Rescan Report
Share Report
Copy Report Link
Rescan Report
Share Report
Copy Report Link
Export Report
57/100

OVERALL SCORE

Level 3, Bot-Aware

Moderate readiness for AI agents
AIDiscoverability35%Agent Easeof Use47%Security& Trust52%GEO, AIO, AEO68%SEO100%Performance& Accessibility98%
  • AI Discoverability 35 out of 100
  • Agent Ease of Use 47 out of 100
  • Security & Trust 52 out of 100
  • GEO, AIO and AEO 68 out of 100
  • SEO 100 out of 100
  • Performance and Accessibility 98 out of 100

CAPTURED SCREENSHOT

Captured website desktop screenshot

What AI sees of your website

Developer Roadmaps - roadmap.sh favicon

Developer Roadmaps - roadmap.sh

Community driven roadmaps, articles and guides for developers to grow in their career.

Next step

Turn this report into a fix workflow

21 failed checks are ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.

Detailed report scores grouped by capability area
MetricScoreStatusPassedFailedWarningEvidence
AI Discoverability
35
Priority fix16227View details
Discoverability
47
Priority fix630View details
Content Readiness
24
Priority fix9165View details
Bot Access Control
33
Priority fix132View details
Agent Ease of Use
47
Priority fix181513View details
API
66
Needs work621View details
Auth
48
Priority fix112View details
MCP
40
Priority fix344View details
Skill Discovery
47
Priority fix555View details
Agent Commerce
43
Priority fix331View details
GEO, AIO and AEO
68
Needs work1134View details
GEO Readiness
61
Needs work312View details
AIO Readiness
93
Strong501
AEO Readiness
50
Needs work321View details
SEO
100
Strong1000
SEO
100
Strong1000
Security & Trust
52
Needs work943View details
Security & Trust
52
Needs work943View details
Performance and Accessibility
98
Strong2421View details
Performance
97
Strong1611View details
Accessibility
99
Strong810View details

Prioritized recommendations

Issues ranked by score impact

42 items need attention

Agent Ease of UseAgent CommerceInformational

ACP - Agentic Commerce Protocol

ACP - Agentic Commerce Protocol failed at "Validate ACP discovery shape".

57 Fail

Needs attention

ACP - Agentic Commerce Protocol

Failed check
01

Issue

ACP discovery is missing protocol.

Details

02

Why it matters

ACP discovery lets agents find the seller's ACP API base URL, supported versions, transports, and stable services before attempting authenticated checkout-session negotiation.

Check name

ACP - Agentic Commerce Protocol

Score

43/100

Status

fail

Category

Agent Commerce

Maturity

Informational

Goal

Expose valid ACP discovery when this origin supports Agentic Commerce Protocol workflows.

Result

ACP - Agentic Commerce Protocol failed at "Validate ACP discovery shape".

Validation steps

  1. Validate ACP discovery shape

    ACP discovery is missing protocol.

    ACP discovery is missing protocol.

    ACP discovery is missing api_base_url.

    ACP discovery is missing transports array.

    ACP discovery is missing capabilities.

  2. Validate ACP endpoint and transports

    api_base_url is missing or unsafe.

  3. Validate ACP capabilities

    ACP discovery is missing capabilities.

  4. Review ACP cache and retry metadata

    ACP discovery is missing Cache-Control guidance.

Evidence log4 steps · 21 lines
Validate ACP discovery shape [fail]! ACP discovery is missing protocol.INFOValidate ACP discovery shape status="fail"INFOValidate ACP protocol object, name, date version, and supported_versions orderingFAILCheck protocol object and name actual={"hasProtocol":false} expected={"hasProtocol":true,"protocolName":"acp"}FAILCheck protocol version history actual={"supportedVersionCount":0,"supportedVersionsOrdered":true,"supportedVersionsEndWithCurrent":false} expected="date version with chronological supported_versions ending in current version"FAILACP discovery is missing protocol.Validate ACP endpoint and transports [fail]! api_base_url is missing or unsafe.INFOValidate ACP endpoint and transports status="fail"INFOValidate ACP API base URL and supported transportsFAILCheck safe HTTPS api_base_url actual=false expected=trueFAILCheck REST transport support actual=false expected=true transports=[] transportWarnings=[]FAILapi_base_url is missing or unsafe.Validate ACP capabilities [fail]! ACP discovery is missing capabilities.INFOValidate ACP capabilities status="fail"INFOValidate ACP services, extensions, intervention types, currencies, and localesFAILCheck capabilities object actual=false expected=trueFAILCheck stable ACP service declarations actual=[] expected="one or more known services such as checkout, orders, or delegate_payment"FAILCheck ACP capability values use stable service, extension, intervention, currency, and locale names actual="no compatibility warnings" expected="no unknown or unstable capability values" warnings=[]FAILACP discovery is missing capabilities.Review ACP cache and retry metadata [warning]! ACP discovery is missing Cache-Control guidance.INFOReview ACP cache and retry metadata status="warning"INFOInspect ACP discovery cache headers and retry guidance statusCode=200 cacheControl=null retryAfter=nullWARNCheck Cache-Control header on successful discovery actual="missing" expected="present for cacheable public discovery"WARNCheck Retry-After on rate-limit or unavailable responses actual="not required" expected="present only for 429 or 503"WARNACP discovery is missing Cache-Control guidance.

AI DiscoverabilityDiscoverabilityEstablished

Link headers

Link headers failed at "Find useful Link headers".

50 Fail

Needs attention

Link headers

Failed check
01

Issue

No useful agent discovery Link headers were found.

02

Why it matters

Link headers let automated clients discover API catalogs, documentation, and machine-readable alternates without parsing page markup first.

Check name

Link headers

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Category

Discoverability

Maturity

Established

Goal

Include Link response headers for agent discovery using RFC 8288.

Result

Link headers failed at "Find useful Link headers".

Validation steps

  1. Find useful Link headers

    No useful agent discovery Link headers were found.

  2. Fetch same-origin Link header targets

    Link headers did not expose any same-origin targets to validate.

Evidence log2 steps · 9 lines
Find useful Link headers [fail]! No useful agent discovery Link headers were found.INFOFind useful Link headersINFOParse response Link header linkCount=0FAILCompare registered agent-useful relation count actual=0 expected="> 0"FAILCompare community relation count actual=0 expected="accepted as weaker evidence"FAILNo useful agent discovery Link headers were found.Fetch same-origin Link header targets [fail]! Link headers did not expose any same-origin targets to validate.INFOFetch same-origin Link header targetsINFOFetch same-origin Link header targets and record external skipsFAILCompare same-origin Link target failures actual=1 expected=0FAILLink headers did not expose any same-origin targets to validate.

Agent Ease of UseMCPEmerging recommendation

MCP Server Card

MCP Server Card failed at "Validate server-card shape".

33 Fail

Needs attention

MCP Server Card

Failed check
01

Issue

The JSON document does not match a recognized MCP server-card profile.

Details

02

Why it matters

MCP server cards give agents a stable, public pre-connection discovery surface for server identity, remote transports, protocol compatibility, and safe routing without guessing endpoints.

Check name

MCP Server Card

Score

35/100

Status

fail

Category

MCP

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish an MCP Server Card that helps agents discover remote MCP server transports before opening a session.

Result

MCP Server Card failed at "Validate server-card shape".

Validation steps

  1. Discover MCP server card

    The MCP server card was found only at a transitional or linked path.

  2. Validate server-card shape

    The JSON document does not match a recognized MCP server-card profile.

    Missing required fields
    • known MCP server-card profile
    • transport or transports
  3. Validate MCP remotes

    No usable MCP remote transport was declared.

  4. Validate HTTP delivery

    CORS header Access-Control-Allow-Origin is absent.

  5. Probe same-origin MCP endpoint

    No MCP remote endpoint could be probed.

