Export Report
OVERALL SCORE
Level 3, Bot-Aware
- AI Discoverability 33 out of 100
- Agent Ease of Use 41 out of 100
- Security & Trust 86 out of 100
- GEO, AIO and AEO 46 out of 100
- SEO 100 out of 100
- Performance and Accessibility 95 out of 100
What AI sees of your website
Explore projects · GitLab
Heptapod FOSS public service
Next step
Turn this report into a fix workflow
18 failed checks are ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.
| Metric | Score | Status | Passed | Failed | Warning | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI Discoverability | 33 | Priority fix | 17 | 23 | 8 | View details |
| Discoverability | 28 | Priority fix | 3 | 6 | 0 | View details |
| Content Readiness | 24 | Priority fix | 12 | 14 | 4 | View details |
| Bot Access Control | 44 | Priority fix | 2 | 3 | 4 | View details |
| Agent Ease of Use | 41 | Priority fix | 10 | 16 | 13 | View details |
| API | 50 | Needs work | 4 | 3 | 0 | View details |
| Auth | 37 | Priority fix | 1 | 3 | 2 | View details |
| MCP | 37 | Priority fix | 3 | 5 | 3 | View details |
| Skill Discovery | 41 | Priority fix | 2 | 5 | 8 | View details |
| GEO, AIO and AEO | 46 | Priority fix | 5 | 5 | 8 | View details |
| GEO Readiness | 46 | Priority fix | 2 | 2 | 2 | View details |
| AIO Readiness | 66 | Needs work | 2 | 0 | 4 | |
| AEO Readiness | 26 | Priority fix | 1 | 3 | 2 | View details |
| SEO | 100 | Strong | 9 | 0 | 0 | |
| SEO | 100 | Strong | 9 | 0 | 0 | |
| Security & Trust | 86 | Mostly ready | 21 | 1 | 3 | View details |
| Security & Trust | 86 | Mostly ready | 21 | 1 | 3 | View details |
| Performance and Accessibility | 95 | Strong | 20 | 1 | 2 | View details |
| Performance | 93 | Strong | 18 | 1 | 2 | View details |
| Accessibility | 100 | Strong | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Prioritized recommendations
Issues ranked by score impact
42 items need attention
Agent Ease of UseAPIEstablished
OpenAPI discovery
OpenAPI discovery failed at "Parse OpenAPI document".
50 Fail
Agent Ease of UseAPIEstablished
OpenAPI discovery
OpenAPI discovery failed at "Parse OpenAPI document".
Needs attention
OpenAPI discovery
Issue
OpenAPI candidate was not parseable as JSON or YAML-like OpenAPI.
Why it matters
OpenAPI documents let agents understand operations, schemas, authentication, servers, and request/response formats before calling an API.
Check name
OpenAPI discovery
Score
50/100
Status
fail
Category
API
Maturity
Established
Goal
Publish a valid OpenAPI or Swagger document for public API discovery when this origin exposes public APIs.
Result
OpenAPI discovery failed at "Parse OpenAPI document".
Validation steps
Parse OpenAPI document
OpenAPI candidate was not parseable as JSON or YAML-like OpenAPI.
Validate OpenAPI shape
Response is not valid JSON and does not match baseline OpenAPI YAML shape.
Check machine-usable details
Add servers, parameters, request bodies, response schemas, operation IDs, tags, examples, and security or explicit no-auth declarations where they apply.
Evidence log3 steps · 14 lines
Parse OpenAPI document [fail]! OpenAPI candidate was not parseable as JSON or YAML-like OpenAPI.INFOParse OpenAPI document status="fail"INFOParse selected document as JSON first, then YAML-like OpenAPI parsed=false format="unknown" versionFamily="missing"FAILCheck parse result actual="not parseable" expected="parseable OpenAPI 3.x or Swagger 2.0 document" compatibleContentType=falseFAILOpenAPI candidate was not parseable as JSON or YAML-like OpenAPI.Validate OpenAPI shape [fail]! Response is not valid JSON and does not match baseline OpenAPI YAML shape.INFOValidate OpenAPI shape status="fail"INFOValidate required OpenAPI shape versionFamily="missing" pathCount=0 webhookCount=0 operationCount=0PASSCheck operations define responses actual=0 expected="every operation should define responses"FAILCheck info metadata actual={"hasInfoTitle":false,"hasInfoVersion":false} expected="info.title and info.version present"FAILOpenAPI shape issue issue="Response is not valid JSON and does not match baseline OpenAPI YAML shape."FAILResponse is not valid JSON and does not match baseline OpenAPI YAML shape.Check machine-usable details [fail]INFOCheck machine-usable details status="fail"INFOInspect machine-usable operation details hasServers=false hasSecuritySchemes=false hasExplicitNoAuth=false requestBodyOperationCount=0 parameterOperationCount=0 responseSchemaOperationCount=0 operationIdCount=0 taggedOperationCount=0 exampleOperationCount=0PASSCheck OpenAPI operations include enough detail for agents to call them safely actual="no machine-usability warnings" expected="servers, auth/no-auth signals, operationIds, parameters, request bodies, responses, tags, and examples where relevant"FAILOpenAPI discovery validation failed.
Agent Ease of UseMCPEmerging recommendation
MCP Server Card
MCP Server Card failed at "Validate server-card shape".
35 Fail
Agent Ease of UseMCPEmerging recommendation
MCP Server Card
MCP Server Card failed at "Validate server-card shape".
Needs attention
MCP Server Card
Issue
MCP Server Card response is not valid JSON.
Why it matters
MCP server cards give agents a stable, public pre-connection discovery surface for server identity, remote transports, protocol compatibility, and safe routing without guessing endpoints.
Check name
MCP Server Card
Score
30/100
Status
fail
Category
MCP
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Publish an MCP Server Card that helps agents discover remote MCP server transports before opening a session.
Result
MCP Server Card failed at "Validate server-card shape".
Validation steps
Discover MCP server card
The MCP server card was found only at a transitional or linked path.
Validate server-card shape
MCP Server Card response is not valid JSON.
Validate MCP remotes
No usable MCP remote transport was declared.
Validate HTTP delivery
Content-Type "text/html; charset=utf-8" is not JSON.
Probe same-origin MCP endpoint
No MCP remote endpoint could be probed.
Evidence log5 steps · 37 lines
Discover MCP server card [warning]! The MCP server card was found only at a transitional or linked path.INFODiscover MCP server card candidateCount=5INFOBuild MCP server-card candidate list currentPath="/.well-known/mcp-server-card" transitionalPaths=["/.well-known/mcp/server-card.json","/.well-known/mcp/server-cards.json","/mcp.json","/.well-known/mcp.json"] linkedPaths=[]INFOTrying to fetch /.well-known/mcp-server-card url="https://foss.heptapod.net/.well-known/mcp-server-card" source="current"FAIL/.well-known/mcp-server-card did not return a usable server card statusCode=404 contentType="text/html"INFOTrying to fetch /.well-known/mcp/server-card.json url="https://foss.heptapod.net/.well-known/mcp/server-card.json" source="transitional"FAIL/.well-known/mcp/server-card.json did not return a usable server card statusCode=404 contentType="text/html"INFOTrying to fetch /.well-known/mcp/server-cards.json url="https://foss.heptapod.net/.well-known/mcp/server-cards.json" source="transitional"FAIL/.well-known/mcp/server-cards.json did not return a usable server card statusCode=404 contentType="text/html"INFOTrying to fetch /mcp.json url="https://foss.heptapod.net/mcp.json" source="transitional"PASS/mcp.json returned a successful response statusCode=200 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8" finalUrl="https://foss.heptapod.net/users/sign_in"INFOTrying to fetch /.well-known/mcp.json url="https://foss.heptapod.net/.well-known/mcp.json" source="transitional"FAIL/.well-known/mcp.json did not return a usable server card statusCode=404 contentType="text/html"WARNCheck selected card is published at the current well-known path actual="/mcp.json" expected="/.well-known/mcp-server-card" source="transitional" finalUrl="https://foss.heptapod.net/users/sign_in"WARNMCP server card was discovered through a transitional or linked path path="/mcp.json" source="transitional" reason="The MCP server card was found only at a transitional or linked path."Validate server-card shape [fail]! MCP Server Card response is not valid JSON.INFOValidate server-card shape profile="unknown-json"FAILCheck response body parsed as JSON actual=false expected=trueFAILCheck Content-Type is JSON-compatible actual=false expected=trueFAILCheck recognized MCP server-card profile actual="unknown-json" expected="sep-2127-draft"PASSCheck required card fields are present actual=0 expected=0 missing=[]PASSCheck MCP server-card uses the current remotes[] profile without legacy compatibility warnings actual="no compatibility warnings" expected="current sep-2127-draft card shape with no legacy compatibility warnings" warnings=[]FAILMCP server-card shape validation failed reason="MCP Server Card response is not valid JSON."Validate MCP remotes [fail]! No usable MCP remote transport was declared.INFOValidate MCP remotes remoteCount=0FAILCheck at least one MCP remote is declared actual=0 expected="> 0"PASSCheck invalid remote count actual=0 expected=0 invalidRemotes=[]PASSCheck same-origin remote coverage actual=0 expected=0FAILMCP remote validation failed reason="No usable MCP remote transport was declared."Validate HTTP delivery [fail]! Content-Type "text/html; charset=utf-8" is not JSON.INFOValidate HTTP delivery finalUrl="https://foss.heptapod.net/users/sign_in"PASSCheck server card returned HTTP 2xx actual=200 expected="200-299"FAILCheck card is served as JSON actual="text/html; charset=utf-8" expected="application/json or +json"PASSCheck card is served over HTTPS actual="https:" expected="https:"WARNCheck browser-readable CORS header actual="missing" expected="Access-Control-Allow-Origin present"PASSCheck cache header is present actual="max-age=0, private, must-revalidate" expected="Cache-Control present"FAILMCP server-card HTTP delivery failed issues=["Content-Type \"text/html; charset=utf-8\" is not JSON.","CORS header Access-Control-Allow-Origin is absent."] reason="Content-Type \"text/html; charset=utf-8\" is not JSON."Probe same-origin MCP endpoint [warning]! No MCP remote endpoint could be probed.INFOProbe same-origin MCP endpoint probeCount=0INFOSelecting same-origin unauthenticated MCP remotes for a bounded initialize probeWARNCheck successful initialize probe count actual=0 expected="> 0 when a safe same-origin unauthenticated remote exists" activeProbeCount=0 authBlocked=0WARNMCP endpoint probe could not fully confirm operability reason="No MCP remote endpoint could be probed."
