Export Report
OVERALL SCORE
Level 3, Bot-Aware
- AI Discoverability 68 out of 100
- Agent Ease of Use 59 out of 100
- Security & Trust 78 out of 100
- GEO, AIO and AEO 63 out of 100
- SEO 92 out of 100
- Performance and Accessibility 72 out of 100
What AI sees of your website
Knock | Customer engagement infrastructure
Knock is customer engagement infrastructure for your product, marketing, and transactional messaging. Activate your data, ship cross-channel messaging, and accelerate growth.
Next step
Turn this report into a fix workflow
6 failed checks are ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.
| Metric | Score | Status | Passed | Failed | Warning | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI Discoverability | 68 | Needs work | 33 | 6 | 8 | View details |
| Discoverability | 82 | Mostly ready | 9 | 1 | 0 | View details |
| Content Readiness | 82 | Mostly ready | 23 | 4 | 5 | View details |
| Bot Access Control | 45 | Priority fix | 1 | 1 | 3 | View details |
| Agent Ease of Use | 59 | Needs work | 10 | 1 | 20 | View details |
| API | 74 | Needs work | 6 | 0 | 4 | |
| Auth | 50 | Needs work | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| MCP | 60 | Needs work | 2 | 0 | 6 | |
| Skill Discovery | 51 | Needs work | 2 | 1 | 7 | View details |
| GEO, AIO and AEO | 63 | Needs work | 8 | 2 | 8 | View details |
| GEO Readiness | 52 | Needs work | 2 | 1 | 3 | View details |
| AIO Readiness | 85 | Mostly ready | 4 | 0 | 2 | |
| AEO Readiness | 51 | Needs work | 2 | 1 | 3 | View details |
| SEO | 92 | Strong | 9 | 1 | 0 | View details |
| SEO | 92 | Strong | 9 | 1 | 0 | View details |
| Security & Trust | 78 | Mostly ready | 18 | 2 | 4 | View details |
| Security & Trust | 78 | Mostly ready | 18 | 2 | 4 | View details |
| Performance and Accessibility | 72 | Needs work | 19 | 5 | 2 | View details |
| Performance | 64 | Needs work | 15 | 3 | 2 | View details |
| Accessibility | 86 | Mostly ready | 4 | 2 | 0 | View details |
Prioritized recommendations
Issues ranked by score impact
45 items need attention
AI DiscoverabilityDiscoverabilityEstablished
Link headers
Link headers failed at "Fetch same-origin Link header targets".
55 Fail
AI DiscoverabilityDiscoverabilityEstablished
Link headers
Link headers failed at "Fetch same-origin Link header targets".
Needs attention
Link headers
Issue
Link headers did not expose any same-origin targets to validate.
Why it matters
Link headers let automated clients discover API catalogs, documentation, and machine-readable alternates without parsing page markup first.
Check name
Link headers
Score
45/100
Status
fail
Category
Discoverability
Maturity
Established
Goal
Include Link response headers for agent discovery using RFC 8288.
Result
Link headers failed at "Fetch same-origin Link header targets".
Validation steps
Fetch same-origin Link header targets
Link headers did not expose any same-origin targets to validate.
Evidence log1 step · 7 lines
Fetch same-origin Link header targets [fail]! Link headers did not expose any same-origin targets to validate.INFOFetch same-origin Link header targetsINFOFetch same-origin Link header targets and record external skipsSKIPSkipped Link target fetch rel="service-doc" url="https://docs.knock.app" reason="External Link target was not fetched."SKIPSkipped Link target fetch rel="service-doc" url="https://docs.knock.app/mapi-reference" reason="External Link target was not fetched."SKIPSkipped Link target fetch rel="service-doc" url="https://docs.knock.app/api-reference" reason="External Link target was not fetched."FAILCompare same-origin Link target failures actual=1 expected=0FAILLink headers did not expose any same-origin targets to validate.Agent Ease of UseMCPEmerging recommendation
WebMCP
WebMCP has a validation warning at "Probe WebMCP operability".
25 Warning
Agent Ease of UseMCPEmerging recommendation
WebMCP
WebMCP has a validation warning at "Probe WebMCP operability".
Needs attention
WebMCP
Issue
No WebMCP surface was found to probe.
Details
Why it matters
WebMCP gives agents structured page and browser tool hints so they can understand actions without relying only on screen scraping.
Check name
WebMCP
Score
50/100
Status
warning
Category
MCP
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Expose browser/page WebMCP tools and compatible static WebMCP metadata when a site wants agents to understand in-page actions.
Result
WebMCP has a validation warning at "Probe WebMCP operability".
Validation steps
Detect WebMCP runtime API
Expose current WebMCP tools through document.modelContext.registerTool(), or clearly document navigator.modelContext as a compatibility/polyfill profile.
Probe WebMCP operability
No WebMCP surface was found to probe.
WebMCP operability findings
- No WebMCP surface was found to probe.
- Conventional WebMCP manifest paths were checked but did not return a valid manifest.
Validate declarative WebMCP form tools
No W3C-style declarative WebMCP form attributes were found.
Validate MCP-aware HTML annotations
No data-mcp-tool or hyphenated WebMCP compatibility annotations were found.
Validate static WebMCP JSON compatibility
No static WebMCP JSON manifest or WMCP interaction graph was found.
Validate WebMCP tool metadata quality
Use clear tool names, useful descriptions, constrained schemas, side-effect clarity, and profile-appropriate naming.
Review WebMCP security and policy signals
Remove secrets and prompt-injection text from WebMCP metadata, avoid private endpoints, and use Permissions-Policy and annotations for tool safety.
Evidence log7 steps · 32 lines
Detect WebMCP runtime API [informational]INFODetect WebMCP runtime API status="informational"INFOProbe rendered browser for WebMCP runtime objects SKIPCheck current W3C runtime API actual="not detected" expected="document.modelContext/registerTool available"INFOWebMCP evidence was recorded for context. status="informational"Probe WebMCP operability [warning]! No WebMCP surface was found to probe.INFOProbe WebMCP operability status="warning"INFORun safe WebMCP operability checks safeProbeOnly=trueWARNCheck usable WebMCP evidence actual=0 expected="at least 1 usable runtime, declarative, annotation, or static manifest signal"WARNWebMCP operability warning warning="No WebMCP surface was found to probe."WARNWebMCP operability warning warning="Conventional WebMCP manifest paths were checked but did not return a valid manifest."WARNNo WebMCP surface was found to probe.Validate declarative WebMCP form tools [informational]! No W3C-style declarative WebMCP form attributes were found.INFOValidate declarative WebMCP form tools status="informational"INFOInspect visible forms and controls for current declarative WebMCP attributes annotatedElements=0 formsWithAttributes=0 controlsWithAttributes=0SKIPValidate declarative WebMCP attribute quality actual=0 expected=0INFONo W3C-style declarative WebMCP form attributes were found. status="informational"Validate MCP-aware HTML annotations [informational]! No data-mcp-tool or hyphenated WebMCP compatibility annotations were found.INFOValidate MCP-aware HTML annotations status="informational"INFOInspect HTML for MCP compatibility annotations compatibilityAttributeCount=0 dataMcpToolCount=0 examples=[]SKIPValidate compatibility annotation quality actual=0 expected=0INFONo data-mcp-tool or hyphenated WebMCP compatibility annotations were found. status="informational"Validate static WebMCP JSON compatibility [warning]! No static WebMCP JSON manifest or WMCP interaction graph was found.INFOValidate static WebMCP JSON compatibility status="warning"INFODiscover static WebMCP manifest candidates conventionalPaths=["/.well-known/webmcp.json","/webmcp.json"] checkedCount=2 profileCounts={}INFOWebMCP manifest candidate checked source="path" path="/.well-known/webmcp.json" url="https://knock.app/.well-known/webmcp.json" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8"INFOWebMCP manifest candidate checked source="path" path="/webmcp.json" url="https://knock.app/webmcp.json" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8"WARNValidate discovered static WebMCP metadata actual={"validManifestCount":0,"invalidManifestCount":0,"toolCount":0,"wmcpActionCount":0} expected="at least 1 valid tools[] manifest or WMCP graph when static metadata is present"WARNNo static WebMCP JSON manifest or WMCP interaction graph was found.Validate WebMCP tool metadata quality [informational]INFOValidate WebMCP tool metadata quality status="informational"INFOInspect WebMCP tool names, descriptions, schemas, and safety hints toolCount=0SKIPCheck tool metadata findings actual={"issueCount":0,"warningCount":0} expected="0 issues and 0 warnings"INFOWebMCP evidence was recorded for context. status="informational"Review WebMCP security and policy signals [informational]INFOReview WebMCP security and policy signals status="informational"INFOInspect WebMCP security and policy signals permissionsPolicy="(missing)" failureCount=0 warningCount=0PASSCheck security findings actual={"failures":0,"warnings":0} expected="0 failures and 0 warnings"INFOWebMCP evidence was recorded for context. status="informational"
AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEstablished
AI bot rules in robots.txt
AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".