Evidence log5 steps · 37 lines
Discover MCP server card [warning]! The MCP server card was found only at a transitional or linked path.INFODiscover MCP server card candidateCount=5INFOBuild MCP server-card candidate list currentPath="/.well-known/mcp-server-card" transitionalPaths=["/.well-known/mcp/server-card.json","/.well-known/mcp/server-cards.json","/mcp.json","/.well-known/mcp.json"] linkedPaths=[]INFOTrying to fetch /.well-known/mcp-server-card url="https://roadmap.sh/.well-known/mcp-server-card" source="current"FAIL/.well-known/mcp-server-card did not return a usable server card statusCode=404 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8"INFOTrying to fetch /.well-known/mcp/server-card.json url="https://roadmap.sh/.well-known/mcp/server-card.json" source="transitional"FAIL/.well-known/mcp/server-card.json did not return a usable server card statusCode=404 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8"INFOTrying to fetch /.well-known/mcp/server-cards.json url="https://roadmap.sh/.well-known/mcp/server-cards.json" source="transitional"FAIL/.well-known/mcp/server-cards.json did not return a usable server card statusCode=404 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8"INFOTrying to fetch /mcp.json url="https://roadmap.sh/mcp.json" source="transitional"FAIL/mcp.json did not return a usable server card statusCode=404 contentType="text/plain;charset=UTF-8"INFOTrying to fetch /.well-known/mcp.json url="https://roadmap.sh/.well-known/mcp.json" source="transitional"PASS/.well-known/mcp.json returned a successful response statusCode=200 contentType="application/json; charset=utf-8" finalUrl="https://roadmap.sh/.well-known/mcp.json"WARNCheck selected card is published at the current well-known path actual="/.well-known/mcp.json" expected="/.well-known/mcp-server-card" source="transitional" finalUrl="https://roadmap.sh/.well-known/mcp.json"WARNMCP server card was discovered through a transitional or linked path path="/.well-known/mcp.json" source="transitional" reason="The MCP server card was found only at a transitional or linked path."Validate server-card shape [fail]! The JSON document does not match a recognized MCP server-card profile.INFOValidate server-card shape profile="unknown-json"PASSCheck response body parsed as JSON actual=true expected=truePASSCheck Content-Type is JSON-compatible actual=true expected=trueFAILCheck recognized MCP server-card profile actual="unknown-json" expected="sep-2127-draft" reason="Document does not match a known MCP server-card profile."FAILCheck required card fields are present actual=2 expected=0 missing=["known MCP server-card profile","transport or transports"]PASSCheck MCP server-card uses the current remotes[] profile without legacy compatibility warnings actual="no compatibility warnings" expected="current sep-2127-draft card shape with no legacy compatibility warnings" warnings=[]FAILMCP server-card shape validation failed reason="The JSON document does not match a recognized MCP server-card profile."Validate MCP remotes [fail]! No usable MCP remote transport was declared.INFOValidate MCP remotes remoteCount=0FAILCheck at least one MCP remote is declared actual=0 expected="> 0"PASSCheck invalid remote count actual=0 expected=0 invalidRemotes=[]PASSCheck same-origin remote coverage actual=0 expected=0FAILMCP remote validation failed reason="No usable MCP remote transport was declared."Validate HTTP delivery [warning]! CORS header Access-Control-Allow-Origin is absent.INFOValidate HTTP delivery finalUrl="https://roadmap.sh/.well-known/mcp.json"PASSCheck server card returned HTTP 2xx actual=200 expected="200-299"PASSCheck card is served as JSON actual="application/json; charset=utf-8" expected="application/json or +json"PASSCheck card is served over HTTPS actual="https:" expected="https:"WARNCheck browser-readable CORS header actual="missing" expected="Access-Control-Allow-Origin present"WARNCheck cache header is present actual="missing" expected="Cache-Control present"WARNMCP server-card HTTP delivery has non-blocking issues issues=["CORS header Access-Control-Allow-Origin is absent.","Cache-Control is absent."] reason="CORS header Access-Control-Allow-Origin is absent."Probe same-origin MCP endpoint [warning]! No MCP remote endpoint could be probed.INFOProbe same-origin MCP endpoint probeCount=0INFOSelecting same-origin unauthenticated MCP remotes for a bounded initialize probeWARNCheck successful initialize probe count actual=0 expected="> 0 when a safe same-origin unauthenticated remote exists" activeProbeCount=0 authBlocked=0WARNMCP endpoint probe could not fully confirm operability reason="No MCP remote endpoint could be probed."

AI DiscoverabilityDiscoverabilityEstablished

robots.txt

robots.txt failed at "Validate RFC 9309 core syntax".

30 Fail

Needs attention

robots.txt

Failed check
01

Issue

robots.txt was found but did not contain a valid, parseable User-agent group.

02

Why it matters

robots.txt gives crawlers and agents a standard place to read crawl permissions, disallowed paths, and sitemap locations before requesting site content.

Check name

robots.txt

Score

40/100

Status

fail

Category

Discoverability

Maturity

Established

Goal

Publish /robots.txt with clear crawl rules.

Result

robots.txt failed at "Validate RFC 9309 core syntax".

Validation steps

  1. Validate RFC 9309 core syntax

    robots.txt was found but did not contain a valid, parseable User-agent group.

Evidence log1 step · 5 lines
Validate RFC 9309 core syntax [fail]! robots.txt was found but did not contain a valid, parseable User-agent group.INFOValidate RFC 9309 core syntaxINFOParsing robots.txt into User-agent groups and Allow/Disallow recordsPASSCheck User-agent group count actual=1 expected=">= 1 parseable group" parsedUserAgents=["*"]FAILCheck malformed lines and orphan Allow/Disallow records actual={"invalidLines":0,"orphanRecords":19} expected={"invalidLines":0,"orphanRecords":0}FAILAllow/Disallow records appeared before any User-agent group orphanRecords=[{"directive":"disallow","value":"/og/","line":4},{"directive":"disallow","value":"/login","line":7},{"directive":"disallow","value":"/signup","line":8},{"directive":"disallow","value":"/forgot-password","line":9},{"directive":"disallow","value":"/reset-password","line":10}]

Agent Ease of UseMCPEmerging recommendation

WebMCP

WebMCP failed at "Probe WebMCP operability".

28 Fail

Needs attention

WebMCP

Failed check
01

Issue

Discovered WebMCP static metadata was fetchable but invalid.

Details

02

Why it matters

WebMCP gives agents structured page and browser tool hints so they can understand actions without relying only on screen scraping.

Check name

WebMCP

Score

44/100

Status

fail

Category

MCP

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Expose browser/page WebMCP tools and compatible static WebMCP metadata when a site wants agents to understand in-page actions.

Result

WebMCP failed at "Probe WebMCP operability".

Validation steps

  1. Detect WebMCP runtime API

    WebMCP-like strings were found, but rendered browser evidence did not confirm a usable runtime API.

  2. Probe WebMCP operability

    Discovered WebMCP static metadata was fetchable but invalid.

    WebMCP operability findings
    • Discovered WebMCP static metadata was fetchable but invalid.
  3. Validate declarative WebMCP form tools

    No W3C-style declarative WebMCP form attributes were found.

  4. Validate MCP-aware HTML annotations

    No data-mcp-tool or hyphenated WebMCP compatibility annotations were found.

  5. Validate static WebMCP JSON compatibility

    A discovered WebMCP static manifest or WMCP interaction graph was invalid.

    WebMCP JSON did not match a recognized tools[] or WMCP interaction-graph profile.

Evidence log5 steps · 23 lines
Detect WebMCP runtime API [warning]! WebMCP-like strings were found, but rendered browser evidence did not confirm a usable runtime API.INFODetect WebMCP runtime API status="warning"INFOProbe rendered browser for WebMCP runtime objects WARNCheck current W3C runtime API actual="not detected" expected="document.modelContext/registerTool available"WARNWebMCP-like strings were found, but rendered browser evidence did not confirm a usable runtime API.Probe WebMCP operability [fail]! Discovered WebMCP static metadata was fetchable but invalid.INFOProbe WebMCP operability status="fail"INFORun safe WebMCP operability checks safeProbeOnly=trueFAILCheck usable WebMCP evidence actual=0 expected="at least 1 usable runtime, declarative, annotation, or static manifest signal"FAILWebMCP operability failure issue="Discovered WebMCP static metadata was fetchable but invalid."FAILDiscovered WebMCP static metadata was fetchable but invalid.Validate declarative WebMCP form tools [informational]! No W3C-style declarative WebMCP form attributes were found.INFOValidate declarative WebMCP form tools status="informational"INFOInspect visible forms and controls for current declarative WebMCP attributes annotatedElements=0 formsWithAttributes=0 controlsWithAttributes=0SKIPValidate declarative WebMCP attribute quality actual=0 expected=0INFONo W3C-style declarative WebMCP form attributes were found. status="informational"Validate MCP-aware HTML annotations [informational]! No data-mcp-tool or hyphenated WebMCP compatibility annotations were found.INFOValidate MCP-aware HTML annotations status="informational"INFOInspect HTML for MCP compatibility annotations compatibilityAttributeCount=0 dataMcpToolCount=0 examples=[]SKIPValidate compatibility annotation quality actual=0 expected=0INFONo data-mcp-tool or hyphenated WebMCP compatibility annotations were found. status="informational"Validate static WebMCP JSON compatibility [fail]! A discovered WebMCP static manifest or WMCP interaction graph was invalid.INFOValidate static WebMCP JSON compatibility status="fail"INFODiscover static WebMCP manifest candidates conventionalPaths=["/.well-known/webmcp.json","/webmcp.json"] checkedCount=2 profileCounts={"unknown-webmcp-json":1}PASSWebMCP manifest candidate found source="path" path="/.well-known/webmcp.json" url="https://roadmap.sh/.well-known/webmcp.json" statusCode=200 contentType="application/json; charset=utf-8"INFOWebMCP manifest candidate checked source="path" path="/webmcp.json" url="https://roadmap.sh/webmcp.json" statusCode=404 contentType="text/plain;charset=UTF-8"FAILValidate discovered static WebMCP metadata actual={"validManifestCount":0,"invalidManifestCount":1,"toolCount":0,"wmcpActionCount":0} expected="at least 1 valid tools[] manifest or WMCP graph when static metadata is present"FAILA discovered WebMCP static manifest or WMCP interaction graph was invalid.

AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEmerging recommendation

TDMRep declaration

TDMRep declaration failed at "Fetch /.well-known/tdmrep.json".

25 Fail

Needs attention

TDMRep declaration

Failed check
01

Issue

TDMRep document must be a JSON array of rule objects.

02

Why it matters

TDMRep is a W3C Community Group protocol and IANA-registered well-known URI for declaring text and data mining reservation policy on applicable content.

Check name

TDMRep declaration

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Category

Bot Access Control

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish a machine-readable text and data mining reservation declaration and verifiable ODRL policy when the site needs one.

Result

TDMRep declaration failed at "Fetch /.well-known/tdmrep.json".

Validation steps

  1. Fetch /.well-known/tdmrep.json

    TDMRep document must be a JSON array of rule objects.

  2. Validate TDM declarations

    No valid TDM declarations were parsed from the declared TDMRep surface.

Evidence log2 steps · 8 lines
Fetch /.well-known/tdmrep.json [fail]! TDMRep document must be a JSON array of rule objects.INFOFetch /.well-known/tdmrep.jsonINFORequesting origin-level TDMRep declaration at /.well-known/tdmrep.jsonFAILCompare TDMRep file response actual=200 expected="2xx with JSON array when origin-level TDMRep is published" contentType="application/json; charset=utf-8" length=195FAILTDMRep document must be a JSON array of rule objects. compatibleContentType=trueValidate TDM declarations [fail]! No valid TDM declarations were parsed from the declared TDMRep surface.INFOValidate TDM declarationsINFOChecking reservation values, policy URLs, declaration source, and cross-surface consistency declarationCount=0FAILCompare malformed declaration count actual=1 expected=0 warnings=[]FAILNo valid TDM declarations were parsed from the declared TDMRep surface. source="well-known" index=-1

Agent Ease of UseAuthEstablished

OAuth / OIDC discovery

OAuth / OIDC discovery failed at "Fetch discovery metadata".

