CanAgentUse

CanAgentUse products

MCP ServerInstall CanAgentUse in your coding agent so scan findings become repo-ready fixes.View product WooCommerce PluginPublish UCP discovery and agent-ready commerce signals from WooCommerce without rebuilding checkout.View product Shopify PluginAdd UCP discovery, storefront metadata checks, and controlled cart-to-checkout flows for shopping agents.View product AgentReady CIScan commits and PRs, publish reports, and choose which agent-readiness failures should block merges.View product

CanAgentUse tools

UCP Suite

Validate Universal Commerce Protocol discovery, then test product search, carts, checkout links, and merchant handoff flows.

UCP ValidatorUCP Playground

MCP Playground

Connect to remote MCP servers, inspect tools and resources, test prompts, auth, headers, notifications, and JSON-RPC responses.

MCP Playground

A2A Playground

Inspect Agent Cards, validate advertised endpoints, and prepare safe requests for agent-to-agent workflows.

A2A Playground

Agent Website Viewer

Enter a public URL and see the roles, names, landmarks, controls, and blockers that shape how AI agents understand the page.

Agent Website Viewer
New Scan
https://www.jhuapl.edu/
SCANNED
Jul 4, 2026, 4:17 PM
VISIBILITY
Public
SUITE2026.06.10
Rescan Report
Share Report
Copy Report Link
Export Report
48/100

OVERALL SCORE

Level 2, Agent-Limited

Priority improvements needed for AI agents
AIDiscoverability37%Agent Easeof Use60%Security& Trust61%GEO, AIO, AEO58%SEO92%Performance35%Accessibility44%
  • AI Discoverability 37 out of 100
  • Agent Ease of Use 60 out of 100
  • Security & Trust 61 out of 100
  • GEO, AIO and AEO 58 out of 100
  • SEO 92 out of 100
  • Performance 35 out of 100
  • Accessibility 44 out of 100

CAPTURED SCREENSHOT

Captured website desktop screenshot

What AI sees of your website

Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory favicon

Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory

Johns Hopkins APL provides solutions to complex national security and scientific challenges with technical expertise and prototyping, research and development, and analysis.

Open Agent View

Next step

Turn this report into a fix workflow

2 failed checks are ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.

Fix with MCP / CLI
Detailed report scores grouped by capability area
MetricScoreStatusPassedFailedWarningEvidence
AI Discoverability
37
Priority fix1210View details
Discoverability
47
Priority fix600
Content Readiness
16
Priority fix500
Bot Access Control
45
Priority fix110View details
Agent Ease of Use
60
Needs work300
Skill Discovery
54
Needs work100
Google Agentic Browsing
100
Strong200
GEO, AIO and AEO
58
Needs work800
GEO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable300
AIO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable300
AEO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable200
SEO
92
Strong900
SEO
92
Strong900
Security & Trust
61
Needs work1210View details
Security & Trust
61
Needs work1210View details
Performance
35
Priority fix1210View details
Performance
35
Priority fix1210View details

Prioritized recommendations

Issues ranked by score impact

3 items need attention

AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEstablished

AI bot rules in robots.txt

AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".

69 Fail

Needs attention

AI bot rules in robots.txt

Failed check
01

Issue

No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.

Details

02

Why it matters

AI crawler product tokens have different meanings. Explicit robots.txt groups make training, search, and retrieval access policy auditable for compliant crawler operators.

Check name

AI bot rules in robots.txt

Score

31/100

Status

fail

Category

Bot Access Control

Maturity

Established

Goal

Declare deliberate robots.txt rules for major AI training, AI search, user-triggered, and dataset crawlers.

Result

AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".

Validation steps

  1. Classify AI crawler rules

    No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.

    robots.txt lacks explicit AI crawler rules
Evidence log1 step · 6 lines
Classify AI crawler rules [fail]! No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.INFOClassify AI crawler rulesINFOParsing User-agent groups and Allow/Disallow records for known AI crawler tokens evaluatedPath="/"INFOEvaluating exact User-agent matches before wildcard fallback exactAiPolicyCount=0 totalCrawlerTokens=18FAILNo explicit AI crawler User-agent groups were found examplesExpected=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ClaudeBot","Google-Extended","CCBot"]FAILCompare explicit AI crawler coverage actual=0 expected="> 0 explicit non-search AI crawler policies" missingTokens=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ChatGPT-User","ClaudeBot","Claude-SearchBot","Claude-User","Google-Extended","Applebot-Extended","Amazonbot","Amzn-SearchBot","Amzn-User","PerplexityBot"]INFOResolved effective root-path policy for crawler tokens blocked=0 allowed=21 unspecified=0

Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished

Content-Security-Policy

Content-Security-Policy failed at "Find enforcing CSP delivery".

60 Fail

Needs attention

Content-Security-Policy

Failed check
01

Issue

Applicable HTML response is missing an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.

Details

02

Why it matters

Content Security Policy reduces the impact of injection bugs by limiting where scripts, styles, frames, forms, and other browser resources can load or execute.

Check name

Content-Security-Policy

Score

40/100

Status

fail

Category

Security & Trust

Maturity

Established

Goal

Constrain browser resource loading and script execution with an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.

Result

Content-Security-Policy failed at "Find enforcing CSP delivery".

Validation steps

  1. Find enforcing CSP delivery

    Applicable HTML response is missing an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.

    Enforcing Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Find enforcing CSP delivery [fail]! Applicable HTML response is missing an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.INFOFind enforcing CSP deliveryINFORead CSP delivery headers enforcingHeader="missing" reportOnlyHeader="missing" metaPolicyCount=0 legacyHeadersPresent=[]FAILRequire enforcing Content-Security-Policy header actual="missing" expected="present" issue="Applicable HTML response is missing an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header."FAILApplicable HTML response is missing an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.

PerformancePerformanceBrowser audit

Forced reflow

100 Fail

Check name

Forced reflow

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Device

desktop

Category

Performance

Fix guidance

A forced reflow occurs when JavaScript queries geometric properties (such as offsetWidth) after styles have been invalidated by a change to the DOM state. This can result in poor performance. Learn more about [forced reflows](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/forced-reflow) and possible mitigations.

Evidence
{
  "description": "A forced reflow occurs when JavaScript queries geometric properties (such as offsetWidth) after styles have been invalidated by a change to the DOM state. This can result in poor performance. Learn more about [forced reflows](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/forced-reflow) and possible mitigations."
}

Sign in to see 39 other issues and the full report

Create a free account to unlock every issue, evidence details, exports, and higher free limits.

Email code

Fix with MCP or CLI

Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.

Fix with MCP / CLI

Score history

Public scan score over time

Public reports for this website origin. Select any point or report link to open that canonical report.

1 reports
Public score history report links
Scan dateScoreReadinessReport
48/100Level 2, Agent-LimitedCurrent report