CanAgentUse tools

UCP Suite

Validate Universal Commerce Protocol discovery, then test product search, carts, checkout links, and merchant handoff flows.

MCP Playground

Connect to remote MCP servers, inspect tools and resources, test prompts, auth, headers, notifications, and JSON-RPC responses.

A2A Playground

Inspect Agent Cards, validate advertised endpoints, and prepare safe requests for agent-to-agent workflows.

Agent Website Viewer

Enter a public URL and see the roles, names, landmarks, controls, and blockers that shape how AI agents understand the page.

SCANNED
Jul 3, 2026, 12:39 AM
VISIBILITY
Public
Rescan Report
Share Report
Copy Report Link
Export Report
49/100

OVERALL SCORE

Level 2, Agent-Limited

Priority improvements needed for AI agents
AIDiscoverability54%Agent Easeof Use56%Security& Trust64%GEO, AIO, AEO57%SEO92%Performance67%Accessibility0%
  • AI Discoverability 54 out of 100
  • Agent Ease of Use 56 out of 100
  • Security & Trust 64 out of 100
  • GEO, AIO and AEO 57 out of 100
  • SEO 92 out of 100
  • Performance 67 out of 100
  • Accessibility 0 out of 100

CAPTURED SCREENSHOT

Captured website desktop screenshot

What AI sees of your website

Tradedoubler | Boosting partnerships since 1999 favicon

Tradedoubler | Boosting partnerships since 1999

We empower a thriving partner marketing network where everyone wins. Brands, Publishers, Creators and Influencers alike. Established in Stockholm by Felix Hagnö and Martin Lorentzon, co-founder of Spotify, Tradedoubler swiftly ascended to...

Open Agent View

Next step

Turn this report into a fix workflow

2 failed checks are ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.

Fix with MCP / CLI
Detailed report scores grouped by capability area
MetricScoreStatusPassedFailedWarningEvidence
AI Discoverability
54
Needs work3141View details
Discoverability
67
Needs work800
Content Readiness
58
Needs work2200
Bot Access Control
40
Priority fix141View details
Agent Ease of Use
56
Needs work1010View details
API
67
Needs work200
Auth
48
Priority fix100
Agent Commerce
83
Mostly ready600
Google Agentic Browsing
33
Priority fix110View details
GEO, AIO and AEO
57
Needs work700
GEO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable100
AIO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable300
AEO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable300
SEO
92
Strong900
SEO
92
Strong900
Security & Trust
64
Needs work1400
Security & Trust
64
Needs work1400
Performance
67
Needs work1200
Performance
67
Needs work1200

Prioritized recommendations

Issues ranked by score impact

3 items need attention

AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEmerging recommendation

ai.txt policy

ai.txt policy failed at "Fetch /ai.txt".

41 Fail

Needs attention

ai.txt policy

Failed check
01

Issue

/ai.txt returned HTTP 400.

Details

02

Why it matters

ai.txt is a fragmented emerging convention. It can communicate human-readable AI crawling, training, attribution, restriction, and contact guidance, but it is not a standard access-control mechanism and absence should not be penalized.

Check name

ai.txt policy

Score

18/100

Status

fail

Category

Bot Access Control

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish an advisory human-readable AI usage policy only when the site intentionally needs one.

Result

ai.txt policy failed at "Fetch /ai.txt".

Validation steps

  1. Fetch /ai.txt

    /ai.txt returned HTTP 400.

    /ai.txt could not be fetched when present
  2. Validate transport

    ai.txt appears to be an HTML page or error document rather than a plain-text policy.

    /ai.txt transport is invalid or not plain text
  3. Parse ai.txt policy

    Transport validation failed before policy parsing could be trusted.

    /ai.txt policy format is missing required sections or non-standard
  4. Validate policy content

    ai.txt does not follow the AI Visibility section model; treating it as non-standard advisory text.