19 Fail

Needs attention

OAuth / OIDC discovery

Failed check
01

Issue

OAuth/OIDC was claimed or referenced, but no registered OAuth/OIDC discovery document was found.

02

Why it matters

OAuth and OIDC discovery let agents and API clients find authorization, token, and key endpoints programmatically instead of scraping login pages or guessing provider setup.

Check name

OAuth / OIDC discovery

Score

43/100

Status

fail

Category

Auth

Maturity

Established

Goal

Publish OAuth/OIDC discovery metadata only when the site operates or advertises a real OAuth/OIDC authorization server.

Result

OAuth / OIDC discovery failed at "Fetch discovery metadata".

Validation steps

  1. Fetch discovery metadata

    OAuth/OIDC was claimed or referenced, but no registered OAuth/OIDC discovery document was found.

Evidence log1 step · 6 lines
Fetch discovery metadata [fail]! OAuth/OIDC was claimed or referenced, but no registered OAuth/OIDC discovery document was found.INFOFetch discovery metadataINFOTrying OAuth/OIDC well-known metadata candidates checkedCount=2INFOChecked discovery candidate path="/.well-known/openid-configuration" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8" length=32280INFOChecked discovery candidate path="/.well-known/oauth-authorization-server" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8" length=32280FAILCheck discovery metadata fetch succeeded actual=2 expected="HTTP 2xx JSON metadata document"FAILFetch discovery metadata failed issue="OAuth/OIDC was claimed or referenced, but no registered OAuth/OIDC discovery document was found."

Agent Ease of UseAPIEstablished

OpenAPI discovery

OpenAPI discovery failed at "Validate OpenAPI shape".

18 Fail

Needs attention

OpenAPI discovery

Failed check
01

Issue

missing openapi/swagger version; missing info.title; missing info.version; no paths or webhooks defined; no operations defined; no operation responses defined

02

Why it matters

OpenAPI documents let agents understand operations, schemas, authentication, servers, and request/response formats before calling an API.

Check name

OpenAPI discovery

Score

65/100

Status

fail

Category

API

Maturity

Established

Goal

Publish a valid OpenAPI or Swagger document for public API discovery when this origin exposes public APIs.

Result

OpenAPI discovery failed at "Validate OpenAPI shape".

Validation steps

  1. Validate OpenAPI shape

    missing openapi/swagger version; missing info.title; missing info.version; no paths or webhooks defined; no operations defined; no operation responses defined

  2. Check machine-usable details

    OpenAPI is valid, but missing schemas, parameters, servers, auth, operation IDs, tags, or examples reduces machine usability.

Evidence log2 steps · 17 lines
Validate OpenAPI shape [fail]! missing openapi/swagger version; missing info.title; missing info.version; no paths or webhooks defined; no operations defined; no operation responses definedINFOValidate OpenAPI shape status="fail"INFOValidate required OpenAPI shape versionFamily="missing" pathCount=0 webhookCount=0 operationCount=0FAILCheck operations define responses actual=0 expected="every operation should define responses"FAILCheck info metadata actual={"hasInfoTitle":false,"hasInfoVersion":false} expected="info.title and info.version present"FAILOpenAPI shape issue issue="missing openapi/swagger version"FAILOpenAPI shape issue issue="missing info.title"FAILOpenAPI shape issue issue="missing info.version"FAILOpenAPI shape issue issue="no paths or webhooks defined"FAILOpenAPI shape issue issue="no operations defined"FAILOpenAPI shape issue issue="no operation responses defined"FAILmissing openapi/swagger version; missing info.title; missing info.version; no paths or webhooks defined; no operations defined; no operation responses definedCheck machine-usable details [fail]! OpenAPI is valid, but missing schemas, parameters, servers, auth, operation IDs, tags, or examples reduces machine usability.INFOCheck machine-usable details status="fail"INFOInspect machine-usable operation details hasServers=false hasSecuritySchemes=false hasExplicitNoAuth=false requestBodyOperationCount=0 parameterOperationCount=0 responseSchemaOperationCount=0 operationIdCount=0 taggedOperationCount=0 exampleOperationCount=0WARNCheck OpenAPI operations include enough detail for agents to call them safely actual="2 machine-usability warning(s)" expected="servers, auth/no-auth signals, operationIds, parameters, request bodies, responses, tags, and examples where relevant"WARNMachine-usability warning warning="No server, host, or basePath information was found."WARNMachine-usability warning warning="No security schemes or explicit no-auth declaration were found."FAILOpenAPI is valid, but missing schemas, parameters, servers, auth, operation IDs, tags, or examples reduces machine usability.

AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEstablished

AI bot rules in robots.txt

AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".

17 Fail

Needs attention

AI bot rules in robots.txt

Failed check
01

Issue

No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.

02

Why it matters

AI crawler product tokens have different meanings. Explicit robots.txt groups make training, search, and retrieval access policy auditable for compliant crawler operators.

Check name

AI bot rules in robots.txt

Score

31/100

Status

fail

Category

Bot Access Control

Maturity

Established

Goal

Declare deliberate robots.txt rules for major AI training, AI search, user-triggered, and dataset crawlers.

Result

AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".

Validation steps

  1. Classify AI crawler rules

    No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.

Evidence log1 step · 6 lines
Classify AI crawler rules [fail]! No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.INFOClassify AI crawler rulesINFOParsing User-agent groups and Allow/Disallow records for known AI crawler tokens evaluatedPath="/"INFOEvaluating exact User-agent matches before wildcard fallback exactAiPolicyCount=0 totalCrawlerTokens=18FAILNo explicit AI crawler User-agent groups were found examplesExpected=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ClaudeBot","Google-Extended","CCBot"]FAILCompare explicit AI crawler coverage actual=0 expected="> 0 explicit non-search AI crawler policies" missingTokens=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ChatGPT-User","ClaudeBot","Claude-SearchBot","Claude-User","Google-Extended","Applebot-Extended","Amazonbot","Amzn-SearchBot","Amzn-User","PerplexityBot"]INFOResolved effective root-path policy for crawler tokens blocked=0 allowed=21 unspecified=0

Agent Ease of UseAuthEmerging recommendation

Auth.md Agent Registration

Auth.md Agent Registration has a validation warning at "Warn when auth surface lacks Auth.md".

17 Warning

Needs attention

Auth.md Agent Registration

Warning
01

Issue

The site appears to support login, signup, account access, or credentials but does not publish /auth.md.

02

Why it matters

Human login and signup flows are often opaque to agents. Auth.md gives automated clients a stable registration contract instead of forcing them to scrape docs, automate browser forms, or guess credential flows.

Check name

Auth.md Agent Registration

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

Auth

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish Auth.md v1 metadata so agents can discover how to register, claim a user, and obtain credentials.

Result

Auth.md Agent Registration has a validation warning at "Warn when auth surface lacks Auth.md".

Validation steps

  1. Warn when auth surface lacks Auth.md

    The site appears to support login, signup, account access, or credentials but does not publish /auth.md.

Evidence log1 step · 2 lines
Warn when auth surface lacks Auth.md [warning]! The site appears to support login, signup, account access, or credentials but does not publish /auth.md.INFOWarn when auth surface lacks Auth.mdWARNThe site appears to support login, signup, account access, or credentials but does not publish /auth.md.

Agent Ease of UseAuthEmerging recommendation

OAuth Protected Resource

OAuth Protected Resource has a validation warning at "Detect protected-resource applicability".

17 Warning

Needs attention

OAuth Protected Resource

Warning
01

Issue

Generic authentication signals were found, but no OAuth Protected Resource metadata signal was detected.

02

Why it matters

Protected-resource metadata tells agents which API/resource is locked, which authorization servers can issue tokens for it, and how a 401 challenge maps back to the correct resource.

Check name

OAuth Protected Resource

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

Auth

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish OAuth Protected Resource Metadata for OAuth-protected APIs and MCP resources so clients can identify the resource and its authorization servers.

Result

OAuth Protected Resource has a validation warning at "Detect protected-resource applicability".

Validation steps

  1. Detect protected-resource applicability

    Generic authentication signals were found, but no OAuth Protected Resource metadata signal was detected.

Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Detect protected-resource applicability [warning]! Generic authentication signals were found, but no OAuth Protected Resource metadata signal was detected.INFODetect protected-resource applicabilityINFOInspecting auth headers, MCP/OAuth claims, and protected-resource hints applies=false requiresAuthorizationServers=false signalsCount=0 genericAuthSignalsCount=1 checkedCount=1WARNCheck protected-resource metadata applicability actual=false expected="true when RFC 9728 metadata exists or support is claimed" checked=[{"url":"https://roadmap.sh/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource","path":"/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource","source":"root-well-known","resourceIdentifier":"https://roadmap.sh","statusCode":404,"contentType":"text/html; charset=utf-8","length":32280}]WARNDetect protected-resource applicability completed with warnings issue="Generic authentication signals were found, but no OAuth Protected Resource metadata signal was detected."

Agent Ease of UseAPIEstablished

API Catalog

API Catalog has a validation warning at "Fetch API catalog".

17 Warning

Needs attention

API Catalog

Warning
01

Issue

This origin appears to publish or claim public APIs, but no RFC 9727 API catalog was found.

02

Why it matters

API catalogs help agents find API endpoints, service descriptions, documentation, status resources, auth metadata, and related machine-readable contracts without guessing entry points.

Check name

API Catalog

Score

67/100

Status

warning

Category

API

Maturity

Established

Goal

Publish an API catalog for automated public API discovery using RFC 9727 when this origin exposes public APIs.

Result

API Catalog has a validation warning at "Fetch API catalog".

