CanAgentUse tools

UCP Suite

Validate Universal Commerce Protocol discovery, then test product search, carts, checkout links, and merchant handoff flows.

MCP Playground

Connect to remote MCP servers, inspect tools and resources, test prompts, auth, headers, notifications, and JSON-RPC responses.

A2A Playground

Inspect Agent Cards, validate advertised endpoints, and prepare safe requests for agent-to-agent workflows.

Agent Website Viewer

Enter a public URL and see the roles, names, landmarks, controls, and blockers that shape how AI agents understand the page.

SCANNED
Jul 28, 2026, 1:26 AM
VISIBILITY
Public
Rescan Report
Share Report
Copy Report Link
Export Report
47/100

OVERALL SCORE

Level 2, Agent-Limited

Priority improvements needed for AI agents
AIDiscoverability28%Agent Easeof Use44%Security& Trust45%GEO, AIO, AEO27%SEO83%Performance81%Accessibility79%
  • AI Discoverability 28 out of 100
  • Agent Ease of Use 44 out of 100
  • Security & Trust 45 out of 100
  • GEO, AIO and AEO 27 out of 100
  • SEO 83 out of 100
  • Performance 81 out of 100
  • Accessibility 79 out of 100

CAPTURED SCREENSHOT

Captured website desktop screenshot

What AI sees of your website

THIS DOMAIN HAS BEEN SEIZED

No page metadata or readable excerpt was captured.

Open Agent View

Next step

Turn this report into a fix workflow

3 failed checks are ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.

Fix with MCP / CLI
Detailed report scores grouped by capability area
MetricScoreStatusPassedFailedWarningEvidence
AI Discoverability
28
Priority fix1100
Discoverability
28
Priority fix300
Content Readiness
22
Priority fix800
Agent Ease of Use
44
Priority fix1952View details
API
44
Priority fix700
Auth
10
Priority fix100
MCP
47
Priority fix200
Skill Discovery
46
Priority fix231View details
Agent Commerce
49
Priority fix521View details
Google Agentic Browsing
67
Needs work200
GEO, AIO and AEO
27
Priority fix341View details
GEO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable100
AIO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable100
AEO Readiness
22
Priority fix141View details
SEO
83
Mostly ready700
SEO
83
Mostly ready700
Security & Trust
45
Priority fix700
Security & Trust
45
Priority fix700
Performance
81
Mostly ready1600
Performance
81
Mostly ready1600

Prioritized recommendations

Issues ranked by score impact

7 items need attention

Agent Ease of UseSkill DiscoveryEmerging recommendation

agents.json

agents.json failed at "Validate Wildcard schema shape".

65 Fail

Needs attention

agents.json

Failed check
01

Issue

agents.json response is not valid JSON.

Details

02

Why it matters

Wildcard agents.json gives agents workflow-level context beyond plain OpenAPI, including flows, links, examples, and API action structure. It is an emerging OpenAPI-adjacent proposal, so scanners should validate the contract shape without treating it as an A2A or IETF standard.

Check name

agents.json

Score

35/100

Status

fail

Category

Skill Discovery

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish a Wildcard-style agents.json file so agents can discover OpenAPI-backed workflows, links, examples, and authentication requirements.

Result

agents.json failed at "Validate Wildcard schema shape".

Validation steps

  1. Validate Wildcard schema shape

    agents.json response is not valid JSON.

    agents.json schema shape is invalid or incomplete
  2. Validate API actions

    Wildcard agents.json must include valid OpenAPI-derived action or operation definitions.

    agents.json action definitions are invalid or missing
  3. Validate flows and links

    No executable flows were found.

    agents.json flows or links are invalid
  4. Review examples and LLM usability

    Examples or descriptions are too thin for reliable agent argument generation.

    agents.json examples or descriptions need improvement
Evidence log4 steps · 17 lines
Validate Wildcard schema shape [fail]! agents.json response is not valid JSON.INFOValidate Wildcard schema shapeINFOParse agents.json and classify contract shape shape="unknown"FAILCompare contract shape actual="unknown" expected="wildcard"FAILCompare missing required schema fields actual="none" expected="none"FAILCompare Content-Type with JSON expectation actual=false expected=trueFAILagents.json response is not valid JSON.Validate API actions [fail]! Wildcard agents.json must include valid OpenAPI-derived action or operation definitions.INFOValidate API actionsFAILCompare API action count actual=0 expected="> 0"FAILCompare invalid action definitions actual=0 expected=0FAILWildcard agents.json must include valid OpenAPI-derived action or operation definitions.Validate flows and links [fail]! No executable flows were found.INFOValidate flows and linksFAILCompare workflow flow count actual=0 expected="> 0"FAILCompare operation link issues actual=0 expected=0FAILNo executable flows were found.Review examples and LLM usability [warning]! Examples or descriptions are too thin for reliable agent argument generation.INFOReview examples and LLM usabilityWARNCompare usable example count actual=0 expected="> 0 when actions are present"WARNExamples or descriptions are too thin for reliable agent argument generation.

