Rescan Report
Share Report
Copy Report Link
Rescan Report
Share Report
Copy Report Link
Export Report
59/100

OVERALL SCORE

Level 3, Bot-Aware

Moderate readiness for AI agents
AIDiscoverability35%Agent Easeof Use50%Security& Trust80%GEO, AIO, AEO64%SEO100%Performance& Accessibility97%
  • AI Discoverability 35 out of 100
  • Agent Ease of Use 50 out of 100
  • Security & Trust 80 out of 100
  • GEO, AIO and AEO 64 out of 100
  • SEO 100 out of 100
  • Performance and Accessibility 97 out of 100

CAPTURED SCREENSHOT

Captured website desktop screenshot

What AI sees of your website

Citus Data | Distributed Postgres. At any scale. - Citus Data favicon

Citus Data | Distributed Postgres. At any scale. - Citus Data

Citus gives you all the greatness of Postgres plus the superpowers of distributed tables. By distributing your data and queries, your application gets high performance—at any scale. The Citus database is available as open source and as a m...

Next step

Turn this report into a fix workflow

9 failed checks are ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.

Detailed report scores grouped by capability area
MetricScoreStatusPassedFailedWarningEvidence
AI Discoverability
35
Priority fix15237View details
Discoverability
33
Priority fix540View details
Content Readiness
33
Priority fix10174View details
Bot Access Control
38
Priority fix023View details
Agent Ease of Use
50
Needs work008
MCP
50
Needs work003
Skill Discovery
50
Needs work005
GEO, AIO and AEO
64
Needs work828View details
GEO Readiness
56
Needs work213View details
AIO Readiness
74
Needs work303
AEO Readiness
62
Needs work312View details
SEO
100
Strong800
SEO
100
Strong800
Security & Trust
80
Mostly ready1814View details
Security & Trust
80
Mostly ready1814View details
Performance and Accessibility
97
Strong2611View details
Performance
98
Strong1611View details
Accessibility
94
Strong1000

Prioritized recommendations

Issues ranked by score impact

35 items need attention

AI DiscoverabilityDiscoverabilityEstablished

Link headers

Link headers failed at "Find useful Link headers".

50 Fail

Needs attention

Link headers

Failed check
01

Issue

No useful agent discovery Link headers were found.

02

Why it matters

Link headers let automated clients discover API catalogs, documentation, and machine-readable alternates without parsing page markup first.

Check name

Link headers

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Category

Discoverability

Maturity

Established

Goal

Include Link response headers for agent discovery using RFC 8288.

Result

Link headers failed at "Find useful Link headers".

Validation steps

  1. Find useful Link headers

    No useful agent discovery Link headers were found.

  2. Fetch same-origin Link header targets

    Link headers did not expose any same-origin targets to validate.

Evidence log2 steps · 9 lines
Find useful Link headers [fail]! No useful agent discovery Link headers were found.INFOFind useful Link headersINFOParse response Link header linkCount=0FAILCompare registered agent-useful relation count actual=0 expected="> 0"FAILCompare community relation count actual=0 expected="accepted as weaker evidence"FAILNo useful agent discovery Link headers were found.Fetch same-origin Link header targets [fail]! Link headers did not expose any same-origin targets to validate.INFOFetch same-origin Link header targetsINFOFetch same-origin Link header targets and record external skipsFAILCompare same-origin Link target failures actual=1 expected=0FAILLink headers did not expose any same-origin targets to validate.

AI DiscoverabilityDiscoverabilityEstablished

robots.txt

robots.txt failed at "Fetch robots.txt".

50 Fail

Needs attention

robots.txt

Failed check
01

Issue

Failed to fetch /robots.txt (Status: 404).

02

Why it matters

robots.txt gives crawlers and agents a standard place to read crawl permissions, disallowed paths, and sitemap locations before requesting site content.

Check name

robots.txt

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Category

Discoverability

Maturity

Established

Goal

Publish /robots.txt with clear crawl rules.

Result

robots.txt failed at "Fetch robots.txt".

Validation steps

  1. Fetch robots.txt

    Failed to fetch /robots.txt (Status: 404).

  2. Validate RFC 9309 core syntax

    robots.txt was found but did not contain a valid, parseable User-agent group.

Evidence log2 steps · 9 lines
Fetch robots.txt [fail]! Failed to fetch /robots.txt (Status: 404).INFOFetch robots.txtINFORequesting /robots.txt from the site originFAILCompare HTTP response status actual=404 expected="2xx successful response" contentType="text/html"FAILFailed to fetch /robots.txt (Status: 404). statusCode=404Validate RFC 9309 core syntax [fail]! robots.txt was found but did not contain a valid, parseable User-agent group.INFOValidate RFC 9309 core syntaxINFOParsing robots.txt into User-agent groups and Allow/Disallow recordsFAILCheck User-agent group count actual=0 expected=">= 1 parseable group" parsedUserAgents=[]FAILCheck malformed lines and orphan Allow/Disallow records actual={"invalidLines":12,"orphanRecords":0} expected={"invalidLines":0,"orphanRecords":0}FAILrobots.txt contains malformed lines invalidLines=[{"raw":"document.documentElement.classList.remove(\"no-js\");","line":2},{"raw":"var cookieName=\"CitusPromoCookiecitus14\",hideTop=document.querySelector(\"#hideTop\"),promoLink=document.querySelector(\".promo-text a\"),closePromo=function(){slideUp(document.getElementById(\"topbar\")),setCookie(cookieName,\"Notified\",30),dataLayer.push({event:\"eventTracking\",category:\"notification bar\",action:\"close\",label:\"citus14 (/404/)\"}),dataLayer.push({event:\"notification_bar\",action:\"close notification\",label:\"citus14\"})},clickPromo=function(){dataLayer.push({event:\"eventTracking\",category:\"notification bar\",action:\"click \"+event.target.href,label:\"citus14 (/404/)\"}),dataLayer.push({event:\"notification_bar\",action:\"click promo link \"+event.target.href,label:\"citus14\"})};hideTop.addEventListener(\"click\",closePromo),promoLink.addEventListener(\"click\",clickPromo),null==getCookie(cookieName)&&show(document.getElementById(\"topbar\"))","line":4},{"raw":"</script> <script>","line":5},{"raw":"window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || [];","line":6},{"raw":"window.ga=window.ga||function(){(ga.q=ga.q||[]).push(arguments)};ga.l=+new Date;","line":8}]

AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEstablished

AI bot rules in robots.txt

AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Fetch robots.txt".

25 Fail

Needs attention

AI bot rules in robots.txt

Failed check
01

Issue

No robots.txt content was available to inspect for AI bot rules.

02

Why it matters

AI crawler product tokens have different meanings. Explicit robots.txt groups make training, search, and retrieval access policy auditable for compliant crawler operators.

Check name

AI bot rules in robots.txt

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Category

Bot Access Control

Maturity

Established

Goal

Declare deliberate robots.txt rules for major AI training, AI search, user-triggered, and dataset crawlers.

Result

AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Fetch robots.txt".

Validation steps

  1. Fetch robots.txt

    No robots.txt content was available to inspect for AI bot rules.

  2. Classify AI crawler rules

    No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.