17 Fail
AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEstablished
AI bot rules in robots.txt
AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".
Needs attention
AI bot rules in robots.txt
Issue
No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.
Why it matters
AI crawler product tokens have different meanings. Explicit robots.txt groups make training, search, and retrieval access policy auditable for compliant crawler operators.
Check name
AI bot rules in robots.txt
Score
31/100
Status
fail
Category
Bot Access Control
Maturity
Established
Goal
Declare deliberate robots.txt rules for major AI training, AI search, user-triggered, and dataset crawlers.
Result
AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".
Validation steps
Classify AI crawler rules
No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.
Evidence log1 step · 6 lines
Classify AI crawler rules [fail]! No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.INFOClassify AI crawler rulesINFOParsing User-agent groups and Allow/Disallow records for known AI crawler tokens evaluatedPath="/"INFOEvaluating exact User-agent matches before wildcard fallback exactAiPolicyCount=0 totalCrawlerTokens=18FAILNo explicit AI crawler User-agent groups were found examplesExpected=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ClaudeBot","Google-Extended","CCBot"]FAILCompare explicit AI crawler coverage actual=0 expected="> 0 explicit non-search AI crawler policies" missingTokens=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ChatGPT-User","ClaudeBot","Claude-SearchBot","Claude-User","Google-Extended","Applebot-Extended","Amazonbot","Amzn-SearchBot","Amzn-User","PerplexityBot"]INFOResolved effective root-path policy for crawler tokens blocked=0 allowed=21 unspecified=0Agent Ease of UseAuthEmerging recommendation
Auth.md Agent Registration
Auth.md Agent Registration has a validation warning at "Warn when auth surface lacks Auth.md".
17 Warning
Agent Ease of UseAuthEmerging recommendation
Auth.md Agent Registration
Auth.md Agent Registration has a validation warning at "Warn when auth surface lacks Auth.md".
Needs attention
Auth.md Agent Registration
Issue
The site appears to support login, signup, account access, or credentials but does not publish /auth.md.
Why it matters
Human login and signup flows are often opaque to agents. Auth.md gives automated clients a stable registration contract instead of forcing them to scrape docs, automate browser forms, or guess credential flows.
Check name
Auth.md Agent Registration
Score
50/100
Status
warning
Category
Auth
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Publish Auth.md v1 metadata so agents can discover how to register, claim a user, and obtain credentials.
Result
Auth.md Agent Registration has a validation warning at "Warn when auth surface lacks Auth.md".
Validation steps
Warn when auth surface lacks Auth.md
The site appears to support login, signup, account access, or credentials but does not publish /auth.md.
Evidence log1 step · 2 lines
Warn when auth surface lacks Auth.md [warning]! The site appears to support login, signup, account access, or credentials but does not publish /auth.md.INFOWarn when auth surface lacks Auth.mdWARNThe site appears to support login, signup, account access, or credentials but does not publish /auth.md.Agent Ease of UseAuthEstablished
OAuth / OIDC discovery
OAuth / OIDC discovery has a validation warning at "Detect OAuth/OIDC applicability".
17 Warning
Agent Ease of UseAuthEstablished
OAuth / OIDC discovery
OAuth / OIDC discovery has a validation warning at "Detect OAuth/OIDC applicability".
Needs attention
OAuth / OIDC discovery
Issue
Generic authentication signals were found, but no OAuth/OIDC discovery signal was detected.
Why it matters
OAuth and OIDC discovery let agents and API clients find authorization, token, and key endpoints programmatically instead of scraping login pages or guessing provider setup.
Check name
OAuth / OIDC discovery
Score
50/100
Status
warning
Category
Auth
Maturity
Established
Goal
Publish OAuth/OIDC discovery metadata only when the site operates or advertises a real OAuth/OIDC authorization server.
Result
OAuth / OIDC discovery has a validation warning at "Detect OAuth/OIDC applicability".
Validation steps
Detect OAuth/OIDC applicability
Generic authentication signals were found, but no OAuth/OIDC discovery signal was detected.
Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Detect OAuth/OIDC applicability [warning]! Generic authentication signals were found, but no OAuth/OIDC discovery signal was detected.INFODetect OAuth/OIDC applicabilityINFOInspecting homepage, headers, and known auth/API signals for OAuth or OIDC claims applies=false signalsCount=0 genericAuthSignalsCount=3 checkedCount=2WARNCheck OAuth/OIDC applicability signal actual=false expected="true when metadata exists or OAuth/OIDC is claimed" checked=[{"path":"/.well-known/openid-configuration","statusCode":404,"contentType":"text/html; charset=utf-8","length":58650},{"path":"/.well-known/oauth-authorization-server","statusCode":404,"contentType":"text/html; charset=utf-8","length":58650}]WARNDetect OAuth/OIDC applicability completed with warnings issue="Generic authentication signals were found, but no OAuth/OIDC discovery signal was detected."Agent Ease of UseAuthEmerging recommendation
OAuth Protected Resource
OAuth Protected Resource has a validation warning at "Detect protected-resource applicability".
17 Warning
Agent Ease of UseAuthEmerging recommendation
OAuth Protected Resource
OAuth Protected Resource has a validation warning at "Detect protected-resource applicability".
Needs attention
OAuth Protected Resource
Issue
Generic authentication signals were found, but no OAuth Protected Resource metadata signal was detected.
Why it matters
Protected-resource metadata tells agents which API/resource is locked, which authorization servers can issue tokens for it, and how a 401 challenge maps back to the correct resource.
Check name
OAuth Protected Resource
Score
50/100
Status
warning
Category
Auth
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Publish OAuth Protected Resource Metadata for OAuth-protected APIs and MCP resources so clients can identify the resource and its authorization servers.
Result
OAuth Protected Resource has a validation warning at "Detect protected-resource applicability".
Validation steps
Detect protected-resource applicability
Generic authentication signals were found, but no OAuth Protected Resource metadata signal was detected.
Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Detect protected-resource applicability [warning]! Generic authentication signals were found, but no OAuth Protected Resource metadata signal was detected.INFODetect protected-resource applicabilityINFOInspecting auth headers, MCP/OAuth claims, and protected-resource hints applies=false requiresAuthorizationServers=false signalsCount=0 genericAuthSignalsCount=3 checkedCount=1WARNCheck protected-resource metadata applicability actual=false expected="true when RFC 9728 metadata exists or support is claimed" checked=[{"url":"https://knock.app/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource","path":"/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource","source":"root-well-known","resourceIdentifier":"https://knock.app","statusCode":404,"contentType":"text/html; charset=utf-8","length":58650}]WARNDetect protected-resource applicability completed with warnings issue="Generic authentication signals were found, but no OAuth Protected Resource metadata signal was detected."Agent Ease of UseAPIEstablished
OpenAPI discovery
OpenAPI discovery has a validation warning at "Discover OpenAPI document".
17 Warning
Agent Ease of UseAPIEstablished
OpenAPI discovery
OpenAPI discovery has a validation warning at "Discover OpenAPI document".
Needs attention
OpenAPI discovery
Issue
The site appears to publish or document a public API, but no OpenAPI or Swagger document was found.
Why it matters
OpenAPI documents let agents understand operations, schemas, authentication, servers, and request/response formats before calling an API.
Check name
OpenAPI discovery
Score
67/100
Status
warning
Category
API
Maturity
Established
Goal
Publish a valid OpenAPI or Swagger document for public API discovery when this origin exposes public APIs.
Result
OpenAPI discovery has a validation warning at "Discover OpenAPI document".
Validation steps
Discover OpenAPI document
The site appears to publish or document a public API, but no OpenAPI or Swagger document was found.
Evidence log1 step · 16 lines
Discover OpenAPI document [warning]! The site appears to publish or document a public API, but no OpenAPI or Swagger document was found.INFODiscover OpenAPI document status="warning"INFOBuild OpenAPI candidate list conventionalPaths=19 candidateCount=19 sources={"conventional-path":19}INFOFetch OpenAPI candidate path="/openapi.json" source="conventional-path" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8"INFOFetch OpenAPI candidate path="/openapi.yaml" source="conventional-path" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8"INFOFetch OpenAPI candidate path="/swagger.json" source="conventional-path" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8"INFOFetch OpenAPI candidate path="/swagger.yaml" source="conventional-path" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8"INFOFetch OpenAPI candidate path="/api/openapi.json" source="conventional-path" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8"INFOFetch OpenAPI candidate path="/api/openapi.yaml" source="conventional-path" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8"INFOFetch OpenAPI candidate path="/api/swagger.json" source="conventional-path" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8"INFOFetch OpenAPI candidate path="/api/swagger.yaml" source="conventional-path" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8"INFOFetch OpenAPI candidate path="/docs/openapi.json" source="conventional-path" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8"INFOFetch OpenAPI candidate path="/docs/openapi.yaml" source="conventional-path" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8"INFOFetch OpenAPI candidate path="/api-docs" source="conventional-path" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8"INFOFetch OpenAPI candidate path="/v3/api-docs" source="conventional-path" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8"WARNSelect a usable OpenAPI candidate actual="none" expected="same-origin candidate with a parseable OpenAPI or Swagger document"WARNThe site appears to publish or document a public API, but no OpenAPI or Swagger document was found.Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Referrer-Policy
Referrer-Policy failed at "Find Referrer-Policy header".
