Export Report
OVERALL SCORE
Level 2, Agent-Limited
- AI Discoverability 24 out of 100
- Agent Ease of Use 50 out of 100
- Security & Trust 45 out of 100
- GEO, AIO and AEO 33 out of 100
- SEO 75 out of 100
- Performance 59 out of 100
- Accessibility 0 out of 100
What AI sees of your website
网易有道
网易有道是中国领先的智能学习公司，致力于提供100%以用户为导向的学习产品和服务。有道成立于2006年，打造了一系列深受用户喜欢的口碑型大众学习工具产品，例如：网易有道词典、有道精品课、有道翻译官、有道云笔记等。2014年，网易有道宣布正式进军互联网教育行业。2018年4月，网易有道完成首次战略融资，投后估值11.2亿美金，跻身独角兽阵营。2019年10月，网易有道成功登陆纽交所，股票代码为“DAO”，成为网易集团首个独立上市的公司。
Next step
Turn this report into a fix workflow
2 failed checks are ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.
| Metric | Score | Status | Passed | Failed | Warning | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI Discoverability | 24 | Priority fix | 6 | 4 | 1 | View details |
| Discoverability | 20 | Priority fix | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| Content Readiness | 3 | Priority fix | 3 | 3 | 1 | View details |
| Bot Access Control | 45 | Priority fix | 1 | 1 | 0 | View details |
| GEO, AIO and AEO | 33 | Priority fix | 4 | 0 | 0 | |
| GEO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| AIO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| AEO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| SEO | 75 | Mostly ready | 6 | 0 | 0 | |
| SEO | 75 | Mostly ready | 6 | 0 | 0 | |
| Security & Trust | 45 | Priority fix | 7 | 0 | 0 | |
| Security & Trust | 45 | Priority fix | 7 | 0 | 0 | |
| Performance | 59 | Needs work | 11 | 1 | 0 | View details |
| Performance | 59 | Needs work | 11 | 1 | 0 | View details |
Prioritized recommendations
Issues ranked by score impact
3 items need attention
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Content freshness signals
Content freshness signals is missing or incomplete.
100 Fail
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Content freshness signals
Content freshness signals is missing or incomplete.
Needs attention
Content freshness signals
Issue
Content freshness signals are incomplete: missing any valid freshness date in Last-Modified, Schema.org, Open Graph, Dublin Core, generic meta, or sitemap lastmod.
Details
Why it matters
Freshness signals help agents, crawlers, and search systems decide whether content is current enough to cite, summarize, cache, or compare against newer sources.
Check name
Content freshness signals
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Category
Content Readiness
Maturity
Established
Goal
Expose modified and published dates for freshness-aware retrieval, citation, and ranking.
Result
Content freshness signals is missing or incomplete.
Validation steps
Validate Last-Modified header
No valid Last-Modified HTTP header was found.
Validate structured freshness dates
No Schema.org freshness dates were found.
Validate metadata freshness dates
No Open Graph, Dublin Core, or generic meta freshness date was found.
Corroborate with sitemap lastmod
Add a sitemap entry with a valid lastmod for the canonical page URL when sitemap corroboration is useful.
Evidence log4 steps · 16 lines
Validate Last-Modified header [fail]! No valid Last-Modified HTTP header was found.INFOValidate Last-Modified headerINFOReading Last-Modified response headerFAILCheck Last-Modified header is present and parseable actual="missing" expected="valid" alternateDates=[]FAILLast-Modified header is missing or invalidValidate structured freshness dates [fail]! No Schema.org freshness dates were found.INFOValidate structured freshness datesINFOCollecting Schema.org freshness dates from JSON-LD, Microdata, and RDFaFAILCheck structured freshness date count actual=0 expected="> 0" invalidDateCount=0 formats={} alternateDates=[]FAILNo structured freshness dates foundValidate metadata freshness dates [fail]! No Open Graph, Dublin Core, or generic meta freshness date was found.INFOValidate metadata freshness datesINFOCollecting Open Graph, Dublin Core, and generic meta freshness datesFAILCheck metadata freshness date count actual=0 expected="> 0" metaDateCount=0 invalidDateCount=0 alternateDates=[]FAILNo metadata freshness dates foundCorroborate with sitemap lastmod [warning]INFOCorroborate with sitemap lastmodINFODiscovering sitemap candidates and matching the scanned page URL candidateCount=1 attempts=1WARNCheck matching sitemap lastmod actual="no match" expected="valid match when available" robotsStatusCode=200WARNNo matching sitemap lastmod found after sitemap attempts attempts=1
AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEstablished
AI bot rules in robots.txt
AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".
69 Fail
AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEstablished
AI bot rules in robots.txt
AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".
Needs attention
AI bot rules in robots.txt
Issue
No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.
Why it matters
AI crawler product tokens have different meanings. Explicit robots.txt groups make training, search, and retrieval access policy auditable for compliant crawler operators.
Check name
AI bot rules in robots.txt
Score
31/100
Status
fail
Category
Bot Access Control
Maturity
Established
Goal
Declare deliberate robots.txt rules for major AI training, AI search, user-triggered, and dataset crawlers.
Result
AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".
Validation steps
Classify AI crawler rules
No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.
Evidence log1 step · 6 lines
Classify AI crawler rules [fail]! No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.INFOClassify AI crawler rulesINFOParsing User-agent groups and Allow/Disallow records for known AI crawler tokens evaluatedPath="/"INFOEvaluating exact User-agent matches before wildcard fallback exactAiPolicyCount=0 totalCrawlerTokens=18FAILNo explicit AI crawler User-agent groups were found examplesExpected=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ClaudeBot","Google-Extended","CCBot"]FAILCompare explicit AI crawler coverage actual=0 expected="> 0 explicit non-search AI crawler policies" missingTokens=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ChatGPT-User","ClaudeBot","Claude-SearchBot","Claude-User","Google-Extended","Applebot-Extended","Amazonbot","Amzn-SearchBot","Amzn-User","PerplexityBot"]INFOResolved effective root-path policy for crawler tokens blocked=0 allowed=0 unspecified=21PerformancePerformanceBrowser audit
Avoid large layout shifts
100 Fail
PerformancePerformanceBrowser audit
Avoid large layout shifts
Check name
Avoid large layout shifts
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Device
desktop
Category
Performance
Estimated savings
5 layout shifts found
Fix guidance
These are the largest layout shifts observed on the page. Each table item represents a single layout shift, and shows the element that shifted the most. Below each item are possible root causes that led to the layout shift. Some of these layout shifts may not be included in the CLS metric value due to [windowing](https://web.dev/articles/cls#what_is_cls). [Learn how to improve CLS](https://web.dev/articles/optimize-cls)
References
web.dev/learn/performanceEvidence
{
"displayValue": "5 layout shifts found",
"description": "These are the largest layout shifts observed on the page. Each table item represents a single layout shift, and shows the element that shifted the most. Below each item are possible root causes that led to the layout shift. Some of these layout shifts may not be included in the CLS metric value due to [windowing](https://web.dev/articles/cls#what_is_cls). [Learn how to improve CLS](https://web.dev/articles/optimize-cls)"
}Sign in to see 55 other issues and the full report
Create a free account to unlock every issue, evidence details, exports, and higher free limits.
Fix with MCP or CLI
Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.
Score history