CanAgentUse

CanAgentUse products

Agentic Browsing AuditCheck dialogs, menus, drawers, popovers, form errors, checkout steps, and other UI states that a standard Lighthouse scan may not capture.View product MCP ServerInstall CanAgentUse in your coding agent so scan findings become repo-ready fixes.View product WooCommerce PluginPublish UCP discovery and agent-ready commerce signals from WooCommerce without rebuilding checkout.View product Shopify PluginAdd UCP discovery, storefront metadata checks, and controlled cart-to-checkout flows for shopping agents.View product AgentReady CIScan commits and PRs, publish reports, and choose which agent-readiness failures should block merges.View product

CanAgentUse tools

UCP Suite

Validate Universal Commerce Protocol discovery, then test product search, carts, checkout links, and merchant handoff flows.

UCP ValidatorUCP Playground

MCP Playground

Connect to remote MCP servers, inspect tools and resources, test prompts, auth, headers, notifications, and JSON-RPC responses.

MCP Playground

A2A Playground

Inspect Agent Cards, validate advertised endpoints, and prepare safe requests for agent-to-agent workflows.

A2A Playground

Agent Website Viewer

Enter a public URL and see the roles, names, landmarks, controls, and blockers that shape how AI agents understand the page.

Agent Website Viewer
New Scan
https://www.techzilla.it/
SCANNED
Jul 16, 2026, 6:52 AM
VISIBILITY
Public
SUITE2026.06.10
Rescan Report
Share Report
Copy Report Link
Export Report
72/100

OVERALL SCORE

Level 3, Bot-Aware

Moderate readiness for AI agents
AIDiscoverability64%Agent Easeof Use58%Security& Trust93%GEO, AIO, AEO53%SEO100%Performance97%Accessibility85%
  • AI Discoverability 64 out of 100
  • Agent Ease of Use 58 out of 100
  • Security & Trust 93 out of 100
  • GEO, AIO and AEO 53 out of 100
  • SEO 100 out of 100
  • Performance 97 out of 100
  • Accessibility 85 out of 100

CAPTURED SCREENSHOT

Captured website desktop screenshot

What AI sees of your website

Techzilla.it | Tecnologia, Recensioni e Guide favicon

Techzilla.it | Tecnologia, Recensioni e Guide

Recensioni, guide e news tech: scegli meglio, senza perdere tempo.

Open Agent View

Next step

Turn this report into a fix workflow

1 failed check is ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.

Fix with MCP / CLI
Detailed report scores grouped by capability area
MetricScoreStatusPassedFailedWarningEvidence
AI Discoverability
64
Needs work3300
Discoverability
47
Priority fix600
Content Readiness
83
Mostly ready2400
Bot Access Control
63
Needs work300
Agent Ease of Use
58
Needs work531View details
Skill Discovery
46
Priority fix231View details
Google Agentic Browsing
100
Strong300
GEO, AIO and AEO
53
Needs work414View details
GEO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable100
AIO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable200
AEO Readiness
43
Priority fix114View details
SEO
100
Strong1000
SEO
100
Strong1000
Security & Trust
93
Strong2500
Security & Trust
93
Strong2500
Performance
97
Strong1510View details
Performance
97
Strong1510View details

Prioritized recommendations

Issues ranked by score impact

7 items need attention

Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation

agents.json

agents.json failed at "Validate Wildcard schema shape".

65 Fail

Needs attention

agents.json

Failed check
01

Issue

agents.json does not match the expected Wildcard OpenAPI workflow shape.

Details

02

Why it matters

Wildcard agents.json gives agents workflow-level context beyond plain OpenAPI, including flows, links, examples, and API action structure. It is an emerging OpenAPI-adjacent proposal, so scanners should validate the contract shape without treating it as an A2A or IETF standard.

Check name

agents.json

Score

35/100

Status

fail

Category

Skill Discovery

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish a Wildcard-style agents.json file so agents can discover OpenAPI-backed workflows, links, examples, and authentication requirements.

Result

agents.json failed at "Validate Wildcard schema shape".