15 Fail
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Referrer-Policy
Referrer-Policy failed at "Find Referrer-Policy header".
Needs attention
Referrer-Policy
Issue
Referrer-Policy header is missing.
Why it matters
Referrer-Policy controls how much URL context is sent to other origins, limiting accidental leakage of paths, queries, and identifiers.
Check name
Referrer-Policy
Score
40/100
Status
fail
Category
Security & Trust
Maturity
Established
Goal
Limit how much referrer data leaves the site with an explicit Referrer-Policy header.
Result
Referrer-Policy failed at "Find Referrer-Policy header".
Validation steps
Find Referrer-Policy header
Referrer-Policy header is missing.
Review observed browser responses
One or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit Referrer-Policy.
Evidence log2 steps · 8 lines
Find Referrer-Policy header [fail]! Referrer-Policy header is missing.INFOFind Referrer-Policy headerINFORead Referrer-Policy delivery header="referrer-policy" value="missing" metaReferrerPolicyCount=0 browserDefault="strict-origin-when-cross-origin"FAILRequire explicit HTTP Referrer-Policy header actual="missing" expected="HTTP response header present" issue="Referrer-Policy header is missing."FAILReferrer-Policy header is missing.Review observed browser responses [warning]! One or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit Referrer-Policy.INFOReview observed browser responsesINFOSample Chrome-observed same-origin responses observedResponseCount=68 sameOriginCount=63 htmlDocumentCount=1WARNCompare observed Referrer-Policy coverage actual={"missingPolicyCount":1,"unsafeOrInvalidPolicyCount":0,"weakPolicyCount":0,"affected":[{"url":"https://knock.app/","status":200,"resourceType":"document","contentType":"text/html; charset=utf-8","referrerPolicy":null,"classification":"invalid"}]} expected="0 missing, unsafe, invalid, or weak same-origin HTML responses" issue="One or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit Referrer-Policy."WARNOne or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit Referrer-Policy.
Agent Ease of UseMCPEmerging recommendation
MCP Server Card
MCP Server Card has a validation warning at "Discover MCP server card".
15 Warning
Agent Ease of UseMCPEmerging recommendation
MCP Server Card
MCP Server Card has a validation warning at "Discover MCP server card".
Needs attention
MCP Server Card
Issue
The MCP server card was found only at a transitional or linked path.
Why it matters
MCP server cards give agents a stable, public pre-connection discovery surface for server identity, remote transports, protocol compatibility, and safe routing without guessing endpoints.
Check name
MCP Server Card
Score
70/100
Status
warning
Category
MCP
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Publish an MCP Server Card that helps agents discover remote MCP server transports before opening a session.
Result
MCP Server Card has a validation warning at "Discover MCP server card".
Validation steps
Discover MCP server card
The MCP server card was found only at a transitional or linked path.
Validate MCP remotes
At least one MCP remote is cross-origin and was not actively probed by this scanner.
Validate HTTP delivery
CORS header Access-Control-Allow-Origin is absent.
Probe same-origin MCP endpoint
MCP remotes were discovered, but none could be safely probed by this scanner.
Evidence log4 steps · 32 lines
Discover MCP server card [warning]! The MCP server card was found only at a transitional or linked path.INFODiscover MCP server card candidateCount=5INFOBuild MCP server-card candidate list currentPath="/.well-known/mcp-server-card" transitionalPaths=["/.well-known/mcp/server-card.json","/.well-known/mcp/server-cards.json","/mcp.json","/.well-known/mcp.json"] linkedPaths=["/.well-known/mcp/server-card.json"]INFOTrying to fetch /.well-known/mcp-server-card url="https://knock.app/.well-known/mcp-server-card" source="current"FAIL/.well-known/mcp-server-card did not return a usable server card statusCode=404 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8"INFOTrying to fetch /.well-known/mcp/server-card.json url="https://knock.app/.well-known/mcp/server-card.json" source="transitional"PASS/.well-known/mcp/server-card.json returned a successful response statusCode=200 contentType="application/json" finalUrl="https://knock.app/.well-known/mcp/server-card.json"INFOTrying to fetch /.well-known/mcp/server-cards.json url="https://knock.app/.well-known/mcp/server-cards.json" source="transitional"FAIL/.well-known/mcp/server-cards.json did not return a usable server card statusCode=404 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8"INFOTrying to fetch /mcp.json url="https://knock.app/mcp.json" source="transitional"FAIL/mcp.json did not return a usable server card statusCode=404 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8"INFOTrying to fetch /.well-known/mcp.json url="https://knock.app/.well-known/mcp.json" source="transitional"FAIL/.well-known/mcp.json did not return a usable server card statusCode=404 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8"WARNCheck selected card is published at the current well-known path actual="/.well-known/mcp/server-card.json" expected="/.well-known/mcp-server-card" source="transitional" finalUrl="https://knock.app/.well-known/mcp/server-card.json"WARNMCP server card was discovered through a transitional or linked path path="/.well-known/mcp/server-card.json" source="transitional" reason="The MCP server card was found only at a transitional or linked path."Validate MCP remotes [warning]! At least one MCP remote is cross-origin and was not actively probed by this scanner.INFOValidate MCP remotes remoteCount=1PASSCheck at least one MCP remote is declared actual=1 expected="> 0"PASSCheck invalid remote count actual=0 expected=0 invalidRemotes=[]WARNCheck same-origin remote coverage actual=0 expected=1PASSRemote #0 is syntactically usable index=0 source="remotes" type="streamable-http" url="https://mcp.knock.app/mcp" sameOrigin=false supportedProtocolVersions=["2025-03-26","2025-06-18"] authRequired=false issues=[]WARNMCP remotes are valid but not all can be actively probed reason="At least one MCP remote is cross-origin and was not actively probed by this scanner."Validate HTTP delivery [warning]! CORS header Access-Control-Allow-Origin is absent.INFOValidate HTTP delivery finalUrl="https://knock.app/.well-known/mcp/server-card.json"PASSCheck server card returned HTTP 2xx actual=200 expected="200-299"PASSCheck card is served as JSON actual="application/json" expected="application/json or +json"PASSCheck card is served over HTTPS actual="https:" expected="https:"WARNCheck browser-readable CORS header actual="missing" expected="Access-Control-Allow-Origin present"PASSCheck cache header is present actual="public, max-age=3600" expected="Cache-Control present"WARNMCP server-card HTTP delivery has non-blocking issues issues=["CORS header Access-Control-Allow-Origin is absent."] reason="CORS header Access-Control-Allow-Origin is absent."Probe same-origin MCP endpoint [warning]! MCP remotes were discovered, but none could be safely probed by this scanner.INFOProbe same-origin MCP endpoint probeCount=1INFOSelecting same-origin unauthenticated MCP remotes for a bounded initialize probeSKIPSkipped MCP endpoint probe url="https://mcp.knock.app/mcp" reason="Cross-origin MCP remote was validated syntactically but not actively probed."WARNCheck successful initialize probe count actual=0 expected="> 0 when a safe same-origin unauthenticated remote exists" activeProbeCount=0 authBlocked=0WARNMCP endpoint probe could not fully confirm operability reason="MCP remotes were discovered, but none could be safely probed by this scanner."
Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation
A2A Agent Card
A2A Agent Card has a validation warning at "Discover A2A Agent Card".
13 Warning
Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation
A2A Agent Card
A2A Agent Card has a validation warning at "Discover A2A Agent Card".
Needs attention
A2A Agent Card
Issue
No A2A Agent Card was found at the current, legacy, or fallback discovery paths.
Why it matters
A2A Agent Cards provide protocol-specific discovery for agent identity, skills, input and output modes, transport bindings, capabilities, and security requirements. Legacy A2A also used /.well-known/agent.json, so scanners must classify the card shape before reporting readiness.
Check name
A2A Agent Card
Score
50/100
Status
warning
Category
Skill Discovery
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Publish a version-appropriate A2A Agent Card so A2A-compatible clients can discover agent skills and invoke the declared endpoint safely.
Result
A2A Agent Card has a validation warning at "Discover A2A Agent Card".
Validation steps
Discover A2A Agent Card
No A2A Agent Card was found at the current, legacy, or fallback discovery paths.