Validation steps

  1. Fetch API catalog

    This origin appears to publish or claim public APIs, but no RFC 9727 API catalog was found.

Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Fetch API catalog [warning]! This origin appears to publish or claim public APIs, but no RFC 9727 API catalog was found.INFOFetch API catalogINFOFetch /.well-known/api-catalog requestedUrl="https://roadmap.sh/.well-known/api-catalog"WARNCompare API catalog HTTP status actual=404 expected="2xx/3xx"WARNThis origin appears to publish or claim public APIs, but no RFC 9727 API catalog was found. status="warning"

Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation

agents.json

agents.json failed at "Validate Wildcard schema shape".

16 Fail

Needs attention

agents.json

Failed check
01

Issue

agents.json does not match the expected Wildcard OpenAPI workflow shape.

02

Why it matters

Wildcard agents.json gives agents workflow-level context beyond plain OpenAPI, including flows, links, examples, and API action structure. It is an emerging OpenAPI-adjacent proposal, so scanners should validate the contract shape without treating it as an A2A or IETF standard.

Check name

agents.json

Score

35/100

Status

fail

Category

Skill Discovery

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish a Wildcard-style agents.json file so agents can discover OpenAPI-backed workflows, links, examples, and authentication requirements.

Result

agents.json failed at "Validate Wildcard schema shape".

Validation steps

  1. Validate Wildcard schema shape

    agents.json does not match the expected Wildcard OpenAPI workflow shape.

  2. Validate API actions

    Wildcard agents.json must include valid OpenAPI-derived action or operation definitions.

  3. Validate flows and links

    No executable flows were found.

  4. Review examples and LLM usability

    Examples or descriptions are too thin for reliable agent argument generation.

Evidence log4 steps · 17 lines
Validate Wildcard schema shape [fail]! agents.json does not match the expected Wildcard OpenAPI workflow shape.INFOValidate Wildcard schema shapeINFOParse agents.json and classify contract shape shape="unknown"FAILCompare contract shape actual="unknown" expected="wildcard"FAILCompare missing required schema fields actual="none" expected="none"FAILCompare Content-Type with JSON expectation actual=true expected=trueFAILagents.json does not match the expected Wildcard OpenAPI workflow shape.Validate API actions [fail]! Wildcard agents.json must include valid OpenAPI-derived action or operation definitions.INFOValidate API actionsFAILCompare API action count actual=0 expected="> 0"FAILCompare invalid action definitions actual=0 expected=0FAILWildcard agents.json must include valid OpenAPI-derived action or operation definitions.Validate flows and links [fail]! No executable flows were found.INFOValidate flows and linksFAILCompare workflow flow count actual=0 expected="> 0"FAILCompare operation link issues actual=0 expected=0FAILNo executable flows were found.Review examples and LLM usability [warning]! Examples or descriptions are too thin for reliable agent argument generation.INFOReview examples and LLM usabilityWARNCompare usable example count actual=0 expected="> 0 when actions are present"WARNExamples or descriptions are too thin for reliable agent argument generation.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AIO: Source and trust signals

AIO: Source and trust signals scored 50/100 and needs improvement.

15 Warning

Needs attention

AIO: Source and trust signals

Warning
01

Issue

Missing AIO trust signals: author, publisher, freshnessDate.

Details

02

Why it matters

Google AI Overviews and AI Mode depend on normal Google Search eligibility, snippet permissions, useful visible content, consistent structured data, trust signals, and page experience basics. These signals help Google understand and preview a page, but they do not guarantee selection.

Check name

AIO: Source and trust signals

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content eligible, understandable, and previewable for Google Search AI features without promising inclusion.

Result

AIO: Source and trust signals scored 50/100 and needs improvement.

AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished

Content freshness signals

Content freshness signals is missing or incomplete.

14 Fail

Needs attention

Content freshness signals

Failed check
01

Issue

Content freshness signals are incomplete: missing any valid freshness date in Last-Modified, Schema.org, Open Graph, Dublin Core, generic meta, or sitemap lastmod.

Details

02

Why it matters

Freshness signals help agents, crawlers, and search systems decide whether content is current enough to cite, summarize, cache, or compare against newer sources.

Check name

Content freshness signals

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Category

Content Readiness

Maturity

Established

Goal

Expose modified and published dates for freshness-aware retrieval, citation, and ranking.

Result

Content freshness signals is missing or incomplete.

Validation steps

  1. Validate Last-Modified header

    No valid Last-Modified HTTP header was found.

  2. Validate structured freshness dates

    No Schema.org freshness dates were found.

  3. Validate metadata freshness dates

    No Open Graph, Dublin Core, or generic meta freshness date was found.

  4. Corroborate with sitemap lastmod

    Add a sitemap entry with a valid lastmod for the canonical page URL when sitemap corroboration is useful.

Evidence log4 steps · 16 lines
Validate Last-Modified header [fail]! No valid Last-Modified HTTP header was found.INFOValidate Last-Modified headerINFOReading Last-Modified response headerFAILCheck Last-Modified header is present and parseable actual="missing" expected="valid" alternateDates=[]FAILLast-Modified header is missing or invalidValidate structured freshness dates [fail]! No Schema.org freshness dates were found.INFOValidate structured freshness datesINFOCollecting Schema.org freshness dates from JSON-LD, Microdata, and RDFaFAILCheck structured freshness date count actual=0 expected="> 0" invalidDateCount=0 formats={} alternateDates=[]FAILNo structured freshness dates foundValidate metadata freshness dates [fail]! No Open Graph, Dublin Core, or generic meta freshness date was found.INFOValidate metadata freshness datesINFOCollecting Open Graph, Dublin Core, and generic meta freshness datesFAILCheck metadata freshness date count actual=0 expected="> 0" metaDateCount=0 invalidDateCount=0 alternateDates=[]FAILNo metadata freshness dates foundCorroborate with sitemap lastmod [warning]INFOCorroborate with sitemap lastmodINFODiscovering sitemap candidates and matching the scanned page URL candidateCount=2 attempts=1WARNCheck matching sitemap lastmod actual="invalid match" expected="valid match when available" sitemapUrl="https://roadmap.sh/sitemap_index.xml" robotsStatusCode=200WARNNo matching sitemap lastmod found after sitemap attempts attempts=1

AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEmerging recommendation

llms.txt

llms.txt failed at "Fetch root llms.txt".

14 Fail

Needs attention

llms.txt

Failed check
01

Issue

/llms.txt was not found or could not be fetched.

02

Why it matters

llms.txt is an emerging Markdown convention for giving language-model clients curated context and links before they crawl broadly. Broken, private, or low-signal links make the file much less useful even when it exists.

Check name

llms.txt

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Category

Content Readiness

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish a concise llms.txt index that helps agents discover useful public site context.

Result

llms.txt failed at "Fetch root llms.txt".

Validation steps

  1. Fetch root llms.txt

    /llms.txt was not found or could not be fetched.

  2. Inspect optional llms-full.txt

    Passed.

Evidence log2 steps · 7 lines
Fetch root llms.txt [fail]! /llms.txt was not found or could not be fetched.INFOFetch root llms.txt path="/llms.txt"INFOTrying to fetch /llms.txt url="https://roadmap.sh/llms.txt"FAIL/llms.txt was not found or could not be fetched statusCode=404FAILFetch root llms.txt failed reason="/llms.txt is required for this check."Inspect optional llms-full.txt [informational]INFOInspect optional llms-full.txtINFOTrying to fetch /llms-full.txt url="https://roadmap.sh/llms-full.txt"SKIP/llms-full.txt is not present statusCode=404

AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished

Organization / WebSite schema

Organization / WebSite schema is missing or incomplete.

14 Fail

Needs attention

Organization / WebSite schema

Failed check
01

Issue

No Organization or Organization subtype was found in Schema.org structured data. No WebSite entity was found in Schema.org structured data. Missing identity field(s): Organization.name, Organization.url, WebSite.name, WebSite.url. WebSite.publisher is missing. Organization schema is missing logo and sameAs or public contact evidence.

02

Why it matters

Organization and WebSite schema help agents identify the publisher, canonical site identity, logo, and related profiles for attribution.

Check name

Organization / WebSite schema

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Category

Content Readiness

Maturity

Established

Goal

Identify the site owner and website entity in structured data.

Result

Organization / WebSite schema is missing or incomplete.

Validation steps

  1. Organization entity

    No Organization or Organization subtype was found in Schema.org structured data.

  2. WebSite entity

    No WebSite entity was found in Schema.org structured data.

  3. Identity fields

    Missing identity field(s): Organization.name, Organization.url, WebSite.name, WebSite.url.

  4. WebSite publisher linkage

    WebSite.publisher is missing.

  5. Organization trust fields

    Organization schema is missing logo and sameAs or public contact evidence.

