Rescan Report
Share Report
Copy Report Link
Rescan Report
Share Report
Copy Report Link
Export Report
60/100

OVERALL SCORE

Level 3, Bot-Aware

Moderate readiness for AI agents
AIDiscoverability53%Agent Easeof Use50%Security& Trust83%GEO, AIO, AEO64%SEO92%Performance54%Accessibility100%
  • AI Discoverability 53 out of 100
  • Agent Ease of Use 50 out of 100
  • Security & Trust 83 out of 100
  • GEO, AIO and AEO 64 out of 100
  • SEO 92 out of 100
  • Performance 54 out of 100
  • Accessibility 100 out of 100

CAPTURED SCREENSHOT

Captured website desktop screenshot

What AI sees of your website

follow.it | The Ultimate News Platform favicon

follow.it | The Ultimate News Platform

Never miss important news again, without information overload. As publisher, turn your news into revenue and increase traffic.

Next step

Turn this report into a fix workflow

2 failed checks are ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.

Detailed report scores grouped by capability area
MetricScoreStatusPassedFailedWarningEvidence
AI Discoverability
53
Needs work2434View details
Discoverability
47
Priority fix600
Content Readiness
63
Needs work1611View details
Bot Access Control
49
Priority fix223View details
GEO, AIO and AEO
64
Needs work1000
GEO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable300
AIO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable400
AEO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable300
SEO
92
Strong900
SEO
92
Strong900
Security & Trust
83
Mostly ready2000
Security & Trust
83
Mostly ready2000
Performance
54
Needs work1400
Performance
54
Needs work1400

Prioritized recommendations

Issues ranked by score impact

3 items need attention

AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished

Author attribution

Author attribution is partially implemented.

45 Warning

Needs attention

Author attribution

Warning
01

Issue

No named author or publisher identity could be extracted.

02

Why it matters

Author attribution helps agents cite content responsibly, assess source credibility, and distinguish editorial pages from anonymous marketing copy.

Check name

Author attribution

Score

55/100

Status

warning

Category

Content Readiness

Maturity

Established

Goal

Identify content authors or publishers for trust and attribution.

Result

Author attribution is partially implemented.

Validation steps

  1. Schema.org attribution

    Schema.org attribution is incomplete or relies only on publisher/fallback evidence.

  2. Author identity quality

    No named author or publisher identity could be extracted.

Evidence log2 steps · 8 lines
Schema.org attribution [warning]! Schema.org attribution is incomplete or relies only on publisher/fallback evidence.INFOSchema.org attributionINFOChecking structured data for author, creator, and publisher contributorsWARNCheck named Schema.org author count actual=0 expected="> 0" authorCount=0 publisherCount=1 namedContributors=0 authors=[] publishers=[{"role":"publisher","id":"https://follow.it/#identity","sameAs":[],"format":"json-ld","mergedName":false}] formats=["json-ld"]WARNSchema.org attribution is incomplete or fallback-only authorCount=0 publisherCount=1 authors=[] publishers=[{"role":"publisher","id":"https://follow.it/#identity","sameAs":[],"format":"json-ld","mergedName":false}]Author identity quality [fail]! No named author or publisher identity could be extracted.INFOAuthor identity qualityINFOChecking contributors for stable identity signalsFAILCheck identified contributor count actual=0 expected="> 0" namedContributors=0 identifiedContributors=[] unidentifiedContributors=[{"role":"publisher","id":"https://follow.it/#identity","sameAs":[],"format":"json-ld","mergedName":false}]FAILNo named contributor identity could be extracted

AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEstablished

AI bot rules in robots.txt

AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".

35 Fail

Needs attention

AI bot rules in robots.txt

Failed check
01

Issue

No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.

02

Why it matters

AI crawler product tokens have different meanings. Explicit robots.txt groups make training, search, and retrieval access policy auditable for compliant crawler operators.

Check name

AI bot rules in robots.txt

Score

31/100

Status

fail

Category

Bot Access Control

Maturity

Established

Goal

Declare deliberate robots.txt rules for major AI training, AI search, user-triggered, and dataset crawlers.

Result

AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".

Validation steps

  1. Classify AI crawler rules

    No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.