Evidence log1 step · 8 lines
Discover A2A Agent Card [warning]! No A2A Agent Card was found at the current, legacy, or fallback discovery paths.INFODiscover A2A Agent CardINFOTry A2A discovery paths in priority order paths=["/.well-known/agent-card.json","/.well-known/agent.json","/agent-card.json","/.well-known/a2a/agent-card.json"]WARNA2A candidate path did not return a usable card path="/.well-known/agent-card.json" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8"WARNA2A candidate path did not return a usable card path="/.well-known/agent.json" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8"WARNA2A candidate path did not return a usable card path="/agent-card.json" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8"WARNA2A candidate path did not return a usable card path="/.well-known/a2a/agent-card.json" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8"WARNNo A2A Agent Card candidate was selectedWARNNo A2A Agent Card was found at the current, legacy, or fallback discovery paths.Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation
agents.json
agents.json has a validation warning at "Discover agents.json".
13 Warning
Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation
agents.json
agents.json has a validation warning at "Discover agents.json".
Needs attention
agents.json
Issue
No Wildcard-style agents.json file was found.
Why it matters
Wildcard agents.json gives agents workflow-level context beyond plain OpenAPI, including flows, links, examples, and API action structure. It is an emerging OpenAPI-adjacent proposal, so scanners should validate the contract shape without treating it as an A2A or IETF standard.
Check name
agents.json
Score
50/100
Status
warning
Category
Skill Discovery
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Publish a Wildcard-style agents.json file so agents can discover OpenAPI-backed workflows, links, examples, and authentication requirements.
Result
agents.json has a validation warning at "Discover agents.json".
Validation steps
Discover agents.json
No Wildcard-style agents.json file was found.
Evidence log1 step · 6 lines
Discover agents.json [warning]! No Wildcard-style agents.json file was found.INFODiscover agents.jsonINFOTry agents.json discovery paths in priority order paths=["/.well-known/agents.json","/agents.json"]WARNagents.json candidate path did not return a usable contract path="/.well-known/agents.json" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8"WARNagents.json candidate path did not return a usable contract path="/agents.json" statusCode=404 contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8"WARNNo agents.json candidate was selectedWARNNo Wildcard-style agents.json file was found.AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlInformational
Content Signal
Content Signal has a validation warning at "Validate declared usage preferences".
13 Warning
AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlInformational
Content Signal
Content Signal has a validation warning at "Validate declared usage preferences".
Needs attention
Content Signal
Issue
No Content-Usage or Content-Signal declarations were found.
Why it matters
Content usage preference signals communicate intended downstream AI use separately from robots.txt crawl permission. They can express training and search preferences for compliant systems without replacing access-control rules.
Check name
Content Signal
Score
50/100
Status
warning
Category
Bot Access Control
Maturity
Informational
Goal
Declare AI content usage preferences when the site intentionally publishes machine-readable usage policy.
Result
Content Signal has a validation warning at "Validate declared usage preferences".
Validation steps
Validate declared usage preferences
No Content-Usage or Content-Signal declarations were found.
Evidence log1 step · 5 lines
Validate declared usage preferences [warning]! No Content-Usage or Content-Signal declarations were found.INFOValidate declared usage preferencesINFOParsing declared preferences into terms and values recordCount=0SKIPSkipping declaration validation because no Content-Usage or Content-Signal records were declared.SKIPCompare declared records to validation requirement actual=0 expected="No validation needed when no records are declared"WARNNo Content-Usage or Content-Signal declarations were present.Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation
DNS-AID Agent Discovery
DNS-AID Agent Discovery has a validation warning at "Query DNS-AID records".
13 Warning
Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation
DNS-AID Agent Discovery
DNS-AID Agent Discovery has a validation warning at "Query DNS-AID records".
Needs attention
DNS-AID Agent Discovery
Issue
No DNS-AID HTTPS/SVCB records were found under _agents.
Why it matters
DNS-AID lets agents discover index, A2A, and other agent entrypoints before fetching HTTP metadata. HTTPS/SVCB records provide the service-binding substrate, while DNSSEC can authenticate the discovery answer when available.
Check name
DNS-AID Agent Discovery
Score
50/100
Status
warning
Category
Skill Discovery
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Publish DNS-AID HTTPS/SVCB records under _agents for DNS-based agent entrypoint discovery.
Result
DNS-AID Agent Discovery has a validation warning at "Query DNS-AID records".
Validation steps
Query DNS-AID records
No DNS-AID HTTPS/SVCB records were found under _agents.
Check DNSSEC authentication evidence
DNSSEC authentication evidence was not visible for the DNS-AID labels or hostname.
Evidence log2 steps · 23 lines
Query DNS-AID records [warning]! No DNS-AID HTTPS/SVCB records were found under _agents.INFOQuery DNS-AID recordsINFOBuild DNS-AID query names from hostname hostname="knock.app" labels=["_index._agents.knock.app","_a2a._agents.knock.app"] claimedOnPage=falseWARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_index._agents.knock.app" rrtype="HTTPS" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" rcode=3 ad=false answerCount=0WARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_index._agents.knock.app" rrtype="SVCB" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" rcode=3 ad=false answerCount=0WARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_index._agents.knock.app" rrtype="ANY" resolver="node-resolveAny-fallback" answerCount=0 error="queryAny ETIMEOUT _index._agents.knock.app"WARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_a2a._agents.knock.app" rrtype="HTTPS" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" rcode=3 ad=false answerCount=0WARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_a2a._agents.knock.app" rrtype="SVCB" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" rcode=3 ad=false answerCount=0WARNDNS query returned no DNS-AID answers name="_a2a._agents.knock.app" rrtype="ANY" resolver="node-resolveAny-fallback" answerCount=0 error="queryAny ETIMEOUT _a2a._agents.knock.app"WARNCompare total DNS-AID answer count actual=0 expected="> 0"WARNNo DNS-AID HTTPS/SVCB records were found under _agents.Check DNSSEC authentication evidence [warning]! DNSSEC authentication evidence was not visible for the DNS-AID labels or hostname.INFOCheck DNSSEC authentication evidenceWARNCompare DNSSEC authenticated-data flag actual=false expected=trueWARNCompare visible DNSSEC material actual=false expected=trueWARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_index._agents.knock.app" rrtype="HTTPS" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_index._agents.knock.app" rrtype="SVCB" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_index._agents.knock.app" rrtype="ANY" resolver="node-resolveAny-fallback" dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_a2a._agents.knock.app" rrtype="HTTPS" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_a2a._agents.knock.app" rrtype="SVCB" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_a2a._agents.knock.app" rrtype="ANY" resolver="node-resolveAny-fallback" dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_index._agents.knock.app" rrtype="DNSKEY" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="_a2a._agents.knock.app" rrtype="DNSKEY" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNResolver did not confirm authenticated DNSSEC data name="knock.app" rrtype="DNSKEY" resolver="cloudflare-doh-json" ad=false dnssecTypes=[]WARNDNSSEC authentication evidence was not visible for the DNS-AID labels or hostname.
AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEmerging recommendation
RSL license signal
No RSL declarations were found.
13 Warning
AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEmerging recommendation
RSL license signal
No RSL declarations were found.
Needs attention
RSL license signal
Issue
No RSL declarations were found.
Why it matters
Really Simple Licensing is an emerging rights-expression layer for communicating content usage and licensing terms separately from robots.txt crawl permission.
Check name
RSL license signal
Score
50/100
Status
warning
Category
Bot Access Control
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Declare machine-readable content licensing terms for compliant AI and crawler systems when the site needs them.
Result
No RSL declarations were found.
Validation steps
Discover RSL declarations
No RSL declarations were found.
Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Discover RSL declarations [warning]! No RSL declarations were found.INFODiscover RSL declarationsINFOChecking robots.txt License records, HTTP Link rel=license headers, HTML license links, and inline RSL XML robotsFound=trueSKIPCount discovered RSL declarations actual=0 expected=">= 1 when RSL licensing terms are published" sources={}WARNNo RSL declarations were found on any supported discovery surface.AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEmerging recommendation
TDMRep declaration
No TDMRep declaration was found.
13 Warning
AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEmerging recommendation
TDMRep declaration
No TDMRep declaration was found.
Needs attention
TDMRep declaration
Issue
No TDMRep declaration was found at /.well-known/tdmrep.json.
Why it matters
TDMRep is a W3C Community Group protocol and IANA-registered well-known URI for declaring text and data mining reservation policy on applicable content.
Check name
TDMRep declaration
Score
50/100
Status
warning
Category
Bot Access Control
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Publish a machine-readable text and data mining reservation declaration and verifiable ODRL policy when the site needs one.
Result
No TDMRep declaration was found.
Validation steps
Fetch /.well-known/tdmrep.json
No TDMRep declaration was found at /.well-known/tdmrep.json.
Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Fetch /.well-known/tdmrep.json [warning]! No TDMRep declaration was found at /.well-known/tdmrep.json.INFOFetch /.well-known/tdmrep.jsonINFORequesting origin-level TDMRep declaration at /.well-known/tdmrep.jsonWARNCompare TDMRep file response actual=404 expected="2xx with JSON array when origin-level TDMRep is published" contentType="text/html; charset=utf-8" length=58650WARNNo TDMRep declaration was found at /.well-known/tdmrep.json. AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Semantic HTML
Semantic HTML is partially implemented.
12 Warning
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Semantic HTML
Semantic HTML is partially implemented.
Needs attention
Semantic HTML
Issue
Semantic HTML is incomplete: expected exactly one visible main landmark, found 2; skipped or empty headings; 7 controls missing accessible names; 5 image alt text quality issues.
Details
Why it matters
Semantic HTML gives browsers, assistive technology, search systems, and agents reliable landmarks, headings, controls, form semantics, and image context.
Check name
Semantic HTML
Score
38/100
Status
warning
Category
Content Readiness
Maturity
Established
Goal
Expose readable page structure through semantic HTML and accessible controls.
Result
Semantic HTML is partially implemented.
Validation steps
Page landmarks
Expected exactly one visible main landmark; found 2.
Heading structure
Headings skip levels or include empty heading elements.
Links
2 links use generic anchor text.
Buttons and interactive controls
7 button controls are missing accessible names.
Image text alternatives
5 image alt text issues were found.
Evidence log5 steps · 15 lines
Page landmarks [fail]! Expected exactly one visible main landmark; found 2.INFOPage landmarksFAILCheck page landmarks evidence actual={"counts":{"main":2,"roleMain":0,"nav":1,"roleNavigation":0,"header":1,"roleBanner":0,"footer":1,"pageFooter":0,"roleContentinfo":0},"main":false} expected="semantic HTML evidence for this step"FAILPage landmarks failed issue="Expected exactly one visible main landmark; found 2."Heading structure [fail]! Headings skip levels or include empty heading elements.INFOHeading structureFAILCheck heading structure evidence actual={"counts":{"h1":1,"visibleH1":1,"headings":32,"emptyHeadings":0},"meaningfulH1":true} expected="semantic HTML evidence for this step"FAILHeading structure failed issue="Headings skip levels or include empty heading elements."Links [warning]! 2 links use generic anchor text.INFOLinksWARNCheck links evidence actual={"counts":{"links":91,"inaccessibleLinks":0,"nonCrawlableLinks":0,"genericLinks":2},"accessibleLinks":true} expected="semantic HTML evidence for this step"WARNLinks has a warning issue="2 links use generic anchor text."Buttons and interactive controls [fail]! 7 button controls are missing accessible names.INFOButtons and interactive controlsFAILCheck buttons and interactive controls evidence actual={"counts":{"buttons":34,"inaccessibleButtons":7},"accessibleButtons":false} expected="links, buttons, and form controls expose accessible names"FAILButtons and interactive controls failed issue="7 button controls are missing accessible names."Image text alternatives [warning]! 5 image alt text issues were found.INFOImage text alternativesWARNCheck image text alternatives evidence actual={"counts":{"images":67,"imagesWithAlt":67,"imageAltIssues":5},"imageAltCoverage":true} expected="semantic HTML evidence for this step"WARNImage text alternatives has a warning issue="5 image alt text issues were found."
Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation
Agent Skills index
Agent Skills index failed at "Validate discovery index schema".
11 Fail
Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation
Agent Skills index
Agent Skills index failed at "Validate discovery index schema".
Needs attention
Agent Skills index
Issue
Validate discovery index schema did not pass.
Details
Why it matters
An Agent Skills index lets agents discover task-specific instructions through a small trusted index, then verify and load only the skill artifacts they need.
Check name
Agent Skills index
Score
55/100
Status
fail
Category
Skill Discovery
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Publish an Agent Skills discovery index that advertises digest-pinned SKILL.md or archive artifacts.
Result
Agent Skills index failed at "Validate discovery index schema".
Validation steps
Validate discovery index schema
Serve JSON with $schema set to https://schemas.agentskills.io/discovery/0.2.0/schema.json and a non-empty skills array.
Top-level issues
- skills array must not be empty
Verify advertised artifacts
No valid skill artifacts were available to verify.
Validate skill content
For skill-md artifacts, include valid YAML frontmatter with name and description followed by Markdown. For archives, include a safe root SKILL.md and no unsafe paths.
Review skill artifact security
Do not publish secrets or prompt-injection instructions in skill artifacts. Treat scripts, archives, and cross-origin artifacts as software supply-chain surfaces.
Evidence log4 steps · 14 lines
Validate discovery index schema [fail]INFOValidate discovery index schemaINFOParse Agent Skills index JSON validJson=true contentTypeCompatible=trueFAILCompare $schema URI actual="https://schemas.agentskills.io/discovery/0.2.0/schema.json" expected="https://schemas.agentskills.io/discovery/0.2.0/schema.json"FAILCompare top-level schema issue count actual=1 expected=0FAILCompare unknown top-level field count actual=0 expected=0FAILAgent Skills step failedVerify advertised artifacts [warning]! No valid skill artifacts were available to verify.INFOVerify advertised artifactsWARNCompare artifact fetch count actual=0 expected="> 0"WARNNo valid skill artifacts were available to verify.Validate skill content [warning]INFOValidate skill contentWARNAgent Skills step completed with warningsReview skill artifact security [warning]INFOReview skill artifact securityWARNCompare security finding count actual=0 expected=0WARNAgent Skills step completed with warnings
Agent Ease of UseAPIEstablished
API Catalog
API Catalog has a validation warning at "Check API catalog HEAD Link header".
10 Warning
Agent Ease of UseAPIEstablished
API Catalog
API Catalog has a validation warning at "Check API catalog HEAD Link header".
Needs attention
API Catalog
Issue
HEAD /.well-known/api-catalog did not expose a Link header with rel="api-catalog".
Why it matters
API catalogs help agents find API endpoints, service descriptions, documentation, status resources, auth metadata, and related machine-readable contracts without guessing entry points.
Check name
API Catalog
Score
81/100
Status
warning
Category
API
Maturity
Established
Goal
Publish an API catalog for automated public API discovery using RFC 9727 when this origin exposes public APIs.
Result
API Catalog has a validation warning at "Check API catalog HEAD Link header".
Validation steps
Check API catalog HEAD Link header
HEAD /.well-known/api-catalog did not expose a Link header with rel="api-catalog".
Validate API catalog media type
The API catalog uses application/linkset+json but does not include the recommended RFC 9727 profile parameter.
Validate API catalog targets
API catalog targets are external or same-site only; they were recorded but not fetched by this origin-scoped check.
Evidence log3 steps · 16 lines
Check API catalog HEAD Link header [warning]! HEAD /.well-known/api-catalog did not expose a Link header with rel="api-catalog".INFOCheck API catalog HEAD Link headerINFOSend HEAD request to API catalog path attempted=true statusCode=200 contentType="application/linkset+json"WARNCompare HEAD Link rel=api-catalog count actual=0 expected="> 0"WARNHEAD /.well-known/api-catalog did not expose a Link header with rel="api-catalog". status="warning"Validate API catalog media type [warning]! The API catalog uses application/linkset+json but does not include the recommended RFC 9727 profile parameter.INFOValidate API catalog media typeWARNCompare API catalog media type actual="application/linkset+json" expected="application/linkset+json"WARNCompare RFC 9727 profile parameter actual=false expected=trueWARNThe API catalog uses application/linkset+json but does not include the recommended RFC 9727 profile parameter. status="warning"Validate API catalog targets [warning]! API catalog targets are external or same-site only; they were recorded but not fetched by this origin-scoped check.INFOValidate API catalog targetsINFOFetch same-origin API catalog targets and record same-site/external skipsSKIPSkipped API catalog target fetch rel="service-doc" href="https://docs.knock.app" resolvedUrl="https://docs.knock.app/" reason="Same-site target was recorded but not fetched."SKIPSkipped API catalog target fetch rel="status" href="https://status.knock.app" resolvedUrl="https://status.knock.app/" reason="Same-site target was recorded but not fetched."SKIPSkipped API catalog target fetch rel="service-doc" href="https://docs.knock.app/mapi-reference/overview/about-the-management-api" resolvedUrl="https://docs.knock.app/mapi-reference/overview/about-the-management-api" reason="Same-site target was recorded but not fetched."SKIPSkipped API catalog target fetch rel="status" href="https://status.knock.app" resolvedUrl="https://status.knock.app/" reason="Same-site target was recorded but not fetched."WARNCompare API catalog target failure count actual=0 expected=0WARNAPI catalog targets are external or same-site only; they were recorded but not fetched by this origin-scoped check. status="warning"
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
GEO: Citable passages
GEO: Citable passages scored 0/100 and needs a fix.