    /ai.txt content is incomplete or unsafe
Evidence log4 steps · 18 lines
Fetch /ai.txt [fail]! /ai.txt returned HTTP 400.INFOFetch /ai.txtINFORequesting optional advisory policy file at /ai.txtFAILCompare /ai.txt HTTP response actual=400 expected="2xx when ai.txt is intentionally published; 404/410 means absent optional file" contentType="text/html; charset=UTF-8" length=2204FAIL/ai.txt returned HTTP 400. statusCode=400Validate transport [fail]! ai.txt appears to be an HTML page or error document rather than a plain-text policy.INFOValidate transportINFOChecking ai.txt media type, size, line count, and whether the response looks like plain text contentType="text/html; charset=UTF-8" length=2204 lineCount=53FAILCompare media type to preferred text/plain transport actual="text/html" expected="text/plain preferred; readable text required"FAILai.txt appears to be an HTML page or error document rather than a plain-text policy.Parse ai.txt policy [fail]! Transport validation failed before policy parsing could be trusted.INFOParse ai.txt policyINFODetecting ai.txt convention from bracket sections, frontmatter, headings, and ai.txt context linksINFODetected policy structure convention="unknown-text" sections=[] markdownHeadings=[]WARNCheck AI Visibility required sections actual="missing identity, permissions, restrictions" expected="identity, permissions, and restrictions" missingRecommended=["attribution","contact","content-types"]WARNTransport validation failed before policy parsing could be trusted.Validate policy content [warning]! ai.txt does not follow the AI Visibility section model; treating it as non-standard advisory text.INFOValidate policy contentINFOChecking required section content, permission/restriction language, attribution, contact details, and safety risks convention="unknown-text"INFODetected policy signals hasPermissionLanguage=false hasRestrictionLanguage=false hasTrainingLanguage=false hasAttributionLanguage=false hasContact=falseWARNCheck required and recommended section coverage actual={"missingRequired":["identity","permissions","restrictions"],"missingRecommended":["attribution","contact","content-types"]} expected={"missingRequired":[],"recommendedPresentWhenPossible":true}WARNai.txt does not follow the AI Visibility section model; treating it as non-standard advisory text.

AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEstablished

AI bot rules in robots.txt

AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".

35 Fail

Needs attention

AI bot rules in robots.txt

Failed check
01

Issue

No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.

Details

02

Why it matters

AI crawler product tokens have different meanings. Explicit robots.txt groups make training, search, and retrieval access policy auditable for compliant crawler operators.

Check name

AI bot rules in robots.txt

Score

31/100

Status

fail

Category

Bot Access Control

Maturity

Established

Goal

Declare deliberate robots.txt rules for major AI training, AI search, user-triggered, and dataset crawlers.

Result

AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".

Validation steps

  1. Classify AI crawler rules

    No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.

    robots.txt lacks explicit AI crawler rules
Evidence log1 step · 6 lines
Classify AI crawler rules [fail]! No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.INFOClassify AI crawler rulesINFOParsing User-agent groups and Allow/Disallow records for known AI crawler tokens evaluatedPath="/"INFOEvaluating exact User-agent matches before wildcard fallback exactAiPolicyCount=0 totalCrawlerTokens=18FAILNo explicit AI crawler User-agent groups were found examplesExpected=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ClaudeBot","Google-Extended","CCBot"]FAILCompare explicit AI crawler coverage actual=0 expected="> 0 explicit non-search AI crawler policies" missingTokens=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ChatGPT-User","ClaudeBot","Claude-SearchBot","Claude-User","Google-Extended","Applebot-Extended","Amazonbot","Amzn-SearchBot","Amzn-User","PerplexityBot"]INFOResolved effective root-path policy for crawler tokens blocked=0 allowed=21 unspecified=0

Agent Ease of UseGoogle Agentic BrowsingBrowser audit

Accessibility tree is not well-formed

100 Fail

Check name

Accessibility tree is not well-formed

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Device

desktop

Category

Google Agentic Browsing

Fix guidance

A well-formed [accessibility tree](http://goo.gle/lighthouse-agentic-a11y) helps AI agents to navigate and interact with the page.

Evidence
{
  "description": "A well-formed [accessibility tree](http://goo.gle/lighthouse-agentic-a11y) helps AI agents to navigate and interact with the page."
}

Sign in to see 47 other issues and the full report

Create a free account to unlock every issue, evidence details, exports, and higher free limits.

Email code

Fix with MCP or CLI

Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.

Fix with MCP / CLI

Score history

Public scan score over time

Public reports for this website origin. Select any point or report link to open that canonical report.

2 reports
Public score history report links
Scan dateScoreReadinessReport
54/100Level 3, Bot-AwareView report
49/100Level 2, Agent-LimitedCurrent report