CanAgentUse tools

UCP Suite

Validate Universal Commerce Protocol discovery, then test product search, carts, checkout links, and merchant handoff flows.

MCP Playground

Connect to remote MCP servers, inspect tools and resources, test prompts, auth, headers, notifications, and JSON-RPC responses.

A2A Playground

Inspect Agent Cards, validate advertised endpoints, and prepare safe requests for agent-to-agent workflows.

Agent Website Viewer

Enter a public URL and see the roles, names, landmarks, controls, and blockers that shape how AI agents understand the page.

SCANNED
Jul 4, 2026, 2:11 PM
VISIBILITY
Public
Rescan Report
Share Report
Copy Report Link
Export Report
45/100

OVERALL SCORE

Level 2, Agent-Limited

Priority improvements needed for AI agents
AIDiscoverability38%Agent Easeof Use47%Security& Trust70%GEO, AIO, AEO53%SEO100%Performance100%Accessibility0%
  • AI Discoverability 38 out of 100
  • Agent Ease of Use 47 out of 100
  • Security & Trust 70 out of 100
  • GEO, AIO and AEO 53 out of 100
  • SEO 100 out of 100
  • Performance 100 out of 100
  • Accessibility 0 out of 100

CAPTURED SCREENSHOT

Captured website desktop screenshot

What AI sees of your website

Earn your first dollar online with Gumroad favicon

Earn your first dollar online with Gumroad

Start selling what you know, see what sticks, and get paid. Simple and effective.

Open Agent View

Next step

Turn this report into a fix workflow

1 failed check is ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.

Fix with MCP / CLI
Detailed report scores grouped by capability area
MetricScoreStatusPassedFailedWarningEvidence
AI Discoverability
38
Priority fix1100
Discoverability
48
Priority fix500
Content Readiness
18
Priority fix500
Bot Access Control
45
Priority fix100
Agent Ease of Use
47
Priority fix642View details
MCP
40
Priority fix300
Skill Discovery
47
Priority fix232View details
Google Agentic Browsing
50
Needs work110View details
GEO, AIO and AEO
53
Needs work800
GEO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable300
AIO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable200
AEO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable300
SEO
100
Strong1000
SEO
100
Strong1000
Security & Trust
70
Needs work1700
Security & Trust
70
Needs work1700
Performance
100
Strong1900
Performance
100
Strong1900
Accessibility
0
Priority fix010View details
Accessibility
0
Priority fix010View details

Prioritized recommendations

Issues ranked by score impact

3 items need attention

Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation

agents.json

agents.json failed at "Validate Wildcard schema shape".

75 Fail

Needs attention

agents.json

Failed check
01

Issue

agents.json does not match the expected Wildcard OpenAPI workflow shape.

Details

02

Why it matters

Wildcard agents.json gives agents workflow-level context beyond plain OpenAPI, including flows, links, examples, and API action structure. It is an emerging OpenAPI-adjacent proposal, so scanners should validate the contract shape without treating it as an A2A or IETF standard.

Check name

agents.json

Score

25/100

Status

fail

Category

Skill Discovery

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish a Wildcard-style agents.json file so agents can discover OpenAPI-backed workflows, links, examples, and authentication requirements.

Result

agents.json failed at "Validate Wildcard schema shape".

Validation steps

  1. Discover agents.json

    agents.json was found only at the fallback /agents.json path.

    agents.json is missing or only available at a fallback path
  2. Validate Wildcard schema shape

    agents.json does not match the expected Wildcard OpenAPI workflow shape.

    agents.json schema shape is invalid or incomplete
  3. Validate API actions

    Wildcard agents.json must include valid OpenAPI-derived action or operation definitions.

    agents.json action definitions are invalid or missing
  4. Validate flows and links

    No executable flows were found.

    agents.json flows or links are invalid
  5. Review examples and LLM usability

    Examples or descriptions are too thin for reliable agent argument generation.

    agents.json examples or descriptions need improvement
Evidence log5 steps · 23 lines
Discover agents.json [warning]! agents.json was found only at the fallback /agents.json path.INFODiscover agents.jsonINFOTry agents.json discovery paths in priority order paths=["/.well-known/agents.json","/agents.json"]WARNagents.json candidate path did not return a usable contract path="/.well-known/agents.json" statusCode=404 contentType="application/json; charset=utf-8"PASSFound an agents.json candidate path="/agents.json" statusCode=200 contentType="application/json; charset=utf-8" bytes=1133WARNSelected fallback agents.json location path="/agents.json" requestedUrl="https://gumroad.com/agents.json"WARNagents.json was found only at the fallback /agents.json path.Validate Wildcard schema shape [fail]! agents.json does not match the expected Wildcard OpenAPI workflow shape.INFOValidate Wildcard schema shapeINFOParse agents.json and classify contract shape shape="unknown"FAILCompare contract shape actual="unknown" expected="wildcard"FAILCompare missing required schema fields actual="none" expected="none"FAILCompare Content-Type with JSON expectation actual=true expected=trueFAILagents.json does not match the expected Wildcard OpenAPI workflow shape.Validate API actions [fail]! Wildcard agents.json must include valid OpenAPI-derived action or operation definitions.INFOValidate API actionsFAILCompare API action count actual=0 expected="> 0"FAILCompare invalid action definitions actual=0 expected=0FAILWildcard agents.json must include valid OpenAPI-derived action or operation definitions.Validate flows and links [fail]! No executable flows were found.INFOValidate flows and linksFAILCompare workflow flow count actual=0 expected="> 0"FAILCompare operation link issues actual=0 expected=0FAILNo executable flows were found.Review examples and LLM usability [warning]! Examples or descriptions are too thin for reliable agent argument generation.INFOReview examples and LLM usabilityWARNCompare usable example count actual=0 expected="> 0 when actions are present"WARNExamples or descriptions are too thin for reliable agent argument generation.

AccessibilityAccessibilityBrowser audit

Accessibility audit

100 Fail

Check name

Accessibility audit

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Device

desktop

Category

Accessibility

Fix guidance

Make sure the page can load in Chrome and run Accessibility checks.

Evidence
{
  "error": "Accessibility audit did not return a result."
}

Agent Ease of UseGoogle Agentic BrowsingBrowser audit

Accessibility tree is not well-formed

100 Fail

Check name

Accessibility tree is not well-formed

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Device

desktop

Category

Google Agentic Browsing

Fix guidance

A well-formed [accessibility tree](http://goo.gle/lighthouse-agentic-a11y) helps AI agents to navigate and interact with the page.

Evidence
{
  "description": "A well-formed [accessibility tree](http://goo.gle/lighthouse-agentic-a11y) helps AI agents to navigate and interact with the page."
}

Sign in to see 34 other issues and the full report

Create a free account to unlock every issue, evidence details, exports, and higher free limits.

Email code

Fix with MCP or CLI

Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.

Fix with MCP / CLI

Score history

Public scan score over time

Public reports for this website origin. Select any point or report link to open that canonical report.

2 reports
Public score history report links
Scan dateScoreReadinessReport
58/100Level 3, Bot-AwareView report
45/100Level 2, Agent-LimitedCurrent report