9 Fail
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
GEO: Citable passages
GEO: Citable passages scored 0/100 and needs a fix.
Needs attention
GEO: Citable passages
Issue
No evidence-backed, citation-length explanatory paragraph was found.
Details
Why it matters
Generative answer systems work best with visible, self-contained, evidence-backed content, clear entities, trustworthy attribution, structured page sections, and crawler-accessible HTML. These signals improve machine understanding even though they do not guarantee AI citations.
Check name
GEO: Citable passages
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content easy for AI answer engines to extract, cite, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.
Result
GEO: Citable passages scored 0/100 and needs a fix.
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AEO: Answer-first passages
AEO: Answer-first passages scored 20/100 and needs a fix.
7 Fail
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AEO: Answer-first passages
AEO: Answer-first passages scored 20/100 and needs a fix.
Needs attention
AEO: Answer-first passages
Issue
15 section(s) bury or omit a concise opening answer.
Details
Why it matters
Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.
Check name
AEO: Answer-first passages
Score
20/100
Status
fail
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.
Result
AEO: Answer-first passages scored 20/100 and needs a fix.
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Content-Security-Policy
Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate script execution".
7 Fail
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Content-Security-Policy
Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate script execution".
Needs attention
Content-Security-Policy
Issue
script-src leaves script execution broadly unrestricted.
Why it matters
Content Security Policy reduces the impact of injection bugs by limiting where scripts, styles, frames, forms, and other browser resources can load or execute.
Check name
Content-Security-Policy
Score
73/100
Status
fail
Category
Security & Trust
Maturity
Established
Goal
Constrain browser resource loading and script execution with an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.
Result
Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate script execution".
Validation steps
Evaluate script execution
script-src leaves script execution broadly unrestricted.
Review CSP reporting
CSP does not define a reporting endpoint.
Evidence log2 steps · 8 lines
Evaluate script execution [fail]! script-src leaves script execution broadly unrestricted.INFOEvaluate script executionINFOInspect effective script directive effectiveDirective="script-src" sources=["'self'","'unsafe-inline'","'unsafe-eval'","https:"]FAILCompare script execution posture actual={"hasNonce":false,"hasHash":false,"hasStrictDynamic":false,"hasUnsafeInline":true,"hasUnsafeEval":true,"hasWildcardHost":false,"hasBroadScheme":true,"dangerousSchemes":[]} expected="constrained script sources without unsafe execution allowances" issue="script-src leaves script execution broadly unrestricted."FAILscript-src leaves script execution broadly unrestricted.Review CSP reporting [warning]! CSP does not define a reporting endpoint.INFOReview CSP reportingINFOInspect CSP reporting directives reportOnlyHeaderPresent=false reportOnlyDirectives=[]WARNCompare violation reporting configuration actual="no reporting endpoint" expected="report-to or report-uri present" issue="CSP does not define a reporting endpoint."WARNCSP does not define a reporting endpoint.
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AIO: Source and trust signals
AIO: Source and trust signals scored 67/100 and needs improvement.
5 Warning
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AIO: Source and trust signals
AIO: Source and trust signals scored 67/100 and needs improvement.
Needs attention
AIO: Source and trust signals
Issue
Missing AIO trust signals: author, freshnessDate.
Details
Why it matters
Google AI Overviews and AI Mode depend on normal Google Search eligibility, snippet permissions, useful visible content, consistent structured data, trust signals, and page experience basics. These signals help Google understand and preview a page, but they do not guarantee selection.
Check name
AIO: Source and trust signals
Score
67/100
Status
warning
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content eligible, understandable, and previewable for Google Search AI features without promising inclusion.
Result
AIO: Source and trust signals scored 67/100 and needs improvement.
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Author attribution
Author attribution is partially implemented.
4 Warning
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Author attribution
Author attribution is partially implemented.
Needs attention
Author attribution
Issue
Schema.org attribution is incomplete or relies only on publisher/fallback evidence.
Why it matters
Author attribution helps agents cite content responsibly, assess source credibility, and distinguish editorial pages from anonymous marketing copy.
Check name
Author attribution
Score
80/100
Status
warning
Category
Content Readiness
Maturity
Established
Goal
Identify content authors or publishers for trust and attribution.
Result
Author attribution is partially implemented.
Validation steps
Schema.org attribution
Schema.org attribution is incomplete or relies only on publisher/fallback evidence.
Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Schema.org attribution [warning]! Schema.org attribution is incomplete or relies only on publisher/fallback evidence.INFOSchema.org attributionINFOChecking structured data for author, creator, and publisher contributorsWARNCheck named Schema.org author count actual=0 expected="> 0" authorCount=0 publisherCount=1 namedContributors=1 authors=[] publishers=[{"role":"publisher","name":"Knock","type":"Organization","sameAs":[],"format":"json-ld","mergedName":false}] formats=["json-ld"]WARNSchema.org attribution is incomplete or fallback-only authorCount=0 publisherCount=1 authors=[] publishers=[{"role":"publisher","name":"Knock","type":"Organization","sameAs":[],"format":"json-ld","mergedName":false}]GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
GEO: Structured extraction
GEO: Structured extraction scored 63/100 and needs improvement.
3 Warning
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
GEO: Structured extraction
GEO: Structured extraction scored 63/100 and needs improvement.
Needs attention
GEO: Structured extraction
Issue
Missing or weak extraction signals: clean heading hierarchy, summary or key takeaways, FAQ or question-answer section where appropriate.
Details
Why it matters
Generative answer systems work best with visible, self-contained, evidence-backed content, clear entities, trustworthy attribution, structured page sections, and crawler-accessible HTML. These signals improve machine understanding even though they do not guarantee AI citations.
Check name
GEO: Structured extraction
Score
63/100
Status
warning
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content easy for AI answer engines to extract, cite, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.
Result
GEO: Structured extraction scored 63/100 and needs improvement.
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Frame protection
Frame protection has a validation warning at "Review observed browser responses".
3 Warning
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Frame protection
Frame protection has a validation warning at "Review observed browser responses".
Needs attention
Frame protection
Issue
One or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit valid frame protection.
Why it matters
Frame protection blocks hostile sites from embedding pages in deceptive frames, reducing clickjacking and UI redressing risk.
Check name
Frame protection
Score
88/100
Status
warning
Category
Security & Trust
Maturity
Established
Goal
Prevent unwanted framing with an enforcing CSP frame-ancestors directive or a valid X-Frame-Options fallback.
Result
Frame protection has a validation warning at "Review observed browser responses".
Validation steps
Review observed browser responses
One or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit valid frame protection.
Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Review observed browser responses [warning]! One or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit valid frame protection.INFOReview observed browser responsesINFOSample Chrome-observed same-origin responses observedResponseCount=68 sameOriginCount=63 htmlDocumentCount=1WARNCompare observed HTML frame protection actual={"missingOrInvalidFrameProtectionCount":1,"broadFrameAncestorsCount":0,"affected":[{"url":"https://knock.app/","status":200,"resourceType":"document","contentType":"text/html; charset=utf-8","contentSecurityPolicy":"default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https:; connect-src 'self' https:; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://fonts.googleapis.com; img-src 'self' blob: data: https: *.public.blob.vercel-storage.com; media-src 'self' blob: data: https: *.pu","contentSecurityPolicyReportOnly":null}]} expected="0 missing/invalid or broad same-origin HTML responses" issue="One or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit valid frame protection."WARNOne or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit valid frame protection.Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
HSTS header
HSTS header has a validation warning at "Validate max-age".
3 Warning
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
HSTS header
HSTS header has a validation warning at "Validate max-age".
Needs attention
HSTS header
Issue
max-age is below 15552000 seconds.
Why it matters
HSTS tells browsers to keep using HTTPS after the first secure visit, reducing downgrade, SSL-stripping, and mixed-transport risk for repeat users.
Check name
HSTS header
Score
88/100
Status
warning
Category
Security & Trust
Maturity
Established
Goal
Require HTTPS for repeat browser visits with a valid Strict-Transport-Security policy.
Result
HSTS header has a validation warning at "Validate max-age".
Validation steps
Validate max-age
max-age is below 15552000 seconds.
Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Validate max-age [warning]! max-age is below 15552000 seconds.INFOValidate max-ageINFOInspect max-age directive maxAge=2592000 deploymentMinimumSeconds=15552000 preloadStrengthSeconds=31536000WARNCompare HSTS max-age actual=2592000 expected=">= 15552000 seconds" meetsMinimum=false meetsOneYear=false issue="max-age is below 15552000 seconds."WARNmax-age is below 15552000 seconds.AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Organization / WebSite schema
Organization / WebSite schema is partially implemented.
3 Warning
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Organization / WebSite schema
Organization / WebSite schema is partially implemented.