Evidence log2 steps · 10 lines
Fetch robots.txt [fail]! No robots.txt content was available to inspect for AI bot rules.INFOFetch robots.txtINFORequesting /robots.txt from the site originFAILCheck whether robots.txt content is available actual="no content" expected="content returned" length=0FAILNo robots.txt content was available to inspect for AI bot rules.Classify AI crawler rules [fail]! No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.INFOClassify AI crawler rulesINFOParsing User-agent groups and Allow/Disallow records for known AI crawler tokens evaluatedPath="/"INFOEvaluating exact User-agent matches before wildcard fallback exactAiPolicyCount=0 totalCrawlerTokens=18FAILNo explicit AI crawler User-agent groups were found examplesExpected=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ClaudeBot","Google-Extended","CCBot"]FAILCompare explicit AI crawler coverage actual=0 expected="> 0 explicit non-search AI crawler policies" missingTokens=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ChatGPT-User","ClaudeBot","Claude-SearchBot","Claude-User","Google-Extended","Applebot-Extended","Amazonbot","Amzn-SearchBot","Amzn-User","PerplexityBot"]INFOResolved effective root-path policy for crawler tokens blocked=0 allowed=0 unspecified=21

Agent Ease of UseMCPEmerging recommendation

MCP Server Card

MCP Server Card has a validation warning at "Discover MCP server card".

25 Warning

Needs attention

MCP Server Card

Warning
01

Issue

No MCP server card was found at current, transitional, or linked discovery paths.

02

Why it matters

MCP server cards give agents a stable, public pre-connection discovery surface for server identity, remote transports, protocol compatibility, and safe routing without guessing endpoints.

Check name

MCP Server Card

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

MCP

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish an MCP Server Card that helps agents discover remote MCP server transports before opening a session.

Result

MCP Server Card has a validation warning at "Discover MCP server card".

Validation steps

  1. Discover MCP server card

    No MCP server card was found at current, transitional, or linked discovery paths.

Evidence log1 step · 14 lines
Discover MCP server card [warning]! No MCP server card was found at current, transitional, or linked discovery paths.INFODiscover MCP server card candidateCount=5INFOBuild MCP server-card candidate list currentPath="/.well-known/mcp-server-card" transitionalPaths=["/.well-known/mcp/server-card.json","/.well-known/mcp/server-cards.json","/mcp.json","/.well-known/mcp.json"] linkedPaths=[]PASSCheck whether page claims MCP support actual=false expected="true only when HTML or Link headers mention MCP" textMatches=[] headerLinkCount=0INFOTrying to fetch /.well-known/mcp-server-card url="https://www.citusdata.com/.well-known/mcp-server-card" source="current"FAIL/.well-known/mcp-server-card did not return a usable server card statusCode=404 contentType="text/html"INFOTrying to fetch /.well-known/mcp/server-card.json url="https://www.citusdata.com/.well-known/mcp/server-card.json" source="transitional"FAIL/.well-known/mcp/server-card.json did not return a usable server card statusCode=404 contentType="text/html"INFOTrying to fetch /.well-known/mcp/server-cards.json url="https://www.citusdata.com/.well-known/mcp/server-cards.json" source="transitional"FAIL/.well-known/mcp/server-cards.json did not return a usable server card statusCode=404 contentType="text/html"INFOTrying to fetch /mcp.json url="https://www.citusdata.com/mcp.json" source="transitional"FAIL/mcp.json did not return a usable server card statusCode=404 contentType="text/html"INFOTrying to fetch /.well-known/mcp.json url="https://www.citusdata.com/.well-known/mcp.json" source="transitional"FAIL/.well-known/mcp.json did not return a usable server card statusCode=404 contentType="text/html"WARNNo MCP server card was found reason="No MCP server card was found at current, transitional, or linked discovery paths."

Agent Ease of UseMCPEmerging recommendation

WebMCP

WebMCP has a validation warning at "Probe WebMCP operability".

25 Warning

Needs attention

WebMCP

Warning
01

Issue

No WebMCP surface was found to probe.

Details

02

Why it matters

WebMCP gives agents structured page and browser tool hints so they can understand actions without relying only on screen scraping.

Check name

WebMCP

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

MCP

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Expose browser/page WebMCP tools and compatible static WebMCP metadata when a site wants agents to understand in-page actions.

Result

WebMCP has a validation warning at "Probe WebMCP operability".

Validation steps

  1. Detect WebMCP runtime API

    Expose current WebMCP tools through document.modelContext.registerTool(), or clearly document navigator.modelContext as a compatibility/polyfill profile.

  2. Probe WebMCP operability

    No WebMCP surface was found to probe.

    WebMCP operability findings
    • No WebMCP surface was found to probe.
    • Conventional WebMCP manifest paths were checked but did not return a valid manifest.
  3. Validate declarative WebMCP form tools

    No W3C-style declarative WebMCP form attributes were found.

  4. Validate MCP-aware HTML annotations

    No data-mcp-tool or hyphenated WebMCP compatibility annotations were found.

  5. Validate static WebMCP JSON compatibility

    No static WebMCP JSON manifest or WMCP interaction graph was found.

  6. Validate WebMCP tool metadata quality

    Use clear tool names, useful descriptions, constrained schemas, side-effect clarity, and profile-appropriate naming.

  7. Review WebMCP security and policy signals

    Remove secrets and prompt-injection text from WebMCP metadata, avoid private endpoints, and use Permissions-Policy and annotations for tool safety.

Evidence log7 steps · 32 lines
Detect WebMCP runtime API [informational]INFODetect WebMCP runtime API status="informational"INFOProbe rendered browser for WebMCP runtime objects SKIPCheck current W3C runtime API actual="not detected" expected="document.modelContext/registerTool available"INFOWebMCP evidence was recorded for context. status="informational"Probe WebMCP operability [warning]! No WebMCP surface was found to probe.INFOProbe WebMCP operability status="warning"INFORun safe WebMCP operability checks safeProbeOnly=trueWARNCheck usable WebMCP evidence actual=0 expected="at least 1 usable runtime, declarative, annotation, or static manifest signal"WARNWebMCP operability warning warning="No WebMCP surface was found to probe."WARNWebMCP operability warning warning="Conventional WebMCP manifest paths were checked but did not return a valid manifest."WARNNo WebMCP surface was found to probe.Validate declarative WebMCP form tools [informational]! No W3C-style declarative WebMCP form attributes were found.INFOValidate declarative WebMCP form tools status="informational"INFOInspect visible forms and controls for current declarative WebMCP attributes annotatedElements=0 formsWithAttributes=0 controlsWithAttributes=0SKIPValidate declarative WebMCP attribute quality actual=0 expected=0INFONo W3C-style declarative WebMCP form attributes were found. status="informational"Validate MCP-aware HTML annotations [informational]! No data-mcp-tool or hyphenated WebMCP compatibility annotations were found.INFOValidate MCP-aware HTML annotations status="informational"INFOInspect HTML for MCP compatibility annotations compatibilityAttributeCount=0 dataMcpToolCount=0 examples=[]SKIPValidate compatibility annotation quality actual=0 expected=0INFONo data-mcp-tool or hyphenated WebMCP compatibility annotations were found. status="informational"Validate static WebMCP JSON compatibility [warning]! No static WebMCP JSON manifest or WMCP interaction graph was found.INFOValidate static WebMCP JSON compatibility status="warning"INFODiscover static WebMCP manifest candidates conventionalPaths=["/.well-known/webmcp.json","/webmcp.json"] checkedCount=2 profileCounts={}INFOWebMCP manifest candidate checked source="path" path="/.well-known/webmcp.json" url="https://www.citusdata.com/.well-known/webmcp.json" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html"INFOWebMCP manifest candidate checked source="path" path="/webmcp.json" url="https://www.citusdata.com/webmcp.json" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html"WARNValidate discovered static WebMCP metadata actual={"validManifestCount":0,"invalidManifestCount":0,"toolCount":0,"wmcpActionCount":0} expected="at least 1 valid tools[] manifest or WMCP graph when static metadata is present"WARNNo static WebMCP JSON manifest or WMCP interaction graph was found.Validate WebMCP tool metadata quality [informational]INFOValidate WebMCP tool metadata quality status="informational"INFOInspect WebMCP tool names, descriptions, schemas, and safety hints toolCount=0SKIPCheck tool metadata findings actual={"issueCount":0,"warningCount":0} expected="0 issues and 0 warnings"INFOWebMCP evidence was recorded for context. status="informational"Review WebMCP security and policy signals [informational]INFOReview WebMCP security and policy signals status="informational"INFOInspect WebMCP security and policy signals permissionsPolicy="geolocation=(), microphone=(), camera=()" failureCount=0 warningCount=0PASSCheck security findings actual={"failures":0,"warnings":0} expected="0 failures and 0 warnings"INFOWebMCP evidence was recorded for context. status="informational"

AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEmerging recommendation

llms.txt

llms.txt failed at "Fetch root llms.txt".