AI DiscoverabilityDiscoverabilityEstablished
Link headers
Link headers failed at "Find useful Link headers".
33 Fail
AI DiscoverabilityDiscoverabilityEstablished
Link headers
Link headers failed at "Find useful Link headers".
Needs attention
Link headers
Issue
No useful agent discovery Link headers were found.
Why it matters
Link headers let automated clients discover API catalogs, documentation, and machine-readable alternates without parsing page markup first.
Check name
Link headers
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Category
Discoverability
Maturity
Established
Goal
Include Link response headers for agent discovery using RFC 8288.
Result
Link headers failed at "Find useful Link headers".
Validation steps
Find useful Link headers
No useful agent discovery Link headers were found.
Fetch same-origin Link header targets
Link headers did not expose any same-origin targets to validate.
Evidence log2 steps · 9 lines
Find useful Link headers [fail]! No useful agent discovery Link headers were found.INFOFind useful Link headersINFOParse response Link header linkCount=0FAILCompare registered agent-useful relation count actual=0 expected="> 0"FAILCompare community relation count actual=0 expected="accepted as weaker evidence"FAILNo useful agent discovery Link headers were found.Fetch same-origin Link header targets [fail]! Link headers did not expose any same-origin targets to validate.INFOFetch same-origin Link header targetsINFOFetch same-origin Link header targets and record external skipsFAILCompare same-origin Link target failures actual=1 expected=0FAILLink headers did not expose any same-origin targets to validate.
Agent Ease of UseAuthEmerging recommendation
Auth.md Agent Registration
Auth.md Agent Registration failed at "Fetch and validate /auth.md".
30 Fail
Agent Ease of UseAuthEmerging recommendation
Auth.md Agent Registration
Auth.md Agent Registration failed at "Fetch and validate /auth.md".
Needs attention
Auth.md Agent Registration
Issue
auth.md response did not match Auth.md v1 agent registration guidance. Content-Type "text/html; charset=utf-8" is not Markdown or text/plain; missing OAuth Protected Resource Metadata discovery guidance; missing OAuth authorization-server metadata guidance; missing Auth.md credential type guidance; missing agent_verified/user_claimed or claim ceremony guidance; missing credential usage, expiry, error, or revocation guidance.
Why it matters
Human login and signup flows are often opaque to agents. Auth.md gives automated clients a stable registration contract instead of forcing them to scrape docs, automate browser forms, or guess credential flows.
Check name
Auth.md Agent Registration
Score
10/100
Status
fail
Category
Auth
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Publish Auth.md v1 metadata so agents can discover how to register, claim a user, and obtain credentials.
Result
Auth.md Agent Registration failed at "Fetch and validate /auth.md".
Validation steps
Fetch and validate /auth.md
auth.md response did not match Auth.md v1 agent registration guidance. Content-Type "text/html; charset=utf-8" is not Markdown or text/plain; missing OAuth Protected Resource Metadata discovery guidance; missing OAuth authorization-server metadata guidance; missing Auth.md credential type guidance; missing agent_verified/user_claimed or claim ceremony guidance; missing credential usage, expiry, error, or revocation guidance.
Validate protected resource metadata
OAuth Protected Resource Metadata could not be fetched.
Validate Auth.md authorization metadata
OAuth authorization-server metadata could not be fetched.
Evidence log3 steps · 21 lines
Fetch and validate /auth.md [fail]! auth.md response did not match Auth.md v1 agent registration guidance. Content-Type "text/html; charset=utf-8" is not Markdown or text/plain; missing OAuth Protected Resource Metadata discovery guidance; missing OAuth authorization-server metadata guidance; missing Auth.md credential type guidance; missing agent_verified/user_claimed or claim ceremony guidance; missing credential usage, expiry, error, or revocation guidance.INFOFetch and validate /auth.mdINFOFetch Auth.md-related resource path="/auth.md" statusCode=200 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8" bytes=15026FAILCompare response Content-Type with expected Auth.md media type actual=false expected=trueFAILCompare Auth.md/OAuth metadata validation result actual=false expected=trueFAILCompare Auth.md content length actual=14790 expected=">= 80 characters"WARNAuth.md validation warning warning="missing agent_verified/user_claimed or claim ceremony guidance"WARNAuth.md validation warning warning="missing credential usage, expiry, error, or revocation guidance"FAILAuth.md validation issue issue="auth.md response did not match Auth.md v1 agent registration guidance. Content-Type \"text/html; charset=utf-8\" is not Markdown or text/plain; missing OAuth Protected Resource Metadata discovery guidance; missing OAuth authorization-server metadata guidance; missing Auth.md credential type guidance; missing agent_verified/user_claimed or claim ceremony guidance; missing credential usage, expiry, error, or revocation guidance."FAILauth.md response did not match Auth.md v1 agent registration guidance. Content-Type "text/html; charset=utf-8" is not Markdown or text/plain; missing OAuth Protected Resource Metadata discovery guidance; missing OAuth authorization-server metadata guidance; missing Auth.md credential type guidance; missing agent_verified/user_claimed or claim ceremony guidance; missing credential usage, expiry, error, or revocation guidance.Validate protected resource metadata [fail]! OAuth Protected Resource Metadata could not be fetched.INFOValidate protected resource metadataINFOFetch Auth.md-related resource path="/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html" bytes=1593FAILCompare response Content-Type with expected Auth.md media type actual=false expected=trueFAILCompare Auth.md/OAuth metadata validation result actual=false expected=trueFAILAuth.md validation issue issue="OAuth Protected Resource Metadata could not be fetched."FAILOAuth Protected Resource Metadata could not be fetched.Validate Auth.md authorization metadata [fail]! OAuth authorization-server metadata could not be fetched.INFOValidate Auth.md authorization metadataINFOFetch Auth.md-related resource path="/.well-known/oauth-authorization-server" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html" bytes=1593FAILCompare response Content-Type with expected Auth.md media type actual=false expected=trueFAILCompare Auth.md/OAuth metadata validation result actual=false expected=trueFAILAuth.md validation issue issue="OAuth authorization-server metadata could not be fetched."FAILOAuth authorization-server metadata could not be fetched.
Agent Ease of UseMCPEmerging recommendation
WebMCP
WebMCP failed at "Probe WebMCP operability".
28 Fail
Agent Ease of UseMCPEmerging recommendation
WebMCP
WebMCP failed at "Probe WebMCP operability".
Needs attention
WebMCP
Issue
Discovered WebMCP static metadata was fetchable but invalid.
Details
Why it matters
WebMCP gives agents structured page and browser tool hints so they can understand actions without relying only on screen scraping.
Check name
WebMCP
Score
44/100
Status
fail
Category
MCP
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Expose browser/page WebMCP tools and compatible static WebMCP metadata when a site wants agents to understand in-page actions.
Result
WebMCP failed at "Probe WebMCP operability".
Validation steps
Detect WebMCP runtime API
WebMCP-like strings were found, but rendered browser evidence did not confirm a usable runtime API.
Probe WebMCP operability
Discovered WebMCP static metadata was fetchable but invalid.
WebMCP operability findings
- Discovered WebMCP static metadata was fetchable but invalid.
Validate declarative WebMCP form tools
No W3C-style declarative WebMCP form attributes were found.
Validate MCP-aware HTML annotations
No data-mcp-tool or hyphenated WebMCP compatibility annotations were found.
Validate static WebMCP JSON compatibility
A discovered WebMCP static manifest or WMCP interaction graph was invalid.
Body is not valid JSON.
Evidence log5 steps · 23 lines
Detect WebMCP runtime API [warning]! WebMCP-like strings were found, but rendered browser evidence did not confirm a usable runtime API.INFODetect WebMCP runtime API status="warning"INFOProbe rendered browser for WebMCP runtime objects WARNCheck current W3C runtime API actual="not detected" expected="document.modelContext/registerTool available"WARNWebMCP-like strings were found, but rendered browser evidence did not confirm a usable runtime API.Probe WebMCP operability [fail]! Discovered WebMCP static metadata was fetchable but invalid.INFOProbe WebMCP operability status="fail"INFORun safe WebMCP operability checks safeProbeOnly=trueFAILCheck usable WebMCP evidence actual=0 expected="at least 1 usable runtime, declarative, annotation, or static manifest signal"FAILWebMCP operability failure issue="Discovered WebMCP static metadata was fetchable but invalid."FAILDiscovered WebMCP static metadata was fetchable but invalid.Validate declarative WebMCP form tools [informational]! No W3C-style declarative WebMCP form attributes were found.INFOValidate declarative WebMCP form tools status="informational"INFOInspect visible forms and controls for current declarative WebMCP attributes annotatedElements=0 formsWithAttributes=0 controlsWithAttributes=0SKIPValidate declarative WebMCP attribute quality actual=0 expected=0INFONo W3C-style declarative WebMCP form attributes were found. status="informational"Validate MCP-aware HTML annotations [informational]! No data-mcp-tool or hyphenated WebMCP compatibility annotations were found.INFOValidate MCP-aware HTML annotations status="informational"INFOInspect HTML for MCP compatibility annotations compatibilityAttributeCount=0 dataMcpToolCount=0 examples=[]SKIPValidate compatibility annotation quality actual=0 expected=0INFONo data-mcp-tool or hyphenated WebMCP compatibility annotations were found. status="informational"Validate static WebMCP JSON compatibility [fail]! A discovered WebMCP static manifest or WMCP interaction graph was invalid.INFOValidate static WebMCP JSON compatibility status="fail"INFODiscover static WebMCP manifest candidates conventionalPaths=["/.well-known/webmcp.json","/webmcp.json"] checkedCount=2 profileCounts={"unknown-webmcp-json":1}INFOWebMCP manifest candidate checked source="path" path="/.well-known/webmcp.json" url="https://foss.heptapod.net/.well-known/webmcp.json" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html"PASSWebMCP manifest candidate found source="path" path="/webmcp.json" url="https://foss.heptapod.net/webmcp.json" statusCode=200 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8"FAILValidate discovered static WebMCP metadata actual={"validManifestCount":0,"invalidManifestCount":1,"toolCount":0,"wmcpActionCount":0} expected="at least 1 valid tools[] manifest or WMCP graph when static metadata is present"FAILA discovered WebMCP static manifest or WMCP interaction graph was invalid.
