CanAgentUse tools

UCP Suite

Validate Universal Commerce Protocol discovery, then test product search, carts, checkout links, and merchant handoff flows.

MCP Playground

Connect to remote MCP servers, inspect tools and resources, test prompts, auth, headers, notifications, and JSON-RPC responses.

A2A Playground

Inspect Agent Cards, validate advertised endpoints, and prepare safe requests for agent-to-agent workflows.

Agent Website Viewer

Enter a public URL and see the roles, names, landmarks, controls, and blockers that shape how AI agents understand the page.

SCANNED
Jul 6, 2026, 6:14 AM
VISIBILITY
Public
Rescan Report
Share Report
Copy Report Link
Export Report
54/100

OVERALL SCORE

Level 3, Bot-Aware

Moderate readiness for AI agents
AIDiscoverability66%Agent Easeof Use47%Security& Trust67%GEO, AIO, AEO65%SEO92%Performance93%Accessibility0%
  • AI Discoverability 66 out of 100
  • Agent Ease of Use 47 out of 100
  • Security & Trust 67 out of 100
  • GEO, AIO and AEO 65 out of 100
  • SEO 92 out of 100
  • Performance 93 out of 100
  • Accessibility 0 out of 100

CAPTURED SCREENSHOT

Captured website desktop screenshot

What AI sees of your website

Avoma — AI Platform for Note-taking, Scheduling & Coaching favicon

Avoma — AI Platform for Note-taking, Scheduling & Coaching

Accelerate your growth with Avoma’s all-in-one AI platform: Automate note-taking, scheduling, call coaching, CRM updates, and more. Pay only for what you need.

Open Agent View

Next step

Turn this report into a fix workflow

2 failed checks are ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.

Fix with MCP / CLI
Detailed report scores grouped by capability area
MetricScoreStatusPassedFailedWarningEvidence
AI Discoverability
66
Needs work3120View details
Discoverability
67
Needs work820View details
Content Readiness
68
Needs work2000
Bot Access Control
63
Needs work300
Agent Ease of Use
47
Priority fix210View details
Google Agentic Browsing
67
Needs work210View details
GEO, AIO and AEO
65
Needs work800
GEO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable300
AIO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable200
AEO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable300
SEO
92
Strong900
SEO
92
Strong900
Security & Trust
67
Needs work1722View details
Security & Trust
67
Needs work1722View details
Performance
93
Strong1400
Performance
93
Strong1400

Prioritized recommendations

Issues ranked by score impact

3 items need attention

AI DiscoverabilityDiscoverabilityEstablished

Link headers

Link headers failed at "Find useful Link headers".

100 Fail

Needs attention

Link headers

Failed check
01

Issue

No useful agent discovery Link headers were found.

Details

02

Why it matters

Link headers let automated clients discover API catalogs, documentation, and machine-readable alternates without parsing page markup first.

Check name

Link headers

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Category

Discoverability

Maturity

Established

Goal

Include Link response headers for agent discovery using RFC 8288.

Result

Link headers failed at "Find useful Link headers".

Validation steps

  1. Find useful Link headers

    No useful agent discovery Link headers were found.

    Link header lacks useful discovery relations
  2. Fetch same-origin Link header targets

    Link headers did not expose any same-origin targets to validate.

    Link header targets are unreachable or media types mismatch
Evidence log2 steps · 14 lines
Find useful Link headers [fail]! No useful agent discovery Link headers were found.INFOFind useful Link headersINFOParse response Link header linkCount=5FAILCompare registered agent-useful relation count actual=0 expected="> 0"FAILCompare community relation count actual=0 expected="accepted as weaker evidence"INFOIgnored non-discovery Link relation rel="preconnect" url="https://cdn.prod.website-files.com"INFOIgnored non-discovery Link relation rel="preload" url="https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/5de236b4d41434460ade73ac/css/avoma.shared.9ed03bf99.min.css"INFOIgnored non-discovery Link relation rel="preconnect" url="https://fonts.googleapis.com"INFOIgnored non-discovery Link relation rel="preconnect" url="https://fonts.gstatic.com"INFOIgnored non-discovery Link relation rel="preload" url="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/@splidejs/[email protected]/dist/css/splide.min.css"FAILNo useful agent discovery Link headers were found.Fetch same-origin Link header targets [fail]! Link headers did not expose any same-origin targets to validate.INFOFetch same-origin Link header targetsINFOFetch same-origin Link header targets and record external skipsFAILCompare same-origin Link target failures actual=1 expected=0FAILLink headers did not expose any same-origin targets to validate.

Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished

Content-Security-Policy

Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate fetch baseline".

50 Fail

Needs attention

Content-Security-Policy

Failed check
01

Issue

CSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback.

Details

02

Why it matters

Content Security Policy reduces the impact of injection bugs by limiting where scripts, styles, frames, forms, and other browser resources can load or execute.

Check name

Content-Security-Policy

Score

50/100

Status

fail

Category

Security & Trust

Maturity

Established

Goal

Constrain browser resource loading and script execution with an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.

Result

Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate fetch baseline".

Validation steps

  1. Evaluate fetch baseline

    CSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback.

    CSP fetch baseline is too broad or missing
  2. Evaluate script execution

    No script-src or default-src directive constrains script execution.

    CSP script execution policy is unsafe
  3. Review hardening directives

    CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri.

    CSP hardening directives are missing or weak
  4. Review CSP reporting

    CSP does not define a reporting endpoint.

    CSP reporting is missing or incomplete
Evidence log4 steps · 16 lines
Evaluate fetch baseline [fail]! CSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback.INFOEvaluate fetch baselineINFOEvaluate resource loading fallback explicitFetchDirectives=[]FAILCompare fetch baseline actual="0 explicit fetch directives" expected="restricted default-src or broad explicit fetch coverage" issue="CSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback."FAILCSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback.Evaluate script execution [fail]! No script-src or default-src directive constrains script execution.INFOEvaluate script executionINFOInspect effective script directive FAILCompare script execution posture actual={"hasNonce":false,"hasHash":false,"hasStrictDynamic":false,"hasUnsafeInline":false,"hasUnsafeEval":false,"hasWildcardHost":false,"hasBroadScheme":false,"dangerousSchemes":[]} expected="constrained script sources without unsafe execution allowances" issue="No script-src or default-src directive constrains script execution."FAILNo script-src or default-src directive constrains script execution.Review hardening directives [warning]! CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri.INFOReview hardening directivesINFOInspect CSP hardening directives frameAncestors=["'self'"] formCount=0WARNCompare recommended hardening coverage actual=["object-src","base-uri"] expected="no missing object-src/base-uri/form-action requirements" issue="CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri."WARNCSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri.Review CSP reporting [warning]! CSP does not define a reporting endpoint.INFOReview CSP reportingINFOInspect CSP reporting directives reportOnlyHeaderPresent=false reportOnlyDirectives=[]WARNCompare violation reporting configuration actual="no reporting endpoint" expected="report-to or report-uri present" issue="CSP does not define a reporting endpoint."WARNCSP does not define a reporting endpoint.

Agent Ease of UseGoogle Agentic BrowsingBrowser audit

Accessibility tree is not well-formed

100 Fail

Check name

Accessibility tree is not well-formed

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Device

desktop

Category

Google Agentic Browsing

Fix guidance

A well-formed [accessibility tree](http://goo.gle/lighthouse-agentic-a11y) helps AI agents to navigate and interact with the page.

Evidence
{
  "description": "A well-formed [accessibility tree](http://goo.gle/lighthouse-agentic-a11y) helps AI agents to navigate and interact with the page."
}

Sign in to see 37 other issues and the full report

Create a free account to unlock every issue, evidence details, exports, and higher free limits.

Email code

Fix with MCP or CLI

Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.

Fix with MCP / CLI

Score history

Public scan score over time

Public reports for this website origin. Select any point or report link to open that canonical report.

2 reports
Public score history report links
Scan dateScoreReadinessReport
61/100Level 3, Bot-AwareView report
54/100Level 3, Bot-AwareCurrent report