17 Fail

Needs attention

llms.txt

Failed check
01

Issue

/llms.txt was not found or could not be fetched.

02

Why it matters

llms.txt is an emerging Markdown convention for giving language-model clients curated context and links before they crawl broadly. Broken, private, or low-signal links make the file much less useful even when it exists.

Check name

llms.txt

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Category

Content Readiness

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish a concise llms.txt index that helps agents discover useful public site context.

Result

llms.txt failed at "Fetch root llms.txt".

Validation steps

  1. Fetch root llms.txt

    /llms.txt was not found or could not be fetched.

  2. Inspect optional llms-full.txt

    Passed.

Evidence log2 steps · 7 lines
Fetch root llms.txt [fail]! /llms.txt was not found or could not be fetched.INFOFetch root llms.txt path="/llms.txt"INFOTrying to fetch /llms.txt url="https://www.citusdata.com/llms.txt"FAIL/llms.txt was not found or could not be fetched statusCode=404FAILFetch root llms.txt failed reason="/llms.txt is required for this check."Inspect optional llms-full.txt [informational]INFOInspect optional llms-full.txtINFOTrying to fetch /llms-full.txt url="https://www.citusdata.com/llms-full.txt"SKIP/llms-full.txt is not present statusCode=404

AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished

Organization / WebSite schema

Organization / WebSite schema is missing or incomplete.

17 Fail

Needs attention

Organization / WebSite schema

Failed check
01

Issue

No Organization or Organization subtype was found in Schema.org structured data. No WebSite entity was found in Schema.org structured data. Missing identity field(s): Organization.name, Organization.url, WebSite.name, WebSite.url. WebSite.publisher is missing. Organization schema is missing logo and sameAs or public contact evidence.

02

Why it matters

Organization and WebSite schema help agents identify the publisher, canonical site identity, logo, and related profiles for attribution.

Check name

Organization / WebSite schema

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Category

Content Readiness

Maturity

Established

Goal

Identify the site owner and website entity in structured data.

Result

Organization / WebSite schema is missing or incomplete.

Validation steps

  1. Organization entity

    No Organization or Organization subtype was found in Schema.org structured data.

  2. WebSite entity

    No WebSite entity was found in Schema.org structured data.

  3. Identity fields

    Missing identity field(s): Organization.name, Organization.url, WebSite.name, WebSite.url.

  4. WebSite publisher linkage

    WebSite.publisher is missing.

  5. Organization trust fields

    Organization schema is missing logo and sameAs or public contact evidence.

Evidence log5 steps · 23 lines
Organization entity [fail]! No Organization or Organization subtype was found in Schema.org structured data.INFOOrganization entityINFOLooking for Organization or Organization subtype in structured data observedTypes=[]FAILCheck Organization entity presence actual=false expected=true fields=[{"name":"Organization.@type","present":false},{"name":"Organization.@id","present":false},{"name":"Organization.name","present":false},{"name":"Organization.url","present":false},{"name":"Organization.logo","present":false},{"name":"Organization.sameAs","present":false}]FAILOrganization entity is missingWebSite entity [fail]! No WebSite entity was found in Schema.org structured data.INFOWebSite entityINFOLooking for WebSite entity in structured data FAILCheck WebSite entity presence actual=false expected=true fields=[{"name":"WebSite.@type","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.@id","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.name","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.url","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.publisher.@id","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.publisher.name","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.publisher.url","present":false}]FAILWebSite entity is missingIdentity fields [fail]! Missing identity field(s): Organization.name, Organization.url, WebSite.name, WebSite.url.INFOIdentity fieldsINFOChecking Organization and WebSite name/url fields FAILCheck required identity fields actual=0 expected=4 missing=["Organization.name","Organization.url","WebSite.name","WebSite.url"] organizationFields=[{"name":"Organization.@type","present":false},{"name":"Organization.@id","present":false},{"name":"Organization.name","present":false},{"name":"Organization.url","present":false},{"name":"Organization.logo","present":false},{"name":"Organization.sameAs","present":false}] websiteFields=[{"name":"WebSite.@type","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.@id","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.name","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.url","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.publisher.@id","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.publisher.name","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.publisher.url","present":false}]WARNCheck identity URLs match scanned origin actual={"organizationUrlMatchesOrigin":false,"websiteUrlMatchesOrigin":false} expected={"organizationUrlMatchesOrigin":true,"websiteUrlMatchesOrigin":true}FAILIdentity fields are missing missing=["Organization.name","Organization.url","WebSite.name","WebSite.url"]WebSite publisher linkage [fail]! WebSite.publisher is missing.INFOWebSite publisher linkageINFOChecking whether WebSite.publisher points to the Organization entity FAILCheck publisher presence actual=false expected=true publisher={"present":false,"matchesOrganization":false} website={} organization={}FAILCheck publisher matches Organization actual=false expected=trueFAILWebSite publisher is missingOrganization trust fields [fail]! Organization schema is missing logo and sameAs or public contact evidence.INFOOrganization trust fieldsINFOChecking logo, sameAs, and public contact evidence FAILCheck logo presence actual=false expected=true fields=[{"name":"Organization.logo","present":false},{"name":"Organization.sameAs","present":false},{"name":"Organization.contactPoint","present":false},{"name":"Organization.telephone","present":false},{"name":"Organization.email","present":false},{"name":"Organization.address","present":false}]FAILCheck sameAs or contact evidence actual=0 expected=">= 1" sameAsCount=0 contactSignalCount=0 fields=[{"name":"Organization.logo","present":false},{"name":"Organization.sameAs","present":false},{"name":"Organization.contactPoint","present":false},{"name":"Organization.telephone","present":false},{"name":"Organization.email","present":false},{"name":"Organization.address","present":false}]FAILOrganization trust fields are missing

Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished

Content-Security-Policy

Content-Security-Policy failed at "Find enforcing CSP delivery".

15 Fail

Needs attention

Content-Security-Policy

Failed check
01

Issue

Applicable HTML response is missing an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.

02

Why it matters

Content Security Policy reduces the impact of injection bugs by limiting where scripts, styles, frames, forms, and other browser resources can load or execute.

Check name

Content-Security-Policy

Score

40/100

Status

fail

Category

Security & Trust

Maturity

Established

Goal

Constrain browser resource loading and script execution with an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.

Result

Content-Security-Policy failed at "Find enforcing CSP delivery".

Validation steps

  1. Find enforcing CSP delivery

    Applicable HTML response is missing an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.

Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Find enforcing CSP delivery [fail]! Applicable HTML response is missing an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.INFOFind enforcing CSP deliveryINFORead CSP delivery headers enforcingHeader="missing" reportOnlyHeader="missing" metaPolicyCount=0 legacyHeadersPresent=[]FAILRequire enforcing Content-Security-Policy header actual="missing" expected="present" issue="Applicable HTML response is missing an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header."FAILApplicable HTML response is missing an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.

AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished

Markdown negotiation

Markdown negotiation is missing or incomplete.

15 Fail

Needs attention

Markdown negotiation

Failed check
01

Issue

Best candidate returned Content-Type "text/html" instead of text/markdown.

02

Why it matters

Markdown representations give agents a cleaner page form while preserving normal HTML for browsers and cache-safe representation handling.

Check name

Markdown negotiation

Score

10/100

Status

fail

Category

Content Readiness

Maturity

Established

Goal

Expose a useful Markdown representation through negotiation or an explicit alternate URL.

Result

Markdown negotiation is missing or incomplete.

Validation steps

  1. Markdown representation

    No usable Markdown representation was found through negotiation, advertised alternates, or conservative .md mirror checks.

  2. Same-URL negotiation

    Same-URL Accept: text/markdown did not return a valid Markdown representation.

  3. Markdown format validation

    Markdown response contains too much raw HTML to be a clean agent-facing Markdown representation.

  4. Advertised Markdown alternate

    No Link or HTML rel=alternate text/markdown URL was advertised.

  5. Conventional .md mirror

    Conventional .md mirror candidates did not return valid Markdown.

Evidence log5 steps · 15 lines
Markdown representation [fail]! No usable Markdown representation was found through negotiation, advertised alternates, or conservative .md mirror checks.INFOMarkdown representationFAILCheck usable Markdown representation was selected actual={"source":"negotiated","url":"https://www.citusdata.com/","statusCode":200,"contentType":"text/html","mediaType":"text/html","vary":"Accept-Encoding","requireVaryAccept":true,"contentTypeStatus":"fail","cacheStatus":"fail","bodyStatus":"fail","pass":false,"quality":{"valid":false,"formatStatus":"fail","dialect":"html-heavy","hasHeading":false,"headingCount":0,"wordCount":3843,"features":{"markdownLinks":0,"referenceLinks":0,"listItems":0,"tables":0,"taskListItems":0,"fencedCodeBlocks":0,"yamlFrontmatter":false,"jsonLdFencedBlocks":0,"admonitions":0,"strikethrough":0,"autolinks":0,"rawHtmlTags":466,"jsxOrMdxSignals":0},"issues":["missing-heading","raw-html-heavy","plain-text-like"],"excerpt":"<!DOCTYPE html> <html class='no-js' lang='en' xml:lang='en'> <head> <meta charset=\"utf-8\"/> <meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1,shrink-to-fit=no\"/> <meta http-equiv=\"X-UA-Compatible\" content=\"IE=edge,chrome=1\"/","issue":"Markdown response contains too much raw HTML to be a clean agent-facing Markdown representation."}} expected="negotiated, advertised alternate, or conventional mirror" selected={"source":"negotiated","url":"https://www.citusdata.com/","statusCode":200,"contentType":"text/html","mediaType":"text/html","vary":"Accept-Encoding","requireVaryAccept":true,"contentTypeStatus":"fail","cacheStatus":"fail","bodyStatus":"fail","pass":false,"quality":{"valid":false,"formatStatus":"fail","dialect":"html-heavy","hasHeading":false,"headingCount":0,"wordCount":3843,"features":{"markdownLinks":0,"referenceLinks":0,"listItems":0,"tables":0,"taskListItems":0,"fencedCodeBlocks":0,"yamlFrontmatter":false,"jsonLdFencedBlocks":0,"admonitions":0,"strikethrough":0,"autolinks":0,"rawHtmlTags":466,"jsxOrMdxSignals":0},"issues":["missing-heading","raw-html-heavy","plain-text-like"],"excerpt":"<!DOCTYPE html> <html class='no-js' lang='en' xml:lang='en'> <head> <meta charset=\"utf-8\"/> <meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1,shrink-to-fit=no\"/> <meta http-equiv=\"X-UA-Compatible\" content=\"IE=edge,chrome=1\"/","issue":"Markdown response contains too much raw HTML to be a clean agent-facing Markdown representation."}} candidatesChecked=2FAILMarkdown representation failed issue="No usable Markdown representation was found through negotiation, advertised alternates, or conservative .md mirror checks."Same-URL negotiation [fail]! Same-URL Accept: text/markdown did not return a valid Markdown representation.INFOSame-URL negotiationFAILCheck negotiated Markdown response actual={"statusCode":200,"mediaType":"text/html","vary":"Accept-Encoding"} expected="HTTP 2xx text/markdown with Vary: Accept" url="https://www.citusdata.com/" statusCode=200 mediaType="text/html" vary="Accept-Encoding"FAILSame-URL negotiation failed issue="Same-URL Accept: text/markdown did not return a valid Markdown representation."Markdown format validation [fail]! Markdown response contains too much raw HTML to be a clean agent-facing Markdown representation.INFOMarkdown format validationFAILCheck Markdown body quality actual={"valid":false,"wordCount":3843,"headingCount":0,"dialect":"html-heavy"} expected="valid Markdown with substantive text and headings" valid=false dialect="html-heavy" wordCount=3843 headingCount=0FAILMarkdown format validation failed issue="Markdown response contains too much raw HTML to be a clean agent-facing Markdown representation."Advertised Markdown alternate [warning]! No Link or HTML rel=alternate text/markdown URL was advertised.INFOAdvertised Markdown alternateWARNCheck advertised Markdown alternate candidates actual=0 expected="> 0 when HTML advertises a Markdown alternate" advertisedUrls=[] candidateCount=0WARNAdvertised Markdown alternate has a warning issue="No Link or HTML rel=alternate text/markdown URL was advertised."Conventional .md mirror [fail]! Conventional .md mirror candidates did not return valid Markdown.INFOConventional .md mirrorFAILCheck conventional Markdown mirror candidates actual=1 expected="> 0 when a conventional mirror is discoverable" conventionalUrls=["https://www.citusdata.com/index.html.md"] candidateCount=1FAILConventional .md mirror failed issue="Conventional .md mirror candidates did not return valid Markdown."

Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation

A2A Agent Card

A2A Agent Card has a validation warning at "Discover A2A Agent Card".

13 Warning

Needs attention

A2A Agent Card

Warning
01

Issue

No A2A Agent Card was found at the current, legacy, or fallback discovery paths.

02

Why it matters

A2A Agent Cards provide protocol-specific discovery for agent identity, skills, input and output modes, transport bindings, capabilities, and security requirements. Legacy A2A also used /.well-known/agent.json, so scanners must classify the card shape before reporting readiness.

Check name

A2A Agent Card

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

Skill Discovery

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish a version-appropriate A2A Agent Card so A2A-compatible clients can discover agent skills and invoke the declared endpoint safely.

Result

A2A Agent Card has a validation warning at "Discover A2A Agent Card".

Validation steps

  1. Discover A2A Agent Card

    No A2A Agent Card was found at the current, legacy, or fallback discovery paths.

Evidence log1 step · 8 lines
Discover A2A Agent Card [warning]! No A2A Agent Card was found at the current, legacy, or fallback discovery paths.INFODiscover A2A Agent CardINFOTry A2A discovery paths in priority order paths=["/.well-known/agent-card.json","/.well-known/agent.json","/agent-card.json","/.well-known/a2a/agent-card.json"]WARNA2A candidate path did not return a usable card path="/.well-known/agent-card.json" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html"WARNA2A candidate path did not return a usable card path="/.well-known/agent.json" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html"WARNA2A candidate path did not return a usable card path="/agent-card.json" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html"WARNA2A candidate path did not return a usable card path="/.well-known/a2a/agent-card.json" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html"WARNNo A2A Agent Card candidate was selectedWARNNo A2A Agent Card was found at the current, legacy, or fallback discovery paths.

Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation

Agent Skills index

Agent Skills index has a validation warning at "Discover Agent Skills index".

13 Warning

Needs attention

Agent Skills index

Warning
01

Issue

No Agent Skills discovery index was found at the canonical or legacy path.

02

Why it matters

An Agent Skills index lets agents discover task-specific instructions through a small trusted index, then verify and load only the skill artifacts they need.

Check name

Agent Skills index

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

Skill Discovery

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish an Agent Skills discovery index that advertises digest-pinned SKILL.md or archive artifacts.

Result

Agent Skills index has a validation warning at "Discover Agent Skills index".

Validation steps

  1. Discover Agent Skills index

    No Agent Skills discovery index was found at the canonical or legacy path.

Evidence log1 step · 5 lines
Discover Agent Skills index [warning]! No Agent Skills discovery index was found at the canonical or legacy path.INFODiscover Agent Skills indexINFOTry Agent Skills index paths in priority order paths=["/.well-known/agent-skills/index.json","/.well-known/skills/index.json"]WARNAgent Skills index candidate was not usable path="/.well-known/agent-skills/index.json" url="https://www.citusdata.com/.well-known/agent-skills/index.json" statusCode=404WARNAgent Skills index candidate was not usable path="/.well-known/skills/index.json" url="https://www.citusdata.com/.well-known/skills/index.json" statusCode=404WARNNo Agent Skills discovery index was found at the canonical or legacy path.

Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation

agents.json

agents.json has a validation warning at "Discover agents.json".

13 Warning

Needs attention

agents.json

Warning
01

Issue

No Wildcard-style agents.json file was found.

02

Why it matters

Wildcard agents.json gives agents workflow-level context beyond plain OpenAPI, including flows, links, examples, and API action structure. It is an emerging OpenAPI-adjacent proposal, so scanners should validate the contract shape without treating it as an A2A or IETF standard.

Check name

agents.json

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

Skill Discovery

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish a Wildcard-style agents.json file so agents can discover OpenAPI-backed workflows, links, examples, and authentication requirements.

Result

agents.json has a validation warning at "Discover agents.json".

Validation steps

  1. Discover agents.json

    No Wildcard-style agents.json file was found.

Evidence log1 step · 6 lines
Discover agents.json [warning]! No Wildcard-style agents.json file was found.INFODiscover agents.jsonINFOTry agents.json discovery paths in priority order paths=["/.well-known/agents.json","/agents.json"]WARNagents.json candidate path did not return a usable contract path="/.well-known/agents.json" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html"WARNagents.json candidate path did not return a usable contract path="/agents.json" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html"WARNNo agents.json candidate was selectedWARNNo Wildcard-style agents.json file was found.

AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlInformational

Content Signal

Content Signal has a validation warning at "Validate declared usage preferences".

13 Warning

Needs attention

Content Signal

Warning
01

Issue

No Content-Usage or Content-Signal declarations were found.

02

Why it matters

Content usage preference signals communicate intended downstream AI use separately from robots.txt crawl permission. They can express training and search preferences for compliant systems without replacing access-control rules.

Check name

Content Signal

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

Bot Access Control

Maturity

Informational

Goal

Declare AI content usage preferences when the site intentionally publishes machine-readable usage policy.

Result

Content Signal has a validation warning at "Validate declared usage preferences".

Validation steps

  1. Validate declared usage preferences

    No Content-Usage or Content-Signal declarations were found.

Evidence log1 step · 5 lines
Validate declared usage preferences [warning]! No Content-Usage or Content-Signal declarations were found.INFOValidate declared usage preferencesINFOParsing declared preferences into terms and values recordCount=0SKIPSkipping declaration validation because no Content-Usage or Content-Signal records were declared.SKIPCompare declared records to validation requirement actual=0 expected="No validation needed when no records are declared"WARNNo Content-Usage or Content-Signal declarations were present.

Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation

DNS-AID Agent Discovery

DNS-AID Agent Discovery has a validation warning at "Query DNS-AID records".

13 Warning

Needs attention

DNS-AID Agent Discovery

Warning
01

Issue

No DNS-AID HTTPS/SVCB records were found under _agents.

02

Why it matters

DNS-AID lets agents discover index, A2A, and other agent entrypoints before fetching HTTP metadata. HTTPS/SVCB records provide the service-binding substrate, while DNSSEC can authenticate the discovery answer when available.

Check name

DNS-AID Agent Discovery

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

Skill Discovery

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish DNS-AID HTTPS/SVCB records under _agents for DNS-based agent entrypoint discovery.

Result

DNS-AID Agent Discovery has a validation warning at "Query DNS-AID records".

Validation steps

  1. Query DNS-AID records

    No DNS-AID HTTPS/SVCB records were found under _agents.

  2. Check DNSSEC authentication evidence

    DNSSEC authentication evidence was not visible for the DNS-AID labels or hostname.

Evidence log2 steps · 24 lines
Query DNS-AID records [warning]! No DNS-AID HTTPS/SVCB records were found under _agents.INFOQuery DNS-AID recordsINFOBuild DNS-AID query names from hostname hostname="www.citusdata.com" labels=["_index._agents.www.citusdata.com","_a2a._agents.www.citusdata.com"] claimedOnPage=falseWARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_index._agents.www.citusdata.com" rrtype="HTTPS" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" rcode=3 ad=false answerCount=0WARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_index._agents.www.citusdata.com" rrtype="SVCB" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" rcode=3 ad=false answerCount=0WARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_index._agents.www.citusdata.com" rrtype="ANY" resolver="node-resolveAny-fallback" answerCount=0 error="queryAny ETIMEOUT _index._agents.www.citusdata.com"WARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_a2a._agents.www.citusdata.com" rrtype="HTTPS" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" rcode=3 ad=false answerCount=0WARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_a2a._agents.www.citusdata.com" rrtype="SVCB" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" rcode=3 ad=false answerCount=0WARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_a2a._agents.www.citusdata.com" rrtype="ANY" resolver="node-resolveAny-fallback" answerCount=0 error="queryAny ETIMEOUT _a2a._agents.www.citusdata.com"WARNCompare total DNS-AID answer count actual=0 expected="> 0"WARNNo DNS-AID HTTPS/SVCB records were found under _agents.Check DNSSEC authentication evidence [warning]! DNSSEC authentication evidence was not visible for the DNS-AID labels or hostname.INFOCheck DNSSEC authentication evidenceWARNCompare DNSSEC authenticated-data flag actual=false expected=trueWARNCompare visible DNSSEC material actual=false expected=trueWARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_index._agents.www.citusdata.com" rrtype="HTTPS" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_index._agents.www.citusdata.com" rrtype="SVCB" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_index._agents.www.citusdata.com" rrtype="ANY" resolver="node-resolveAny-fallback" dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_a2a._agents.www.citusdata.com" rrtype="HTTPS" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_a2a._agents.www.citusdata.com" rrtype="SVCB" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_a2a._agents.www.citusdata.com" rrtype="ANY" resolver="node-resolveAny-fallback" dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_index._agents.www.citusdata.com" rrtype="DNSKEY" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_a2a._agents.www.citusdata.com" rrtype="DNSKEY" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="www.citusdata.com" rrtype="DNSKEY" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="citusdata.com" rrtype="DNSKEY" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNDNSSEC authentication evidence was not visible for the DNS-AID labels or hostname.

AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEmerging recommendation

RSL license signal

No RSL declarations were found.

13 Warning

Needs attention

RSL license signal

Warning
01

Issue

No RSL declarations were found.

02

Why it matters

Really Simple Licensing is an emerging rights-expression layer for communicating content usage and licensing terms separately from robots.txt crawl permission.

Check name

RSL license signal

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

Bot Access Control

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Declare machine-readable content licensing terms for compliant AI and crawler systems when the site needs them.

Result

No RSL declarations were found.

Validation steps

  1. Discover RSL declarations

    No RSL declarations were found.

Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Discover RSL declarations [warning]! No RSL declarations were found.INFODiscover RSL declarationsINFOChecking robots.txt License records, HTTP Link rel=license headers, HTML license links, and inline RSL XML robotsFound=falseSKIPCount discovered RSL declarations actual=0 expected=">= 1 when RSL licensing terms are published" sources={}WARNNo RSL declarations were found on any supported discovery surface.

AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEmerging recommendation

TDMRep declaration

No TDMRep declaration was found.

13 Warning

Needs attention

TDMRep declaration

Warning
01

Issue

No TDMRep declaration was found at /.well-known/tdmrep.json.

02

Why it matters

TDMRep is a W3C Community Group protocol and IANA-registered well-known URI for declaring text and data mining reservation policy on applicable content.

Check name

TDMRep declaration

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

Bot Access Control

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish a machine-readable text and data mining reservation declaration and verifiable ODRL policy when the site needs one.

Result

No TDMRep declaration was found.

Validation steps

  1. Fetch /.well-known/tdmrep.json

    No TDMRep declaration was found at /.well-known/tdmrep.json.

Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Fetch /.well-known/tdmrep.json [warning]! No TDMRep declaration was found at /.well-known/tdmrep.json.INFOFetch /.well-known/tdmrep.jsonINFORequesting origin-level TDMRep declaration at /.well-known/tdmrep.jsonWARNCompare TDMRep file response actual=404 expected="2xx with JSON array when origin-level TDMRep is published" contentType="text/html" length=23917WARNNo TDMRep declaration was found at /.well-known/tdmrep.json. 

AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished

Semantic HTML

Semantic HTML is partially implemented.

10 Warning

Needs attention

Semantic HTML

Warning
01

Issue

Semantic HTML is incomplete: expected exactly one visible main landmark, found 2; skipped or empty headings; 6 links missing accessible names; 5 links are not crawlable; 1 image alt text quality issues; 5 ARIA/native semantic issues.

Details

02

Why it matters

Semantic HTML gives browsers, assistive technology, search systems, and agents reliable landmarks, headings, controls, form semantics, and image context.

Check name

Semantic HTML

Score

38/100

Status

warning

Category

Content Readiness

Maturity

Established

Goal

Expose readable page structure through semantic HTML and accessible controls.

Result

Semantic HTML is partially implemented.

Validation steps

  1. Page landmarks

    Expected exactly one visible main landmark; found 2.

  2. Heading structure

    Headings skip levels or include empty heading elements.

  3. Links

    6 links are missing accessible names.

  4. Image text alternatives

    1 image alt text issues were found.

  5. Native semantics and ARIA

    5 ARIA/native semantic conflicts or redundancies were found.

Evidence log5 steps · 15 lines
Page landmarks [fail]! Expected exactly one visible main landmark; found 2.INFOPage landmarksFAILCheck page landmarks evidence actual={"counts":{"main":1,"roleMain":1,"nav":1,"roleNavigation":1,"header":3,"roleBanner":1,"footer":1,"pageFooter":1,"roleContentinfo":0},"main":false} expected="semantic HTML evidence for this step"FAILPage landmarks failed issue="Expected exactly one visible main landmark; found 2."Heading structure [fail]! Headings skip levels or include empty heading elements.INFOHeading structureFAILCheck heading structure evidence actual={"counts":{"h1":1,"visibleH1":1,"headings":11,"emptyHeadings":0},"meaningfulH1":true} expected="semantic HTML evidence for this step"FAILHeading structure failed issue="Headings skip levels or include empty heading elements."Links [fail]! 6 links are missing accessible names.INFOLinksFAILCheck links evidence actual={"counts":{"links":56,"inaccessibleLinks":6,"nonCrawlableLinks":5,"genericLinks":1},"accessibleLinks":false} expected="semantic HTML evidence for this step"FAILLinks failed issue="6 links are missing accessible names."Image text alternatives [warning]! 1 image alt text issues were found.INFOImage text alternativesWARNCheck image text alternatives evidence actual={"counts":{"images":9,"imagesWithAlt":9,"imageAltIssues":1},"imageAltCoverage":true} expected="semantic HTML evidence for this step"WARNImage text alternatives has a warning issue="1 image alt text issues were found."Native semantics and ARIA [warning]! 5 ARIA/native semantic conflicts or redundancies were found.INFONative semantics and ARIAWARNCheck native semantics and aria evidence actual={"counts":{"ariaIssues":5},"nativeSemanticIntegrity":false} expected="native HTML semantics are present and not replaced by conflicting ARIA"WARNNative semantics and ARIA has a warning issue="5 ARIA/native semantic conflicts or redundancies were found."

AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished

Structured data

Structured data failed at "Parseability".

10 Fail

Needs attention

Structured data

Failed check
01

Issue

Detected structured data could not be parsed for: microdata.

02

Why it matters

Structured data gives agents explicit entities, relationships, and page meaning that are harder to infer reliably from visual layout alone.

Check name

Structured data

Score

42/100

Status

fail

Category

Content Readiness

Maturity

Established

Goal

Expose machine-readable page entities and relationships through a recognized structured-data syntax.

Result

Structured data failed at "Parseability".

Validation steps

  1. Parseability

    Detected structured data could not be parsed for: microdata.

  2. Schema.org entity typing

    Structured data was detected, but no typed Schema.org entities were extracted.

  3. Page-relevant schema family

    The page has specific visible content intent, but structured data does not include a matching primary schema family.

Evidence log3 steps · 12 lines
Parseability [fail]! Detected structured data could not be parsed for: microdata.INFOParseabilityINFOChecking detected structured data for parse errors formatsFound=["microdata"]FAILCheck invalid detected formats actual=1 expected=0 invalidPresentFormats=["microdata"] parseErrors=[{"format":"microdata","error":"itemprop attributes found without an enclosing itemscope entity."}]FAILDetected structured data has fatal parse issues invalidPresentFormats=["microdata"]Schema.org entity typing [fail]! Structured data was detected, but no typed Schema.org entities were extracted.INFOSchema.org entity typingINFOExtracting typed Schema.org entities from parsed structured dataFAILCheck extracted Schema.org type count actual=0 expected="> 0" schemaTypes=[] entityCount=0FAILNo typed Schema.org entities were extractedPage-relevant schema family [fail]! The page has specific visible content intent, but structured data does not include a matching primary schema family.INFOPage-relevant schema familyINFOInferring specific page intent and comparing it with detected Schema.org typesFAILCheck schema types matching specific visible page intent actual=0 expected="> 0" inferredIntents=["software","event"] expectedTypes=["SoftwareApplication","WebApplication","MobileApplication","Event","BroadcastEvent"] matchingTypes=[] observedTypes=[]FAILNo primary schema family matches the inferred page intent expectedTypes=["SoftwareApplication","WebApplication","MobileApplication","Event","BroadcastEvent"] primaryTypes=[]

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

GEO: Citable passages

GEO: Citable passages scored 0/100 and needs a fix.