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
HSTS header
HSTS header failed at "Find Strict-Transport-Security".
25 Fail
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
HSTS header
HSTS header failed at "Find Strict-Transport-Security".
Needs attention
HSTS header
Issue
HTTPS response is missing Strict-Transport-Security.
Why it matters
HSTS tells browsers to keep using HTTPS after the first secure visit, reducing downgrade, SSL-stripping, and mixed-transport risk for repeat users.
Check name
HSTS header
Score
50/100
Status
fail
Category
Security & Trust
Maturity
Established
Goal
Require HTTPS for repeat browser visits with a valid Strict-Transport-Security policy.
Result
HSTS header failed at "Find Strict-Transport-Security".
Validation steps
Find Strict-Transport-Security
HTTPS response is missing Strict-Transport-Security.
Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Find Strict-Transport-Security [fail]! HTTPS response is missing Strict-Transport-Security.INFOFind Strict-Transport-SecurityINFORead Strict-Transport-Security header header="strict-transport-security" value="missing" effectiveValue=null duplicateHeaderValueCount=0FAILRequire HSTS header on HTTPS response actual="missing" expected="present" issue="HTTPS response is missing Strict-Transport-Security."FAILHTTPS response is missing Strict-Transport-Security.AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Content freshness signals
Content freshness signals is missing or incomplete.
20 Fail
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Content freshness signals
Content freshness signals is missing or incomplete.
Needs attention
Content freshness signals
Issue
Content freshness signals are incomplete: missing any valid freshness date in Last-Modified, Schema.org, Open Graph, Dublin Core, generic meta, or sitemap lastmod.
Details
Why it matters
Freshness signals help agents, crawlers, and search systems decide whether content is current enough to cite, summarize, cache, or compare against newer sources.
Check name
Content freshness signals
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Category
Content Readiness
Maturity
Established
Goal
Expose modified and published dates for freshness-aware retrieval, citation, and ranking.
Result
Content freshness signals is missing or incomplete.
Validation steps
Validate Last-Modified header
No valid Last-Modified HTTP header was found.
Validate structured freshness dates
No Schema.org freshness dates were found.
Validate metadata freshness dates
No Open Graph, Dublin Core, or generic meta freshness date was found.
Corroborate with sitemap lastmod
Add a sitemap entry with a valid lastmod for the canonical page URL when sitemap corroboration is useful.
Evidence log4 steps · 16 lines
Validate Last-Modified header [fail]! No valid Last-Modified HTTP header was found.INFOValidate Last-Modified headerINFOReading Last-Modified response headerFAILCheck Last-Modified header is present and parseable actual="missing" expected="valid" alternateDates=[]FAILLast-Modified header is missing or invalidValidate structured freshness dates [fail]! No Schema.org freshness dates were found.INFOValidate structured freshness datesINFOCollecting Schema.org freshness dates from JSON-LD, Microdata, and RDFaFAILCheck structured freshness date count actual=0 expected="> 0" invalidDateCount=0 formats={} alternateDates=[]FAILNo structured freshness dates foundValidate metadata freshness dates [fail]! No Open Graph, Dublin Core, or generic meta freshness date was found.INFOValidate metadata freshness datesINFOCollecting Open Graph, Dublin Core, and generic meta freshness datesFAILCheck metadata freshness date count actual=0 expected="> 0" metaDateCount=0 invalidDateCount=0 alternateDates=[]FAILNo metadata freshness dates foundCorroborate with sitemap lastmod [warning]INFOCorroborate with sitemap lastmodINFODiscovering sitemap candidates and matching the scanned page URL candidateCount=1 attempts=1WARNCheck matching sitemap lastmod actual="no match" expected="valid match when available" robotsStatusCode=200WARNNo matching sitemap lastmod found after sitemap attempts attempts=1
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Organization / WebSite schema
Organization / WebSite schema is missing or incomplete.
20 Fail
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Organization / WebSite schema
Organization / WebSite schema is missing or incomplete.
Needs attention
Organization / WebSite schema
Issue
No Organization or Organization subtype was found in Schema.org structured data. No WebSite entity was found in Schema.org structured data. Missing identity field(s): Organization.name, Organization.url, WebSite.name, WebSite.url. WebSite.publisher is missing. Organization schema is missing logo and sameAs or public contact evidence.
Why it matters
Organization and WebSite schema help agents identify the publisher, canonical site identity, logo, and related profiles for attribution.
Check name
Organization / WebSite schema
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Category
Content Readiness
Maturity
Established
Goal
Identify the site owner and website entity in structured data.
Result
Organization / WebSite schema is missing or incomplete.
Validation steps
Organization entity
No Organization or Organization subtype was found in Schema.org structured data.
WebSite entity
No WebSite entity was found in Schema.org structured data.
Identity fields
Missing identity field(s): Organization.name, Organization.url, WebSite.name, WebSite.url.
WebSite publisher linkage
WebSite.publisher is missing.
Organization trust fields
Organization schema is missing logo and sameAs or public contact evidence.
Evidence log5 steps · 23 lines
Organization entity [fail]! No Organization or Organization subtype was found in Schema.org structured data.INFOOrganization entityINFOLooking for Organization or Organization subtype in structured data observedTypes=[]FAILCheck Organization entity presence actual=false expected=true fields=[{"name":"Organization.@type","present":false},{"name":"Organization.@id","present":false},{"name":"Organization.name","present":false},{"name":"Organization.url","present":false},{"name":"Organization.logo","present":false},{"name":"Organization.sameAs","present":false}]FAILOrganization entity is missingWebSite entity [fail]! No WebSite entity was found in Schema.org structured data.INFOWebSite entityINFOLooking for WebSite entity in structured data FAILCheck WebSite entity presence actual=false expected=true fields=[{"name":"WebSite.@type","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.@id","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.name","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.url","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.publisher.@id","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.publisher.name","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.publisher.url","present":false}]FAILWebSite entity is missingIdentity fields [fail]! Missing identity field(s): Organization.name, Organization.url, WebSite.name, WebSite.url.INFOIdentity fieldsINFOChecking Organization and WebSite name/url fields FAILCheck required identity fields actual=0 expected=4 missing=["Organization.name","Organization.url","WebSite.name","WebSite.url"] organizationFields=[{"name":"Organization.@type","present":false},{"name":"Organization.@id","present":false},{"name":"Organization.name","present":false},{"name":"Organization.url","present":false},{"name":"Organization.logo","present":false},{"name":"Organization.sameAs","present":false}] websiteFields=[{"name":"WebSite.@type","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.@id","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.name","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.url","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.publisher.@id","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.publisher.name","present":false},{"name":"WebSite.publisher.url","present":false}]WARNCheck identity URLs match scanned origin actual={"organizationUrlMatchesOrigin":false,"websiteUrlMatchesOrigin":false} expected={"organizationUrlMatchesOrigin":true,"websiteUrlMatchesOrigin":true}FAILIdentity fields are missing missing=["Organization.name","Organization.url","WebSite.name","WebSite.url"]WebSite publisher linkage [fail]! WebSite.publisher is missing.INFOWebSite publisher linkageINFOChecking whether WebSite.publisher points to the Organization entity FAILCheck publisher presence actual=false expected=true publisher={"present":false,"matchesOrganization":false} website={} organization={}FAILCheck publisher matches Organization actual=false expected=trueFAILWebSite publisher is missingOrganization trust fields [fail]! Organization schema is missing logo and sameAs or public contact evidence.INFOOrganization trust fieldsINFOChecking logo, sameAs, and public contact evidence FAILCheck logo presence actual=false expected=true fields=[{"name":"Organization.logo","present":false},{"name":"Organization.sameAs","present":false},{"name":"Organization.contactPoint","present":false},{"name":"Organization.telephone","present":false},{"name":"Organization.email","present":false},{"name":"Organization.address","present":false}]FAILCheck sameAs or contact evidence actual=0 expected=">= 1" sameAsCount=0 contactSignalCount=0 fields=[{"name":"Organization.logo","present":false},{"name":"Organization.sameAs","present":false},{"name":"Organization.contactPoint","present":false},{"name":"Organization.telephone","present":false},{"name":"Organization.email","present":false},{"name":"Organization.address","present":false}]FAILOrganization trust fields are missing
AI DiscoverabilityDiscoverabilityEstablished
robots.txt
robots.txt failed at "Validate RFC 9309 core syntax".
20 Fail
AI DiscoverabilityDiscoverabilityEstablished
robots.txt
robots.txt failed at "Validate RFC 9309 core syntax".
Needs attention
robots.txt
Issue
robots.txt was found but did not contain a valid, parseable User-agent group.
Why it matters
robots.txt gives crawlers and agents a standard place to read crawl permissions, disallowed paths, and sitemap locations before requesting site content.
Check name
robots.txt
Score
40/100
Status
fail
Category
Discoverability
Maturity
Established
Goal
Publish /robots.txt with clear crawl rules.
Result
robots.txt failed at "Validate RFC 9309 core syntax".
Validation steps
Validate RFC 9309 core syntax
robots.txt was found but did not contain a valid, parseable User-agent group.
Evidence log1 step · 5 lines
Validate RFC 9309 core syntax [fail]! robots.txt was found but did not contain a valid, parseable User-agent group.INFOValidate RFC 9309 core syntaxINFOParsing robots.txt into User-agent groups and Allow/Disallow recordsPASSCheck User-agent group count actual=4 expected=">= 1 parseable group" parsedUserAgents=["*"]FAILCheck malformed lines and orphan Allow/Disallow records actual={"invalidLines":0,"orphanRecords":3} expected={"invalidLines":0,"orphanRecords":0}FAILAllow/Disallow records appeared before any User-agent group orphanRecords=[{"directive":"allow","value":"/users/sign_in","line":32},{"directive":"allow","value":"/users/sign_up","line":33},{"directive":"allow","value":"/users/*/snippets","line":34}]Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation
agents.json
agents.json failed at "Validate Wildcard schema shape".
19 Fail
Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation
agents.json
agents.json failed at "Validate Wildcard schema shape".
Needs attention
agents.json
Issue
agents.json response is not valid JSON.
