers=[{"role":"publisher","id":"https://www.proofpoint.com/#organization","sameAs":[],"format":"json-ld","mergedName":false},{"role":"publisher","id":"https://www.proofpoint.com/#organization","sameAs":[],"format":"json-ld","mergedName":false}]Author identity quality [fail]! No named author or publisher identity could be extracted.INFOAuthor identity qualityINFOChecking contributors for stable identity signalsFAILCheck identified contributor count actual=0 expected="> 0" namedContributors=0 identifiedContributors=[] unidentifiedContributors=[{"role":"publisher","id":"https://www.proofpoint.com/#organization","sameAs":[],"format":"json-ld","mergedName":false},{"role":"publisher","id":"https://www.proofpoint.com/#organization","sameAs":[],"format":"json-ld","mergedName":false}]FAILNo named contributor identity could be extracted
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Frame protection
Frame protection failed at "Validate CSP frame-ancestors".
20 Fail
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Frame protection
Frame protection failed at "Validate CSP frame-ancestors".
Needs attention
Frame protection
Issue
frame-ancestors contains invalid source expressions: app.mutinyhq.com.
Details
Why it matters
Frame protection blocks hostile sites from embedding pages in deceptive frames, reducing clickjacking and UI redressing risk.
Check name
Frame protection
Score
60/100
Status
fail
Category
Security & Trust
Maturity
Established
Goal
Prevent unwanted framing with an enforcing CSP frame-ancestors directive or a valid X-Frame-Options fallback.
Result
Frame protection failed at "Validate CSP frame-ancestors".
Validation steps
Validate CSP frame-ancestors
frame-ancestors contains invalid source expressions: app.mutinyhq.com.
CSP frame-ancestors is missing or ineffective
Review CSP and XFO interaction
CSP frame-ancestors controls modern browser behavior, but the X-Frame-Options fallback is invalid or conflicting.
CSP and X-Frame-Options conflict or leave legacy gaps
Evidence log2 steps · 8 lines
Validate CSP frame-ancestors [fail]! frame-ancestors contains invalid source expressions: app.mutinyhq.com.INFOValidate CSP frame-ancestorsINFORead CSP frame-ancestors signals enforcingHeaderPresent=true reportOnlyHeaderPresent=false metaFrameAncestors=false policyCount=1 duplicateDirectives=[]FAILCompare effective frame-ancestors directive actual={"values":["'self'","app.mutinyhq.com"],"mode":"malformed","valid":false,"restrictive":false,"broadSources":[]} expected="valid restrictive enforcing frame-ancestors" issue="frame-ancestors contains invalid source expressions: app.mutinyhq.com."FAILframe-ancestors contains invalid source expressions: app.mutinyhq.com.Review CSP and XFO interaction [warning]! CSP frame-ancestors controls modern browser behavior, but the X-Frame-Options fallback is invalid or conflicting.INFOReview CSP and XFO interactionINFOCompare modern CSP and legacy XFO behavior modernBrowserMechanism="csp-frame-ancestors" cspOverridesXfo=true cspMode="malformed" xfoDirective="sameorigin"WARNCheck CSP/XFO policy alignment actual="aligned or single mechanism" expected="no conflicting framing policy" issue="CSP frame-ancestors controls modern browser behavior, but the X-Frame-Options fallback is invalid or conflicting."WARNCSP frame-ancestors controls modern browser behavior, but the X-Frame-Options fallback is invalid or conflicting.
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Content-Security-Policy
Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate script execution".
16 Fail
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Content-Security-Policy
Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate script execution".
Needs attention
Content-Security-Policy
Issue
script-src allows dangerous script schemes: blob:.
Details
Why it matters
Content Security Policy reduces the impact of injection bugs by limiting where scripts, styles, frames, forms, and other browser resources can load or execute.
Check name
Content-Security-Policy
Score
68/100
Status
fail
Category
Security & Trust
Maturity
Established
Goal
Constrain browser resource loading and script execution with an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.
Result
Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate script execution".
Validation steps
Evaluate script execution
script-src allows dangerous script schemes: blob:.
CSP script execution policy is unsafe
Review hardening directives
CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: base-uri, form-action.
CSP hardening directives are missing or weak
Evidence log2 steps · 8 lines
Evaluate script execution [fail]! script-src allows dangerous script schemes: blob:.INFOEvaluate script executionINFOInspect effective script directive effectiveDirective="script-src" sources=["'self'","'unsafe-inline'","'unsafe-eval'","blob:","https://www.google-analytics.com","https://www.googleoptimize.com","https://www.googletagmanager.com","https://munchkin.marketo.net","https://app-abj.marketo.com","https://www.googleadservices.com","https://googleads.g.doubleclick.net","https://geoip-js.com","https://ads.avocet.io","https://trk.techtarget.com","https://j.6sc.co","https://tags.srv.stackadapt.com","https://ads.avct.cloud","https://js.driftt.com","https://js-agent.newrelic.com","https://bam.nr-data.net","https://cdn.jsdelivr.net","https://js.adsrvr.org","https://go.affec.tv","https://bat.bing.com","https://s7.addthis.com","https://m.addthis.com","https://z.moatads.com","https://snap.licdn.com","https://tracking.g2crowd.com","https://connect.facebook.net","*.visualwebsiteoptimizer.com","https://app.vwo.com","*.sharethis.com","https://unpkg.com","https://d1hgczpbubj217.cloudfront.net","https://app-static.turtl.co","https://js.zi-scripts.com","*.mutinycdn.com","https://www.clarity.ms","https://scripts.clarity.ms","*.roundprinceweb.com","https://www.redditstatic.com","https://go.proofpoint.com","https://www.google.com","https://www.gstatic.com","https://www.buzzsprout.com","*.vimeocdn.com","https://storage.googleapis.com","https://js.navattic.com","*.qualified.com","https://wpaassets.blob.core.windows.net","*.youtube.com","vimeo.com","*.vimeo.com","cdn.cookielaw.org","*.onetrust.com","*.proofpoint.com","https://live.rezync.com"]FAILCompare script execution posture actual={"hasNonce":false,"hasHash":false,"hasStrictDynamic":false,"hasUnsafeInline":true,"hasUnsafeEval":true,"hasWildcardHost":true,"hasBroadScheme":false,"dangerousSchemes":["blob:"]} expected="constrained script sources without unsafe execution allowances" issue="script-src allows dangerous script schemes: blob:."FAILscript-src allows dangerous script schemes: blob:.Review hardening directives [warning]! CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: base-uri, form-action.INFOReview hardening directivesINFOInspect CSP hardening directives objectSrc=["'self'"] frameAncestors=["'self'","app.mutinyhq.com"] formCount=1WARNCompare recommended hardening coverage actual=["base-uri","form-action"] expected="no missing object-src/base-uri/form-action requirements" issue="CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: base-uri, form-action."WARNCSP is missing recommended hardening directives: base-uri, form-action.
Sign in to see 38 other issues and the full report
Create a free account to unlock every issue, evidence details, exports, and higher free limits.
Fix with MCP or CLI
Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.
Score history
Public scan score over time
Public reports for this website origin. Select any point or report link to open that canonical report.
| Scan date | Score | Readiness | Report |
|---|---|---|---|
| 53/100 | Level 3, Bot-Aware | View report | |
| 67/100 | Level 3, Bot-Aware | Current report |