CanAgentUse tools

UCP Suite

Validate Universal Commerce Protocol discovery, then test product search, carts, checkout links, and merchant handoff flows.

MCP Playground

Connect to remote MCP servers, inspect tools and resources, test prompts, auth, headers, notifications, and JSON-RPC responses.

A2A Playground

Inspect Agent Cards, validate advertised endpoints, and prepare safe requests for agent-to-agent workflows.

Agent Website Viewer

Enter a public URL and see the roles, names, landmarks, controls, and blockers that shape how AI agents understand the page.

SCANNED
Jul 2, 2026, 7:04 PM
VISIBILITY
Public
Rescan Report
Share Report
Copy Report Link
Export Report
50/100

OVERALL SCORE

Level 3, Bot-Aware

Moderate readiness for AI agents
AIDiscoverability36%Agent Easeof Use62%Security& Trust72%GEO, AIO, AEO69%SEO85%Performance83%Accessibility0%
  • AI Discoverability 36 out of 100
  • Agent Ease of Use 62 out of 100
  • Security & Trust 72 out of 100
  • GEO, AIO and AEO 69 out of 100
  • SEO 85 out of 100
  • Performance 83 out of 100
  • Accessibility 0 out of 100

CAPTURED SCREENSHOT

Captured website desktop screenshot

What AI sees of your website

Welcome to the Royal Society | Royal Society favicon

Welcome to the Royal Society | Royal Society

The Royal Society is a Fellowship of many of the world's most eminent scientists and is the oldest scientific academy in continuous existence.

Open Agent View

Next step

Turn this report into a fix workflow

2 failed checks are ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.

Fix with MCP / CLI
Detailed report scores grouped by capability area
MetricScoreStatusPassedFailedWarningEvidence
AI Discoverability
36
Priority fix1651View details
Discoverability
40
Priority fix400
Content Readiness
36
Priority fix1200
Bot Access Control
34
Priority fix051View details
Agent Ease of Use
62
Needs work300
API
67
Needs work100
Google Agentic Browsing
100
Strong200
GEO, AIO and AEO
69
Needs work1000
GEO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable300
AIO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable400
AEO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable300
SEO
85
Mostly ready800
SEO
85
Mostly ready800
Security & Trust
72
Needs work1800
Security & Trust
72
Needs work1800
Performance
83
Mostly ready1300
Performance
83
Mostly ready1300
Accessibility
0
Priority fix010View details
Accessibility
0
Priority fix010View details

Prioritized recommendations

Issues ranked by score impact

3 items need attention

AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEstablished

AI bot rules in robots.txt

AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Fetch robots.txt".

50 Fail

Needs attention

AI bot rules in robots.txt

Failed check
01

Issue

No robots.txt content was available to inspect for AI bot rules.

Details

02

Why it matters

AI crawler product tokens have different meanings. Explicit robots.txt groups make training, search, and retrieval access policy auditable for compliant crawler operators.

Check name

AI bot rules in robots.txt

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Category

Bot Access Control

Maturity

Established

Goal

Declare deliberate robots.txt rules for major AI training, AI search, user-triggered, and dataset crawlers.

Result

AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Fetch robots.txt".

Validation steps

  1. Fetch robots.txt

    No robots.txt content was available to inspect for AI bot rules.

    robots.txt is missing for AI crawler policy inspection
  2. Classify AI crawler rules

    No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.

    robots.txt lacks explicit AI crawler rules
Evidence log2 steps · 10 lines
Fetch robots.txt [fail]! No robots.txt content was available to inspect for AI bot rules.INFOFetch robots.txtINFORequesting /robots.txt from the site originFAILCheck whether robots.txt content is available actual="no content" expected="content returned" length=0FAILNo robots.txt content was available to inspect for AI bot rules.Classify AI crawler rules [fail]! No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.INFOClassify AI crawler rulesINFOParsing User-agent groups and Allow/Disallow records for known AI crawler tokens evaluatedPath="/"INFOEvaluating exact User-agent matches before wildcard fallback exactAiPolicyCount=0 totalCrawlerTokens=18FAILNo explicit AI crawler User-agent groups were found examplesExpected=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ClaudeBot","Google-Extended","CCBot"]FAILCompare explicit AI crawler coverage actual=0 expected="> 0 explicit non-search AI crawler policies" missingTokens=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ChatGPT-User","ClaudeBot","Claude-SearchBot","Claude-User","Google-Extended","Applebot-Extended","Amazonbot","Amzn-SearchBot","Amzn-User","PerplexityBot"]INFOResolved effective root-path policy for crawler tokens blocked=0 allowed=0 unspecified=21

AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEmerging recommendation

ai.txt policy

ai.txt policy failed at "Fetch /ai.txt".