Needs attention
Organization / WebSite schema
Issue
WebSite.publisher is missing.
Why it matters
Organization and WebSite schema help agents identify the publisher, canonical site identity, logo, and related profiles for attribution.
Check name
Organization / WebSite schema
Score
85/100
Status
warning
Category
Content Readiness
Maturity
Established
Goal
Identify the site owner and website entity in structured data.
Result
Organization / WebSite schema is partially implemented.
Validation steps
WebSite publisher linkage
WebSite.publisher is missing.
Evidence log1 step · 5 lines
WebSite publisher linkage [fail]! WebSite.publisher is missing.INFOWebSite publisher linkageINFOChecking whether WebSite.publisher points to the Organization entity websiteFormat="json-ld" organizationFormat="json-ld"FAILCheck publisher presence actual=false expected=true publisher={"present":false,"matchesOrganization":false} website={"name":"Knock","url":"https://knock.app"} organization={"name":"Knock","url":"https://knock.app"}FAILCheck publisher matches Organization actual=false expected=trueFAILWebSite publisher is missingGEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AIO: Visible content clarity
AIO: Visible content clarity scored 81/100 and needs improvement.
3 Warning
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AIO: Visible content clarity
AIO: Visible content clarity scored 81/100 and needs improvement.
Needs attention
AIO: Visible content clarity
Issue
15 section(s) may benefit from clearer answer-first openings. Heading outline issues were detected.
Details
Why it matters
Google AI Overviews and AI Mode depend on normal Google Search eligibility, snippet permissions, useful visible content, consistent structured data, trust signals, and page experience basics. These signals help Google understand and preview a page, but they do not guarantee selection.
Check name
AIO: Visible content clarity
Score
81/100
Status
warning
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content eligible, understandable, and previewable for Google Search AI features without promising inclusion.
Result
AIO: Visible content clarity scored 81/100 and needs improvement.
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AEO: Evidence and trust
AEO: Evidence and trust scored 71/100 and needs improvement.
3 Warning
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AEO: Evidence and trust
AEO: Evidence and trust scored 71/100 and needs improvement.
Needs attention
AEO: Evidence and trust
Issue
Missing answer evidence or trust signals: author, freshnessDate.
Details
Why it matters
Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.
Check name
AEO: Evidence and trust
Score
71/100
Status
warning
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.
Result
AEO: Evidence and trust scored 71/100 and needs improvement.
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AEO: Question and answer structure
AEO: Question and answer structure scored 73/100 and needs improvement.
2 Warning
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AEO: Question and answer structure
AEO: Question and answer structure scored 73/100 and needs improvement.
Needs attention
AEO: Question and answer structure
Issue
Heading structure issues were detected.
Details
Why it matters
Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.
Check name
AEO: Question and answer structure
Score
73/100
Status
warning
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.
Result
AEO: Question and answer structure scored 73/100 and needs improvement.
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEmerging recommendation
llms.txt
llms.txt has a validation warning at "Score llms.txt structure and usefulness".
2 Warning
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEmerging recommendation
llms.txt
llms.txt has a validation warning at "Score llms.txt structure and usefulness".
Needs attention
llms.txt
Issue
llms.txt is present, but its structure or link curation is weaker than the emerging proposal and production examples.
Details
Why it matters
llms.txt is an emerging Markdown convention for giving language-model clients curated context and links before they crawl broadly. Broken, private, or low-signal links make the file much less useful even when it exists.
Check name
llms.txt
Score
89/100
Status
warning
Category
Content Readiness
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Publish a concise llms.txt index that helps agents discover useful public site context.
Result
llms.txt has a validation warning at "Score llms.txt structure and usefulness".
Validation steps
Score llms.txt structure and usefulness
llms.txt is present, but its structure or link curation is weaker than the emerging proposal and production examples.
Findings
- Missing a blockquote summary. The llms.txt proposal recommends a concise blockquote after the H1.
Inspect optional llms-full.txt
Passed.
Evidence log2 steps · 10 lines
Score llms.txt structure and usefulness [warning]! llms.txt is present, but its structure or link curation is weaker than the emerging proposal and production examples.INFOScore llms.txt structure and usefulnessINFOChecking recommended summary, sections, link labels, agent-friendly links, duplicates, and unsafe targetsWARNCheck blockquote summary is present actual=false expected=truePASSCheck H2 section count actual=6 expected="> 0"PASSCheck Markdown-formatted links actual=222 expected="> 0"PASSCheck unsafe/private link count actual=0 expected=0WARNllms.txt structure-quality validation completed with warnings reason="llms.txt is present, but its structure or link curation is weaker than the emerging proposal and production examples."Inspect optional llms-full.txt [informational]INFOInspect optional llms-full.txtINFOTrying to fetch /llms-full.txt url="https://knock.app/llms-full.txt"SKIP/llms-full.txt is not present statusCode=404
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
GEO: Entity clarity
GEO: Entity clarity scored 82/100 and needs improvement.
2 Warning
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
GEO: Entity clarity
GEO: Entity clarity scored 82/100 and needs improvement.
Needs attention
GEO: Entity clarity
Issue
Title/H1 terms missing from description: agent, led, engagementfor, compounding.
Details
Why it matters
Generative answer systems work best with visible, self-contained, evidence-backed content, clear entities, trustworthy attribution, structured page sections, and crawler-accessible HTML. These signals improve machine understanding even though they do not guarantee AI citations.
Check name
GEO: Entity clarity
Score
82/100
Status
warning
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content easy for AI answer engines to extract, cite, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.
Result
GEO: Entity clarity scored 82/100 and needs improvement.
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
GEO: Source and trust signals
GEO: Source and trust signals scored 83/100 and needs improvement.
1 Warning
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
GEO: Source and trust signals
GEO: Source and trust signals scored 83/100 and needs improvement.
Needs attention
GEO: Source and trust signals
Issue
Missing source or trust signals: freshnessDate.
Details
Why it matters
Generative answer systems work best with visible, self-contained, evidence-backed content, clear entities, trustworthy attribution, structured page sections, and crawler-accessible HTML. These signals improve machine understanding even though they do not guarantee AI citations.
Check name
GEO: Source and trust signals
Score
83/100
Status
warning
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content easy for AI answer engines to extract, cite, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.
Result
GEO: Source and trust signals scored 83/100 and needs improvement.
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AEO: Entity and definition clarity
AEO: Entity and definition clarity scored 88/100 and needs improvement.
1 Warning
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AEO: Entity and definition clarity
AEO: Entity and definition clarity scored 88/100 and needs improvement.
Needs attention
AEO: Entity and definition clarity
Issue
15 section(s) bury or omit a concise opening answer.
Why it matters
Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.
Check name
AEO: Entity and definition clarity
Score
88/100
Status
warning
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.
Result
AEO: Entity and definition clarity scored 88/100 and needs improvement.
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Structured data
Structured data has a validation warning at "Schema policy recommendations".
0 Warning
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Structured data
Structured data has a validation warning at "Schema policy recommendations".
Needs attention
Structured data
Issue
SoftwareApplication schema is missing recommended Google field(s): offers.priceCurrency.
Why it matters
Structured data gives agents explicit entities, relationships, and page meaning that are harder to infer reliably from visual layout alone.
Check name
Structured data
Score
98/100
Status
warning
Category
Content Readiness
Maturity
Established
Goal
Expose machine-readable page entities and relationships through a recognized structured-data syntax.
Result
Structured data has a validation warning at "Schema policy recommendations".
Validation steps
Schema policy recommendations
SoftwareApplication schema is missing recommended Google field(s): offers.priceCurrency.
Evidence log1 step · 4 lines
Schema policy recommendations [warning]! SoftwareApplication schema is missing recommended Google field(s): offers.priceCurrency.INFOSchema policy recommendationsINFOChecking search feature recommended fields on detected primary schema nodesWARNCheck schema policy recommendation issue count actual=1 expected=0 issues=[{"schemaTypes":["SoftwareApplication"],"format":"json-ld","missingRecommended":["offers.priceCurrency"],"fieldEvidence":[{"name":"aggregateRating","present":true,"value":"AggregateRating","format":"json-ld"},{"name":"offers.priceCurrency","present":false,"format":"json-ld"}],"message":"SoftwareApplication schema is missing recommended Google field(s): offers.priceCurrency."}]WARNSchema policy recommendations are missing issues=[{"schemaTypes":["SoftwareApplication"],"format":"json-ld","missingRecommended":["offers.priceCurrency"],"fieldEvidence":[{"name":"aggregateRating","present":true,"value":"AggregateRating","format":"json-ld"},{"name":"offers.priceCurrency","present":false,"format":"json-ld"}],"message":"SoftwareApplication schema is missing recommended Google field(s): offers.priceCurrency."}]AI DiscoverabilityDiscoverabilityEstablished
IndexNow key
IndexNow key is informational for this page.