Why it matters
Wildcard agents.json gives agents workflow-level context beyond plain OpenAPI, including flows, links, examples, and API action structure. It is an emerging OpenAPI-adjacent proposal, so scanners should validate the contract shape without treating it as an A2A or IETF standard.
Check name
agents.json
Score
25/100
Status
fail
Category
Skill Discovery
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Publish a Wildcard-style agents.json file so agents can discover OpenAPI-backed workflows, links, examples, and authentication requirements.
Result
agents.json failed at "Validate Wildcard schema shape".
Validation steps
Discover agents.json
agents.json was found only at the fallback /agents.json path.
Validate Wildcard schema shape
agents.json response is not valid JSON.
Validate API actions
Wildcard agents.json must include valid OpenAPI-derived action or operation definitions.
Validate flows and links
No executable flows were found.
Review examples and LLM usability
Examples or descriptions are too thin for reliable agent argument generation.
Evidence log5 steps · 23 lines
Discover agents.json [warning]! agents.json was found only at the fallback /agents.json path.INFODiscover agents.jsonINFOTry agents.json discovery paths in priority order paths=["/.well-known/agents.json","/agents.json"]WARNagents.json candidate path did not return a usable contract path="/.well-known/agents.json" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html"PASSFound an agents.json candidate path="/agents.json" statusCode=200 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8" bytes=15026WARNSelected fallback agents.json location path="/agents.json" requestedUrl="https://foss.heptapod.net/agents.json"WARNagents.json was found only at the fallback /agents.json path.Validate Wildcard schema shape [fail]! agents.json response is not valid JSON.INFOValidate Wildcard schema shapeINFOParse agents.json and classify contract shape shape="unknown"FAILCompare contract shape actual="unknown" expected="wildcard"FAILCompare missing required schema fields actual="none" expected="none"FAILCompare Content-Type with JSON expectation actual=false expected=trueFAILagents.json response is not valid JSON.Validate API actions [fail]! Wildcard agents.json must include valid OpenAPI-derived action or operation definitions.INFOValidate API actionsFAILCompare API action count actual=0 expected="> 0"FAILCompare invalid action definitions actual=0 expected=0FAILWildcard agents.json must include valid OpenAPI-derived action or operation definitions.Validate flows and links [fail]! No executable flows were found.INFOValidate flows and linksFAILCompare workflow flow count actual=0 expected="> 0"FAILCompare operation link issues actual=0 expected=0FAILNo executable flows were found.Review examples and LLM usability [warning]! Examples or descriptions are too thin for reliable agent argument generation.INFOReview examples and LLM usabilityWARNCompare usable example count actual=0 expected="> 0 when actions are present"WARNExamples or descriptions are too thin for reliable agent argument generation.
AI DiscoverabilityDiscoverabilityEstablished
Sitemap
Sitemap failed at "Parse sitemap".
18 Fail
AI DiscoverabilityDiscoverabilityEstablished
Sitemap
Sitemap failed at "Parse sitemap".
Needs attention
Sitemap
Issue
Fetched sitemap content was not a valid sitemap with absolute HTTP(S) URL entries.
Why it matters
Sitemaps help crawlers and agents discover canonical URLs, update timestamps, and deeper content that may not be obvious from homepage navigation alone.
Check name
Sitemap
Score
45/100
Status
fail
Category
Discoverability
Maturity
Established
Goal
Publish a standards-aligned sitemap or sitemap index at a discoverable URL.
Result
Sitemap failed at "Parse sitemap".
Validation steps
Parse sitemap
Fetched sitemap content was not a valid sitemap with absolute HTTP(S) URL entries.
Validate sitemap field quality
No valid sitemap was available for field-quality validation.
Validate URL scope
No valid sitemap was available for URL scope validation.
Evidence log3 steps · 10 lines
Parse sitemap [fail]! Fetched sitemap content was not a valid sitemap with absolute HTTP(S) URL entries.INFOParse sitemapINFOInspecting fetched sitemap content url="https://foss.heptapod.net/sitemap.xml" contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8" statusCode=200FAILCheck sitemap contains at least one URL entry or child sitemap entry actual=0 expected="> 0"PASSCheck loc values are absolute HTTP(S) URLs actual=0 expected=0 invalidLocs=[]FAILFetched content was not a valid sitemap format="unknown"Validate sitemap field quality [fail]! No valid sitemap was available for field-quality validation.INFOValidate sitemap field qualitySKIPSkipped field-quality checks because no valid sitemap was availableValidate URL scope [fail]! No valid sitemap was available for URL scope validation.INFOValidate URL scope origin="https://foss.heptapod.net"INFOChecking listed URLs against the scanned origin hostSKIPSkipped URL-scope checks because no valid sitemap was available
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Markdown negotiation
Markdown negotiation is missing or incomplete.
18 Fail
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Markdown negotiation
Markdown negotiation is missing or incomplete.
Needs attention
Markdown negotiation
Issue
Best candidate returned Content-Type "text/html; charset=utf-8" instead of text/markdown.
Why it matters
Markdown representations give agents a cleaner page form while preserving normal HTML for browsers and cache-safe representation handling.
Check name
Markdown negotiation
Score
10/100
Status
fail
Category
Content Readiness
Maturity
Established
Goal
Expose a useful Markdown representation through negotiation or an explicit alternate URL.
Result
Markdown negotiation is missing or incomplete.
Validation steps
Markdown representation
No usable Markdown representation was found through negotiation, advertised alternates, or conservative .md mirror checks.
Same-URL negotiation
Same-URL Accept: text/markdown did not return a valid Markdown representation.
Markdown format validation
Markdown response contains too much raw HTML to be a clean agent-facing Markdown representation.
Advertised Markdown alternate
No Link or HTML rel=alternate text/markdown URL was advertised.
Conventional .md mirror
Conventional .md mirror candidates did not return valid Markdown.
Evidence log5 steps · 15 lines
Markdown representation [fail]! No usable Markdown representation was found through negotiation, advertised alternates, or conservative .md mirror checks.INFOMarkdown representationFAILCheck usable Markdown representation was selected actual={"source":"negotiated","url":"https://foss.heptapod.net/explore/projects/active","statusCode":200,"contentType":"text/html; charset=utf-8","mediaType":"text/html","vary":"Accept","requireVaryAccept":true,"contentTypeStatus":"fail","cacheStatus":"pass","bodyStatus":"fail","pass":false,"quality":{"valid":false,"formatStatus":"fail","dialect":"html-heavy","hasHeading":false,"headingCount":0,"wordCount":1603,"features":{"markdownLinks":0,"referenceLinks":0,"listItems":0,"tables":0,"taskListItems":0,"fencedCodeBlocks":0,"yamlFrontmatter":false,"jsonLdFencedBlocks":0,"admonitions":0,"strikethrough":0,"autolinks":0,"rawHtmlTags":108,"jsxOrMdxSignals":0},"issues":["missing-heading","raw-html-heavy","plain-text-like"],"excerpt":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html class=\"gl-system ui-neutral with-top-bar with-header application-chrome page-with-panels with-gl-container-queries user-logged-out\" lang=\"en\">\n<head prefix=\"og: http://ogp.me/ns#\">\n<meta charset=\"utf-8\">\n<meta content","issue":"Markdown response contains too much raw HTML to be a clean agent-facing Markdown representation."}} expected="negotiated, advertised alternate, or conventional mirror" selected={"source":"negotiated","url":"https://foss.heptapod.net/explore/projects/active","statusCode":200,"contentType":"text/html; charset=utf-8","mediaType":"text/html","vary":"Accept","requireVaryAccept":true,"contentTypeStatus":"fail","cacheStatus":"pass","bodyStatus":"fail","pass":false,"quality":{"valid":false,"formatStatus":"fail","dialect":"html-heavy","hasHeading":false,"headingCount":0,"wordCount":1603,"features":{"markdownLinks":0,"referenceLinks":0,"listItems":0,"tables":0,"taskListItems":0,"fencedCodeBlocks":0,"yamlFrontmatter":false,"jsonLdFencedBlocks":0,"admonitions":0,"strikethrough":0,"autolinks":0,"rawHtmlTags":108,"jsxOrMdxSignals":0},"issues":["missing-heading","raw-html-heavy","plain-text-like"],"excerpt":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html class=\"gl-system ui-neutral with-top-bar with-header application-chrome page-with-panels with-gl-container-queries user-logged-out\" lang=\"en\">\n<head prefix=\"og: http://ogp.me/ns#\">\n<meta charset=\"utf-8\">\n<meta content","issue":"Markdown response contains too much raw HTML to be a clean agent-facing Markdown representation."}} candidatesChecked=2FAILMarkdown representation failed issue="No usable Markdown representation was found through negotiation, advertised alternates, or conservative .md mirror checks."Same-URL negotiation [fail]! Same-URL Accept: text/markdown did not return a valid Markdown representation.INFOSame-URL negotiationFAILCheck negotiated Markdown response actual={"statusCode":200,"mediaType":"text/html","vary":"Accept"} expected="HTTP 2xx text/markdown with Vary: Accept" url="https://foss.heptapod.net/explore/projects/active" statusCode=200 mediaType="text/html" vary="Accept"FAILSame-URL negotiation failed issue="Same-URL Accept: text/markdown did not return a valid Markdown representation."Markdown format validation [fail]! Markdown response contains too much raw HTML to be a clean agent-facing Markdown representation.INFOMarkdown format validationFAILCheck Markdown body quality actual={"valid":false,"wordCount":1603,"headingCount":0,"dialect":"html-heavy"} expected="valid Markdown with substantive text and headings" valid=false dialect="html-heavy" wordCount=1603 headingCount=0FAILMarkdown format validation failed issue="Markdown response contains too much raw HTML to be a clean agent-facing Markdown representation."Advertised Markdown alternate [warning]! No Link or HTML rel=alternate text/markdown URL was advertised.INFOAdvertised Markdown alternateWARNCheck advertised Markdown alternate candidates actual=0 expected="> 0 when HTML advertises a Markdown alternate" advertisedUrls=[] candidateCount=0WARNAdvertised Markdown alternate has a warning issue="No Link or HTML rel=alternate text/markdown URL was advertised."Conventional .md mirror [fail]! Conventional .md mirror candidates did not return valid Markdown.INFOConventional .md mirrorFAILCheck conventional Markdown mirror candidates actual=1 expected="> 0 when a conventional mirror is discoverable" conventionalUrls=["https://foss.heptapod.net/explore/projects/active.md"] candidateCount=1FAILConventional .md mirror failed issue="Conventional .md mirror candidates did not return valid Markdown."