9 Fail

Needs attention

GEO: Citable passages

Failed check
01

Issue

No evidence-backed, citation-length explanatory paragraph was found.

Details

02

Why it matters

Generative answer systems work best with visible, self-contained, evidence-backed content, clear entities, trustworthy attribution, structured page sections, and crawler-accessible HTML. These signals improve machine understanding even though they do not guarantee AI citations.

Check name

GEO: Citable passages

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for AI answer engines to extract, cite, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

GEO: Citable passages scored 0/100 and needs a fix.

AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished

Author attribution

Author attribution is partially implemented.

8 Warning

Needs attention

Author attribution

Warning
01

Issue

No named author or publisher identity could be extracted.

02

Why it matters

Author attribution helps agents cite content responsibly, assess source credibility, and distinguish editorial pages from anonymous marketing copy.

Check name

Author attribution

Score

55/100

Status

warning

Category

Content Readiness

Maturity

Established

Goal

Identify content authors or publishers for trust and attribution.

Result

Author attribution is partially implemented.

Validation steps

  1. Schema.org attribution

    Schema.org attribution is incomplete or relies only on publisher/fallback evidence.

  2. Author identity quality

    No named author or publisher identity could be extracted.

Evidence log2 steps · 8 lines
Schema.org attribution [warning]! Schema.org attribution is incomplete or relies only on publisher/fallback evidence.INFOSchema.org attributionINFOChecking structured data for author, creator, and publisher contributorsWARNCheck named Schema.org author count actual=0 expected="> 0" authorCount=0 publisherCount=0 namedContributors=0 authors=[] publishers=[] formats=[]WARNSchema.org attribution is incomplete or fallback-only authorCount=0 publisherCount=0 authors=[] publishers=[]Author identity quality [fail]! No named author or publisher identity could be extracted.INFOAuthor identity qualityINFOChecking contributors for stable identity signalsFAILCheck identified contributor count actual=0 expected="> 0" namedContributors=0 identifiedContributors=[] unidentifiedContributors=[]FAILNo named contributor identity could be extracted

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Evidence and trust

AEO: Evidence and trust scored 43/100 and needs a fix.

7 Fail

Needs attention

AEO: Evidence and trust

Failed check
01

Issue

Missing answer evidence or trust signals: author, publisher, freshnessDate, sameAs.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Evidence and trust

Score

43/100

Status

fail

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Evidence and trust scored 43/100 and needs a fix.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AIO: Source and trust signals

AIO: Source and trust signals scored 50/100 and needs improvement.

5 Warning

Needs attention

AIO: Source and trust signals

Warning
01

Issue

Missing AIO trust signals: author, publisher, freshnessDate.

Details

02

Why it matters

Google AI Overviews and AI Mode depend on normal Google Search eligibility, snippet permissions, useful visible content, consistent structured data, trust signals, and page experience basics. These signals help Google understand and preview a page, but they do not guarantee selection.

Check name

AIO: Source and trust signals

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content eligible, understandable, and previewable for Google Search AI features without promising inclusion.

Result

AIO: Source and trust signals scored 50/100 and needs improvement.

Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished

Frame protection

Frame protection has a validation warning at "Validate CSP frame-ancestors".

5 Warning

Needs attention

Frame protection

Warning
01

Issue

Frame protection relies only on X-Frame-Options; CSP frame-ancestors is the modern control.

02

Why it matters

Frame protection blocks hostile sites from embedding pages in deceptive frames, reducing clickjacking and UI redressing risk.

Check name

Frame protection

Score

81/100

Status

warning

Category

Security & Trust

Maturity

Established

Goal

Prevent unwanted framing with an enforcing CSP frame-ancestors directive or a valid X-Frame-Options fallback.

Result

Frame protection has a validation warning at "Validate CSP frame-ancestors".

Validation steps

  1. Validate CSP frame-ancestors

    Frame protection relies only on X-Frame-Options; CSP frame-ancestors is the modern control.

Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Validate CSP frame-ancestors [warning]! Frame protection relies only on X-Frame-Options; CSP frame-ancestors is the modern control.INFOValidate CSP frame-ancestorsINFORead CSP frame-ancestors signals enforcingHeaderPresent=false reportOnlyHeaderPresent=false metaFrameAncestors=false policyCount=0 duplicateDirectives=[]WARNCompare effective frame-ancestors directive actual="missing" expected="valid restrictive enforcing frame-ancestors" issue="Frame protection relies only on X-Frame-Options; CSP frame-ancestors is the modern control."WARNFrame protection relies only on X-Frame-Options; CSP frame-ancestors is the modern control.

Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished

Referrer-Policy

Referrer-Policy has a validation warning at "Review policy strength".

5 Warning

Needs attention

Referrer-Policy

Warning
01

Issue

no-referrer-when-downgrade is weaker than the modern baseline and can send full URLs cross-origin.

02

Why it matters

Referrer-Policy controls how much URL context is sent to other origins, limiting accidental leakage of paths, queries, and identifiers.

Check name

Referrer-Policy

Score

82/100

Status

warning

Category

Security & Trust

Maturity

Established

Goal

Limit how much referrer data leaves the site with an explicit Referrer-Policy header.

Result

Referrer-Policy has a validation warning at "Review policy strength".

Validation steps

  1. Review policy strength

    no-referrer-when-downgrade is weaker than the modern baseline and can send full URLs cross-origin.

  2. Review observed browser responses

    One or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome emitted a weaker Referrer-Policy.

Evidence log2 steps · 8 lines
Review policy strength [warning]! no-referrer-when-downgrade is weaker than the modern baseline and can send full URLs cross-origin.INFOReview policy strengthINFOClassify effective referrer policy effectivePolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade" classification="weak" strongPolicies=["no-referrer","same-origin","strict-origin","strict-origin-when-cross-origin"] weakPolicies=["no-referrer-when-downgrade","origin","origin-when-cross-origin"] unsafePolicy="unsafe-url"WARNCompare policy privacy strength actual="weak" expected="strong or modern-baseline" issue="no-referrer-when-downgrade is weaker than the modern baseline and can send full URLs cross-origin."WARNno-referrer-when-downgrade is weaker than the modern baseline and can send full URLs cross-origin.Review observed browser responses [warning]! One or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome emitted a weaker Referrer-Policy.INFOReview observed browser responsesINFOSample Chrome-observed same-origin responses observedResponseCount=38 sameOriginCount=27 htmlDocumentCount=1WARNCompare observed Referrer-Policy coverage actual={"missingPolicyCount":0,"unsafeOrInvalidPolicyCount":0,"weakPolicyCount":1,"affected":[{"url":"https://www.citusdata.com/","status":200,"resourceType":"document","contentType":"text/html","referrerPolicy":"no-referrer-when-downgrade","effectivePolicy":"no-referrer-when-downgrade","classification":"weak"}]} expected="0 missing, unsafe, invalid, or weak same-origin HTML responses" issue="One or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome emitted a weaker Referrer-Policy."WARNOne or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome emitted a weaker Referrer-Policy.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

GEO: Source and trust signals

GEO: Source and trust signals scored 50/100 and needs improvement.

4 Warning

Needs attention

GEO: Source and trust signals

Warning
01

Issue

Missing source or trust signals: authorOrOwner, freshnessDate, entityLinks.

Details

02

Why it matters

Generative answer systems work best with visible, self-contained, evidence-backed content, clear entities, trustworthy attribution, structured page sections, and crawler-accessible HTML. These signals improve machine understanding even though they do not guarantee AI citations.