41 Fail

Needs attention

ai.txt policy

Failed check
01

Issue

/ai.txt returned HTTP 403.

Details

02

Why it matters

ai.txt is a fragmented emerging convention. It can communicate human-readable AI crawling, training, attribution, restriction, and contact guidance, but it is not a standard access-control mechanism and absence should not be penalized.

Check name

ai.txt policy

Score

18/100

Status

fail

Category

Bot Access Control

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish an advisory human-readable AI usage policy only when the site intentionally needs one.

Result

ai.txt policy failed at "Fetch /ai.txt".

Validation steps

  1. Fetch /ai.txt

    /ai.txt returned HTTP 403.

    /ai.txt could not be fetched when present
  2. Validate transport

    ai.txt appears to be an HTML page or error document rather than a plain-text policy.

    /ai.txt transport is invalid or not plain text
  3. Parse ai.txt policy

    Transport validation failed before policy parsing could be trusted.

    /ai.txt policy format is missing required sections or non-standard
  4. Validate policy content

    ai.txt does not follow the AI Visibility section model; treating it as non-standard advisory text.

    /ai.txt content is incomplete or unsafe
Evidence log4 steps · 18 lines
Fetch /ai.txt [fail]! /ai.txt returned HTTP 403.INFOFetch /ai.txtINFORequesting optional advisory policy file at /ai.txtFAILCompare /ai.txt HTTP response actual=403 expected="2xx when ai.txt is intentionally published; 404/410 means absent optional file" contentType="text/html" length=1644FAIL/ai.txt returned HTTP 403. statusCode=403Validate transport [fail]! ai.txt appears to be an HTML page or error document rather than a plain-text policy.INFOValidate transportINFOChecking ai.txt media type, size, line count, and whether the response looks like plain text contentType="text/html" length=1644 lineCount=59FAILCompare media type to preferred text/plain transport actual="text/html" expected="text/plain preferred; readable text required"FAILai.txt appears to be an HTML page or error document rather than a plain-text policy.Parse ai.txt policy [fail]! Transport validation failed before policy parsing could be trusted.INFOParse ai.txt policyINFODetecting ai.txt convention from bracket sections, frontmatter, headings, and ai.txt context linksINFODetected policy structure convention="unknown-text" sections=[] markdownHeadings=[]WARNCheck AI Visibility required sections actual="missing identity, permissions, restrictions" expected="identity, permissions, and restrictions" missingRecommended=["attribution","contact","content-types"]WARNTransport validation failed before policy parsing could be trusted.Validate policy content [warning]! ai.txt does not follow the AI Visibility section model; treating it as non-standard advisory text.INFOValidate policy contentINFOChecking required section content, permission/restriction language, attribution, contact details, and safety risks convention="unknown-text"INFODetected policy signals hasPermissionLanguage=false hasRestrictionLanguage=false hasTrainingLanguage=false hasAttributionLanguage=false hasContact=falseWARNCheck required and recommended section coverage actual={"missingRequired":["identity","permissions","restrictions"],"missingRecommended":["attribution","contact","content-types"]} expected={"missingRequired":[],"recommendedPresentWhenPossible":true}WARNai.txt does not follow the AI Visibility section model; treating it as non-standard advisory text.

AccessibilityAccessibilityBrowser audit

Accessibility audit

100 Fail

Check name

Accessibility audit

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Device

desktop

Category

Accessibility

Fix guidance

Make sure the page can load in Chrome and run Accessibility checks.

Evidence
{
  "error": "__name is not defined"
}

Sign in to see 41 other issues and the full report

Create a free account to unlock every issue, evidence details, exports, and higher free limits.

Email code

Fix with MCP or CLI

Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.

Fix with MCP / CLI

Score history

Public scan score over time

Public reports for this website origin. Select any point or report link to open that canonical report.

1 reports
Public score history report links
Scan dateScoreReadinessReport
50/100Level 3, Bot-AwareCurrent report