Agent Ease of UseAuthEstablished
OAuth / OIDC discovery
OAuth / OIDC discovery has a validation warning at "Detect OAuth/OIDC applicability".
17 Warning
Agent Ease of UseAuthEstablished
OAuth / OIDC discovery
OAuth / OIDC discovery has a validation warning at "Detect OAuth/OIDC applicability".
Needs attention
OAuth / OIDC discovery
Issue
Generic authentication signals were found, but no OAuth/OIDC discovery signal was detected.
Why it matters
OAuth and OIDC discovery let agents and API clients find authorization, token, and key endpoints programmatically instead of scraping login pages or guessing provider setup.
Check name
OAuth / OIDC discovery
Score
50/100
Status
warning
Category
Auth
Maturity
Established
Goal
Publish OAuth/OIDC discovery metadata only when the site operates or advertises a real OAuth/OIDC authorization server.
Result
OAuth / OIDC discovery has a validation warning at "Detect OAuth/OIDC applicability".
Validation steps
Detect OAuth/OIDC applicability
Generic authentication signals were found, but no OAuth/OIDC discovery signal was detected.
Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Detect OAuth/OIDC applicability [warning]! Generic authentication signals were found, but no OAuth/OIDC discovery signal was detected.INFODetect OAuth/OIDC applicabilityINFOInspecting homepage, headers, and known auth/API signals for OAuth or OIDC claims applies=false signalsCount=0 genericAuthSignalsCount=1 checkedCount=2WARNCheck OAuth/OIDC applicability signal actual=false expected="true when metadata exists or OAuth/OIDC is claimed" checked=[{"path":"/.well-known/openid-configuration","statusCode":404,"contentType":"text/html","length":1593},{"path":"/.well-known/oauth-authorization-server","statusCode":404,"contentType":"text/html","length":1593}]WARNDetect OAuth/OIDC applicability completed with warnings issue="Generic authentication signals were found, but no OAuth/OIDC discovery signal was detected."Agent Ease of UseAuthEmerging recommendation
OAuth Protected Resource
OAuth Protected Resource has a validation warning at "Detect protected-resource applicability".
17 Warning
Agent Ease of UseAuthEmerging recommendation
OAuth Protected Resource
OAuth Protected Resource has a validation warning at "Detect protected-resource applicability".
Needs attention
OAuth Protected Resource
Issue
Generic authentication signals were found, but no OAuth Protected Resource metadata signal was detected.
Why it matters
Protected-resource metadata tells agents which API/resource is locked, which authorization servers can issue tokens for it, and how a 401 challenge maps back to the correct resource.
Check name
OAuth Protected Resource
Score
50/100
Status
warning
Category
Auth
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Publish OAuth Protected Resource Metadata for OAuth-protected APIs and MCP resources so clients can identify the resource and its authorization servers.
Result
OAuth Protected Resource has a validation warning at "Detect protected-resource applicability".
Validation steps
Detect protected-resource applicability
Generic authentication signals were found, but no OAuth Protected Resource metadata signal was detected.
Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Detect protected-resource applicability [warning]! Generic authentication signals were found, but no OAuth Protected Resource metadata signal was detected.INFODetect protected-resource applicabilityINFOInspecting auth headers, MCP/OAuth claims, and protected-resource hints applies=false requiresAuthorizationServers=false signalsCount=0 genericAuthSignalsCount=1 checkedCount=2WARNCheck protected-resource metadata applicability actual=false expected="true when RFC 9728 metadata exists or support is claimed" checked=[{"url":"https://foss.heptapod.net/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource","path":"/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource","source":"root-well-known","resourceIdentifier":"https://foss.heptapod.net","statusCode":404,"contentType":"text/html","length":1593},{"url":"https://foss.heptapod.net/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource/explore/projects/active","path":"/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource/explore/projects/active","source":"final-url-path","resourceIdentifier":"https://foss.heptapod.net/explore/projects/active","statusCode":404,"contentType":"text/html","length":1593}]WARNDetect protected-resource applicability completed with warnings issue="Generic authentication signals were found, but no OAuth Protected Resource metadata signal was detected."Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation
A2A Agent Card
A2A Agent Card failed at "Detect A2A card version".
15 Fail
Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation
A2A Agent Card
A2A Agent Card failed at "Detect A2A card version".
Needs attention
A2A Agent Card
Issue
The discovered JSON document does not match a supported A2A Agent Card version family.
Why it matters
A2A Agent Cards provide protocol-specific discovery for agent identity, skills, input and output modes, transport bindings, capabilities, and security requirements. Legacy A2A also used /.well-known/agent.json, so scanners must classify the card shape before reporting readiness.
Check name
A2A Agent Card
Score
39/100
Status
fail
Category
Skill Discovery
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Publish a version-appropriate A2A Agent Card so A2A-compatible clients can discover agent skills and invoke the declared endpoint safely.
Result
A2A Agent Card failed at "Detect A2A card version".
Validation steps
Discover A2A Agent Card
The A2A Agent Card was found at a legacy or fallback path.
Detect A2A card version
The discovered JSON document does not match a supported A2A Agent Card version family.
Validate version-specific card shape
A2A Agent Card response is not valid JSON.
Validate HTTP delivery
The card was parseable JSON but was not served with a JSON-compatible content type.
Probe same-origin A2A endpoint
A2A endpoint probing was skipped because the endpoint was cross-origin, unavailable from the card, or uses an unsupported binding.
Evidence log5 steps · 26 lines
Discover A2A Agent Card [warning]! The A2A Agent Card was found at a legacy or fallback path.INFODiscover A2A Agent CardINFOTry A2A discovery paths in priority order paths=["/.well-known/agent-card.json","/.well-known/agent.json","/agent-card.json","/.well-known/a2a/agent-card.json"]WARNA2A candidate path did not return a usable card path="/.well-known/agent-card.json" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html"WARNA2A candidate path did not return a usable card path="/.well-known/agent.json" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html"PASSFound an A2A candidate path="/agent-card.json" statusCode=200 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8" bytes=15026WARNA2A candidate path did not return a usable card path="/.well-known/a2a/agent-card.json" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html"WARNSelected non-canonical A2A Agent Card path="/agent-card.json" pathClass="fallback" requestedUrl="https://foss.heptapod.net/agent-card.json"WARNThe A2A Agent Card was found at a legacy or fallback path.Detect A2A card version [fail]! The discovered JSON document does not match a supported A2A Agent Card version family.INFODetect A2A card versionINFORead version indicators from the card detectionEvidence=[]FAILCompare detected A2A version family actual="unknown" expected="v0.1, v0.2, v0.3, or v1"FAILThe discovered JSON document does not match a supported A2A Agent Card version family.Validate version-specific card shape [fail]! A2A Agent Card response is not valid JSON.INFOValidate version-specific card shapeFAILCompare missing required card fields actual="none" expected="none"FAILCheck every declared A2A skill has required name, description, and endpoint fields actual=0 expected=0 invalidSkills=[]INFOReview declared endpoint interfaces interfaces=[]FAILA2A Agent Card response is not valid JSON.Validate HTTP delivery [warning]! The card was parseable JSON but was not served with a JSON-compatible content type.INFOValidate HTTP deliveryWARNCompare card Content-Type with JSON expectation actual="text/html; charset=utf-8" expected="application/json or +json"INFOReview selected discovery path path="/agent-card.json" pathClass="fallback"WARNHTTP delivery/path warning warning="card was found only at a non-standard fallback path"WARNThe card was parseable JSON but was not served with a JSON-compatible content type.Probe same-origin A2A endpoint [warning]! A2A endpoint probing was skipped because the endpoint was cross-origin, unavailable from the card, or uses an unsupported binding.INFOProbe same-origin A2A endpointINFOProbe same-origin A2A endpoint when scanner policy allows itSKIPSkipped endpoint probe reason="No valid A2A card was available to probe."WARNA2A endpoint probing was skipped because the endpoint was cross-origin, unavailable from the card, or uses an unsupported binding.
AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEstablished
AI bot rules in robots.txt
AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".
14 Fail
AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEstablished
AI bot rules in robots.txt
AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".
Needs attention
AI bot rules in robots.txt
Issue
No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.
Why it matters
AI crawler product tokens have different meanings. Explicit robots.txt groups make training, search, and retrieval access policy auditable for compliant crawler operators.
Check name
AI bot rules in robots.txt
Score
31/100
Status
fail
Category
Bot Access Control
Maturity
Established
Goal
Declare deliberate robots.txt rules for major AI training, AI search, user-triggered, and dataset crawlers.
Result
AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".
Validation steps
Classify AI crawler rules
No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.
Evidence log1 step · 6 lines
Classify AI crawler rules [fail]! No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.INFOClassify AI crawler rulesINFOParsing User-agent groups and Allow/Disallow records for known AI crawler tokens evaluatedPath="/"INFOEvaluating exact User-agent matches before wildcard fallback exactAiPolicyCount=0 totalCrawlerTokens=18FAILNo explicit AI crawler User-agent groups were found examplesExpected=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ClaudeBot","Google-Extended","CCBot"]FAILCompare explicit AI crawler coverage actual=0 expected="> 0 explicit non-search AI crawler policies" missingTokens=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ChatGPT-User","ClaudeBot","Claude-SearchBot","Claude-User","Google-Extended","Applebot-Extended","Amazonbot","Amzn-SearchBot","Amzn-User","PerplexityBot"]INFOResolved effective root-path policy for crawler tokens blocked=0 allowed=21 unspecified=0AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEmerging recommendation
llms.txt
llms.txt failed at "Validate Markdown discovery shape".
13 Fail
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEmerging recommendation
llms.txt
llms.txt failed at "Validate Markdown discovery shape".
Needs attention
llms.txt
Issue
llms.txt did not provide the minimum expected Markdown discovery shape.
Details
Why it matters
llms.txt is an emerging Markdown convention for giving language-model clients curated context and links before they crawl broadly. Broken, private, or low-signal links make the file much less useful even when it exists.
Check name
llms.txt
Score
34/100
Status
fail
Category
Content Readiness
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Publish a concise llms.txt index that helps agents discover useful public site context.
Result
llms.txt failed at "Validate Markdown discovery shape".