Agent Ease of UseAgent CommerceInformational

ACP - Agentic Commerce Protocol

ACP - Agentic Commerce Protocol failed at "Fetch ACP discovery".

58 Fail

Needs attention

ACP - Agentic Commerce Protocol

Failed check
01

Issue

ACP discovery content type "text/html" is not JSON-compatible.

Details

02

Why it matters

ACP discovery lets agents find the seller's ACP API base URL, supported versions, transports, and stable services before attempting authenticated checkout-session negotiation.

Check name

ACP - Agentic Commerce Protocol

Score

42/100

Status

fail

Category

Agent Commerce

Maturity

Informational

Goal

Expose valid ACP discovery when this origin supports Agentic Commerce Protocol workflows.

Result

ACP - Agentic Commerce Protocol failed at "Fetch ACP discovery".

Validation steps

  1. Fetch ACP discovery

    ACP discovery content type "text/html" is not JSON-compatible.

    ACP discovery is missing or not parseable
  2. Validate ACP discovery shape

    ACP discovery could not be parsed.

    ACP discovery protocol metadata is invalid
  3. Review ACP cache and retry metadata

    ACP discovery is missing Cache-Control guidance.

    ACP discovery cache or retry metadata needs review
Evidence log3 steps · 14 lines
Fetch ACP discovery [fail]! ACP discovery content type "text/html" is not JSON-compatible.INFOFetch ACP discovery status="fail"INFOFetch canonical ACP discovery /.well-known/acp.json statusCode=200 contentType="text/html" parsed=false error="Unexpected token '<', \"<!DOCTYPE \"... is not valid JSON"FAILCheck canonical ACP discovery response actual=false expected=true canonicalFound=trueFAILACP discovery content type "text/html" is not JSON-compatible.Validate ACP discovery shape [fail]! ACP discovery could not be parsed.INFOValidate ACP discovery shape status="fail"INFOValidate ACP protocol object, name, date version, and supported_versions orderingFAILCheck protocol object and name actual={"hasProtocol":false} expected={"hasProtocol":true,"protocolName":"acp"}FAILCheck protocol version history actual={"supportedVersionCount":0,"supportedVersionsOrdered":false,"supportedVersionsEndWithCurrent":false} expected="date version with chronological supported_versions ending in current version"FAILACP discovery could not be parsed.Review ACP cache and retry metadata [warning]! ACP discovery is missing Cache-Control guidance.INFOReview ACP cache and retry metadata status="warning"INFOInspect ACP discovery cache headers and retry guidance statusCode=200 cacheControl=null retryAfter=nullWARNCheck Cache-Control header on successful discovery actual="missing" expected="present for cacheable public discovery"WARNCheck Retry-After on rate-limit or unavailable responses actual="not required" expected="present only for 429 or 503"WARNACP discovery is missing Cache-Control guidance.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Evidence and trust

AEO: Evidence and trust scored 0/100 and needs a fix.

7 Fail

Needs attention

AEO: Evidence and trust

Failed check
01

Issue

Missing answer evidence or trust signals: author, publisher, freshnessDate, sources, sameAs, aboutOrContact, policyLinks.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Evidence and trust

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Evidence and trust scored 0/100 and needs a fix.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Question and answer structure

AEO: Question and answer structure scored 40/100 and needs a fix.

4 Fail

Needs attention

AEO: Question and answer structure

Failed check
01

Issue

No natural question headings were detected. No visible FAQ or Q&A pattern was detected. Heading structure issues were detected. No list or table answer format was detected.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Question and answer structure

Score

40/100

Status

fail

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Question and answer structure scored 40/100 and needs a fix.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Entity and definition clarity

AEO: Entity and definition clarity scored 44/100 and needs a fix.

4 Fail

Needs attention

AEO: Entity and definition clarity

Failed check
01

Issue

Expected exactly one h1, found 0. Missing meta description or Open Graph description. No direct definition sentence was detected.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Entity and definition clarity

Score

44/100

Status

fail

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Entity and definition clarity scored 44/100 and needs a fix.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Extractable visible copy

AEO: Extractable visible copy scored 46/100 and needs a fix.

4 Fail

Needs attention

AEO: Extractable visible copy

Failed check
01

Issue

Only 5 visible words were detected for answer extraction. Visible text has few answer-oriented terms or explanatory markers.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Extractable visible copy

Score

46/100

Status

fail

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Extractable visible copy scored 46/100 and needs a fix.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Answer-first passages

AEO: Answer-first passages scored 55/100 and needs improvement.

3 Warning

Needs attention

AEO: Answer-first passages

Warning
01

Issue

No h2/h3 answer sections were detected. No direct definition pattern was detected.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Answer-first passages

Score

55/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Answer-first passages scored 55/100 and needs improvement.

Sign in to see 43 other issues and the full report

Create a free account to unlock every issue, evidence details, exports, and higher free limits.

Fix with MCP or CLI

Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.

Fix with MCP / CLI

Score history