Evidence log5 steps · 23 lines
Organization entity [fail]! No Organization or Organization subtype was found in Schema.org structured data.INFOOrganization entityINFOLooking for Organization or Organization subtype in structured data observedTypes=[]FAILCheck Organization entity presence actual=false expected=true fields=[{"name":"Organization.@type","present":false},{"name":"Organization.@id","present":false},{"name":"Organization.name","present":false},{"name":"Organization.url","present":false},{"name":"Organization.logo","present":false},{"name":"Organization.sameAs","present":false}]FAILOrganization entity is missingWebSite entity [fail]! No WebSite entity was found in Schema.org structured data.INFOWebSite entityINFOLooking for WebSite entity in structured data FAILCheck WebSite entity presence actual=false expected=true fields=[{"name":"WebSite.@type","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.@id","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.name","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.url","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.publisher.@id","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.publisher.name","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.publisher.url","present":false}]FAILWebSite entity is missingIdentity fields [fail]! Missing identity field(s): Organization.name, Organization.url, WebSite.name, WebSite.url.INFOIdentity fieldsINFOChecking Organization and WebSite name/url fields FAILCheck required identity fields actual=0 expected=4 missing=["Organization.name","Organization.url","WebSite.name","WebSite.url"] organizationFields=[{"name":"Organization.@type","present":false},{"name":"Organization.@id","present":false},{"name":"Organization.name","present":false},{"name":"Organization.url","present":false},{"name":"Organization.logo","present":false},{"name":"Organization.sameAs","present":false}] websiteFields=[{"name":"WebSite.@type","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.@id","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.name","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.url","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.publisher.@id","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.publisher.name","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.publisher.url","present":false}]WARNCheck identity URLs match scanned origin actual={"organizationUrlMatchesOrigin":false,"websiteUrlMatchesOrigin":false} expected={"organizationUrlMatchesOrigin":true,"websiteUrlMatchesOrigin":true}FAILIdentity fields are missing missing=["Organization.name","Organization.url","WebSite.name","WebSite.url"]WebSite publisher linkage [fail]! WebSite.publisher is missing.INFOWebSite publisher linkageINFOChecking whether WebSite.publisher points to the Organization entity FAILCheck publisher presence actual=false expected=true publisher={"present":false,"matchesOrganization":false} website={} organization={}FAILCheck publisher matches Organization actual=false expected=trueFAILWebSite publisher is missingOrganization trust fields [fail]! Organization schema is missing logo and sameAs or public contact evidence.INFOOrganization trust fieldsINFOChecking logo, sameAs, and public contact evidence FAILCheck logo presence actual=false expected=true fields=[{"name":"Organization.logo","present":false},{"name":"Organization.sameAs","present":false},{"name":"Organization.contactPoint","present":false},{"name":"Organization.telephone","present":false},{"name":"Organization.email","present":false},{"name":"Organization.address","present":false}]FAILCheck sameAs or contact evidence actual=0 expected=">= 1" sameAsCount=0 contactSignalCount=0 fields=[{"name":"Organization.logo","present":false},{"name":"Organization.sameAs","present":false},{"name":"Organization.contactPoint","present":false},{"name":"Organization.telephone","present":false},{"name":"Organization.email","present":false},{"name":"Organization.address","present":false}]FAILOrganization trust fields are missing

AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished

Structured data

Structured data failed at "Recognized structured data format".

14 Fail

Needs attention

Structured data

Failed check
01

Issue

No JSON-LD, Microdata, or RDFa structured data was found.

02

Why it matters

Structured data gives agents explicit entities, relationships, and page meaning that are harder to infer reliably from visual layout alone.

Check name

Structured data

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Category

Content Readiness

Maturity

Established

Goal

Expose machine-readable page entities and relationships through a recognized structured-data syntax.

Result

Structured data failed at "Recognized structured data format".

Validation steps

  1. Recognized structured data format

    No JSON-LD, Microdata, or RDFa structured data was found.

  2. Page-relevant schema family

    The page has specific visible content intent, but structured data does not include a matching primary schema family.

Evidence log2 steps · 8 lines
Recognized structured data format [fail]! No JSON-LD, Microdata, or RDFa structured data was found.INFORecognized structured data formatINFODetecting JSON-LD, Microdata, and RDFa in the page HTMLFAILCheck recognized structured-data formats found actual=0 expected="> 0" formatsFound=[]FAILNo recognized structured-data format foundPage-relevant schema family [fail]! The page has specific visible content intent, but structured data does not include a matching primary schema family.INFOPage-relevant schema familyINFOInferring specific page intent and comparing it with detected Schema.org typesFAILCheck schema types matching specific visible page intent actual=0 expected="> 0" inferredIntents=["software"] expectedTypes=["SoftwareApplication","WebApplication","MobileApplication"] matchingTypes=[] observedTypes=[]FAILNo primary schema family matches the inferred page intent expectedTypes=["SoftwareApplication","WebApplication","MobileApplication"] primaryTypes=[]

Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished

Referrer-Policy

Referrer-Policy failed at "Find Referrer-Policy header".

13 Fail

Needs attention

Referrer-Policy

Failed check
01

Issue

Referrer-Policy header is missing.

02

Why it matters

Referrer-Policy controls how much URL context is sent to other origins, limiting accidental leakage of paths, queries, and identifiers.

Check name

Referrer-Policy

Score

33/100

Status

fail

Category

Security & Trust

Maturity

Established

Goal

Limit how much referrer data leaves the site with an explicit Referrer-Policy header.

Result

Referrer-Policy failed at "Find Referrer-Policy header".

Validation steps

  1. Find Referrer-Policy header

    Referrer-Policy header is missing.

  2. Review observed browser responses

    One or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit Referrer-Policy.

Evidence log2 steps · 8 lines
Find Referrer-Policy header [fail]! Referrer-Policy header is missing.INFOFind Referrer-Policy headerINFORead Referrer-Policy delivery header="referrer-policy" value="missing" metaReferrerPolicyCount=0 browserDefault="strict-origin-when-cross-origin"FAILRequire explicit HTTP Referrer-Policy header actual="missing" expected="HTTP response header present" issue="Referrer-Policy header is missing."FAILReferrer-Policy header is missing.Review observed browser responses [warning]! One or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit Referrer-Policy.INFOReview observed browser responsesINFOSample Chrome-observed same-origin responses observedResponseCount=120 sameOriginCount=119 htmlDocumentCount=1WARNCompare observed Referrer-Policy coverage actual={"missingPolicyCount":1,"unsafeOrInvalidPolicyCount":0,"weakPolicyCount":0,"affected":[{"url":"https://roadmap.sh/","status":200,"resourceType":"document","contentType":"text/html; charset=utf-8","referrerPolicy":null,"classification":"invalid"}]} expected="0 missing, unsafe, invalid, or weak same-origin HTML responses" issue="One or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit Referrer-Policy."WARNOne or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit Referrer-Policy.

AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished

Markdown negotiation

Markdown negotiation is missing or incomplete.

13 Fail

Needs attention

Markdown negotiation

Failed check
01

Issue

Best candidate returned Content-Type "text/html; charset=utf-8" instead of text/markdown.

02

Why it matters

Markdown representations give agents a cleaner page form while preserving normal HTML for browsers and cache-safe representation handling.

Check name

Markdown negotiation

Score

10/100

Status

fail

Category

Content Readiness

Maturity

Established

Goal

Expose a useful Markdown representation through negotiation or an explicit alternate URL.

Result

Markdown negotiation is missing or incomplete.

Validation steps

  1. Markdown representation

    No usable Markdown representation was found through negotiation, advertised alternates, or conservative .md mirror checks.

  2. Same-URL negotiation

    Same-URL Accept: text/markdown did not return a valid Markdown representation.

  3. Markdown format validation

    Markdown response appears to expose MDX/JSX source rather than rendered agent-facing Markdown.

  4. Advertised Markdown alternate

    No Link or HTML rel=alternate text/markdown URL was advertised.

  5. Conventional .md mirror

    Conventional .md mirror candidates did not return valid Markdown.

Evidence log5 steps · 15 lines
Markdown representation [fail]! No usable Markdown representation was found through negotiation, advertised alternates, or conservative .md mirror checks.INFOMarkdown representationFAILCheck usable Markdown representation was selected actual={"source":"negotiated","url":"https://roadmap.sh/","statusCode":200,"contentType":"text/html; charset=utf-8","mediaType":"text/html","vary":"Accept-Encoding","requireVaryAccept":true,"contentTypeStatus":"fail","cacheStatus":"fail","bodyStatus":"fail","pass":false,"quality":{"valid":false,"formatStatus":"fail","dialect":"mdx-like","hasHeading":false,"headingCount":0,"wordCount":62357,"features":{"markdownLinks":0,"referenceLinks":0,"listItems":0,"tables":0,"taskListItems":0,"fencedCodeBlocks":0,"yamlFrontmatter":false,"jsonLdFencedBlocks":0,"admonitions":0,"strikethrough":0,"autolinks":0,"rawHtmlTags":1029,"jsxOrMdxSignals":2},"issues":["missing-heading","raw-html-heavy","mdx-jsx-source-leakage","plain-text-like"],"excerpt":"<!DOCTYPE html><html lang=\"en\"><head><meta charSet=\"utf-8\"/><meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width, user-scalable=yes, initial-scale=1.0, maximum-scale=3.0, minimum-scale=1.0\"/><link rel=\"preload\" as=\"image\" href=\"/img/gifs/rocke","issue":"Markdown response appears to expose MDX/JSX source rather than rendered agent-facing Markdown."}} expected="negotiated, advertised alternate, or conventional mirror" selected={"source":"negotiated","url":"https://roadmap.sh/","statusCode":200,"contentType":"text/html; charset=utf-8","mediaType":"text/html","vary":"Accept-Encoding","requireVaryAccept":true,"contentTypeStatus":"fail","cacheStatus":"fail","bodyStatus":"fail","pass":false,"quality":{"valid":false,"formatStatus":"fail","dialect":"mdx-like","hasHeading":false,"headingCount":0,"wordCount":62357,"features":{"markdownLinks":0,"referenceLinks":0,"listItems":0,"tables":0,"taskListItems":0,"fencedCodeBlocks":0,"yamlFrontmatter":false,"jsonLdFencedBlocks":0,"admonitions":0,"strikethrough":0,"autolinks":0,"rawHtmlTags":1029,"jsxOrMdxSignals":2},"issues":["missing-heading","raw-html-heavy","mdx-jsx-source-leakage","plain-text-like"],"excerpt":"<!DOCTYPE html><html lang=\"en\"><head><meta charSet=\"utf-8\"/><meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width, user-scalable=yes, initial-scale=1.0, maximum-scale=3.0, minimum-scale=1.0\"/><link rel=\"preload\" as=\"image\" href=\"/img/gifs/rocke","issue":"Markdown response appears to expose MDX/JSX source rather than rendered agent-facing Markdown."}} candidatesChecked=2FAILMarkdown representation failed issue="No usable Markdown representation was found through negotiation, advertised alternates, or conservative .md mirror checks."Same-URL negotiation [fail]! Same-URL Accept: text/markdown did not return a valid Markdown representation.INFOSame-URL negotiationFAILCheck negotiated Markdown response actual={"statusCode":200,"mediaType":"text/html","vary":"Accept-Encoding"} expected="HTTP 2xx text/markdown with Vary: Accept" url="https://roadmap.sh/" statusCode=200 mediaType="text/html" vary="Accept-Encoding"FAILSame-URL negotiation failed issue="Same-URL Accept: text/markdown did not return a valid Markdown representation."Markdown format validation [fail]! Markdown response appears to expose MDX/JSX source rather than rendered agent-facing Markdown.INFOMarkdown format validationFAILCheck Markdown body quality actual={"valid":false,"wordCount":62357,"headingCount":0,"dialect":"mdx-like"} expected="valid Markdown with substantive text and headings" valid=false dialect="mdx-like" wordCount=62357 headingCount=0FAILMarkdown format validation failed issue="Markdown response appears to expose MDX/JSX source rather than rendered agent-facing Markdown."Advertised Markdown alternate [warning]! No Link or HTML rel=alternate text/markdown URL was advertised.INFOAdvertised Markdown alternateWARNCheck advertised Markdown alternate candidates actual=0 expected="> 0 when HTML advertises a Markdown alternate" advertisedUrls=[] candidateCount=0WARNAdvertised Markdown alternate has a warning issue="No Link or HTML rel=alternate text/markdown URL was advertised."Conventional .md mirror [fail]! Conventional .md mirror candidates did not return valid Markdown.INFOConventional .md mirrorFAILCheck conventional Markdown mirror candidates actual=1 expected="> 0 when a conventional mirror is discoverable" conventionalUrls=["https://roadmap.sh/index.html.md"] candidateCount=1FAILConventional .md mirror failed issue="Conventional .md mirror candidates did not return valid Markdown."

Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation

Agent Skills index

Agent Skills index has a validation warning at "Discover Agent Skills index".

13 Warning

Needs attention

Agent Skills index

Warning
01

Issue

No Agent Skills discovery index was found at the canonical or legacy path.

02

Why it matters

An Agent Skills index lets agents discover task-specific instructions through a small trusted index, then verify and load only the skill artifacts they need.

Check name

Agent Skills index

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

Skill Discovery

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish an Agent Skills discovery index that advertises digest-pinned SKILL.md or archive artifacts.

Result

Agent Skills index has a validation warning at "Discover Agent Skills index".

Validation steps

  1. Discover Agent Skills index

    No Agent Skills discovery index was found at the canonical or legacy path.

Evidence log1 step · 5 lines
Discover Agent Skills index [warning]! No Agent Skills discovery index was found at the canonical or legacy path.INFODiscover Agent Skills indexINFOTry Agent Skills index paths in priority order paths=["/.well-known/agent-skills/index.json","/.well-known/skills/index.json"]WARNAgent Skills index candidate was not usable path="/.well-known/agent-skills/index.json" url="https://roadmap.sh/.well-known/agent-skills/index.json" statusCode=404WARNAgent Skills index candidate was not usable path="/.well-known/skills/index.json" url="https://roadmap.sh/.well-known/skills/index.json" statusCode=404WARNNo Agent Skills discovery index was found at the canonical or legacy path.

AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlInformational

Content Signal

Content Signal has a validation warning at "Validate declared usage preferences".

13 Warning

Needs attention

Content Signal

Warning
01

Issue

No Content-Usage or Content-Signal declarations were found.

02

Why it matters

Content usage preference signals communicate intended downstream AI use separately from robots.txt crawl permission. They can express training and search preferences for compliant systems without replacing access-control rules.

Check name

Content Signal

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

Bot Access Control

Maturity

Informational

Goal

Declare AI content usage preferences when the site intentionally publishes machine-readable usage policy.

Result

Content Signal has a validation warning at "Validate declared usage preferences".

Validation steps

  1. Validate declared usage preferences

    No Content-Usage or Content-Signal declarations were found.

Evidence log1 step · 5 lines
Validate declared usage preferences [warning]! No Content-Usage or Content-Signal declarations were found.INFOValidate declared usage preferencesINFOParsing declared preferences into terms and values recordCount=0SKIPSkipping declaration validation because no Content-Usage or Content-Signal records were declared.SKIPCompare declared records to validation requirement actual=0 expected="No validation needed when no records are declared"WARNNo Content-Usage or Content-Signal declarations were present.

Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation

DNS-AID Agent Discovery

DNS-AID Agent Discovery has a validation warning at "Query DNS-AID records".

13 Warning

Needs attention

DNS-AID Agent Discovery

Warning
01

Issue

No DNS-AID HTTPS/SVCB records were found under _agents.

02

Why it matters

DNS-AID lets agents discover index, A2A, and other agent entrypoints before fetching HTTP metadata. HTTPS/SVCB records provide the service-binding substrate, while DNSSEC can authenticate the discovery answer when available.

Check name

DNS-AID Agent Discovery

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

Skill Discovery

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish DNS-AID HTTPS/SVCB records under _agents for DNS-based agent entrypoint discovery.

Result

DNS-AID Agent Discovery has a validation warning at "Query DNS-AID records".

Validation steps

  1. Query DNS-AID records

    No DNS-AID HTTPS/SVCB records were found under _agents.

  2. Check DNSSEC authentication evidence

    DNSSEC authentication evidence was not visible for the DNS-AID labels or hostname.

Evidence log2 steps · 23 lines
Query DNS-AID records [warning]! No DNS-AID HTTPS/SVCB records were found under _agents.INFOQuery DNS-AID recordsINFOBuild DNS-AID query names from hostname hostname="roadmap.sh" labels=["_index._agents.roadmap.sh","_a2a._agents.roadmap.sh"] claimedOnPage=falseWARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_index._agents.roadmap.sh" rrtype="HTTPS" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" rcode=3 ad=false answerCount=0WARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_index._agents.roadmap.sh" rrtype="SVCB" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" rcode=3 ad=false answerCount=0WARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_index._agents.roadmap.sh" rrtype="ANY" resolver="node-resolveAny-fallback" answerCount=0 error="queryAny ETIMEOUT _index._agents.roadmap.sh"WARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_a2a._agents.roadmap.sh" rrtype="HTTPS" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" rcode=3 ad=false answerCount=0WARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_a2a._agents.roadmap.sh" rrtype="SVCB" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" rcode=3 ad=false answerCount=0WARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_a2a._agents.roadmap.sh" rrtype="ANY" resolver="node-resolveAny-fallback" answerCount=0 error="queryAny ETIMEOUT _a2a._agents.roadmap.sh"WARNCompare total DNS-AID answer count actual=0 expected="> 0"WARNNo DNS-AID HTTPS/SVCB records were found under _agents.Check DNSSEC authentication evidence [warning]! DNSSEC authentication evidence was not visible for the DNS-AID labels or hostname.INFOCheck DNSSEC authentication evidenceWARNCompare DNSSEC authenticated-data flag actual=false expected=trueWARNCompare visible DNSSEC material actual=false expected=trueWARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_index._agents.roadmap.sh" rrtype="HTTPS" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_index._agents.roadmap.sh" rrtype="SVCB" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_index._agents.roadmap.sh" rrtype="ANY" resolver="node-resolveAny-fallback" dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_a2a._agents.roadmap.sh" rrtype="HTTPS" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_a2a._agents.roadmap.sh" rrtype="SVCB" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_a2a._agents.roadmap.sh" rrtype="ANY" resolver="node-resolveAny-fallback" dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_index._agents.roadmap.sh" rrtype="DNSKEY" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_a2a._agents.roadmap.sh" rrtype="DNSKEY" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="roadmap.sh" rrtype="DNSKEY" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNDNSSEC authentication evidence was not visible for the DNS-AID labels or hostname.

AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEmerging recommendation

RSL license signal

No RSL declarations were found.

13 Warning

Needs attention

RSL license signal

Warning
01

Issue

No RSL declarations were found.

02

Why it matters

Really Simple Licensing is an emerging rights-expression layer for communicating content usage and licensing terms separately from robots.txt crawl permission.

Check name

RSL license signal

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

Bot Access Control

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Declare machine-readable content licensing terms for compliant AI and crawler systems when the site needs them.

Result

No RSL declarations were found.

Validation steps

  1. Discover RSL declarations

    No RSL declarations were found.

Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Discover RSL declarations [warning]! No RSL declarations were found.INFODiscover RSL declarationsINFOChecking robots.txt License records, HTTP Link rel=license headers, HTML license links, and inline RSL XML robotsFound=trueSKIPCount discovered RSL declarations actual=0 expected=">= 1 when RSL licensing terms are published" sources={}WARNNo RSL declarations were found on any supported discovery surface.

Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished

Content-Security-Policy

Content-Security-Policy failed at "Find enforcing CSP delivery".

12 Fail

Needs attention

Content-Security-Policy

Failed check
01

Issue

Applicable HTML response is missing an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.

02

Why it matters

Content Security Policy reduces the impact of injection bugs by limiting where scripts, styles, frames, forms, and other browser resources can load or execute.

Check name

Content-Security-Policy

Score

40/100

Status

fail

Category

Security & Trust

Maturity

Established

Goal

Constrain browser resource loading and script execution with an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.

Result

Content-Security-Policy failed at "Find enforcing CSP delivery".

Validation steps

  1. Find enforcing CSP delivery

    Applicable HTML response is missing an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.

Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Find enforcing CSP delivery [fail]! Applicable HTML response is missing an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.INFOFind enforcing CSP deliveryINFORead CSP delivery headers enforcingHeader="missing" reportOnlyHeader="missing" metaPolicyCount=0 legacyHeadersPresent=[]FAILRequire enforcing Content-Security-Policy header actual="missing" expected="present" issue="Applicable HTML response is missing an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header."FAILApplicable HTML response is missing an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.

Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation

A2A Agent Card

A2A Agent Card failed at "Detect A2A card version".

12 Fail

Needs attention

A2A Agent Card

Failed check
01

Issue

The discovered JSON document does not match a supported A2A Agent Card version family.

02

Why it matters

A2A Agent Cards provide protocol-specific discovery for agent identity, skills, input and output modes, transport bindings, capabilities, and security requirements. Legacy A2A also used /.well-known/agent.json, so scanners must classify the card shape before reporting readiness.

Check name

A2A Agent Card

Score

53/100

Status

fail

Category

Skill Discovery

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish a version-appropriate A2A Agent Card so A2A-compatible clients can discover agent skills and invoke the declared endpoint safely.

Result

A2A Agent Card failed at "Detect A2A card version".

Validation steps

  1. Detect A2A card version

    The discovered JSON document does not match a supported A2A Agent Card version family.

  2. Validate version-specific card shape

    Document does not match a supported A2A Agent Card shape.

    Missing required fields
    • skills[]
  3. Probe same-origin A2A endpoint

    A2A endpoint probing was skipped because the endpoint was cross-origin, unavailable from the card, or uses an unsupported binding.

Evidence log3 steps · 13 lines
Detect A2A card version [fail]! The discovered JSON document does not match a supported A2A Agent Card version family.INFODetect A2A card versionINFORead version indicators from the card detectionEvidence=[]FAILCompare detected A2A version family actual="unknown" expected="v0.1, v0.2, v0.3, or v1"FAILThe discovered JSON document does not match a supported A2A Agent Card version family.Validate version-specific card shape [fail]! Document does not match a supported A2A Agent Card shape.INFOValidate version-specific card shapeFAILCompare missing required card fields actual=["skills[]"] expected="none"FAILCheck every declared A2A skill has required name, description, and endpoint fields actual=0 expected=0 invalidSkills=[]INFOReview declared endpoint interfaces interfaces=[]FAILDocument does not match a supported A2A Agent Card shape.Probe same-origin A2A endpoint [warning]! A2A endpoint probing was skipped because the endpoint was cross-origin, unavailable from the card, or uses an unsupported binding.INFOProbe same-origin A2A endpointINFOProbe same-origin A2A endpoint when scanner policy allows itSKIPSkipped endpoint probe reason="No valid A2A card was available to probe."WARNA2A endpoint probing was skipped because the endpoint was cross-origin, unavailable from the card, or uses an unsupported binding.

Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished

HSTS header

HSTS header failed at "Find Strict-Transport-Security".

10 Fail

Needs attention

HSTS header

Failed check
01

Issue

HTTPS response is missing Strict-Transport-Security.

02

Why it matters

HSTS tells browsers to keep using HTTPS after the first secure visit, reducing downgrade, SSL-stripping, and mixed-transport risk for repeat users.

Check name

HSTS header

Score

50/100

Status

fail

Category

Security & Trust

Maturity

Established

Goal

Require HTTPS for repeat browser visits with a valid Strict-Transport-Security policy.

Result

HSTS header failed at "Find Strict-Transport-Security".

Validation steps

  1. Find Strict-Transport-Security

    HTTPS response is missing Strict-Transport-Security.

Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Find Strict-Transport-Security [fail]! HTTPS response is missing Strict-Transport-Security.INFOFind Strict-Transport-SecurityINFORead Strict-Transport-Security header header="strict-transport-security" value="missing" effectiveValue=null duplicateHeaderValueCount=0FAILRequire HSTS header on HTTPS response actual="missing" expected="present" issue="HTTPS response is missing Strict-Transport-Security."FAILHTTPS response is missing Strict-Transport-Security.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Answer-first passages

AEO: Answer-first passages scored 20/100 and needs a fix.

9 Fail

Needs attention

AEO: Answer-first passages

Failed check
01

Issue

5 section(s) bury or omit a concise opening answer.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Answer-first passages

Score

20/100

Status

fail

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Answer-first passages scored 20/100 and needs a fix.

Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished

X-Content-Type-Options

X-Content-Type-Options failed at "Find X-Content-Type-Options".

9 Fail

Needs attention

X-Content-Type-Options

Failed check
01

Issue

Browser-loadable response is missing X-Content-Type-Options.

02

Why it matters

X-Content-Type-Options tells browsers to trust declared media types instead of sniffing content, reducing the risk that mislabeled files execute as active content.

Check name

X-Content-Type-Options

Score

57/100

Status

fail

Category

Security & Trust

Maturity

Established

Goal

Prevent browser MIME sniffing for browser-loadable responses with X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

Result

X-Content-Type-Options failed at "Find X-Content-Type-Options".

Validation steps

  1. Find X-Content-Type-Options

    Browser-loadable response is missing X-Content-Type-Options.

  2. Review observed browser responses

    One or more same-origin active resources observed by Chrome did not emit X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

Evidence log2 steps · 8 lines
Find X-Content-Type-Options [fail]! Browser-loadable response is missing X-Content-Type-Options.INFOFind X-Content-Type-OptionsINFORead X-Content-Type-Options header header="x-content-type-options" value="missing"FAILRequire nosniff header actual="missing" expected="present" issue="Browser-loadable response is missing X-Content-Type-Options."FAILBrowser-loadable response is missing X-Content-Type-Options.Review observed browser responses [warning]! One or more same-origin active resources observed by Chrome did not emit X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.INFOReview observed browser responsesINFOSample Chrome-observed same-origin resources observedResponseCount=120 sameOriginCount=119 eligibleCount=119WARNCompare observed nosniff coverage actual={"missingNosniffCount":119,"malformedNosniffCount":0,"activeResourceMissingNosniffCount":116,"affected":[{"url":"https://roadmap.sh/","status":200,"resourceType":"document","contentType":"text/html; charset=utf-8"},{"url":"https://roadmap.sh/img/gifs/rocket.gif","status":200,"resourceType":"image","contentType":"image/gif"},{"url":"https://roadmap.sh/assets/manifest-226079b3.js","status":200,"resourceType":"script","contentType":"text/javascript"},{"url":"https://roadmap.sh/assets/jsx-runtime-u17CrQMm.js","status":200,"resourceType":"script","contentType":"text/javascript"},{"url":"https://roadmap.sh/assets/entry.client-Ec2hvVvl.js","status":200,"resourceType":"script","contentType":"text/javascript"},{"url":"https://roadmap.sh/assets/index-CKjkqIjd.js","status":200,"resourceType":"script","contentType":"text/javascript"},{"url":"https://roadmap.sh/assets/chunk-JPUPSTYD-d1-CrTzm.js","status":200,"resourceType":"script","contentType":"text/javascript"},{"url":"https://roadmap.sh/assets/root-DMVmUWlC.js","status":200,"resourceType":"script","contentType":"text/javascript"},{"url":"https://roadmap.sh/assets/chunk-LFPYN7LY-DbRpjMI3.js","status":200,"resourceType":"script","contentType":"text/javascript"},{"url":"https://roadmap.sh/assets/QueryClientProvider-CbxrFDM2.js","status":200,"resourceType":"script","contentType":"text/javascript"},{"url":"https://roadmap.sh/assets/use-auth-SD5D9cAD.js","status":200,"resourceType":"script","contentType":"text/javascript"},{"url":"https://roadmap.sh/assets/users-DWWHuyEG.js","status":200,"resourceType":"script","contentType":"text/javascript"}]} expected="0 missing or malformed eligible same-origin responses" issue="One or more same-origin active resources observed by Chrome did not emit X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff."WARNOne or more same-origin active resources observed by Chrome did not emit X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

GEO: Citable passages

GEO: Citable passages scored 35/100 and needs a fix.

8 Fail

Needs attention

GEO: Citable passages

Failed check
01

Issue

No evidence-backed, citation-length explanatory paragraph was found.

Details

02

Why it matters

Generative answer systems work best with visible, self-contained, evidence-backed content, clear entities, trustworthy attribution, structured page sections, and crawler-accessible HTML. These signals improve machine understanding even though they do not guarantee AI citations.

Check name

GEO: Citable passages

Score

35/100

Status

fail

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for AI answer engines to extract, cite, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

GEO: Citable passages scored 35/100 and needs a fix.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Evidence and trust

AEO: Evidence and trust scored 43/100 and needs a fix.

7 Fail

Needs attention

AEO: Evidence and trust

Failed check
01

Issue

Missing answer evidence or trust signals: author, publisher, freshnessDate, sameAs.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Evidence and trust

Score

43/100

Status

fail

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Evidence and trust scored 43/100 and needs a fix.

AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished

Author attribution

Author attribution is partially implemented.

6 Warning

Needs attention

Author attribution

Warning
01

Issue

No named author or publisher identity could be extracted.

02

Why it matters

Author attribution helps agents cite content responsibly, assess source credibility, and distinguish editorial pages from anonymous marketing copy.

Check name

Author attribution

Score

55/100

Status

warning

Category

Content Readiness

Maturity

Established

Goal

Identify content authors or publishers for trust and attribution.

Result

Author attribution is partially implemented.

Validation steps

  1. Schema.org attribution

    Schema.org attribution is incomplete or relies only on publisher/fallback evidence.

  2. Author identity quality

    No named author or publisher identity could be extracted.

Evidence log2 steps · 8 lines
Schema.org attribution [warning]! Schema.org attribution is incomplete or relies only on publisher/fallback evidence.INFOSchema.org attributionINFOChecking structured data for author, creator, and publisher contributorsWARNCheck named Schema.org author count actual=0 expected="> 0" authorCount=0 publisherCount=0 namedContributors=0 authors=[] publishers=[] formats=[]WARNSchema.org attribution is incomplete or fallback-only authorCount=0 publisherCount=0 authors=[] publishers=[]Author identity quality [fail]! No named author or publisher identity could be extracted.INFOAuthor identity qualityINFOChecking contributors for stable identity signalsFAILCheck identified contributor count actual=0 expected="> 0" namedContributors=0 identifiedContributors=[] unidentifiedContributors=[]FAILNo named contributor identity could be extracted

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

GEO: Source and trust signals

GEO: Source and trust signals scored 50/100 and needs improvement.