Validation steps
Validate Markdown discovery shape
llms.txt did not provide the minimum expected Markdown discovery shape.
Findings
- Content-Type "text/html; charset=utf-8" is not text/markdown, another Markdown type, or text/plain.
- Response looks like an HTML page rather than a Markdown/text llms.txt file.
- Missing H1 title, such as '# Example Docs'.
Score llms.txt structure and usefulness
llms.txt includes unsafe or private links that should not be advertised to agents.
Findings
- Missing a blockquote summary. The llms.txt proposal recommends a concise blockquote after the H1.
- Missing H2 sections for grouping important links.
- No Markdown-formatted links were found.
- Several links have vague labels or raw URL labels.
{ "truncated": true, "omittedCount": 2, "originalCount": 6 }
Probe sampled linked resources
Some sampled llms.txt links were broken, redirected unexpectedly, or did not return clearly agent-readable content.
Findings
- 1/17 probed links were broken or unreachable.
- 1/17 probed links did not look agent-readable.
Inspect optional llms-full.txt
Passed.
Evidence log4 steps · 27 lines
Validate Markdown discovery shape [fail]! llms.txt did not provide the minimum expected Markdown discovery shape.INFOValidate Markdown discovery shapeINFOChecking response compatibility, title, content length, and usable linksFAILCheck content type is Markdown-compatible text actual="text/html; charset=utf-8" expected="text/markdown, text/x-markdown, text/plain, or another Markdown text type"FAILCheck response is not HTML actual=true expected=falseFAILCheck H1 title is present actual=false expected=truePASSCheck minimum text length actual=17374 expected=">= 160"PASSCheck at least one usable public link actual=17 expected="> 0" linkCount=19FAILMarkdown discovery shape validation failedScore llms.txt structure and usefulness [fail]! llms.txt includes unsafe or private links that should not be advertised to agents.INFOScore llms.txt structure and usefulnessINFOChecking recommended summary, sections, link labels, agent-friendly links, duplicates, and unsafe targetsWARNCheck blockquote summary is present actual=false expected=trueWARNCheck H2 section count actual=0 expected="> 0"WARNCheck Markdown-formatted links actual=0 expected="> 0"FAILCheck unsafe/private link count actual=2 expected=0FAILllms.txt structure-quality validation failed reason="llms.txt includes unsafe or private links that should not be advertised to agents."Probe sampled linked resources [warning]! Some sampled llms.txt links were broken, redirected unexpectedly, or did not return clearly agent-readable content.INFOProbe sampled linked resourcesINFOSelecting safe, useful links for bounded probing selectedCount=17PASSCheck probed links were attempted actual=17 expected="> 0"WARNCheck broken probed link count actual=1 expected=0PASSCheck agent-readable probed links actual=16 expected="> 0"WARNLinked resource probe validation completed with warnings reason="Some sampled llms.txt links were broken, redirected unexpectedly, or did not return clearly agent-readable content."Inspect optional llms-full.txt [informational]INFOInspect optional llms-full.txtINFOTrying to fetch /llms-full.txt url="https://foss.heptapod.net/llms-full.txt"PASS/llms-full.txt returned HTTP 2xx statusCode=200 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8" length=17609WARNCheck llms-full.txt content type is Markdown-compatible text actual="text/html; charset=utf-8" expected="text/markdown, text/x-markdown, text/plain, or another Markdown text type"PASSCheck llms-full.txt looks like supplemental full corpus content actual=true expected=truePASSOptional llms-full.txt inspection recorded
Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation
Agent Skills index
Agent Skills index has a validation warning at "Discover Agent Skills index".
13 Warning
Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation
Agent Skills index
Agent Skills index has a validation warning at "Discover Agent Skills index".
Needs attention
Agent Skills index
Issue
No Agent Skills discovery index was found at the canonical or legacy path.
Why it matters
An Agent Skills index lets agents discover task-specific instructions through a small trusted index, then verify and load only the skill artifacts they need.
Check name
Agent Skills index
Score
50/100
Status
warning
Category
Skill Discovery
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Publish an Agent Skills discovery index that advertises digest-pinned SKILL.md or archive artifacts.
Result
Agent Skills index has a validation warning at "Discover Agent Skills index".
Validation steps
Discover Agent Skills index
No Agent Skills discovery index was found at the canonical or legacy path.
Evidence log1 step · 5 lines
Discover Agent Skills index [warning]! No Agent Skills discovery index was found at the canonical or legacy path.INFODiscover Agent Skills indexINFOTry Agent Skills index paths in priority order paths=["/.well-known/agent-skills/index.json","/.well-known/skills/index.json"]WARNAgent Skills index candidate was not usable path="/.well-known/agent-skills/index.json" url="https://foss.heptapod.net/.well-known/agent-skills/index.json" statusCode=404WARNAgent Skills index candidate was not usable path="/.well-known/skills/index.json" url="https://foss.heptapod.net/.well-known/skills/index.json" statusCode=404WARNNo Agent Skills discovery index was found at the canonical or legacy path.Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation
DNS-AID Agent Discovery
DNS-AID Agent Discovery has a validation warning at "Query DNS-AID records".
13 Warning
Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation
DNS-AID Agent Discovery
DNS-AID Agent Discovery has a validation warning at "Query DNS-AID records".
Needs attention
DNS-AID Agent Discovery
Issue
No DNS-AID HTTPS/SVCB records were found under _agents.
Why it matters
DNS-AID lets agents discover index, A2A, and other agent entrypoints before fetching HTTP metadata. HTTPS/SVCB records provide the service-binding substrate, while DNSSEC can authenticate the discovery answer when available.
Check name
DNS-AID Agent Discovery
Score
50/100
Status
warning
Category
Skill Discovery
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Publish DNS-AID HTTPS/SVCB records under _agents for DNS-based agent entrypoint discovery.
Result
DNS-AID Agent Discovery has a validation warning at "Query DNS-AID records".
Validation steps
Query DNS-AID records
No DNS-AID HTTPS/SVCB records were found under _agents.
Check DNSSEC authentication evidence
DNSSEC authentication evidence was not visible for the DNS-AID labels or hostname.
Evidence log2 steps · 24 lines
Query DNS-AID records [warning]! No DNS-AID HTTPS/SVCB records were found under _agents.INFOQuery DNS-AID recordsINFOBuild DNS-AID query names from hostname hostname="foss.heptapod.net" labels=["_index._agents.foss.heptapod.net","_a2a._agents.foss.heptapod.net"] claimedOnPage=falseWARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_index._agents.foss.heptapod.net" rrtype="HTTPS" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" rcode=3 ad=false answerCount=0WARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_index._agents.foss.heptapod.net" rrtype="SVCB" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" rcode=3 ad=false answerCount=0WARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_index._agents.foss.heptapod.net" rrtype="ANY" resolver="node-resolveAny-fallback" answerCount=0 error="queryAny ETIMEOUT _index._agents.foss.heptapod.net"WARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_a2a._agents.foss.heptapod.net" rrtype="HTTPS" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" rcode=3 ad=false answerCount=0WARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_a2a._agents.foss.heptapod.net" rrtype="SVCB" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" rcode=3 ad=false answerCount=0WARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_a2a._agents.foss.heptapod.net" rrtype="ANY" resolver="node-resolveAny-fallback" answerCount=0 error="queryAny ETIMEOUT _a2a._agents.foss.heptapod.net"WARNCompare total DNS-AID answer count actual=0 expected="> 0"WARNNo DNS-AID HTTPS/SVCB records were found under _agents.Check DNSSEC authentication evidence [warning]! DNSSEC authentication evidence was not visible for the DNS-AID labels or hostname.INFOCheck DNSSEC authentication evidenceWARNCompare DNSSEC authenticated-data flag actual=false expected=trueWARNCompare visible DNSSEC material actual=false expected=trueWARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_index._agents.foss.heptapod.net" rrtype="HTTPS" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_index._agents.foss.heptapod.net" rrtype="SVCB" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_index._agents.foss.heptapod.net" rrtype="ANY" resolver="node-resolveAny-fallback" dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_a2a._agents.foss.heptapod.net" rrtype="HTTPS" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_a2a._agents.foss.heptapod.net" rrtype="SVCB" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_a2a._agents.foss.heptapod.net" rrtype="ANY" resolver="node-resolveAny-fallback" dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_index._agents.foss.heptapod.net" rrtype="DNSKEY" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_a2a._agents.foss.heptapod.net" rrtype="DNSKEY" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="foss.heptapod.net" rrtype="DNSKEY" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="heptapod.net" rrtype="DNSKEY" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNDNSSEC authentication evidence was not visible for the DNS-AID labels or hostname.
AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEmerging recommendation
ai.txt policy
ai.txt policy failed at "Validate transport".
12 Fail
AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEmerging recommendation
ai.txt policy
ai.txt policy failed at "Validate transport".
Needs attention
ai.txt policy
Issue
ai.txt appears to be an HTML page or error document rather than a plain-text policy.
Why it matters
ai.txt is a fragmented emerging convention. It can communicate human-readable AI crawling, training, attribution, restriction, and contact guidance, but it is not a standard access-control mechanism and absence should not be penalized.
Check name
ai.txt policy
Score
38/100
Status
fail
Category
Bot Access Control
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Publish an advisory human-readable AI usage policy only when the site intentionally needs one.
Result
ai.txt policy failed at "Validate transport".
Validation steps
Validate transport
ai.txt appears to be an HTML page or error document rather than a plain-text policy.
Parse ai.txt policy
Transport validation failed before policy parsing could be trusted.
Validate policy content
ai.txt does not follow the AI Visibility section model; treating it as non-standard advisory text.
