CanAgentUse tools

UCP Suite

Validate Universal Commerce Protocol discovery, then test product search, carts, checkout links, and merchant handoff flows.

MCP Playground

Connect to remote MCP servers, inspect tools and resources, test prompts, auth, headers, notifications, and JSON-RPC responses.

A2A Playground

Inspect Agent Cards, validate advertised endpoints, and prepare safe requests for agent-to-agent workflows.

Agent Website Viewer

Enter a public URL and see the roles, names, landmarks, controls, and blockers that shape how AI agents understand the page.

SCANNED
Jul 4, 2026, 4:08 PM
VISIBILITY
Public
Rescan Report
Share Report
Copy Report Link
Export Report
69/100

OVERALL SCORE

Level 3, Bot-Aware

Moderate readiness for AI agents
AIDiscoverability59%Agent Easeof Use61%Security& Trust66%GEO, AIO, AEO65%SEO100%Performance78%Accessibility100%
  • AI Discoverability 59 out of 100
  • Agent Ease of Use 61 out of 100
  • Security & Trust 66 out of 100
  • GEO, AIO and AEO 65 out of 100
  • SEO 100 out of 100
  • Performance 78 out of 100
  • Accessibility 100 out of 100

CAPTURED SCREENSHOT

Captured website desktop screenshot

What AI sees of your website

The Trusted Provider of Medical Information since 1899 favicon

The Trusted Provider of Medical Information since 1899

The Merck Manuals are the global standard in medical reference for Doctors, Students & Consumers - since 1899.

Open Agent View

Next step

Turn this report into a fix workflow

3 failed checks are ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.

Fix with MCP / CLI
Detailed report scores grouped by capability area
MetricScoreStatusPassedFailedWarningEvidence
AI Discoverability
59
Needs work2610View details
Discoverability
67
Needs work800
Content Readiness
70
Needs work1700
Bot Access Control
45
Priority fix110View details
Agent Ease of Use
61
Needs work400
API
67
Needs work100
Auth
43
Priority fix100
Google Agentic Browsing
100
Strong200
GEO, AIO and AEO
65
Needs work600
GEO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable200
AIO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable200
AEO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable200
SEO
100
Strong1000
SEO
100
Strong1000
Security & Trust
66
Needs work1734View details
Security & Trust
66
Needs work1734View details
Performance
78
Mostly ready1700
Performance
78
Mostly ready1700

Prioritized recommendations

Issues ranked by score impact

3 items need attention

AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEstablished

AI bot rules in robots.txt

AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".

69 Fail

Needs attention

AI bot rules in robots.txt

Failed check
01

Issue

No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.

Details

02

Why it matters

AI crawler product tokens have different meanings. Explicit robots.txt groups make training, search, and retrieval access policy auditable for compliant crawler operators.

Check name

AI bot rules in robots.txt

Score

31/100

Status

fail

Category

Bot Access Control

Maturity

Established

Goal

Declare deliberate robots.txt rules for major AI training, AI search, user-triggered, and dataset crawlers.

Result

AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".

Validation steps

  1. Classify AI crawler rules

    No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.

    robots.txt lacks explicit AI crawler rules
Evidence log1 step · 6 lines
Classify AI crawler rules [fail]! No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.INFOClassify AI crawler rulesINFOParsing User-agent groups and Allow/Disallow records for known AI crawler tokens evaluatedPath="/"INFOEvaluating exact User-agent matches before wildcard fallback exactAiPolicyCount=0 totalCrawlerTokens=18FAILNo explicit AI crawler User-agent groups were found examplesExpected=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ClaudeBot","Google-Extended","CCBot"]FAILCompare explicit AI crawler coverage actual=0 expected="> 0 explicit non-search AI crawler policies" missingTokens=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ChatGPT-User","ClaudeBot","Claude-SearchBot","Claude-User","Google-Extended","Applebot-Extended","Amazonbot","Amzn-SearchBot","Amzn-User","PerplexityBot"]INFOResolved effective root-path policy for crawler tokens blocked=0 allowed=21 unspecified=0

Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished

Frame protection

Frame protection failed at "Validate X-Frame-Options".

28 Fail

Needs attention

Frame protection

Failed check
01

Issue

No valid X-Frame-Options fallback is present.

Details

02

Why it matters

Frame protection blocks hostile sites from embedding pages in deceptive frames, reducing clickjacking and UI redressing risk.

Check name

Frame protection

Score

44/100

Status

fail

Category

Security & Trust

Maturity

Established

Goal

Prevent unwanted framing with an enforcing CSP frame-ancestors directive or a valid X-Frame-Options fallback.

Result

Frame protection failed at "Validate X-Frame-Options".

Validation steps

  1. Validate CSP frame-ancestors

    No enforcing CSP frame-ancestors directive is present.

    CSP frame-ancestors is missing or ineffective
  2. Validate X-Frame-Options

    No valid X-Frame-Options fallback is present.

    X-Frame-Options is missing, invalid, or obsolete
  3. Review observed browser responses

    One or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit valid frame protection.