Evidence log1 step · 6 lines
Classify AI crawler rules [fail]! No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.INFOClassify AI crawler rulesINFOParsing User-agent groups and Allow/Disallow records for known AI crawler tokens evaluatedPath="/"INFOEvaluating exact User-agent matches before wildcard fallback exactAiPolicyCount=0 totalCrawlerTokens=18FAILNo explicit AI crawler User-agent groups were found examplesExpected=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ClaudeBot","Google-Extended","CCBot"]FAILCompare explicit AI crawler coverage actual=0 expected="> 0 explicit non-search AI crawler policies" missingTokens=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ChatGPT-User","ClaudeBot","Claude-SearchBot","Claude-User","Google-Extended","Applebot-Extended","Amazonbot","Amzn-SearchBot","Amzn-User","PerplexityBot"]INFOResolved effective root-path policy for crawler tokens blocked=0 allowed=21 unspecified=0

AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEmerging recommendation

ai.txt policy

ai.txt policy failed at "Fetch /ai.txt".

30 Fail

Needs attention

ai.txt policy

Failed check
01

Issue

/ai.txt returned HTTP 400.

02

Why it matters

ai.txt is a fragmented emerging convention. It can communicate human-readable AI crawling, training, attribution, restriction, and contact guidance, but it is not a standard access-control mechanism and absence should not be penalized.

Check name

ai.txt policy

Score

40/100

Status

fail

Category

Bot Access Control

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish an advisory human-readable AI usage policy only when the site intentionally needs one.

Result

ai.txt policy failed at "Fetch /ai.txt".

Validation steps

  1. Fetch /ai.txt

    /ai.txt returned HTTP 400.

  2. Validate transport

    ai.txt was served as application/json; text/plain is preferred.

  3. Parse ai.txt policy

    ai.txt is present but does not follow the AI Visibility section model.

  4. Validate policy content

    ai.txt does not follow the AI Visibility section model; treating it as non-standard advisory text.

Evidence log4 steps · 18 lines
Fetch /ai.txt [fail]! /ai.txt returned HTTP 400.INFOFetch /ai.txtINFORequesting optional advisory policy file at /ai.txtFAILCompare /ai.txt HTTP response actual=400 expected="2xx when ai.txt is intentionally published; 404/410 means absent optional file" contentType="application/json" length=146FAIL/ai.txt returned HTTP 400. statusCode=400Validate transport [warning]! ai.txt was served as application/json; text/plain is preferred.INFOValidate transportINFOChecking ai.txt media type, size, line count, and whether the response looks like plain text contentType="application/json" length=146 lineCount=7WARNCompare media type to preferred text/plain transport actual="application/json" expected="text/plain preferred; readable text required"WARNai.txt was served as application/json; text/plain is preferred. warnings=["ai.txt was served as application/json; text/plain is preferred."]Parse ai.txt policy [warning]! ai.txt is present but does not follow the AI Visibility section model.INFOParse ai.txt policyINFODetecting ai.txt convention from bracket sections, frontmatter, headings, and ai.txt context linksINFODetected policy structure convention="unknown-text" sections=[] markdownHeadings=[]WARNCheck AI Visibility required sections actual="missing identity, permissions, restrictions" expected="identity, permissions, and restrictions" missingRecommended=["attribution","contact","content-types"]WARNai.txt is present but does not follow the AI Visibility section model.Validate policy content [warning]! ai.txt does not follow the AI Visibility section model; treating it as non-standard advisory text.INFOValidate policy contentINFOChecking required section content, permission/restriction language, attribution, contact details, and safety risks convention="unknown-text"INFODetected policy signals hasPermissionLanguage=false hasRestrictionLanguage=false hasTrainingLanguage=false hasAttributionLanguage=false hasContact=falseWARNCheck required and recommended section coverage actual={"missingRequired":["identity","permissions","restrictions"],"missingRecommended":["attribution","contact","content-types"]} expected={"missingRequired":[],"recommendedPresentWhenPossible":true}WARNai.txt does not follow the AI Visibility section model; treating it as non-standard advisory text.

Sign in to see 39 other issues and the full report

Create a free account to unlock every issue, evidence details, exports, and higher free limits.

Development Note:

Please configure GOOGLE_CLIENT_ID in .env to activate live login.

Fix with MCP or CLI

Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.

Score history

Public scan score over time

Public reports for this website origin. Select any point or report link to open that canonical report.

1 reports
Public score history report links
Scan dateScoreReadinessReport
60/100Level 3, Bot-AwareCurrent report