Evidence log3 steps · 14 lines
Validate transport [fail]! ai.txt appears to be an HTML page or error document rather than a plain-text policy.INFOValidate transportINFOChecking ai.txt media type, size, line count, and whether the response looks like plain text contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8" length=15026 lineCount=222FAILCompare media type to preferred text/plain transport actual="text/html" expected="text/plain preferred; readable text required"FAILai.txt appears to be an HTML page or error document rather than a plain-text policy.Parse ai.txt policy [fail]! Transport validation failed before policy parsing could be trusted.INFOParse ai.txt policyINFODetecting ai.txt convention from bracket sections, frontmatter, headings, and ai.txt context linksINFODetected policy structure convention="unknown-text" sections=[] markdownHeadings=[]WARNCheck AI Visibility required sections actual="missing identity, permissions, restrictions" expected="identity, permissions, and restrictions" missingRecommended=["attribution","contact","content-types"]WARNTransport validation failed before policy parsing could be trusted.Validate policy content [warning]! ai.txt does not follow the AI Visibility section model; treating it as non-standard advisory text.INFOValidate policy contentINFOChecking required section content, permission/restriction language, attribution, contact details, and safety risks convention="unknown-text"INFODetected policy signals hasPermissionLanguage=false hasRestrictionLanguage=false hasTrainingLanguage=false hasAttributionLanguage=true hasContact=falseWARNCheck required and recommended section coverage actual={"missingRequired":["identity","permissions","restrictions"],"missingRecommended":["attribution","contact","content-types"]} expected={"missingRequired":[],"recommendedPresentWhenPossible":true}WARNai.txt does not follow the AI Visibility section model; treating it as non-standard advisory text.
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Content-Security-Policy
Content-Security-Policy has a validation warning at "Evaluate script execution".
11 Warning
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Content-Security-Policy
Content-Security-Policy has a validation warning at "Evaluate script execution".
Needs attention
Content-Security-Policy
Issue
script-src allows unsafe-eval.
Why it matters
Content Security Policy reduces the impact of injection bugs by limiting where scripts, styles, frames, forms, and other browser resources can load or execute.
Check name
Content-Security-Policy
Score
78/100
Status
warning
Category
Security & Trust
Maturity
Established
Goal
Constrain browser resource loading and script execution with an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.
Result
Content-Security-Policy has a validation warning at "Evaluate script execution".
Validation steps
Evaluate script execution
script-src allows unsafe-eval.
Review hardening directives
CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: base-uri.
Review CSP reporting
CSP does not define a reporting endpoint.
Evidence log3 steps · 12 lines
Evaluate script execution [warning]! script-src allows unsafe-eval.INFOEvaluate script executionINFOInspect effective script directive effectiveDirective="script-src" sources=["'self'","'unsafe-eval'","http://localhost:*","https://www.google.com/recaptcha/","https://www.recaptcha.net/","https://www.gstatic.com/recaptcha/","https://apis.google.com","'nonce-pKSTSy2WEwHCzoarOpRzvA=='"]WARNCompare script execution posture actual={"hasNonce":true,"hasHash":false,"hasStrictDynamic":false,"hasUnsafeInline":false,"hasUnsafeEval":true,"hasWildcardHost":false,"hasBroadScheme":false,"dangerousSchemes":[]} expected="constrained script sources without unsafe execution allowances" issue="script-src allows unsafe-eval."WARNscript-src allows unsafe-eval.Review hardening directives [warning]! CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: base-uri.INFOReview hardening directivesINFOInspect CSP hardening directives objectSrc=["'none'"] frameAncestors=["'self'"] formCount=0WARNCompare recommended hardening coverage actual=["base-uri"] expected="no missing object-src/base-uri/form-action requirements" issue="CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: base-uri."WARNCSP is missing recommended hardening directives: base-uri.Review CSP reporting [warning]! CSP does not define a reporting endpoint.INFOReview CSP reportingINFOInspect CSP reporting directives reportOnlyHeaderPresent=false reportOnlyDirectives=[]WARNCompare violation reporting configuration actual="no reporting endpoint" expected="report-to or report-uri present" issue="CSP does not define a reporting endpoint."WARNCSP does not define a reporting endpoint.
AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlInformational
Content Signal
Content Signal has a validation warning at "Validate declared usage preferences".
10 Warning
AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlInformational
Content Signal
Content Signal has a validation warning at "Validate declared usage preferences".
Needs attention
Content Signal
Issue
No Content-Usage or Content-Signal declarations were found.
Why it matters
Content usage preference signals communicate intended downstream AI use separately from robots.txt crawl permission. They can express training and search preferences for compliant systems without replacing access-control rules.
Check name
Content Signal
Score
50/100
Status
warning
Category
Bot Access Control
Maturity
Informational
Goal
Declare AI content usage preferences when the site intentionally publishes machine-readable usage policy.
Result
Content Signal has a validation warning at "Validate declared usage preferences".
Validation steps
Validate declared usage preferences
No Content-Usage or Content-Signal declarations were found.
Evidence log1 step · 5 lines
Validate declared usage preferences [warning]! No Content-Usage or Content-Signal declarations were found.INFOValidate declared usage preferencesINFOParsing declared preferences into terms and values recordCount=0SKIPSkipping declaration validation because no Content-Usage or Content-Signal records were declared.SKIPCompare declared records to validation requirement actual=0 expected="No validation needed when no records are declared"WARNNo Content-Usage or Content-Signal declarations were present.AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEmerging recommendation
RSL license signal
No RSL declarations were found.
10 Warning
AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEmerging recommendation
RSL license signal
No RSL declarations were found.
Needs attention
RSL license signal
Issue
No RSL declarations were found.
Why it matters
Really Simple Licensing is an emerging rights-expression layer for communicating content usage and licensing terms separately from robots.txt crawl permission.
Check name
RSL license signal
Score
50/100
Status
warning
Category
Bot Access Control
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Declare machine-readable content licensing terms for compliant AI and crawler systems when the site needs them.
Result
No RSL declarations were found.
Validation steps
Discover RSL declarations
No RSL declarations were found.
Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Discover RSL declarations [warning]! No RSL declarations were found.INFODiscover RSL declarationsINFOChecking robots.txt License records, HTTP Link rel=license headers, HTML license links, and inline RSL XML robotsFound=trueSKIPCount discovered RSL declarations actual=0 expected=">= 1 when RSL licensing terms are published" sources={}WARNNo RSL declarations were found on any supported discovery surface.AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEmerging recommendation
TDMRep declaration
No TDMRep declaration was found.
10 Warning
AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEmerging recommendation
TDMRep declaration
No TDMRep declaration was found.
Needs attention
TDMRep declaration
Issue
No TDMRep declaration was found at /.well-known/tdmrep.json.
Why it matters
TDMRep is a W3C Community Group protocol and IANA-registered well-known URI for declaring text and data mining reservation policy on applicable content.
Check name
TDMRep declaration
Score
50/100
Status
warning
Category
Bot Access Control
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Publish a machine-readable text and data mining reservation declaration and verifiable ODRL policy when the site needs one.
Result
No TDMRep declaration was found.
Validation steps
Fetch /.well-known/tdmrep.json
No TDMRep declaration was found at /.well-known/tdmrep.json.
Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Fetch /.well-known/tdmrep.json [warning]! No TDMRep declaration was found at /.well-known/tdmrep.json.INFOFetch /.well-known/tdmrep.jsonINFORequesting origin-level TDMRep declaration at /.well-known/tdmrep.jsonWARNCompare TDMRep file response actual=404 expected="2xx with JSON array when origin-level TDMRep is published" contentType="text/html" length=1593WARNNo TDMRep declaration was found at /.well-known/tdmrep.json. GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AEO: Answer-first passages
AEO: Answer-first passages scored 0/100 and needs a fix.
7 Fail
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AEO: Answer-first passages
AEO: Answer-first passages scored 0/100 and needs a fix.
Needs attention
AEO: Answer-first passages
Issue
1 section(s) bury or omit a concise opening answer. No direct definition pattern was detected.
Details
Why it matters
Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.
Check name
AEO: Answer-first passages
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.
Result
AEO: Answer-first passages scored 0/100 and needs a fix.
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
GEO: Source and trust signals
GEO: Source and trust signals scored 33/100 and needs a fix.
6 Fail
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
GEO: Source and trust signals
GEO: Source and trust signals scored 33/100 and needs a fix.
Needs attention
GEO: Source and trust signals
Issue
Missing source or trust signals: authorOrOwner, freshnessDate, sourceLinks, entityLinks.
Details
Why it matters
Generative answer systems work best with visible, self-contained, evidence-backed content, clear entities, trustworthy attribution, structured page sections, and crawler-accessible HTML. These signals improve machine understanding even though they do not guarantee AI citations.
Check name
GEO: Source and trust signals
Score
33/100
Status
fail
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content easy for AI answer engines to extract, cite, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.
Result
GEO: Source and trust signals scored 33/100 and needs a fix.
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
GEO: Citable passages
GEO: Citable passages scored 35/100 and needs a fix.
6 Fail
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
GEO: Citable passages
GEO: Citable passages scored 35/100 and needs a fix.
Needs attention
GEO: Citable passages
Issue
No evidence-backed, citation-length explanatory paragraph was found.
Details
Why it matters
Generative answer systems work best with visible, self-contained, evidence-backed content, clear entities, trustworthy attribution, structured page sections, and crawler-accessible HTML. These signals improve machine understanding even though they do not guarantee AI citations.
Check name
GEO: Citable passages
Score
35/100
Status
fail
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content easy for AI answer engines to extract, cite, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.
Result
GEO: Citable passages scored 35/100 and needs a fix.
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AEO: Extractable visible copy
AEO: Extractable visible copy scored 41/100 and needs a fix.
4 Fail
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AEO: Extractable visible copy
AEO: Extractable visible copy scored 41/100 and needs a fix.
Needs attention
AEO: Extractable visible copy
Issue
Only 92 visible words were detected for answer extraction. Client-rendering root signals were found with limited visible text. Visible text has few answer-oriented terms or explanatory markers.
Details
Why it matters
Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.
Check name
AEO: Extractable visible copy
Score
41/100
Status
fail
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.
Result
AEO: Extractable visible copy scored 41/100 and needs a fix.
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AEO: Evidence and trust
AEO: Evidence and trust scored 43/100 and needs a fix.
4 Fail
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AEO: Evidence and trust
AEO: Evidence and trust scored 43/100 and needs a fix.
Needs attention
AEO: Evidence and trust
Issue
Missing answer evidence or trust signals: author, publisher, freshnessDate, sameAs.
Details
Why it matters
Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.
Check name
AEO: Evidence and trust
Score
43/100
Status
fail
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.
Result
AEO: Evidence and trust scored 43/100 and needs a fix.
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
GEO: Extractable HTML
GEO: Extractable HTML scored 55/100 and needs improvement.
4 Warning
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
GEO: Extractable HTML
GEO: Extractable HTML scored 55/100 and needs improvement.