    Observed same-origin HTML responses lack frame protection
Evidence log3 steps · 12 lines
Validate CSP frame-ancestors [warning]! No enforcing CSP frame-ancestors directive is present.INFOValidate CSP frame-ancestorsINFORead CSP frame-ancestors signals enforcingHeaderPresent=true reportOnlyHeaderPresent=false metaFrameAncestors=false policyCount=1 duplicateDirectives=[]WARNCompare effective frame-ancestors directive actual="missing" expected="valid restrictive enforcing frame-ancestors" issue="No enforcing CSP frame-ancestors directive is present."WARNNo enforcing CSP frame-ancestors directive is present.Validate X-Frame-Options [fail]! No valid X-Frame-Options fallback is present.INFOValidate X-Frame-OptionsINFORead X-Frame-Options fallback value="missing" parsedValues=[] normalizedValues=[]FAILCompare X-Frame-Options value actual="missing" expected="DENY or SAMEORIGIN" valid=false obsoleteAllowFrom=false duplicateOrConflicting=false issue="No valid X-Frame-Options fallback is present."FAILNo valid X-Frame-Options fallback is present.Review observed browser responses [warning]! One or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit valid frame protection.INFOReview observed browser responsesINFOSample Chrome-observed same-origin responses observedResponseCount=69 sameOriginCount=59 htmlDocumentCount=1WARNCompare observed HTML frame protection actual={"missingOrInvalidFrameProtectionCount":1,"broadFrameAncestorsCount":0,"affected":[{"url":"https://www.merckmanuals.com/","status":200,"resourceType":"document","contentType":"text/html; charset=utf-8","contentSecurityPolicy":"default-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://apps.sitecore.net *; img-src 'self' data: *; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://fonts.googleapis.com *; font-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://fonts.gstatic.com *; upgrade-insecure-requests; block-all-mixed-content;","contentSecurityPolicyReportOnly":null}]} expected="0 missing/invalid or broad same-origin HTML responses" issue="One or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit valid frame protection."WARNOne or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit valid frame protection.

Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished

Content-Security-Policy

Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate fetch baseline".

25 Fail

Needs attention

Content-Security-Policy

Failed check
01

Issue

default-src is present but not meaningfully restrictive.

Details

02

Why it matters

Content Security Policy reduces the impact of injection bugs by limiting where scripts, styles, frames, forms, and other browser resources can load or execute.

Check name

Content-Security-Policy

Score

50/100

Status

fail

Category

Security & Trust

Maturity

Established

Goal

Constrain browser resource loading and script execution with an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.

Result

Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate fetch baseline".

Validation steps

  1. Evaluate fetch baseline

    default-src is present but not meaningfully restrictive.

    CSP fetch baseline is too broad or missing
  2. Evaluate script execution

    default-src leaves script execution broadly unrestricted.

    CSP script execution policy is unsafe
  3. Review hardening directives

    CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri.

    CSP hardening directives are missing or weak
  4. Review CSP reporting

    CSP does not define a reporting endpoint.

    CSP reporting is missing or incomplete
Evidence log4 steps · 16 lines
Evaluate fetch baseline [fail]! default-src is present but not meaningfully restrictive.INFOEvaluate fetch baselineINFOEvaluate resource loading fallback defaultSrc=["'self'","'unsafe-inline'","'unsafe-eval'","https://apps.sitecore.net","*"] explicitFetchDirectives=["font-src","img-src","style-src"]FAILCompare fetch baseline actual=["'self'","'unsafe-inline'","'unsafe-eval'","https://apps.sitecore.net","*"] expected="restricted default-src or broad explicit fetch coverage" issue="default-src is present but not meaningfully restrictive."FAILdefault-src is present but not meaningfully restrictive.Evaluate script execution [fail]! default-src leaves script execution broadly unrestricted.INFOEvaluate script executionINFOInspect effective script directive effectiveDirective="default-src" sources=["'self'","'unsafe-inline'","'unsafe-eval'","https://apps.sitecore.net","*"]FAILCompare script execution posture actual={"hasNonce":false,"hasHash":false,"hasStrictDynamic":false,"hasUnsafeInline":true,"hasUnsafeEval":true,"hasWildcardHost":true,"hasBroadScheme":false,"dangerousSchemes":[]} expected="constrained script sources without unsafe execution allowances" issue="default-src leaves script execution broadly unrestricted."FAILdefault-src leaves script execution broadly unrestricted.Review hardening directives [warning]! CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri.INFOReview hardening directivesINFOInspect CSP hardening directives objectSrcFallback=["'self'","'unsafe-inline'","'unsafe-eval'","https://apps.sitecore.net","*"] formCount=0WARNCompare recommended hardening coverage actual=["object-src","base-uri"] expected="no missing object-src/base-uri/form-action requirements" issue="CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri."WARNCSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri.Review CSP reporting [warning]! CSP does not define a reporting endpoint.INFOReview CSP reportingINFOInspect CSP reporting directives reportOnlyHeaderPresent=false reportOnlyDirectives=[]WARNCompare violation reporting configuration actual="no reporting endpoint" expected="report-to or report-uri present" issue="CSP does not define a reporting endpoint."WARNCSP does not define a reporting endpoint.

Sign in to see 30 other issues and the full report

Create a free account to unlock every issue, evidence details, exports, and higher free limits.

Email code

Fix with MCP or CLI

Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.

Fix with MCP / CLI

Score history

Public scan score over time

Public reports for this website origin. Select any point or report link to open that canonical report.

1 reports
Public score history report links
Scan dateScoreReadinessReport
69/100Level 3, Bot-AwareCurrent report