Validation steps

  1. Validate Wildcard schema shape

    agents.json does not match the expected Wildcard OpenAPI workflow shape.

    agents.json schema shape is invalid or incomplete

  2. Validate API actions

    Wildcard agents.json must include valid OpenAPI-derived action or operation definitions.

    agents.json action definitions are invalid or missing

  3. Validate flows and links

    No executable flows were found.

    agents.json flows or links are invalid

  4. Review examples and LLM usability

    Examples or descriptions are too thin for reliable agent argument generation.

    agents.json examples or descriptions need improvement
Evidence log4 steps · 17 lines
Validate Wildcard schema shape [fail]! agents.json does not match the expected Wildcard OpenAPI workflow shape.INFOValidate Wildcard schema shapeINFOParse agents.json and classify contract shape shape="unknown"FAILCompare contract shape actual="unknown" expected="wildcard"FAILCompare missing required schema fields actual="none" expected="none"FAILCompare Content-Type with JSON expectation actual=true expected=trueFAILagents.json does not match the expected Wildcard OpenAPI workflow shape.Validate API actions [fail]! Wildcard agents.json must include valid OpenAPI-derived action or operation definitions.INFOValidate API actionsFAILCompare API action count actual=0 expected="> 0"FAILCompare invalid action definitions actual=0 expected=0FAILWildcard agents.json must include valid OpenAPI-derived action or operation definitions.Validate flows and links [fail]! No executable flows were found.INFOValidate flows and linksFAILCompare workflow flow count actual=0 expected="> 0"FAILCompare operation link issues actual=0 expected=0FAILNo executable flows were found.Review examples and LLM usability [warning]! Examples or descriptions are too thin for reliable agent argument generation.INFOReview examples and LLM usabilityWARNCompare usable example count actual=0 expected="> 0 when actions are present"WARNExamples or descriptions are too thin for reliable agent argument generation.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Answer-first passages

AEO: Answer-first passages scored 0/100 and needs a fix.

7 Fail

Needs attention

AEO: Answer-first passages

Failed check
01

Issue

42 section(s) bury or omit a concise opening answer. No direct definition pattern was detected.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Answer-first passages

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Answer-first passages scored 0/100 and needs a fix.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Entity and definition clarity

AEO: Entity and definition clarity scored 61/100 and needs improvement.

3 Warning

Needs attention

AEO: Entity and definition clarity

Warning
01

Issue

Title, h1, description, and opening copy are weakly aligned. No direct definition sentence was detected.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Entity and definition clarity

Score

61/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Entity and definition clarity scored 61/100 and needs improvement.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Extractable visible copy

AEO: Extractable visible copy scored 81/100 and needs improvement.

1 Warning

Needs attention

AEO: Extractable visible copy

Warning
01

Issue

Visible text has few answer-oriented terms or explanatory markers.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Extractable visible copy

Score

81/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Extractable visible copy scored 81/100 and needs improvement.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Question and answer structure

AEO: Question and answer structure scored 81/100 and needs improvement.

1 Warning

Needs attention

AEO: Question and answer structure

Warning
01

Issue

Visible text has few answer-oriented terms or explanatory markers.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Question and answer structure

Score

81/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Question and answer structure scored 81/100 and needs improvement.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Evidence and trust

AEO: Evidence and trust scored 86/100 and needs improvement.

1 Warning

Needs attention

AEO: Evidence and trust

Warning
01

Issue

Missing answer evidence or trust signals: aboutOrContact.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Evidence and trust

Score

86/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Evidence and trust scored 86/100 and needs improvement.

PerformancePerformanceBrowser audit

Forced reflow

100 Fail

Check name

Forced reflow

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Device

desktop

Category

Performance

Fix guidance

A forced reflow occurs when JavaScript queries geometric properties (such as offsetWidth) after styles have been invalidated by a change to the DOM state. This can result in poor performance. Learn more about [forced reflows](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/forced-reflow) and possible mitigations.

Evidence
{
  "description": "A forced reflow occurs when JavaScript queries geometric properties (such as offsetWidth) after styles have been invalidated by a change to the DOM state. This can result in poor performance. Learn more about [forced reflows](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/forced-reflow) and possible mitigations."
}

Sign in to see 29 other issues and the full report

Create a free account to unlock every issue, evidence details, exports, and higher free limits.

Fix with MCP or CLI

Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.

Fix with MCP / CLI

Score history