Informational
AI DiscoverabilityDiscoverabilityEstablished
IndexNow key
IndexNow key is informational for this page.
Needs attention
IndexNow key
Issue
IndexNow key is informational for this page.
Why it matters
IndexNow lets sites notify participating search engines about changed URLs, but ownership verification requires a UTF-8 key file whose filename matches the key.
Check name
IndexNow key
Score
100/100
Status
informational
Category
Discoverability
Maturity
Established
Goal
Verify that IndexNow ownership key placement is detectable when the site advertises it.
Result
IndexNow key is informational for this page.
Validation steps
Find advertised IndexNow key location
No IndexNow key location was advertised in HTML, Link headers, or robots.txt.
Fetch and validate IndexNow key file
No discoverable IndexNow key file was found.
Evidence log2 steps · 10 lines
Find advertised IndexNow key location [informational]! No IndexNow key location was advertised in HTML, Link headers, or robots.txt.INFOFind advertised IndexNow key locationINFOLook for IndexNow key hints in HTML, Link headers, and robots.txt supportedHints=["robots.txt IndexNow-Key","rel=indexnow-key","meta name=indexnow-key-location"]PASSCompare advertised key location count actual=0 expected="> 0"WARNNo IndexNow key location was advertised in HTML, Link headers, or robots.txt.Fetch and validate IndexNow key file [informational]! No discoverable IndexNow key file was found.INFOFetch and validate IndexNow key fileINFOLook for IndexNow key hints in HTML, Link headers, and robots.txt supportedHints=["robots.txt IndexNow-Key","rel=indexnow-key","meta name=indexnow-key-location"]PASSCompare advertised key location count actual=0 expected="> 0"INFOFetch each advertised same-origin key file and validate filename/body matchFAILCompare valid IndexNow key file count actual=0 expected="> 0"WARNNo discoverable IndexNow key file was found.
Performance and AccessibilityBest PracticesBrowser audit
Browser errors were logged to the console
100 Fail
Performance and AccessibilityBest PracticesBrowser audit
Browser errors were logged to the console
Check name
Browser errors were logged to the console
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Device
desktop
Category
Best Practices
Fix guidance
Errors logged to the console indicate unresolved problems. They can come from network request failures and other browser concerns. [Learn more about this errors in console diagnostic audit](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/best-practices/errors-in-console/)
Evidence
{
"description": "Errors logged to the console indicate unresolved problems. They can come from network request failures and other browser concerns. [Learn more about this errors in console diagnostic audit](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/best-practices/errors-in-console/)"
}SEOSEOBrowser audit
Links do not have descriptive text
100 Fail
SEOSEOBrowser audit
Links do not have descriptive text
Check name
Links do not have descriptive text
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Device
desktop
Category
SEO
Estimated savings
5 links found
Fix guidance
Descriptive link text helps search engines understand your content. [Learn how to make links more accessible](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/seo/link-text/).
Evidence
{
"description": "Descriptive link text helps search engines understand your content. [Learn how to make links more accessible](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/seo/link-text/).",
"displayValue": "5 links found"
}Performance and AccessibilityAccessibilityBrowser audit
Buttons do not have an accessible name
50 Fail
Performance and AccessibilityAccessibilityBrowser audit
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Check name
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Device
desktop
Category
Accessibility
Fix guidance
When a button doesn't have an accessible name, screen readers announce it as "button", making it unusable for users who rely on screen readers. [Learn how to make buttons more accessible](https://dequeuniversity.com/rules/axe/4.11/button-name).
References
https://web.dev/learn/accessibility/Evidence
{
"description": "When a button doesn't have an accessible name, screen readers announce it as \"button\", making it unusable for users who rely on screen readers. [Learn how to make buttons more accessible](https://dequeuniversity.com/rules/axe/4.11/button-name)."
}Performance and AccessibilityAccessibilityBrowser audit
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
50 Fail
Performance and AccessibilityAccessibilityBrowser audit
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Check name
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Device
desktop
Category
Accessibility
Fix guidance
Properly ordered headings that do not skip levels convey the semantic structure of the page, making it easier to navigate and understand when using assistive technologies. [Learn more about heading order](https://dequeuniversity.com/rules/axe/4.11/heading-order).
References
https://web.dev/learn/accessibility/Evidence
{
"description": "Properly ordered headings that do not skip levels convey the semantic structure of the page, making it easier to navigate and understand when using assistive technologies. [Learn more about heading order](https://dequeuniversity.com/rules/axe/4.11/heading-order)."
}Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit
Forced reflow
20 Fail
Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit
Forced reflow
Check name
Forced reflow
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Device
desktop
Category
Performance
Fix guidance
A forced reflow occurs when JavaScript queries geometric properties (such as offsetWidth) after styles have been invalidated by a change to the DOM state. This can result in poor performance. Learn more about [forced reflows](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/forced-reflow) and possible mitigations.
References
https://web.dev/learn/performance/Evidence
{
"description": "A forced reflow occurs when JavaScript queries geometric properties (such as offsetWidth) after styles have been invalidated by a change to the DOM state. This can result in poor performance. Learn more about [forced reflows](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/forced-reflow) and possible mitigations."
}Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit
Links do not have a discernible name
20 Fail
Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit
Links do not have a discernible name
Check name
Links do not have a discernible name
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Device
desktop
Category
Performance
Fix guidance
Link text (and alternate text for images, when used as links) that is discernible, unique, and focusable improves the navigation experience for screen reader users. [Learn how to make links accessible](https://dequeuniversity.com/rules/axe/4.11/link-name).
References
https://web.dev/learn/performance/Evidence
{
"description": "Link text (and alternate text for images, when used as links) that is discernible, unique, and focusable improves the navigation experience for screen reader users. [Learn how to make links accessible](https://dequeuniversity.com/rules/axe/4.11/link-name)."
}Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit
Avoid enormous network payloads
10 Warning
Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit
Avoid enormous network payloads
Check name
Avoid enormous network payloads
Score
50/100
Status
warning
Device
desktop
Category
Performance
Estimated savings
Total size was 4,038 KiB
Fix guidance
Large network payloads cost users real money and are highly correlated with long load times. [Learn how to reduce payload sizes](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/total-byte-weight/).
References
https://web.dev/learn/performance/Evidence
{
"description": "Large network payloads cost users real money and are highly correlated with long load times. [Learn how to reduce payload sizes](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/total-byte-weight/).",
"displayValue": "Total size was 4,038 KiB",
"numericValue": 4134852
}Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit
Improve image delivery
10 Warning
Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit
Improve image delivery
Check name
Improve image delivery
Score
50/100
Status
warning
Device
desktop
Category
Performance
Estimated savings
Est savings of 190 KiB
Fix guidance
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. [Learn more about optimizing image size](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/image-delivery)
References
https://web.dev/learn/performance/Evidence
{
"description": "Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. [Learn more about optimizing image size](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/image-delivery)",
"displayValue": "Est savings of 190 KiB"
}Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit
Loading performance
6 Fail
Performance and AccessibilityPerformanceBrowser audit
Loading performance
Check name
Loading performance
Score
72/100
Status
fail
Device
desktop
Category
Performance
Fix guidance
Review the grouped loading performance checks and improve the failing sub-checks listed in evidence.
References
https://web.dev/learn/performance/Evidence
{
"checks": [
{
"id": "speed-index",
"score": 48,
"title": "Speed Index",
"displayValue": "2.3 s",
"numericValue": 2342.8288713568127
},
{
"id": "first-contentful-paint",
"score": 100,
"title": "First Contentful Paint",
"displayValue": "0.4 s",
"numericValue": 356.00187522053943
},
{
"id": "max-potential-fid",
"score": 56,
"title": "Max Potential First Input Delay",
"displayValue": "230 ms",
"numericValue": 230.00000000000045
},
{
"id": "largest-contentful-paint",
"score": 94,
"title": "Largest Contentful Paint",
"displayValue": "1.0 s",
"numericValue": 1001.008626014481
},
{
"id": "interactive",
"score": 56,
"title": "Time to Interactive",
"displayValue": "4.2 s",
"numericValue": 4153.338527879559
},
{
"id": "server-response-time",
"score": 100,
"title": "Initial server response time was short",
"displayValue": "Root document took 10 ms",
"numericValue": 9
},
{
"id": "total-blocking-time",
"score": 18,
"title": "Total Blocking Time",
"displayValue": "640 ms",
"numericValue": 640.5
},
{
"id": "network-rtt",
"score": 100,
"title": "Network Round Trip Times",
"displayValue": "20 ms",
"numericValue": 24.082019999999993
}
]
}Fix with MCP or CLI
Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.
Score history
Public scan score over time
Public reports for this website origin. Select any point or report link to open that canonical report.
| Scan date | Score | Readiness | Report |
|---|---|---|---|
| 67/100 | Level 3, Bot-Aware | Current report |