Export Report
OVERALL SCORE
Level 3, Bot-Aware
- AI Discoverability 59 out of 100
- Agent Ease of Use 62 out of 100
- Security & Trust 94 out of 100
- GEO, AIO and AEO 61 out of 100
- SEO 100 out of 100
- Performance 90 out of 100
- Accessibility 44 out of 100
What AI sees of your website
Women’s Fashion, Beauty & Lifestyle – SHEfinds
We help busy women find the things they need to enjoy their life.
Next step
Turn this report into a fix workflow
2 failed checks are ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.
| Metric | Score | Status | Passed | Failed | Warning | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI Discoverability | 59 | Needs work | 29 | 1 | 0 | View details |
| Discoverability | 67 | Needs work | 8 | 0 | 0 | |
| Content Readiness | 69 | Needs work | 20 | 0 | 0 | |
| Bot Access Control | 45 | Priority fix | 1 | 1 | 0 | View details |
| Agent Ease of Use | 62 | Needs work | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| API | 67 | Needs work | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Google Agentic Browsing | 100 | Strong | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| GEO, AIO and AEO | 61 | Needs work | 8 | 0 | 0 | |
| GEO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| AIO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 4 | 0 | 0 | |
| AEO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| SEO | 100 | Strong | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| SEO | 100 | Strong | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| Security & Trust | 94 | Strong | 26 | 1 | 1 | View details |
| Security & Trust | 94 | Strong | 26 | 1 | 1 | View details |
| Performance | 90 | Strong | 17 | 1 | 0 | View details |
| Performance | 90 | Strong | 17 | 1 | 0 | View details |
Prioritized recommendations
Issues ranked by score impact
3 items need attention
AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEstablished
AI bot rules in robots.txt
AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".
69 Fail
AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEstablished
AI bot rules in robots.txt
AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".
Needs attention
AI bot rules in robots.txt
Issue
No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.
Details
Why it matters
AI crawler product tokens have different meanings. Explicit robots.txt groups make training, search, and retrieval access policy auditable for compliant crawler operators.
Check name
AI bot rules in robots.txt
Score
31/100
Status
fail
Category
Bot Access Control
Maturity
Established
Goal
Declare deliberate robots.txt rules for major AI training, AI search, user-triggered, and dataset crawlers.
Result
AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".
Validation steps
Classify AI crawler rules
No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.
robots.txt lacks explicit AI crawler rules
Evidence log1 step · 6 lines
Classify AI crawler rules [fail]! No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.INFOClassify AI crawler rulesINFOParsing User-agent groups and Allow/Disallow records for known AI crawler tokens evaluatedPath="/"INFOEvaluating exact User-agent matches before wildcard fallback exactAiPolicyCount=0 totalCrawlerTokens=18FAILNo explicit AI crawler User-agent groups were found examplesExpected=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ClaudeBot","Google-Extended","CCBot"]FAILCompare explicit AI crawler coverage actual=0 expected="> 0 explicit non-search AI crawler policies" missingTokens=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ChatGPT-User","ClaudeBot","Claude-SearchBot","Claude-User","Google-Extended","Applebot-Extended","Amazonbot","Amzn-SearchBot","Amzn-User","PerplexityBot"]INFOResolved effective root-path policy for crawler tokens blocked=0 allowed=21 unspecified=0Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Content-Security-Policy
Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate script execution".
27 Fail
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Content-Security-Policy
Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate script execution".
Needs attention
Content-Security-Policy
Issue
script-src leaves script execution broadly unrestricted.
Details
Why it matters
Content Security Policy reduces the impact of injection bugs by limiting where scripts, styles, frames, forms, and other browser resources can load or execute.
Check name
Content-Security-Policy
Score
73/100
Status
fail
Category
Security & Trust
Maturity
Established
Goal
Constrain browser resource loading and script execution with an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.
Result
Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate script execution".
Validation steps
Evaluate script execution
script-src leaves script execution broadly unrestricted.
CSP script execution policy is unsafe
Review CSP reporting
CSP does not define a reporting endpoint.
CSP reporting is missing or incomplete
Evidence log2 steps · 8 lines
Evaluate script execution [fail]! script-src leaves script execution broadly unrestricted.INFOEvaluate script executionINFOInspect effective script directive effectiveDirective="script-src" sources=["'self'","'unsafe-inline'","'unsafe-eval'","https:"]FAILCompare script execution posture actual={"hasNonce":false,"hasHash":false,"hasStrictDynamic":false,"hasUnsafeInline":true,"hasUnsafeEval":true,"hasWildcardHost":false,"hasBroadScheme":true,"dangerousSchemes":[]} expected="constrained script sources without unsafe execution allowances" issue="script-src leaves script execution broadly unrestricted."FAILscript-src leaves script execution broadly unrestricted.Review CSP reporting [warning]! CSP does not define a reporting endpoint.INFOReview CSP reportingINFOInspect CSP reporting directives reportOnlyHeaderPresent=false reportOnlyDirectives=[]WARNCompare violation reporting configuration actual="no reporting endpoint" expected="report-to or report-uri present" issue="CSP does not define a reporting endpoint."WARNCSP does not define a reporting endpoint.
PerformancePerformanceBrowser audit
Font display
100 Fail
PerformancePerformanceBrowser audit
Font display
Check name
Font display
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Device
desktop
Category
Performance
Estimated savings
Est savings of 720Â ms
Fix guidance
Consider setting [font-display](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/font-display) to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with [font metric overrides](https://developer.chrome.com/blog/font-fallbacks).
References
web.dev/learn/performanceEvidence
{
"displayValue": "Est savings of 720Â ms",
"description": "Consider setting [font-display](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/font-display) to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with [font metric overrides](https://developer.chrome.com/blog/font-fallbacks)."
}Sign in to see 35 other issues and the full report
Create a free account to unlock every issue, evidence details, exports, and higher free limits.
Fix with MCP or CLI
Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.
Score history
Public scan score over time
Public reports for this website origin. Select any point or report link to open that canonical report.
| Scan date | Score | Readiness | Report |
|---|---|---|---|
| 65/100 | Level 3, Bot-Aware | Current report |