CanAgentUse tools

UCP Suite

Validate Universal Commerce Protocol discovery, then test product search, carts, checkout links, and merchant handoff flows.

MCP Playground

Connect to remote MCP servers, inspect tools and resources, test prompts, auth, headers, notifications, and JSON-RPC responses.

A2A Playground

Inspect Agent Cards, validate advertised endpoints, and prepare safe requests for agent-to-agent workflows.

Agent Website Viewer

Enter a public URL and see the roles, names, landmarks, controls, and blockers that shape how AI agents understand the page.

SCANNED
Jul 13, 2026, 8:34 PM
VISIBILITY
Public
Rescan Report
Share Report
Copy Report Link
Export Report
56/100

OVERALL SCORE

Level 3, Bot-Aware

Moderate readiness for AI agents
AIDiscoverability67%Agent Easeof Use55%Security& Trust68%GEO, AIO, AEO66%SEO100%Performance77%Accessibility0%
  • AI Discoverability 67 out of 100
  • Agent Ease of Use 55 out of 100
  • Security & Trust 68 out of 100
  • GEO, AIO and AEO 66 out of 100
  • SEO 100 out of 100
  • Performance 77 out of 100
  • Accessibility 0 out of 100

CAPTURED SCREENSHOT

Captured website desktop screenshot

What AI sees of your website

Toolshero: hét online kennisplatform voor jouw ontwikkeling favicon

Toolshero: hét online kennisplatform voor jouw ontwikkeling

Ontdek 1.200+ praktische artikelen, management modellen, templates en tests voor persoonlijke en professionele ontwikkeling op Toolshero.

Open Agent View

Next step

Turn this report into a fix workflow

1 failed check is ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.

Fix with MCP / CLI
Detailed report scores grouped by capability area
MetricScoreStatusPassedFailedWarningEvidence
AI Discoverability
67
Needs work3221View details
Discoverability
67
Needs work800
Content Readiness
79
Mostly ready2000
Bot Access Control
58
Needs work421View details
Agent Ease of Use
55
Needs work610View details
Auth
54
Needs work300
Skill Discovery
54
Needs work100
Google Agentic Browsing
66
Needs work210View details
GEO, AIO and AEO
66
Needs work900
GEO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable300
AIO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable300
AEO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable300
SEO
100
Strong1000
SEO
100
Strong1000
Security & Trust
68
Needs work1400
Security & Trust
68
Needs work1400
Performance
77
Mostly ready1000
Performance
77
Mostly ready1000
Accessibility
0
Priority fix010View details
Accessibility
0
Priority fix010View details

Prioritized recommendations

Issues ranked by score impact

3 items need attention

AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEmerging recommendation

ai.txt policy

ai.txt policy failed at "Validate transport".

62 Fail

Needs attention

ai.txt policy

Failed check
01

Issue

ai.txt appears to be an HTML page or error document rather than a plain-text policy.

Details

02

Why it matters

ai.txt is a fragmented emerging convention. It can communicate human-readable AI crawling, training, attribution, restriction, and contact guidance, but it is not a standard access-control mechanism and absence should not be penalized.

Check name

ai.txt policy

Score

38/100

Status

fail

Category

Bot Access Control

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish an advisory human-readable AI usage policy only when the site intentionally needs one.

Result

ai.txt policy failed at "Validate transport".

Validation steps

  1. Validate transport

    ai.txt appears to be an HTML page or error document rather than a plain-text policy.

    /ai.txt transport is invalid or not plain text
  2. Parse ai.txt policy

    Transport validation failed before policy parsing could be trusted.

    /ai.txt policy format is missing required sections or non-standard
  3. Validate policy content

    ai.txt does not follow the AI Visibility section model; treating it as non-standard advisory text.

    /ai.txt content is incomplete or unsafe
Evidence log3 steps · 14 lines
Validate transport [fail]! ai.txt appears to be an HTML page or error document rather than a plain-text policy.INFOValidate transportINFOChecking ai.txt media type, size, line count, and whether the response looks like plain text contentType="text/html; charset=UTF-8" length=117528 lineCount=1190FAILCompare media type to preferred text/plain transport actual="text/html" expected="text/plain preferred; readable text required"FAILai.txt appears to be an HTML page or error document rather than a plain-text policy.Parse ai.txt policy [fail]! Transport validation failed before policy parsing could be trusted.INFOParse ai.txt policyINFODetecting ai.txt convention from bracket sections, frontmatter, headings, and ai.txt context linksINFODetected policy structure convention="unknown-text" sections=[] markdownHeadings=[]WARNCheck AI Visibility required sections actual="missing identity, permissions, restrictions" expected="identity, permissions, and restrictions" missingRecommended=["attribution","contact","content-types"]WARNTransport validation failed before policy parsing could be trusted.Validate policy content [warning]! ai.txt does not follow the AI Visibility section model; treating it as non-standard advisory text.INFOValidate policy contentINFOChecking required section content, permission/restriction language, attribution, contact details, and safety risks convention="unknown-text"INFODetected policy signals hasPermissionLanguage=true hasRestrictionLanguage=false hasTrainingLanguage=true hasAttributionLanguage=true hasContact=falseWARNCheck required and recommended section coverage actual={"missingRequired":["identity","permissions","restrictions"],"missingRecommended":["attribution","contact","content-types"]} expected={"missingRequired":[],"recommendedPresentWhenPossible":true}WARNai.txt does not follow the AI Visibility section model; treating it as non-standard advisory text.

Agent Ease of UseGoogle Agentic BrowsingBrowser audit

Accessibility tree is not well-formed

100 Fail

Check name

Accessibility tree is not well-formed

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Device

desktop

Category

Google Agentic Browsing

Fix guidance

A well-formed [accessibility tree](http://goo.gle/lighthouse-agentic-a11y) helps AI agents to navigate and interact with the page.

Evidence
{
  "description": "A well-formed [accessibility tree](http://goo.gle/lighthouse-agentic-a11y) helps AI agents to navigate and interact with the page."
}

AccessibilityAccessibilityBrowser audit

Buttons must have discernible text

100 Fail

Check name

Buttons must have discernible text

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Device

desktop

Category

Accessibility

Fix guidance

Buttons must have discernible text

Evidence
{
  "ruleId": "button-name",
  "impact": "critical",
  "description": "Ensure buttons have discernible text",
  "tags": [
    "cat.name-role-value",
    "wcag2a",
    "wcag412",
    "section508",
    "section508.22.a",
    "TTv5",
    "TT6.a",
    "EN-301-549",
    {
      "truncated": true,
      "omittedCount": 4,
      "originalCount": 12
    }
  ],
  "affectedNodeCount": 1,
  "nodes": [
    {
      "target": [
        "#searchsubmit"
      ],
      "html": {
        "discarded": true,
        "reason": "[discarded fetched document data]",
        "originalType": "string",
        "originalLength": 102
      },
      "failureSummary": "Fix any of the following:\n  Element does not have inner text that is visible to screen readers\n  aria-label attribute does not exist or is empty\n  aria-labelledby attribute does not exist, references elements that do not exist or references elements that are empty\n  Element has no title attribute\n  Element does not have an implicit (wrapped) <label>\n  Element does not have an explicit <label>\n  Element's default semantics were not overridden with role=\"none\" or role=\"presentation\""
    }
  ]
}

Sign in to see 42 other issues and the full report

Create a free account to unlock every issue, evidence details, exports, and higher free limits.

Fix with MCP or CLI

Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.

Fix with MCP / CLI

Score history