Needs attention
GEO: Extractable HTML
Issue
Only 92 visible words were found in the initial HTML. The page has client-rendering root signals and limited raw HTML text.
Details
Why it matters
Generative answer systems work best with visible, self-contained, evidence-backed content, clear entities, trustworthy attribution, structured page sections, and crawler-accessible HTML. These signals improve machine understanding even though they do not guarantee AI citations.
Check name
GEO: Extractable HTML
Score
55/100
Status
warning
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content easy for AI answer engines to extract, cite, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.
Result
GEO: Extractable HTML scored 55/100 and needs improvement.
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AIO: Source and trust signals
AIO: Source and trust signals scored 50/100 and needs improvement.
4 Warning
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AIO: Source and trust signals
AIO: Source and trust signals scored 50/100 and needs improvement.
Needs attention
AIO: Source and trust signals
Issue
Missing AIO trust signals: author, publisher, freshnessDate.
Details
Why it matters
Google AI Overviews and AI Mode depend on normal Google Search eligibility, snippet permissions, useful visible content, consistent structured data, trust signals, and page experience basics. These signals help Google understand and preview a page, but they do not guarantee selection.
Check name
AIO: Source and trust signals
Score
50/100
Status
warning
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content eligible, understandable, and previewable for Google Search AI features without promising inclusion.
Result
AIO: Source and trust signals scored 50/100 and needs improvement.
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
GEO: Structured extraction
GEO: Structured extraction scored 63/100 and needs improvement.
3 Warning
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
GEO: Structured extraction
GEO: Structured extraction scored 63/100 and needs improvement.
Needs attention
GEO: Structured extraction
Issue
Missing or weak extraction signals: summary or key takeaways, FAQ or question-answer section where appropriate, direct definition sentence.
Details
Why it matters
Generative answer systems work best with visible, self-contained, evidence-backed content, clear entities, trustworthy attribution, structured page sections, and crawler-accessible HTML. These signals improve machine understanding even though they do not guarantee AI citations.
Check name
GEO: Structured extraction
Score
63/100
Status
warning
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content easy for AI answer engines to extract, cite, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.
Result
GEO: Structured extraction scored 63/100 and needs improvement.
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AEO: Question and answer structure
AEO: Question and answer structure scored 55/100 and needs improvement.
3 Warning
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AEO: Question and answer structure
AEO: Question and answer structure scored 55/100 and needs improvement.
Needs attention
AEO: Question and answer structure
Issue
No natural question headings were detected. No visible FAQ or Q&A pattern was detected.
Details
Why it matters
Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.
Check name
AEO: Question and answer structure
Score
55/100
Status
warning
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.
Result
AEO: Question and answer structure scored 55/100 and needs improvement.
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AIO: Page experience proxy
AIO: Page experience proxy scored 70/100 and needs improvement.
2 Warning
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AIO: Page experience proxy
AIO: Page experience proxy scored 70/100 and needs improvement.
Needs attention
AIO: Page experience proxy
Issue
Only 92 words of visible rendered text were detected. 1 possible modal/interstitial element(s) detected.
Details
Why it matters
Google AI Overviews and AI Mode depend on normal Google Search eligibility, snippet permissions, useful visible content, consistent structured data, trust signals, and page experience basics. These signals help Google understand and preview a page, but they do not guarantee selection.
Check name
AIO: Page experience proxy
Score
70/100
Status
warning
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content eligible, understandable, and previewable for Google Search AI features without promising inclusion.
Result
AIO: Page experience proxy scored 70/100 and needs improvement.
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Semantic HTML
Semantic HTML is partially implemented.
2 Warning
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Semantic HTML
Semantic HTML is partially implemented.
Needs attention
Semantic HTML
Issue
Semantic HTML is missing or incomplete.
Why it matters
Semantic HTML gives browsers, assistive technology, search systems, and agents reliable landmarks, headings, controls, form semantics, and image context.
Check name
Semantic HTML
Score
91/100
Status
warning
Category
Content Readiness
Maturity
Established
Goal
Expose readable page structure through semantic HTML and accessible controls.
Result
Semantic HTML is partially implemented.
Validation steps
Page landmarks
The page has a main landmark but is missing a primary navigation, header/banner, or page-level footer/contentinfo landmark.
Evidence log1 step · 3 lines
Page landmarks [warning]! The page has a main landmark but is missing a primary navigation, header/banner, or page-level footer/contentinfo landmark.INFOPage landmarksWARNCheck page landmarks evidence actual={"counts":{"main":1,"roleMain":0,"nav":2,"roleNavigation":0,"header":1,"roleBanner":0,"footer":0,"pageFooter":0,"roleContentinfo":0},"main":true} expected="semantic HTML evidence for this step"WARNPage landmarks has a warning issue="The page has a main landmark but is missing a primary navigation, header/banner, or page-level footer/contentinfo landmark."GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AEO: Entity and definition clarity
AEO: Entity and definition clarity scored 80/100 and needs improvement.
1 Warning
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AEO: Entity and definition clarity
AEO: Entity and definition clarity scored 80/100 and needs improvement.
Needs attention
AEO: Entity and definition clarity
Issue
No direct definition sentence was detected.
Details
Why it matters
Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.
Check name
AEO: Entity and definition clarity
Score
80/100
Status
warning
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.
Result
AEO: Entity and definition clarity scored 80/100 and needs improvement.
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AIO: Visible content clarity
AIO: Visible content clarity scored 82/100 and needs improvement.
1 Warning
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AIO: Visible content clarity
AIO: Visible content clarity scored 82/100 and needs improvement.
Needs attention
AIO: Visible content clarity
Issue
Only 92 visible words were detected. 1 section(s) may benefit from clearer answer-first openings.
Details
Why it matters
Google AI Overviews and AI Mode depend on normal Google Search eligibility, snippet permissions, useful visible content, consistent structured data, trust signals, and page experience basics. These signals help Google understand and preview a page, but they do not guarantee selection.
Check name
AIO: Visible content clarity
Score
82/100
Status
warning
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content eligible, understandable, and previewable for Google Search AI features without promising inclusion.
Result
AIO: Visible content clarity scored 82/100 and needs improvement.
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AIO: Google Search eligibility
AIO: Google Search eligibility scored 85/100 and needs improvement.
1 Warning
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AIO: Google Search eligibility
AIO: Google Search eligibility scored 85/100 and needs improvement.
Needs attention
AIO: Google Search eligibility
Issue
Canonical does not self-reference the scanned page.
Details
Why it matters
Google AI Overviews and AI Mode depend on normal Google Search eligibility, snippet permissions, useful visible content, consistent structured data, trust signals, and page experience basics. These signals help Google understand and preview a page, but they do not guarantee selection.
Check name
AIO: Google Search eligibility
Score
85/100
Status
warning
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content eligible, understandable, and previewable for Google Search AI features without promising inclusion.
Result
AIO: Google Search eligibility scored 85/100 and needs improvement.
AI DiscoverabilityDiscoverabilityEstablished
IndexNow key
IndexNow key is informational for this page.
Informational
AI DiscoverabilityDiscoverabilityEstablished
IndexNow key
IndexNow key is informational for this page.
Needs attention
IndexNow key
Issue
IndexNow key is informational for this page.
Why it matters
IndexNow lets sites notify participating search engines about changed URLs, but ownership verification requires a UTF-8 key file whose filename matches the key.
Check name
IndexNow key
Score
100/100
Status
informational
Category
Discoverability
Maturity
Established
Goal
Verify that IndexNow ownership key placement is detectable when the site advertises it.
Result
IndexNow key is informational for this page.
Validation steps
Find advertised IndexNow key location
No IndexNow key location was advertised in HTML, Link headers, or robots.txt.
Fetch and validate IndexNow key file
No discoverable IndexNow key file was found.
Evidence log2 steps · 10 lines
Find advertised IndexNow key location [informational]! No IndexNow key location was advertised in HTML, Link headers, or robots.txt.INFOFind advertised IndexNow key locationINFOLook for IndexNow key hints in HTML, Link headers, and robots.txt supportedHints=["robots.txt IndexNow-Key","rel=indexnow-key","meta name=indexnow-key-location"]PASSCompare advertised key location count actual=0 expected="> 0"WARNNo IndexNow key location was advertised in HTML, Link headers, or robots.txt.Fetch and validate IndexNow key file [informational]! No discoverable IndexNow key file was found.INFOFetch and validate IndexNow key fileINFOLook for IndexNow key hints in HTML, Link headers, and robots.txt supportedHints=["robots.txt IndexNow-Key","rel=indexnow-key","meta name=indexnow-key-location"]PASSCompare advertised key location count actual=0 expected="> 0"INFOFetch each advertised same-origin key file and validate filename/body matchFAILCompare valid IndexNow key file count actual=0 expected="> 0"WARNNo discoverable IndexNow key file was found.
Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit
Use efficient cache lifetimes
33 Fail
Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit
Use efficient cache lifetimes
Check name
Use efficient cache lifetimes
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Device
desktop
Category
Performance
Estimated savings
Est savings of 189 KiB
Fix guidance
A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page. [Learn more about caching](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/cache).
References
https://web.dev/learn/performance/Evidence
{
"description": "A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page. [Learn more about caching](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/cache).",
"displayValue": "Est savings of 189 KiB"
}Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit
Improve image delivery
17 Warning
Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit
Improve image delivery
Check name
Improve image delivery
Score
50/100
Status
warning
Device
desktop
Category
Performance
Estimated savings
Est savings of 21 KiB
Fix guidance
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. [Learn more about optimizing image size](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/image-delivery)
References
https://web.dev/learn/performance/Evidence
{
"description": "Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. [Learn more about optimizing image size](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/image-delivery)",
"displayValue": "Est savings of 21 KiB"
}Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit
Render-blocking requests
17 Warning
Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit
Render-blocking requests
Check name
Render-blocking requests
Score
50/100
Status
warning
Device
desktop
Category
Performance
Fix guidance
Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. [Deferring or inlining](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/render-blocking) can move these network requests out of the critical path.
References
https://web.dev/learn/performance/Evidence
{
"description": "Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. [Deferring or inlining](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/render-blocking) can move these network requests out of the critical path."
}Fix with MCP or CLI
Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.
Score history
Public scan score over time
Public reports for this website origin. Select any point or report link to open that canonical report.
| Scan date | Score | Readiness | Report |
|---|---|---|---|
| 55/100 | Level 3, Bot-Aware | Current report |