Check name

GEO: Source and trust signals

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for AI answer engines to extract, cite, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

GEO: Source and trust signals scored 50/100 and needs improvement.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Question and answer structure

AEO: Question and answer structure scored 68/100 and needs improvement.

4 Warning

Needs attention

AEO: Question and answer structure

Warning
01

Issue

Heading structure issues were detected.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Question and answer structure

Score

68/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Question and answer structure scored 68/100 and needs improvement.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

GEO: Structured extraction

GEO: Structured extraction scored 63/100 and needs improvement.

3 Warning

Needs attention

GEO: Structured extraction

Warning
01

Issue

Missing or weak extraction signals: clean heading hierarchy, summary or key takeaways, typed JSON-LD structured data.

Details

02

Why it matters

Generative answer systems work best with visible, self-contained, evidence-backed content, clear entities, trustworthy attribution, structured page sections, and crawler-accessible HTML. These signals improve machine understanding even though they do not guarantee AI citations.

Check name

GEO: Structured extraction

Score

63/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for AI answer engines to extract, cite, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

GEO: Structured extraction scored 63/100 and needs improvement.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Answer-first passages

AEO: Answer-first passages scored 73/100 and needs improvement.

3 Warning

Needs attention

AEO: Answer-first passages

Warning
01

Issue

1 section(s) bury or omit a concise opening answer.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Answer-first passages

Score

73/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Answer-first passages scored 73/100 and needs improvement.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

GEO: AI retrieval access

GEO: AI retrieval access scored 75/100 and needs improvement.

2 Warning

Needs attention

GEO: AI retrieval access

Warning
01

Issue

robots.txt was not fetched successfully, so crawler access could not be confirmed.

Details

02

Why it matters

Generative answer systems work best with visible, self-contained, evidence-backed content, clear entities, trustworthy attribution, structured page sections, and crawler-accessible HTML. These signals improve machine understanding even though they do not guarantee AI citations.

Check name

GEO: AI retrieval access

Score

75/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for AI answer engines to extract, cite, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

GEO: AI retrieval access scored 75/100 and needs improvement.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AIO: Google Search eligibility

AIO: Google Search eligibility scored 85/100 and needs improvement.

2 Warning

Needs attention

AIO: Google Search eligibility

Warning
01

Issue

Canonical tag is missing.

Details

02

Why it matters

Google AI Overviews and AI Mode depend on normal Google Search eligibility, snippet permissions, useful visible content, consistent structured data, trust signals, and page experience basics. These signals help Google understand and preview a page, but they do not guarantee selection.

Check name

AIO: Google Search eligibility

Score

85/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content eligible, understandable, and previewable for Google Search AI features without promising inclusion.

Result

AIO: Google Search eligibility scored 85/100 and needs improvement.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AIO: Page experience proxy

AIO: Page experience proxy scored 85/100 and needs improvement.

2 Warning

Needs attention

AIO: Page experience proxy

Warning
01

Issue

3 image(s) are missing width/height attributes.

Details

02

Why it matters

Google AI Overviews and AI Mode depend on normal Google Search eligibility, snippet permissions, useful visible content, consistent structured data, trust signals, and page experience basics. These signals help Google understand and preview a page, but they do not guarantee selection.

Check name

AIO: Page experience proxy

Score

85/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content eligible, understandable, and previewable for Google Search AI features without promising inclusion.

Result

AIO: Page experience proxy scored 85/100 and needs improvement.

Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished

HSTS header

HSTS header has a validation warning at "Review preload opt-in".

1 Warning

Needs attention

HSTS header

Warning
01

Issue

preload is present; verify hstspreload.org operational requirements before submission.

02

Why it matters

HSTS tells browsers to keep using HTTPS after the first secure visit, reducing downgrade, SSL-stripping, and mixed-transport risk for repeat users.

Check name

HSTS header

Score

95/100

Status

warning

Category

Security & Trust

Maturity

Established

Goal

Require HTTPS for repeat browser visits with a valid Strict-Transport-Security policy.

Result

HSTS header has a validation warning at "Review preload opt-in".

Validation steps

  1. Review preload opt-in

    preload is present; verify hstspreload.org operational requirements before submission.

Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Review preload opt-in [warning]! preload is present; verify hstspreload.org operational requirements before submission.INFOReview preload opt-inINFOInspect preload opt-in preload=true includeSubDomains=true maxAge=31536000WARNCompare header-level preload requirements actual="eligible by header" expected="preload + includeSubDomains + max-age >= 31536000" issue="preload is present; verify hstspreload.org operational requirements before submission."WARNpreload is present; verify hstspreload.org operational requirements before submission.

AI DiscoverabilityDiscoverabilityEstablished

IndexNow key

IndexNow key is informational for this page.

Informational

Needs attention

IndexNow key

Informational
01

Issue

IndexNow key is informational for this page.

02

Why it matters

IndexNow lets sites notify participating search engines about changed URLs, but ownership verification requires a UTF-8 key file whose filename matches the key.

Check name

IndexNow key

Score

100/100

Status

informational

Category

Discoverability

Maturity

Established

Goal

Verify that IndexNow ownership key placement is detectable when the site advertises it.

Result

IndexNow key is informational for this page.

Validation steps

  1. Find advertised IndexNow key location

    No IndexNow key location was advertised in HTML, Link headers, or robots.txt.

  2. Fetch and validate IndexNow key file

    No discoverable IndexNow key file was found.

Evidence log2 steps · 10 lines
Find advertised IndexNow key location [informational]! No IndexNow key location was advertised in HTML, Link headers, or robots.txt.INFOFind advertised IndexNow key locationINFOLook for IndexNow key hints in HTML, Link headers, and robots.txt supportedHints=["robots.txt IndexNow-Key","rel=indexnow-key","meta name=indexnow-key-location"]PASSCompare advertised key location count actual=0 expected="> 0"WARNNo IndexNow key location was advertised in HTML, Link headers, or robots.txt.Fetch and validate IndexNow key file [informational]! No discoverable IndexNow key file was found.INFOFetch and validate IndexNow key fileINFOLook for IndexNow key hints in HTML, Link headers, and robots.txt supportedHints=["robots.txt IndexNow-Key","rel=indexnow-key","meta name=indexnow-key-location"]PASSCompare advertised key location count actual=0 expected="> 0"INFOFetch each advertised same-origin key file and validate filename/body matchFAILCompare valid IndexNow key file count actual=0 expected="> 0"WARNNo discoverable IndexNow key file was found.

Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit

Network dependency tree

50 Fail

Check name

Network dependency tree

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Device

desktop

Category

Performance

Fix guidance

[Avoid chaining critical requests](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/network-dependency-tree) by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load.

Evidence
{
  "description": "[Avoid chaining critical requests](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/network-dependency-tree) by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load."
}

Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit

Reduce unused JavaScript

25 Warning

Check name

Reduce unused JavaScript

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Device

desktop

Category

Performance

Estimated savings

Est savings of 353 KiB

Fix guidance

Reduce unused JavaScript and defer loading scripts until they are required to decrease bytes consumed by network activity. [Learn how to reduce unused JavaScript](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/unused-javascript/).

Evidence
{
  "description": "Reduce unused JavaScript and defer loading scripts until they are required to decrease bytes consumed by network activity. [Learn how to reduce unused JavaScript](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/unused-javascript/).",
  "displayValue": "Est savings of 353 KiB",
  "numericValue": 0
}

Fix with MCP or CLI

Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.

Score history

Public scan score over time

Public reports for this website origin. Select any point or report link to open that canonical report.

1 reports
Public score history report links
Scan dateScoreReadinessReport
59/100Level 3, Bot-AwareCurrent report