CanAgentUse

CanAgentUse products

MCP ServerInstall CanAgentUse in your coding agent so scan findings become repo-ready fixes.View product WooCommerce PluginPublish UCP discovery and agent-ready commerce signals from WooCommerce without rebuilding checkout.View product Shopify PluginAdd UCP discovery, storefront metadata checks, and controlled cart-to-checkout flows for shopping agents.View product AgentReady CIScan commits and PRs, publish reports, and choose which agent-readiness failures should block merges.View product

CanAgentUse tools

UCP Suite

Validate Universal Commerce Protocol discovery, then test product search, carts, checkout links, and merchant handoff flows.

UCP ValidatorUCP Playground

MCP Playground

Connect to remote MCP servers, inspect tools and resources, test prompts, auth, headers, notifications, and JSON-RPC responses.

MCP Playground

A2A Playground

Inspect Agent Cards, validate advertised endpoints, and prepare safe requests for agent-to-agent workflows.

A2A Playground

Agent Website Viewer

Enter a public URL and see the roles, names, landmarks, controls, and blockers that shape how AI agents understand the page.

Agent Website Viewer
New Scan
https://tabelog.com/
SCANNED
Jul 2, 2026, 8:51 PM
VISIBILITY
Public
SUITE2026.06.10
Rescan Report
Share Report
Copy Report Link
Export Report
44/100

OVERALL SCORE

Level 2, Agent-Limited

Priority improvements needed for AI agents
AIDiscoverability52%Agent Easeof Use44%Security& Trust73%GEO, AIO, AEO53%SEO92%Performance40%Accessibility0%
  • AI Discoverability 52 out of 100
  • Agent Ease of Use 44 out of 100
  • Security & Trust 73 out of 100
  • GEO, AIO and AEO 53 out of 100
  • SEO 92 out of 100
  • Performance 40 out of 100
  • Accessibility 0 out of 100

CAPTURED SCREENSHOT

Captured website desktop screenshot

What AI sees of your website

食べログ【掲載店舗数No.1】グルメ・レストラン予約サイト favicon

食べログ【掲載店舗数No.1】グルメ・レストラン予約サイト

お店探し・ネット予約ならグルメサイト「食べログ」で！全国にあるレストラン902,241件の飲食店情報を掲載中。独自のランキングやユーザーの口コミ・写真をもとに、様々なジャンルの人気のレストラン、目的や予算にぴったりのお店が見つけられます！

Open Agent View

Next step

Turn this report into a fix workflow

1 failed check is ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.

Fix with MCP / CLI
Detailed report scores grouped by capability area
MetricScoreStatusPassedFailedWarningEvidence
AI Discoverability
52
Needs work2400
Discoverability
67
Needs work800
Content Readiness
40
Priority fix1300
Bot Access Control
50
Needs work300
Agent Ease of Use
44
Priority fix210View details
Auth
37
Priority fix100
Google Agentic Browsing
33
Priority fix110View details
GEO, AIO and AEO
53
Needs work623View details
GEO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable200
AIO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable300
AEO Readiness
34
Priority fix123View details
SEO
92
Strong900
SEO
92
Strong900
Security & Trust
73
Needs work1500
Security & Trust
73
Needs work1500
Performance
40
Priority fix900
Performance
40
Priority fix900
Accessibility
0
Priority fix010View details
Accessibility
0
Priority fix010View details

Prioritized recommendations

Issues ranked by score impact

7 items need attention

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Answer-first passages

AEO: Answer-first passages scored 0/100 and needs a fix.

7 Fail

Needs attention

AEO: Answer-first passages

Failed check
01

Issue

32 section(s) bury or omit a concise opening answer. No direct definition pattern was detected.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Answer-first passages

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Answer-first passages scored 0/100 and needs a fix.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Evidence and trust

AEO: Evidence and trust scored 43/100 and needs a fix.

4 Fail

Needs attention

AEO: Evidence and trust

Failed check
01

Issue

Missing answer evidence or trust signals: author, publisher, freshnessDate, sameAs.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Evidence and trust

Score

43/100

Status

fail

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Evidence and trust scored 43/100 and needs a fix.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Entity and definition clarity

AEO: Entity and definition clarity scored 54/100 and needs improvement.

3 Warning

Needs attention

AEO: Entity and definition clarity

Warning
01

Issue

Title, h1, description, and opening copy are weakly aligned. No direct definition sentence was detected.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Entity and definition clarity

Score

54/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Entity and definition clarity scored 54/100 and needs improvement.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Question and answer structure

AEO: Question and answer structure scored 55/100 and needs improvement.

3 Warning

Needs attention

AEO: Question and answer structure

Warning
01

Issue

No natural question headings were detected. No visible FAQ or Q&A pattern was detected.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Question and answer structure

Score

55/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Question and answer structure scored 55/100 and needs improvement.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Extractable visible copy

AEO: Extractable visible copy scored 81/100 and needs improvement.

1 Warning

Needs attention

AEO: Extractable visible copy

Warning
01

Issue

Visible text has few answer-oriented terms or explanatory markers.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Extractable visible copy

Score

81/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Extractable visible copy scored 81/100 and needs improvement.

AccessibilityAccessibilityBrowser audit

Accessibility audit

100 Fail

Check name

Accessibility audit

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Device

desktop

Category

Accessibility

Fix guidance

Make sure the page can load in Chrome and run Accessibility checks.

Evidence
{
  "error": "__name is not defined"
}

Agent Ease of UseGoogle Agentic BrowsingBrowser audit

Accessibility tree is not well-formed

100 Fail

Check name

Accessibility tree is not well-formed

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Device

desktop

Category

Google Agentic Browsing

Fix guidance

A well-formed [accessibility tree](http://goo.gle/lighthouse-agentic-a11y) helps AI agents to navigate and interact with the page.

Evidence
{
  "description": "A well-formed [accessibility tree](http://goo.gle/lighthouse-agentic-a11y) helps AI agents to navigate and interact with the page."
}

Sign in to see 41 other issues and the full report

Create a free account to unlock every issue, evidence details, exports, and higher free limits.

Email code

Fix with MCP or CLI

Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.

Fix with MCP / CLI

Score history

Public scan score over time

Public reports for this website origin. Select any point or report link to open that canonical report.

1 reports
Public score history report links
Scan dateScoreReadinessReport
44/100Level 2, Agent-LimitedCurrent report