CanAgentUse

https://www.swr.de/
Rescan Report
Share Report
Copy Report Link
New Scan
https://www.swr.de/
Rescan Report
Share Report
Copy Report Link
Export Report
53/100

OVERALL SCORE

Level 3, Bot-Aware

Moderate readiness for AI agents
AIDiscoverability56%Agent Easeof Use50%Security& Trust53%GEO, AIO, AEO45%SEO100%Performance86%Accessibility38%
  • AI Discoverability 56 out of 100
  • Agent Ease of Use 50 out of 100
  • Security & Trust 53 out of 100
  • GEO, AIO and AEO 45 out of 100
  • SEO 100 out of 100
  • Performance 86 out of 100
  • Accessibility 38 out of 100

CAPTURED SCREENSHOT

Captured website desktop screenshot

What AI sees of your website

Südwestrundfunk | SWR.de favicon

Südwestrundfunk | SWR.de

Nachrichten aus Baden-Württemberg und Rheinland-Pfalz, das SWR-Programm in Radio und Fernsehen sowie die Mediathek mit aktuellen Videos.

Next step

Turn this report into a fix workflow

1 failed check is ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.

Detailed report scores grouped by capability area
MetricScoreStatusPassedFailedWarningEvidence
AI Discoverability
56
Needs work2131View details
Discoverability
67
Needs work800
Content Readiness
36
Priority fix1031View details
Bot Access Control
63
Needs work300
Agent Ease of Use
50
Needs work110View details
Google Agentic Browsing
50
Needs work110View details
GEO, AIO and AEO
45
Priority fix623View details
GEO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable200
AIO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable300
AEO Readiness
37
Priority fix123View details
SEO
100
Strong1000
SEO
100
Strong1000
Security & Trust
53
Needs work1000
Security & Trust
53
Needs work1000
Performance
86
Mostly ready1300
Performance
86
Mostly ready1300

Prioritized recommendations

Issues ranked by score impact

7 items need attention

AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished

Author attribution

Author attribution is partially implemented.

95 Fail

Needs attention

Author attribution

Failed check
01

Issue

Applicable editorial content has no usable author, creator, publisher, visible byline, or HTML attribution signal.

02

Why it matters

Author attribution helps agents cite content responsibly, assess source credibility, and distinguish editorial pages from anonymous marketing copy.

Check name

Author attribution

Score

5/100

Status

fail

Category

Content Readiness

Maturity

Established

Goal

Identify content authors or publishers for trust and attribution.

Result

Author attribution is partially implemented.

Validation steps

  1. Schema.org attribution

    Editorial content has no Schema.org author, creator, or publisher attribution.

  2. Author identity quality

    No named author or publisher identity could be extracted.

  3. Visible byline parity

    Structured author/publisher names were not found in visible byline text.

  4. HTML attribution support

    No supporting HTML author metadata, rel=author link, or visible byline was found.

Evidence log4 steps · 16 lines
Schema.org attribution [fail]! Editorial content has no Schema.org author, creator, or publisher attribution.INFOSchema.org attributionINFOChecking structured data for author, creator, and publisher contributorsFAILCheck named Schema.org author count actual=0 expected="> 0" authorCount=0 publisherCount=0 namedContributors=0 authors=[] publishers=[] formats=[]FAILNo Schema.org author, creator, or publisher attribution foundAuthor identity quality [fail]! No named author or publisher identity could be extracted.INFOAuthor identity qualityINFOChecking contributors for stable identity signalsFAILCheck identified contributor count actual=0 expected="> 0" namedContributors=0 identifiedContributors=[] unidentifiedContributors=[]FAILNo named contributor identity could be extractedVisible byline parity [fail]! Structured author/publisher names were not found in visible byline text.INFOVisible byline parityINFOComparing structured contributor names with visible byline evidenceFAILCheck visible attribution matches actual=0 expected="> 0 or visible byline present" visibleByline=false bylineCount=0FAILNo visible byline parity foundHTML attribution support [warning]! No supporting HTML author metadata, rel=author link, or visible byline was found.INFOHTML attribution supportINFOChecking meta author, rel=author, and visible byline supportWARNCheck HTML attribution support signals actual=0 expected="> 0" metaAuthor=false relAuthor=false visibleByline=falseWARNNo supporting HTML attribution signal found

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Answer-first passages

AEO: Answer-first passages scored 0/100 and needs a fix.

7 Fail

Needs attention

AEO: Answer-first passages

Failed check
01

Issue

67 section(s) bury or omit a concise opening answer. No direct definition pattern was detected.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Answer-first passages

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Answer-first passages scored 0/100 and needs a fix.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Evidence and trust

AEO: Evidence and trust scored 29/100 and needs a fix.

5 Fail

Needs attention

AEO: Evidence and trust

Failed check
01

Issue

Missing answer evidence or trust signals: author, publisher, sameAs, aboutOrContact, policyLinks.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Evidence and trust

Score

29/100

Status

fail

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Evidence and trust scored 29/100 and needs a fix.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Answer-surface controls

AEO: Answer-surface controls scored 75/100 and needs improvement.

2 Warning

Needs attention

AEO: Answer-surface controls

Warning
01

Issue

5 data-nosnippet element(s) found.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Answer-surface controls

Score

75/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Answer-surface controls scored 75/100 and needs improvement.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Entity and definition clarity

AEO: Entity and definition clarity scored 80/100 and needs improvement.

1 Warning

Needs attention

AEO: Entity and definition clarity

Warning
01

Issue

No direct definition sentence was detected.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Entity and definition clarity

Score

80/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Entity and definition clarity scored 80/100 and needs improvement.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Extractable visible copy

AEO: Extractable visible copy scored 81/100 and needs improvement.

1 Warning

Needs attention

AEO: Extractable visible copy

Warning
01

Issue

Visible text has few answer-oriented terms or explanatory markers.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Extractable visible copy

Score

81/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Extractable visible copy scored 81/100 and needs improvement.

Agent Ease of UseGoogle Agentic BrowsingBrowser audit

Accessibility tree is not well-formed

100 Fail

Check name

Accessibility tree is not well-formed

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Device

desktop

Category

Google Agentic Browsing

Fix guidance

A well-formed [accessibility tree](http://goo.gle/lighthouse-agentic-a11y) helps AI agents to navigate and interact with the page.

Evidence
{
  "description": "A well-formed [accessibility tree](http://goo.gle/lighthouse-agentic-a11y) helps AI agents to navigate and interact with the page."
}

Sign in to see 41 other issues and the full report

Create a free account to unlock every issue, evidence details, exports, and higher free limits.

Email code

Fix with MCP or CLI

Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.

Score history

Public scan score over time

Public reports for this website origin. Select any point or report link to open that canonical report.

1 reports
Public score history report links
Scan dateScoreReadinessReport
53/100Level 3, Bot-AwareCurrent report