6 Warning

Needs attention

GEO: Source and trust signals

Warning
01

Issue

Missing source or trust signals: authorOrOwner, freshnessDate, entityLinks.

Details

02

Why it matters

Generative answer systems work best with visible, self-contained, evidence-backed content, clear entities, trustworthy attribution, structured page sections, and crawler-accessible HTML. These signals improve machine understanding even though they do not guarantee AI citations.

Check name

GEO: Source and trust signals

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for AI answer engines to extract, cite, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

GEO: Source and trust signals scored 50/100 and needs improvement.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Question and answer structure

AEO: Question and answer structure scored 58/100 and needs improvement.

5 Warning

Needs attention

AEO: Question and answer structure

Warning
01

Issue

No natural question headings were detected.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Question and answer structure

Score

58/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Question and answer structure scored 58/100 and needs improvement.

Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished

Frame protection

Frame protection has a validation warning at "Validate CSP frame-ancestors".

4 Warning

Needs attention

Frame protection

Warning
01

Issue

Frame protection relies only on X-Frame-Options; CSP frame-ancestors is the modern control.

02

Why it matters

Frame protection blocks hostile sites from embedding pages in deceptive frames, reducing clickjacking and UI redressing risk.

Check name

Frame protection

Score

81/100

Status

warning

Category

Security & Trust

Maturity

Established

Goal

Prevent unwanted framing with an enforcing CSP frame-ancestors directive or a valid X-Frame-Options fallback.

Result

Frame protection has a validation warning at "Validate CSP frame-ancestors".

Validation steps

  1. Validate CSP frame-ancestors

    Frame protection relies only on X-Frame-Options; CSP frame-ancestors is the modern control.

Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Validate CSP frame-ancestors [warning]! Frame protection relies only on X-Frame-Options; CSP frame-ancestors is the modern control.INFOValidate CSP frame-ancestorsINFORead CSP frame-ancestors signals enforcingHeaderPresent=false reportOnlyHeaderPresent=false metaFrameAncestors=false policyCount=0 duplicateDirectives=[]WARNCompare effective frame-ancestors directive actual="missing" expected="valid restrictive enforcing frame-ancestors" issue="Frame protection relies only on X-Frame-Options; CSP frame-ancestors is the modern control."WARNFrame protection relies only on X-Frame-Options; CSP frame-ancestors is the modern control.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

GEO: Structured extraction

GEO: Structured extraction scored 75/100 and needs improvement.

3 Warning

Needs attention

GEO: Structured extraction

Warning
01

Issue

Missing or weak extraction signals: summary or key takeaways, typed JSON-LD structured data.

Details

02

Why it matters

Generative answer systems work best with visible, self-contained, evidence-backed content, clear entities, trustworthy attribution, structured page sections, and crawler-accessible HTML. These signals improve machine understanding even though they do not guarantee AI citations.

Check name

GEO: Structured extraction

Score

75/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for AI answer engines to extract, cite, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

GEO: Structured extraction scored 75/100 and needs improvement.

AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished

Semantic HTML

Semantic HTML is partially implemented.

2 Warning

Needs attention

Semantic HTML

Warning
01

Issue

Semantic HTML is incomplete: 1 image alt text quality issues.

Details

02

Why it matters

Semantic HTML gives browsers, assistive technology, search systems, and agents reliable landmarks, headings, controls, form semantics, and image context.

Check name

Semantic HTML

Score

85/100

Status

warning

Category

Content Readiness

Maturity

Established

Goal

Expose readable page structure through semantic HTML and accessible controls.

Result

Semantic HTML is partially implemented.

Validation steps

  1. Page landmarks

    The page has a main landmark but is missing a primary navigation, header/banner, or page-level footer/contentinfo landmark.

  2. Image text alternatives

    1 image alt text issues were found.

Evidence log2 steps · 6 lines
Page landmarks [warning]! The page has a main landmark but is missing a primary navigation, header/banner, or page-level footer/contentinfo landmark.INFOPage landmarksWARNCheck page landmarks evidence actual={"counts":{"main":1,"roleMain":0,"nav":2,"roleNavigation":0,"header":0,"roleBanner":0,"footer":0,"pageFooter":0,"roleContentinfo":0},"main":true} expected="semantic HTML evidence for this step"WARNPage landmarks has a warning issue="The page has a main landmark but is missing a primary navigation, header/banner, or page-level footer/contentinfo landmark."Image text alternatives [warning]! 1 image alt text issues were found.INFOImage text alternativesWARNCheck image text alternatives evidence actual={"counts":{"images":2,"imagesWithAlt":2,"imageAltIssues":1},"imageAltCoverage":true} expected="semantic HTML evidence for this step"WARNImage text alternatives has a warning issue="1 image alt text issues were found."

AI DiscoverabilityDiscoverabilityEstablished

IndexNow key

IndexNow key is informational for this page.

Informational

Needs attention

IndexNow key

Informational
01

Issue

IndexNow key is informational for this page.

02

Why it matters

IndexNow lets sites notify participating search engines about changed URLs, but ownership verification requires a UTF-8 key file whose filename matches the key.

Check name

IndexNow key

Score

100/100

Status

informational

Category

Discoverability

Maturity

Established

Goal

Verify that IndexNow ownership key placement is detectable when the site advertises it.

Result

IndexNow key is informational for this page.

Validation steps

  1. Find advertised IndexNow key location

    No IndexNow key location was advertised in HTML, Link headers, or robots.txt.

  2. Fetch and validate IndexNow key file

    No discoverable IndexNow key file was found.

Evidence log2 steps · 10 lines
Find advertised IndexNow key location [informational]! No IndexNow key location was advertised in HTML, Link headers, or robots.txt.INFOFind advertised IndexNow key locationINFOLook for IndexNow key hints in HTML, Link headers, and robots.txt supportedHints=["robots.txt IndexNow-Key","rel=indexnow-key","meta name=indexnow-key-location"]PASSCompare advertised key location count actual=0 expected="> 0"WARNNo IndexNow key location was advertised in HTML, Link headers, or robots.txt.Fetch and validate IndexNow key file [informational]! No discoverable IndexNow key file was found.INFOFetch and validate IndexNow key fileINFOLook for IndexNow key hints in HTML, Link headers, and robots.txt supportedHints=["robots.txt IndexNow-Key","rel=indexnow-key","meta name=indexnow-key-location"]PASSCompare advertised key location count actual=0 expected="> 0"INFOFetch each advertised same-origin key file and validate filename/body matchFAILCompare valid IndexNow key file count actual=0 expected="> 0"WARNNo discoverable IndexNow key file was found.

Performance and AccessibilityBest PracticesBrowser audit

Browser errors were logged to the console

100 Fail

Check name

Browser errors were logged to the console

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Device

desktop

Category

Best Practices

Fix guidance

Errors logged to the console indicate unresolved problems. They can come from network request failures and other browser concerns. [Learn more about this errors in console diagnostic audit](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/best-practices/errors-in-console/)

Evidence
{
  "description": "Errors logged to the console indicate unresolved problems. They can come from network request failures and other browser concerns. [Learn more about this errors in console diagnostic audit](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/best-practices/errors-in-console/)"
}

Performance and AccessibilityAccessibilityBrowser audit

SVG elements with an `img` role do not have an accessible text alternative

100 Fail

Check name

SVG elements with an `img` role do not have an accessible text alternative

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Device

desktop

Category

Accessibility

Fix guidance

Ensures SVG elements with an `img`, `graphics-document` or `graphics-symbol` role have an accessible text alternative. [Learn more about SVG alt text](https://dequeuniversity.com/rules/axe/4.11/svg-img-alt).

Evidence
{
  "description": "Ensures SVG elements with an `img`, `graphics-document` or `graphics-symbol` role have an accessible text alternative. [Learn more about SVG alt text](https://dequeuniversity.com/rules/axe/4.11/svg-img-alt)."
}

Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit

Reduce unused JavaScript

50 Fail

Check name

Reduce unused JavaScript

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Device

desktop

Category

Performance

Estimated savings

Est savings of 424 KiB

Fix guidance

Reduce unused JavaScript and defer loading scripts until they are required to decrease bytes consumed by network activity. [Learn how to reduce unused JavaScript](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/unused-javascript/).

Evidence
{
  "description": "Reduce unused JavaScript and defer loading scripts until they are required to decrease bytes consumed by network activity. [Learn how to reduce unused JavaScript](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/unused-javascript/).",
  "displayValue": "Est savings of 424 KiB",
  "numericValue": 160
}

Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit

Legacy JavaScript

25 Warning

Check name

Legacy JavaScript

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Device

desktop

Category

Performance

Estimated savings

Est savings of 13 KiB

Fix guidance

Polyfills and transforms enable older browsers to use new JavaScript features. However, many aren't necessary for modern browsers. Consider modifying your JavaScript build process to not transpile [Baseline](https://web.dev/articles/baseline-and-polyfills) features, unless you know you must support older browsers. [Learn why most sites can deploy ES6+ code without transpiling](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/legacy-javascript)

Evidence
{
  "description": "Polyfills and transforms enable older browsers to use new JavaScript features. However, many aren't necessary for modern browsers. Consider modifying your JavaScript build process to not transpile [Baseline](https://web.dev/articles/baseline-and-polyfills) features, unless you know you must support older browsers. [Learn why most sites can deploy ES6+ code without transpiling](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/legacy-javascript)",
  "displayValue": "Est savings of 13 KiB"
}

Fix with MCP or CLI

Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.

Score history

Public scan score over time

Public reports for this website origin. Select any point or report link to open that canonical report.

1 reports
Public score history report links
Scan dateScoreReadinessReport
57/100Level 3, Bot-AwareCurrent report